- Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. has, since the beginning of the show, supported vehemently the idea that the circumstances of one's life don't matter because everyone has freewill, and as such, any villain is a villain because they choose to be evil. The show heavily backs this idea, especially when the protagonists use it as a justification to punish the villains, and portrays villains that try to justify their circumstances simply not wanting to take responsibility for their actions. Come the Framework arc, the protagonists are thrown into a matrix where their greatest regrets are erased. The world is taken over by HYDRA, and many of the protagonists work for or assist HYDRA due to having lived different lives, including The Heart of the group, who becomes HYDRA's second-in-command and eventual leader, and kills and tortures multiple people without a care in the world. Yet, with the exception of one of them, all of the protagonists insist they're not at fault because they had their memories rewritten, and the show backs this idea, and not one of them are ever held accountable for their crimes or actions in the Framework. Apparently, circumstances do matter, but only when it's the good guys who do evil things.
Deleted this because because Fitz was brainwashed and given Fake Memories. Framework!Fitz was effectively a different character from real!Fitz, and the former is effectively dead. Ward was never brainwashed, only trained. So there really is no comparison.
Hide / Show RepliesIt is a bit of a stretch to try and make it a broken Aesop when everybody in the mainframe where literally rebuilt from the ground up from altered memories and circumstance. So the trope in no way or form applies.
The Doctor Who example from "The Parting of the Ways" is questionable. Nine was played from beginning to end as having something resembling PTSD over the events of the Time War and it's reasonable to interpret the scene as him simply being unable to bring himself to destroy an inhabited planet again, despite the consequences. Cowardice, yes (by his own admission), but not really a Broken Aesop.
cutting two Fresh Prince Of Bel Air examples:
- The second one is about how Will quits a Western Philosophy class in College, because he thinks it will be too hard for him. But the moment after he dismisses Will from the class, the professor changes into a total different person, who Will starts to like. Will is reprimanded for quitting the class too soon, but nobody seems to care about how wrong and weird it was that the professor changed his personality like that...
The professor doesn't suddenly change. Him and Will get off on the wrong foot and Will antagonizes him from the beginning. We only see him reacting to that until after he dismisses Will. His behavior is consistent and doesn't affect the Aesop.
- Not to mention the episode, where Will pretends that his baby cousin Nicky is his own son. He gets the attention of a girl and many gifts (including a trip to Hawaii), until he finally confesses that he only lied about being a single father. So all these gifts go to another man, who supposedly is a real single father, except that he confesses to Will that he too only was lying! So the aesop doesn't become "never tell a lie" as much as "if you're going to lie, don't be stupid enough to confess that you're lying".
Do I need to say it? The twist ending is clearly Played for Laughs. (A Stock Aesop like "do what's right morally, whether you're rewarded for it or not", stands anyway.
Hide / Show RepliesI don't understand the basis for thinking TNG's The Game was trying to prove an Aesop. On it's face, it's just an episode about an alien using technology to brainwash the crew, just like plenty of other technologies in other episodes. The medium happens to be a game, but there are no quotes or elements in the story that hint at an Aesop or lesson.
- Despite the moral being to treat the gangers as humans, the Arc of the season is kicked off by having the Doctor melt Amy's ganger with his screwdriver. By the logic of "The Almost People", this was an act of murder, as the ganger had feelings of its own.
Amy was connected to her ganger. Her consciousness was in the ganger while real body was being held in that box. She was the only consciousness involved; there was no other ganger. Therefore, no murder. All the Doctor did was cut the connection and return her to her rightful body.
Hide / Show RepliesI'm confused. How is it different from the other gangers?
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.Because the other gangers gained independent consciousness and awareness. The only reason they gained awareness was because of that storm. Amy's ganger didn't have that. It wasn't an entity seperate from Amy.
Oh, is that the case? If so, they didn't do a great job pointing it out... I've seen the episodes a couple times and didn't realize that was the case. But if so, you're correct, those are clearly different circumstances (though I don't blame the person for adding it in the first place).
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.I understand the confusion. I wish it had been explained better, as well. Frankly, I'm not surprised anyone is confused about it.
Edited by 24.126.51.214
Removed:
This is a real wall of text, but from what I can gather, an episode can't have a female empowerment message because the female characters aren't written well (which seems subjective) and there can't be any misogyny in hip hop because female rappers presumably aren't misogynist (which doesn't prevent misogyny coming from male rappers). Further, I don't think the latter would qualify as a "broken" aesop unless the show acknowledged that non-misogynous rappers exist. Instead, the entry just disagrees with the aesop.
Edited by CaptainCrawdad