The Place for Purging Porn and Pedo-Pandering (AKA P5 flag evaluations)

It's supposed to be about nonsexual examples of accidental underwear exposure; you know, stuff like that Coppertone girl poster. It's supposed to be about innocence, in other words. Somehow, it would up becoming unnecessarily lewd and fetishizing over little girls.

edited 2nd May '12 4:59:04 PM by Komodin

No. That's what it became. The trope was basically that little kids run around in their underwear sometimes, and it's a sign of innocence, and not giving a damn, because you're a kid, and life is fun. Unfortunately, that's a magnet for stuff that we didn't want.

Ninjas everywhere.

edited 2nd May '12 4:58:32 PM by BadWolf21

It was a page that was supposed to be for stuff like the Coppertone Girl, y'know the picture on the bottle of suntan lotion with the little girl and the dog◊. In other words, kids in underwear but to look cute, not sexual. And then a bunch of people started lovingly listing every single occurrence of kids in underwear. It was some of the creepiest shit ever. That Crazy Goggins or whatever dude made a video of it, and bam, this whole situation started. It's for the better, of course.

About that, I think it being "sexual" is more subjective of a criteria. When it's "accidentally" exposed, I don't really see a difference of it being sexual or not; that's just something the audience attaches. But the difference between accidental exposure and someone simply being in a partial undressed state is concrete.

That looks more like Innocent Swimwear/Beachwear.

edited 2nd May '12 5:02:48 PM by abstractematics

What? Nothing in fiction is accidental.

And that image or a variation was the page image on Innocent Panties I believe.

edited 2nd May '12 5:04:03 PM by Martello

In any event, it's gone now.

Just curious is Bizzarre Alien Biology being red linked related to the porn/pedo hunt?

oh OK I was worried It got cut because it could be used as an excuse or something.

edited 2nd May '12 5:11:55 PM by Shadis

Personally, though, I wouldn't mind it being brought back... providing it's edit-locked and has to have its potential examples be mod-approved.

I'm terrible at spelling sometimes. Bizarre Alien Biology is fine. I just spelled it wrong.

And I can't find Saya No Uta on any voting list? Is that a glitch or something else?

Nope. It's because you're misspelling "Bizarre".

Ninja'd.

edited 2nd May '12 5:10:09 PM by BadWolf21

@Martello

Actually now that I think about it... Komodin, I don't know if "accidental" is the right word. Accidental is more like when there's strong wind that causes exposure.

From my understanding, the trope's supposed to be about "just someone in undressed state without further implication" instead of "intentionally showing one's or someone's garments".

edited 2nd May '12 5:12:30 PM by abstractematics

Typos. Bizarre Alien Biology Ninjas are sad.

edited 2nd May '12 5:11:30 PM by animeg3282

Since Saya No Uta was cut before this thread was made, it was probably hit for the same reason FSN was, which was being on the wrong index. However, Saya No Uta is a matter for another thread and we've already been yelled at for getting offtopic with it before this forum was even made. I'm going to go flag the page now and the P5 members can vote on it. If Fast Eddie says it stays gone that'll be overridden as necessary.

Fast Eddie said he'll defer to P5 though.

@1309, I could be mistaken, but I think it was cut with the initial Naughty Tentacles purge.

edit- what they said.

edited 2nd May '12 5:16:30 PM by carbon-mantis

The thing is Saya No Uta does not yet have a thread. Could one of the P5 make one?

They'll make one when they get around to it. There are over 200 hundred content violation things to deal with and it was only tagged about five minutes ago.

We'll make a thread on it if we find it questionable instead of just definitely cut-worthy. So in other words, one of the other two might make a thread for it.

So in other other words, don't start arguing about it to me because I already decided on that one way back when I researched it to see why it was cut.

edited 2nd May '12 5:21:23 PM by Martello

Lets change topic to something that is up for a vote how abut Demonbane?

If you decide to cut for pedo please note the idw comic with aged up saya as a replacement.

Demonbane or saya? Demonbane has an all ages version and an anime based on that version saya dose not have an all ages version and trying to make one would be pointless do to gore.

That works.

edited 2nd May '12 5:28:23 PM by Shadis

Are there even any actual sex scenes in Demonbane the game? I can't recall, although I know for a fact that there aren't any in the anime.

edited 2nd May '12 5:29:26 PM by TheFoxsCloak

@Shadis - Yeah, I saw there was an IDW version. That's probably fine but would need its own page. ComicBook.Song Of Saya.

I was referring to Demonbane the game, as I edited in after you asked.

With Catalogue currently unaccounted for, 5P is down to only three members, which isn't an ideal situation.

Anyways, I don't know how many wicks or examples Kodomo No Jikan has, but I definitely don't have the patience to comb through the entire wiki getting rid of every example by myself. There are two cut guro works, on the other hand, that I especially want to go after, provided someone else hasn't gotten to them already. I don't know if they're getting a review or not, but they're two works that I am damned certain aren't going to be coming back to this wiki — if they got reviewed, they'd likely be devil-headed straight to oblivion.

I have the English version and yes it has porn.

edited 2nd May '12 5:34:08 PM by Shadis

I thought the difference between fanservice and porn is that porn is sexual and fanservice is just sexy. That is to say, porn is spank material and fanservice isn't.

One thing I was worried about with both these cleanup projects is a creeping definition of "inappropriate". Was I wrong to worry about that?