Quotes: Character Derailment
We had seen Lennier sacrifice his well-being and almost die to save Peter Jurasik's character, who was the epitome of a Nazi war criminal
at the time. So we'd seen that this noble character would sacrifice his life for any lifeform. Jump ahead to the Fifth Season: Lennier sees Sheridan in this life-or-death situation
(but if you pull back in wide and look at that shot, there's also a fellow Ranger
in that tunnel) ...And, y'know. He chooses to let this fellow Ranger and
Sheridan die. —And then he changes his mind like a wimp
and goes to undo it, and it's too late 'cause Sheridan's already gotten himself
out of the mess, and then he turns to the Dark Side and goes off and banishes himself like a whiny wimp
. I wasn't happy with the end.
The ending that had initially been created I was fairly comfortable with. But the head of the studio
suggested some revisions on the ending. What do you do? I wasnít as happy with the revisions, but itís not my show, you have to sort of adjust, even if sometimes it does seem a bit of a contradiction in terms for what your character is supposed to be about.
, Joey was a womanizer, but we enjoyed his exploits. He was a solid friend, a guy you knew you could count on. Joey was deconstructed to be a guy who couldn't get a job, couldn't ask a girl out. He became a pathetic, mopey character. I felt he was moving in the wrong direction, but I was not heard.
—Kevin S. Bright
on the reason behind Joey
I was strongly against it! I donít think WCW
understood what the mask meant to me, to my fans and to my family. It was a very bad move on their behalf. The fans wanted Rey Mysterio with the mask and losing it hurt me a lot. It was also frustrating that it didnít come as the climax to a feud with another masked wrestler, but in a throwaway match. I think the fans understand that I was in a position where I had no option. I either had to lose my mask or lose my job.
See, after six years of a series that was explicitly about refusing to kill, rejecting the very idea because she had personal knowledge of what it meant
, Cassandra shows up in Robin
leading the League of Assassins and talking about how itís time to kill people.
As you might expect, this did not sit very well
It happened during Adam Beechen and Freddie E. Williams IIís run, and they were pretty much immediately reviled for it, and not without reason...It ended up all being retconned as Cassandra getting dosed with mind-control serum by Deathstroke
(ugh), which is about as sloppy a reset button
as you could ask for, and actually ended up making the whole thing seem worse, even if it made it very easy to gloss over and forget. But still, the damage had been done.
How does this happen?! It's as if someone just completely rewrote your characteristics for the sake of creating pointless drama, regardless of everything you've ever said or did before this point!
We cut away from Duncanís mopefest to see Methos. Donít cheer Ė Methos, one of the most likable and charismatic characters
in the series, is a complete asshole throughout this movie. In fact, thereís another guy who wanted this film to be something good: Peter Wingfield actually cried
when given the chance to reprise his role as Methos. Or maybe he cried when he read the script
— I know I would have.
The major change, of course, is that Lois
has a child and is engaged to another man, Richard White. But, for the purposes of this movie, all that pales in comparison to the fact that she also wrote an article for an article called 'Why The World Doesnít Need Superman.' Which is pretty much just played off as something she wrote because she was mad Superman left without saying goodbye. So thatís two
characters undermined in one scene! Three, if you count Jimmy Olsen
being a jerk and eating Clarkís Welcome Back cake.
The core of the problem was the decision to put so many eggs in one basket. Nobody has ever really offered a clear explanation for why Nathan-Turner
decided that Colin Baker
ís debut should be moved up to the end of Season 21 instead of the start of Season 22. Itís a strange idea, particularly in contrast to how Davison
was introduced. With Davison they went out of their way to give him three stories to practice before his debut so that heíd know where he was going with the character. Now, with Colin Baker, who, while not the crap actor heís belittled as by some, is not as good as Peter Davison
, they dump him in the role with less prep time and expect his first time out of the gate to set the tone of the character for nine months... I donít really think 'make your lead character unlikable
' was ever going to be a winning strategy — 'make your character unlikable and then put yourself in a situation where the first impression matters more than ever
to the success of your show' is an idea that almost weaponizes stupidity.
Then comes the only allusion to the backlash this episode received when it first aired. It starts with John Billingsley talking about what he thinks the episode tried to say: "Gee, you know, all these people on the ship are probably pretty horny! How do you think they deal with that?"
But because they "put that into the captain"
, fans "got a little upset about that, because the captain is supposed to be strong, and rock-ribbed, and isn't going to be easily swayed by these feelings of sexual tension."
And that's the only indication in this entire featurette that maybe, just maybe, some viewers were somewhat unhappy with the way the episode turned out.
I wish I could list all the reasons Billingsley is wrong (starting with the fact that all of the other Trek
captains have been swayed by feelings of "sexual tension", and they didn't turn into whiney little babies over it
), but I'm so very tired.
In his best selling book, Have a Nice Day: A Tale of Blood and Sweatsocks
, Mick Foley
went into great detail about how WCW
butchered his career over and over again. He went into great detail about a series of skits known as 'Lost in Cleveland', which has in turn led to many requests for it to be covered here at WrestleCrap.
I vaguely remembered the skits. And now that I in the midst of recapping them, I wish that vague recollection is still all I had
. And Iím sure Mick feels exactly the same.
I can see what they saw in him. They choose a Guy to put their momentum behind; to be The Guy who carries them into the next era, so to speak. John Cena
's been The Guy. So they're hoping to find their next Guy. Roman Reigns
(they're hoping) is their Guy. You can tell.
I don't think it's gonna happen. He's not The Guy, at least not anymore. It's not gonna take. For one—I hate to say he's not good enough, because they've taken worse wrestlers and made them
The Guy—they've done such a bad job presenting him
, I don't think they can fix it.
Rise is about as useful to Tuvok as the British were to Hitler in the Second World War, a complete spanner in the works of his development and taking him in a direction he has already flirted with and sinking him. Heís ridiculously stubborn, sneeringly superior and uses his rank almost as an expression of his ego
. Sometimes it is necessary to step outside the box but Tuvok is so rule and logic bound he cannot see beyond the end of his own nose. When he chastises Neelix for keeping everybodyís spirits high the Talaxian should have cuffed him around the face
...It's enough to make you want to shove him out of the Tether and see if he really is emotionless or will scream on the way down
'Annoying character' goes to T'Pol
, continuing B&B's theme of character assassination of their own
creations. You'd think they were trying to burn the show down for the insurance money.
on Rick Berman and Brannon Braga, "Bounty"
Patty and Selma hate Homer, and who could blame them? (Would you want your baby sister married to him?) But theyíve always been fond, even proud, of Lisa. Here theyíre basically saying to Marge: you married a fat loser and so will your precious daughter,
ha ha. They want Lisa to marry someone like Homer just to teach Marge a lesson or something, and itís utterly contrary to everything we know about them.