Follow TV Tropes

Following

Two articles about the same thing: Actor IS The Title Character

Go To

Sparvid Since: Dec, 2009
#1: Sep 10th 2011 at 10:14:40 PM

I recently added an example of the lead actor being referred to on the poster as being the main character. Today I was going to check something out on the page, but couldn't remember the article title, so I search for "actor is character" and found Actor IS the Title Character. But my contribution wasn't there, not even in the history. So looking at my own edit history, it turns out that my edit was on Big Star Is Main Character instead, which seems to be a separate page about the exact same thing.

LordGriffin Since: Sep, 2010
#2: Sep 11th 2011 at 6:36:35 AM

Agreed. Same trope. Suggest merge.

Auxdarastrix Since: May, 2010
#3: Sep 11th 2011 at 7:00:23 AM

This one is a no-brainer. I agree with the merge suggestion.

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#4: Sep 11th 2011 at 7:02:36 AM

Agree here as well. I slightly prefer the way Big Star Is Main Character explains it, but like Actor IS the Title Character as a name better.

edited 11th Sep '11 7:03:18 AM by Madrugada

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Raso Cure Candy Since: Jul, 2009
Cure Candy
#5: Sep 11th 2011 at 7:04:24 AM

[up] Agree with this.

Crowner to see which gets the redirect?

edited 11th Sep '11 7:04:36 AM by Raso

Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#6: Sep 11th 2011 at 8:04:31 AM

Crowner up.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
LouieW Loser from Babycowland Since: Aug, 2009
Loser
#7: Oct 5th 2011 at 5:02:30 PM

Since there was pretty significant support for merging the two pages under Actor IS the Title Character, I went ahead and did that, basing the description of the merged trope on the one from Big Star Is Main Character, moving the examples, and fixing the wicks.

I may have made a mistake though, so if I did, feel free to point it out to me and/or correct it.

"irhgT nm0w tehre might b ea lotof th1nmgs i dont udarstannd, ubt oim ujst goinjg to keepfollowing this pazth i belieove iN !!!!!1 d
Add Post

11th Sep '11 8:00:12 AM

Crown Description:

The two pages are virtually duplicates.

Total posts: 7
Top