[008]
RebelFalcon
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Tropers/[=GlitteringWolf=] said \
to:
Tropers/[=GlitteringWolf=] said \\\"He (The God of Light) revived him (Ozma) to be a guide to humanity to harmony and summon him and his brother back. He didn\\\'t do it for the lulz.\\\"
I responded with \\\"It wasn\\\'t said that Ozma had to guide humanity, just that he would be entrusted with the Relics and summoning the gods back. Both rather pointless considering they (The Brother Gods) can easily check in whenever they want, and could have done so without reviving someone from the dead. Especially considering they pretty much said if they come back, Remnant better be a Utopia or they\\\'ll nuke the fuck out of it.\\\"
In addition, it still amounts to the God of Light reviving someone for no justifiable reason, after he explicitely told Salem he would not revive Ozma due to \\\"disrupting the balance\\\" between life and death.
The reasoning of Tropers/[=GlitteringWolf=] made no sense, I re-added the entry with further explanation, and left my rebuttal in the notes.
I responded with \\\"It wasn\\\'t said that Ozma had to guide humanity, just that he would be entrusted with the Relics and summoning the gods back. Both rather pointless considering they (The Brother Gods) can easily check in whenever they want, and could have done so without reviving someone from the dead. Especially considering they pretty much said if they come back, Remnant better be a Utopia or they\\\'ll nuke the fuck out of it.\\\"
In addition, it still amounts to the God of Light reviving someone for no justifiable reason, after he explicitely told Salem he would not revive Ozma due to \\\"disrupting the balance\\\" between life and death.
The reasoning of Tropers/[=GlitteringWolf=] made no sense, I re-added the entry with further explanation, and left my rebuttal in the notes.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Tropers/{=GlitteringWolf=} said \
to:
Tropers/[=GlitteringWolf=] said \\\"He (The God of Light) revived him to be a guide to humanity to harmony and summon him and his brother back. He didn\\\'t do it for the lulz.\\\"
I responded with \\\"It wasn\\\'t said that Ozma had to guide humanity, just that he would be entrusted with the Relics and summoning the gods back. Both rather pointless considering they (The Brother Gods) can easily check in whenever they want, and could have done so without reviving someone from the dead. Especially considering they pretty much said if they come back, Remnant better be a Utopia or they\\\'ll nuke the fuck out of it.\\\"
In addition, it still amounts to the God of Light reviving someone for no justifiable reason, after he explicitely told Salem he would not revive Ozma due to \\\"disrupting the balance\\\" between life and death.
The reasoning of Tropers/[=GlitteringWolf=] made no sense, I re-added the entry with further explanation, and left my rebuttal in the notes.
I responded with \\\"It wasn\\\'t said that Ozma had to guide humanity, just that he would be entrusted with the Relics and summoning the gods back. Both rather pointless considering they (The Brother Gods) can easily check in whenever they want, and could have done so without reviving someone from the dead. Especially considering they pretty much said if they come back, Remnant better be a Utopia or they\\\'ll nuke the fuck out of it.\\\"
In addition, it still amounts to the God of Light reviving someone for no justifiable reason, after he explicitely told Salem he would not revive Ozma due to \\\"disrupting the balance\\\" between life and death.
The reasoning of Tropers/[=GlitteringWolf=] made no sense, I re-added the entry with further explanation, and left my rebuttal in the notes.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Tropers/{{GlitteringWolf}} said \
to:
Tropers/{=GlitteringWolf=} said \\\"He (The God of Light) revived him to be a guide to humanity to harmony and summon him and his brother back. He didn\\\'t do it for the lulz.\\\"
I responded with \\\"It wasn\\\'t said that Ozma had to guide humanity, just that he would be entrusted with the Relics and summoning the gods back. Both rather pointless considering they (The Brother Gods) can easily check in whenever they want, and could have done so without reviving someone from the dead. Especially considering they pretty much said if they come back, Remnant better be a Utopia or they\\\'ll nuke the fuck out of it.\\\"
In addition, it still amounts to the God of Light reviving someone for no justifiable reason, after he explicitely told Salem he would not revive Ozma due to \\\"disrupting the balance\\\" between life and death.
The reasoning of Tropers/{{GlitteringWolf}} made no sense, I re-added the entry with further explanation, and left my rebuttal in the notes.
I responded with \\\"It wasn\\\'t said that Ozma had to guide humanity, just that he would be entrusted with the Relics and summoning the gods back. Both rather pointless considering they (The Brother Gods) can easily check in whenever they want, and could have done so without reviving someone from the dead. Especially considering they pretty much said if they come back, Remnant better be a Utopia or they\\\'ll nuke the fuck out of it.\\\"
In addition, it still amounts to the God of Light reviving someone for no justifiable reason, after he explicitely told Salem he would not revive Ozma due to \\\"disrupting the balance\\\" between life and death.
The reasoning of Tropers/{{GlitteringWolf}} made no sense, I re-added the entry with further explanation, and left my rebuttal in the notes.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Tropers/GlitteringWolf said \
to:
Tropers/{{GlitteringWolf}} said \\\"He (The God of Light) revived him to be a guide to humanity to harmony and summon him and his brother back. He didn\\\'t do it for the lulz.\\\"
I responded with \\\"It wasn\\\'t said that Ozma had to guide humanity, just that he would be entrusted with the Relics and summoning the gods back. Both rather pointless considering they (The Brother Gods) can easily check in whenever they want, and could have done so without reviving someone from the dead. Especially considering they pretty much said if they come back, Remnant better be a Utopia or they\\\'ll nuke the fuck out of it.\\\"
In addition, it still amounts to the God of Light reviving someone for no justifiable reason, after he explicitely told Salem he would not revive Ozma due to \\\"disrupting the balance\\\" between life and death.
The reasoning of Tropers/{{GlitteringWolf}} made no sense, I re-added the entry with further explanation, and left my rebuttal in the notes.
I responded with \\\"It wasn\\\'t said that Ozma had to guide humanity, just that he would be entrusted with the Relics and summoning the gods back. Both rather pointless considering they (The Brother Gods) can easily check in whenever they want, and could have done so without reviving someone from the dead. Especially considering they pretty much said if they come back, Remnant better be a Utopia or they\\\'ll nuke the fuck out of it.\\\"
In addition, it still amounts to the God of Light reviving someone for no justifiable reason, after he explicitely told Salem he would not revive Ozma due to \\\"disrupting the balance\\\" between life and death.
The reasoning of Tropers/{{GlitteringWolf}} made no sense, I re-added the entry with further explanation, and left my rebuttal in the notes.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
{{Tropers/GlitteringWolf}} said \
to:
Tropers/GlitteringWolf said \\\"He (The God of Light) revived him to be a guide to humanity to harmony and summon him and his brother back. He didn\\\'t do it for the lulz.\\\"
I responded with \\\"It wasn\\\'t said that Ozma had to guide humanity, just that he would be entrusted with the Relics and summoning the gods back. Both rather pointless considering they (The Brother Gods) can easily check in whenever they want, and could have done so without reviving someone from the dead. Especially considering they pretty much said if they come back, Remnant better be a Utopia or they\\\'ll nuke the fuck out of it.\\\"
In addition, it still amounts to the God of Light reviving someone for no justifiable reason, after he explicitely told Salem he would not revive Ozma due to \\\"disrupting the balance\\\" between life and death.
The reasoning of Tropers/GlitteringWolf made no sense, I re-added the entry with further explanation, and left my rebuttal in the notes.
I responded with \\\"It wasn\\\'t said that Ozma had to guide humanity, just that he would be entrusted with the Relics and summoning the gods back. Both rather pointless considering they (The Brother Gods) can easily check in whenever they want, and could have done so without reviving someone from the dead. Especially considering they pretty much said if they come back, Remnant better be a Utopia or they\\\'ll nuke the fuck out of it.\\\"
In addition, it still amounts to the God of Light reviving someone for no justifiable reason, after he explicitely told Salem he would not revive Ozma due to \\\"disrupting the balance\\\" between life and death.
The reasoning of Tropers/GlitteringWolf made no sense, I re-added the entry with further explanation, and left my rebuttal in the notes.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
{{Troper/GlitteringWolf}} said \
to:
{{Tropers/GlitteringWolf}} said \\\"He (The God of Light) revived him to be a guide to humanity to harmony and summon him and his brother back. He didn\\\'t do it for the lulz.\\\"
I responded with \\\"It wasn\\\'t said that Ozma had to guide humanity, just that he would be entrusted with the Relics and summoning the gods back. Both rather pointless considering they (The Brother Gods) can easily check in whenever they want, and could have done so without reviving someone from the dead. Especially considering they pretty much said if they come back, Remnant better be a Utopia or they\\\'ll nuke the fuck out of it.\\\"
In addition, it still amounts to the God of Light reviving someone for no justifiable reason, after he explicitely told Salem he would not revive Ozma due to \\\"disrupting the balance\\\" between life and death.
The reasoning of {{Tropers/GlitteringWolf}} made no sense, I re-added the entry with further explanation, and left my rebuttal in the notes.
I responded with \\\"It wasn\\\'t said that Ozma had to guide humanity, just that he would be entrusted with the Relics and summoning the gods back. Both rather pointless considering they (The Brother Gods) can easily check in whenever they want, and could have done so without reviving someone from the dead. Especially considering they pretty much said if they come back, Remnant better be a Utopia or they\\\'ll nuke the fuck out of it.\\\"
In addition, it still amounts to the God of Light reviving someone for no justifiable reason, after he explicitely told Salem he would not revive Ozma due to \\\"disrupting the balance\\\" between life and death.
The reasoning of {{Tropers/GlitteringWolf}} made no sense, I re-added the entry with further explanation, and left my rebuttal in the notes.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Troper/GlitteringWolf said \
to:
{{Troper/GlitteringWolf}} said \\\"He (The God of Light) revived him to be a guide to humanity to harmony and summon him and his brother back. He didn\\\'t do it for the lulz.\\\"
I responded with \\\"It wasn\\\'t said that Ozma had to guide humanity, just that he would be entrusted with the Relics and summoning the gods back. Both rather pointless considering they (The Brother Gods) can easily check in whenever they want, and could have done so without reviving someone from the dead. Especially considering they pretty much said if they come back, Remnant better be a Utopia or they\\\'ll nuke the fuck out of it.\\\"
In addition, it still amounts to the God of Light reviving someone for no justifiable reason, after he explicitely told Salem he would not revive Ozma due to \\\"disrupting the balance\\\" between life and death.
The reasoning of {{Troper/GlitteringWolf}} made no sense, I re-added the entry with further explanation, and left my rebuttal in the notes.
I responded with \\\"It wasn\\\'t said that Ozma had to guide humanity, just that he would be entrusted with the Relics and summoning the gods back. Both rather pointless considering they (The Brother Gods) can easily check in whenever they want, and could have done so without reviving someone from the dead. Especially considering they pretty much said if they come back, Remnant better be a Utopia or they\\\'ll nuke the fuck out of it.\\\"
In addition, it still amounts to the God of Light reviving someone for no justifiable reason, after he explicitely told Salem he would not revive Ozma due to \\\"disrupting the balance\\\" between life and death.
The reasoning of {{Troper/GlitteringWolf}} made no sense, I re-added the entry with further explanation, and left my rebuttal in the notes.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
GlitterWolf said \
to:
Troper/GlitteringWolf said \\\"He (The God of Light) revived him to be a guide to humanity to harmony and summon him and his brother back. He didn\\\'t do it for the lulz.\\\"
I responded with \\\"It wasn\\\'t said that Ozma had to guide humanity, just that he would be entrusted with the Relics and summoning the gods back. Both rather pointless considering they (The Brother Gods) can easily check in whenever they want, and could have done so without reviving someone from the dead. Especially considering they pretty much said if they come back, Remnant better be a Utopia or they\\\'ll nuke the fuck out of it.\\\"
In addition, it still amounts to the God of Light reviving someone for no justifiable reason, after he explicitely told Salem he would not revive Ozma due to \\\"disrupting the balance\\\" between life and death.
Troper/GlitteringWolf\\\'s reasoning made no sense, I readded the entry with further explanation, and left my rebuttal in the notes.
I responded with \\\"It wasn\\\'t said that Ozma had to guide humanity, just that he would be entrusted with the Relics and summoning the gods back. Both rather pointless considering they (The Brother Gods) can easily check in whenever they want, and could have done so without reviving someone from the dead. Especially considering they pretty much said if they come back, Remnant better be a Utopia or they\\\'ll nuke the fuck out of it.\\\"
In addition, it still amounts to the God of Light reviving someone for no justifiable reason, after he explicitely told Salem he would not revive Ozma due to \\\"disrupting the balance\\\" between life and death.
Troper/GlitteringWolf\\\'s reasoning made no sense, I readded the entry with further explanation, and left my rebuttal in the notes.
