Follow TV Tropes

Ask The Tropers

Go To

Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help. It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread for ongoing cleanup projects.

Ask the Tropers:

Trope Related Question:

Make Private (For security bugs or stuff only for moderators)

MichaelKatsuro Since: Apr, 2011
29th Mar, 2021 07:58:54 AM

And now she's edit warring again, re-adding the word "vastly" just minutes after I removed it.

gjjones Since: Jul, 2016
29th Mar, 2021 08:04:07 AM

Did you try sending her a PM?

He/His/Him. No matter who you are, always Be Yourself.
MichaelKatsuro Since: Apr, 2011
29th Mar, 2021 08:05:09 AM

Yes, multiple times.

iamconstantine Since: Aug, 2014
29th Mar, 2021 08:37:44 AM

Considering the number of times this Troper has been reported, for various reasons, I think this might be a lost cause here. This Troper doesn't seem to want to abide by any site rules.

MichaelKatsuro Since: Apr, 2011
29th Mar, 2021 08:45:21 AM

Yeah, her usual habit is to break the rules, apologize, break the same rules again, apologize, break the same rules yet again...

PrincessPandaTrope Since: Jan, 2017
29th Mar, 2021 08:48:03 AM

I didn't meant to edit war. I didn't know "vastly" was there before. I would've asked beforehand if I did know.

I keep thinking that being deliberately inaccurate when writing about one's work is rude to its creator, especially when it comes to sensitive issues such as sexual abuse and nudity or sexual content that I worry would be too much for children, so I can act quite rude to people I think are being rude. I apologize for coming off that way and should've assumed good faith. I'll act that way from now on.

Myself being a rebel who deliberately breaks the rules is not true. I do want to abide by the rules and would not break them if if I knew they are rules. However, I am quite simple-minded, so I may skirt the lines if they're not obvious to me.

Does this mean I'll be suspended or even permanently banned?

Edited by PrincessPandaTrope Content Warning: My posts may involve my actions dealing with R-rated or Not Safe For Work content. Same for my edit history.
iamconstantine Since: Aug, 2014
29th Mar, 2021 08:54:58 AM

We don't decide if you're suspended, the mods do. The issue is not just this one specific instance, it's your repeated pattern of break the rules, apologize, break the rules again. It's understandable to make mistakes, but it seems you're not trying to familiarize yourself with the rules beforehand. There are several Administrivia pages explaining how things work on the wiki.

Like I said, it's not our call, but the mods usually don't take kindly to people who have to be corrected time and again.

Also, I can't speak to the content of the work, but I don't see how deleting or changing an adjective suddenly misrepresents it.

Edited by iamconstantine
MichaelKatsuro Since: Apr, 2011
29th Mar, 2021 08:55:24 AM

Nobody's being deliberately inaccurate. There's nothing inaccurate about not using the word "very". If I say that North America is a big place, that's not inaccurate just because I could have said "very big" or "enormous". Inaccuracy is saying things that aren't true.

On the subject of "vastly," I realize that I've made a mistake. You added it to a different entry than I removed it from, and I didn't realize that. I'm sorry that I falsely accused you; that one's entirely my fault and you did nothing wrong.

Edited by MichaelKatsuro
mightymewtron Since: Oct, 2012
29th Mar, 2021 09:23:18 AM

I don't think it's the end of the world if something says "very big" instead of "big" (if it serves a purpose it's not Weasel Words; I would prefer the former in the case where the house's largeness is meant to be emphasized as uncanny, like for a trope like Bigger on the Inside) but it's not worth snapping at somebody for removing it either.

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
MichaelKatsuro Since: Apr, 2011
29th Mar, 2021 09:48:59 AM

The thing is, "very" is the kind of word that doesn't have much of an effect on the reader. Not nearly as much as writers often think.

Like... imagine that it says "Harry quickly ran over to Ron's unconscious body." Okay, it's clear that he's in a hurry. If you'd write "Harry very quickly ran over to Ron's unconscious body," that doesn't make much of a difference. There's no clear difference between "quickly" and "very quickly."

Now, if you say that he ran "as quickly as he could," that tells people something. If you say he ran "quicker than he ever had before," that tells people something too. But "very quickly" says almost nothing. There's no way for the reader to know which velocity the writer defines as the minimum required to qualify as "very quickly".

mightymewtron Since: Oct, 2012
29th Mar, 2021 10:21:13 AM

^ You're applying it to an adverb instead of an adjective in this case, so I think that affects how it flows. "The house is big" and "The house is very big" do create different images in my mind. I do agree that maybe it would've just made the page better to substitute "very big" with another word like "gigantic" or "enormous" instead of just leaving the blandest possible word. So I do understand where Princess is coming from, though I still think she was being possessive and resistant to change.

Edited by mightymewtron I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
Top