[002]
Larkmarn
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Because I ''specifically'' said that if Lily is conflating
to:
Because I \'\'specifically\'\' said that if Lily is conflating \"right-wing viewpoints\" and \"anti-feminist movements\" then they can be combined, but it would be explained.
Instead, you choose to passive-aggressively readd it with as little context as possible. In fact it\'s still a ZeroContextExample. Between the entry you deleted and your posts in this discussion, there\'s more than enough for ample context.
So I ask you [[SincerityMode why are you trying to make this entry as vague as possible?]] None of this would have happened if context was provided on the original \"right-wing viewpoints\" entry. I get (and very much respect) trying to keep the page neutral and remove creator-bashing. I honestly appreciate most of what you\'ve done for this page. But I find myself baffled by your decisions on this matter.
EDIT: Edited to clarify whom I\'m addressing.
Instead, you choose to passive-aggressively readd it with as little context as possible. In fact it\'s still a ZeroContextExample. Between the entry you deleted and your posts in this discussion, there\'s more than enough for ample context.
So I ask you [[SincerityMode why are you trying to make this entry as vague as possible?]] None of this would have happened if context was provided on the original \"right-wing viewpoints\" entry. I get (and very much respect) trying to keep the page neutral and remove creator-bashing. I honestly appreciate most of what you\'ve done for this page. But I find myself baffled by your decisions on this matter.
EDIT: Edited to clarify whom I\'m addressing.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
So, in all seriousness, have you been reading my posts?
to:
^^ So, in all seriousness, have you been reading my posts?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Because I ''specifically'' said that if Lily is conflating
to:
Because I \'\'specifically\'\' said that if Lily is conflating \"right-wing viewpoints\" and \"anti-feminist movements\" then they can be combined, but it would be explained.
Instead, you choose to passive-aggressively readd it with as little context as possible. In fact it\'s still a ZeroContextExample. Between the entry you deleted and your posts in this discussion, there\'s more than enough for ample context.
So I ask you [[SincerityMode why are you trying to make this entry as vague as possible?]] None of this would have happened if context was provided on the original \"right-wing viewpoints\" entry. I get (and very much respect) trying to keep the page neutral and remove creator-bashing. I honestly appreciate most of what you\'ve done for this page. But I find myself baffled by your decisions on this matter.
Instead, you choose to passive-aggressively readd it with as little context as possible. In fact it\'s still a ZeroContextExample. Between the entry you deleted and your posts in this discussion, there\'s more than enough for ample context.
So I ask you [[SincerityMode why are you trying to make this entry as vague as possible?]] None of this would have happened if context was provided on the original \"right-wing viewpoints\" entry. I get (and very much respect) trying to keep the page neutral and remove creator-bashing. I honestly appreciate most of what you\'ve done for this page. But I find myself baffled by your decisions on this matter.
