Sometimes one set of illustrations for a book or series, especially a classic, becomes so ubiquitous that those images become our cultural idea of what the scene or character "looks like," regardless of how it's described in the text. There are three ways this can work. First, the illustrations may accurately follow the text. (This is generally the case when these illustrations have been vetted by the authors themselves.) Second, the illustrations may include prominent details that don't contradict the text, but also aren't mentioned. Third, the illustrations may outright contradict the textual descriptions.
Examples of illustrations that don't contradict the text:Literature
- John R. Neill's illustrations for the early Land of Oz books.
- Sir John Tenniel's illustrations for Lewis Carroll's works, particularly the Alice in Wonderland books.
- Antoine de Saint-Exupery's The Little Prince, (self-admittedly poorly) drawn by the author himself. Re-illustrated versions are heresy.
- Garth Williams's illustrations of Little House on the Prairie, Charlotte's Web and other children's books.
- The Polar Express is famous for its gorgeous, full-page illustrations, most of which were reproduced in The Film of the Book (it was probably the point of making a movie to begin with).
- Paul Kidby's The Pratchett Portfolio, and subsequent Discworld covers.
- Any other illustrations for Dr. Seuss' books other than his own are practically criminal. All movies adaptations today are expected to resemble at least MOST of his drawings.
- The Zamonia books by Walter Moers (such as The 13 ½ Lives of Captain Bluebear, Rumo & His Miraculous Adventures, The City of Dreaming Books and The Alchemaster's Apprentice) all come with the author's own lavish illustrations.
- Munro Leaf supposedly wrote The Story of Ferdinand to offer his friend, the illustrator Robert Lawson, an opportunity to show his talent, and the book accordingly has always been published with the Lawson illustrations.
- Pettson and Findus is illustrated by the author himself.
- Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas includes the iconic and crazed cartoon illustrations of Ralph Steadman. The film adaptation includes a Steadman-drawn Mickey Mouse on the hitchhiker's shirt.
- The Disney animated version of Winnie the Pooh has taken over from the Ernest Shepard illustrations as the "official" look for the characters, but recently, the Shepard "look" has gained a resurgence as the "classic" look for Pooh.
Examples of illustrations that include important details not mentioned in the text:Literature
- Sherlock Holmes and his deerstalker hat, added by Strand artist Sidney Paget (but only when Holmes was in the countryside).
- In the Magic School Bus books, the text and illustrations complement each other, with the illustrations and dialogue frequently including details the text leaves out. For example, the text of most of the books doesn't mention any of the children's names, but they are all worked into the dialogue.
- Going back to Tenniel and Alice in Wonderland, the price tag on the Mad Hatter's hat ("In This Style 10/6", the fraction being ten shillings and sixpence in the old monetary system) was Tenniel's own invention and nowhere to be found on the text. It has been retained in some form or another in almost all adaptations.
- It was also apparently Tenniel's choice to draw the Lion and the Unicorn in Through the Looking-Glass as caricatures of Gladstone and Disraeli.
- Snape is never described as having a beard in Harry Potter, but the goatee Mary Grandpre gave him became Fanon. However, it's been largely superseded by Alan Rickman's portrayal of him in the movies.
- Before the films, a lot of Harry Potter merchandise seemed to copy the look of Mary Grandpre's illustrations, including kind-of-sort-of keeping her "soft geometry" art style.
- Paul Kidby's illustrations to The Last Hero, adding such details as Ponder's "Actually I Am A Rocket Wizard" Fun T-Shirt, now as ubiquitous to the character as the robe that looks like an old-fashioned anorak (which is in the text). Defictionalisation has occured.
- Rudyard Kipling's illustrations to the Just So Stories - which are left out entirely or replaced with new ones in many editions - contain quite a bit of additional information in the accompanying explanations, for instance the names of some characters that are not named in-story (e. g. the Rhinoceros and the Parsee are called Strorks and Pestonjee Bomonjee, respectively) or what happened afterwards (e. g. the Whale and the little 'Stute Fish became good friends again after the Whale got over his temper). One of the illustrations of The Coming of the Armadilloes tells an entirely unconnected story of an expedition to the mouths of the Amazon in the 16th or 17th century.
- For many Dark Sun players, Brom provided the definative look for Athas with his novel and sourcebook covers. When the Fourth Edition campaign guide came out, many called for Wizards of the Coast to hire him for the cover. They didn't.
Examples of illustrations that contradict the text (for instances of lying book covers, see Covers Always Lie):Literature
- Heidi is described as having short, black, curly hair.
- W.W. Denslow's illustrations for The Wonderful Wizard of Oz show a dark-haired Dorothy, while John R. Neill's later illustrations showed Dorothy as a blonde. In a case of First Installment Wins, the Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer film followed the Denslow illustrations, and Adaptation Displacement did the rest.
- The original illustrations from Conan the Barbarian's magazine serialization depict him as the now-stereotypical Loin Cloth-clad brute, but in the actual text what Conan felt to be one of the advantages of his stature was the ability to wear very heavy armor (usually chainmail over leather) while remaining agile and unencumbered.
- The Dark Tower books...in some of them, Jake is described as having blonde hair, but in one illustration has black hair.
- The Pauline Baynes illustrations of The Chronicles of Narnia. She contradicted Lucy's Hair of Gold, Heart of Gold, but people still believed in her chosen colors for the rest of the (never-described) kids enough to complain about the Adaptation Dye-Job when the recent movies gave Peter blond hair and Edmund brown/black hair, the reverse of how she drew them.
- Ciaphas Cain is always depicted in illustrations carrying a Bolt Pistol, despite using a Laspistol in the books. This is apparently deliberate, to reflect the fact that the images are meant to be ridiculously over-the-top propaganda posters.