Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* SugarWiki/AwesomeMoments: Rita Starpattern ran into harm's way, within the line-of-sight of the shooter, and laid down next to the severely injured Claire Wilson on scorching hot pavement for an hour to keep Wilson company and conscious until other bystanders were able to carry both of them to safety. Wilson might not have survived if it weren't for Starpattern's bravery. Also counts as a SugarWiki/{{Heartwarming Moment|s}}.
to:
* SugarWiki/AwesomeMoments: Rita Starpattern ran into harm's way, within the line-of-sight of the shooter, and laid down next to the severely injured Claire Wilson on scorching hot pavement for an hour to keep Wilson company and conscious until other bystanders were able to carry both of them to safety. Wilson might not have survived if it weren't for Starpattern's bravery. Also counts as a SugarWiki/{{Heartwarming Moment|s}}.Moment|s}}, especially since the two were complete strangers to one another back then.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* HePannedItNowHeSucks: ''San Diego Reader''[='=]s Scott Marks gave ''Tower'' [[https://www.sandiegoreader.com/movies/tower-2016/ a 0/5 star "bomb" rating]] primarily because he hated the film's use of {{rotoscop|ing}}ed animation when "there seems to be no shortage of [documented] footage surrounding Whitman’s killing spree", believing that [[AnimationAgeGhetto the "absurdity" of the animation]] {{Disneyfi|cation}}ed the horror of the tragedy. His review caused the film to lose its 100% rating on Website/RottenTomatoes after two years. While rotoscoping ''is'' disliked by animation buffs, most would actually agree that the use of the technique is justified in this film because what archive footage is available for that tragic day doesn't ''really'' tell the whole story, and that director-producer Keith Maitland did realize that the University of Texas at Austin would not permit him to film any live-action reenactments on the campus. Regardless, Marks received a number of responses invoking this trope in the Website/{{Facebook}} comments attached to his review. His review remains the only negative professional review registered on RT as of 2023.
to:
* SugarWiki/AwesomeMoments: Rita Starpattern ran into harm's way, within the line-of-sight of the shooter, and laid down next to the severely injured Claire Wilson on scorching hot pavement for an hour to keep Wilson company and conscious until other bystanders were able to carry both of them to safety. Wilson might not have survived if it weren't for Starpattern's bravery. Also counts as a SugarWiki/{{Heartwarming Moment|s}}.
* HePannedItNowHeSucks: ''San Diego Reader''[='=]s Scott Marks gave ''Tower'' [[https://www.sandiegoreader.com/movies/tower-2016/ a 0/5 star "bomb" rating]] primarily because he hated the film's use of {{rotoscop|ing}}ed animation when "there seems to be no shortage of [documented] footage surrounding Whitman’s killing spree", believing that [[AnimationAgeGhetto the "absurdity" of the animation]] {{Disneyfi|cation}}ed the horror of the tragedy. His review caused the film to lose its 100% rating on Website/RottenTomatoes after two years. While rotoscoping ''is'' disliked by animation buffs, most wouldactually agree that the use of the technique is justified in this film because what archive footage is available for that tragic day doesn't ''really'' tell the whole story, and that director-producer Keith Maitland did realize that the University of Texas at Austin would not permit him to film any live-action reenactments on the campus. Regardless, Marks received a number of several responses invoking this trope in the Website/{{Facebook}} comments attached to his review. His review remains the only negative professional review registered on RT as of 2023.
* HePannedItNowHeSucks: ''San Diego Reader''[='=]s Scott Marks gave ''Tower'' [[https://www.sandiegoreader.com/movies/tower-2016/ a 0/5 star "bomb" rating]] primarily because he hated the film's use of {{rotoscop|ing}}ed animation when "there seems to be no shortage of [documented] footage surrounding Whitman’s killing spree", believing that [[AnimationAgeGhetto the "absurdity" of the animation]] {{Disneyfi|cation}}ed the horror of the tragedy. His review caused the film to lose its 100% rating on Website/RottenTomatoes after two years. While rotoscoping ''is'' disliked by animation buffs, most would
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* HePannedItNowHeSucks: ''San Diego Reader''[='=]s Scott Marks gave ''Tower'' [[https://www.sandiegoreader.com/movies/tower-2016/ a 0/5 star "bomb" rating]] primarily because he hated the film's use of {{rotoscop|ing}}ed animation when "there seems to be no shortage of [documented] footage surrounding Whitman’s killing spree", believing that [[AnimationAgeGhetto the "absurdity" of the animation]] {{Disneyfi|cation}}ed the horror of the tragedy. His review caused the film to lose its 100% rating on Website/RottenTomatoes after two years. While rotoscoping ''is'' disliked by animation buffs, most would actually agree that the use of the technique is justified in this film because what archive footage that is available for that tragic day doesn't ''really'' tell the whole story, and that director-producer Keith Maitland did realize that the University of Texas at Austin would not permit him to film any live-action reenactments on the campus. Regardless, Marks received a number of responses invoking this trope in the Website/{{Facebook}} comments attached to his review.
to:
* HePannedItNowHeSucks: ''San Diego Reader''[='=]s Scott Marks gave ''Tower'' [[https://www.sandiegoreader.com/movies/tower-2016/ a 0/5 star "bomb" rating]] primarily because he hated the film's use of {{rotoscop|ing}}ed animation when "there seems to be no shortage of [documented] footage surrounding Whitman’s killing spree", believing that [[AnimationAgeGhetto the "absurdity" of the animation]] {{Disneyfi|cation}}ed the horror of the tragedy. His review caused the film to lose its 100% rating on Website/RottenTomatoes after two years. While rotoscoping ''is'' disliked by animation buffs, most would actually agree that the use of the technique is justified in this film because what archive footage that is available for that tragic day doesn't ''really'' tell the whole story, and that director-producer Keith Maitland did realize that the University of Texas at Austin would not permit him to film any live-action reenactments on the campus. Regardless, Marks received a number of responses invoking this trope in the Website/{{Facebook}} comments attached to his review. His review remains the only negative professional review registered on RT as of 2023.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Minor edit.
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* HePannedItNowHeSucks: ''San Diego Reader''[='=]s Scott Marks gave ''Tower'' [[https://www.sandiegoreader.com/movies/tower-2016/ a 0/5 star "bomb" rating]] primarily because he hated the film's use of {{rotoscop|ing}}ed animation when "there seems to be no shortage of [documented] footage surrounding Whitman’s killing spree", believing that [[AnimationAgeGhetto the "absurdity" of the animation]] {{Disneyfi|cation}}ed the horror of the tragedy. His review caused the film to lose its 100% rating on Website/RottenTomatoes after two years. While rotoscoping ''is'' disliked by animation buffs, most would actually agree that the use of the technique is justified in this film because what archive footage that is available for that tragic day doesn't ''really'' tell the whole story, and that director-producer Keith Maitland did realize that the University of Texas at Austin would not permit him to film any live-action reenactments on the campus. Regardless, Marks received a number of responses invoking this trope the Website/{{Facebook}} comments attached to his review.
to:
* HePannedItNowHeSucks: ''San Diego Reader''[='=]s Scott Marks gave ''Tower'' [[https://www.sandiegoreader.com/movies/tower-2016/ a 0/5 star "bomb" rating]] primarily because he hated the film's use of {{rotoscop|ing}}ed animation when "there seems to be no shortage of [documented] footage surrounding Whitman’s killing spree", believing that [[AnimationAgeGhetto the "absurdity" of the animation]] {{Disneyfi|cation}}ed the horror of the tragedy. His review caused the film to lose its 100% rating on Website/RottenTomatoes after two years. While rotoscoping ''is'' disliked by animation buffs, most would actually agree that the use of the technique is justified in this film because what archive footage that is available for that tragic day doesn't ''really'' tell the whole story, and that director-producer Keith Maitland did realize that the University of Texas at Austin would not permit him to film any live-action reenactments on the campus. Regardless, Marks received a number of responses invoking this trope in the Website/{{Facebook}} comments attached to his review.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Eight Point Eight is actually for games, so...
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* EightPointEight: ''San Diego Reader''[='=]s Scott Marks gave ''Tower'' [[https://www.sandiegoreader.com/movies/tower-2016/ a 0/5 star "bomb" rating]] primarily because he hated the film's use of {{rotoscop|ing}}ed animation when "there seems to be no shortage of [documented] footage surrounding Whitman’s killing spree", believing that [[AnimationAgeGhetto the "absurdity" of the animation]] {{Disneyfi|cation}}ed the horror of the tragedy. His review caused the film to lose its 100% rating on Website/RottenTomatoes after two years. While rotoscoping ''is'' disliked by animation buffs, most would actually agree that the use of the technique is justified in this film because what archive footage that is available for that tragic day doesn't ''really'' tell the whole story, and that director-producer Keith Maitland did realize that the University of Texas at Austin would not permit him to film any live-action reenactments on the campus. Regardless, Marks received a number of HePannedItNowHeSucks responses in the Website/{{Facebook}} comments attached to his review.
to:
* EightPointEight: HePannedItNowHeSucks: ''San Diego Reader''[='=]s Scott Marks gave ''Tower'' [[https://www.sandiegoreader.com/movies/tower-2016/ a 0/5 star "bomb" rating]] primarily because he hated the film's use of {{rotoscop|ing}}ed animation when "there seems to be no shortage of [documented] footage surrounding Whitman’s killing spree", believing that [[AnimationAgeGhetto the "absurdity" of the animation]] {{Disneyfi|cation}}ed the horror of the tragedy. His review caused the film to lose its 100% rating on Website/RottenTomatoes after two years. While rotoscoping ''is'' disliked by animation buffs, most would actually agree that the use of the technique is justified in this film because what archive footage that is available for that tragic day doesn't ''really'' tell the whole story, and that director-producer Keith Maitland did realize that the University of Texas at Austin would not permit him to film any live-action reenactments on the campus. Regardless, Marks received a number of HePannedItNowHeSucks responses in invoking this trope the Website/{{Facebook}} comments attached to his review.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Minor edit.
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* EightPointEight: ''San Diego Reader''[='=]s Scott Marks gave ''Tower'' [[https://www.sandiegoreader.com/movies/tower-2016/ a 0/5 star "bomb" rating]] primarily because he hated the film's use of {{rotoscop|ing}}ed animation when "there seems to be no shortage of [documented] footage surrounding Whitman’s killing spree", believing that [[AnimationAgeGhetto the "absurdity" of the animation]] {{Disneyfi|cation}}ed the horror of the tragedy. His review caused the film to lose its 100% rating on Website/RottenTomatoes after two years. While rotoscoping ''is'' disliked by animation buffs, most would actually agree that the use of the technique is justified in this film because what archive footage that was available for that tragic day doesn't ''really'' tell the whole story, and that director-producer Keith Maitland did realize that the University of Texas at Austin would not permit him to film any live-action reenactments on the campus. Regardless, Marks received a number of HePannedItNowHeSucks responses in the Website/{{Facebook}} comments attached to his review.
to:
* EightPointEight: ''San Diego Reader''[='=]s Scott Marks gave ''Tower'' [[https://www.sandiegoreader.com/movies/tower-2016/ a 0/5 star "bomb" rating]] primarily because he hated the film's use of {{rotoscop|ing}}ed animation when "there seems to be no shortage of [documented] footage surrounding Whitman’s killing spree", believing that [[AnimationAgeGhetto the "absurdity" of the animation]] {{Disneyfi|cation}}ed the horror of the tragedy. His review caused the film to lose its 100% rating on Website/RottenTomatoes after two years. While rotoscoping ''is'' disliked by animation buffs, most would actually agree that the use of the technique is justified in this film because what archive footage that was is available for that tragic day doesn't ''really'' tell the whole story, and that director-producer Keith Maitland did realize that the University of Texas at Austin would not permit him to film any live-action reenactments on the campus. Regardless, Marks received a number of HePannedItNowHeSucks responses in the Website/{{Facebook}} comments attached to his review.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Copyedits.
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* EightPointEight: ''San Diego Reader''[='=]s Scott Marks gave ''Tower'' [[https://www.sandiegoreader.com/movies/tower-2016/ a 0/5 star "bomb" rating]] primarily because he hated the film's use of {{rotoscop|ing}}ed animation when "there seems to be no shortage of [documented] footage surrounding Whitman’s killing spree", believing that [[AnimationAgeGhetto the "absurdity" of the animation]] {{Disneyfi|cation}}ed the horror of the tragedy. His review caused the film to lose its 100% rating on Website/RottenTomatoes after two years. While rotoscoping ''is'' disliked by animation buffs, most would actually agree that the use of the technique is justified in this film because what archive footage that was available for that tragic day doesn't ''really'' tell the whole story, and that director-producer Keith Maitland did realize that the University of Texas at Austin would not permit him from filming the reenactments on the campus. Regardless, he received a number of HePannedItNowHeSucks responses on the Website/{{Facebook}} comments attached the review.
to:
* EightPointEight: ''San Diego Reader''[='=]s Scott Marks gave ''Tower'' [[https://www.sandiegoreader.com/movies/tower-2016/ a 0/5 star "bomb" rating]] primarily because he hated the film's use of {{rotoscop|ing}}ed animation when "there seems to be no shortage of [documented] footage surrounding Whitman’s killing spree", believing that [[AnimationAgeGhetto the "absurdity" of the animation]] {{Disneyfi|cation}}ed the horror of the tragedy. His review caused the film to lose its 100% rating on Website/RottenTomatoes after two years. While rotoscoping ''is'' disliked by animation buffs, most would actually agree that the use of the technique is justified in this film because what archive footage that was available for that tragic day doesn't ''really'' tell the whole story, and that director-producer Keith Maitland did realize that the University of Texas at Austin would not permit him from filming the to film any live-action reenactments on the campus. Regardless, he Marks received a number of HePannedItNowHeSucks responses on in the Website/{{Facebook}} comments attached the to his review.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Minor edit.
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* EightPointEight: ''San Diego Reader''[='=]s Scott Marks gave ''Tower'' https://www.sandiegoreader.com/movies/tower-2016/ a 0/5 star "bomb" rating]] primarily because he hated the film's use of {{rotoscop|ing}}ed animation when "there seems to be no shortage of [documented] footage surrounding Whitman’s killing spree", believing that [[AnimationAgeGhetto the "absurdity" of the animation]] {{Disneyfi|cation}}ed the horror of the tragedy. His review caused the film to lose its 100% rating on Website/RottenTomatoes after two years. While rotoscoping ''is'' disliked by animation buffs, most would actually agree that the use of the technique is justified in this film because what archive footage that was available for that tragic day doesn't ''really'' tell the whole story, and that director-producer Keith Maitland did realize that the University of Texas at Austin would not permit him from filming the reenactments on the campus. Regardless, he received a number of HePannedItNowHeSucks responses on the Website/{{Facebook}} comments attached the review.
to:
* EightPointEight: ''San Diego Reader''[='=]s Scott Marks gave ''Tower'' https://www.[[https://www.sandiegoreader.com/movies/tower-2016/ a 0/5 star "bomb" rating]] primarily because he hated the film's use of {{rotoscop|ing}}ed animation when "there seems to be no shortage of [documented] footage surrounding Whitman’s killing spree", believing that [[AnimationAgeGhetto the "absurdity" of the animation]] {{Disneyfi|cation}}ed the horror of the tragedy. His review caused the film to lose its 100% rating on Website/RottenTomatoes after two years. While rotoscoping ''is'' disliked by animation buffs, most would actually agree that the use of the technique is justified in this film because what archive footage that was available for that tragic day doesn't ''really'' tell the whole story, and that director-producer Keith Maitland did realize that the University of Texas at Austin would not permit him from filming the reenactments on the campus. Regardless, he received a number of HePannedItNowHeSucks responses on the Website/{{Facebook}} comments attached the review.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Created a YMMV page.
Added DiffLines:
* EightPointEight: ''San Diego Reader''[='=]s Scott Marks gave ''Tower'' https://www.sandiegoreader.com/movies/tower-2016/ a 0/5 star "bomb" rating]] primarily because he hated the film's use of {{rotoscop|ing}}ed animation when "there seems to be no shortage of [documented] footage surrounding Whitman’s killing spree", believing that [[AnimationAgeGhetto the "absurdity" of the animation]] {{Disneyfi|cation}}ed the horror of the tragedy. His review caused the film to lose its 100% rating on Website/RottenTomatoes after two years. While rotoscoping ''is'' disliked by animation buffs, most would actually agree that the use of the technique is justified in this film because what archive footage that was available for that tragic day doesn't ''really'' tell the whole story, and that director-producer Keith Maitland did realize that the University of Texas at Austin would not permit him from filming the reenactments on the campus. Regardless, he received a number of HePannedItNowHeSucks responses on the Website/{{Facebook}} comments attached the review.
