Follow TV Tropes

Following

IP discussion: thread reasons, policies, other stuff

Go To

In an effort to keep the volume of threads in IP at a reasonable level, and to encourage creating threads that address genuine problems, we need to make some notes about when to request a thread and what constitutes valid reasons for a thread. These have been mentioned in some of the other IP procedure threads, but they're being listed here for quick reference.

    open/close all folders 

    Screening of new threads 
  • New IP threads don't require approval by the staff to be opened. Still, the staff can and will lock threads with improper reasoning and warn the troper if needed. Please take time to review the guidelines below and make sure your request is solid before submitting it.
  • A thread started within two weeks of the closing of a previous thread on the same page that doesn't have a concrete suggestion will be summarily closed.

    General notes 
  • Also refer to: About Images and Copyright, How to Pick a Good Image, and Images On Wiki Pages.
  • Going through IP for a page that doesn't have an image or an IP tag isn't obligatory, but it is strongly recommended. Otherwise, the image you put up may end up coming to the forum for work or replacement.
  • Pages that have gone through IP should have a commented-out tag showing the relevant thread(s) and any related information. Always check for these before adding a pic or requesting an IP thread for a page. If a page does have a tag, please note its information when you start a thread.
  • It's recommended to discuss image concerns and thread reasons in the threads that are pinned at the top of the forum before starting a new thread. They may be able to address the issue(s) without needing to start a dedicated thread.
  • Keep the quality criteria listed below in mind when making an image suggestion.
  • Work pages that don't have an image generally don't require an IP thread to upload one, but feel free to start a thread if you have multiple ideas.
  • Animated GIFs can't be uploaded as page pics, so don't bother trying. (The pic on Creepy Changing Painting is a bit of HTML magic and not a true GIF, in case you're wondering.)
  • In threads for specific pages, you may see people casting votes by referring to a post number and (if applicable) the number of the image in a given post. For example, "2" would refer to "the image in the second post", and "3.2" would refer to "the second image in post 3".
  • We try to operate on "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality, and we try not to change an image just for the sake of changing it. In reference to this, someone might call a suggestion a "lateral move". If the image on the page is not otherwise problematic, consider if your suggestion is a clear improvement before pitching it.
  • It usually takes 5-7 [tup] votes for a pic to be considered to have consensus in a thread; pics can be put up with less than this, but usually only at a moderator's discretion.
    In crowners:
    • An option has consensus if it has a minimum of a 2:1 vote ratio.
    • If a crowner ends with no options having consensus, the crowner and thread are considered to be failed and the thread will be closed unless there is significant ongoing discussion.
    • Crowners normally run for 5 days, but can go longer if more time is needed, and can be closed early for the following criteria:
      • At any point, if the leading option has a vote balance of 10 or more and no other options have consensus. This is considered "super-consensus".
      • After 3 days, if the leading option has a vote balance of at least 8 and no other options have consensus.
      • After 4 days, if the leading option is the only one that has consensus.
    • Crowners can only be made by moderators and engineers, usually after discussion has stalled for a few days. Crowners can be requested by regular users by compiling and linking options in a post and hollering for it to be made into a crowner.
    • Non-moderators can add crowner options to an ongoing crowner, but cannot edit options they didn't add, nor can they call or lock a crowner. If you add an entry to an ongoing crowner, please note this in the thread.

    IP thread reasons 

High-priority image issues

  • A pic has been changed or removed from a page for a reason that may not be valid, or no reason at all, especially if the pic was chosen by a previous IP thread. These changes can sometimes be simply reverted by a moderator without a need for further discussion.
  • Not Safe For Work (NSFW)
    • If you're unsure on whether a pic fits this or not, bring it up in the IP Discussion thread.
    • Classic works of art containing nudity, such as Michelangelo's David or Botticelli's The Birth of Venus, don't necessarily fall into this, but appropriateness for the page in question is the key factor, and SFW options should be considered whenever possible.
  • The image is a spoiler. The age and/or infamy of the work the image originates from may prevent this from being considered a valid issue.
  • Watermarking. A TV channel emblem on a screencap is a "bug", not a true watermark, and is permissible as long as it's not obtrusive.
  • Meme-based images are not permitted as page pics. The sole general exceptions are Image Macro (for obvious reasons) and a work's Memes page, where they should only be considered if there are no better options.Other exceptions
  • A page has an image that is obviously from the wrong work / programming block / network / etc.
  • Copyright issues:
    • The pic implies TV Tropes is claiming the copyright.
    • The pic has been taken from a site that deals in copyrighted images or videos, especially if a watermark has been removed and/or the site is selling their content. Screencaps from videos from these sites are not permitted, either.
    • The image is the entirety of a product for sale, such as a t-shirt design.
    • Images from illegally obtained materials, such as leaks or camrips, are not allowed.
    • Using an entire work:
      • Basically, if it's copyrighted, we have to get permission to use it. This covers single-panel cartoons, photographs, entire comic strips and webcomics, and similar works. If permission is granted to use a work, it's always noted on the page in some fashion, usually in the caption and/or with the page tag. If an artist requests a specific way to display their connection to the pic, we'll do our best to honor it.
      • The creators of xkcd and Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal have given us carte blanche to use entire works as needed. Permission notices for such cases aren't required.
      • Entire cards from card-based games like Magic: The Gathering are impractical but can be used. Using the art from these cards is fine.
      • Any such work that's in the public domain is free to use.
    • Some creators do not want their work used outside their control at all, but fair use means that we are not legally bound to honor this for the wiki's purposes, aside from the aforementioned restrictions. We'll honor a take-down request, but it's up to them to send it. We're not obliged to chase them down and ask them what their policy is. Fair use also allows us to use excerpts of works without seeking permission. In this case, the minimum needed to get the trope across should be used.
    • Per the site owner, AI generated images are allowed on TV Tropes and will be treated just like regular images.

General reasons

  • Multiple suggestions for a page without a pic. Single suggestions are currently being filtered through the Image Suggestion thread instead of getting their own threads right off the bat.
  • The current pic doesn't adequately demonstrate the trope. Examples of this include:
    • Just a Face and a Caption (JAFAAC)—the pic shows an example of the trope but relies on familiarity with its subject(s) to make the connection to the trope evident.
    • A pic that is nothing but text, or one where the text overwhelms the imagery. "May/Might as well be a page quote" is often used to describe this. There are exceptions (Spoof Aesop, for example), especially for dialogue-based tropes, but generally we want to have actual images as page pics with just enough text to support the expression of the trope.
  • Poor image quality. Graininess, motion blur, and compression artifacts are three of the most common problems. Before starting a thread for this reason, see if the Quality Upgrade thread can help find or create a nicer version of the image. Replacing images with a better-quality version is a free action, i.e. can be done without starting a thread.
If the size value in a pic's coding is larger than the actual size of the pic, it will stretch the pic to that width which will introduce artifacts. Check the image's properties before starting a thread; if this is the issue, a change to the coding will fix it.
The age of some works may make getting a truly high-quality image from them difficult. This will be taken into consideration when deciding on a pic.
  • The current pic is taken from a multi-panel work such as a comic strip or webcomic and uses more than half of the source material.
  • Fan-art on a work page instead of an image from the work itself.
  • The current pic is overly fanservicey, especially in the Creator/ namespace. In the case of Fanservice tropes, pics should be as low-key as possible while still getting the trope across.
  • Two trope pages have the same pic.
    • While it's preferred that they be separate, a trope page can have the same image as a work page or a character image from a Characters subpage. In these cases, a thread should have at least one replacement suggestion for either page.
    • Similarly, graphics can generally be reused among a work's subpages. Threads that address these will still be accepted, but should also have at least one replacement suggestion.
  • You believe you have a suggestion that better illustrates the trope than the current pic (by Image Pickin' standards, not "This is a cooler pic.")
  • A page marked as No Real Life Examples, Please! has a Real Life pic.Exceptions
  • A YMMV or Audience Reaction page has a pic that is not In-Universe.Exceptions
  • A page has an unusual image arrangement not chosen by an IP thread and you don't think it works well, e.g. having two images on a trope page or an image that's a janky collage. Some pages may have multiple pics for a reason, so check for an IP tag before starting a thread in this case.

Invalid reasons

  • Trying to solicit ideas for an image. IP has a cap of 60 threads and is usually at or near capacity on any given day, so space can't be allotted for threads whose only purpose is to brainstorm.
  • Not liking an image's art style, layout/design, or any Photoshopping or similar alterations that may have been made, provided they don't impact the pic's quality.
  • Claiming that a particular work is over-/under-represented. This can have some impact on deciding on a pic, but should never be the main gist of a thread.
  • Trying to argue that a pic you liked wasn't chosen in a previous thread, especially if it lost in a crowner, or trying to make an invalid argument that a pic doesn't work for a page even though it was chosen by a thread. Repeatedly doing this is considered griefing and is grounds for suspension from the workshop forums.
  • Some trope pages feature Visual Puns or other jokey pics rather than something that actually demonstrates the trope, usually because these pages have been very hard to find a better pic for.Example Don't request a thread just because you don't like the joke; if you've got an actual example, that's fine. Also, see the "Don't change the pic" section on the page mentioned below.

    Special cases 
For a list of pages that have unique statuses, see Image Pickin' Special Cases

General cases:

  • Pages within the FanficRecs/, Fridge/, Haiku/, Headscratchers/, ImageLinks/, Laconic/, PlayingWith/, Quotes/, Trivia/, WMG/, and YMMV/ namespaces and disambiguations default to no pic; YMMV.Home Page and Headscratchers.Home Page are the only exceptions. Pages in the Analysis/ namespace default to BUPKIS status (meaning they won't have a pic unless a really good one is found; see Image Pickin' Special Cases for more details)
  • Due to their exceptional subjectivity and persistent problems with images being poor quality and/or not illustrative, Moments pages (Awesome/, Funny/, Heartwarming/, NightmareFuel/, Shocking/, TearJerker/) are limited to one image.
  • Pages for unreleased works shall keep the first image that is uploaded to the page when it's created, with further pre-release images relegated to an Image Links page. Once the work is released, a thread may be created to decide which image is to be officially used on the page. See this Wiki Talk thread for details. Note that the first image may still be removed if it falls afoul of any of the aforementioned guidelines.

    Image Pickin' flowchart 

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/ip_flowchartdrawio_8_transformed.png

Text version:

Is the page on Image Pickin' Special Cases?

  • If yes, start a thread.
  • If no, does it already have an image?

Edited by kory on May 2nd 2024 at 11:16:14 AM

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#951: Feb 27th 2015 at 4:38:32 AM

[up][up]You have a funny way of using and interpreting the word "if".

[up]Same can be said for the supposed problems caused by flipping. But very few people outside IP even comment on images, so it's hard to tell either way.

Anyway, I don't see this leading anywhere at the moment.

Check out my fanfiction!
MarqFJA The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer from Deserts of the Middle East (Before Recorded History) Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer
#952: Feb 27th 2015 at 4:58:03 AM

Same can be said for the supposed problems caused by flipping.
That's true, but to be honest the onus is on the proponets of flipping to prove that such a measure addresses an actual problem, otherwise there's no reason to even pursue said measure in the first place. It's as if the US government passed a law dictating that sapient nonhuman animals are to be given the same rights as humans when nobody has proved that there are any sapient nonhuman animals in the first place.

edited 27th Feb '15 4:58:25 AM by MarqFJA

Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
ThePope Since: Oct, 2010
#954: Feb 27th 2015 at 7:44:37 AM

I think it would be a pretty interesting experiment to make everything right to left with a note, and then see just how many people actually come onto IP and say "I don't get it! Why doesn't this read normally?"

Because the number of people who would do that is minimal at best.

Sandbylur Since: Jun, 2009
#955: Feb 27th 2015 at 9:21:58 AM

[up] People don't go into IP to complain about pictures that are demonstrably confusing and/or misleading. What makes you think this would be any different? Not to mention, IP is already working over capacity with regular issues without artificially causing complaints

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#956: Feb 27th 2015 at 9:51:23 AM

Agreed; we're not making much headway with the problems we have now, introducing a new monkey wrench isn't happening.

ThePope Since: Oct, 2010
#957: Feb 27th 2015 at 10:02:49 AM

Well as is, it's chaos. Some images are right to left, some are left to right, some are only flipped speech bubbles, others scramble frames around to make sense.

Rethkir A Trusted Friend in Science and Ponies from the gap between dimensions Since: Mar, 2013
#958: Feb 27th 2015 at 10:04:11 AM

This debate is a nightmare. We are never going to agree on this. Can we at least agree on that? I'm staunchly in favor of flipping and opposed to any alternate measures, as they are clunky in comparison. However, I know that those who oppose flipping will never change their view, no matter what arguments my side makes. So, can we settle this in any other way than arguing, like as someone suggested before, a vote?

Image Source. Please update whenever an image is changed.
MrL1193 Since: Apr, 2013
#959: Feb 27th 2015 at 1:38:57 PM

You have a funny way of using and interpreting the word "if".

You're avoiding my question. All I'm asking for is your opinion about the idea of flipping images and adding notes. Why are you so reluctant to answer that?

Everyone else, I'd also like to hear what you all think before we resort to a vote. Could we try flipping the images but also adding notes to inform readers about the change? Could we do this as a possible compromise between Notes Only and Flipping Only (since the two sides obviously will never agree on one or the other of those)?

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#960: Feb 27th 2015 at 2:21:34 PM

Why do you think that binding wiki policy is made by a general vote of a dozen or two tropers in a forum thread?

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#961: Feb 27th 2015 at 3:53:42 PM

[up][up]Already answered that. Something more elaborate than that would be derailing.

Check out my fanfiction!
MrL1193 Since: Apr, 2013
#962: Feb 27th 2015 at 5:15:29 PM

Discussing another possible solution to this mess would be derailing? It seems extremely relevant in my eyes.

The only remotely related response out of you that I could find was this:

Doesn't matter if the suggestion was serious or not if no one likes it. The main point was to demonstrate that the argument that you can just have an explaining note isn't pointing in any specific direction.

That doesn't tell me anything about how you actually feel about the idea. That's just you saying, "Well, that wasn't really my point..." And you can't judge that "no one likes it" when only one other person has responded to the idea at all.

Please just give your opinion about the idea (a second time, if that's what you insist) so we can end this silly chase and get back to discussing the topic properly.

edited 27th Feb '15 5:15:55 PM by MrL1193

Rethkir A Trusted Friend in Science and Ponies from the gap between dimensions Since: Mar, 2013
#963: Feb 27th 2015 at 6:15:20 PM

[up] Well, in my humblest opinion, I feel that any note accompanying any image provides additional clutter on the page that is in no way needed or beneficial. Images are supposed to be quick to understand and concise. And it also raises a few logistical issues. First, where would we put the note? Above the image? Above the caption? Below the caption? note  And also, what would it say?

"Because of TV Trope's official policy, this image has been altered to conform to non-manga reader's western expectations and so now reads left to right. So if you are accustomed to manga, the reading order of this image is now ''backwards''. We apologize for this inconvenience."

On any English-based website with a western audience that is not focused on a right-to-left medium, all text is expected to read from left to right, even if it's in an image. Period.

edited 27th Feb '15 6:16:15 PM by Rethkir

Image Source. Please update whenever an image is changed.
ObsidianFire Since: May, 2014 Relationship Status: Not caught up in your love affair
#964: Feb 27th 2015 at 6:39:38 PM

[up]This. I only have a problem with having unflipped images because it causes my reading speed to grind to a halt when an image doesn't read correctly. Flipping them would fix that.

MrL1193 Since: Apr, 2013
#965: Feb 27th 2015 at 6:47:18 PM

What I had in mind was something along the lines of a second caption. After all, we already do this with fanart (such as on Digital Avatar).

For instance, on Explaining Your Power to the Enemy, it might look something like this:

[[quote:310:]]

It's only fair, right?
Image flipped to read left-to-right.

(In the rare event that a flipped image is also fanart, we could combine both those notes in the secondary caption: "Image flipped to read left-to-right. Art by ____. Used with permission.")

We have already established that at least some of us have been confused by flipped images before. Rightly or wrongly, we don't automatically assume that since we're browsing an English website, any manga images will be altered to read left-to-right, and it stands to reason that others would think likewise.

As for whether or not the notes would be beneficial, I know a simple note like that would help me, for what it's worth. And I'm sure everyone else who supported the "Notes only, no flipping" option would have to agree, since they've been arguing this whole time that the notes alone should be enough to help non-manga readers.

Yes, it would add a bit more clutter to some pages, but hardly any more than the "Art by ___" notes we're already using. Could you not make that small concession to improve the clarity of these images for manga readers?

edited 27th Feb '15 6:47:28 PM by MrL1193

Memers Since: Aug, 2013
#966: Feb 27th 2015 at 6:54:32 PM

[up][up][up]I wholeheartedly disagree.

Those who know manga, which is a greater number than you think, flipping causes problems for them too since they see the image and read it how it is supposed to be read. Those who don't read manga will most likely already know about it or can learn about it now.

Speaking of which, why don't we have a page on Manga flipping, why it is bad and what works were published flipped and such? We could just pothole to that [1]. It was a very big deal in the 90s and fans rebelled hardcore back then and its still an issue today.

Heck a page about general layouts and layout differences from comics and yada such as yellow box narration do not exist, western thought bubbles tend to be used to show whispering in manga and so on.

edited 28th Feb '15 12:35:10 AM by Memers

MarqFJA The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer from Deserts of the Middle East (Before Recorded History) Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer
#967: Feb 28th 2015 at 12:21:56 AM

@Another Duck: "Disagree" isn't a useful answer. If a policy is supposed to address a problem, and there is no proof that said problem actually exists (at least, on a scale that justifies coming up with a solution), then there is no reason to adhere to or support said policy to begin with. It's as simple as that.

Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.
AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#968: Feb 28th 2015 at 1:30:10 AM

I've seen it come up once in a while in discussions that people are confused about which way to read it when they're supposed to be read right to left. However, since it's a lower priority issue than actually illustrating the trope and overall image quality relative to the rest of the suggestions, it doesn't crop up nearly as much in discussions as people notice it. That's on top of how there's a fairly small proportion of images where it's even relevant.

The comparision you used there is also inapplicable.

[up][up]Page images are not manga pages. Also not an applicable comparison.

Check out my fanfiction!
JapaneseTeeth Existence Weighed Against Nonbeing from Meinong's jungle Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Mu
Existence Weighed Against Nonbeing
#969: Feb 28th 2015 at 8:57:36 AM

@Memers: I read plenty of manga, and flipping it wouldn't cause any trouble for me, and the reason is this: the vast majority of page images from manga are not complete pages. It's rare that they're even multiple panels. Complaining that flipping changes the panel order doesn't mean much because almost no images have more than one panel.

Honestly, I don't care that much whether we flip or not. I just want to pick something so that all the manga images are consistent rather than having some flipped and some not, because that's more confusing than picking to flip or not flip.

That said, given a choice I would rather go with flipping, for two reasons:

1. It makes the manga-sourced images consistent with all the other comic images. Confusing or not, it looks like crap to have some images go right-to-left and others go left-to-right even though they're all in English. It's even more jarring when ''literally all other text on the site" goes left-to-right.

2. Our #1 priority is clarity. All the arguments about how "flipping is unfaithful to the source material" are irrelevant to the question because "Is the image clear and easily readable?" takes precedence over "Is the image faithful to the source material?". We aren't trying to reproduce the work faithfully, we're trying to demonstrate a trope.

Now, if we decide that we're not going to flip and put a note or whatever, fine. I just want to choose one and stick with it.

Reaction Image Repository
rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#970: Feb 28th 2015 at 9:00:59 AM

I think a note that an image has been edited is a bad precedent.

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
MrL1193 Since: Apr, 2013
#971: Feb 28th 2015 at 7:54:48 PM

I already explained in the earlier thread that this type of edit is different from others that we usually make. Brightened images, collages, and other such edited images do not confuse a portion of our readers. Flipped images do, however—hence the note.

edited 28th Feb '15 7:55:21 PM by MrL1193

rodneyAnonymous Sophisticated as Hell from empty space Since: Aug, 2010
#972: Feb 28th 2015 at 9:24:51 PM

Marq: "If a policy is supposed to address a problem..." I am not saying anything about a problem existing. The "burden of proof" angle is a false choice, that isn't how I see the issue. I think images should be edited in any way that might improve them, including making them read left-to-right if they don't. You want to call a particular kind of edit different, and I strongly disagree.

Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
MarqFJA The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer from Deserts of the Middle East (Before Recorded History) Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer
#973: Mar 1st 2015 at 1:13:44 AM

Saying "might improve" implies that there is a deficiency in the element that you seek to modify, else there would be no room for "improvement". That counts as "addressing a problem".

Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.
JapaneseTeeth Existence Weighed Against Nonbeing from Meinong's jungle Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Mu
Existence Weighed Against Nonbeing
#974: Mar 2nd 2015 at 5:35:51 AM

Brightened images, collages, and other such edited images do not confuse a portion of our readers. Flipped images do, however—hence the note.

See, this I disagree with. Very few people are going to come across a left-to-right image and be confused because they realize it's from a manga and therefore should be read right-to-left. Pretty much anyone who's a native speaker of a left-to-right language will default to that. I'd think that having a RTL image would confuse more people than the alternative.

Reaction Image Repository
MrL1193 Since: Apr, 2013
#975: Mar 2nd 2015 at 3:31:16 PM

[up] I was talking about flipping the image and adding a note pointing out the change there; it was an explanation of why I reject rodneyAnonymous's assertion that flipping the image is no different from, say, making it brighter. As far as clarity alone goes, since you would ultimately get your wish of having the image flipped, I don't think you would need to worry about all the people who default to reading left-to-right unless you find the second caption box to be a stylistic abomination (or at least more of one than the ones we already use for fanart).

edited 2nd Mar '15 3:32:00 PM by MrL1193


Total posts: 9,732
Top