Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / WhereTheWildThingsAre

Go To

OR

Added: 188

Changed: 36

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Also, that one scene where Douglas is petting a cat.
** "Hey Richard"

to:

** Also, that There's also one scene where Douglas is petting a cat.
** [[PlayedForLaughs "Hey Richard"Richard"]]


Added DiffLines:

* CreepyCute: The Wild Things fall into this. Their eyes are big and eerie, they loom as if about to attack, and they have sharp claws and fangs. But they're still overtly lovable looking.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The music from both versions of the Weston Woods adaptation have their charm. The experimental music done by Gene Deitch in the original may put some off, but many are more fond of Peter "P.D.Q. Bach" Schickele's score, which is evocative of Mozart, who was Sendak's favorite composer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Narm}}: Hearing [[Series/TheSopranos James Gandolfini]] as the voice of Carol.

to:

* {{Narm}}: Hearing [[Series/TheSopranos James Gandolfini]] as the voice of Tony Soprano]] voicing Carol.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* {{Narm}}: Hearing [[Series/TheSopranos James Gandolfini]] as the voice of Carol.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Then again, Maurice Sendak has gone on record to state that the film is absolutely fine for kids "and anyone who doesn't like can go right to hell." So... there's that. Although, to be fair, the original ''was'' meant as a children's story, and Sendak has gotten more than his fair share of this trope, to the point that some teachers wanted to '''ban''' them.

to:

** Then again, Maurice Sendak has gone on record to state that the film is absolutely fine for kids "and anyone who doesn't like can go right to hell." [[ApprovalOfGod So... there's that.that]]. Although, to be fair, the original ''was'' meant as a children's story, and Sendak has gotten more than his fair share of this trope, to the point that some teachers wanted to '''ban''' them.

Added: 245

Removed: 245

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ValuesDissonance: Some have interpreted the film as being pro-imperialist, seeing as the white boy Max goes to a land of monsters and immediately becomes their king. Since the book was released in 1963, it's hard to fault it for this, though.



* ValuesDissonance: Some have interpreted the film as being pro-imperialist, seeing as the white boy Max goes to a land of monsters and immediately becomes their king. Since the book was released in 1963, it's hard to fault it for this, though.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ValuesDissonance: Some have interpreted the film as being pro-imperialist, seeing as the white boy Max goes to a land of monsters and immediately becomes their king. Since the book was released in 1963, it's hard to fault it for this, though.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* NightmareFuel: Carol [[spoiler: ripping off Douglas's arm.]]

to:

* NightmareFuel: Carol [[spoiler: ripping off Douglas's arm.arm who starts ''bleeding sand''.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Like Max, Carol hasn't learned to live with change and genuinely wants good things but his tantrums aren't helping matters and, from what's implied, said tantrums are the reason as to why [=KW=] spends less time around the other wild things. To top this off, at the end, [[spoiler: he doesn't even get to make amends]]

to:

** Like Max, Carol hasn't learned to live with change and genuinely wants good things but his tantrums aren't helping matters and, from what's implied, said tantrums (and him being kind of a bully) are the reason as to why [=KW=] spends less time around the other wild things. To top this off, at the end, [[spoiler: he doesn't even get to make amends]]



** Potentially lessened by the fact that none of the characters (including Douglas himself) react in a way that implies that Douglas is not in pain. If anything he reacts more with annoyance. However, this could go the other way, and the disproportionate reaction might make it seem even *more* unsettling.

to:

** Potentially lessened by the fact that none of the characters (including Douglas himself) react in a way that implies that Douglas is not in pain. If anything pain and, if anything, he reacts more with annoyance. However, this could go the other way, and the disproportionate reaction might make it seem even *more* unsettling.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Max, from what we can see, mostly lashes out because he hasn't learned to cope with his parents' divorce, however, while understandable, it doesn't excuse some of the things he does that makes life harder for everyone else
** Like Max, Carol hasn't learned to live with change and genuinely wants good things but his tantrums aren't helping matters and, from what's implied, said tantrums are the reason as to why [=KW=] spends less time around the other wild things. To top this off, at the end, [[spoiler: he doesn't even get to make amends]]

to:

** Max, **Max, from what we can see, mostly lashes out because he hasn't learned to cope with his parents' divorce, however, while understandable, it doesn't excuse some of the things he does that makes life harder for everyone else
** Like **Like Max, Carol hasn't learned to live with change and genuinely wants good things but his tantrums aren't helping matters and, from what's implied, said tantrums are the reason as to why [=KW=] spends less time around the other wild things. To top this off, at the end, [[spoiler: he doesn't even get to make amends]]



* TheWoobie: Alexander. Arguably, the other wild things qualify as this, too, but he's the most obvious, as, throughout his time on the island, he's put down and ignored, thus he acts up to get attention (which, adding insult to injury, doesn't work) and, on top of this, Max doesn't even remember his name. It's not until he gets hurt that someone ''finally'' reaches out to him.

to:

* TheWoobie: Alexander. Arguably, the other wild things qualify as this, too, but he's the most obvious, as, throughout throughout his time on the island, he's put down and ignored, thus he acts up to get attention (which, adding insult to injury, doesn't work) and, on top of this, Max doesn't even remember his name. It's not until he gets hurt that someone ''finally'' reaches out to him.

Added: 544

Changed: 444

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


**Max, from what we can see, mostly lashes out because he hasn't learned to cope with his parents' divorce, however, while understandable, it doesn't excuse some of the things he does that makes life harder for everyone else
**Like Max, Carol hasn't learned to live with change and genuinely wants good things but his tantrums aren't helping matters and, from what's implied, said tantrums are the reason as to why [=KW=] spends less time around the other wild things. To top this off, at the end, [[spoiler: he doesn't even get to make amends]]



** Potentially lessened by the fact that none of the characters (including Douglas himself) react in a way that implies that Douglas is in pain. If anything he reacts more with annoyance. However, this could go the other way, and the disproportionate reaction might make it seem even *more* unsettling.

to:

** Potentially lessened by the fact that none of the characters (including Douglas himself) react in a way that implies that Douglas is not in pain. If anything he reacts more with annoyance. However, this could go the other way, and the disproportionate reaction might make it seem even *more* unsettling.



* TheWoobie: Alexander. [[spoiler:Arguably everyone except Claire, her friends, and Max's mom's boyfriend, who aren't developed enough to qualify, and the teacher, who is [[SadistTeacher kind of scary.]]]]

to:

* TheWoobie: Alexander. [[spoiler:Arguably everyone except Claire, her friends, Arguably, the other wild things qualify as this, too, but he's the most obvious, as, throughout his time on the island, he's put down and Max's mom's boyfriend, who aren't developed enough ignored, thus he acts up to qualify, and the teacher, who is [[SadistTeacher kind get attention (which, adding insult to injury, doesn't work) and, on top of scary.]]]]
this, Max doesn't even remember his name. It's not until he gets hurt that someone ''finally'' reaches out to him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AwesomeMusic: The use of [[Music/ArcadeFire Arcade Fire’s]] “Wake Up” in the movie trailer prepares the audience for the surprising amount of TearJerker moments throughout the film.

to:

* AwesomeMusic: SugarWiki/AwesomeMusic: The use of [[Music/ArcadeFire Arcade Fire’s]] “Wake Up” in the movie trailer prepares the audience for the surprising amount of TearJerker moments throughout the film.



* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: The Wild Thing suits. The combination of CGI and animatronics is ''seamless.''

to:

* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: The Wild Thing suits. The combination of CGI and animatronics is ''seamless.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AwesomeMusic: The use of [[Music/ArcadeFire Arcade Fire’s]] “Wake Up” in the movie trailer prepares the audience for the surprising amount of TearJerker moments throughout the film.


Added DiffLines:

* BrokenBase: Audiences are very divided over the film adaptation’s DarkerAndEdgier tone, with some saying it works and others saying it was unnecessary.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Either the monsters are [[ImaginaryFriend Imaginary Friends]] of Max, or representations of his emotions and the people he lives with. Max himself can also be seen as a child with a personality disorder.

to:

* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: Either the monsters are [[ImaginaryFriend Imaginary Friends]] of Max, or representations of his emotions and the people he lives with. Max himself can also be seen as a child with a personality disorder.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Either the monsters are {{imaginary friend|s}} of Max, or representations of his emotions and the people he lives with. Max himself can also be seen as a child with a personality disorder.

to:

* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Either the monsters are {{imaginary friend|s}} [[ImaginaryFriend Imaginary Friends]] of Max, or representations of his emotions and the people he lives with. Max himself can also be seen as a child with a personality disorder.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Alexander warning Max not to tell Carol that he isn't a king.

Changed: 6

Removed: 459

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** "Hey Richard."
* HilariousInHindsight: The film and book is all about how to deal with emotions, and, as stated above, Max could be interpreted as having a personality disorder. Ironically enough, the actor who plays Max is set to portray John Wayne Cleaver in IAmNotASerialKiller. Cleaver has an absent father, and a strained relationship with his mother, similar to Max. WordOfGod states that he was cast as Cleaver because of his performance in Where the wild things are.

to:

** "Hey Richard."
* HilariousInHindsight: The film and book is all about how to deal with emotions, and, as stated above, Max could be interpreted as having a personality disorder. Ironically enough, the actor who plays Max is set to portray John Wayne Cleaver in IAmNotASerialKiller. Cleaver has an absent father, and a strained relationship with his mother, similar to Max. WordOfGod states that he was cast as Cleaver because of his performance in Where the wild things are.
Richard"



** Then again, Maurice Sendak has gone on record to state that the film is absolutely fine for kids "and anyone who doesn't like that can go right to hell." So... there's that. Although, to be fair, the original ''was'' meant as a children's story, and Sendak has gotten more than his fair share of this trope, to the point that some teachers wanted to '''ban''' them.

to:

** Then again, Maurice Sendak has gone on record to state that the film is absolutely fine for kids "and anyone who doesn't like that can go right to hell." So... there's that. Although, to be fair, the original ''was'' meant as a children's story, and Sendak has gotten more than his fair share of this trope, to the point that some teachers wanted to '''ban''' them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HilariousInHindsight: The film and book is all about how to deal with emotions, and, as stated above, Max could be interpreted as having a personality disorder. Ironically enough, the actor who plays Max is set to portray John Wayne Cleaver in IAmNotASerialKiller. Cleaver has an absent father, and a strained relationship with his mother, similar to Max. WordOfGod states that he was cast as Cleaver because of his performance in Where the wild things are.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Also, that one scene where one of the monsters is petting a cat.

to:

** Also, that one scene where one of the monsters Douglas is petting a cat.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also Carol [[spoiler: trying to eat Max in a fit of rage.]]
Willbyr MOD

Added: 302

Changed: 76

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
replacing Zero Context Example with example from work page


* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Either the monsters are [[ImaginaryFriend imaginary friends]] of Max, or representations of his emotions and the people he lives with. Max himself can also be seen as a child with a personality disorder.

to:

* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: Either the monsters are [[ImaginaryFriend imaginary friends]] {{imaginary friend|s}} of Max, or representations of his emotions and the people he lives with. Max himself can also be seen as a child with a personality disorder.



* NightmareFuel: Where to begin?

to:

* NightmareFuel: Where to begin?Carol [[spoiler: ripping off Douglas's arm.]]
** Potentially lessened by the fact that none of the characters (including Douglas himself) react in a way that implies that Douglas is in pain. If anything he reacts more with annoyance. However, this could go the other way, and the disproportionate reaction might make it seem even *more* unsettling.


Added DiffLines:

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* NightmareFuel: Where to begin?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Because we never learn how the events of the movie affect Max, the ''entire trip to visit the Wild Things'' could be considered a BLAM. You could excise the sequence and not have any effect on the "real world" plot aside from making the movie a lot shorter.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Because we never learn how the events of the movie effect Max, the ''entire trip to visit the Wild Things'' could be considered a BLAM. You could excise the sequence and not have any effect on the "real world" plot aside from making the movie a lot shorter.

to:

** Because we never learn how the events of the movie effect affect Max, the ''entire trip to visit the Wild Things'' could be considered a BLAM. You could excise the sequence and not have any effect on the "real world" plot aside from making the movie a lot shorter.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Then again, Maurice Sendak has gone on record to state that the film is absolutely fine for kids "and anyone who doesn't like that can go right to hell." So... there's that. Although, to be fair, the original ''was'' meant as a children's story, and Sendak has gotten his fair share of this trope from his books, to the point that some teachers wanted to '''ban''' his books.

to:

** Then again, Maurice Sendak has gone on record to state that the film is absolutely fine for kids "and anyone who doesn't like that can go right to hell." So... there's that. Although, to be fair, the original ''was'' meant as a children's story, and Sendak has gotten more than his fair share of this trope from his books, trope, to the point that some teachers wanted to '''ban''' his books.them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Then again, Maurice Sendak has gone on record to state that the film is absolutely fine for kids "and anyone who doesn't like that can go right to hell." So... there's that.

to:

** Then again, Maurice Sendak has gone on record to state that the film is absolutely fine for kids "and anyone who doesn't like that can go right to hell." So... there's that. Although, to be fair, the original ''was'' meant as a children's story, and Sendak has gotten his fair share of this trope from his books, to the point that some teachers wanted to '''ban''' his books.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not A Subversion, even if the opinion is a fact


* ItsShortSoItSucks: Possibly the biggest subversion of this trope in any medium.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: The Wild Thing suits. The combination of CGI and animatronics is ''seamless.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* WhatDoYouMeanItsForKids: [[http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/news/2009-10-19-wild-things-controversy_N.htm Some people asked this very question]] about the 2009 movie.
** Granted, Spike Jonze himself stated in an interview that it wasn't meant to be a kid's film, but a "film about childhood".
** Then again, Maurice Sendak has gone on record to state that the film is absolutely fine for kids "and anyone who doesn't like that can go right to hell." So... there's that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* JerkassWoobie: Carol.

to:

* JerkassWoobie: Max and Carol.

Top