Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
** In Issue #11, Betty Brant's brother Bennett turned out to be a criminal and later [[RedemptionEqualsDeath died redeeming himself]]. While this turn of events was well-received [[SeinfeldIsUnfunny due to being surprising and novel at the time]], similar plotlines would happen over and over again, to the point that nowadays, readers half-expect that whenever somebody new enters Peter's social circle, they'll turn out to have some kind of DarkSecret and then get killed off.
to:
** In Issue #11, Betty Brant's brother Bennett turned out to be a criminal and later [[RedemptionEqualsDeath died redeeming himself]]. While this turn of events was well-received [[SeinfeldIsUnfunny [[OnceOriginalNowCommon due to being surprising and novel at the time]], similar plotlines would happen over and over again, to the point that nowadays, readers half-expect that whenever somebody new enters Peter's social circle, they'll turn out to have some kind of DarkSecret and then get killed off.
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* HeartwarmingInHindsight: Spider-Man's rocky interactions with a lot of the guest star Marvel superheroes throughout this run can become this knowing full well that in a few years or so, many of them would become some of his closest friends and allies, in particular the Fantastic Four.
to:
* HeartwarmingInHindsight: HarsherInHindsight: Flash's attempt to save Spider-Man's dignity and reputation by dressing up and trying to fight a bunch of hardened criminals almost gets him at best beaten up, at worst almost killed. While these later actions were nothing short of heroic, Flash's attempts to emulate his idol in his adult years would lead to him losing his legs in Iraq and later ([[ComicBookDeath temporarily]]) killed by the [[ComicBook/GoDownSwinging Red Goblin]].
* HeartwarmingInHindsight:
** Spider-Man's rocky interactions with a lot of the guest star Marvel superheroes throughout this run can become this knowing full well that in a few years or so, many of them would become some of his closest friends and allies, in particular the FantasticFour.Four.
** Similarly, Flash and Peter's antagonism towards each other, considering how close the two would become in their respective adulthoods.
* HeartwarmingInHindsight:
** Spider-Man's rocky interactions with a lot of the guest star Marvel superheroes throughout this run can become this knowing full well that in a few years or so, many of them would become some of his closest friends and allies, in particular the Fantastic
** Similarly, Flash and Peter's antagonism towards each other, considering how close the two would become in their respective adulthoods.
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* SeinfeldIsUnfunny: It can be hard to appreciate what an impression Spider-Man made when it came out since so many of the comics that follow were influenced by it:
to:
* SeinfeldIsUnfunny: OnceOriginalNowCommon: It can be hard to appreciate what an impression Spider-Man made when it came out since so many of the comics that follow were influenced by it:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
** The one most people bring up, and which was recreated in ''WesternAnimation/TheSpectacularSpiderMan'' and ''Film/SpiderManHomecoming'' is the sequence from the Master Planner arc, "If this be my destiny" where Spider-Man lifts up the pile of machinery by HeroicWillpower.
to:
** The one most people bring up, and which was recreated in ''WesternAnimation/TheSpectacularSpiderMan'' and ''Film/SpiderManHomecoming'' is the sequence from the Master Planner arc, "If this be my destiny" This Be My Destiny...!" where Spider-Man lifts up the pile of machinery by HeroicWillpower.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
** "If This Be My Destiny", the famous ending to the Master Planner StoryArc, includes the iconic moment where Spider-Man lifts a piece of machinery that weighs as much as a locomotive through sheer willpower. While this remains a beloved part of the Spider-Man mythos, Spidey winning through RightMakesMight has since been overused to the point of being borderline groanworthy, and it's now joked that the webslinger could defeat an entire army if he had righteousness on his side.
to:
** "If This Be My Destiny", "ComicBook/IfThisBeMyDestiny", the famous ending to the Master Planner StoryArc, includes the iconic moment where Spider-Man lifts a piece of machinery that weighs as much as a locomotive through sheer willpower. While this remains a beloved part of the Spider-Man mythos, Spidey winning through RightMakesMight has since been overused to the point of being borderline groanworthy, and it's now joked that the webslinger could defeat an entire army if he had righteousness on his side.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* HeartwarmingInHindsight: Spider-Man's rocky interactions with a lot of the guest star Marvel superheroes throughout this run can become this knowing full well that in a few years or so, many of them would become some of his closest friends and allies, in particular the Fantastic Four.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
What An Idiot and related example deleted. What An Idiot is classed as Flame Bait and examples must stand alone, not refer to other bullets
Deleted line(s) 1 (click to see context) :
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: In regards to one of the WhatAnIdiot entries below, Aunt May's characterization in Annual #1 as a ditz who is somehow wooed by Doctor Octopus is a little curious considering that the artwork on her in that issue shows that she's actually somewhat worried about where she and Betty are. As per the Marvel Method, Stan Lee had full control over dialogue and characterization sometimes regardless of Ditko's intentions with his art. So one has to wonder what Ditko's idea was before Lee wrote May the way she did.
Deleted line(s) 31,34 (click to see context) :
* WhatAnIdiot:
** Peter's overreaction to his mask tearing open and exposing his face, leading to him fleeing from his first fight with Sandman out of fear that the villain would reveal his identity. Later comics like ''ComicBook/UltimateSpiderMan'' basically made fun of this by having Peter be unmasked, but said unmaskers point out with minor disappointment that they have no clue who the hell he is. Then again, it ''is'' an overreaction.
** Spider-Man sees a man in [[ComicBook/NormanOsborn a green halloween costume]] riding around on a mechanical broomstick. Said man offers him a job starring in a movie about Spider-Man, all the way across the country (when he has school and his Aunt to worry about), involving "real" fight scenes in which former thugs ''whom he's met before'', and said green man will try to beat him up. There's making a rookie mistake, and then there's this!
** It's genuinely amazing how Aunt May doesn't recognize infamous criminal Doctor Octopus or the fact that she and Betty are being held hostage. Becomes even more ridiculous when Peter implies this is all a DelayedReaction and she somehow just hadn't realized what happened yet.
** Peter's overreaction to his mask tearing open and exposing his face, leading to him fleeing from his first fight with Sandman out of fear that the villain would reveal his identity. Later comics like ''ComicBook/UltimateSpiderMan'' basically made fun of this by having Peter be unmasked, but said unmaskers point out with minor disappointment that they have no clue who the hell he is. Then again, it ''is'' an overreaction.
** Spider-Man sees a man in [[ComicBook/NormanOsborn a green halloween costume]] riding around on a mechanical broomstick. Said man offers him a job starring in a movie about Spider-Man, all the way across the country (when he has school and his Aunt to worry about), involving "real" fight scenes in which former thugs ''whom he's met before'', and said green man will try to beat him up. There's making a rookie mistake, and then there's this!
** It's genuinely amazing how Aunt May doesn't recognize infamous criminal Doctor Octopus or the fact that she and Betty are being held hostage. Becomes even more ridiculous when Peter implies this is all a DelayedReaction and she somehow just hadn't realized what happened yet.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
They Fight Crime is no longer a trope
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
* MyRealDaddy: Thanks to the Marvel Method and both Lee and Ditko's controversial and conflicting personalities[[note]]He's a PR-man with an [[SmallNameBigEgo inflated sense of self-importance]]. He's a Randian Objectivist and [[LonersAreFreaks weird loner.]] Together, [[TheyFightCrime they fought crime]]![[/note]] and the sheer cultural juggernaut that Spider-Man has become, ascribing credit to one more than the other is contentious. The general view is that Ditko did most of the heavy lifting in terms of story, action, and character design, but with Lee playing a crucial rule in giving the title its own unique voice, its earthiness, and its irreverence, making the entire run a true collaboration:
to:
* MyRealDaddy: Thanks to the Marvel Method and both Lee and Ditko's controversial and conflicting personalities[[note]]He's a PR-man with an [[SmallNameBigEgo inflated sense of self-importance]]. He's a Randian Objectivist and [[LonersAreFreaks weird loner.]] Together, [[TheyFightCrime they fought crime]]![[/note]] crime![[/note]] and the sheer cultural juggernaut that Spider-Man has become, ascribing credit to one more than the other is contentious. The general view is that Ditko did most of the heavy lifting in terms of story, action, and character design, but with Lee playing a crucial rule in giving the title its own unique voice, its earthiness, and its irreverence, making the entire run a true collaboration:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
** For modern readers, Frederick Foswell stands out as a compelling three-dimensional supporting character in an era lacking in them, with his own personal dynamic arc, and a cool take on the reporter-friend trope. He finally made his television debut almost 50 years later in ''WesternAnimation/TheSpectacularSpiderMan''. Until then, he was [[ForgottenFallenFriend largely forgotten]] after being casually killed off in the Lee-Romita era until ''Comicbook/DeadNoMoreTheCloneConspiracy'' revived him as a character and clone, and reviving interest in the character.
to:
** For modern readers, Frederick Foswell stands out as a compelling three-dimensional supporting character in an era lacking in them, with his own personal dynamic arc, and a cool take on the reporter-friend trope. He finally made his television debut almost 50 years later in ''WesternAnimation/TheSpectacularSpiderMan''. Until then, he was [[ForgottenFallenFriend largely forgotten]] after being casually killed off in the Lee-Romita era until ''Comicbook/DeadNoMoreTheCloneConspiracy'' ''ComicBook/DeadNoMoreTheCloneConspiracy'' revived him as a character and clone, and reviving interest in the character.
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
** Until Peter Parker, superheroes were generally "Dads and Uncles" and/or substitute authority/parental figures while teenagers and kids were sidekicks or mascots (Robin, Jimmy Olsen, Snapper Carr), generally clumsy, and obvious audience stand-ins for the small children reading at home. Even the Comicbook/FantasticFour had Reed Richards and Ben Grimm as the older characters playing off Johnny Storm, the rebellious teen kid. In contrast, teenage Peter Parker was a three-dimensional character who actually felt like a real teenager; he was flawed, nuanced and, unlike Comicbook/{{Robin}}, was the outright protagonist of his own book and got to be a superhero, a milestone in comics. [[note]]These factors also helped to cultivate the development of the still-recently created teenage demographic of comic readers.[[/note]]
to:
** Until Peter Parker, superheroes were generally "Dads and Uncles" and/or substitute authority/parental figures while teenagers and kids were sidekicks or mascots (Robin, Jimmy Olsen, Snapper Carr), generally clumsy, and obvious audience stand-ins for the small children reading at home. Even the Comicbook/FantasticFour ComicBook/FantasticFour had Reed Richards and Ben Grimm as the older characters playing off Johnny Storm, the rebellious teen kid. In contrast, teenage Peter Parker was a three-dimensional character who actually felt like a real teenager; he was flawed, nuanced and, unlike Comicbook/{{Robin}}, ComicBook/{{Robin}}, was the outright protagonist of his own book and got to be a superhero, a milestone in comics. [[note]]These factors also helped to cultivate the development of the still-recently created teenage demographic of comic readers.[[/note]]
Changed line(s) 21,22 (click to see context) from:
** ''Comicbook/SpiderGwen's'' Peter Parker borrows heavily from this interpretation in his brief appearance, where a jealous and resentful Peter (who in this version did not receive the spider-bite) creates a serum in order to gain powers (possibly out of jealousy of Spider-Gwen) in order to take revenge on the bullies who picked on him.
** [[Comicbook/DanSlottSpiderMan One horror-themed story]] from ''Comicbook/SpiderVerse'' portrays a Peter who, upon getting his powers[[note]]In this version causing him to grow hair and multiple sets of eyes[[/note]], proceeds to murder his family and love interest, playing up the misanthropic elements of the Ditko-Inspired Peter and playing him as a pseudo [[UsefulNotes/{{Columbine}} Columbine-shooter]][[note]]Which is itself based on a highly contested and problematic idea of picked-on-kids being potential school shooters which many real-life law-enforcement officials and activists repeatedly debunk as pointed out by Dave Cullen author of ''Columbine'': "Everybody knows who commits these kind of murders. They're outcasts, typically goth or other sorts of kids that dress funny and live on the fringes. That's well known. It's also wrong."[[/note]]. In Ditko's run, Peter's "misanthropic" attitude never extended to his family and loved ones, whom he always strived to protect and support financially, and felt guilty when he was unable to. Likewise, Peter never had any vengeful streak since on getting powers, he uses them to become famous as a performer and celebrity rather than getting back.
** [[Comicbook/DanSlottSpiderMan One horror-themed story]] from ''Comicbook/SpiderVerse'' portrays a Peter who, upon getting his powers[[note]]In this version causing him to grow hair and multiple sets of eyes[[/note]], proceeds to murder his family and love interest, playing up the misanthropic elements of the Ditko-Inspired Peter and playing him as a pseudo [[UsefulNotes/{{Columbine}} Columbine-shooter]][[note]]Which is itself based on a highly contested and problematic idea of picked-on-kids being potential school shooters which many real-life law-enforcement officials and activists repeatedly debunk as pointed out by Dave Cullen author of ''Columbine'': "Everybody knows who commits these kind of murders. They're outcasts, typically goth or other sorts of kids that dress funny and live on the fringes. That's well known. It's also wrong."[[/note]]. In Ditko's run, Peter's "misanthropic" attitude never extended to his family and loved ones, whom he always strived to protect and support financially, and felt guilty when he was unable to. Likewise, Peter never had any vengeful streak since on getting powers, he uses them to become famous as a performer and celebrity rather than getting back.
to:
** ''Comicbook/SpiderGwen's'' ''ComicBook/SpiderGwen's'' Peter Parker borrows heavily from this interpretation in his brief appearance, where a jealous and resentful Peter (who in this version did not receive the spider-bite) creates a serum in order to gain powers (possibly out of jealousy of Spider-Gwen) in order to take revenge on the bullies who picked on him.
**[[Comicbook/DanSlottSpiderMan [[ComicBook/TheAmazingSpiderManDanSlott One horror-themed story]] from ''Comicbook/SpiderVerse'' ''ComicBook/SpiderVerse'' portrays a Peter who, upon getting his powers[[note]]In this version causing him to grow hair and multiple sets of eyes[[/note]], proceeds to murder his family and love interest, playing up the misanthropic elements of the Ditko-Inspired Peter and playing him as a pseudo [[UsefulNotes/{{Columbine}} Columbine-shooter]][[note]]Which is itself based on a highly contested and problematic idea of picked-on-kids being potential school shooters which many real-life law-enforcement officials and activists repeatedly debunk as pointed out by Dave Cullen author of ''Columbine'': "Everybody knows who commits these kind of murders. They're outcasts, typically goth or other sorts of kids that dress funny and live on the fringes. That's well known. It's also wrong."[[/note]]. In Ditko's run, Peter's "misanthropic" attitude never extended to his family and loved ones, whom he always strived to protect and support financially, and felt guilty when he was unable to. Likewise, Peter never had any vengeful streak since on getting powers, he uses them to become famous as a performer and celebrity rather than getting back.
**
Changed line(s) 30 (click to see context) from:
** Ditko's eye for design and character creation of Spider-Man's rogues was so iconic and unique that it's considered a major achievement for Spider-Man artists and writers to create a villain as iconic as Ditko's. Comparing the [[ShortLivedBigImpact short time he worked on the book]] (five years) to the fifty plus years that followed, such instances are rare. Post-Ditko breakout-rogues include Rhino, Shocker and ComicBook/TheKingpin (Both Lee and Romita Sr., though the latter owes largely to Creator/FrankMiller), Comicbook/BlackCat (Marv Wolfman and Keith Pollard), The Hobgoblin (Creator/RogerStern and Romita Jr.), ComicBook/{{Venom}} (David Michelinie and Todd [=McFarlane=]) and most recently [[ComicBook/DanSlottSpiderMan Mr. Negative]] (Dan Slott and Phil Jimenez).
to:
** Ditko's eye for design and character creation of Spider-Man's rogues was so iconic and unique that it's considered a major achievement for Spider-Man artists and writers to create a villain as iconic as Ditko's. Comparing the [[ShortLivedBigImpact short time he worked on the book]] (five years) to the fifty plus years that followed, such instances are rare. Post-Ditko breakout-rogues include Rhino, Shocker and ComicBook/TheKingpin (Both Lee and Romita Sr., though the latter owes largely to Creator/FrankMiller), Comicbook/BlackCat ComicBook/BlackCat (Marv Wolfman and Keith Pollard), The Hobgoblin (Creator/RogerStern and Romita Jr.), ComicBook/{{Venom}} (David Michelinie and Todd [=McFarlane=]) and most recently [[ComicBook/DanSlottSpiderMan [[ComicBook/TheAmazingSpiderManDanSlott Mr. Negative]] (Dan Slott and Phil Jimenez).
Changed line(s) 33 (click to see context) from:
** Spider-Man sees a man in [[Comicbook/NormanOsborn a green halloween costume]] riding around on a mechanical broomstick. Said man offers him a job starring in a movie about Spider-Man, all the way across the country (when he has school and his Aunt to worry about), involving "real" fight scenes in which former thugs ''whom he's met before'', and said green man will try to beat him up. There's making a rookie mistake, and then there's this!
to:
** Spider-Man sees a man in [[Comicbook/NormanOsborn [[ComicBook/NormanOsborn a green halloween costume]] riding around on a mechanical broomstick. Said man offers him a job starring in a movie about Spider-Man, all the way across the country (when he has school and his Aunt to worry about), involving "real" fight scenes in which former thugs ''whom he's met before'', and said green man will try to beat him up. There's making a rookie mistake, and then there's this!
Changed line(s) 35 (click to see context) from:
* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical: There's been a long debate as to what extent Ditko's objectivism affected his conception of [[http://sequart.org/magazine/42384/the-lack-of-ditkos-objectivist-bias-in-amazing-spider-man/ Spider-Man]]. This led to, now discredited, rumors that Ditko quit the book after refusing to make Norman Osborn the Green Goblin (which Ditko himself refuted)[[note]]He had already established Norman as a crooked businessman and a murderer, and had even [[MeaningfulBackgroundEvent introduced him earlier]] as a member of Jameson's club when the Green Goblin was introduced.[[/note]]. According to Flo Steinberg, Ditko never discussed politics among co-workers and was a pretty affable guy in person, and that his Randian turn took everyone by surprise[[note]]As noted by Creator/AlanMoore, Ditko's reputation among readers when he worked on Comicbook/DoctorStrange was as a hippie author, and that it wasn't until the end of TheSixties that people caught on that Ditko was way more right-wing than previously suspected.[[/note]]. Some believe that Ditko's Randian turn only came after he left Marvel, as [[Comicbook/DoctorStrange the titles]] which he had more control over were also lacking in Objectivist politics. Ditko in later years kept referring to Spider-Man as a [[MoneyDearBoy For-Hire gig]] and that his break with Marvel and Lee was solely about credit and pay, not his politics.
to:
* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical: There's been a long debate as to what extent Ditko's objectivism affected his conception of [[http://sequart.org/magazine/42384/the-lack-of-ditkos-objectivist-bias-in-amazing-spider-man/ Spider-Man]]. This led to, now discredited, rumors that Ditko quit the book after refusing to make Norman Osborn the Green Goblin (which Ditko himself refuted)[[note]]He had already established Norman as a crooked businessman and a murderer, and had even [[MeaningfulBackgroundEvent introduced him earlier]] as a member of Jameson's club when the Green Goblin was introduced.[[/note]]. According to Flo Steinberg, Ditko never discussed politics among co-workers and was a pretty affable guy in person, and that his Randian turn took everyone by surprise[[note]]As noted by Creator/AlanMoore, Ditko's reputation among readers when he worked on Comicbook/DoctorStrange ComicBook/DoctorStrange was as a hippie author, and that it wasn't until the end of TheSixties that people caught on that Ditko was way more right-wing than previously suspected.[[/note]]. Some believe that Ditko's Randian turn only came after he left Marvel, as [[Comicbook/DoctorStrange [[ComicBook/DoctorStrange the titles]] which he had more control over were also lacking in Objectivist politics. Ditko in later years kept referring to Spider-Man as a [[MoneyDearBoy For-Hire gig]] and that his break with Marvel and Lee was solely about credit and pay, not his politics.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: In regards to one of the WhatAnIdiot entries below, Aunt May's characterization in Annual #1 as a ditz who is somehow wooed by Doctor Octopus is a little curious considering that the artwork on her in that issue shows that she's actually somewhat worried about where she and Betty are. As per the Marvel Method, Stan Lee had full control over dialogue and characterization sometimes regardless of Ditko's intentions with his art. So one has to wonder what Ditko's idea was before Lee wrote May the way she did.
* EnsembleDarkhorse: A few characters who made their short (but memorable) appearances in the run are popular with the fans:
** The Crime Master, due to his [[SharpDressedMan snazzy pinstriped suit]] and mask as well as for being a BadassNormal villain who was involved in a memorable storyline with the ''other'' (at the time) Ensemble Darkhorse, the Green Goblin. While the original Crime Master died at the end of said story, he would be brought back years later as a LegacyCharacter.
** For modern readers, Frederick Foswell stands out as a compelling three-dimensional supporting character in an era lacking in them, with his own personal dynamic arc, and a cool take on the reporter-friend trope. He finally made his television debut almost 50 years later in ''WesternAnimation/TheSpectacularSpiderMan''. Until then, he was [[ForgottenFallenFriend largely forgotten]] after being casually killed off in the Lee-Romita era until ''Comicbook/DeadNoMoreTheCloneConspiracy'' revived him as a character and clone, and reviving interest in the character.
* FirstInstallmentWins: This run is still considered ''the'' high point of the series. Many later writers and artists noted that, while there were plenty of great stories which came after, things weren't quite the same after Ditko left. John Romita Sr. admitted that he was [[ToughActToFollow nervous of following Ditko]], even viewing his early issues as just placeholding until Ditko came back.[[note]]He never did.[[/note]] Luckily Romita Sr. proved more than capable of picking up the torch, creating his own classic run of Spider-Man in the process which in turn reinvented aspects of the character that remains to this day.
* FranchiseOriginalSin: Some aspects of the comic that have garnered mockery and criticism in later years got their start here:
** In Issue #11, Betty Brant's brother Bennett turned out to be a criminal and later [[RedemptionEqualsDeath died redeeming himself]]. While this turn of events was well-received [[SeinfeldIsUnfunny due to being surprising and novel at the time]], similar plotlines would happen over and over again, to the point that nowadays, readers half-expect that whenever somebody new enters Peter's social circle, they'll turn out to have some kind of DarkSecret and then get killed off.
** "If This Be My Destiny", the famous ending to the Master Planner StoryArc, includes the iconic moment where Spider-Man lifts a piece of machinery that weighs as much as a locomotive through sheer willpower. While this remains a beloved part of the Spider-Man mythos, Spidey winning through RightMakesMight has since been overused to the point of being borderline groanworthy, and it's now joked that the webslinger could defeat an entire army if he had righteousness on his side.
* LoveToHate: Many modern audiences and a few others consider Ditko's Gwen Stacy (an almost hilariously judgmental and stuck-up AlphaBitch) the best written and most interesting version of the character and many lament how drastically her character was altered in the later run to make her likable and Peter's match which came about by entirely and repeatedly rewriting her character (who under Ditko had been written consistently at the very least). The fact that the character is now defined by codifying [[StuffedIntoTheFridge fridging]] and that Ditko presents her as the total opposite has also made many to prefer the nasty and unlikable Gwen to the saintly victim or her more recent kickass AU versions who tend to be {{Action Girl}}s without any real edges.
* MyRealDaddy: Thanks to the Marvel Method and both Lee and Ditko's controversial and conflicting personalities[[note]]He's a PR-man with an [[SmallNameBigEgo inflated sense of self-importance]]. He's a Randian Objectivist and [[LonersAreFreaks weird loner.]] Together, [[TheyFightCrime they fought crime]]![[/note]] and the sheer cultural juggernaut that Spider-Man has become, ascribing credit to one more than the other is contentious. The general view is that Ditko did most of the heavy lifting in terms of story, action, and character design, but with Lee playing a crucial rule in giving the title its own unique voice, its earthiness, and its irreverence, making the entire run a true collaboration:
** Creator/AlanMoore and many hardcore fans consider Ditko Spider-Man's true creator. The Marvel Method left much of the plotting and panel layout to the artists, leaving considerable room for ambiguity as to who made what. According to a 1960s interview, Lee says that Ditko was more or less fully plotting out the later Spider-Man issues, including Peter going to college, and the iconic Master Planner arc.
** On the other hand, Lee did all the dialogue himself and many note that J. Jonah Jameson, while having an iconic design, is largely defined by his speech patterns and distinct rhythm: entirely Lee's work. Lee also came up with "With great power..." at the end of Amazing Fantasy #15. Likewise, it's hard to imagine Spider-Man without his MotorMouth and quips, as well as Peter's [[{{Wangst}} overly introspective]] internal monologue, all of which can be credited to Lee. Ditko also confirmed that Lee at times ordered Ditko to redraw panels and scenes (which Ditko did without pay, which started his falling out with Lee and his demand for a plotting credit). Likewise, the irreverent and often-times deconstructive attitude to superheroes also stems from Lee's own frustration with the Golden and Silver Age superhero cliches and his attempt to have fun with the conventions. A good example of how hard it is to answer this question is the famous "If this be my destiny..." issue. While it was ''Ditko's'' idea to make it basically an issue length monologue, it was ''Lee'' who had to actualy write the monologue, and both of these elements are why the story is so beloved.
** The exact origins of Spider-Man is quite contentious. Lee always claimed that he got the idea from seeing a spider on a wall and that the entire story and theme came out fully formed. Creator/JackKirby later said that Lee had the merest germ of the idea which Kirby then developed (he created the idea of Spider-Man living with his Aunt and Uncle). However, Kirby's idea for Spider-Man was for him to get his powers from a magical source, and was envisioned as a stocky looking guy with a web gun, as opposed the lanky Peter. Ditko said that while he never looked at what Kirby did, Lee did go to Jack first before coming to him. Ditko insisted that it was a co-creation between him and Lee, but that the costume design and look of Peter himself (and other details) was entirely by Ditko: Peter's appearance was patterned on Ditko's own high school yearbook photo.
* NeverLiveItDown: Peter's "misanthrope" characterization. See ShallowParody below.
* SeinfeldIsUnfunny: It can be hard to appreciate what an impression Spider-Man made when it came out since so many of the comics that follow were influenced by it:
** Until Peter Parker, superheroes were generally "Dads and Uncles" and/or substitute authority/parental figures while teenagers and kids were sidekicks or mascots (Robin, Jimmy Olsen, Snapper Carr), generally clumsy, and obvious audience stand-ins for the small children reading at home. Even the Comicbook/FantasticFour had Reed Richards and Ben Grimm as the older characters playing off Johnny Storm, the rebellious teen kid. In contrast, teenage Peter Parker was a three-dimensional character who actually felt like a real teenager; he was flawed, nuanced and, unlike Comicbook/{{Robin}}, was the outright protagonist of his own book and got to be a superhero, a milestone in comics. [[note]]These factors also helped to cultivate the development of the still-recently created teenage demographic of comic readers.[[/note]]
** The SecretIdentity before Spider-Man was generally understood to be an ExcusePlot. At the time, there was never any confusion that Superman was the real guy and Clark Kent was just something he did when he wasn't Superman, or that Batman wasn't the real guy and Bruce Wayne some boring rich dude with time and money. Spider-Man insists that Peter is the central focus, and that both are inter-related: this is near-stated outright at the end of Issue 33, where the doctor states that the Peter Parker identity is the real hero kids should look up to rather than the cool Spider-Man. Later superhero comics (Superman and Batman included) inspired by Spider-Man made their heroes into more complex figures, mining the double-life and the tension it brings for dramatic effect.
** Peter's relationship with Betty Brant, while still largely male adolescent in perspective, was something that readers could more easily relate with than its contemporaries; for instance, the Superman/Lois relationship of the Gold and Silver Age was downright childish by comparison (with Lois Lane often portrayed as some kind of villainess for trying to shack up with Superman, and he often playing cruel pranks on her). Peter Parker wanted to be in a relationship and had actual dating woes with Betty Brant, accepting that there is back-and-forth in their relationship and that Betty has every right to move on and find a more compatible partner even if that rejection hurts Peter.
* ShallowParody:
** The Peter Parker of this period was written as a lot harsher and more hostile than in the comics that followed, with his earliest appearances often used as prime examples (such as his resentful pre-spider bite characterization). This, alongside Ditko's Objectivist leanings, often negatively colors later interpretations of the run, sometimes mockingly called [[ParodyName "The Misanthropic Spider-Man"]] or [[WriterOnBoard "The Amazing Objectivist"]]. These parodies will often focus on the WorldOfJerkass elements, as well as the casual sexism of the character, the {{Wangst}}, and will usually give Peter a HairTriggerTemper; these works will also generally forget to include the optimistic and humanistic elements of those same stories. The parodies also will usually [[ShooOutTheClowns leave out one of the most defining traits of the run -- the humor.]]
** ''Comicbook/SpiderGwen's'' Peter Parker borrows heavily from this interpretation in his brief appearance, where a jealous and resentful Peter (who in this version did not receive the spider-bite) creates a serum in order to gain powers (possibly out of jealousy of Spider-Gwen) in order to take revenge on the bullies who picked on him.
** [[Comicbook/DanSlottSpiderMan One horror-themed story]] from ''Comicbook/SpiderVerse'' portrays a Peter who, upon getting his powers[[note]]In this version causing him to grow hair and multiple sets of eyes[[/note]], proceeds to murder his family and love interest, playing up the misanthropic elements of the Ditko-Inspired Peter and playing him as a pseudo [[UsefulNotes/{{Columbine}} Columbine-shooter]][[note]]Which is itself based on a highly contested and problematic idea of picked-on-kids being potential school shooters which many real-life law-enforcement officials and activists repeatedly debunk as pointed out by Dave Cullen author of ''Columbine'': "Everybody knows who commits these kind of murders. They're outcasts, typically goth or other sorts of kids that dress funny and live on the fringes. That's well known. It's also wrong."[[/note]]. In Ditko's run, Peter's "misanthropic" attitude never extended to his family and loved ones, whom he always strived to protect and support financially, and felt guilty when he was unable to. Likewise, Peter never had any vengeful streak since on getting powers, he uses them to become famous as a performer and celebrity rather than getting back.
** ''The Megalomaniacal Spider-Man'', created in 2002 by underground comic artist Peter Bagge, was specifically created as a TakeThat against Steve Ditko and a {{Deconstruction}} of Objectivism as a whole, with the setting and design of the main character being based on this era's Spider-Man. While the comic does try to present Ditko's tendency towards WriterOnBoard, the comic used {{Flanderized}} versions of Ditko's characters to make its points, making it this trope.
** People who call it in objectivist mouthpiece forget an important note of Spider-Man's character, WithGreatPowerComesGreatResponsibility, if it was written to advocate for objectivism the story wouldn't bat an eye at Spider-Man using his powers for his own gain.
** These parodies often only look at Steve Ditko political leanings and argue that Spider-Man was an objectivist mouthpiece rarely bring up the other co-creator Stan Lee, the writer. While there have been debates over who really created Spider-Man, Lee certainly left his impact on the creation of Spider-Man and Lee certainly was not an objectivist.
* SignatureScene:
** The one most people bring up, and which was recreated in ''WesternAnimation/TheSpectacularSpiderMan'' and ''Film/SpiderManHomecoming'' is the sequence from the Master Planner arc, "If this be my destiny" where Spider-Man lifts up the pile of machinery by HeroicWillpower.
** The college protest scene is also quite notorious, and often seen as early evidence of Ditko's [[WriterOnBoard Objectivist leanings.]]
* ToughActToFollow: Averted with John Romita Sr., who was fearful that he would become this, but admirably rose to the occasion with his instant classic "Goblin Unmasked" storyline.
** Ditko's eye for design and character creation of Spider-Man's rogues was so iconic and unique that it's considered a major achievement for Spider-Man artists and writers to create a villain as iconic as Ditko's. Comparing the [[ShortLivedBigImpact short time he worked on the book]] (five years) to the fifty plus years that followed, such instances are rare. Post-Ditko breakout-rogues include Rhino, Shocker and ComicBook/TheKingpin (Both Lee and Romita Sr., though the latter owes largely to Creator/FrankMiller), Comicbook/BlackCat (Marv Wolfman and Keith Pollard), The Hobgoblin (Creator/RogerStern and Romita Jr.), ComicBook/{{Venom}} (David Michelinie and Todd [=McFarlane=]) and most recently [[ComicBook/DanSlottSpiderMan Mr. Negative]] (Dan Slott and Phil Jimenez).
* WhatAnIdiot:
** Peter's overreaction to his mask tearing open and exposing his face, leading to him fleeing from his first fight with Sandman out of fear that the villain would reveal his identity. Later comics like ''ComicBook/UltimateSpiderMan'' basically made fun of this by having Peter be unmasked, but said unmaskers point out with minor disappointment that they have no clue who the hell he is. Then again, it ''is'' an overreaction.
** Spider-Man sees a man in [[Comicbook/NormanOsborn a green halloween costume]] riding around on a mechanical broomstick. Said man offers him a job starring in a movie about Spider-Man, all the way across the country (when he has school and his Aunt to worry about), involving "real" fight scenes in which former thugs ''whom he's met before'', and said green man will try to beat him up. There's making a rookie mistake, and then there's this!
** It's genuinely amazing how Aunt May doesn't recognize infamous criminal Doctor Octopus or the fact that she and Betty are being held hostage. Becomes even more ridiculous when Peter implies this is all a DelayedReaction and she somehow just hadn't realized what happened yet.
* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical: There's been a long debate as to what extent Ditko's objectivism affected his conception of [[http://sequart.org/magazine/42384/the-lack-of-ditkos-objectivist-bias-in-amazing-spider-man/ Spider-Man]]. This led to, now discredited, rumors that Ditko quit the book after refusing to make Norman Osborn the Green Goblin (which Ditko himself refuted)[[note]]He had already established Norman as a crooked businessman and a murderer, and had even [[MeaningfulBackgroundEvent introduced him earlier]] as a member of Jameson's club when the Green Goblin was introduced.[[/note]]. According to Flo Steinberg, Ditko never discussed politics among co-workers and was a pretty affable guy in person, and that his Randian turn took everyone by surprise[[note]]As noted by Creator/AlanMoore, Ditko's reputation among readers when he worked on Comicbook/DoctorStrange was as a hippie author, and that it wasn't until the end of TheSixties that people caught on that Ditko was way more right-wing than previously suspected.[[/note]]. Some believe that Ditko's Randian turn only came after he left Marvel, as [[Comicbook/DoctorStrange the titles]] which he had more control over were also lacking in Objectivist politics. Ditko in later years kept referring to Spider-Man as a [[MoneyDearBoy For-Hire gig]] and that his break with Marvel and Lee was solely about credit and pay, not his politics.
----
* EnsembleDarkhorse: A few characters who made their short (but memorable) appearances in the run are popular with the fans:
** The Crime Master, due to his [[SharpDressedMan snazzy pinstriped suit]] and mask as well as for being a BadassNormal villain who was involved in a memorable storyline with the ''other'' (at the time) Ensemble Darkhorse, the Green Goblin. While the original Crime Master died at the end of said story, he would be brought back years later as a LegacyCharacter.
** For modern readers, Frederick Foswell stands out as a compelling three-dimensional supporting character in an era lacking in them, with his own personal dynamic arc, and a cool take on the reporter-friend trope. He finally made his television debut almost 50 years later in ''WesternAnimation/TheSpectacularSpiderMan''. Until then, he was [[ForgottenFallenFriend largely forgotten]] after being casually killed off in the Lee-Romita era until ''Comicbook/DeadNoMoreTheCloneConspiracy'' revived him as a character and clone, and reviving interest in the character.
* FirstInstallmentWins: This run is still considered ''the'' high point of the series. Many later writers and artists noted that, while there were plenty of great stories which came after, things weren't quite the same after Ditko left. John Romita Sr. admitted that he was [[ToughActToFollow nervous of following Ditko]], even viewing his early issues as just placeholding until Ditko came back.[[note]]He never did.[[/note]] Luckily Romita Sr. proved more than capable of picking up the torch, creating his own classic run of Spider-Man in the process which in turn reinvented aspects of the character that remains to this day.
* FranchiseOriginalSin: Some aspects of the comic that have garnered mockery and criticism in later years got their start here:
** In Issue #11, Betty Brant's brother Bennett turned out to be a criminal and later [[RedemptionEqualsDeath died redeeming himself]]. While this turn of events was well-received [[SeinfeldIsUnfunny due to being surprising and novel at the time]], similar plotlines would happen over and over again, to the point that nowadays, readers half-expect that whenever somebody new enters Peter's social circle, they'll turn out to have some kind of DarkSecret and then get killed off.
** "If This Be My Destiny", the famous ending to the Master Planner StoryArc, includes the iconic moment where Spider-Man lifts a piece of machinery that weighs as much as a locomotive through sheer willpower. While this remains a beloved part of the Spider-Man mythos, Spidey winning through RightMakesMight has since been overused to the point of being borderline groanworthy, and it's now joked that the webslinger could defeat an entire army if he had righteousness on his side.
* LoveToHate: Many modern audiences and a few others consider Ditko's Gwen Stacy (an almost hilariously judgmental and stuck-up AlphaBitch) the best written and most interesting version of the character and many lament how drastically her character was altered in the later run to make her likable and Peter's match which came about by entirely and repeatedly rewriting her character (who under Ditko had been written consistently at the very least). The fact that the character is now defined by codifying [[StuffedIntoTheFridge fridging]] and that Ditko presents her as the total opposite has also made many to prefer the nasty and unlikable Gwen to the saintly victim or her more recent kickass AU versions who tend to be {{Action Girl}}s without any real edges.
* MyRealDaddy: Thanks to the Marvel Method and both Lee and Ditko's controversial and conflicting personalities[[note]]He's a PR-man with an [[SmallNameBigEgo inflated sense of self-importance]]. He's a Randian Objectivist and [[LonersAreFreaks weird loner.]] Together, [[TheyFightCrime they fought crime]]![[/note]] and the sheer cultural juggernaut that Spider-Man has become, ascribing credit to one more than the other is contentious. The general view is that Ditko did most of the heavy lifting in terms of story, action, and character design, but with Lee playing a crucial rule in giving the title its own unique voice, its earthiness, and its irreverence, making the entire run a true collaboration:
** Creator/AlanMoore and many hardcore fans consider Ditko Spider-Man's true creator. The Marvel Method left much of the plotting and panel layout to the artists, leaving considerable room for ambiguity as to who made what. According to a 1960s interview, Lee says that Ditko was more or less fully plotting out the later Spider-Man issues, including Peter going to college, and the iconic Master Planner arc.
** On the other hand, Lee did all the dialogue himself and many note that J. Jonah Jameson, while having an iconic design, is largely defined by his speech patterns and distinct rhythm: entirely Lee's work. Lee also came up with "With great power..." at the end of Amazing Fantasy #15. Likewise, it's hard to imagine Spider-Man without his MotorMouth and quips, as well as Peter's [[{{Wangst}} overly introspective]] internal monologue, all of which can be credited to Lee. Ditko also confirmed that Lee at times ordered Ditko to redraw panels and scenes (which Ditko did without pay, which started his falling out with Lee and his demand for a plotting credit). Likewise, the irreverent and often-times deconstructive attitude to superheroes also stems from Lee's own frustration with the Golden and Silver Age superhero cliches and his attempt to have fun with the conventions. A good example of how hard it is to answer this question is the famous "If this be my destiny..." issue. While it was ''Ditko's'' idea to make it basically an issue length monologue, it was ''Lee'' who had to actualy write the monologue, and both of these elements are why the story is so beloved.
** The exact origins of Spider-Man is quite contentious. Lee always claimed that he got the idea from seeing a spider on a wall and that the entire story and theme came out fully formed. Creator/JackKirby later said that Lee had the merest germ of the idea which Kirby then developed (he created the idea of Spider-Man living with his Aunt and Uncle). However, Kirby's idea for Spider-Man was for him to get his powers from a magical source, and was envisioned as a stocky looking guy with a web gun, as opposed the lanky Peter. Ditko said that while he never looked at what Kirby did, Lee did go to Jack first before coming to him. Ditko insisted that it was a co-creation between him and Lee, but that the costume design and look of Peter himself (and other details) was entirely by Ditko: Peter's appearance was patterned on Ditko's own high school yearbook photo.
* NeverLiveItDown: Peter's "misanthrope" characterization. See ShallowParody below.
* SeinfeldIsUnfunny: It can be hard to appreciate what an impression Spider-Man made when it came out since so many of the comics that follow were influenced by it:
** Until Peter Parker, superheroes were generally "Dads and Uncles" and/or substitute authority/parental figures while teenagers and kids were sidekicks or mascots (Robin, Jimmy Olsen, Snapper Carr), generally clumsy, and obvious audience stand-ins for the small children reading at home. Even the Comicbook/FantasticFour had Reed Richards and Ben Grimm as the older characters playing off Johnny Storm, the rebellious teen kid. In contrast, teenage Peter Parker was a three-dimensional character who actually felt like a real teenager; he was flawed, nuanced and, unlike Comicbook/{{Robin}}, was the outright protagonist of his own book and got to be a superhero, a milestone in comics. [[note]]These factors also helped to cultivate the development of the still-recently created teenage demographic of comic readers.[[/note]]
** The SecretIdentity before Spider-Man was generally understood to be an ExcusePlot. At the time, there was never any confusion that Superman was the real guy and Clark Kent was just something he did when he wasn't Superman, or that Batman wasn't the real guy and Bruce Wayne some boring rich dude with time and money. Spider-Man insists that Peter is the central focus, and that both are inter-related: this is near-stated outright at the end of Issue 33, where the doctor states that the Peter Parker identity is the real hero kids should look up to rather than the cool Spider-Man. Later superhero comics (Superman and Batman included) inspired by Spider-Man made their heroes into more complex figures, mining the double-life and the tension it brings for dramatic effect.
** Peter's relationship with Betty Brant, while still largely male adolescent in perspective, was something that readers could more easily relate with than its contemporaries; for instance, the Superman/Lois relationship of the Gold and Silver Age was downright childish by comparison (with Lois Lane often portrayed as some kind of villainess for trying to shack up with Superman, and he often playing cruel pranks on her). Peter Parker wanted to be in a relationship and had actual dating woes with Betty Brant, accepting that there is back-and-forth in their relationship and that Betty has every right to move on and find a more compatible partner even if that rejection hurts Peter.
* ShallowParody:
** The Peter Parker of this period was written as a lot harsher and more hostile than in the comics that followed, with his earliest appearances often used as prime examples (such as his resentful pre-spider bite characterization). This, alongside Ditko's Objectivist leanings, often negatively colors later interpretations of the run, sometimes mockingly called [[ParodyName "The Misanthropic Spider-Man"]] or [[WriterOnBoard "The Amazing Objectivist"]]. These parodies will often focus on the WorldOfJerkass elements, as well as the casual sexism of the character, the {{Wangst}}, and will usually give Peter a HairTriggerTemper; these works will also generally forget to include the optimistic and humanistic elements of those same stories. The parodies also will usually [[ShooOutTheClowns leave out one of the most defining traits of the run -- the humor.]]
** ''Comicbook/SpiderGwen's'' Peter Parker borrows heavily from this interpretation in his brief appearance, where a jealous and resentful Peter (who in this version did not receive the spider-bite) creates a serum in order to gain powers (possibly out of jealousy of Spider-Gwen) in order to take revenge on the bullies who picked on him.
** [[Comicbook/DanSlottSpiderMan One horror-themed story]] from ''Comicbook/SpiderVerse'' portrays a Peter who, upon getting his powers[[note]]In this version causing him to grow hair and multiple sets of eyes[[/note]], proceeds to murder his family and love interest, playing up the misanthropic elements of the Ditko-Inspired Peter and playing him as a pseudo [[UsefulNotes/{{Columbine}} Columbine-shooter]][[note]]Which is itself based on a highly contested and problematic idea of picked-on-kids being potential school shooters which many real-life law-enforcement officials and activists repeatedly debunk as pointed out by Dave Cullen author of ''Columbine'': "Everybody knows who commits these kind of murders. They're outcasts, typically goth or other sorts of kids that dress funny and live on the fringes. That's well known. It's also wrong."[[/note]]. In Ditko's run, Peter's "misanthropic" attitude never extended to his family and loved ones, whom he always strived to protect and support financially, and felt guilty when he was unable to. Likewise, Peter never had any vengeful streak since on getting powers, he uses them to become famous as a performer and celebrity rather than getting back.
** ''The Megalomaniacal Spider-Man'', created in 2002 by underground comic artist Peter Bagge, was specifically created as a TakeThat against Steve Ditko and a {{Deconstruction}} of Objectivism as a whole, with the setting and design of the main character being based on this era's Spider-Man. While the comic does try to present Ditko's tendency towards WriterOnBoard, the comic used {{Flanderized}} versions of Ditko's characters to make its points, making it this trope.
** People who call it in objectivist mouthpiece forget an important note of Spider-Man's character, WithGreatPowerComesGreatResponsibility, if it was written to advocate for objectivism the story wouldn't bat an eye at Spider-Man using his powers for his own gain.
** These parodies often only look at Steve Ditko political leanings and argue that Spider-Man was an objectivist mouthpiece rarely bring up the other co-creator Stan Lee, the writer. While there have been debates over who really created Spider-Man, Lee certainly left his impact on the creation of Spider-Man and Lee certainly was not an objectivist.
* SignatureScene:
** The one most people bring up, and which was recreated in ''WesternAnimation/TheSpectacularSpiderMan'' and ''Film/SpiderManHomecoming'' is the sequence from the Master Planner arc, "If this be my destiny" where Spider-Man lifts up the pile of machinery by HeroicWillpower.
** The college protest scene is also quite notorious, and often seen as early evidence of Ditko's [[WriterOnBoard Objectivist leanings.]]
* ToughActToFollow: Averted with John Romita Sr., who was fearful that he would become this, but admirably rose to the occasion with his instant classic "Goblin Unmasked" storyline.
** Ditko's eye for design and character creation of Spider-Man's rogues was so iconic and unique that it's considered a major achievement for Spider-Man artists and writers to create a villain as iconic as Ditko's. Comparing the [[ShortLivedBigImpact short time he worked on the book]] (five years) to the fifty plus years that followed, such instances are rare. Post-Ditko breakout-rogues include Rhino, Shocker and ComicBook/TheKingpin (Both Lee and Romita Sr., though the latter owes largely to Creator/FrankMiller), Comicbook/BlackCat (Marv Wolfman and Keith Pollard), The Hobgoblin (Creator/RogerStern and Romita Jr.), ComicBook/{{Venom}} (David Michelinie and Todd [=McFarlane=]) and most recently [[ComicBook/DanSlottSpiderMan Mr. Negative]] (Dan Slott and Phil Jimenez).
* WhatAnIdiot:
** Peter's overreaction to his mask tearing open and exposing his face, leading to him fleeing from his first fight with Sandman out of fear that the villain would reveal his identity. Later comics like ''ComicBook/UltimateSpiderMan'' basically made fun of this by having Peter be unmasked, but said unmaskers point out with minor disappointment that they have no clue who the hell he is. Then again, it ''is'' an overreaction.
** Spider-Man sees a man in [[Comicbook/NormanOsborn a green halloween costume]] riding around on a mechanical broomstick. Said man offers him a job starring in a movie about Spider-Man, all the way across the country (when he has school and his Aunt to worry about), involving "real" fight scenes in which former thugs ''whom he's met before'', and said green man will try to beat him up. There's making a rookie mistake, and then there's this!
** It's genuinely amazing how Aunt May doesn't recognize infamous criminal Doctor Octopus or the fact that she and Betty are being held hostage. Becomes even more ridiculous when Peter implies this is all a DelayedReaction and she somehow just hadn't realized what happened yet.
* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical: There's been a long debate as to what extent Ditko's objectivism affected his conception of [[http://sequart.org/magazine/42384/the-lack-of-ditkos-objectivist-bias-in-amazing-spider-man/ Spider-Man]]. This led to, now discredited, rumors that Ditko quit the book after refusing to make Norman Osborn the Green Goblin (which Ditko himself refuted)[[note]]He had already established Norman as a crooked businessman and a murderer, and had even [[MeaningfulBackgroundEvent introduced him earlier]] as a member of Jameson's club when the Green Goblin was introduced.[[/note]]. According to Flo Steinberg, Ditko never discussed politics among co-workers and was a pretty affable guy in person, and that his Randian turn took everyone by surprise[[note]]As noted by Creator/AlanMoore, Ditko's reputation among readers when he worked on Comicbook/DoctorStrange was as a hippie author, and that it wasn't until the end of TheSixties that people caught on that Ditko was way more right-wing than previously suspected.[[/note]]. Some believe that Ditko's Randian turn only came after he left Marvel, as [[Comicbook/DoctorStrange the titles]] which he had more control over were also lacking in Objectivist politics. Ditko in later years kept referring to Spider-Man as a [[MoneyDearBoy For-Hire gig]] and that his break with Marvel and Lee was solely about credit and pay, not his politics.
----
