Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / Thor2014

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RescuedFromTheScrappyHeap: The new Thor, at least to some, became this when they revealed she was [[spoiler: Jane Foster, fighting cancer]], due largely because it added a lot of depth to the character and because it finally put one serious source of ArcFatigue to rest.

to:

* RescuedFromTheScrappyHeap: The new Thor, at least to some, became this when they revealed she was [[spoiler: Jane Foster, fighting cancer]], due largely because it added a lot of depth to the character and because it finally put one serious source of ArcFatigue to rest. It also helps that, in the ''Thors'' miniseries afterwards, Jason Aaron clearly sets up a ChekhovsGun that could very easily result in Odinson becoming worthy once again.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The ComicBook/AllNewAllDifferentMarvel relaunch's handling of Loki. Both in regards to Loki's design (where he's regained his second horn and gloves but still has a torn jacket, and has gained PermaStubble, that resembles pubes glued to his chin, when Loki's typically been clean shaven, and is now explicitly an adult when previously appeared to be in a young adult form) and his characterization (where its teased he might be returning to villainy, but its not clear if this is just Loki tricking the villains), has been devisive between those who are glad to have Loki back and enjoy the way he's being handled, and those (mostly fans of ''ComicBook/LokiAgentOfAsgard'') who are less thrilled with how he appears to have forgoed the character development from that run and the differing characterization between now and how God of Stories Loki appeared. Really didn't help that Loki:[=AoA=] was one of the titles stealth cancelled (read: ended without an official word about it to this day) before the relaunch and also one without a clear follow-up giving its fans the impression that Marvel ''expects'' them to pick up the new Thor title for their Loki fix.

to:

** The ComicBook/AllNewAllDifferentMarvel relaunch's handling of Loki. Both in regards to Loki's design (where he's regained his second horn and gloves but still has a torn jacket, and has gained PermaStubble, that resembles pubes glued to his chin, when Loki's typically been clean shaven, and is now explicitly an adult when previously appeared to be in a young adult form) and his characterization (where its teased he might be returning to villainy, but its not clear if this is just Loki tricking the villains), has been devisive between those who are glad to have Loki back and enjoy the way he's being handled, and those (mostly fans of ''ComicBook/LokiAgentOfAsgard'') who are less thrilled with how he appears to have forgoed the character development from that run and the differing characterization between now and how God of Stories Loki appeared. Really didn't help that Loki:[=AoA=] was one of the titles stealth cancelled (read: ended without an official word about it to this day) before the relaunch and also one without a clear follow-up giving its fans the impression that Marvel ''expects'' them to pick up the new Thor title for their Loki fix. This haws been somewhat mitigated by the implication that [[spoiler: Loki and Freyja are working together]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I cannot make sense of this sentence.


** Lady!Loki complaining about the "men" or making "we women" speeches comes off as either this or sarcasm depending what you think about the writer knowing what he is doing as main universe Lady!Loki was classical Loki in Sif's stolen body, and quite insistent on being just as much of a man as ever. If the writer knows this it must be sarcasm, if not... yeah... narm.

Added: 370

Removed: 370

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Lady!Loki complaining about the "men" or making "we women" speeches comes off as either this or sarcasm depending what you think about the writer knowing what he is doing as main universe Lady!Loki was classical Loki in Sif's stolen body, and quite insistent on being just as much of a man as ever. If the writer knows this it must be sarcasm, if not... yeah... narm.



** Lady!Loki complaining about the "men" or making "we women" speeches comes off as either this or sarcasm depending what you think about the writer knowing what he is doing as main universe Lady!Loki was classical Loki in Sif's stolen body, and quite insistent on being just as much of a man as ever. If the writer knows this it must be sarcasm, if not... yeah... narm.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Lady!Loki complaining about the "men" or making "we women" speeches comes off as either this or sarcasm depending what you think about the writer knowing what he is doing as main universe Lady!Loki was classical Loki in Sif's stolen body, and quite insistent on being just as much of a man as ever. If the writer knows this it must be sarcasm, if not... yeah... narm.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This part seems irrelevant, particularly the part about A-Force. If someone could maybe come up with a way to sum up reader reactions to the current run here, I think that should about cover it.


** The ComicBook/AllNewAllDifferentMarvel relaunch's handling of Loki. Both in regards to Loki's design (where he's regained his second horn and gloves but still has a torn jacket, and has gained PermaStubble, that resembles pubes glued to his chin, when Loki's typically been clean shaven, and is now explicitly an adult when previously appeared to be in a young adult form) and his characterization (where its teased he might be returning to villainy, but its not clear if this is just Loki tricking the villains), has been devisive between those who are glad to have Loki back and enjoy the way he's being handled, and those (mostly fans of ''ComicBook/LokiAgentOfAsgard'') who are less thrilled with how he appears to have forgoed the character development from that run and the differing characterization between now and how God of Stories Loki appeared. Really didn't help that Loki:[=AoA=] was one of the titles stealth cancelled (read: ended without an official word about it to this day) before the relaunch and also one without a clear follow-up giving its fans the impression that Marvel ''expects'' them to pick up the new Thor title for their Loki fix[[note]]As the book sold pretty solidly around 20 000 physical copies that's a sizeable reader base, and many of them gave Marvel the benefit of the doubt but see for example the YMMV on Comicbook/AForce how they got burned[[/note]].

to:

** The ComicBook/AllNewAllDifferentMarvel relaunch's handling of Loki. Both in regards to Loki's design (where he's regained his second horn and gloves but still has a torn jacket, and has gained PermaStubble, that resembles pubes glued to his chin, when Loki's typically been clean shaven, and is now explicitly an adult when previously appeared to be in a young adult form) and his characterization (where its teased he might be returning to villainy, but its not clear if this is just Loki tricking the villains), has been devisive between those who are glad to have Loki back and enjoy the way he's being handled, and those (mostly fans of ''ComicBook/LokiAgentOfAsgard'') who are less thrilled with how he appears to have forgoed the character development from that run and the differing characterization between now and how God of Stories Loki appeared. Really didn't help that Loki:[=AoA=] was one of the titles stealth cancelled (read: ended without an official word about it to this day) before the relaunch and also one without a clear follow-up giving its fans the impression that Marvel ''expects'' them to pick up the new Thor title for their Loki fix[[note]]As the book sold pretty solidly around 20 000 physical copies that's a sizeable reader base, and many of them gave Marvel the benefit of the doubt but see for example the YMMV on Comicbook/AForce how they got burned[[/note]].fix.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**And that Thor himself seems to indicate that the name comes with the power. If you possess the power of Thor you more-or-less receive the name of Thor as well. Package deal.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The ComicBook/AllNewAllDifferentMarvel relaunch's handling of Loki. Both in regards to Loki's design (where he's regained his second horn and gloves but still has a torn jacket, and has gained PermaStubble when Loki's typically been clean shaven, and is now explicitly an adult when previously appeared to be in a young adult form) and his characterization (where its teased he might be returning to villainy, but its not clear if this is just Loki tricking the villains), has been devisive between those who are glad to have Loki back and enjoy the way he's being handled, and those (mostly fans of ''ComicBook/LokiAgentOfAsgard'') who are less thrilled with how he appears to have forgoed the character development from that run and the differing characterization between now and how God of Stories Loki appeared. Really didn't help that Loki:[=AoA=] was one of the titles stealth cancelled (read: ended without an official word about it to this day) before the relaunch and also one without a clear follow-up giving its fans the impression that Marvel ''expects'' them to pick up the new Thor title for their Loki fix[[note]]As the book sold pretty solidly around 20 000 physical copies that's a sizeable reader base, and many of them gave Marvel the benefit of the doubt but see for example the YMMV on Comicbook/AForce how they got burned[[/note]].

to:

** The ComicBook/AllNewAllDifferentMarvel relaunch's handling of Loki. Both in regards to Loki's design (where he's regained his second horn and gloves but still has a torn jacket, and has gained PermaStubble PermaStubble, that resembles pubes glued to his chin, when Loki's typically been clean shaven, and is now explicitly an adult when previously appeared to be in a young adult form) and his characterization (where its teased he might be returning to villainy, but its not clear if this is just Loki tricking the villains), has been devisive between those who are glad to have Loki back and enjoy the way he's being handled, and those (mostly fans of ''ComicBook/LokiAgentOfAsgard'') who are less thrilled with how he appears to have forgoed the character development from that run and the differing characterization between now and how God of Stories Loki appeared. Really didn't help that Loki:[=AoA=] was one of the titles stealth cancelled (read: ended without an official word about it to this day) before the relaunch and also one without a clear follow-up giving its fans the impression that Marvel ''expects'' them to pick up the new Thor title for their Loki fix[[note]]As the book sold pretty solidly around 20 000 physical copies that's a sizeable reader base, and many of them gave Marvel the benefit of the doubt but see for example the YMMV on Comicbook/AForce how they got burned[[/note]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FanNickname: Not a good one, but sections of 4chan and reddit have taken to calling her Whor.

to:

* FanNickname: Not a good one, but sections of 4chan and reddit have taken to calling her Whor. In more neutral places Thordis (as reference to the "What if...") and [[spoiler:Jane]]!Thor.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FanNickname: Not a good one, but sections of 4chan and reddit have taken to calling her Whor.

Added: 5583

Changed: 365

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Stuff from the Mighty Thor page that concerns this series.


* {{Anvilicious}}:
** When the new female Thor picked up Thor's hammer, the inscription placed on it transformed from "If he be worthy" to "If '''''s'''he'' be worthy", just to [[{{pun}} hammer]] home that it's not just men who can wield it.
** Titania is shown as suddenly having a problem with fighting other women when she meets the female Thor, when her very introduction was as an antagonist of ComicBook/SheHulk and she had no such issues there.
* ArcFatigue: The mystery of the female Thor's real identity dragged ''on and on and on''. Most people stopped caring by the time it was revealed to be [[spoiler: Jane Foster]]. Didn't help that those issues [[FourLinesAllWaiting juggled two more plotlines]], namely Odin's quest to get back the hammer no matter what (failed) ''and'' Malekith's dealings to get Laufey resurrected (succeeded).



* BrokenBase: The reveal of who she really is further splits the fandom. Some actually would've ''preferred'' it if Lady Thor was [[spoiler: Roz Solomon]] instead of [[spoiler: Jane Foster]], since they find her more interesting. While some are interested in what could be done with a Thor who [[spoiler: has cancer]], others think it just gives the character a poor shelf life.

to:

* BrokenBase: BrokenBase:
**
The reveal of who she really is further splits the fandom. Some actually would've ''preferred'' it if Lady Thor was [[spoiler: Roz Solomon]] instead of [[spoiler: Jane Foster]], since they find her more interesting. While some are interested in what could be done with a Thor who [[spoiler: has cancer]], others think it just gives the character a poor shelf life.life.
** The ComicBook/AllNewAllDifferentMarvel relaunch's handling of Loki. Both in regards to Loki's design (where he's regained his second horn and gloves but still has a torn jacket, and has gained PermaStubble when Loki's typically been clean shaven, and is now explicitly an adult when previously appeared to be in a young adult form) and his characterization (where its teased he might be returning to villainy, but its not clear if this is just Loki tricking the villains), has been devisive between those who are glad to have Loki back and enjoy the way he's being handled, and those (mostly fans of ''ComicBook/LokiAgentOfAsgard'') who are less thrilled with how he appears to have forgoed the character development from that run and the differing characterization between now and how God of Stories Loki appeared. Really didn't help that Loki:[=AoA=] was one of the titles stealth cancelled (read: ended without an official word about it to this day) before the relaunch and also one without a clear follow-up giving its fans the impression that Marvel ''expects'' them to pick up the new Thor title for their Loki fix[[note]]As the book sold pretty solidly around 20 000 physical copies that's a sizeable reader base, and many of them gave Marvel the benefit of the doubt but see for example the YMMV on Comicbook/AForce how they got burned[[/note]].


Added DiffLines:

* CriticalDissonance: Professional critics seem to love the new Female Thor. Fan response, however, has been much more divisive.
* DontShootTheMessage: A number of feminist readers have expressed this view concerning the new Thor. Female superheroes ''do'' need more prominence and respect given how disproportionate the gender balance is and female readers need more characters to identify with. However, Jason Aaron's [[ReplacementScrappy handling of the character]], [[ArcFatigue the story]], [[TakeThatCritics the response to criticisms]], and multiple other points spoil it, and many are concerned that its going to just fuel misogynistic sentiment among the fandom.


Added DiffLines:

* InternetBackdraft: As expected, Female Thor has started a number of heated arguments both in favor and against. And under RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment this should be enough about it.
* {{Narm}}:
** Vol. 4, issue 3, which includes meta-subtext in a fight between Absorbing Man and female Thor, Titania's refusing to fight Thor because "girls need to stick together", and she and Thor designating Odin as an {{expy}} of "[[TheMan The Patriarchy]]".
** The fact that the original, male Thor has since stopped using his name altogether and instead just calls himself by his epithet, Odinson. In times past it might have been used as just a nickname, but discarding his given name in favor of it is not all that dramatic since it accompanies the ascension of the female Thor and just highlights how ridiculous the whole situation is.
** Issue 7 of that same volume apparently thinks "environmentalist with a gun" is a badass description for Roz Solomon.
** Dario Agger's rapid descent into becoming a ''WesternAnimation/CaptainPlanet''-tier villain whose schemes involve things like trying to increase the revenue of Roxxon's salmon hatcheries by wiping the species out in the wild through the use of genetically-altered bears that are conditioned to eat themselves to death.
* ReplacementScrappy: Due to many readers preferring the original Thor to continue helming the book, Female Thor was this before her story even started. There's issue about her using the name (Unlike Steve Rogers and Captain America, Thor is the character's legitimate name), the controversial set-up to have Thor lose his hammer (an ''Original Sin'' plot point that kidna came out of nowhere and hasn't been explained), and the design of her costume.
* RescuedFromTheScrappyHeap: The new Thor, at least to some, became this when they revealed she was [[spoiler: Jane Foster, fighting cancer]], due largely because it added a lot of depth to the character and because it finally put one serious source of ArcFatigue to rest.
* StrawmanHasAPoint: Absorbing Man is depicted as a [[StrawMisogynist misogynist jerk]] for objecting to female Thor using the title, but many fans thought that he had a sensible argument, namely that Female Thor should forge her own identity rather than riding Thor's coattails.
* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: Some of the reactions to the new female Thor.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Because she didn't. She went just by the Goddess of Thunder for the first couple of issues and the editorial mandate for her being Thor is presented in-comic as Thor Odinson's idea. The whole thing seems to be a huge identity crisis for the character as exemplified by the tome containing this part of his story found by his granddaughters in the ''Last Days of Midgard'' arc of ''Thor: God of Thunder''. '''It was hidden and chained shut.'''

to:

** Because she didn't. She went just by the Goddess of Thunder for the first couple of issues and the editorial mandate for her being Thor is presented in-comic as Thor Odinson's idea. The whole thing seems to be a huge identity crisis for the character as exemplified by the tome containing this part of his story found by his granddaughters in the ''Last Days of Midgard'' arc last issue of ''Thor: God of Thunder''. '''It was hidden and chained shut.'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Because she didn't. She went just by the Goddess of Thunder for the first couple of issues and the editorial mandate for her being Thor is presented in-comic as Thor Odinson's idea. The whole thing seems to be a huge identity crisis for the character as exemplified by the tome containing this part of his story found by his granddaughters in the ''Last Days of Midgard'' arc of ''Thor: God of Thunder''. '''It was hidden and chained shut.''

to:

** Because she didn't. She went just by the Goddess of Thunder for the first couple of issues and the editorial mandate for her being Thor is presented in-comic as Thor Odinson's idea. The whole thing seems to be a huge identity crisis for the character as exemplified by the tome containing this part of his story found by his granddaughters in the ''Last Days of Midgard'' arc of ''Thor: God of Thunder''. '''It was hidden and chained shut.'''''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Some have also pointed out that the ''Thor: God of Thunder'' series, specifically the arc ''Godbomb'', spoils the fact that Thor himself will reclaim the hammer eventually, as some events he mentions to his younger self have already happened in current books, making some wonder why [[spoiler: Jane]] has taken Thor's name instead of just the hammer and powers.

to:

** Some have also pointed out that the ''Thor: God of Thunder'' series, specifically the arc ''Godbomb'', spoils the fact that Thor himself will reclaim the hammer eventually, as some events he mentions to his younger self have already happened in current books, making some wonder why [[spoiler: Jane]] has taken Thor's name instead of just the hammer and powers.powers.
** Because she didn't. She went just by the Goddess of Thunder for the first couple of issues and the editorial mandate for her being Thor is presented in-comic as Thor Odinson's idea. The whole thing seems to be a huge identity crisis for the character as exemplified by the tome containing this part of his story found by his granddaughters in the ''Last Days of Midgard'' arc of ''Thor: God of Thunder''. '''It was hidden and chained shut.''
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* InNameOnly: Many do not like that she has Thor's name, rather than simply having her own identity with the Hammer. At least one fan decided to address the issue in a video, seen [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kTcKaI6450 here]], in an attempt to explain why some had, and some still do have, a problem with it. It basically boiled down to the idea that while many will accept that Jane has the hammer, they do not find her using Thor's actual ''name'' appropriate. Mainly due to the fact that Thor's name is, in fact, his actual ''name'', not a costumed identity. The only other character in Marvel to use the hammer and name without being directly connected in some manner to Thor himself was an alternate reality 22nd century hero whose real name is Dargo, but it's hinted that in his case, Thor was ''dead'' in that era, and thus Dargo is a legacy hero. The fact that Thor himself is actually ''alive'' while [[spoiler: Jane]] is running around with Mjolnir is what kills it for many readers.

to:

* InNameOnly: Many do not like that she has Thor's name, rather than simply having her own identity with the Hammer. At least one fan decided to address the issue in a video, seen [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kTcKaI6450 here]], in an attempt to explain why some had, and some still do have, a problem with it. It basically boiled down to the idea that while many will accept that Jane [[spoiler: Jane]] has the hammer, they do not find her using Thor's actual ''name'' appropriate. Mainly due to the fact that Thor's name is, in fact, his actual ''name'', not a costumed identity. The only other character in Marvel to use the hammer and name without being directly connected in some manner to Thor himself was an alternate reality 22nd century hero whose real name is Dargo, but it's hinted that in his case, Thor was ''dead'' in that era, and thus Dargo is a legacy hero. The fact that Thor himself is actually ''alive'' while [[spoiler: Jane]] is running around with Mjolnir is what kills it for many readers.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* InNameOnly: Many do not like that she has Thor's name, rather than simply having her own identity with the Hammer. At least one fan decided to address the issue in a video, seen [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kTcKaI6450 here]], in an attempt to explain why some had, and some still do have, a problem with it. It basically boiled down to the idea that while many will accept that Jane has the hammer, they do not find her using Thor's actual ''name'' appropriate. Mainly due to the fact that Thor's name is, in fact, his actual ''name'', not a costumed identity. The only other character in Marvel to use the hammer and name without being directly connected in some manner to Thor himself was an alternate reality 22nd century hero whose real name is Dargo, but it's hinted that in his case, Thor was ''dead'' in that era, and thus Dargo is a legacy hero. The fact that Thor himself is actually ''alive'' is what kills it for many readers.
** Some have also pointed out that the ''Thor: God of Thunder'' series, specifically the arc ''Godbomb'', spoils the fact that Thor himself will reclaim the hammer eventually, as some events he mentions to his younger self have already happened in current books, making some wonder why Jane has taken Thor's name instead of just the hammer and powers.

to:

* InNameOnly: Many do not like that she has Thor's name, rather than simply having her own identity with the Hammer. At least one fan decided to address the issue in a video, seen [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kTcKaI6450 here]], in an attempt to explain why some had, and some still do have, a problem with it. It basically boiled down to the idea that while many will accept that Jane has the hammer, they do not find her using Thor's actual ''name'' appropriate. Mainly due to the fact that Thor's name is, in fact, his actual ''name'', not a costumed identity. The only other character in Marvel to use the hammer and name without being directly connected in some manner to Thor himself was an alternate reality 22nd century hero whose real name is Dargo, but it's hinted that in his case, Thor was ''dead'' in that era, and thus Dargo is a legacy hero. The fact that Thor himself is actually ''alive'' while [[spoiler: Jane]] is running around with Mjolnir is what kills it for many readers.
** Some have also pointed out that the ''Thor: God of Thunder'' series, specifically the arc ''Godbomb'', spoils the fact that Thor himself will reclaim the hammer eventually, as some events he mentions to his younger self have already happened in current books, making some wonder why Jane [[spoiler: Jane]] has taken Thor's name instead of just the hammer and powers.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* InNameOnly: Many do not like that she has Thor's name, rather than simply having her own identity with the Hammer. At least one fan decided to address the issue in a video, seen [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kTcKaI6450 here]], in an attempt to explain why some had, and some still do have, a problem with it. It basically boiled down to the idea that while many will accept that Jane has the hammer, they do not find her using Thor's actual ''name'' appropriate. Mainly due to the fact that Thor's name is, in fact, his actual ''name'', not a costumed identity. The only other character in Marvel to use the hammer and name without being directly connected in some manner to Thor himself was an alternate reality 22nd century hero Dargo, but it's hinted that in his case, Thor was ''dead'' in that era, and thus Dargo is a legacy hero. The fact that Thor himself is actually ''alive'' is what kills it for many readers.

to:

* InNameOnly: Many do not like that she has Thor's name, rather than simply having her own identity with the Hammer. At least one fan decided to address the issue in a video, seen [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kTcKaI6450 here]], in an attempt to explain why some had, and some still do have, a problem with it. It basically boiled down to the idea that while many will accept that Jane has the hammer, they do not find her using Thor's actual ''name'' appropriate. Mainly due to the fact that Thor's name is, in fact, his actual ''name'', not a costumed identity. The only other character in Marvel to use the hammer and name without being directly connected in some manner to Thor himself was an alternate reality 22nd century hero whose real name is Dargo, but it's hinted that in his case, Thor was ''dead'' in that era, and thus Dargo is a legacy hero. The fact that Thor himself is actually ''alive'' is what kills it for many readers.

Added: 351

Changed: 457

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* InNameOnly: Many do not like that she has Thor's name, rather than simply having her own identity with the Hammer. At least one fan decided to address the issue in a video, seen [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kTcKaI6450 here]], in an attempt to explain why some had, and some still do have, a problem with it. It basically boiled down to the idea that while many will accept that Jane has the hammer, they do not find her using Thor's actual ''name'' appropriate.

to:

* InNameOnly: Many do not like that she has Thor's name, rather than simply having her own identity with the Hammer. At least one fan decided to address the issue in a video, seen [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kTcKaI6450 here]], in an attempt to explain why some had, and some still do have, a problem with it. It basically boiled down to the idea that while many will accept that Jane has the hammer, they do not find her using Thor's actual ''name'' appropriate. Mainly due to the fact that Thor's name is, in fact, his actual ''name'', not a costumed identity. The only other character in Marvel to use the hammer and name without being directly connected in some manner to Thor himself was an alternate reality 22nd century hero Dargo, but it's hinted that in his case, Thor was ''dead'' in that era, and thus Dargo is a legacy hero. The fact that Thor himself is actually ''alive'' is what kills it for many readers.
** Some have also pointed out that the ''Thor: God of Thunder'' series, specifically the arc ''Godbomb'', spoils the fact that Thor himself will reclaim the hammer eventually, as some events he mentions to his younger self have already happened in current books, making some wonder why Jane has taken Thor's name instead of just the hammer and powers.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* InNameOnly: Many do not like that she has Thor's name, rather than simply having her own identity with the Hammer. At least one fan decided to address the issue in a video, seen [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kTcKaI6450 here]] in an attempt to explain why some had, and some still do have, a problem with it. It basically boiled down to the idea that while many will accept that Jane has the hammer, they do not find her using Thor's actual ''name'' appropriate.

to:

* InNameOnly: Many do not like that she has Thor's name, rather than simply having her own identity with the Hammer. At least one fan decided to address the issue in a video, seen [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kTcKaI6450 here]] here]], in an attempt to explain why some had, and some still do have, a problem with it. It basically boiled down to the idea that while many will accept that Jane has the hammer, they do not find her using Thor's actual ''name'' appropriate.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ContestedSequel: Either a case of {{Sequelitis}} or EvenBetterSequel, as Jason Aaron's ''Thor: God of Thunder'' was pretty well-liked by readers.

to:

* ContestedSequel: Either a case of {{Sequelitis}} or EvenBetterSequel, as Jason Aaron's ''Thor: God of Thunder'' was pretty well-liked by readers.readers.
* InNameOnly: Many do not like that she has Thor's name, rather than simply having her own identity with the Hammer. At least one fan decided to address the issue in a video, seen [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kTcKaI6450 here]] in an attempt to explain why some had, and some still do have, a problem with it. It basically boiled down to the idea that while many will accept that Jane has the hammer, they do not find her using Thor's actual ''name'' appropriate.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Actually Thunderstrike WAS Thor as long he had Mjölnir he just got the spirit of the god too not just the hammer (and became Thunderstrike when they got separated and got his own hammer. The next Thunderstrike never owned Mjölnir to begin with), Beta Ray Bill was Beta Ray Bill from the beginning and only wielded the hammer for some issues before getting his own. I\'m in the middle of rereading ALL the Thor comics.


** Despite previous wielders of the hammer getting their own superhero names (like Thunderstrike or Beta Ray Bill), she is just 'Girl Thor'.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Despite previous wielders of the hammer getting their own superhero names (like Thunderstrike or Beta Ray Bill), she is just 'Girl Thor'.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Oops, didn\'t realise we weren\'t supposed to add this to work pages, moving.


* {{Anvilicious}}: A common criticism of the book is how heavy handed the feminism is, and nowhere is this more apparent than in the fight between Thor and the Destroyer. Odinson calls on all the women he suspected of being Thor (which apparently includes every woman he's ever met) to help in the fight when Frigga questions how they'll stop it. Frigga proceeds to shout what may as well be, "girl power!" Many readers also noted that there are ''no men'' among the group, even though it would've been pretty easy for Odinson to round some up while finding the Amazon Army, and felt the feminist series even ''more'' Anvilicous, at best, and sexist at worst.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[Anvilicious]]: A common criticism of the book is how heavy handed the feminism is, and nowhere is this more apparent than in the fight between Thor and the Destroyer. Odinson calls on all the women he suspected of being Thor (which apparently includes every woman he's ever met) to help in the fight when Frigga questions how they'll stop it. Frigga proceeds to shout what may as well be, "girl power!" Many readers also noted that there are ''no men'' among the group, and felt the feminist series even ''more'' Anvilicous, at best, and sexist at worst.

to:

* [[Anvilicious]]: {{Anvilicious}}: A common criticism of the book is how heavy handed the feminism is, and nowhere is this more apparent than in the fight between Thor and the Destroyer. Odinson calls on all the women he suspected of being Thor (which apparently includes every woman he's ever met) to help in the fight when Frigga questions how they'll stop it. Frigga proceeds to shout what may as well be, "girl power!" Many readers also noted that there are ''no men'' among the group, even though it would've been pretty easy for Odinson to round some up while finding the Amazon Army, and felt the feminist series even ''more'' Anvilicous, at best, and sexist at worst.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* [[Anvilicious]]: A common criticism of the book is how heavy handed the feminism is, and nowhere is this more apparent than in the fight between Thor and the Destroyer. Odinson calls on all the women he suspected of being Thor (which apparently includes every woman he's ever met) to help in the fight when Frigga questions how they'll stop it. Frigga proceeds to shout what may as well be, "girl power!" Many readers also noted that there are ''no men'' among the group, and felt the feminist series even ''more'' Anvilicous, at best, and sexist at worst.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenBase: The reveal of who she really is further splits the fandom. Some actually would've ''preferred'' it if Lady Thor was [[spoiler: Roz Solomon]] instead of [[spoiler: Jane Foster]], since they find her more interesting. While some are interested in what could be done with a Thor who [[spoiler: has cancer]], others think it just gives the character a poor shelf life.

to:

* BrokenBase: The reveal of who she really is further splits the fandom. Some actually would've ''preferred'' it if Lady Thor was [[spoiler: Roz Solomon]] instead of [[spoiler: Jane Foster]], since they find her more interesting. While some are interested in what could be done with a Thor who [[spoiler: has cancer]], others think it just gives the character a poor shelf life.life.
* ContestedSequel: Either a case of {{Sequelitis}} or EvenBetterSequel, as Jason Aaron's ''Thor: God of Thunder'' was pretty well-liked by readers.

Added: 378

Changed: 59

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BaseBreaker: Female Thor herself. A major change to a beloved character is always going to be met with resistance, but some accuse the comic of just being feminist propaganda given how some of the stories play out. The reveal of who she really is further splits the fandom.

to:

* BaseBreaker: Female Thor herself. A major change to a beloved character is always going to be met with resistance, but some accuse the comic of just being feminist propaganda given how some of the stories play out. out.
* BrokenBase:
The reveal of who she really is further splits the fandom.fandom. Some actually would've ''preferred'' it if Lady Thor was [[spoiler: Roz Solomon]] instead of [[spoiler: Jane Foster]], since they find her more interesting. While some are interested in what could be done with a Thor who [[spoiler: has cancer]], others think it just gives the character a poor shelf life.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BaseBreaker: Well a major change to a beloved character is always going to be met with resistance, but some accuse the comic of just being feminist propaganda. The reveal of who she really is further splits the fandom.

to:

* BaseBreaker: Well a Female Thor herself. A major change to a beloved character is always going to be met with resistance, but some accuse the comic of just being feminist propaganda.propaganda given how some of the stories play out. The reveal of who she really is further splits the fandom.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BaseBreaker: Female Thor fans of Odinson were not exactly welcoming of her. It only got worse as some accused the comic of just being feminist propaganda. But after the reveal of who Thor really is som fans have become more accepting of the new Goddess of Thunder.

to:

* BaseBreaker: Female Thor fans of Odinson were not exactly welcoming of her. It only got worse as Well a major change to a beloved character is always going to be met with resistance, but some accused accuse the comic of just being feminist propaganda. But after the The reveal of who Thor she really is som fans have become more accepting of further splits the new Goddess of Thunder.fandom.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BaseBreaker: Female Thor fans of Odinson were not exactly welcoming of her. It only got worse as some accused the comic of just being feminist propaganda. But after the reveal of who Thor really is som fans have become more accepting of the new Goddess of Thunder.

Top