Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Trivia / Carnosaur

Go To

OR

Added: 896

Changed: 346

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Originally the third film was not supposed to be a ''Carnosaur'' film and was instead going to be a stand-alone film that just recycled the props. In some territories such as Japan, it was still released as such under the title "Dinosaur Crisis".

to:

* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Numerous early drafts and treatments for the film existed before the final product, with some scenes and elements being cut down during production. DinoDiego explained many of these in his video essay [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrGLpaCuygg here]].
** The film originally was going to end with a last shot of the military trying to contain and clear up the virus, killing all of the virus carrying dinosaurs. Only for a reveal that a pterodactyl, unnoticed by them, managed to slip past them. The prop was created and the scene was planned out, but ultimately cut.
** The first film also initially had a ''substantially'' higher budget, with estimates and statements ranging from 5 Million to 10 Million [=USD=], and a much longer production time to finish the film. The final film? Made for less than 1 Million [=USD=], 10 weeks to create the effects and scenes, and then 18 days to shoot it all.
**
Originally the third film was not supposed to be a ''Carnosaur'' film and was instead going to be a stand-alone film that just recycled the props. In some territories such as Japan, it was still released as such under the title "Dinosaur Crisis".

Added: 459

Changed: 49

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DisownedAdaptation: Brosnan didn't care for the film adaptation and especially disliked the portrayal of the dinosaurs, including comparing it unfavorably with the ''[[Film/JurassicPark1993 other]]'' dinosaur movie that came out in 1993, but he did credit the movie with bringing more attention to his novel.

to:

* DisownedAdaptation: Brosnan didn't care for the film adaptation and especially disliked the portrayal of the dinosaurs, including comparing it unfavorably with the ''[[Film/JurassicPark1993 other]]'' dinosaur movie that came out in 1993, but he did credit the movie with bringing more attention to his novel.novel and he enjoyed parts of it in a SoBadItsGood way.
--> '''Brosnan:''' I've since seen it on video and yes, it is crap and, compared to the film of ''Jurassic Park'' the dinosaurs are laughable, but it's ''interesting'' crap. And thanks to the movie the novel has been reprinted both in the States and here in the U.K. And in fact we are having a re-launch party for the book at my drinking club this very night. The video will also be screened and I will no doubt take the lead in shouting abuse at the screen.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DisownedAdaptation: Brosnan didn't care for the film adaptation, including comparing it unfavorably with the ''[[Film/JurassicPark1993 other]]'' dinosaur movie that came out in 1993, but he did credit the movie with bringing more attention to his novel.

to:

* DisownedAdaptation: Brosnan didn't care for the film adaptation, adaptation and especially disliked the portrayal of the dinosaurs, including comparing it unfavorably with the ''[[Film/JurassicPark1993 other]]'' dinosaur movie that came out in 1993, but he did credit the movie with bringing more attention to his novel.

Added: 259

Changed: 13

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DisownedAdaptation: Brosnan didn't care for the film adaptation, including comparing it unfavorably with the ''[[Film/JurassicPark1993 other]]'' dinosaur movie that came out in 1993, but he did credit the movie with bringing more attention to his novel.



* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Originally the third film was not supposed to be a Carnosaur film and was instead going to be a stand-alone film that just recycled the props. In some territories such as Japan, it was still released as such under the title "Dinosaur Crisis".
* YouLookFamiliar: Rick Dean plays two unrelated characters in Carnosaur 2 and 3

to:

* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Originally the third film was not supposed to be a Carnosaur ''Carnosaur'' film and was instead going to be a stand-alone film that just recycled the props. In some territories such as Japan, it was still released as such under the title "Dinosaur Crisis".
* YouLookFamiliar: Rick Dean plays two unrelated characters in Carnosaur 2 ''Carnosaur 2'' and 3''3''.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The larger ''Tyrannosaurus'' animatronic was reused for the second and third films without changes, by the time of the latter film it was very much degraded from its constant use.

to:

** The larger ''Tyrannosaurus'' animatronic was reused for the second and third films without changes, by the time of the latter film it was very much degraded from its constant use.use not only from its series of origin; but also in the unrelated film ''Film/DinosaurIsland1994''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Originally the third film was not supposed to be a Carnosaur film and was instead going to be a stand-alone film that just recycled the props. In some territories such as Japan, it was still released as such under the title "Dinosaur Crisis".

to:

* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Originally the third film was not supposed to be a Carnosaur film and was instead going to be a stand-alone film that just recycled the props. In some territories such as Japan, it was still released as such under the title "Dinosaur Crisis".Crisis".
* YouLookFamiliar: Rick Dean plays two unrelated characters in Carnosaur 2 and 3
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AccidentallyCorrectWriting: Almost exclusively the novel, but Brosnan turned out to be on the ball several times.

to:

* AccidentallyCorrectWriting: AccidentallyCorrectZoology: Almost exclusively the novel, but Brosnan turned out to be on the ball several times.

Added: 592

Changed: 267

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* PropRecycling: The Marines' uniforms in ''Carnosaur 3'' are the same urban camouflage [=BDUs=] from ''Film/TheRock''. An in-series example is the Tyrannosaurus rex prop, that was reused movie to movie. By the time it was used for "Eden Formula", you can tell the prop has degraded.

to:

* PropRecycling: PropRecycling:
** The larger ''Tyrannosaurus'' animatronic was reused for the second and third films without changes, by the time of the latter film it was very much degraded from its constant use.
** The adult ''Deinonychus'' animatronic of the first film was reworked into the ''Velociraptor'' animatronic for the second and third films.
**
The Marines' uniforms in ''Carnosaur 3'' are the same urban camouflage [=BDUs=] from ''Film/TheRock''. An in-series example is the Tyrannosaurus rex prop, that was reused movie to movie. By the time it was used for "Eden Formula", you can tell the prop has degraded.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There is one case of this in the film. A brief shot of the ''Deinonychus'' as a hatchling shows it with feathers, although when it becomes an adult it is scaly. This was presumably done [[ViewersAreMorons to emphasize that]] the dinosaurs were made from chicken DNA. Nowadays, of course, it's generally agreed that ''Deinonychus'' and other small predatory dinosaurs had feathers naturally.

to:

** There is one case of this in the film. A brief shot of the ''Deinonychus'' as a hatchling shows it with feathers, although when it becomes an adult it is scaly. This was presumably done [[ViewersAreMorons to emphasize that]] the dinosaurs were made from chicken DNA.DNA (and indeed, just to drive the point home, it's shown hatching inside a truck full of chickens). Nowadays, of course, it's generally agreed that ''Deinonychus'' and other small predatory dinosaurs had feathers naturally.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There is one case of this in the film. A brief shot of the ''Deinonychus'' as a hatchling shows it with feathers, although when it becomes an adult it is scaly. This was presumably done [[ViewersAreMorons to show that]] the dinosaurs were spliced with chicken DNA. Nowadays, of course, it's generally agreed that ''Deinonychus'' and other small predatory dinosaurs had feathers naturally.

to:

** There is one case of this in the film. A brief shot of the ''Deinonychus'' as a hatchling shows it with feathers, although when it becomes an adult it is scaly. This was presumably done [[ViewersAreMorons to show emphasize that]] the dinosaurs were spliced with made from chicken DNA. Nowadays, of course, it's generally agreed that ''Deinonychus'' and other small predatory dinosaurs had feathers naturally.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''Deinocheirus'' gets a brief mention and is imagined as a super-sized dromaeosaur due it only being known from its arms and foreclaws at the time the novel was written. The real animal isn't even close to this depiction, instead being a giant, hump-backed ornithomimosaur with a duck-like bill.

to:

** ''Deinocheirus'' gets a brief mention and is imagined as by Sir Darren Penward to be a super-sized dromaeosaur due it only being known from its arms and foreclaws at the time the novel was written. The real animal isn't even close to this depiction, instead being a giant, hump-backed ornithomimosaur with a duck-like bill.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It used to be thought that some theropods could be at least partially quadrupedal, and the ''Atispinax'' is portrayed as such in the novel. This is now seen as anatomically impossible. ''Spinosaurus''-- which, despite also having the word spine in its name, is of no relation to ''Altispinax''-- was once considered to have been quadrupedal due to having short hind legs, but even that was disputed and it has been reestablished as a short-legged biped.

to:

** It used to be thought that some theropods could be at least partially quadrupedal, and the ''Atispinax'' is portrayed as such in the novel. [[note]]Ironically, it was the spinosaurid ''Baryonyx'' which was discovered in in the same pits as ''Altispinax'', and not ''Altispinax'' itself that was the poster-dino for this trend[[/note]] This is now seen as anatomically impossible. ''Spinosaurus''-- which, despite also having the word spine in its name, is of no relation to ''Altispinax''-- was once considered to have been quadrupedal due to having short hind legs, but even that was disputed and it has been reestablished as a short-legged biped.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** ''Deinocheirus'' gets a brief mention and is imagined as a super-sized dromaeosaur due it only being known from its arms and foreclaws at the time the novel was written. The real animal isn't even close to this depiction, instead being a giant, hump-backed ornithomimosaur with a duck-like bill.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It used to be thought that some theropods could be at least partially quadrupedal, and the ''Atispinax'' is portrayed as such in the novel. This is now seen as anatomically impossible. Although ''Spinosaurus'' (which, despite also having the word spine in its name, is of no relation to ''Altispinax'') was once considered to have been quadrupedal due to having short hind legs, but even that was disputed and it has been reestablished as a short-legged biped.

to:

** It used to be thought that some theropods could be at least partially quadrupedal, and the ''Atispinax'' is portrayed as such in the novel. This is now seen as anatomically impossible. Although ''Spinosaurus'' (which, ''Spinosaurus''-- which, despite also having the word spine in its name, is of no relation to ''Altispinax'') ''Altispinax''-- was once considered to have been quadrupedal due to having short hind legs, but even that was disputed and it has been reestablished as a short-legged biped.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Fan Nickname is now YMMV.


* FanNickname: "''Carnosaurs''" for the second movie, due to its plot being '''extremely''' similar to [[{{Film/Aliens}} another sequel with a plural title]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HilariousInHindsight: At one point in the novel, Sir Penward theorizes that ''Deinocheirus'', then known only from its arms, was a much larger relative of ''Deinonychus'' and muses that he'd love to clone one just to see if his hypothesis is correct. One can only imagine his disappointment since we now know exactly what the full animal [[https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/scifindr/articles/images/deinocheirus/deinocheirus.jpg looked]] like.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HilariousInHindsight: At one point in the novel, Sir Penward theorizes that ''Deinocheirus'', then known only from its arms, was a much larger relative of ''Deinonychus'' and muses that he'd love to clone one just to see if his hypothesis is correct. One can only imagine his disappointment since we now know exactly what the full animal [[https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/scifindr/articles/images/deinocheirus/deinocheirus.jpg looked]] like.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There is one case of this in the film. A brief shot of the ''Deinonychus'' as a hatchling shows it with feathers, although when it becomes an adult it is scaly. This was presumably done to show that the dinosaurs were spliced with chicken DNA. Nowadays, of course, it's generally agreed that ''Deinonychus'' and other small predatory dinosaurs had feathers naturally.

to:

** There is one case of this in the film. A brief shot of the ''Deinonychus'' as a hatchling shows it with feathers, although when it becomes an adult it is scaly. This was presumably done [[ViewersAreMorons to show that that]] the dinosaurs were spliced with chicken DNA. Nowadays, of course, it's generally agreed that ''Deinonychus'' and other small predatory dinosaurs had feathers naturally.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Sometime after the novel was written, ''Scolosaurus'' became synonymous with ''Euoplocephalus''. But then in 2013, ''Scolosaurus'' turned out to be its own valid genus after all. However, it is portrayed with the two-spiked club from outdated portraits, so it sort of cancels out.

to:

** Sometime after the novel was written, ''Scolosaurus'' became synonymous with ''Euoplocephalus''. But then in 2013, ''Scolosaurus'' turned out to be its own valid genus after all. However, it is portrayed with the a two-spiked club from outdated portraits, on its tail, so it sort of cancels out.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Sometime after the novel was written, ''Scolosaurus'' became synonymous with ''Euoplocephalus''. But then in 2013, ''Scolosaurus'' turned out to be its own valid genus after all. Although the book portrays it with a two-spiked club so it sort of cancels out.

to:

** Sometime after the novel was written, ''Scolosaurus'' became synonymous with ''Euoplocephalus''. But then in 2013, ''Scolosaurus'' turned out to be its own valid genus after all. Although the book portrays However, it is portrayed with a the two-spiked club from outdated portraits, so it sort of cancels out.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Sometime after the novel was written, ''Scolosaurus'' became synonymous with ''Euoplocephalus''. But then in 2013, ''Scolosaurus'' turned out to be its own valid genus after all. Although the book portrays it with a two-spiked club so it sort of cancels it out.

to:

** Sometime after the novel was written, ''Scolosaurus'' became synonymous with ''Euoplocephalus''. But then in 2013, ''Scolosaurus'' turned out to be its own valid genus after all. Although the book portrays it with a two-spiked club so it sort of cancels it out.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Sometime after the novel was written, ''Scolosaurus'' became synonymous with ''Euoplocephalus''. But then in 2013, ''Scolosaurus'' turned out to be its own valid genus after all.

to:

** Sometime after the novel was written, ''Scolosaurus'' became synonymous with ''Euoplocephalus''. But then in 2013, ''Scolosaurus'' turned out to be its own valid genus after all. Although the book portrays it with a two-spiked club so it sort of cancels it out.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It is now known that plesiosaurs cannot lift their necks above water. They also cannot move on land and therefore, gave birth to live young rather than laying eggs.

to:

** It is now known that plesiosaurs cannot lift their necks above water. They also cannot move on land and therefore, they gave birth to live young rather than laying eggs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It is now known that plesiosaurs cannot lift their necks above water. They also cannot move on land and therefore do not reproduce by laying eggs.

to:

** It is now known that plesiosaurs cannot lift their necks above water. They also cannot move on land and therefore do not reproduce by therefore, gave birth to live young rather than laying eggs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It is now known that plesiosaurs cannot lift their necks above water or move on land, and they do not reproduce by laying eggs.

to:

** It is now known that plesiosaurs cannot lift their necks above water or water. They also cannot move on land, land and they therefore do not reproduce by laying eggs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The novel describing the ''Tarbosaurus'' feed in a method very similar to a bird, by pinning the food down with its food and pulling strips of meat off with its front teeth in place of a beak actually lines up very nicely with 2010s hypotheses about how large theropods ate.

to:

** The novel describing the ''Tarbosaurus'' feed in a method very similar to a bird, by pinning the food down with its food foot and pulling strips of meat off with its front teeth in place of a beak actually lines up very nicely with 2010s hypotheses about how large theropods ate.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The novel describing the ''Tarbosaurus'' feed in a method very similar to a bird, by pinning the food down with its food and pulling strips of meat off with its front teeth in place of a beak actually lines up very nicely with 2010s hypotheses about how large Theropods ate.

to:

** The novel describing the ''Tarbosaurus'' feed in a method very similar to a bird, by pinning the food down with its food and pulling strips of meat off with its front teeth in place of a beak actually lines up very nicely with 2010s hypotheses about how large Theropods theropods ate.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Depicting the ''Deinonychus'' as able to climb effectively was widely considered inaccurate in the 1980s by all but a few researchers. More recent evidence in the 2000s onwards indicate all but the absolute heaviest Dromaeosaurids were actually very good climbers and juvenile ''Deinonychus'' might have been heavily arboreal to avoid predators with even the adults still able to climb effectively.

to:

** Depicting the ''Deinonychus'' as able to climb effectively was widely considered inaccurate in the 1980s by all but a few researchers. More recent evidence in the 2000s onwards indicate all but the absolute heaviest Dromaeosaurids dromaeosaurids were actually very good climbers and juvenile ''Deinonychus'' might have been heavily arboreal to avoid predators with even the adults still able to climb effectively.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It is now known that plesiosaurs do not reproduce by laying eggs (they cannot even move on land to do it) and cannot lift their necks above water.

to:

** It is now known that plesiosaurs do not reproduce by laying eggs (they cannot even move on land to do it) and cannot lift their necks above water.water or move on land, and they do not reproduce by laying eggs.

Top