The sub-forum is used for discussions that adjudicate possible violations of The Content Policy. Threads here can be created by flagging a page through the sidebar "report" button and toggling "The page may violate the Content Policy".
This thread is for general discussion of pages.
Edited by SeptimusHeap on Sep 10th 2022 at 11:50:32 AM
A pocketful of saudade.
Gendo,
I'm leaning towards cleaning on Esper Mami. It's rather bizarre, but yeah. Is it possible to mark pages officially as "dangerous waters"?
p.s. I read Death Panda and Uziga works before. Easy decision. They're gone now.
The words above are to be read as if they are narrated by Morgan Freeman.
Well, you could just have one of those %% banner warnings that say quite clearly at the top of the page not to gush over the fanservice or your edits will be removed. Or worse.
edited 22nd May '12 9:54:40 AM by Arha
^Actually a pretty good idea in that it removes a good bit of creepiness.
edited 22nd May '12 9:56:03 AM by FastEddie
Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
TV Tropes' Sonic Wiki Curator
![[up]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/smiles/arrow_up.png "[up]"){kind=icon}
Well, that can easily be done. In fact, that should've been done in the first place.
True especially if the rest of the show can be safely watched by 10 year olds.
R.I.P 2 My Youth
There are several works this could apply to that have already been discussed (Strike Witches comes to mind). Can we make this official?
edited 22nd May '12 10:04:07 AM by tdgoodrich1
"Polite life will fill you full of cancer." - Iggy Pop "I've seen the future, brother, it is murder." -Leonard Cohen
I like the idea of an official no gushing comment at the top of problem pages.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
What would this comment say?
I like this:
%% When editing this page, please be especially mindful of our No Lewdness No Prudishness policy. When describing the tropes listed in this work, do not gush over fanservice elements. Doing so will lead to your edit being reverted and possible disciplinary action.
being very against cutting works I think that's a fair and reasonable solution for many of the border line works.
R.I.P 2 My Youth
That would work. It's much less blunt than what I had in mind.
edited 22nd May '12 10:14:51 AM by tdgoodrich1
"Polite life will fill you full of cancer." - Iggy Pop "I've seen the future, brother, it is murder." -Leonard Cohen
That looks good. Of course, as it will only display when you've opened the page for editing, the bluelink won't automatically show up.
edited 22nd May '12 10:18:12 AM by Arha
I'm aware of this. Wanted to go ahead and bluelink it here in case people were unaware of the page (by some odd reason), and to give them a reference for a more detailed policy statement.
Arha's placement is something I agree with. When I was first reading this, I thought people were proposing it as a page banner, which would cause all kinds of problems. XD
edited 22nd May '12 10:22:08 AM by LargoQuagmire
It could appear at the top of the page in some form like "Image Pickin' Discussion" is on the top of World-Wrecking Wave page.
Maybe just a phrase like "under content violation watch" that links to a page that spells out those rules.
edited 22nd May '12 10:25:12 AM by GraySloth
The fact that I had double-percent signs was meant to convey that it was going to be commented out at the top of the page. I apologize if the bluelink was going counter to that intention.
Commented out on the top of the page seems best to me.
edited 22nd May '12 10:24:08 AM by DarkConfidant
Hi
+1 for the hidden "no gushing" tag, that's a great idea.
I don't think the bluelink is necessarily counter to having a hidden "no gushing" comment, but it might be a bit problematic. Either way, the banner is an excellent idea. The little issues can be worked out.
Well, certainly, something will work out.
Any particular issue with that proposed comment/tag? As in, does the wording and general tone of the message seem reasonable to everyone?
TV Tropes' Sonic Wiki Curator
I have no objections, mang.
Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.
likes the cheeses.
Looks good to me.
Visit my contributor page to assist with the "I Like The Cheeses" project!
☆♥☆
I'd also kind of like to know what's up with the devil votes on Morenatsu. I don't care about it, but it doesn't look cut-worthy, and it's annoying watching Enzeru be mostly ignored.
If I remember correctly one of the characters looks pedo-baitish or some thing.
A pocketful of saudade.
A (hypothetical) banner would be good as well, since it is visible to the reader. "Here be dragons; possibly. If you spot one, that's some naughty editor's misjudgement. We do not approve of dragons." Of course, that functions in a different way from a simple note to editors. So maybe a digression.
We can also put all pages that got away conditionally in an index so that they're easy to watch.
"These pages were reported for possible content rule violations, but were kept under the conditions that they remain clean. This move is usually done with works that have things worth troping in them, but also possess aspects that attract content rule-violating edits. For that purpose, they are watched here so that violations can be spotted quickly. Exercise more careful judgement when editing these pages, and report if you find instances where the rule was broken."
Or something.
edited 22nd May '12 12:00:50 PM by Catalogue
The words above are to be read as if they are narrated by Morgan Freeman.
(Thread Hop)RE HighSchool DXD:
I've watched the anime in its entirety and have read the 3rd and 4th novels (which weren't adapted) and am keeping up with Baka-Tsuki's current translation project, so I can answer any questions regarding it.
edited 22nd May '12 12:02:20 PM by TheFoxsCloak
Trolls probably think flagging works like sort of an anonymous tip while, in truth, the staff can see who did it.