Follow TV Tropes

Following

Privacy, Government, Surveillance, and You.

Go To

TheHandle United Earth from Stockholm Since: Jan, 2012 Relationship Status: YOU'RE TEARING ME APART LISA
United Earth
#4076: Nov 26th 2017 at 2:19:59 PM

Speaking of cops planting stuff on you

Honestly I think it's more terrifying than funny.

Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
Ominae Organized Canine Bureau Special Agent Since: Jul, 2010
Organized Canine Bureau Special Agent
#4077: Dec 10th 2017 at 2:06:36 AM

http://opinion.inquirer.net/109359/controversial-national-id-system

A Filipino perspective on why the national ID System is not done.

"Exit muna si Polgas. Ang kailangan dito ay si Dobermaxx!"
DeMarquis Who Am I? from Hell, USA Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: Buried in snow, waiting for spring
Who Am I?
#4078: Jan 14th 2018 at 4:24:39 PM

House Extends Surveillance Law, Rejecting New Privacy Safeguards: "...The House of Representatives voted on Thursday to extend the National Security Agency’s warrantless surveillance program for six years with minimal changes, rejecting a push by a bipartisan group of lawmakers to impose significant privacy limits when it sweeps up Americans’ emails and other personal communications."

So, don't delete your encryption software just yet...

Why the President's FISA Fix Is Bad News For Privacy, Good News for Russian Agents: "...Thursday brought President Trump two things he sought: new restrictions on how and when the U.S. government can reveal the names of Americans who come to the attention of intelligence agencies, and a House vote to reauthorize the law that permits those agencies to eavesdrop on foreigners and virtually any American they speak to."

In addition to all that, turns out that there are some disquiting implications of the new law for corruption investigations.

The privacy concerns at the heart of the FISA renewal debate A PBS article that discusses some of the implications for privacy, and why we should care:

"... Right, so really their fundamental concern is that this information was collected without a warrant in a very specific context, a context related to foreign intelligence.

So, what they are concerned with is, that if that justification doesn’t follow through all the way to the end, that might allow law enforcement to look at otherwise protected communications for regular criminal prosecution purposes, and without ever getting that warrant, and that that is not appropriate or acceptable under the Fourth Amendment."

"We learn from history that we do not learn from history."
Wariolander Since: Nov, 2017
#4079: Jan 18th 2018 at 10:16:40 PM

NVM.

edited 18th Jan '18 10:27:01 PM by Wariolander

speedyboris Since: Feb, 2010
#4080: Jan 19th 2018 at 5:03:20 AM

Anyone who doesn't think Trump will abuse this new power to go after political opponents or critics is only kidding themselves.

Silasw A procrastination in of itself from a handcart heading to Hell Since: Mar, 2011 Relationship Status: And they all lived happily ever after <3
A procrastination in of itself
#4081: Jan 19th 2018 at 5:27:40 AM

Trump doesn’t personally get the powers, the FBI, CIA and NSA do.

"And the Bunny nails it!" ~ Gabrael "If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we." ~ Cyran
Grafite Since: Apr, 2016 Relationship Status: Less than three
#4082: Jan 19th 2018 at 7:09:34 AM

[up][up] Yes, just look at all the times in the past year when Trump colluded with the intelligence agencies to hunt down political opponents...

This is an extension of a program that was already in place. Plus, surveillance is the thing that has never been used by the president to crack down on the opposition, nor will Trump, but people want to discard it over a whim. The directors of the agencies wouldn't allow him to anyways.

Life is unfair...
DeMarquis Who Am I? from Hell, USA Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: Buried in snow, waiting for spring
Who Am I?
#4083: Jan 19th 2018 at 10:11:25 AM

The Obama admin did abuse surveillance powers for political purposes, as has probably every presidential administration. The FBI has a well documented history of using surveillance to supress dissent.

"We learn from history that we do not learn from history."
speedyboris Since: Feb, 2010
#4084: Jan 19th 2018 at 3:09:26 PM

[up]x3 This is true; however, let's not forget that Trump wants to "restore the FBI to greatness"; presumably that means firing the current top staff and replacing them with people loyal to himself. Same would hold true for the other three letter agencies if he had his way.

BlueNinja0 The Mod with the Migraine from Taking a left at Albuquerque Since: Dec, 2010 Relationship Status: Showing feelings of an almost human nature
The Mod with the Migraine
#4085: Jan 24th 2018 at 2:27:10 AM

And in an article I should probablyjust did cross-post to the Privacy thread, Apple will be denying the use of iCloud to users who don't agree to have their data shared with the Chinese government, thanks to the new data center being built with a Communist-Party owned computing company. Full article text 

Apple is selling out. It’s not about the latest version of the iPhone, but the huge cache of personal data that will go directly to the Communist government of China.

Apple’s policies in China have far-reaching implications for us all. Last summer, Apple announced it would be partnering with Guizhou-Cloud Big Data, a state-owned company with Communist Party connections, to build Apple’s first data-storage center in China. Customers registered in China, according to Apple’s new terms and conditions agreement for the country, must “understand and agree that Apple and G.C.B.D. will have access to all data that you store on this service.”

Under the agreement, Apple seems to be absolving itself of responsibility for what the authorities may choose to do with personal data in G.C.B.D.’s hands. Users who refuse Apple’s terms will be denied iCloud services. Users who accept run the risk of unwittingly provoking the ire of the aggressive police state, resulting in deleted data or accounts, or harassment and imprisonment. This kind of partnership between an American company and a dictatorial regime is at odds with the image Apple has built as a company committed to privacy and a willingness to stand up to pressure from larger entities like the United States government.

Unfortunately, it now seems that such “values” are taking a back seat to profits. The Chinese regime makes no apologies about its human rights violations and seems not to care whom it crushes in its quest for power and control. When dealing with the Chinese regime, American companies should likewise not apologize for their commitment to the fundamental values — human rights, democracy, freedom of information, the rule of law — that have allowed them to flourish.

It’s hard to believe that Apple is caving in to the regime like this. The only conclusion I am left to draw is that the company is O.K. with taking part in the suppression of freedoms abroad while espousing high-minded values at home. To be fair, many American tech companies have been tripping over themselves to get into China. Facebook has reportedly been developing censorship software so that it can win approval to operate in China, while the company’s chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg, has long been courting the Chinese leadership.

The Chinese people have been fighting for human rights for decades, including the rights to privacy, freedom of speech and democracy. Many have lost their lives doing so. Instead of aiding dictatorships and following a misguided path to the future, Apple should return to its core values and protect the rights of its users at home and abroad.

edited 24th Jan '18 2:33:48 AM by BlueNinja0

That’s the epitome of privilege right there, not considering armed nazis a threat to your life. - Silasw
TerminusEst from the Land of Winter and Stars Since: Feb, 2010
#4086: Jan 24th 2018 at 2:45:18 AM

[up]

Here's the link as well. Apple has been trying to get into China for so long it was only a matter of time.

edited 24th Jan '18 2:45:44 AM by TerminusEst

Si Vis Pacem, Para Perkele
IFwanderer use political terms to describe, not insult from Earth Since: Aug, 2013 Relationship Status: Wishfully thinking
use political terms to describe, not insult
#4087: Jan 24th 2018 at 5:03:59 PM

Crossposting to Trolling, Free Speech and the Law and to US politics for relevance: potentially NSFW {Motherboard} We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now. So, a pervert on the internet created a face-swap technology to put faces of celebrities on porn videos and released it as an app. As the article shows below, it can be used for other kinds of video faceswaps (the example given is a guy who face-swapped Hitler for Argentine president Mauricio Macri). This obviously has worrisome implications for politics worldwide, imagine a pizzagate-style hoax in 2020, but with a fake video of the candidate supposedly making a deal on video.

edited 24th Jan '18 5:04:45 PM by IFwanderer

1 2 We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be. -KV
speedyboris Since: Feb, 2010
#4088: Feb 2nd 2018 at 3:11:02 PM

Surprised this hasn't been posted yet:

If Workers Slack Off, the Wristband Will Know. (And Amazon Has a Patent for It.)

This, combined with another article I read about a Madison, WI company which introduced optional chip implants to its workers (and staggeringly, many of them opted into it voluntarily!) really makes me think how bleak the future workplace is getting, especially since corporations employ a good chunk of the American workforce and are protected to get away with this sort of thing.

The next logical step will be a mandatory chip implant from the government that will be required if you want a job or to buy anything. And when that comes... we'll be in deep shit.

edited 2nd Feb '18 3:13:30 PM by speedyboris

Quag15 Since: Mar, 2012
#4089: Feb 2nd 2018 at 3:19:02 PM

and staggeringly, many of them opted into it voluntarily!

Did their bosses/managers persuaded them to adhere to such a thing? ''Or else?'' note 

speedyboris Since: Feb, 2010
#4090: Feb 2nd 2018 at 3:21:08 PM

I don't believe so (for now).

Here's the article on that story, BTW.

edited 2nd Feb '18 3:22:04 PM by speedyboris

Ominae Organized Canine Bureau Special Agent Since: Jul, 2010
Organized Canine Bureau Special Agent
#4091: Mar 31st 2018 at 2:33:30 AM

There’s some big plans for applying visas to America with linking to someone’s social media:

https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-us-canada-43601557

"Exit muna si Polgas. Ang kailangan dito ay si Dobermaxx!"
TheHandle United Earth from Stockholm Since: Jan, 2012 Relationship Status: YOU'RE TEARING ME APART LISA
United Earth
#4092: Mar 31st 2018 at 3:15:14 AM

Yep, not coming to visit anytime soon.

Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
Ominae Organized Canine Bureau Special Agent Since: Jul, 2010
Organized Canine Bureau Special Agent
#4093: Mar 31st 2018 at 4:14:37 AM

Lucky for those who come from visa-exempt countries like Canada, Japan and Singapore, they don’t need to go through this.

edited 31st Mar '18 4:29:52 AM by Ominae

"Exit muna si Polgas. Ang kailangan dito ay si Dobermaxx!"
speedyboris Since: Feb, 2010
#4094: Mar 31st 2018 at 5:22:21 AM

I've asked this before: If you don't have any social media accounts to begin with, would they still let you in? Or is that going to be deemed MORE suspicious?

TheHandle United Earth from Stockholm Since: Jan, 2012 Relationship Status: YOU'RE TEARING ME APART LISA
United Earth
#4095: Mar 31st 2018 at 5:41:37 AM

It's like credit ratings.

Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
Ominae Organized Canine Bureau Special Agent Since: Jul, 2010
Organized Canine Bureau Special Agent
#4096: Mar 31st 2018 at 7:49:51 AM

Proposal is not clear on that one, but it also includes getting basic details from five years like whether your phone numbers changed or not for example.

The BBC link I posted has more info on that matter.

"Exit muna si Polgas. Ang kailangan dito ay si Dobermaxx!"
DeMarquis Who Am I? from Hell, USA Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: Buried in snow, waiting for spring
Who Am I?
#4097: Mar 31st 2018 at 9:41:13 AM

Not sure how they intend to enforce this. Seems like it would be pretty easy to get around.

edited 31st Mar '18 9:41:41 AM by DeMarquis

"We learn from history that we do not learn from history."
Wariolander Since: Nov, 2017
#4098: Mar 31st 2018 at 4:31:58 PM

[up]x4 I'm wondering what happens if you don't have a social media account either. Seems like Trump and his administration didn't consider that a possibility (Because EVERYONE has a social media account these days). I'm glad I don't have a Social Media account (well, my mom created a Facebook account for me a long time ago, but I've never actually used it, and I briefly had a Twitter account, but quickly deleted it).

DeMarquis Who Am I? from Hell, USA Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: Buried in snow, waiting for spring
Who Am I?
#4099: Mar 31st 2018 at 5:06:25 PM

For example, if you simply dont mention that you happen to have an avatar on TV Tropes, is anyone really going to invest the time and energy to check? And how would they do that?

"We learn from history that we do not learn from history."
Fighteer Lost in Space from The Time Vortex (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
Lost in Space
#4100: Apr 6th 2018 at 7:03:27 AM

[TPM]: Is Facebook in More Trouble Than People Think?

TLDR: Facebook appears to be rejiggering its algorithms that target advertising towards its users due to concerns about the privacy of user data being shared with advertisers. This is creating some volatility in the effectiveness of ads on the platform, and is causing some concern among advertisers that they may not be getting the same high value that they were used to. Since ads are Facebook's primary source of market value, declines in the perceived value of advertising on the platform, or even a failure to continually increase the value, could deal the company a crippling financial blow.

These actions are coming at least partly in anticipation of increasing regulatory scrutiny in various markets, never mind recent political revelations such as the Cambridge Analytica scandal. FB can't simply get away with arbitrarily marketing its users' data any more.

All of this raises some interesting questions. Is the utility of the Facebook platform (or, indeed, any similar social media engine) worth the inherent surrender of privacy that it represents, and will consumers abandon these platforms out of fear that Facebook is manipulating their brains (or allowing them to be manipulated) by sneaky psychological tactics developed using their own profiles? Is this the feared dystopian future of targeted marketing via social media, or will some happy medium be found?

edited 6th Apr '18 7:04:56 AM by Fighteer

"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"

Total posts: 4,767
Top