Follow TV Tropes

Following

History WebVideo / FoldingIdeas

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* PropagandaPiece: Discussed in ''About That Idris Elba Gold Documentary'' as being one of the primary failings of the film. Dan argues that gold and its impact on culture across the world is a subject that is interesting enough to warrant a documentary. Because ''Gold: A Journey With Idris Elba'' is (by The World Gold's Council's own admission) a propaganda piece made to attract potential investors and please stockholders, it's unwilling to actually engage with any one topic in-depth out of fear of addressing some of the more unsavory aspects of the gold industry (Gold being a significant part of India's unlawful dowry system, pit lakes and the impact gold mining has on the environment, etc). What is left is ultimately a painfully boring slog that exists primarily to sell a product, rather than say anything insightful about its subject matter.

Added: 386

Removed: 382

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* OnceOriginalNowCommon: [[invoked]] Briefly brought up in his video on the Nostalgia Critic's review of ''The Wall'', when discussing the film itself Dan notes that, after decades of other works that explored similar themes as ''The Wall'', or made use of similar aesthetics directly inspired by its imagery, it can look quite "juvenile" in its use of abstract symbolism by comparison.



* SeinfeldIsUnfunny: [[invoked]] Briefly brought up in his video on the Nostalgia Critic's review of ''The Wall'', when discussing the film itself Dan notes that, after decades of other works that explored similar themes as ''The Wall'', or made use of similar aesthetics directly inspired by its imagery, it can look quite "juvenile" in its use of abstract symbolism by comparison.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not necessary but funny

Added DiffLines:

** The pinned comment lists timestamps for Amy activity.

Changed: 720

Removed: 722

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DramaticallyMissingThePoint: All over the place in "Nostalgia Critic and The Wall". Dan overall argument is that Doug Walker has failed to engage with the movie and the concepts within it with any degree of good faith, emotional honesty, or contextual information.
** In the case of "We Need More Victimization", Doug's parody of "Another Brick in the Wall", Doug criticizes the song as whiny and full of edgy teenager angst because it is about how school sucks. Dan argues that this is not really what the song is about, and that Doug is not taking in context the differences between Doug's own suburban education in 80/90s America compared to Roger Waters education in a post-WWII era England. He is also missing the argument Waters makes about who is in charge of education, it's not just that teachers suck, but that education is an institution that is heavily influenced by what industrialists want and that attempt to shape children into workers, rather than thinking human beings.

to:

* DramaticallyMissingThePoint: All over the place in "Nostalgia Critic and The Wall". Dan overall argument is that Doug Walker has failed to engage with the movie and the concepts within it with any degree of good faith, emotional honesty, or contextual information.
**
information. In the case of "We Need More Victimization", Doug's parody of "Another Brick in the Wall", Doug criticizes the song as whiny and full of edgy teenager angst because it is about how school sucks. Dan argues that this is not really what the song is about, and that Doug is not taking in context the differences between Doug's own suburban education in 80/90s America compared to Roger Waters education in a post-WWII era England. He is also missing the argument Waters makes about who is in charge of education, it's not just that teachers suck, but that education is an institution that is heavily influenced by what industrialists want and that attempt to shape children into workers, rather than thinking human beings.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


** The end of "This is Financial Advice" manages to be even ''bleaker,'' especially as Dan argues that as [[ConspiracyTheorist paranoid,]] [[EntitledBastard selfish,]] [[AwfulWeddedLife resentful,]] [[ConMan dishonest,]] [[TheGamblingAddict impulsive,]] and all-around [[TooDumbToLive foolish]] as Apes are, ''even they'' don't deserve to be exploited like this.
--->'''Dan:''' The grim irony of Ape culture is that it has the ''operative mechanisms'' of a gambling addiction... without actually gambling. See, if it were a gamble, if they were truly betting on something, [[WhamLine then there would be some actual odds of winning.]] Apes like to talk about [[DeathorGloryAttack "high risk, high reward"]] as a coping mechanism, as the mismanaged companies they're betting on continue to slide out of business, but all framing devices like that assume that the thing that you're betting on can actually ''happen.'' But the weakest team in the league can, theoretically, [[UnderdogsNeverLose pull out a dark-horse run and take the cup.]] ''That's'' a high-risk, high-reward bet. Apes, on the other hand, with their [[ApocalypseCult theories of MOASS,]] with their [[ThereAreNoCoincidences "Cohencidences"]] and Icahn secret reverse-triangle mergers, with their [[InsaneTrollLogic fundamental misunderstanding of how a short sale even works...]] they're sitting around a blackjack table convincing each other that there's a secret rule, that if you hit 31 the dealer has to give you their entire tray. So hit me! [[TragicMistake Hit me!]] [[DeathByMaterialism Hit me!]] [[MadnessMantra Hit me!]]

to:

** The end of "This is Financial Advice" manages to be even ''bleaker,'' especially as Dan argues that as [[ConspiracyTheorist paranoid,]] [[EntitledBastard selfish,]] [[AwfulWeddedLife resentful,]] [[ConMan dishonest,]] [[TheGamblingAddict impulsive,]] paranoid, selfish, resentful, impulsive, and all-around [[TooDumbToLive foolish]] foolish as Apes are, ''even they'' don't deserve to be exploited like this.
--->'''Dan:''' The grim irony of Ape culture is that it has the ''operative mechanisms'' of a gambling addiction... without actually gambling. See, if it were a gamble, if they were truly betting on something, [[WhamLine then there would be some actual odds of winning.]] Apes like to talk about [[DeathorGloryAttack "high risk, high reward"]] reward" as a coping mechanism, as the mismanaged companies they're betting on continue to slide out of business, but all framing devices like that assume that the thing that you're betting on can actually ''happen.'' But the weakest team in the league can, theoretically, [[UnderdogsNeverLose pull out a dark-horse run and take the cup.]] cup. ''That's'' a high-risk, high-reward bet. Apes, on the other hand, with their [[ApocalypseCult theories of MOASS,]] with their [[ThereAreNoCoincidences "Cohencidences"]] and Icahn secret reverse-triangle mergers, with their [[InsaneTrollLogic fundamental misunderstanding of how a short sale even works...]] they're sitting around a blackjack table convincing each other that there's a secret rule, that if you hit 31 the dealer has to give you their entire tray. So hit me! [[TragicMistake Hit me!]] [[DeathByMaterialism me! Hit me!]] [[MadnessMantra me! Hit me!]]me!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FromBadToWorse: The Apes' grasp on reality in "This is Financial Advice". They think that Gamestop or some other stock with any loose connection to it will someday trigger a short squeeze that will decimate the economy, and they'll get rich from it. As reality kicks them in the face more and more, the coping conspiracy theories get crazier and crazier.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The end of "This is Financial Advice" manages to be even ''bleaker,'' especially as Dan argues that as [[ConspiracyTheorist paranoid,]] [[EntitledBastard selfish,]] [[AwfulWeddedLife resentful,]] [[ConMan dishonest,]] [[GamblingAddict impulsive,]] and all-around [[TooDumbToLive foolish]] as Apes are, ''even they'' don't deserve to be exploited like this.

to:

** The end of "This is Financial Advice" manages to be even ''bleaker,'' especially as Dan argues that as [[ConspiracyTheorist paranoid,]] [[EntitledBastard selfish,]] [[AwfulWeddedLife resentful,]] [[ConMan dishonest,]] [[GamblingAddict [[TheGamblingAddict impulsive,]] and all-around [[TooDumbToLive foolish]] as Apes are, ''even they'' don't deserve to be exploited like this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The end of "This is Financial Advice" manages to be even ''bleaker,'' especially as Dan argues that as [[ConspiracyTheorist paranoid,]] [[EntitledBastard selfish,]] [[AwfulWeddedLife resentful,]] [[ConMan dishonest,]] [[GamblingAddict impulsive,]] and all-around [[TooDumbToLive foolish]] as Apes are, ''even they'' don't deserve to be exploited like this.
--->'''Dan:''' The grim irony of Ape culture is that it has the ''operative mechanisms'' of a gambling addiction... without actually gambling. See, if it were a gamble, if they were truly betting on something, [[WhamLine then there would be some actual odds of winning.]] Apes like to talk about [[DeathorGloryAttack "high risk, high reward"]] as a coping mechanism, as the mismanaged companies they're betting on continue to slide out of business, but all framing devices like that assume that the thing that you're betting on can actually ''happen.'' But the weakest team in the league can, theoretically, [[UnderdogsNeverLose pull out a dark-horse run and take the cup.]] ''That's'' a high-risk, high-reward bet. Apes, on the other hand, with their [[ApocalypseCult theories of MOASS,]] with their [[ThereAreNoCoincidences "Cohencidences"]] and Icahn secret reverse-triangle mergers, with their [[InsaneTrollLogic fundamental misunderstanding of how a short sale even works...]] they're sitting around a blackjack table convincing each other that there's a secret rule, that if you hit 31 the dealer has to give you their entire tray. So hit me! [[TragicMistake Hit me!]] [[DeathByMaterialism Hit me!]] [[MadnessMantra Hit me!]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In "The Line Goes Up - the problem with [=NFTs=]", he notes that Ethereum is a net improvement over Bitcoin, which he immediately clarifies is "not hard -- Bitcoin sucks".
** His "This is Financial Advice" video has him retroactively apply this to crypto enthusiasts compared to "Apes". While cryptocurrency enthusiasts will twist themselves into knots trying to explain why a company failing is [[FailureGambit actually a good thing]] (usually, that it strengthens the industry as a whole), they will at least acknowledge that the company ''is'' going bankrupt, whereas Apes will continue to insist that the company or its stock will rebound any moment now.

to:

** In "The Line ''Line Goes Up - the problem with The Problem With [=NFTs=]", he notes that Ethereum is a net improvement over Bitcoin, which he immediately clarifies is "not hard -- Bitcoin sucks".
** His "This is ''This Is Financial Advice" video Advice'' has him retroactively apply this to crypto enthusiasts compared to "Apes". While cryptocurrency enthusiasts will twist themselves into knots trying to explain why a company failing is [[FailureGambit actually a good thing]] (usually, that it strengthens the industry as a whole), they will at least acknowledge that the company ''is'' going bankrupt, whereas Apes will continue to insist that the company or its stock will rebound any moment now.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ConfirmationBias: Discussed in regards to "Ape DD" (Due Diligence). He explains that Due Diligence is actually a in-depth, thorough study to check the possible pros and cons of an investment, it's meant to be as much an argument to buy something as it is to not buy; however, Apes have a vested interest in buying and convince others to buy GMS, so their Due Diligence is entirely a way to find new reasons to invest on [=GameStop=] while downplaying or outright ignoring reasons not to.

to:

* ConfirmationBias: Discussed in regards to "Ape DD" (Due Diligence). He Dan explains that real Due Diligence is actually a in-depth, thorough study investigation to check the possible pros and cons of an investment, investment: it's meant supposed to be as much an argument to for why you ''shouldn't'' buy something the asset as it is to not buy; however, an argument why you should. But Apes have a vested interest in buying GME and convince others convincing other people to buy GMS, it too, so their Due Diligence self-proclaimed "Due Diligence" is entirely a way to find come up with new reasons to invest on buy and hold [=GameStop=] while downplaying or outright ignoring reasons not to.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ConfirmationBias: Discussed in regards to "Ape DD" (Due Diligence). He explains that Due Diligence is actually a in-depth, thorough study to check the possible pros and cons of an investment, it's meant to be as much an argument to buy something as it is to not buy; however, Apes have a vested interest in buying and convince others to buy GMS, so their Due Diligence is entirely a way to find new reasons to invest on [=GameStop=] while downplaying or outright ignoring reasons not to.

Added: 1727

Changed: 1029

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* KnowNothingKnowItAll: He discusses this regularly in terms of crypto and blockchain advocates. In his view, understanding how crypto and the blockchain and the many adjacent technologies are supposed to work is quite difficult, and many people can struggle to get the full picture beyond the basics. However, this means that people who ''do'' understand crypto have a tendency to assume their intelligence there will transfer to intelligence everywhere else, since understanding a complicated thing must mean that presumably less complicated things are therefore child's play. This leads to a lot of advocates bragging about how the blockchain will solve any given problem, while demonstrating a lack of even basic knowledge regarding that problem--for instance, claiming that crypto is the perfect answer to fraud, since it's less susceptible to money being hacked out of your account, ignoring that this method of fraud already has layers of protection against it and isn't considered a real problem by banks [[HollywoodHacking outside of movies]].

to:

* KnowNothingKnowItAll: KnowNothingKnowItAll:
**
He discusses this regularly in terms of crypto and blockchain advocates. In his view, understanding how crypto and the blockchain and the many adjacent technologies are supposed to work is quite difficult, and many people can struggle to get the full picture beyond the basics. However, this means that people who ''do'' understand crypto have a tendency to assume their intelligence there will transfer to intelligence everywhere else, since understanding a complicated thing must mean that presumably less complicated things are therefore child's play. This leads to a lot of advocates bragging about how the blockchain will solve any given problem, while demonstrating a lack of even basic knowledge regarding that problem--for instance, claiming that crypto is the perfect answer to fraud, since it's less susceptible to money being hacked out of your account, ignoring that this method of fraud already has layers of protection against it and isn't considered a real problem by banks [[HollywoodHacking outside of movies]].movies]].
** "This is Financial Advice" discusses the tendency among meme stock investors to put together long and inaccurate "informational" posts about how the stock market actually works, usually from people who will ''openly admit in the posts'' that they don't know much about the stock market, but nevertheless think they're helping the community by attempting to parse a complicated topic for them. In particular, he singles out an overreliance on analogy and decoding techniques; essentially, Apes reading anything complex about securities trading will tend to find something, ''anything'' that they can understand, and will attempt to use that as a Rosetta Stone to parse the rest of the material.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Really, every version of MOASS (from the same video) is this. If it happened, apes would (in theory) get crazy money for their gamestop shares; enough to seriously impact or straight-up destroy the economy. They not only think the U.S Government will just hand that money over, they think life will be peachy living in a devastated economy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Dan points to the entire concept of the Metaverse as seen in ''Literature/SnowCrash'' and ''Literature/ReadyPlayerOne'' and other works as this in ''The Future is a Dead Mall'' - even when decoupled from how awful Decentraland's implementation of these concepts is. The idea of a contiguous virtual space that's mapping the internet like a physical space sounds cool in an abstract or as a literary device because plot devices don't need to consider the limitation and various complications real life use brings up. The more you think about it, the more you realize that such spaces are inherently worst at everything you'd want them to do than a webpage might be. From certain designs who by their very nature will block all line of sights from neighbors, the fact that humans can navigate a grid of items on a shopping site faster and more efficiently than physically navigate a virtual store filled with virtual goods or the fact that one can move between webpages faster than one can move across physical space.

to:

** Dan points to the entire concept of the Metaverse as seen in ''Literature/SnowCrash'' and ''Literature/ReadyPlayerOne'' and other works as this in ''The Future is a Dead Mall'' - even when decoupled from how awful Decentraland's implementation of these concepts is. The idea of a contiguous virtual space that's mapping the internet like a physical space sounds cool in an abstract or as a literary device because plot devices don't need to consider the limitation and various complications real life use brings up. The more you think about it, the more you realize that such spaces are inherently worst worse at everything you'd want them to do than a webpage might be. From certain designs who by their very nature will block all line of sights from neighbors, the fact that humans can navigate a grid of items on a shopping site faster and more efficiently than physically navigate a virtual store filled with virtual goods or the fact that one can move between webpages faster than one can move across physical space.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''Folding Ideas'' is a Website/YouTube media analysis show hosted and written by Dan Olson (aka Foldable Human). His style is relatively analytical among other internet {{review}}ers, mostly observing works within their cultural context rather than from a fan's point of view. Originally, Dan used 'Foldy,' a puppet talking box, to serve as the host of the show, with Foldy acting as the channel's icon. Over time Dan began filming himself in front of the camera more and more, to the point where it became the standard and Foldy was more a curious historical note. Similarly the channel's focus also evolved from relatively short videos using individual media to discuss various elements of filmaking, fandom, or pop culture, to long form videos on various topics such as internet cooking videos, conspiracy theories, [=NFTs=], internet gifts, among others.

to:

''Folding Ideas'' is a Website/YouTube media analysis show hosted and written by Dan Olson (aka Foldable Human). His style is relatively analytical among other internet {{review}}ers, mostly observing works within their cultural context rather than from a fan's point of view. Originally, Dan used 'Foldy,' a puppet talking box, to serve as the host of the show, with Foldy acting as the channel's icon. Over time Dan began filming himself in front of the camera more and more, to the point where it became the standard and Foldy was more a curious historical note. Similarly the channel's focus also evolved from relatively short videos using individual media to discuss various elements of filmaking, fandom, or pop culture, to long form videos on various topics such as internet cooking videos, conspiracy theories, [=NFTs=], internet gifts, grifts, among others.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* NetworkDecay: Dan discusses the concept obliquely in ''What Is Vsauce?'', contrasting the concept as it traditionally applies to TV Channels vs Youtube Channels. TV, with distinct shows and programing allows for a more noticeable and visible shift when the programing changes. While Youtube, lacking such a structure, lends itself to far more gradual changes that are no less severe, but make it harder to pin down a channel's identity. At the same time the ability to go back to earlier video lets you better keep track of a channel's history. Dan takes VSauce's various shifts as an example, a channel that started as very crude game humor, evolving through various "phases" to lavishly produced production documentary, the at the time current "Mind Field".)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In "Line Goes Up", Dan begins by talking about the 2008 financial crisis, explaining it in detail. This allows the viewer, through the video to realize how much of Crypto, and NFT in particular, mirrors what lead to the crisis, despite much of Crypto being born as a supposed answer to the crisis - without Dan needing to actually point it out. One example is how much of the crisis was built out of companies creating dummy, valueless morgages they could then package into bonds to sell to make the line go up. Dan later mirrors this when mentioning how the original "valuable" [=NFTs=] of stuff like original reddit memes and actual high effort art were in finite supply, so crypto fans had to turn to something else to make the line go up, leading to the stuff like the Apes and other worthless procedurally generated art NFT that became the face of the concept.

to:

** In "Line Goes Up", Dan begins by talking about the 2008 financial crisis, explaining it in detail. This allows the viewer, through the video to realize how much of Crypto, and NFT in particular, mirrors what lead led to the crisis, despite much of Crypto being born as a supposed answer to the crisis - without Dan needing to actually point it out. One example is how much of the crisis was built out of companies creating dummy, valueless morgages mortgages they could then package into bonds to sell to make the line go up. Dan later mirrors this when mentioning how the original "valuable" [=NFTs=] of stuff like original reddit memes and actual high effort art were in finite supply, so crypto fans had to turn to something else to make the line go up, leading to the stuff like the Apes and other worthless procedurally generated art NFT that became the face of the concept.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GoneHorriblyRight: In ''This Is Financial Advice'' Dan covers the story of Keith Gill, aka [=DeepFuckingValue=], a man who wanted to be a financial social media influencer. Keith began by making rather accurate predictions that [=GameStop=] had more value that the market though it did and that there were lots of ways [=GameStop=] could fix their decline. Then January 2021 happened and [=GameStop=]'s stock exploded. Keith made millions off of it, but the Apes also rallied around him as some sort of messianic figure. Keith had to go before Congress to prove he didn't do anything wrong (which Dan believes he genuinely didn't), after which he had to confront the fact that the Apes had begun to interpret anything he said or did as coded messages to their movement. This proved to be both a legal risk to his newfound wealth (as he could be accused of market manipulation if something he said caused the Apes to act en masse) and a physical risk to him and his family (Apes aren't the most stable of people and a lot of them like to talk about how they own guns), so Keith deleted all his social media accounts and walked off into the sunset.

to:

* GoneHorriblyRight: In ''This Is Financial Advice'' Dan covers the story of Keith Gill, aka [=DeepFuckingValue=], a man who wanted to be a financial social media influencer. Keith began by making rather accurate potentially reasonable predictions that [=GameStop=] had more value that than the market though thought it did and that there were lots of ways [=GameStop=] could fix their decline. Then January 2021 happened and [=GameStop=]'s stock exploded. Keith made millions off of it, but the Apes also rallied around him as some sort of messianic figure. Keith had to go before Congress to prove he didn't do anything wrong (which Dan believes he genuinely didn't), after which he had to confront the fact that the Apes had begun to interpret anything he said or did as coded messages to their movement. This proved to be both a legal risk to his newfound wealth (as he could be accused of market manipulation if something he said caused the Apes to act en masse) and a physical risk to him and his family (Apes aren't the most stable of people and a lot of them like to talk about how they own guns), so Keith deleted all his social media accounts and walked off into the sunset.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GoneHorriblyRight: In ''This Is Financial Advice'' Dan covers the story of Keith Gill, aka [=DeepFuckingValue=], a man who wanted to be a financial social media influencer. He began by making rather accurate predictions that [=GameStop=] had more value that the market though it did and that there were lots of ways [=GameStop=] could fix their decline. Then January 2021 happened and [=GameStop=]'s stock exploded. Keith made millions off of it, but the Apes also rallied around him as some sort of messianic figure. Keith had to go before Congress to prove he didn't do anything wrong (which Dan believes he genuinely didn't) and then realized that he was now in a position where he could say or do anything without Apes reacting to his every word. This proved to be both a legal risk to his newfound wealth (as he could be accused of market manipulation if something he said caused the Apes to act en masse) and a physical risk to him and his family (Apes aren't the most stable of people and a lot of them like to talk about how they own guns), so Keith deleted all his social media accounts and walked off into the sunset.

to:

* GoneHorriblyRight: In ''This Is Financial Advice'' Dan covers the story of Keith Gill, aka [=DeepFuckingValue=], a man who wanted to be a financial social media influencer. He Keith began by making rather accurate predictions that [=GameStop=] had more value that the market though it did and that there were lots of ways [=GameStop=] could fix their decline. Then January 2021 happened and [=GameStop=]'s stock exploded. Keith made millions off of it, but the Apes also rallied around him as some sort of messianic figure. Keith had to go before Congress to prove he didn't do anything wrong (which Dan believes he genuinely didn't) and then realized didn't), after which he had to confront the fact that he was now in a position where he could say or do the Apes had begun to interpret anything without Apes reacting he said or did as coded messages to his every word.their movement. This proved to be both a legal risk to his newfound wealth (as he could be accused of market manipulation if something he said caused the Apes to act en masse) and a physical risk to him and his family (Apes aren't the most stable of people and a lot of them like to talk about how they own guns), so Keith deleted all his social media accounts and walked off into the sunset.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TechnologyMarchesOn[[invoked]]: Discussed towards the end of "Bakshi and the Ring", where Dan makes the case that Ralph Bakshi's adaptation of ''Literature/TheLordOfTheRings'' is like a 2010s blockbuster movie made with 1970s resources; all these years later, countless effects-heavy movies paint over live actors and place their performances in an animated world.

to:

* TechnologyMarchesOn[[invoked]]: Discussed towards the end of "Bakshi and the Ring", where Dan makes the case that Ralph Bakshi's adaptation of ''Literature/TheLordOfTheRings'' is like a 2010s blockbuster movie made with 1970s resources; technology; all these years later, countless effects-heavy movies paint over live actors and place their performances in an animated world.



** At one point in ''Line Goes Up'', Dan refers to cryptocurrency as "the hobbyhorse of a few thousand gambling addicts", and later, he discusses an attempt to make a crypto funded casino, whose whit epaper proudly opens "Welcome to the white paper, fellow gamblers!"
** In ''The Future Is A Dead Mall'', Dan observes that the only part of Decentraland to get any amount of regular traffic is a single poker table at a casino, and then points out that the rest of the many, many casinos therein were similarly well occupied before all the games were shut down due to a combination of [[GameBreakingBug bugs that made them regularly eat inputs]] and falling afoul of real world gambling laws.

to:

** At one point in ''Line Goes Up'', Dan refers to cryptocurrency as "the hobbyhorse of a few thousand gambling addicts", and later, he discusses an attempt to make a crypto funded casino, whose whit epaper white paper proudly opens "Welcome to the white paper, fellow gamblers!"
** In ''The Future Is A Dead Mall'', Dan observes that the only part of Decentraland to get any amount of regular traffic is a single poker table at a casino, and then points out that the rest of the many, many casinos therein were similarly well occupied well-attended before all the games were shut down due to a combination of [[GameBreakingBug bugs that made them regularly eat inputs]] and falling running afoul of real world gambling laws.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GoneHorriblyRight: In ''This Is Financial Advice'' Dan covers the story of Keith Gill, aka [=DeepFuckingValue=], a man who wanted to be a financial social media influencer. He began by making rather accurate predictions that [=GameStop=] had more value that the market though it did and that there were lots of ways [=GameStop=] could fix their decline. Then January 2021 happened and [=GameStop=]'s stock exploded. Keith made millions off of it, but the Apes also rallied around him as some sort of messianic figure. Keith had to go before Congress to prove he didn't do anything wrong (which Dan believes he genuinely didn't) and then realized that he was not in a position where he could say or do anything without Apes reacting to his every word. This proved to be both a legal risk to his newfound wealth (as he could be accused of market manipulation if something he said caused the Apes to act en masse) and a physical risk to him and his family (Apes aren't the most stable of people and a lot of them like to talk about how they own guns), so Keith deleted all his social media accounts and walked off into the sunset.

to:

* GoneHorriblyRight: In ''This Is Financial Advice'' Dan covers the story of Keith Gill, aka [=DeepFuckingValue=], a man who wanted to be a financial social media influencer. He began by making rather accurate predictions that [=GameStop=] had more value that the market though it did and that there were lots of ways [=GameStop=] could fix their decline. Then January 2021 happened and [=GameStop=]'s stock exploded. Keith made millions off of it, but the Apes also rallied around him as some sort of messianic figure. Keith had to go before Congress to prove he didn't do anything wrong (which Dan believes he genuinely didn't) and then realized that he was not now in a position where he could say or do anything without Apes reacting to his every word. This proved to be both a legal risk to his newfound wealth (as he could be accused of market manipulation if something he said caused the Apes to act en masse) and a physical risk to him and his family (Apes aren't the most stable of people and a lot of them like to talk about how they own guns), so Keith deleted all his social media accounts and walked off into the sunset.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheGamblingAddict: Much of Dan's output from ''Line Goes Up'' onwards has been about the psychological similarities between gambling addicts and various primarily-online finance types:
** At one point in ''Line Goes Up'', Dan refers to cryptocurrency as "the hobbyhorse of a few thousand gambling addicts", and later, he discusses an attempt to make a crypto funded casino, whose whit epaper proudly opens "Welcome to the white paper, fellow gamblers!"
** In ''The Future Is A Dead Mall'', Dan observes that the only part of Decentraland to get any amount of regular traffic is a single poker table at a casino, and then points out that the rest of the many, many casinos therein were similarly well occupied before all the games were shut down due to a combination of [[GameBreakingBug bugs that made them regularly eat inputs]] and falling afoul of real world gambling laws.
** At the end of ''This Is Financial Advice'', Dan explicitly describes the points in common between GME Apes and gambling addicts: a singleminded obsession with their hobby and spending all their time not engaged with it talking about how eager they are to get more money with which to engage it with, fantasizing about what they'll do when they finally hit it big and especially [[WhosLaughingNow of lording their success over everyone who told them to stop]], deep-seated resentment of the people in their lives judging them for their addiction, and stealing from their family to fund their hobby. Despite all this, Dan ultimately ends on the conclusion that Apes ''aren't'' gambling addicts ... [[DamnedByFaintPraise because "gambling" implies the odds of success are above zero]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AssholeVictim: Defied in ''This is Financial Advice''. He admits that the Apes don't seem like good people and lists reasons why so (they're conspiratorially minded to the point of verging into antisemitism, they're planning to crash the global economy with no thought about what will be the damages normal people might suffer, and regularly confess to lying to their spouses and families about the state of their shared finances due to a gambling addiction), that being said, he argues that nobody deserves to be so grifted and brainwashed that the only way forward is to become a grifter themselves.

to:

* AssholeVictim: Defied Deconstructed in ''This is Financial Advice''. He admits that the Apes don't seem like good people and lists reasons why so (they're conspiratorially minded to the point of verging into antisemitism, they're planning to crash the global economy with no thought about what will be the damages normal people might suffer, and regularly confess to lying to their spouses and families about the state of their shared finances due to a gambling addiction), that being said, he argues that nobody deserves to be so grifted and brainwashed that the only way forward is to become a grifter themselves.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->''"The US government wrote off the GME squeeze as a one-off viral event and let everyone off the hook, but if the Apes get their wish and really do deliberately risk collapsing the US or global economy after several years of organising - yeah I think the US federal government would sooner make that RICO filing then give u/hoplias literally billions of dollars for his shares in GameStop."''

to:

-->''"The US government wrote off the GME squeeze as a one-off viral event and let everyone off the hook, but if the Apes get their wish and really do deliberately risk collapsing the US or global economy after several years of organising - yeah I think the US federal government would sooner make that RICO filing then give u/hoplias literally billions of dollars for his shares in GameStop.[=GameStop=]."''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''Dan:''' ''[[VomitDiscretionShot [vomits into a bag]]]''\\

to:

'''Dan:''' ''[[VomitDiscretionShot [vomits ''[[[VomitDiscretionShot vomits into a bag]]]''\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Updating Link


* {{Flanderization}}: In his character analysis of [[Franchise/TheSimpsons Homer Simpson]], he talks about how Homer inverted the StandardFiftiesFather archetype. Homer became more unsympathetic, but still likable, which led to later live-action sitcoms featuring {{BumblingDad}}s in imitation of him. The writers of ''The Simpsons'' then satirized the {{Unsympathetic Comedy Protagonist}}s they helped create by making him even more unsympathetic.

to:

* {{Flanderization}}: In his character analysis of [[Franchise/TheSimpsons [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Homer Simpson]], he talks about how Homer inverted the StandardFiftiesFather archetype. Homer became more unsympathetic, but still likable, which led to later live-action sitcoms featuring {{BumblingDad}}s in imitation of him. The writers of ''The Simpsons'' then satirized the {{Unsympathetic Comedy Protagonist}}s they helped create by making him even more unsympathetic.

Added: 395

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In ''This is Financial Advice'', he raises the point that the Apes' plan is clearly not fully thought through. If MOASS starts looking like it could be happening, then Apes would have collectively conspired to crash the global economy, which would be getting them in trouble with the government way before they see any of the actual earnings promised.

to:

** In ''This is Financial Advice'', he raises the point that the Apes' plan is clearly not fully thought through. If MOASS starts looking like it could be happening, then Apes would have collectively conspired to crash the global economy, which would be getting them in trouble with the government way before they see any of the actual earnings promised.promised:
-->''"The US government wrote off the GME squeeze as a one-off viral event and let everyone off the hook, but if the Apes get their wish and really do deliberately risk collapsing the US or global economy after several years of organising - yeah I think the US federal government would sooner make that RICO filing then give u/hoplias literally billions of dollars for his shares in GameStop."''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AssholeVictim: Refuted in ''This is Financial Advice''. He admits that the Apes don't seem like good people and lists reasons why so (they're conspiratorially minded to the point of verging into antisemitism, they're planning to crash the global economy with no thought about what will be the damages normal people might suffer, and regularly confess to lying to their spouses and families about the state of their shared finances due to a gambling addiction), that being said, he argues that nobody deserves to be so grifted and brainwashed that the only way forward is to become a grifter themselves.

to:

* AssholeVictim: Refuted Defied in ''This is Financial Advice''. He admits that the Apes don't seem like good people and lists reasons why so (they're conspiratorially minded to the point of verging into antisemitism, they're planning to crash the global economy with no thought about what will be the damages normal people might suffer, and regularly confess to lying to their spouses and families about the state of their shared finances due to a gambling addiction), that being said, he argues that nobody deserves to be so grifted and brainwashed that the only way forward is to become a grifter themselves.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Sink Hole, also doesn't actually match the trope definition.


** His "This is Financial Advice" video has him retroactively apply this to crypto enthusiasts compared to "Apes". While cryptocurrency enthusiasts will twist themselves into knots trying to explain why a company failing is [[FailureGambit actually a good thing]] (usually, that it [[AdaptiveAbility strengthens the industry as a whole]]), they will at least acknowledge that the company ''is'' going bankrupt, whereas Apes will continue to insist that the company or its stock will rebound any moment now.

to:

** His "This is Financial Advice" video has him retroactively apply this to crypto enthusiasts compared to "Apes". While cryptocurrency enthusiasts will twist themselves into knots trying to explain why a company failing is [[FailureGambit actually a good thing]] (usually, that it [[AdaptiveAbility strengthens the industry as a whole]]), whole), they will at least acknowledge that the company ''is'' going bankrupt, whereas Apes will continue to insist that the company or its stock will rebound any moment now.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** His "This is Financial Advice" video has him retroactively apply this to crypto enthusiasts compared to "Apes". While cryptocurrency enthusiasts will twist themselves into knots trying to explain why a company failing is [[FailureGambit actually a good thing]], they will at least acknowledge that the company ''is'' going bankrupt, whereas Apes will continue to insist that the company or its stock will rebound any moment now.

to:

** His "This is Financial Advice" video has him retroactively apply this to crypto enthusiasts compared to "Apes". While cryptocurrency enthusiasts will twist themselves into knots trying to explain why a company failing is [[FailureGambit actually a good thing]], thing]] (usually, that it [[AdaptiveAbility strengthens the industry as a whole]]), they will at least acknowledge that the company ''is'' going bankrupt, whereas Apes will continue to insist that the company or its stock will rebound any moment now.

Top