Groundbreaking research on sexual desire

@ Matt

Because although it sounds stupid, it is my own personal philosophy to try to treat everyone as an individual. Otherwise, I risk finding reasons to hate everyone if I start grouping people and I'm not going into why, so I can stay on-topic.

You know, having a map of reality that's conveniently layered is pretty normal. For example you can support your country going to war with country X because you think it's right on an international level, and having a very cordial relationship with a citizen of country X on a personal level. Plus, "men on average think of sex like this, women think of sex like that, straight and gay people of the same sex usually "brain" it the same way but with focus on other parts, and this explains some common differences in taste and in media seeking, as well as a few frictions when it comes to seeking one another out and being relationships that involve sex that are satisfying". Also notice how while you (generic you) yourself don't know anyone like this (that you know of, and really, how many people do you know at that level of intimacy?), it might simply mean that you surround yourself with a particular subculture.

@ Pacific State

I am well aware of what subcultures I surround myself in: athletes, gym rats, martial artists, anime lovers, comics lovers and video game lovers. I can acknowledge my own biases; I just prefer to treat everyone as individuals because when I group people, sometimes my problems with others can make me dislike people as a whole. I do not want to go into my Dark and Troubled Past, as it may either sound like Wangst or go off-topic.

I bought the book and I found much of the researches and analysis to be very plausible. The researches aren't meant to be crowd pleasers, keep that in mind. And yes, although some portion of the conjectures sound rather 'assuming' and not very in depth, at least they have the internet traffic to back that up

In other words, traffic data + backed up conjectures + plausible reasons = a good look into sexual desire traffic as a whole

I mean, it's not like I can find another book at this point, unless Anonymous will bring out someone who has better publicity, research and editorial skills into the fray

Controversy is often an indication that at least one is not afraid to say something the public does not like. If a scientist says something non-controversial, it could still be right, but we have no way of knowing that scientists didn't just dilute their findings for fear of angering the general public.

That depends on which public you're talking about. Deliberately pissing off some people can actually be a good move to make other people pay more attention to you.