Follow TV Tropes

Following

History UsefulNotes / AmericanPoliticalSystem

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
explanation of red v blue meme


Also, note the unofficial colors of the two parties. In most of the Western world, the color red is used for left-wing parties (red having traditionally been the color of socialism), while blue was given to right-wing parties. In America, however, this is reversed -- the center-left (by American standards) Democrats have blue as their color, while the center-right Republicans are red. The terms "red states" and "blue states" stem from this dichotomy. This is [[NewerThanTheyThink a surprisingly recent development]] that dates back to the 2000 election, when the major networks all used these colors to represent each party. Other colors had been used before (including red for the Dems and blue for the GOP in 1996), but the long, drawn-out 2000 election cemented the red-vs-blue meme in the public consciousness. This sometimes creates confusion for Canadians and Europeans, who wonder why the Americans just don't do things the way the rest of the world does them (just like how they wonder why America uses [[AmericanCustomaryMeasurements a completely different system of weights and measures from every other country on Earth]]). The truth is that the Democrats were not formed as part of the Labor Movement of the 1800s to early 1900s from which most red-colored center-left parties got their start, and thus it wouldn't really be appropriate to demand they use red since they ''became'' a center-left party rather than were founded as one.

to:

Also, note the unofficial colors of the two parties. In most of the Western world, the color red is used for left-wing parties (red having traditionally been the color of socialism), while blue was given to right-wing parties. In America, however, this is reversed -- the center-left (by American standards) Democrats have blue as their color, while the center-right Republicans are red. The terms "red states" and "blue states" stem from this dichotomy. This is [[NewerThanTheyThink a surprisingly recent development]] that dates back to the 2000 election, when the major networks all used these colors to represent each party. Other colors had been used before (including The tradition until that point was that blue represented the party of the incumbent President and red represented the challenger (which meant red for the Dems and blue for the GOP in 1996), during Bill Clinton's 1996 reelection), but the long, drawn-out 2000 election cemented the red-vs-blue meme in the public consciousness. This sometimes creates confusion for Canadians and Europeans, who wonder why the Americans just don't do things the way the rest of the world does them (just like how they wonder why America uses [[AmericanCustomaryMeasurements a completely different system of weights and measures from every other country on Earth]]). The truth is that the Democrats were not formed as part of the Labor Movement of the 1800s to early 1900s from which most red-colored center-left parties got their start, and thus it wouldn't really be appropriate to demand they use red since they ''became'' a center-left party rather than were founded as one.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No provision allows alteration or removal of content from Constitution


While the Constitution is not set in stone -- to date there are 27 amendments, the first ten of which are referred to as the Bill of Rights, and while the reasons are complicated, were planned to be put in the constitution before it was ratified. This gives you an idea of how hard the amendment process is -- 27 amendments (the first ten of which were done as a set, and one of which is in there to repeal an earlier one, so effectively only 16) over 220 years is pretty good.

to:

While the Constitution is not set in stone -- to date there are 27 amendments, the first ten of which are referred to as the Bill of Rights, and while the reasons are complicated, were planned to be put in the constitution before it was ratified. This gives you an idea of how hard the amendment process is -- 27 amendments (the first ten of which were done as a set, and one of which is in there to repeal an earlier one, so effectively only 16) over 220 years is pretty good.
good. Also noteworthy is that there is no provision to edit or remove content from the Constitution; only additions are allowed. The 18th Amendment was explicitly repealed by the 21st Amendment, yet the 18th was not and cannot be stricken from the document.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->''Ninety-eight percent of the adults in this country are decent, hard-working, honest Americans. It's the other lousy two percent that get all the publicity. But then, we elected them.''

to:

->''Ninety-eight percent of the adults in this country are decent, hard-working, honest Americans. It's the other lousy two percent that [[VocalMinority get all the publicity.publicity]]. But then, we elected them.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


While the Constitution is not set in stone -- to date there are 27 amendments, the first ten of which are referred to as the Bill of Rights, and while the reasons are complicated, were planned to be put in the constitution before it was ratified. This gives you an idea of how hard the amendment process is -- 17 amendments (one of which is in there to repeal an earlier one, so effectively only 15 and the first 10 were done as a set, bringing it down to 6) over 220 years is pretty good.

to:

While the Constitution is not set in stone -- to date there are 27 amendments, the first ten of which are referred to as the Bill of Rights, and while the reasons are complicated, were planned to be put in the constitution before it was ratified. This gives you an idea of how hard the amendment process is -- 17 27 amendments (one (the first ten of which were done as a set, and one of which is in there to repeal an earlier one, so effectively only 15 and the first 10 were done as a set, bringing it down to 6) 16) over 220 years is pretty good.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_USA Communist Party USA]]''' was influential from the 1920s to 1040s and was crushed by the RedScare.

to:

* '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_USA Communist Party USA]]''' was influential from the 1920s to 1040s 1940s and was crushed by the RedScare.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_Party_(United_States) Constitution Party]]''' is the third largest political party according to [[http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/120108.html Ballot Access News]] as of 2008. They are an ultra-conservative party which favors states' rights, ending the income tax and "unconstitutional spending", isolationism, protectionist/mercantilist trade policies, gun rights, strong opposition to immigration, a generally fundamentalist Christian stance on most social and cultural issues (although there is a small secular bloc within the party), repeal of the Patriot Act, and withdrawal from the UnitedNations and free trade agreements. They have a great deal of credibility among [[RightWingMilitiaFanatic far-right]] {{conspiracy theorist}} crowds, as evidenced when their last Presidential candidate (who, not coincidentally, was endorsed by prominent conspiracy radio host Alex Jones) implied that he believed 9/11 to have been a FalseFlagOperation, and openly stated that he believed that JFK's assassination [[WhoShotJFK was a conspiracy]]. Since the election of BarackObama, the aims of the Constitution Party and those of the Republican party have become increasingly indistinguishable.

to:

* The '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_Party_(United_States) Constitution Party]]''' is the third largest political party according to [[http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/120108.html Ballot Access News]] as of 2008. They are an ultra-conservative party which favors states' rights, ending the income tax and "unconstitutional spending", isolationism, protectionist/mercantilist trade policies, gun rights, strong opposition to immigration, a generally fundamentalist Christian stance on most social and cultural issues (although there is a small secular bloc within the party), repeal of the Patriot Act, and withdrawal from the UnitedNations and free trade agreements. They have a great deal of credibility among [[RightWingMilitiaFanatic far-right]] {{conspiracy theorist}} crowds, as evidenced when their last Presidential candidate (who, not coincidentally, was endorsed by prominent conspiracy radio host Alex Jones) implied that he believed 9/11 to have been a FalseFlagOperation, and openly stated that he believed that JFK's assassination [[WhoShotJFK was a conspiracy]]. Since the election of BarackObama, the aims of the Constitution Party and those of certain elements of the Republican party have become increasingly indistinguishable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The vice president, in contrast, has little authority and more often functions as a government spokesman. He (no woman has ever been elected, although twice the losing candidate has picked a woman as his running mate), has the cushiest job in the world because he has ''absolutely nothing to do'' unless one of two things fails, thus he has only two official jobs. The first is basically to sit around and wait for the President of the United States to drop dead, and the second is to act as President of the Senate with nothing to do and no right to vote, except cast a tie-breaking vote if there is a deadlock.

to:

The vice president, in contrast, has little authority and more often functions as a government spokesman. He (no woman has ever been elected, although twice the losing candidate has picked a woman as his running mate), mate) has the cushiest job in the world because he has ''absolutely nothing to do'' unless one of two things fails, thus he has only two official jobs. The first is basically to sit around and wait for the President of the United States to drop dead, and the second is to act as President of the Senate with nothing to do and no right to vote, except cast a tie-breaking vote if there is a deadlock.

Changed: 287

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The US is a republic, a nation that is not a monarchy, with some (i.e., the election of the members of the House of Representatives and President, as well as senators post 17th amendment.) functions determined by voting. While the distinction may sound like InsistentTerminology, it is needed to prevent confusion with "true" democracy, which the founders believed true democracy was a bad idea (for example, ThomasJefferson claimed "''A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.''").

to:

Since the United States is a republic, you will occasionally find people trying to tell you that the United States "is not a democracy.". The US is a republic, a nation that is not a monarchy, with some (i.e., the election of the members of the House of Representatives and President, as well as senators post 17th amendment.) functions determined by voting. While the distinction may sound like InsistentTerminology, it is needed to prevent confusion with "true" democracy, which the The founders believed true thought direct democracy was a bad idea (for idea, for example, ThomasJefferson claimed "''A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.''").
''"

Changed: 33

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Unlike many other nations, the US has a single written constitution, ratified in 1789, which is referred to simply as "the Constitution". The Constitution is "the supreme law of the land" under US law, and all other statutes and acts of government must defer to it or be rendered null and void. The thesis of the thing is that Americans have the right and responsibility to kick the government directly in the [[strike:ass]] [[GroinAttack balls]] if it gets too uppity. A beautiful thing.

to:

Unlike many other nations, the US has a single written constitution, ratified in 1789, which is referred to simply as "the Constitution". The Constitution is "the supreme law of the land" under US law, and all other statutes and acts of government must defer to it or be rendered null and void. The thesis of the thing is that Americans have the right and responsibility to kick the government directly in the [[strike:ass]] [[GroinAttack balls]] ass if it gets too uppity. A beautiful thing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


While the Constitution is not set in stone -- to date there are 27 amendments, the first ten of which are referred to as the Bill of Rights, and while the reasons are complicated, were planned to be put in the constitution before it was ratified. This gives you an idea of how hard the amendment process is -- 17 amendments (one of which is in there to repeal an earlier one, so effectively only 15) over 220 years is pretty good.

to:

While the Constitution is not set in stone -- to date there are 27 amendments, the first ten of which are referred to as the Bill of Rights, and while the reasons are complicated, were planned to be put in the constitution before it was ratified. This gives you an idea of how hard the amendment process is -- 17 amendments (one of which is in there to repeal an earlier one, so effectively only 15) 15 and the first 10 were done as a set, bringing it down to 6) over 220 years is pretty good.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Unlike many other nations, the US has a single written constitution, ratified in 1789, which is referred to simply as "the Constitution". The Constitution is "the supreme law of the land" under US law, and all other statutes and acts of government must defer to it or be rendered null and void. The thesis of the thing is that Americans have the right and responsibility to kick the government directly in the ass if it gets too uppity. A beautiful thing.

to:

Unlike many other nations, the US has a single written constitution, ratified in 1789, which is referred to simply as "the Constitution". The Constitution is "the supreme law of the land" under US law, and all other statutes and acts of government must defer to it or be rendered null and void. The thesis of the thing is that Americans have the right and responsibility to kick the government directly in the ass [[strike:ass]] [[GroinAttack balls]] if it gets too uppity. A beautiful thing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Since the United States is a republic, you will occasionally find people trying to tell you that the United States "is not a democracy.". The US is a republic, a nation that is not a monarchy, with some (i.e., the election of the members of the House of Representatives and President, as well as senators post 17th amendment.) functions determined by voting. The founders thought direct democracy was a bad idea, for example, ThomasJefferson claimed "''A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.''"

to:

Since the United States is a republic, you will occasionally find people trying to tell you that the United States "is not a democracy.". The US is a republic, a nation that is not a monarchy, with some (i.e., the election of the members of the House of Representatives and President, as well as senators post 17th amendment.) functions determined by voting. The While the distinction may sound like InsistentTerminology, it is needed to prevent confusion with "true" democracy, which the founders thought direct believed true democracy was a bad idea, for idea (for example, ThomasJefferson claimed "''A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.''"
''").
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Since the United States is a republic, you will occasionally find people trying to tell you that the United States "is not a democracy." This assumes that a "democracy" only means a direct democracy, and that a representative republic is not a democracy. The US is a republic, a nation that is not a monarchy, where at least some of the population has a say in the affairs of state. The founders thought direct democracy was a bad idea, for example, ThomasJefferson claimed "''A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.''"

to:

Since the United States is a republic, you will occasionally find people trying to tell you that the United States "is not a democracy." This assumes that a "democracy" only means a direct democracy, and that a representative republic is not a democracy. ". The US is a republic, a nation that is not a monarchy, where at least with some (i.e., the election of the population has a say in members of the affairs House of state.Representatives and President, as well as senators post 17th amendment.) functions determined by voting. The founders thought direct democracy was a bad idea, for example, ThomasJefferson claimed "''A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.''"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Please don't do the rhetoric here. You could report the rhetoric, but doing it is not what we want.


In the current Congress (2009-2010 session), both houses of Congress have a Democratic majority. As the executive and legislative branches are distinct in the US government, it is possible for one or both houses of Congress to be controlled by the opposite party than the president, and indeed this is more often than not the case -- Democrat BillClinton had a Republican congress for six years of his presidency, and GeorgeWBush worked with a Democratic Congress for the final two years of his term. While such differences can often lead to a political stalemate -- a budgetary standoff between Clinton and Republican Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich lead to a federal government shutdown in 1995 -- more often than not, compromise rules the day although unprecedented Republican abuse of the filibuster rule during Barack Obama's term has served to give the minority party an effective veto, earned them the nickname "Party Of No" (due to an utter unwillingness to compromise) and revived serious discussion about doing away with the filibuster entirely.

to:

In the current Congress (2009-2010 session), both houses of Congress have a Democratic majority. As the executive and legislative branches are distinct in the US government, it is possible for one or both houses of Congress to be controlled by the opposite party than the president, and indeed this is more often than not the case -- Democrat BillClinton had a Republican congress for six years of his presidency, and GeorgeWBush worked with a Democratic Congress for the final two years of his term. While such differences can often lead to a political stalemate -- a budgetary standoff between Clinton and Republican Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich lead to a federal government shutdown in 1995 -- more often than not, compromise rules the day although unprecedented day. Republican abuse use of the filibuster rule during Barack Obama's term has served to give the minority party an effective veto, earned them the nickname "Party Of No" (due to an utter unwillingness to compromise) and revived serious discussion about doing away with the filibuster entirely.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In the current Congress (2009-2010 session), both houses of Congress have a Democratic majority. As the executive and legislative branches are distinct in the US government, it is possible for one or both houses of Congress to be controlled by the opposite party than the president, and indeed this is more often than not the case -- Democrat BillClinton had a Republican congress for six years of his presidency, and GeorgeWBush worked with a Democratic Congress for the final two years of his term. While such differences can often lead to a political stalemate -- a budgetary standoff between Clinton and Republican Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich lead to a federal government shutdown in 1995 -- more often than not, compromise rules the day.

to:

In the current Congress (2009-2010 session), both houses of Congress have a Democratic majority. As the executive and legislative branches are distinct in the US government, it is possible for one or both houses of Congress to be controlled by the opposite party than the president, and indeed this is more often than not the case -- Democrat BillClinton had a Republican congress for six years of his presidency, and GeorgeWBush worked with a Democratic Congress for the final two years of his term. While such differences can often lead to a political stalemate -- a budgetary standoff between Clinton and Republican Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich lead to a federal government shutdown in 1995 -- more often than not, compromise rules the day.
day although unprecedented Republican abuse of the filibuster rule during Barack Obama's term has served to give the minority party an effective veto, earned them the nickname "Party Of No" (due to an utter unwillingness to compromise) and revived serious discussion about doing away with the filibuster entirely.

Added: 285

Changed: 319

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The only two presidents that have actually been challenged in any way under these terms of eligibility to date are BarackObama and ChesterAArthur. Challenges to Obama claim that he was actually born in Kenya, and that his Hawaiian birth certificate (and newspaper announcement) were careful forgeries--never mind that his mother being born and raised in the US still makes him a citizen by birth, and thus by no means ineligible to be President. Those who subscribe to this [[strike:unusual]] lunatic, categorically untrue theory also claim that his mother could not have transmitted citizenship to him because she was too young to have lived in the U.S. the requisite number of years. This is only true if you accept that she spent more than eight months in Kenya (as she gave birth a little over eight months after her 18th birthday), but there's no evidence she ever went there to begin with; nevertheless, this particular [[strike:supposition]] lie has never been tested in a court of law, and probably won't be any time soon. Chester Arthur was accused by a man named Arthur Hinman of being born in Ireland (he had an Irish father) then brought to the US, but no one took up that story, so he then accused that Chet was born in Canada. He was allegedly born in Fairfield, Vermont, extremely close to the border.

to:

The only two presidents that have actually been challenged in any way under these terms of eligibility to date are BarackObama and ChesterAArthur. Challenges to Obama claim that he was actually born in Kenya, and that his Hawaiian birth certificate (and newspaper announcement) were careful forgeries--never mind that his mother being born and raised in the US still makes him a citizen by birth, and thus by no means ineligible to be President. Those who subscribe to this [[strike:unusual]] lunatic, unusual, categorically untrue theory also claim that his mother could not have transmitted citizenship to him because she was too young to have lived in the U.S. the requisite number of years. This is only true if you accept that she spent more than eight months in Kenya (as she gave birth a little over eight months after her 18th birthday), but there's no evidence she ever went there to begin with; nevertheless, this particular [[strike:supposition]] lie supposition has never been tested in a court of law, and probably won't be any time soon. soon.

Chester Arthur was accused by a man named Arthur Hinman of being born in Ireland (he had an Irish father) then brought to the US, but no one took up that story, so he then accused that Chet was born in Canada. He was allegedly born in Fairfield, Vermont, extremely close to the border.

Changed: 161

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Sigh. Another axe grinder.


* The '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_Party_(United_States) Libertarian Party]]''' is pretty much ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin: it aims to be the leading party for libertarianism. Libertarians tend to favor maximum individual liberty (pro-gun rights, pro-gay rights, pro-drug legalization, pro-legal abortion, anti-Patriot Act), maximum economic liberty (loose environmental and worker safety laws, pro-free trade, anti-tax, anti-bailout), and very limited government involvement in social welfare. They oppose the Iraq War and believe in a non-interventionist foreign policy, feeling that the military should only be used for the purpose of defending the United States. Libertarians do not identify themselves as "left" or "right" in the traditional sense -- most would argue for a bi-axial system of political identification, with "conservative" and "liberal" on the economic axis and "libertarian" and "authoritarian" on the social axis. Their policies can be pretty much summed up as business having the freedom to do anything it likes and everyone else having the freedom to starve under a bridge.

to:

* The '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_Party_(United_States) Libertarian Party]]''' is pretty much ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin: it aims to be the leading party for libertarianism. Libertarians tend to favor maximum individual liberty (pro-gun rights, pro-gay rights, pro-drug legalization, pro-legal abortion, anti-Patriot Act), maximum economic liberty (loose environmental and worker safety laws, pro-free trade, anti-tax, anti-bailout), and very limited government involvement in social welfare. They oppose the Iraq War and believe in a non-interventionist foreign policy, feeling that the military should only be used for the purpose of defending the United States. Libertarians do not identify themselves as "left" or "right" in the traditional sense -- most would argue for a bi-axial system of political identification, with "conservative" and "liberal" on the economic axis and "libertarian" and "authoritarian" on the social axis. Their policies can be pretty much summed up as business having the freedom to do anything it likes and everyone else having the freedom to starve under a bridge.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_Party_(United_States) Libertarian Party]]''' is pretty much ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin: it aims to be the leading party for libertarianism. Libertarians tend to favor maximum individual liberty (pro-gun rights, pro-gay rights, pro-drug legalization, pro-legal abortion, anti-Patriot Act), maximum economic liberty (loose environmental and worker safety laws, pro-free trade, anti-tax, anti-bailout), and very limited government involvement in social welfare. They oppose the Iraq War and believe in a non-interventionist foreign policy, feeling that the military should only be used for the purpose of defending the United States. Libertarians do not identify themselves as "left" or "right" in the traditional sense -- most would argue for a bi-axial system of political identification, with "conservative" and "liberal" on the economic axis and "libertarian" and "authoritarian" on the social axis.

to:

* The '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_Party_(United_States) Libertarian Party]]''' is pretty much ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin: it aims to be the leading party for libertarianism. Libertarians tend to favor maximum individual liberty (pro-gun rights, pro-gay rights, pro-drug legalization, pro-legal abortion, anti-Patriot Act), maximum economic liberty (loose environmental and worker safety laws, pro-free trade, anti-tax, anti-bailout), and very limited government involvement in social welfare. They oppose the Iraq War and believe in a non-interventionist foreign policy, feeling that the military should only be used for the purpose of defending the United States. Libertarians do not identify themselves as "left" or "right" in the traditional sense -- most would argue for a bi-axial system of political identification, with "conservative" and "liberal" on the economic axis and "libertarian" and "authoritarian" on the social axis. Their policies can be pretty much summed up as business having the freedom to do anything it likes and everyone else having the freedom to starve under a bridge.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The only two presidents that have actually been challenged in any way under these terms of eligibility to date are BarackObama and ChesterAArthur. Challenges to Obama claim that he was actually born in Kenya, and that his Hawaiian birth certificate (and newspaper announcement) were careful forgeries--never mind that his mother being born and raised in the US still makes him a citizen by birth, and thus by no means ineligible to be President. Those who subscribe to this [[strike:unusual]] lunatic, categorically untrue theory also claim that his mother could not have transmitted citizenship to him because she was too young to have lived in the U.S. the requisite number of years. This is only true if you accept that she spent more than eight months in Kenya (as she gave birth a little over eight months after her 18th birthday), but there's no evidence she ever went there to begin with; nevertheless, this particular supposition has never been tested in a court of law, and probably won't be any time soon. Chester Arthur was accused by a man named Arthur Hinman of being born in Ireland (he had an Irish father) then brought to the US, but no one took up that story, so he then accused that Chet was born in Canada. He was allegedly born in Fairfield, Vermont, extremely close to the border.

to:

The only two presidents that have actually been challenged in any way under these terms of eligibility to date are BarackObama and ChesterAArthur. Challenges to Obama claim that he was actually born in Kenya, and that his Hawaiian birth certificate (and newspaper announcement) were careful forgeries--never mind that his mother being born and raised in the US still makes him a citizen by birth, and thus by no means ineligible to be President. Those who subscribe to this [[strike:unusual]] lunatic, categorically untrue theory also claim that his mother could not have transmitted citizenship to him because she was too young to have lived in the U.S. the requisite number of years. This is only true if you accept that she spent more than eight months in Kenya (as she gave birth a little over eight months after her 18th birthday), but there's no evidence she ever went there to begin with; nevertheless, this particular supposition [[strike:supposition]] lie has never been tested in a court of law, and probably won't be any time soon. Chester Arthur was accused by a man named Arthur Hinman of being born in Ireland (he had an Irish father) then brought to the US, but no one took up that story, so he then accused that Chet was born in Canada. He was allegedly born in Fairfield, Vermont, extremely close to the border.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The only two presidents that have actually been challenged in any way under these terms of eligibility to date are BarackObama and ChesterAArthur. Challenges to Obama claim that he was actually born in Kenya, and that his Hawaiian birth certificate (and newspaper announcement) were careful forgeries--never mind that his mother being born and raised in the US still makes him a citizen by birth, and thus by no means ineligible to be President. Those who subscribe to this unusual theory also claim that his mother could not have transmitted citizenship to him because she was too young to have lived in the U.S. the requisite number of years. This is only true if you accept that she spent more than eight months in Kenya (as she gave birth a little over eight months after her 18th birthday), but there's no evidence she ever went there to begin with; nevertheless, this particular supposition has never been tested in a court of law, and probably won't be any time soon. Chester Arthur was accused by a man named Arthur Hinman of being born in Ireland (he had an Irish father) then brought to the US, but no one took up that story, so he then accused that Chet was born in Canada. He was allegedly born in Fairfield, Vermont, extremely close to the border.

to:

The only two presidents that have actually been challenged in any way under these terms of eligibility to date are BarackObama and ChesterAArthur. Challenges to Obama claim that he was actually born in Kenya, and that his Hawaiian birth certificate (and newspaper announcement) were careful forgeries--never mind that his mother being born and raised in the US still makes him a citizen by birth, and thus by no means ineligible to be President. Those who subscribe to this unusual [[strike:unusual]] lunatic, categorically untrue theory also claim that his mother could not have transmitted citizenship to him because she was too young to have lived in the U.S. the requisite number of years. This is only true if you accept that she spent more than eight months in Kenya (as she gave birth a little over eight months after her 18th birthday), but there's no evidence she ever went there to begin with; nevertheless, this particular supposition has never been tested in a court of law, and probably won't be any time soon. Chester Arthur was accused by a man named Arthur Hinman of being born in Ireland (he had an Irish father) then brought to the US, but no one took up that story, so he then accused that Chet was born in Canada. He was allegedly born in Fairfield, Vermont, extremely close to the border.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Each state boasts a number of electors equal to its Congressional representation: two senators plus however many representatives. When the College meets, about one month after the actual election, each state's electors vote for the presidential candidates; each state is allowed to set their own laws for how the electors vote, but in recent years 48 states have granted all their votes to whomever received the majority of popular votes in their state. [[hottip:*:The two exceptions are Nebraska and Maine, who instead allocate their congressional electors based on how the congressional districts vote individually - which resulted in Nebraska's 2nd Congressional District (comprised of the Omaha metro area) elector going blue in 2008 while the rest of the state's electors went red.]]

to:

Each state boasts a number of electors equal to its Congressional representation: two senators plus however many representatives. When the College meets, about one month after the actual election, each state's electors vote for the presidential candidates; each state is allowed to set their own laws for how the electors vote, but in recent years 48 states have granted all their votes to whomever received the majority [[strike:majority]] largest number of popular votes in their state.state (meaning not necessarily the majority as in 50%, but a greater number than anyone else recieved). [[hottip:*:The two exceptions are Nebraska and Maine, who instead allocate their congressional electors based on how the congressional districts vote individually - which resulted in Nebraska's 2nd Congressional District (comprised of the Omaha metro area) elector going blue in 2008 while the rest of the state's electors went red.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition_Party Prohibition Party]]''' was founded in 1869 to call for the restriction and prohibition of alcoholic substances. It had its greatest success in 1919, when national alcohol prohibition was enacted, causing it to change its message to calling for stricter enforcement of the ban. However, the growing distaste for prohibition cost them dearly, and the repeal of prohibition in 1933 set the party on a long decline. The party still exists, but in the last election, it only earned 643 votes -- a far cry from the days when they could win over a quarter of a million votes. By sheer twist of fate, they were responsible for the election of the first female mayor in American history, and did so completely by accident. For fun, take a look on their [[Wikipedia Other Wiki]] page and see where they held their conventions. Going down the list, it's kind of sad.

to:

* The '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition_Party Prohibition Party]]''' was founded in 1869 to call for the restriction and prohibition of alcoholic substances. It had its greatest success in 1919, when national alcohol prohibition was enacted, causing it to change its message to calling for stricter enforcement of the ban. However, the growing distaste for prohibition cost them dearly, and the repeal of prohibition in 1933 set the party on a long decline. The party still exists, but in the last election, it only earned 643 votes -- a far cry from the days when they could win over a quarter of a million votes. By sheer twist of fate, they were responsible for the election of the first female mayor in American history, and did so completely by accident. For fun, take a look on their [[Wikipedia Other Wiki]] [[TheOtherWiki Wikipedia]] page and see where they held their conventions. Going down the list, it's kind of sad.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*'''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_USA Communist Party USA]]''' was influential from the 1920s to 1040s and was crushed by the RedScare.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


As a general rule, winning a primary requires PanderingToTheBase, while winning a general election requires appealing to centrist "swing voters". Expect accusations of "flip-flopping," particularly from an incumbent opponent who has the luxury of sitting out the primary (it's considered a VeryBadSign of a politician's career if he faces a primary challenge as an incumbent).

to:

As a general rule, winning a primary requires PanderingToTheBase, while winning a general election requires appealing to centrist "swing voters". Expect accusations of "flip-flopping," particularly from an incumbent opponent who has the luxury of sitting out the primary (it's considered a VeryBadSign bad sign of a politician's career if he faces a primary challenge as an incumbent).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Seeing as Byrd's kinda dead, it's a little difficult for him to be Pres Pro Tem :P


Only two presidents have ever been impeached - Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton - and both escaped conviction. Richard Nixon would have been impeached, but resigned first. The Senate is chaired either by the Vice President or by the '''President Pro Tempore''', the most senior senator of the entire Senate, regardless of party affiliation. However, because President Pro Tems are, well, ''old'', they don't always have the constitution to preside over long, grueling hours of debate. Informally, the reins of power are wielded by the "Majority Leader" - ie, the senator who chairs the majority party's caucus. The current President Pro Tempore is Robert Byrd, Democrat from West Virginia, and the current majority leader is Harry Reid, of the same party, who represents Nevada.

to:

Only two presidents have ever been impeached - Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton - and both escaped conviction. Richard Nixon would have been impeached, but resigned first. The Senate is chaired either by the Vice President or by the '''President Pro Tempore''', the most senior senator of the entire Senate, regardless of party affiliation. However, because President Pro Tems are, well, ''old'', they don't always have the constitution to preside over long, grueling hours of debate. Informally, the reins of power are wielded by the "Majority Leader" - ie, the senator who chairs the majority party's caucus. The current President Pro Tempore is Robert Byrd, Daniel Inouye, Democrat from West Virginia, Hawaii, and the current majority leader is Harry Reid, of the same party, who represents Nevada.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Know_Nothing Know Nothings]]''' were a political party that existed under the names '''Native American Party''' from 1845 to 1855, and the '''American Party''' from then until 1860. The Know Nothings were a nativist movement that was strongly opposed to immigration (particularly from Ireland and Germany), which they blamed for the crime in the cities, and Catholicism, which they felt was a foreign plot to subvert and overthrow American democracy. The name "Know Nothing" comes from the secret groups that preceded the party, whose members were told to say "I know nothing" if they were confronted about their involvement. They enjoyed massive success in the mid-1850s thanks to the collapse of the Whig Party and the two-party system, but they soon splintered and fell apart over the issue of slavery. The term "Know Nothing" would go on to be used as a derogatory term for a nativist for decades to come.

to:

* The '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Know_Nothing Know Nothings]]''' were a political party that existed under the names '''Native American Party''' (nothing to do with actual Native Americans) from 1845 to 1855, and the '''American Party''' from then until 1860. The Know Nothings were a nativist movement that was strongly opposed to immigration (particularly from Ireland and Germany), which they blamed for the crime in the cities, and Catholicism, which they felt was a foreign plot to subvert and overthrow American democracy. The name "Know Nothing" comes from the secret groups that preceded the party, whose members were told to say "I know nothing" if they were confronted about their involvement. They enjoyed massive success in the mid-1850s thanks to the collapse of the Whig Party and the two-party system, but they soon splintered and fell apart over the issue of slavery. The term "Know Nothing" would go on to be used as a derogatory term for a nativist for decades to come.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This can (and frequently does) lead to a practice called "gerrymandering" where the party in charge draws up ridiculously-shaped districts so as to secure as many safe districts for themselves while splitting up the other party's strongholds across multiple districts. Gerrymandering is legal, believe it or not; both parties squawk about reform, but neither is willing to be the first one to give up its precious ''safe seats''. The name, incidentally, goes right back to the beginnings of the Republic, first appearing around 1812 and taking its name from Massachusetts governor Elbridge Gerry. The practice might have started even earlier.

to:

This can (and frequently does) lead to a practice called "gerrymandering" where the party in charge draws up [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IL04_109.gif ridiculously-shaped districts districts]] so as to secure as many safe districts for themselves while splitting up the other party's strongholds across multiple districts. Gerrymandering is legal, believe it or not; both parties squawk about reform, but neither is willing to be the first one to give up its precious ''safe seats''. The name, incidentally, goes right back to the beginnings of the Republic, first appearing around 1812 and taking its name from Massachusetts governor Elbridge Gerry. The practice might have started even earlier.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The Constitution itself lets Congress decide what happens if both POTUS and VPOTUS ([[FunWithAcronyms (Vice) President of the United States]]) are gone. Currently, this falls under the Presidential Succession Act of 1947. It goes from President, to Vice President, to Speaker of the House, to President ''pro tempore'' of the Senate, to the Cabinet members in order of the Cabinet post's longevity. Since the US hasn't gone past 'vice president' yet on the list, the fact that it ends at the Cabinet hasn't been tested. As an extra extra extra precaution, the Secret Service designates one member of the line of succession the "Designated Survivor" to stay behind at any event where the entire line will be in together. It's a precaution in case the event is attacked and the entire line is wiped out; at least there will be a LastManStanding to assume the Presidency and lead the counter assault (fiction loves this fact). The President pro tempore of the Senate in the line of succession was considered a serious problem in the late 1990s when the extremely elderly Strom Thurmond held the position- today it's held by Robert Byrd, who is 92 and has spent 51 years in the Senate.

to:

The Constitution itself lets Congress decide what happens if both POTUS and VPOTUS ([[FunWithAcronyms (Vice) President of the United States]]) are gone. Currently, this falls under the Presidential Succession Act of 1947. It goes from President, to Vice President, to Speaker of the House, to President ''pro tempore'' of the Senate, to the Cabinet members in order of the Cabinet post's longevity. Since the US hasn't gone past 'vice president' yet on the list, the fact that it ends at the Cabinet hasn't been tested. As an extra extra extra precaution, the Secret Service designates one member of the line of succession the "Designated Survivor" to stay behind at any event where the entire line will be in together. It's a precaution in case the event is attacked and the entire line is wiped out; at least there will be a LastManStanding to assume the Presidency and lead the counter assault (fiction loves this fact). The President pro tempore of the Senate in the line of succession was considered a serious problem in the late 1990s when the extremely elderly Strom Thurmond held the position- today it's held by Robert Byrd, Daniel Inouye, who is 92 and has spent 51 years in the Senate.
been representing Hawaii as long as it's been a state.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


While the Constitution is not set in stone -- to date there are 27 amendments, the first ten of which are referred to as the Bill of Rights, and while the reasons are complicated, were planned to be put in the constitution before it was ratified. This gives you an idea of how hard the amendment process is -- 17 amendments (two of which are in there to repeal earlier ones) over 220 years is pretty good.

to:

While the Constitution is not set in stone -- to date there are 27 amendments, the first ten of which are referred to as the Bill of Rights, and while the reasons are complicated, were planned to be put in the constitution before it was ratified. This gives you an idea of how hard the amendment process is -- 17 amendments (two (one of which are is in there to repeal an earlier ones) one, so effectively only 15) over 220 years is pretty good.

Added: 70731

Changed: 318

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moved from Main


Click the edit button to start this new page.

to:

Click ->''We the edit button people of the United States, in order to start form a more perfect Union, establish justice, ensure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty for ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.''
-->-'''U.S. Constitution''', Preamble

->''Ninety-eight percent of the adults in this country are decent, hard-working, honest Americans. It's the other lousy two percent that get all the publicity. But then, we elected them.''
-->-'''Lily Tomlin'''

The United States is a [[AmericanFederalism federal]] republic consisting principally of [[TheSeveralStates 50 states]] and the District of Columbia (which is made up entirely of one city, WashingtonDC; it's often called simply "DC" in common usage), the seat of the federal government.

Note that distinction: DC is ''in'' the United States, but not ''of'' them. Lots of {{hilarity ensues}} from that fact, including the oddity that the citizens of DC have no voting representation in the Legislative Branch, merely a non-voting representative, (despite paying taxes) and until 1961 couldn't vote in Presidential elections. This from the country that revolted under the battle cry, "No taxation without representation!" The city's residents are disgruntled about it enough that the official DC automobile license plate reads, "Taxation Without Representation".

There is also a feeling among some Americans that there may be a reality distortion field of some sort that follows the outer edge of the Capital Beltway (a highway that circles DC). Attempts to prove this fail to obtain federal funding.

Since the United States is a republic, you will occasionally find people trying to tell you that the United States "is not a democracy." This assumes that a "democracy" only means a direct democracy, and that a representative republic is not a democracy. The US is a republic, a nation that is not a monarchy, where at least some of the population has a say in the affairs of state. The founders thought direct democracy was a bad idea, for example, ThomasJefferson claimed "''A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.''"

Unlike many other nations, the US has a single written constitution, ratified in 1789, which is referred to simply as "the Constitution". The Constitution is "the supreme law of the land" under US law, and all other statutes and acts of government must defer to it or be rendered null and void. The thesis of the thing is that Americans have the right and responsibility to kick the government directly in the ass if it gets too uppity. A beautiful thing.

While the Constitution is not set in stone -- to date there are 27 amendments, the first ten of which are referred to as the Bill of Rights, and while the reasons are complicated, were planned to be put in the constitution before it was ratified. This gives you an idea of how hard the amendment process is -- 17 amendments (two of which are in there to repeal earlier ones) over 220 years is pretty good.

The structure of the federal government is delineated in the Constitution and is often described as a "separation of powers", as the main powers of government are divided between three separate branches -- the executive, legislative, and judicial.

!!!The Executive Branch

The executive branch of government consists of the president, vice president, and the Cabinet. Unlike in many other nations, the US president is both head of state and head of government. His principal powers are to sign or veto bills approved by Congress and to appoint Cabinet secretaries, ambassadors, Supreme Court judges and other federal judges (all with Senate approval), sign treaties subject to Congressional approval and issue pardons, which are not subject to anyone's approval.

Additionally, the president is also the Commander-in-Chief of the military and is the highest-ranking individual in the chain of command, though he is not himself considered part of the military. Lastly, the president may issue "executive orders" -- directives to the Cabinet instructing them on the enforcement of laws passed by the Congress. These are essentially ''laws'', which have to fall under the domain of preexisting laws while claiming to clarify law. Most modern executive orders actually cite the original legislation that they work on. These orders only have to be followed while the president that made it is still in office. ''Most'' executive orders are kept running by the next President in line. Presidents protect the prerogatives of the office. Go figure.

All that gets summed up under the amorphous heading of "leadership", with all the free credit and lightning-rod for dissatisfaction that entails. You don't have to be crazy to run for President. That benefit will be provided by the Office at some point (if the campaign didn't already).

The vice president, in contrast, has little authority and more often functions as a government spokesman. He (no woman has ever been elected, although twice the losing candidate has picked a woman as his running mate), has the cushiest job in the world because he has ''absolutely nothing to do'' unless one of two things fails, thus he has only two official jobs. The first is basically to sit around and wait for the President of the United States to drop dead, and the second is to act as President of the Senate with nothing to do and no right to vote, except cast a tie-breaking vote if there is a deadlock.

JohnAdams, the very first vice president, described his office as "the most insignificant office that ever the invention of man contrived or his imagination conceived." John Nance Garner, FranklinDRoosevelt's first Vice President, was [[BrutalHonesty more direct]], describing the vice presidency as "not worth a bucket of warm piss". The vice president is described as President of the Senate, though he often defers this job to a senior senator called the President Pro Tempore (and even ''that'' guy rarely actually presides), and can not speak or vote in the Senate except in the case of a tie.

If the president dies, resigns, or is otherwise rendered incapable of discharging his duties, the vice president is the first in succession. At several points in American history the vice president has been, in effect, the Highest Elected Patsy, and "taken the fall" for the administration. Since WorldWarII (where HarryTruman didn't know about the Manhattan Project until he took office), the Vice-President has gained some more influence, but it varies between administrations - Dick Cheney was [[PresidentEvil seen as]] [[TheManBehindTheMan very powerful]], Joe Biden [[LordErrorProne less so]].

A presidential term lasts four years, and an individual President is limited to two terms in office, originally as a tradition until it was codified in the Constitution through the 22nd amendment in 1951 after FranklinDRoosevelt stayed in office for four terms, only leaving because [[CriticalExistenceFailure he died]]. Presidential elections are held every four years, on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November.

Actually, in the United States, ''all'' elections are held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in the month of the election. This has historical reasons: the founding fathers didn't want the election to fall on the first of the month, and they didn't want elections on Monday because most people would be too hungover from weekend binge drinking to be able to vote properly.

Historically, the president is a White Protestant, though not always. JohnFKennedy was Catholic, which was a big deal, and current president BarackObama has an African father, which is an even ''bigger'' deal. Historically, the President has also always been male, though fiction has delighted in depicting female presidents and the option is considered more-or-less inevitable by now. Both these generalizations apply equally well to the vice president (twice a woman has been a major party's nomination for veep). Veep candidates are often picked to "balance the ticket", say a Northern liberal to a Southern conservative, or vice versa.

Article 2, clause 5 of the Constitution doesn't really go into race or gender, but does have some qualifications:
*35 years of age or more.
*14 years residency.
*Natural born citizen (read: US citizen by birth, rather than by naturalization) OR citizen at the time the Constitution was adopted.

Fans of ArnoldSchwarzenegger are particularly dismayed by the third item. Note the requirement is technically a little more flexible than "only native-born", but unless you were alive in the September of 1787 AND living between the Mississippi River and the Atlantic Ocean, it's pretty much limited to the native born. Though it was recently codified by Congress that people born in American military bases can be president, which would have been the case with John [=McCain=].

This was rather unnecessary, as it is often mistaken by people that one has to be born in the United States to be a "natural born citizen". While anyone who is born in the USA is a "natural born citizen", one can be born anywhere on Earth (or space) and still be a "natural born citizen" if at least one of your parents is an American citizen who has lived in the USA for a certain number of years.[[hottip:*:Since 1986, it's been five years, with at least two of those after turning 14; it was ten and five, respectively, prior to that.]]

The only two presidents that have actually been challenged in any way under these terms of eligibility to date are BarackObama and ChesterAArthur. Challenges to Obama claim that he was actually born in Kenya, and that his Hawaiian birth certificate (and newspaper announcement) were careful forgeries--never mind that his mother being born and raised in the US still makes him a citizen by birth, and thus by no means ineligible to be President. Those who subscribe to this unusual theory also claim that his mother could not have transmitted citizenship to him because she was too young to have lived in the U.S. the requisite number of years. This is only true if you accept that she spent more than eight months in Kenya (as she gave birth a little over eight months after her 18th birthday), but there's no evidence she ever went there to begin with; nevertheless, this particular supposition has never been tested in a court of law, and probably won't be any time soon. Chester Arthur was accused by a man named Arthur Hinman of being born in Ireland (he had an Irish father) then brought to the US, but no one took up that story, so he then accused that Chet was born in Canada. He was allegedly born in Fairfield, Vermont, extremely close to the border.

The president and vice-president positions were pretty well set up after 1800 as to who got them, and what they did. This lasted until 1841, when WilliamHenryHarrison became the first man to die in office. The exact text of the Constitution said that should something happen to the President making him unable to actually use the President's powers (dead, incapacitated, thrown out), 'the Same shall devolve on the Vice President'. Note that it doesn't explicitly say that the veep became President. This caused a huge stir, which was settled when Harrison's vice president, JohnTyler, just took the damn oath and did it anyway. This was finally patched by the 25th Amendment in 1967.

This of course leaves a hole in the Vice Presidency; up until the 25th Amendment came around, it was just left empty. That amendment lets the sitting president just name his
new page. vice president, with Congress' approval. This led to the only man who never received even one electoral vote ascending. In 1973, Spiro Agnew resigned from the vice presidency (over income tax evasion), and was replaced by GeraldFord. The guy who was president? RichardNixon. Guess [[GateConstruction what happened the next year]].

The 25th Amendment also allows a President to ''temporarily'' relinquish the office due to incapacitation. This has happened a few times, for example, when a sitting president goes in for surgery. The amendment does allow the VP and a majority of the Cabinet to make this declaration for the President; see ''Film/AirForceOne'' for an example or ''[[TwentyFour 24]]''.

The Constitution itself lets Congress decide what happens if both POTUS and VPOTUS ([[FunWithAcronyms (Vice) President of the United States]]) are gone. Currently, this falls under the Presidential Succession Act of 1947. It goes from President, to Vice President, to Speaker of the House, to President ''pro tempore'' of the Senate, to the Cabinet members in order of the Cabinet post's longevity. Since the US hasn't gone past 'vice president' yet on the list, the fact that it ends at the Cabinet hasn't been tested. As an extra extra extra precaution, the Secret Service designates one member of the line of succession the "Designated Survivor" to stay behind at any event where the entire line will be in together. It's a precaution in case the event is attacked and the entire line is wiped out; at least there will be a LastManStanding to assume the Presidency and lead the counter assault (fiction loves this fact). The President pro tempore of the Senate in the line of succession was considered a serious problem in the late 1990s when the extremely elderly Strom Thurmond held the position- today it's held by Robert Byrd, who is 92 and has spent 51 years in the Senate.

What does worry some people are what seem to be paradoxes -- say, if the top 4 were removed, and the Secretary of State moves up, but the House chooses a new speaker, or if a member of the House really should be part of the line in the first place.

This is, naturally, a rich source of drama.

!!!The Electoral College

The president and vice president are ''not'' elected directly by the people, but rather by a group called the Electoral College, an office created by the Founding Fathers to preserve the power of the smaller states in the voting process. They also were not happy about the idea of the "mob" directly electing the president, so they had the state legislatures of each state choose the electors. It is only since the 20th Century that all states allow the common people to choose the electors.

Each state boasts a number of electors equal to its Congressional representation: two senators plus however many representatives. When the College meets, about one month after the actual election, each state's electors vote for the presidential candidates; each state is allowed to set their own laws for how the electors vote, but in recent years 48 states have granted all their votes to whomever received the majority of popular votes in their state. [[hottip:*:The two exceptions are Nebraska and Maine, who instead allocate their congressional electors based on how the congressional districts vote individually - which resulted in Nebraska's 2nd Congressional District (comprised of the Omaha metro area) elector going blue in 2008 while the rest of the state's electors went red.]]

Whichever presidential slate receives 50% + 1 of the electoral votes (currently, 270) is elected. In the rare event that no candidate receives the needed number of electoral votes, the House of Representatives votes in the new president, with the Senate selecting the Vice President.

To date, the House of Representatives has chosen the President on only two occasions: in 1801 and in 1825. To date, the Senate has chosen the Vice President only once, in 1837. Originally the vice president was the runner-up in the presidential election (and the electoral college voted for two men on each ballot), but after a series of disastrous early elections (the 1796 election rendered JohnAdams President and ThomasJefferson Vice President, the two being bitter enemies at the time, and the 1800 election picking the equally acrimonius couple of Jefferson and Aaron Burr), the 12th amendment changed it so that there are separate elections for president and vice president; in practice, this means that candidates run as a single "ticket", but in theory electors could vote for one ticket's candidate for President and another ticket's candidate for Vice President.

On those occasions when a loser of the ''popular'' election gains office through this process - thankfully a rare occasion, but the most recent case was in 2000 - many Americans become confused and outraged. Newspapers and TV news are required to run articles explaining this all again for about two weeks, at which point it is promptly forgotten by Americans who have since moved on to something else outrageously confusing, like why all the rich celebrities are ending up in rehab all the time.

In fact, because of the number of electors being equivalent roughly to population density, all one has to do is be elected president is to win the 11 states that have the most delegates (California, Texas, New York, Florida, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Georgia, North Carolina, and New Jersey), and they will win the election even if their opponent wins all of the delegates of all the other 39 states and the District of Columbia.

In reality this strategy doesn't work simply because of the fact that recent historical trends have Democrats enjoying comfortable margins in California and New York while Republicans enjoy a comfortable margin in Texas. With the three most populous states already effectively given to these parties, contests ensue in areas where a particular party's control of the area is dependent upon the phases of the moon, the tides, the time of day and how popular the President/Congress is in that state. Thus a lot of election drama ends up happening in 'swing' or 'battleground' states, which are states that have become strategically important in the election. Even if it's a small state, during a very close election political battles can ensue simply to deny those three or four electoral votes to the other party.

In the course of these campaigns, presidential hopefuls spend millions upon millions of dollars on advertising, travel, staff, and various other campaign expenses, all for a job which pays a mere $400,000 per year over four years. And yet, the winner is largely in charge of how the American government spends its revenue. The irony of this is not lost on the American people.

!!!The Cabinet

The cabinet currently consists of 15 departments - State, the Treasury, Defense (formerly War), Justice, the Interior, Agriculture, Commerce, Labor, Health and Human Services, Housing and Urban Development ([=HUD=]), Transportation, Energy, Education, Veterans' Affairs (there are a ''lot'' of US military veterans) and Homeland Security.

Each department is headed by an officer called a Secretary (except for the Department of Justice, whose head is called the Attorney General, though the AG functions as a Secretary), who is appointed by the president at the beginning of each new term, subject to Senate approval. The average American has heard of maybe two of these guys, usually taken from the Secretaries of State, Treasury, and Defense, and the AG. Defense has some Secretaries under the Secretary of Defense, namely the Secretary of the Navy (or [[{{NCIS}} SECNAV as people call him or her]]), Secretary of the Air Force and Secretary of Army.

Cabinet offices may be created, merged, or abolished by act of Congress, and this has occurred many times throughout American history - initially, the Cabinet consisted solely of the Departments of State, War, and the Treasury; although there was an Attorney-General, he didn't get any support staff (i.e. the Department of Justice) until 1870. The Department of Defense was created in 1947 by the merger of the Departments of War, the Navy, and the Air Force, for example, whereas the current Department of Education and [=HUD=] were established by splitting the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. The Postmaster General (i.e. the director of the U.S. Postal Service) was formerly a Cabinet-level office, prior to the Post Office's 1971 reorganization into a government-owned corporation. The most recent Cabinet office established was Homeland Security, which originated as an "Office of Homeland Security" shortly after 9/11 and was given Cabinet-level status in 2003.

The powers of the Cabinet are not expressly delineated in the Constitution and have changed often throughout US history. Unlike many other countries, the Interior Department is not in charge of police or security (on the federal level, that goes to the FBI, one of the "agencies" mentioned below and part of the Department of Justice), but with federal lands and resources. The Cabinet Secretaries are in the Presidential line of succession, in the order listed above, though they're preceded by the Vice President and the two leaders of the legislative chambers (the Speaker of the House and the President ''pro tempore''.) Oh, and you still have to qualify under the Article 2, clause 5 bit; during the Clinton presidency, foreign-born Madeline Albright, despite being Secretary of State, would have been skipped were succession to go that far.

The President can completely ignore the views of his cabinet if he or she wants.

Beneath the cabinet are various government agencies: the Federal Aviation Administration, for example, reports to the Secretary of Transportation. Some agencies may be (or were) in counter-intuitive departments. The Secret Service (originally founded to combat counterfeiting) and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms reported to the Treasury Secretary before the Department of Homeland Security was created. There are also a number of "independent agencies", like the Federal Communications Commission and NASA, that don't report to any of the above, in order to make organization charts that much more confusing.

In aggregate, this is commonly referred to as the Bureaucracy: the number two government source of fear, after the [[IntimidatingRevenueService Internal Revenue Service]], which reports to Congress (see below), which means that whatever the IRS does has no single master. You ''can'' sue City Hall. Any suit against the IRS will not be decided in your lifetime.

!!!The Legislative Branch

->'''JohnAdams:''' I have come to the conclusion that one useless man is called a disgrace, that two become a law firm, and that any group of three or more is called a Congress!
->''[[SeventeenSeventySix 1776]]'', paraphrased from the historical Adams' writings

The legislative branch of government consists of a Congress made up of two houses - the House of Representatives and the Senate.

The House of Representatives has 435 members apportioned among the states based on their population.[[hottip:*: Originally the number of representatives was about 1 for every 30,000 citizens - it was fixed at 435 when it was realized that continued population growth would overcrowd the Capitol.]] States with a population smaller than 1/435th of the total population (approximately 693,000 at present) receive one representative, while larger states receive a larger share. Apportionment is recalculated every ten years, after each national census. Each state is free to determine how congressional districts (similar to Parliamentary constituencies in the UK) are drawn up, with the proviso (since the [[TheSixties 60s]] cases ''Baker'' v. ''Carr'', ''Reynolds'' v. ''Sims'', and ''Wesberry'' v. ''Sanders'') that each district must be roughly equal in population.

This can (and frequently does) lead to a practice called "gerrymandering" where the party in charge draws up ridiculously-shaped districts so as to secure as many safe districts for themselves while splitting up the other party's strongholds across multiple districts. Gerrymandering is legal, believe it or not; both parties squawk about reform, but neither is willing to be the first one to give up its precious ''safe seats''. The name, incidentally, goes right back to the beginnings of the Republic, first appearing around 1812 and taking its name from Massachusetts governor Elbridge Gerry. The practice might have started even earlier.

Representatives are elected every two years and there is no limit on the number of terms one may serve.

While the House of Representatives is generally referred to as the "junior" house, this has little practical meaning, as bills can originate in either house, with the exception that bills for raising revenue must originate in the House of Representatives. The House also reserves the power to impeach the president or other federal officers upon a simple majority vote, whereupon a trial is carried out in the Senate. The House is chaired by an officer called '''the Speaker of the House''', who is generally a senior representative from the majority party in the House.

Interestingly, unlike Parliamentary systems, the Speaker does not legally need to be a sitting representative or ever have been a representative at all, they just need to be any person that 51% of the House wants to be Speaker. In practice, though, no Congress has ever taken advantage of this potentially fun loophole, and instead the Speaker is always some sort of party leader. The Speaker is chosen at the beginning of each new Congress by a simple majority vote -- this vote is largely a formality, but don't tell the congressmen that: ''huge'' penalties like losing chairmanship positions are dolled out for not voting for your party's pick.

Like the President Pro Tempore, the Speaker rarely actually presides and typically delegates that duty to a rotating roster of Representatives, usually from the majority party. The current Speaker is Nancy Pelosi, of the Democratic party, who represents SanFrancisco, [=CA=].

The Senate consists of two Senators from each state. Originally, Senators were appointed by the state legislatures, but after the passage of the 17th amendment in 1916 they became publicly elected officers. Senators serve a term of six years and have no limit on the number of terms they can serve. The Senate is described as the senior house of Congress, and reserves the power to confirm presidential appointees, ratify treaties, and conduct the trial of an impeached president or other officer, whereupon the accused may be removed from office by a two-thirds majority.

Only two presidents have ever been impeached - Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton - and both escaped conviction. Richard Nixon would have been impeached, but resigned first. The Senate is chaired either by the Vice President or by the '''President Pro Tempore''', the most senior senator of the entire Senate, regardless of party affiliation. However, because President Pro Tems are, well, ''old'', they don't always have the constitution to preside over long, grueling hours of debate. Informally, the reins of power are wielded by the "Majority Leader" - ie, the senator who chairs the majority party's caucus. The current President Pro Tempore is Robert Byrd, Democrat from West Virginia, and the current majority leader is Harry Reid, of the same party, who represents Nevada.

In order for a bill to become law, it must pass by a simple majority in both houses and receive the president's signature. The president has the power to "veto" a bill, though Congress may override his veto with a two-thirds majority. Overridden vetoes are somewhat rare, and were virtually non-existent for the first 90 years of the nation's history. The Senate is considered the more "deliberative" of the two houses, especially in that its rules place no time limit on how long debate can go on before a vote is held on a bill.

A senator determined to block the passage of a bill can "filibuster" its vote by lodging endless procedural motions to delay, or simply getting up and talking for hours and hours until the bill's proponents get tired and go home. The record for a speech on the Senate floor is ''24 hours and 18 minutes''[[hottip:*: by Strom Thurmond, opposing the 1957 Civil Rights Act]]. Indeed, it takes more votes to end debate and bring a bill to a final vote - 60 votes, or three-fifths of the Senate - than it does to actually pass the bill once it comes to a vote. Scrapping the filibuster - the so-called "nuclear option" - has been considered by various blocs over the years, most recently the Republicans in 2005 and the Democrats in 2009, but the general feeling has been that for a majority party to do so would weaken their position when and if they become the minority party.

Because Senators are elected by the entire population of each state, serve terms three times longer than Representatives, and number the same from each state regardless of the size of the state's population, the Senate also tends to be more conservative and less radical than the House -- in other words, less subject to the changing whims of the people (hence why the Founders originally made them elected by the legislatures). YourMileageMayVary on whether this is to its benefit or its detriment, because while it makes the Senate less partisan, less divisive, and more capable of passing important legislation, it also makes Senators less accountable to their constituents.

Congress can also propose amendments to the Constitution, which must receive two-thirds majority in both houses and must then be approved by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states. There is no limitation on the scope of what an amendment may do, except that no state's Senate representation may be reduced without its consent. Unless explicitly stated in the text of the bill proposing it, there is no time limit on ratification; the proposal that eventually became the 27th amendment, for example, was first proposed shortly after the Constitutional Convention in 1789, and was fully ratified and enrolled in the Constitution two centuries later in 1992. The states also have the power to bypass Congress, and by the request of two-thirds of the state governments may call a Constitutional convention for proposing amendments, which upon approval by the convention must then be ratified in the normal fashion. To date, this has never occurred.

Yes, the representation for which Americans fought in the Revolution is this. Essentially two committees, one with 435 members and one with 100, who must pass bills twice each in order to send them to the President's desk. Pretty clever way to keep government busy in such a way that it can't get too uppity.

!!!The Judicial Branch

The judicial branch consists of the Supreme Court and the lesser Courts of Appeals established under it.

The Supreme Court consists of a number of judges, called justices, who are appointed by the president subject to Senate confirmation, and who serve "during good behavior", which, barring conviction or impeachment, means a lifetime tenure. The number of justices is not set by the Constitution, but is set by the Legislative Branch. For quite awhile now the number has been nine. The Supreme Court is the ultimate body of appeal in US law, and is charged with the task of reviewing cases where the constitutionality of a law or governmental act is in question. If a law is deemed "unconstitutional" - that is, contradictory to the letter or spirit of the Constitution - the Court has the power to declare it null and void by a majority vote of justices. The Court also has the power to settle disputes between the states themselves, but this power rarely has a chance to exercise itself. The Court is also the highest level of appeal for all issues of federal law even when constitutionality is not a issue.

The Court is led by the Chief Justice (currently John Roberts, who replaced William Rehnquist when the latter died), a position that has the duties of chairing any meeting of the Court for both selection of cases to review and ruling on said cases. However, he or she does not have more power in any actual vote. The Chief Justice also has the Constitutional duty of presiding over any impeachments of the President or Vice President (but not other officers), and traditionally administers the Oath of Office to new presidents and Supreme Court Justices (including his or her successor) unless unavailable (Calvin Coolidge was sworn in by his father, a notary public, after learning of WarrenHarding's death, and LyndonJohnson was sworn in by a federal district court judge, on-board AirForceOne in Dallas, shortly after Kennedy's assassination). The Chief Justice is also administrator of the Federal Court system, making his position the technical equivalent of a cabinet secretary. WilliamHowardTaft is the only person to have ever served both as President and as Chief Justice.

"Good behavior" is the only Constitutional requirement for a justice, so the office is theoretically open to anyone who the President may choose to nominate. ''Most'' nominees tend to be federal judges, but approximately one-third of all historical justices (including Chief Justices Warren and Rehnquist) had never sat on the bench prior to their nomination.

In short, this committee tries to make sense of the output of the other two committees. They have a tougher rule to follow, in that they cannot "tie" on an issue, no matter how much they try to (the 5-4 Court vote is one of the most dreaded things in American politics). Since a justice might be absent from a case due to illness or he "recuses" (removes) himself because of a conflict of interest (it is up to the justice themselves to decide if they wish to recuse themselves) it is possible to have a 4-4 tie. Since almost every case before the court is an appeal, in the case of a tie, the decision of the court below the Supreme Court is upheld.

On the plus side (for them), legally the only person that can overrule the Court decision is a later Court Decision or Constitutional Amendment.

Still with us? This is the committee that is meant to simplify things.

The Supreme Court is theoretically an apolitical body, though more often than not presidents will appoint a judge whose political opinions agree with their own. Of course, it's hard to tell how a justice will rule once he's on the bench - the recently-retired David Souter, a justice appointed by GeorgeHWBush, was commonly considered one of the more liberal-minded justices. At present, six of the nine justices on the bench were appointed by Republican presidents. Of the nine, four are typically considered "conservative", three "liberal", and two "right-leaning moderate". The fact that Justices serve for life means that they, unlike Congress and the President, are free to issue rulings purely based on their own judgment and conscience, without worrying about the whims of public opinion, party support, or reelection. Supreme Court justices theoretically can be impeached, however, this has only occurred once, and the justice in question was acquitted.

!!!The States

There are, at present, 50 states in the Union. Kentucky, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and Virginia are called Commonwealths in their full names, but there is no distinction between them and states. There is also the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, which are possessions of the United States, and not states at all. Clear as mud so far? Good, because it gets more interesting as we go along.

Each state is required by the Constitution to guarantee its citizens a "republican form of government". For the most part, state governments are identical in their structure and function to the federal government, but on a smaller scale. Nebraska has a single-house legislature; the other 49 mimic the Federal Government, although some states have a Senate and an Assembly instead of a House of Representatives (and due to unique circumstances of history, Virginia, West Virginia, and Maryland each have a House of ''Delegates''). The chief executive of a state is called a governor; his/her deputy, who may or may not be elected on the same ticket, is called a lieutenant governor. Not, however, in the case of Arizona, Wyoming, and Oregon, which have no lieutenant governor. There, when the Governor has either resigned or been impeached, the elected official who is technically the chief clerk of the state, the Secretary of State, becomes governor.

Nearly all 50 states have an elected chief clerk who is called the Secretary of that state, who, because that is an elected official, is not considered a cabinet secretary in the same way as the other cabinet departments of the Governor's Cabinet. As noted above, in most states, the Secretary of State of that state is the third in line to become Governor after the Lieutenant Governor. Note that while each ''state'' has a Secretary of State, this should not be confused with the head of the U.S. State Department, who is also called the Secretary of State. The one who runs the State Department in Washington (in the area of D.C. called ''Foggy Bottom'') deals with the relationships between the United States and other countries, while each ''state's'' Secretary of State deals with the operations of that particular state. Nice and confusing, isn't it?

New states may be admitted to the Union upon Congressional approval. States may not raise their own armies (they are required by law to maintain an organized militia in the form of the Army and Air National Guards, and may raise a optional militia for in state use only), sign treaties (but with permission of Congress they may enter into a ''Compact'' with other states), or coin money on their own, and when a conflict between state and federal law arises, federal law wins out. Conversely, federal laws have little impact on the lives of most Americans except in the broadest terms, with most everyday legal and criminal issues being decided and enforced on the state level. However, when a Federal court has to decide an issue regarding state matters, it must use state law to decide the issue. This is why most large corporations are chartered in Delaware or Nevada, because the rules of the state law where the corporation is chartered determines how it is to be governed.

One major difference between the states and the federal governments is that states hold a lot more elections. A state need not limit its elections to the legislature and the governor, as the federal government does; they can also hold elections for secretary of state, attorney general, comptroller, state supreme court judges, judges of lower courts, district attorneys, sheriffs, and/or dog catchers. Much of this will be specified in the state constitution, which is generally amended by popular vote as well. Many states also have a procedure where an elected official may be removed (recalled) from office in a special election if a sufficient number of petitions are gathered. A recent example of this occurred in 2003, when California governor Gray Davis was successfully recalled and replaced by ArnoldSchwarzenegger in a special election that included 135 candidates for the office.

All this voting theoretically makes state governments more accountable to the people. In practice, this doesn't quite work. Which is why in some states you have Initiative and Referendum, where, if the legislature doesn't pass an acceptable law, the people can propose one (meaning some well funded group or bunch of people ticked off enough send out people to collect signatures to have a ballot proposal put up for election). This is how the famous ''Proposition 13'' slashed property taxes in California. It's also how a major manufacturer of gambling equipment and supplies was able to get a state lottery created there as well. As these referenda are often written by non-politicians, or people with little formal legal training, they may ultimately prove to be of dubious constitutionality when enacted into law, and parts or all of them are often struck down by the courts after their passage. Proposition 187, a 1994 initiative in California that sought to deny certain entitlements and legal protections to illegal immigrants, was eventually struck down by the courts, and the recently-passed Proposition 8 (which reversed the state Supreme Court's legalization of gay marriage) may be headed to a similar fate.

!!!Local Government

The Constitution says nothing about government below the state level, so states are free to set up whatever structure they'd like. There's a lot of variation from state to state here (Connecticut has no county governments, while Hawaii has no municipal governments), so this is just a general overview.

48 of the 50 states are divided into counties. The exceptions: Louisiana is divided into "parishes", which are identical to counties in all but name. Alaska is divided into "boroughs", which actually are a bit different from counties, but not enough to matter for our purposes. County governments are usually headed by a "Board of Supervisors" or "Board of Commissioners" or the like, and may have a "County Executive" overseeing the executive departments.

Size doesn't matter, nor does population. The least populous county is in the largest state, Loving County, Texas, and at last count had 69 people. Number doesn't matter: Texas has 250 counties, Delaware has 3. Some states have laws that set minimum sizes on counties, or prohibit adding more counties. The smallest county is Arlington County, Virginia at 26 square miles. The largest (aside from the Alaskan boroughs) is California's San Bernadino County, which is bigger than each of the nine smallest states.

For an example of comparisons the states of Iowa (56 thousand square miles/2.9 million people), Kansas (82/2.6), Oklahoma (69/3.5) Nebraska (77/1.7), Minnesota (87/4.9), and Colorado (104/4.3) as a region have over 476,000 square miles and 19.9 million people. But this entire region obviously deserves considerably less attention and less resources than NewYorkCity, which has 468 square miles and 18.8 million people, even though New York has 1/1000 of the area and fewer people.

Municipal government can take various forms; depending on the state, municipalities can be called "cities", "towns", "villages", "townships", "boroughs", or something else, which may or may not have different meanings or governmental structures. A "town" is usually the smallest type of government, but there can be towns that have larger populations than some cities. Larger cities usually have their executive power vested in an elected mayor, with the city council (also elected) having legislative power over local ordinances. Smaller cities and towns tend to use a "city manager" system, in which the city council appoints a professional urban planner to run the executive departments, and the office of mayor is either nonexistent, ceremonial, or a glorified City Councilor.

The services provided by counties and cities overlap a lot (the police/sheriff's department, fire department, transportation, parks, etc.) and the precise arrangement varies from state to state, and sometimes within states as well. If there are any areas outside municipal governments, the county will provide all services there. In some states, mostly in the Northeast, cities and towns cover the entire state; this is how Connecticut gets away with not having any counties at all.

Cities can be combined with a county (like Denver and SanFrancisco), cross county lines (like Dallas, in five different counties), exist outside any county (like Baltimore, St. Louis, and all 'cities' in Virginia), or take up entire counties and merge with the county governments (NewYorkCity's five boroughs are five separate counties, none of which has an independent government). Many metropolitan areas cross state boundaries, but cities are always in the same state (Kansas City Missouri/Kansas is actually two separate cities).

There are also [[AmericanEducationalSystem elected school boards]] that operate local schools independent of any government in much of the country, as well as special districts or government corporations providing services, but describing all of them would make this article even more complicated than it is.

In short, then, the membership of all the elected committees in American government -- federal, state, county, and municipal -- is north of 60,000. In a country where getting five friends to agree on where to have dinner can result in fist-fights.

!!!Additionally ...

Separate from the states are several US territories, including Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands, that are also under American sovereignty. Thirty one states were territories (or part of a territory) at one point, but these in particular have for various reasons never received statehood -- Puerto Rico in particular has had several elections on the matter, all of which have been voted down by its citizens. Their citizens also receive United States citizenship, meaning that if they choose to "emigrate" to any of the states, they have no legal problems, with the exception of American Samoa who are considered "American Nationals". Unlike states, territories do not have representation in Congress; however, they also do not have to pay federal taxes, so many would argue they got the better deal.

This is part of the reason that Americans are bewildered when non-Americans have opinions about all Americans. On any apartment corridor in the States you can have, per door, a different language, philosophy, level of education, financial condition ... How in the Nine Circles does anyone generalize from that?

!!!Political Parties

The Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution with the intent of creating a state free from the influence of political parties. In this they failed, as parties began forming while the ink was still wet on the parchment, arguing over whether the federal government or individual states should have the greater power. Though parties have less ''official'' influence than they do in most countries, they still hold an immense amount of sway in the government, largely due to the funding they can collect for candidates who agree with their policies.

There are two major parties in the US today. The general feeling among Americans about these parties is that one of them is evil, and the other is incompetent. Which is which depends on whom you ask. Neither party is as heavily united ideologically as parties in other countries, although a great deal of common ground exists, and officials known as "party whips" are employed to keep each party's representatives in line.

*The '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_(United_States) Democratic Party]]''' is traditionally viewed as being center-left, although in most Western countries, they would be considered centrist or tepidly social-democratic. The Democratic party was born in the aftermath of the disastrous 1824 election, when four candidates from the now-defunct Democratic-Republican party split the electoral vote, and the House of Representatives narrowly awarded the presidency to JohnQuincyAdams, rather than popular vote winner AndrewJackson. Jackson was so irritated by the decision that he [[StartMyOwn founded his own party]] and ran again four years later, defeating Adams by a landslide. In the modern era, the Democratic party is perhaps best known for a strong stance in favor of civil liberties, social justice, environmentalism, labor unions, and broad-reaching social welfare programs. Democrats tend to promote [[AmericanGunPolitics gun control laws]] more than the Republicans, ranging from advocating outright bans to just requiring background checks and waiting periods before acquisition, although there are major exceptions within both parties. The Democrats are also more liberal on social issues (such as abortion and gay rights) than the Republicans, and are often perceived as the more "secular" of the two parties. Their base consists of the urban poor, organized labor, minorities, educated liberals, and Hollywood celebrities, and their main geographic centers are the Northeast, the industrial parts of the Midwest, the West Coast, and urban areas in general. They are also known for doing very well in the richest per-capita zip codes in the country. Historically, they were the favored party of Southern whites, due to the association of the Republicans with AbrahamLincoln and the [[TheAmericanCivilWar defeat of the Confederacy]], although most of them quickly defected to the Republicans after the Democrats supposedly "betrayed" the white man by supporting {{Civil rights|Movement}}. Even so, some Southerners remained loyal to the Democrats, creating a small conservative bloc within the party known as the Blue Dogs. Notable Democratic US presidents have included AndrewJackson, WoodrowWilson, FranklinDRoosevelt, JohnFKennedy, BillClinton, and BarackObama. Their official symbol is the donkey, and their unofficial color is blue.
*The '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_(United_States) Republican Party]]''', or the GOP (Grand Old Party, despite being younger than the Democrats), is the center-right party in American politics. They were originally a more progressive party when they were founded in 1854 as an anti-slavery party (there were Republican parties going back as far as 1825, but the modern Republican Party maintains continuity with this one). Today, however, they are the more conservative of the two major parties. The GOP encompasses a number of political philosophies, most of them brought together under RonaldReagan, including classical conservatism, neo-conservatism, and libertarianism, and since the late '70s, they have become the favored party of conservative Christians (though not universally - the Rev. Billy Graham is a lifelong Democrat). Traditionally, the Republicans have always been the pro-business, pro-free market party, favoring the loosening of regulations and environmental laws. Socially speaking, the Republicans tend to favor [[AmericanGunPolitics lawful gun ownership]], the death penalty, and limited governmental intervention on matters like health and education, while being fairly conservative on social and cultural issues like abortion, gay rights, and religion. Recently, it has also tended to favor large defense investments and an aggressive foreign policy. For their base, they rely on conservative Christian "values voters" and the Southern whites that the Democrats had abandoned when they supported civil rights, as well as business owners and [[{{Suburbia}} suburban families]]. Their main strength is in the South, the more rural areas of the Midwest (and rural areas in general), and to an extent, the suburbs. Notable Republican US presidents have included AbrahamLincoln, [[TheodoreRoosevelt Theodore "Teddy" Roosevelt]], DwightDEisenhower, RichardNixon, RonaldReagan, and both [[GeorgeHWBush George]] [[GeorgeWBush Bushes]]. Their official symbol is the elephant, and their unofficial color is red.

It's important to note that the American definitions of "liberal" and "conservative" are rather different from how the terms are used in most of the rest of the world. In most societies, a liberal favors letting events take their course unimpeded by government control, while a conservative wants government to maintain the status quo through laws and regulations. In the US, however, these meanings are reversed, particularly on economic matters -- it is conservatives (Republicans) who favor small government and the free market, while liberals (Democrats) call for fair markets and consumer protection through regulation. These are ''huge'' generalizations, of course.

For social and moral issues, it's more complicated, and generally extremists on ''both'' ends tend to favor government policies that enforce their values and restrict (or outright prohibit) behavior they disapprove of, while moderates, who make up the vast majority of the American populace, would rather they all just shut up about it.

Also, note the unofficial colors of the two parties. In most of the Western world, the color red is used for left-wing parties (red having traditionally been the color of socialism), while blue was given to right-wing parties. In America, however, this is reversed -- the center-left (by American standards) Democrats have blue as their color, while the center-right Republicans are red. The terms "red states" and "blue states" stem from this dichotomy. This is [[NewerThanTheyThink a surprisingly recent development]] that dates back to the 2000 election, when the major networks all used these colors to represent each party. Other colors had been used before (including red for the Dems and blue for the GOP in 1996), but the long, drawn-out 2000 election cemented the red-vs-blue meme in the public consciousness. This sometimes creates confusion for Canadians and Europeans, who wonder why the Americans just don't do things the way the rest of the world does them (just like how they wonder why America uses [[AmericanCustomaryMeasurements a completely different system of weights and measures from every other country on Earth]]). The truth is that the Democrats were not formed as part of the Labor Movement of the 1800s to early 1900s from which most red-colored center-left parties got their start, and thus it wouldn't really be appropriate to demand they use red since they ''became'' a center-left party rather than were founded as one.

There are a number of smaller groups, typically called "third parties" in the US, which are largely active only at the municipal or state level and rarely, if ever, elect members to federal office. The largest third parties in the country are as follows:
*The '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_Party_(United_States) Constitution Party]]''' is the third largest political party according to [[http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/120108.html Ballot Access News]] as of 2008. They are an ultra-conservative party which favors states' rights, ending the income tax and "unconstitutional spending", isolationism, protectionist/mercantilist trade policies, gun rights, strong opposition to immigration, a generally fundamentalist Christian stance on most social and cultural issues (although there is a small secular bloc within the party), repeal of the Patriot Act, and withdrawal from the UnitedNations and free trade agreements. They have a great deal of credibility among [[RightWingMilitiaFanatic far-right]] {{conspiracy theorist}} crowds, as evidenced when their last Presidential candidate (who, not coincidentally, was endorsed by prominent conspiracy radio host Alex Jones) implied that he believed 9/11 to have been a FalseFlagOperation, and openly stated that he believed that JFK's assassination [[WhoShotJFK was a conspiracy]]. Since the election of BarackObama, the aims of the Constitution Party and those of the Republican party have become increasingly indistinguishable.
*The '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_Party_(United_States) Libertarian Party]]''' is pretty much ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin: it aims to be the leading party for libertarianism. Libertarians tend to favor maximum individual liberty (pro-gun rights, pro-gay rights, pro-drug legalization, pro-legal abortion, anti-Patriot Act), maximum economic liberty (loose environmental and worker safety laws, pro-free trade, anti-tax, anti-bailout), and very limited government involvement in social welfare. They oppose the Iraq War and believe in a non-interventionist foreign policy, feeling that the military should only be used for the purpose of defending the United States. Libertarians do not identify themselves as "left" or "right" in the traditional sense -- most would argue for a bi-axial system of political identification, with "conservative" and "liberal" on the economic axis and "libertarian" and "authoritarian" on the social axis.
*The '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Party_(United_States) Green Party]]''' is probably the most famous third party in the country, mainly thanks to their high-profile Presidential run in 2000. By any measure, they are quite leftist, supporting fair trade, pacifism, an end to the War on Drugs, local government, internationalism, very liberal views on civil liberties and social issues, opposition to the Patriot Act, and a strong welfare state -- in other words, not too far from European-style social democrats. Their main focus, however, is environmentalism, as their name suggests. Supporters are often stereotyped as tree-hugging hippies and socialists. If you see a character in fiction who supports the Green Party, then he or she is probably a NewAgeRetroHippie or a GranolaGirl.

While the modern third parties have not been very successful at winning elections, they're often very effective at being "protest" votes: if a voter feels that his Democratic party's candidate for, let's say state house, is too conservative on issues such as environmental protection or healthcare, that voter can vote Green Party in protest of the candidate. This weakens the candidate's base and increases the possibility that the Republican opponent can win the seat. The next time around, the Democratic Party or the Democratic candidate are more likely to heed the whims of their constituents and will adjust their stance on those above issues accordingly. It sounds like a roundabout method, but it can be pretty effective.

Keep in mind these are by no means the only third parties in the United States, or the oldest (none of the three date back earlier than 1970). Third parties have a long history in US politics, and have been known to take up issues that would later be co-opted by the major parties. Here is a list of some of the more notable ones throughout history:
*The '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Masonic_Party Anti-Masonic Party]]''', [[ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin as its name suggests]], was formed in 1828 in opposition to what they felt was [[ConspiracyTheorist the corrupting influence of]] [[AncientConspiracy Freemasonry]], although it would eventually pursue a more general opposition to [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacksonian_democracy Jacksonian democracy]]. It introduced such political traditions as party platforms and nominating conventions, as well as being the TropeMaker for single-issue political parties. At their height in 1832, they managed to win 7.78% of the popular vote, with their greatest strength in Vermont (who gave them their only electoral college victory) and in New York. The movement would fizzle out and be absorbed into the growing Whig party by 1838 (Freemasonry no longer being that hot of an issue), although not before running future President WilliamHenryHarrison in the 1836 election.
*The '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Know_Nothing Know Nothings]]''' were a political party that existed under the names '''Native American Party''' from 1845 to 1855, and the '''American Party''' from then until 1860. The Know Nothings were a nativist movement that was strongly opposed to immigration (particularly from Ireland and Germany), which they blamed for the crime in the cities, and Catholicism, which they felt was a foreign plot to subvert and overthrow American democracy. The name "Know Nothing" comes from the secret groups that preceded the party, whose members were told to say "I know nothing" if they were confronted about their involvement. They enjoyed massive success in the mid-1850s thanks to the collapse of the Whig Party and the two-party system, but they soon splintered and fell apart over the issue of slavery. The term "Know Nothing" would go on to be used as a derogatory term for a nativist for decades to come.
*The '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition_Party Prohibition Party]]''' was founded in 1869 to call for the restriction and prohibition of alcoholic substances. It had its greatest success in 1919, when national alcohol prohibition was enacted, causing it to change its message to calling for stricter enforcement of the ban. However, the growing distaste for prohibition cost them dearly, and the repeal of prohibition in 1933 set the party on a long decline. The party still exists, but in the last election, it only earned 643 votes -- a far cry from the days when they could win over a quarter of a million votes. By sheer twist of fate, they were responsible for the election of the first female mayor in American history, and did so completely by accident. For fun, take a look on their [[Wikipedia Other Wiki]] page and see where they held their conventions. Going down the list, it's kind of sad.
*There have been various groups that have been known as the '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Populist_Party_(United_States) Populist Party]]''' over the decades, but the most famous one is the '''People's Party''', which existed from 1884 to 1908. The Populists were an agrarian movement born out of anger at falling crop prices and rising railroad rates, and called for economic action against the banks, the railroads and the merchants of the cities. The main plank in their platform was bringing an end to the gold standard and replacing it with the free coinage of silver currency, an issue that resonated among struggling farmers (rapid inflation would allow credit to flow more freely in rural areas and make it much easier to pay off debt). The Populists had their greatest success in 1892, when they won over a million votes and four western states. However, the 1896 campaign saw the Democrats co-opting the Populists' support of free silver, which was a stake through the heart for the movement. While the party withered into irrelevance after that, much of their platform, which included an eight-hour work week, civil service reforms, a graduated income tax, and direct election of Senators, would be co-opted by the progressive movement in the early 20th century.
*The '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Party_(United_States,_1912) Progressive Party]]''', also known as the '''Bull Moose Party''', was a vehicle for former President TheodoreRoosevelt's 1912 Presidential run. The Progressive Party was the culmination of the progressive movement, which called for broad-reaching social reforms for America's working classes, including a pension system, income taxes, women's suffrage, farm relief, the right of labor to organize, and expanded access to health care. The Progressive Party is notable for being the only third party to beat one of the major parties in an election, winning 27% of the popular vote (as opposed to WilliamHowardTaft's 23%) and 88 electoral votes. This split in the Republican Party allowed WoodrowWilson to win the election. The name of the Progressive Party would be revived in 1924 by Wisconsin governor Robert La Follette, who won 17% of the vote and the state of Wisconsin on a similar platform to the original party, and again in 1948 by Henry Wallace and other leftist Democrats opposed to HarryTruman, which won 1.1 million votes but no electoral votes.
*The '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Party_of_America Socialist Party]]''' existed from 1901 until 1972, and enjoyed its greatest success in the early 20th century. In the elections of 1912 and 1920, the Socialists won over 900,000 votes with their candidate Eugene V. Debs (keeping in mind that, in the latter case, he was ''[[SugarWiki/CrowningMomentOfAwesome in prison]]''). They endorsed Robert La Follette in 1924 and continued to build support in the 1920s, but their support was undercut by [[FranklinDRoosevelt FDR's]] New Deal during {{the Great Depression}}. After [[WorldWarII the war]], [[RedScare anti-Communist fears]] caused the Socialist Party to fade away, and they finally broke into three parties in 1972 over the issue of {{the Vietnam War}}.
*The '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dixiecrat States' Rights Democratic Party]]''', or simply the '''Dixiecrats''', were a faction that broke off from the Democratic Party in 1948 in protest of the Democrats' support for {{civil rights|Movement}}. The Dixiecrats, running on a segregationist platform, nominated Senator Strom Thurmond and managed to win over 1.1 million votes, 39 electoral votes and [[DeepSouth four Southern states]]. The Dixiecrats faded away as a party after 1948, but the split between Northern and Southern Democrats continued to linger, leading to...
*The '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Independent_Party American Independent Party]]''', another segregationist splinter from the Democrats, this time from 1968 and led by Alabama Governor George Wallace. The American Independents won 13.5% of the popular vote, 46 electoral votes and five Southern states. The success of Wallace's candidacy, combined with RichardNixon's "Southern strategy," marked the end of the once-Democratic "Solid South," which felt that the Democrats had betrayed the principles of white supremacy.
*The '''[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reform_Party_(United_States) Reform Party]]''' was a populist third party established in the wake of Texas billionaire Ross Perot's 1992 independent Presidential run, which won 19% of the popular vote and became the first Presidential campaign since 1912 that was seen as having been capable of winning an election. Riding a wave of discontent aimed at both the Democrats and Republicans, Perot established the Reform Party in 1996 to turn his success into a lasting political movement. The party won 8% of the popular vote that year, a far cry from 1992, but still a very impressive third party showing. The Reform Party had its greatest success in 1998 when Jesse Ventura was elected governor of Minnesota, but it soon fell prey to infighting between three groups: the "old guard" Perot faction, the libertarian Ventura faction, and a Christian conservative wing led by Pat Buchanan. The party collapsed in the wake of the 2000 election, where its nomination was won by former Republican candidate and pundit Pat Buchanan, and while there is still a national organization, the party no longer meaningfully exists as a national entity.

Currently, there are two third-party federal office holders, both of them senators. The first is Bernie Sanders, a senator from Vermont who identifies himself as a socialist, campaigns as an independent but for all intents and purposes caucuses ("hangs out") with the Democrats. The second is Joseph Lieberman, a senator from Connecticut who was not renominated by the Democratic Party in the 2006 election, but ran as an "Independent Democrat" without party funding and won reelection anyway.

No third party candidate has ever been elected president; even when the Republican Party won its first presidential election with Abraham Lincoln in 1860, it was already one of the top two parties going into the election year. However, there have been several third party candidacies with a sizable impact on the two-party race -- which is to say, backlash on the third-party voters' second choice. This is known as the "spoiler" effect, most recently observed when Ross Perot ran as an independent candidate in 1992 and received 19% of the popular vote and split conservatives, and in 2000, where Green Party candidate Ralph Nader's showing of 2% was sufficient to tip the scales for George W. Bush's favor in Florida.

America uses a first-past-the-post voting system -- in any election, one vote is cast and the candidate/option with the most votes is the winner, even if a majority did not vote for it. Quick example: In an election between A, B, and C, A gets 35%, B gets 45%, and C gets 20%. B wins, even though 55% of the electorate voted against it. If it seems to you that the A and C supporters should have teamed up and pooled their votes rather than splitting them, congratulations -- you've just discovered why America has only two major political parties. Using political science [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duverger%27s_law it can be shown]] that plurality elections tend to lead to two-party systems, which is exactly what happened in America.

In the current Congress (2009-2010 session), both houses of Congress have a Democratic majority. As the executive and legislative branches are distinct in the US government, it is possible for one or both houses of Congress to be controlled by the opposite party than the president, and indeed this is more often than not the case -- Democrat BillClinton had a Republican congress for six years of his presidency, and GeorgeWBush worked with a Democratic Congress for the final two years of his term. While such differences can often lead to a political stalemate -- a budgetary standoff between Clinton and Republican Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich lead to a federal government shutdown in 1995 -- more often than not, compromise rules the day.

The Constitution makes no mention of political parties anywhere in the document. However, various laws have been passed (especially during the 20th century) that have given them official powers. Many of them are designed to make it very hard for a third party to acquire any real influence. Political parties are considered "private" organizations who just happen to be given government power in a number of ways. Since they are not "officially" part of the government, they are not required to adhere to the general principles of "the will of the people" or such. Understanding this will help in the next chapter on Primaries.

!!! Primaries
The majority of elections for office are a competition between two major candidates, one Republican and one Democrat. How each party picks their candidate is totally up to them. Every state has laws which regulate this practice but each law is written by the parties, so they can choose whatever they want.

To use a current example, the Democratic party recently had a primary election to decide if BarackObama or HillaryClinton would be their candidate for president. One might think that the party would simply have all members vote for who they want and which ever one gets the most votes would win. This is not how it works. The leaders of the Democratic party, who are not elected, can choose any method they want to decide who their candidate is. The current method involves having the vote of the members choose most of the "delegates" (who themselves are chosen by the party), while the remaining delegates are high ranking party members. Depending on state law and state party rules, the delegates who were voted for might or might not be required to support the candidate they were elected to.

Just to mention, the Republican party rules are pretty much the same as far as this goes. Except they make far less use of caucuses and allocate delegates by winner-takes-all for a state, not proportionally to popular vote.

As a general rule, winning a primary requires PanderingToTheBase, while winning a general election requires appealing to centrist "swing voters". Expect accusations of "flip-flopping," particularly from an incumbent opponent who has the luxury of sitting out the primary (it's considered a VeryBadSign of a politician's career if he faces a primary challenge as an incumbent).
----
<<|PoliticsTropes|>>
<<|UsefulNotes/TheUnitedStates|>>

Top