Follow TV Tropes
I have temporarily commented this out since tropers can\'t seem to agree on whether or not it applies. RebelFalcon, you\'d better explain yourself for adding back the entry without trying to dicuss.
I left my reasoning in the notes.
Tropers/GlitteringWolf said \"He (The God of Light) revived him (Ozma) to be a guide to humanity to harmony and summon him and his brother back. He didn\'t do it for the lulz.\"
I responded with \"It wasn\'t said that Ozma had to guide humanity, just that he would be entrusted with the Relics and summoning the gods back. Both rather pointless considering they (The Brother Gods) can easily check in whenever they want, and could have done so without reviving someone from the dead. Especially considering they pretty much said if they come back, Remnant better be a Utopia or they\'ll nuke the fuck out of it.\"
In addition, it still amounts to the God of Light reviving someone for no justifiable reason, after he explicitely told Salem he would not revive Ozma due to \"disrupting the balance\" between life and death.
The reasoning of Tropers/GlitteringWolf made no sense, I re-added the entry with further explanation, and left my rebuttal in the notes.
Just adding some thoughts as I took out other Hypocrite links since I agreed with Glittering Wolf reason.
Community Showcase More
How well does it match the trope?