Main Beware The Honest Ones Discussion

Discussion Main / BewareTheHonestOnes

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion

Baconator96 Since: Mar, 2010

Dec 20th 2015 at 2:54:43 AM •••

Does anybody else have a hard time seeing how the laconic description does its job here?

I read it twice before reading the article, then I read it again after the article and it really doesn't come even close to being a good "laconic" description. Can I rewrite it?

If I don't get a reply in 10 days I'm just gonna rewrite it because it is seriously terrible at doing its job.

Hide / Show Replies

SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)

Dec 21st 2015 at 2:29:23 AM •••

Laconics are frequently bad. Might want to ask here about it.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman

Stoogebie Since: Apr, 2011

Jul 22nd 2013 at 8:12:54 PM •••

So suppose there's this one character who is, to be frank, a Non-Action Guy. He's also a Nice Guy...and an Extreme Doormat. So when the bad guy is in a position where this character can kill them, and the former taunts the latter for "not having it in him" to kill them, the character...agrees. And leaves the bad guy to a Fate Worse than Death.

So...would that count as this trope? Or just Beware the Nice Ones?

Edited by 69.172.221.4

Archived Discussion


Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known. If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page. The next one might be easier to see.

Discussion Main / BewareTheHonestOnes