Hope it's in the vein of classic Nineties stuff like House Of Mouse Sylvester And Tweety Mysteries and Pinky And The Brain. That shit was so good it showed up on I Love The Nineties.
Closet DCLAU fan.Bugs's design bugs me, but we've been through that argument so I'm going to drop it for now. What really scares me is this:
"The Tasmanian Devil, Speedy Gonzales, Marvin the Martian and other classic characters sing original songs in two-minute music videos called Merrie Melodies and the Road Runner and Coyote are featured in 2-1/2 minute CG shorts"
The Tasmanian Devil. Singing. Do I need to say any more?
As for the CGI—for me, all that means is that it's only a matter of time before Bugs and the gang get the Alvin and the Chipmunks/Underdog/Smurfs/Yogi Bear treatment. And to be frank that scares the shit out of me. (Also, if people are complaining that the Road Runner shorts have become parodies of themselves, then Chuck Jones is up in Heaven jumping for joy, because the damn things were supposed to be parodies to begin with.)
Maybe you'd be less disappointed if you stopped expecting things to be Carmen Sandiego movies.Sounds hilarious.
Seriously though, it looks like they're falling back on a Disney approach here. Sort of like Mickey Mouse Works, with the shorter segments that are cut to the chase action and/or parodic music numbers, and longer cartoons with the characters in various plots,and the "love interest" and "in the suburbs" bits are really reminiscent of Disney cartoons.
Not a problem, since I'm confident they can put their own spin on it, but still, if we get "Daffy's Dynamite" I'm going to be annoyed.
edited 15th Jun '10 10:11:23 AM by KnownUnknown
"The difference between reality and fiction is that fiction has to make sense." - Tom Clancy, paraphrasing Mark Twain.Maybe they can fit some Duck Dodgers shorts in there, too.
mudshark: I don't expect Nate to make sense, really.We has commercial!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJP6RNoiZhQ&playnext_from=TL&videos=pJxpMVZe3c8&feature=recentu
Easy street has no parking signs.Saw the commercial. Is that still Billy West doing Daffy's voice?
edited 18th Jul '10 5:44:54 PM by KnownUnknown
"The difference between reality and fiction is that fiction has to make sense." - Tom Clancy, paraphrasing Mark Twain.Okay, Road Runner and Will E Coyote should not be CG. The actual slapstick was good, but seeing it in CG was fucked up.
Fight smart, not fair.These CG shots look much better.
edited 18th Jul '10 6:25:18 PM by newtonthenewt
She's playing with fire! He's not ready for Nibbly Pig!They do, but I still liked the old way where it was a flat color.
Fight smart, not fair.Is it just me, or have they just decided not to speed up Daffy's voice at all. I noticed that they've been doing it less and less, but it sounds like they've finally opted to stop doing it altogether.
Sounds a bit odd, but I suppose that's mostly because I'm not used to it.
"The difference between reality and fiction is that fiction has to make sense." - Tom Clancy, paraphrasing Mark Twain.That article is Fail. It said "Big Screen" that implies Film numnards.
Closet DCLAU fan.It actually looks pretty good.
Easy street has no parking signs.I just like how they say that they're putting Daffy in the suburbs so he can cause more damage with his insanity. That shows that they do at least know the (well, at least one of them) characterization.
I put up a new page for the show, guys. Feel free to do what you want with it.
"Oh, and if one of the promos is any indication, they're also going to air the old Looney Tunes shorts alongside this brand new show. "
When was this?
edited 28th Jul '10 6:16:07 PM by CTM
Easy street has no parking signs.Question. Why spend money making new shorts when you can just reair the old shorts? They'd be more entertaining, and most of our current crop of kids hasn't seen most of them.
mudshark: I don't expect Nate to make sense, really.Making new stuff is fun.
Easy street has no parking signs.The 2d segments look good (Bugs looks barely changed at all) but the CG Road Runner shorts...
NO.
^^^^ Making new versions of old things is fun, but it works best when you've got completely new ideas to put alongside it. Innovation all around.
"The difference between reality and fiction is that fiction has to make sense." - Tom Clancy, paraphrasing Mark Twain.My first reaction to seeing the new character designs was "Oh Wow, they look like little kids! Are they going to be making this a Looney Tunes prequel of sorts? Sort of like a Prequel to Tiny Toons!". But no, they aren't. It's a sitcom of sorts.
So anyway here's my WMG for the series:
I think the person in question, Jessica Borutski, is pure Your Mileage May Vary. I personally don't care for her art style (particularly after looking at her Oswald◊, shudders) but I guess there are some who actually enjoy seeing this new design, for some reason.
edited 6th Sep '10 12:55:37 PM by Mattonymy
You are displaying abnormally high compulsions to over-analyze works of fiction and media. Diagnosis: TV Tropes Addiction.Oh this is going to be bad...
Oh, and here's the entire cast lineup: ◊ They're bringing back Lola. Flat "What". Well, there goes any and all existing hope I had for the series.
edited 6th Sep '10 1:10:37 PM by Mattonymy
You are displaying abnormally high compulsions to over-analyze works of fiction and media. Diagnosis: TV Tropes Addiction.^ You could at least wait for it to air you know.
So, you're rejoicing?
It still looks interesting, though, I like the designs too.