Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Trivia / HighlanderTheSource

Go To

OR

Tabs MOD

Removed: 38

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* QuoteSource: Of ArtisticLicenseSpace
Tabs MOD

Changed: 14

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* QuoteSource: Of ArtisticLicenseAstronomy

to:

* QuoteSource: Of ArtisticLicenseAstronomyArtisticLicenseSpace
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FranchiseKiller: The film's abysmal reception, on top of ''Film/HighlanderIIITheSorcerer'' and ''Film/HighlanderEndgame'' getting middling-at-best reactions and failing at the box-office, and co-producer William Panzer passing away from a head injury shortly after this film's release, put the ''Highlander'' franchise into limbo. Talks of a ContinuityReboot have circulated in the years since, but the project hasn't gone anywhere.

Changed: 14

Removed: 58

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CanonDiscontinuity: WordOfGod declared it AllJustADream.



* StillbornFranchise: ''The Source'' was supposed to be first in a trilogy of films for [[Creator/{{Syfy}} Sci-Fi Channel]]. The negative reactions killed these plans, and ultimately turned it into a FranchiseKiller.

to:

* StillbornFranchise: ''The Source'' This was supposed to be first in a trilogy of films for [[Creator/{{Syfy}} Sci-Fi Channel]]. The negative reactions killed these plans, and ultimately turned it into a FranchiseKiller.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CanonDiscontinuity: WordOfGod declared it AllJustADream.

Added: 59

Removed: 91

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CreatorBacklash: The producers declared it AllJustADream.



* DisownedAdaptation: Even the producers of the film hated it and declared it AllJustADream
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DisownedAdaptation: Even the producers of the film hated it and declared it AllJustADream

Added: 127

Changed: 137

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BTeamSequel: Russell Mulcahy was attached on the project in the early stages. It was originally supposed to be a prequel too.



* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Russell Mulcahy was attached on the project in the early stages. It was originally supposed to be a prequel too.

to:

* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Russell Mulcahy was attached on the project in the early stages. It was originally supposed to be a prequel too.----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The producers had begun planning the film all the way back in 2001 shortly after Endgame was released. One reason for the long gap was the numerous writers working on the script. The original story was developed by ''Endgame'' writer Joel Soisson (who is credited under the pseudonym Mark Bradley in the final film) but heavily re-written by writers Peter Briggs, David Abramowitz, and finally Stephen Kelvin Watkins (whose only screenplay credit is this movie).

to:

** The producers had begun planning the film all the way back in 2001 shortly after Endgame was ''Endgame ''was released. One reason for the long gap was the numerous writers working on the script. The original story was developed by ''Endgame'' writer Joel Soisson (who is credited under the pseudonym Mark Bradley in the final film) but heavily re-written by writers Peter Briggs, David Abramowitz, and finally Stephen Kelvin Watkins (whose only screenplay credit is this movie).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The producers had begun planning the film all the way back in 2001 shortly after Endgame was released. One reason for the long gap was the numerous writers working on the script. The original story was developed by Endgame writer Joel Soisson (who is credited under the pseudonym Mark Bradley in the final film) but heavily re-written by writers Peter Briggs, David Abramowitz, and finally Stephen Kelvin Watkins (whose only screenplay credit is this movie).
*** Peter Briggs even anonymously joined the online Highlander fan forums to ask questions about the series from fans. When his involvement on the film ended, Briggs revealed himself and even sends fans copies of his script if they ask for it.

to:

** The producers had begun planning the film all the way back in 2001 shortly after Endgame was released. One reason for the long gap was the numerous writers working on the script. The original story was developed by Endgame ''Endgame'' writer Joel Soisson (who is credited under the pseudonym Mark Bradley in the final film) but heavily re-written by writers Peter Briggs, David Abramowitz, and finally Stephen Kelvin Watkins (whose only screenplay credit is this movie).
*** Peter Briggs even anonymously joined the online Highlander ''Highlander'' fan forums to ask questions about the series from fans. When his involvement on the film ended, Briggs revealed himself and even sends fans copies of his script if they ask for it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* QuoteSource: Of ArtisticLicenseAstronomy

Added: 243

Changed: 240

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The producers had begun planning the film all the way back in 2001 shortly after Endgame was released. One reason for the long gap was the numerous writers working on the script. The original story was developed by Endgame writer Joel Soisson (who is credited under the pseudonym Mark Bradley in the final film) but heavily re-written by writers Peter Briggs, David Abramowitz, and finally Stephen Kelvin Watkins (whose only screenplay credit is this movie). Peter Briggs even anonymously joined the online Highlander fan forums to ask questions about the series from fans. When his involvement on the film ended, Briggs revealed himself and even sends fans copies of his script if they ask for it.

to:

** The producers had begun planning the film all the way back in 2001 shortly after Endgame was released. One reason for the long gap was the numerous writers working on the script. The original story was developed by Endgame writer Joel Soisson (who is credited under the pseudonym Mark Bradley in the final film) but heavily re-written by writers Peter Briggs, David Abramowitz, and finally Stephen Kelvin Watkins (whose only screenplay credit is this movie).
***
Peter Briggs even anonymously joined the online Highlander fan forums to ask questions about the series from fans. When his involvement on the film ended, Briggs revealed himself and even sends fans copies of his script if they ask for it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The producers had begun planning the film all the way back in 2001 shortly after Endgame was released. One reason for the long gap was the numerous writers working on the script. The original story was developed by Endgame writer Joel Soisson (who is credited under the pseudonym Mark Bradley in the final film) but heavily re-written by writers Peter Briggs, David Abramowitz, and finally Stephen Kelvin Watkins (whose only screenplay credit is this movie).

to:

** The producers had begun planning the film all the way back in 2001 shortly after Endgame was released. One reason for the long gap was the numerous writers working on the script. The original story was developed by Endgame writer Joel Soisson (who is credited under the pseudonym Mark Bradley in the final film) but heavily re-written by writers Peter Briggs, David Abramowitz, and finally Stephen Kelvin Watkins (whose only screenplay credit is this movie). Peter Briggs even anonymously joined the online Highlander fan forums to ask questions about the series from fans. When his involvement on the film ended, Briggs revealed himself and even sends fans copies of his script if they ask for it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Filmed in late 2005, but held up for over two years due to numerous re-edits, which ultimately resulted in two versions being released; the longer "Russian cut" and the eventual US cut. The latter version tones down a lot of the Guardian's over-the-top behavior and fixes some of the effects problems, though adds a narration by Anna which not only fails to clear up the various plot holes, but invalidates the entire premise of the series (the ending of the Russian cut, while somewhat confusing, was at least more open to interpretation).

to:

** Filmed in late 2005, but held up for over two years due to numerous re-edits, which ultimately resulted in two versions being released; the longer "Russian cut" and the eventual US cut. The latter version tones down a lot of the Guardian's over-the-top behavior and fixes some of the effects problems, though adds a narration by Anna which not only fails to clear up the various plot holes, but invalidates the entire premise of the series (the ending of the Russian cut, while somewhat confusing, was at least more open to interpretation). The Russian cut also has a complete soundtrack since the music was cut to pieces when scenes were shortened for the US cut.

Added: 928

Changed: 541

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DevelopmentHell: Filmed in late 2005, but held up for over two years due to numerous re-edits, which ultimately resulted in two versions being released; the longer "Russian cut" and the eventual US cut. The latter version tones down a lot of the Guardian's over-the-top behavior and fixes some of the effects problems, though adds a narration by Anna which not only fails to clear up the various plot holes, but invalidates the entire premise of the series (the ending of the Russian cut, while somewhat confusing, was at least more open to interpretation).

to:

* DevelopmentHell: DevelopmentHell:
**
Filmed in late 2005, but held up for over two years due to numerous re-edits, which ultimately resulted in two versions being released; the longer "Russian cut" and the eventual US cut. The latter version tones down a lot of the Guardian's over-the-top behavior and fixes some of the effects problems, though adds a narration by Anna which not only fails to clear up the various plot holes, but invalidates the entire premise of the series (the ending of the Russian cut, while somewhat confusing, was at least more open to interpretation).


Added DiffLines:

* FollowTheLeader: The US cut's montage of flashback clips, along with Anna's narration, is almost certainly borrowed from Creator/{{Lionsgate}}'s mainstay franchise, the ''Franchise/{{Saw}}'' series. Which might not have been a bad thing, given how poorly explained the plot is... if not for the fact that the explanation they went with retcons ''every prior entry in the franchise''.

Changed: 23

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* StillbornFranchise: ''The Source'' was supposed to be first in a trilogy of films for SciFiChannel. The negative reactions killed these plans, and ultimately turned it into a FranchiseKiller.

to:

* StillbornFranchise: ''The Source'' was supposed to be first in a trilogy of films for SciFiChannel.[[Creator/{{Syfy}} Sci-Fi Channel]]. The negative reactions killed these plans, and ultimately turned it into a FranchiseKiller.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The producers had begun planning the film all the way back in 2001 shortly after Endgame was released. One reason for the long gap was the numerous writers working on the script. The original story was developed by Endgame writer Joel Soisson (who is credited under the pseudonym Mark Bradley in the final film) but heavily re-written by writers Peter Briggs, David Abramowitz, and finally Stephen Kelvin Watkins.

to:

** The producers had begun planning the film all the way back in 2001 shortly after Endgame was released. One reason for the long gap was the numerous writers working on the script. The original story was developed by Endgame writer Joel Soisson (who is credited under the pseudonym Mark Bradley in the final film) but heavily re-written by writers Peter Briggs, David Abramowitz, and finally Stephen Kelvin Watkins.Watkins (whose only screenplay credit is this movie).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The producers had begun planning the film all the way back in 2001 shortly after Endgame was released. One reason for the long gap was the numerous writers working on the script. The original story was developed by Endgame writer Joel Soisson (who is credited under the pseudonym Mark Bradley in the final film) but heavily re-written by writers Peter Briggs, David Abramowitz, and finally Stephen Kelvin Watkins.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DevelopmentHell: Filmed in late 2005, but held up for over two years due to numerous re-edits, which ultimately resulted in two versions being released; the longer "Russian cut" and the eventual US cut. The latter version tones down a lot of the Guardian's over-the-top behavior and fixes some of the effects problems, though adds a narration by Anna which not only fails to clear up the various plot holes, but invalidates the entire premise of the series (the ending of the Russian cut, while somewhat confusing, was at least more open to interpretation).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* StillbornFranchise: ''The Source'' was supposed to be first in a trilogy of films for SciFi channel. The negative reactions killed these plans, and ultimately turned it into a FranchiseKiller.

to:

* StillbornFranchise: ''The Source'' was supposed to be first in a trilogy of films for SciFi channel.SciFiChannel. The negative reactions killed these plans, and ultimately turned it into a FranchiseKiller.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* StillbornFranchise: ''The Source'' was supposed to be first in a trilogy of films for SciFi channel. The negative reactions killed these plans, and ultimately turned it into a FranchiseKiller.
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Russell Mulcahy was attached on the project in the early stages. It was originally supposed to be a prequel too.

Top