Follow TV Tropes

Following

History TheReasonYouSuckSpeech / RealLife

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In 2023, after going through the regular season undefeated and winning the ACC championship game, the Florida State Seminoles are shockingly left out of the College Football Playoff. When given a chance to redeem themselves in the Orange Bowl against the two-time national champion Georgia Bulldogs, 29 players opt out of the game in protest, including 13 of their starters; as a result, a less-experienced Seminole team shows up to play and gets DESTROYED 63-3. Chris "Mad Dog" Russo of ESPN's ''First Take'' [[https://youtu.be/48w6R87kPPw?si=WIaduo3R9rXK2skl&t=181 goes NUCLEAR on the team,]] calling them a disgrace to college football for squandering an opportunity to prove that they belong in the CFP after three weeks of complaining about getting snubbed, and his copresenters agree.

to:

* In 2023, after going through the regular season undefeated and winning the ACC championship game, the Florida State Seminoles are shockingly left out of the College Football Playoff. When given a chance to redeem themselves in the Orange Bowl against the two-time national champion Georgia Bulldogs, 29 players opt out of the game in protest, game, including 13 of their starters; as a result, a less-experienced Seminole team shows up to play and gets DESTROYED 63-3. Chris "Mad Dog" Russo of ESPN's ''First Take'' [[https://youtu.be/48w6R87kPPw?si=WIaduo3R9rXK2skl&t=181 goes NUCLEAR on the team,]] calling them a disgrace to college football for squandering an opportunity to prove that they belong in the CFP after three weeks of complaining about getting snubbed, and his copresenters agree.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In 2023, after going through the regular season undefeated and winning the ACC championship game, the Florida State Seminoles are shockingly left out of the College Football Playoff. When given a chance to redeem themselves in the Orange Bowl against the two-time national champion Georgia Bulldogs, 29 players opt out of the game in protest, including 13 of their starters; as a result, a less-experienced Seminole team shows up to play and gets DESTROYED 63-3. [[https://youtu.be/48w6R87kPPw?si=WIaduo3R9rXK2skl&t=181 Chris "Mad Dog" Russo of ESPN's ''First Take'' goes NUCLEAR on the team,]] calling them a disgrace to college football for squandering an opportunity to prove that they belong in the CFP after three weeks of complaining about getting snubbed, and his copresenters agree.

to:

* In 2023, after going through the regular season undefeated and winning the ACC championship game, the Florida State Seminoles are shockingly left out of the College Football Playoff. When given a chance to redeem themselves in the Orange Bowl against the two-time national champion Georgia Bulldogs, 29 players opt out of the game in protest, including 13 of their starters; as a result, a less-experienced Seminole team shows up to play and gets DESTROYED 63-3. [[https://youtu.be/48w6R87kPPw?si=WIaduo3R9rXK2skl&t=181 Chris "Mad Dog" Russo of ESPN's ''First Take'' [[https://youtu.be/48w6R87kPPw?si=WIaduo3R9rXK2skl&t=181 goes NUCLEAR on the team,]] calling them a disgrace to college football for squandering an opportunity to prove that they belong in the CFP after three weeks of complaining about getting snubbed, and his copresenters agree.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In 2023, after going through the regular season undefeated and winning the ACC championship game, the Florida State Seminoles are shockingly left out of the College Football Playoff. When given a chance to redeem themselves in the Orange Bowl against the two-time national champion Georgia Bulldogs, 29 players opt out of the game in protest, including 13 of their starters; as a result, a less-experienced Seminole team shows up to play and gets DESTROYED 63-3. [[https://youtu.be/48w6R87kPPw?si=WIaduo3R9rXK2skl&t=181 Chris "Mad Dog" Russo of ESPN's 'First Take' goes NUCLEAR on the team,]] calling them a disgrace to college football for squandering an opportunity to prove that they belong in the CFP after three weeks of complaining about getting snubbed, and his copresenters agree.

to:

* In 2023, after going through the regular season undefeated and winning the ACC championship game, the Florida State Seminoles are shockingly left out of the College Football Playoff. When given a chance to redeem themselves in the Orange Bowl against the two-time national champion Georgia Bulldogs, 29 players opt out of the game in protest, including 13 of their starters; as a result, a less-experienced Seminole team shows up to play and gets DESTROYED 63-3. [[https://youtu.be/48w6R87kPPw?si=WIaduo3R9rXK2skl&t=181 Chris "Mad Dog" Russo of ESPN's 'First Take' ''First Take'' goes NUCLEAR on the team,]] calling them a disgrace to college football for squandering an opportunity to prove that they belong in the CFP after three weeks of complaining about getting snubbed, and his copresenters agree.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In 2023, after going through the regular season undefeated and winning the ACC championship game, the Florida State Seminoles are shockingly left out of the College Football Playoff. When given a chance to redeem themselves in the Orange Bowl against the two-time national champion Georgia Bulldogs, 29 players opt out of the game in protest, including 13 of their starters; as a result, a less-experienced Seminole team shows up to play and gets DESTROYED 63-3. [[https://youtu.be/48w6R87kPPw?si=WIaduo3R9rXK2skl&t=181 Chris "Mad Dog" Russo of ESPN's _First Take_ goes NUCLEAR on the team,]] calling them a disgrace to college football for squandering an opportunity to prove that they belong in the CFP after three weeks of complaining about getting snubbed, and his copresenters agree.

to:

* In 2023, after going through the regular season undefeated and winning the ACC championship game, the Florida State Seminoles are shockingly left out of the College Football Playoff. When given a chance to redeem themselves in the Orange Bowl against the two-time national champion Georgia Bulldogs, 29 players opt out of the game in protest, including 13 of their starters; as a result, a less-experienced Seminole team shows up to play and gets DESTROYED 63-3. [[https://youtu.be/48w6R87kPPw?si=WIaduo3R9rXK2skl&t=181 Chris "Mad Dog" Russo of ESPN's _First Take_ 'First Take' goes NUCLEAR on the team,]] calling them a disgrace to college football for squandering an opportunity to prove that they belong in the CFP after three weeks of complaining about getting snubbed, and his copresenters agree.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* In 2023, after going through the regular season undefeated and winning the ACC championship game, the Florida State Seminoles are shockingly left out of the College Football Playoff. When given a chance to redeem themselves in the Orange Bowl against the two-time national champion Georgia Bulldogs, 29 players opt out of the game in protest, including 13 of their starters; as a result, a less-experienced Seminole team shows up to play and gets DESTROYED 63-3. [[https://youtu.be/48w6R87kPPw?si=WIaduo3R9rXK2skl&t=181 Chris "Mad Dog" Russo of ESPN's _First Take_ goes NUCLEAR on the team,]] calling them a disgrace to college football for squandering an opportunity to prove that they belong in the CFP after three weeks of complaining about getting snubbed, and his copresenters agree.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
spelling/grammar fix(es)


--> I might say I feel sorry for this man, that he chose this way of life, and once choosing, there’s no going back. You cannot, and society cannot trust you living next door to him. What mercy, sir, did you show my daughter when she was begging for her life? What mercy did you show my daughter when she said give me two weeks to have my baby and then you can kill me, what mercy did you show her? In 21 years, I would like to have asked this prisoner why? He did not know my daughter, he had never seen her; not that I know of, she had only been home for 2 weeks. How can an individual, without knowing, without any abrasive feelings, go in and slice up this woman, 8 in a half months pregnant? What about her family, what about the family she was going to have, sir? Is that not a family? I saw how your feathers ruffled when you was talkin' about your family. What about my family? When will she come up for parole? When will I come up for parole? Can you tell me that? Will these seven victims and possibly more walk out of their graves if you get paroled? Yet I feel sorry for anyone who has chosen this way of life. But if you can tell me one person who wants to live next door to you, with your children, or with their children, I’ll eat my hat. You cannot be trusted.

to:

--> I might say I feel sorry for this man, that he chose this way of life, and once choosing, there’s no going back. You cannot, and society cannot trust you living next door to him. What mercy, sir, did you show my daughter when she was begging for her life? What mercy did you show my daughter when she said give “give me two weeks to have my baby and then you can kill me, me”, what mercy did you show her? In 21 years, I would like to have asked this prisoner why? He did not know my daughter, he had never seen her; not that I know of, she had only been home for 2 weeks. How can an individual, without knowing, without any abrasive feelings, go in and slice up this woman, 8 in a half months pregnant? What about her family, what family? What about the family she was going to have, sir? Is that not a family? I saw how your feathers ruffled when you was talkin' about your family. What about my family? When will she come up for parole? When will I come up for parole? Can you tell me that? Will these seven victims and possibly more walk out of their graves if you get paroled? Yet I feel sorry for anyone who has chosen this way of life. But if you can tell me one person who wants to live next door to you, with your children, or with their children, I’ll eat my hat. You cannot be trusted.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--> I get on my knees every night and pray for someone to believe in me like Daryl Morey[[note]]the general manager of the Houston Rockets during Harden's peak years[[/note]] believed in you. You wanted a certain coach, they brought in Mike D'Antoni. You wanted a certain style, they played it. You wanted Dwight Howard, they brought him in and got rid of him when you were tired of him. You wanted Chris Paul, they brought him in and got rid of him when you were tired of him. They brought in your old friend Russell Westbrook. You wanted to go to Vegas on off days, they looked away. You wanted the team to stay over so you could go out at night, they changed the schedule and it didn't work. And you know what? You said 'I'm going to break up with my wibbie. Not good enough. I see the bright lights of New York. I want to go there with my old pal Kevin Durant. It's gonna work. The big three.' And ohhh – after one year you wanted out. You realize 'Oh my gosh, I took this guy for granted, the guy who believed in me. I want back with Daryl Morey.' They traded Ben Simmons for you — how did they pull that off? And you know what, you went there and you got the partner who got the MVP. He won the MVP. And what did you say afterwards? You said, 'They didn't hand me the reins.' You're the point guard, you're holding the reins. And what did you do when you had the reins? You scored nine points in Game 7 against Boston. You blew a 3-2 series lead. So they - so they fired their coach. Not good enough. You broke up with the guy who believed in you again. You said, 'The bright lights of L.A., ''that's'' where I want to go. Let's see if that works.' Listen James, have you ever had those friends who had bad roommates? Over and over, they complained about their bad roommates. 'This guy's terrible, bad roommate here.' They never thought [unintelligible] learn they're the bad roommate. They're the problem. Hey James – ''you're the problem.'' If this doesn't work this year, in this system with this team, then you're going to go and point fingers at everybody else. You're going to go back home and you're going to start swiping right for another team and there's not going to be anybody left. Because James — you're not The Beard, you're not the system, you're the problem.


to:

--> I get on my knees every night and pray for someone to believe in me like Daryl Morey[[note]]the general manager of the Houston Rockets during Harden's peak years[[/note]] years, who would later be reunited with Harden as GM of the Philadelphia 76ers [[/note]] believed in you. You wanted a certain coach, they brought in Mike D'Antoni. You wanted a certain style, they played it. You wanted Dwight Howard, they brought him in and got rid of him when you were tired of him. You wanted Chris Paul, they brought him in and got rid of him when you were tired of him. They brought in your old friend Russell Westbrook. You wanted to go to Vegas on off days, they looked away. You wanted the team to stay over so you could go out at night, they changed the schedule and it didn't work. And you know what? You said 'I'm going to break up with my wibbie.wibbie(?). Not good enough. I see the bright lights of New York. I want to go there with my old pal Kevin Durant. It's gonna work. The big three.' And ohhh – after one year you wanted out. You realize 'Oh my gosh, I took this guy for granted, the guy who believed in me. I want back with Daryl Morey.' They traded Ben Simmons for you — how did they pull that off? And you know what, you went there and you got the partner who got the MVP. He won the MVP. And what did you say afterwards? You said, 'They didn't hand me the reins.' You're the point guard, you're holding the reins. And what did you do when you had the reins? You scored nine points in Game 7 against Boston. You blew a 3-2 series lead. So they - so they fired their coach. Not good enough. You broke up with the guy who believed in you again. You said, 'The bright lights of L.A., ''that's'' where I want to go. Let's see if that works.' Listen James, have you ever had those friends who had bad roommates? Over and over, they complained about their bad roommates. 'This guy's terrible, bad roommate here.' They never thought [unintelligible] learn they're the bad roommate. They're the problem. Hey James – ''you're the problem.'' If this doesn't work this year, in this system with this team, then you're going to go and point fingers at everybody else. You're going to go back home and you're going to start swiping right for another team and there's not going to be anybody left. Because James — you're not The Beard, you're not the system, you're the problem.

problem.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Secretary of state Henry Kissinger had ordered a bombardment of Cambodia in 1970 that exceeded ''everything dropped'' during the WWII campaign. No wonder the prime minister was pissed off.

to:

** Secretary of state Henry Kissinger UsefulNotes/HenryKissinger had ordered a bombardment of Cambodia in 1970 that exceeded ''everything dropped'' during the WWII campaign. No wonder the prime minister was pissed off.



* UsefulNotes/DavidCameron, former Prime Minister of Great Britain is quite fond of these. He doled them out like candy to Gordon Brown ("You're not a leader! You're a loser!") and allegedly gave one to Barack Obama over the phone in the wake of the BP Oil Spill.

to:

* UsefulNotes/DavidCameron, former Prime Minister of Great Britain Britain, is quite fond of these. He doled them out like candy to Gordon Brown ("You're not a leader! You're a loser!") and allegedly gave one to Barack Obama over the phone in the wake of the BP Oil Spill.



* Speaking of Congressman Weiner...he himself became the target of Andrew Breitbart's own speech when the latter ''beat him to the podium'' to take Weiner to task. Breitbart had been the man responsible for breaking the "sexting" pics scandal--and for a while, Weiner had tried his best to paint Breitbart as a liar. Needless to say, Andrew was not amused.

to:

* Speaking of Congressman Weiner... he himself became the target of Andrew Breitbart's own speech when the latter ''beat him to the podium'' to take Weiner to task. Breitbart had been the man responsible for breaking the "sexting" pics scandal--and for a while, Weiner had tried his best to paint Breitbart as a liar. Needless to say, Andrew was not amused.



-->We’ve got 100% of New South Wales that in drought right now. We’ve got a Great Barrier Reef that’s on the brink of collapse. We’ve got floods in India. We’ve got a 12-year-old girl who’s setting herself alight in Nauru, We’ve got kids who are in a catatonic state because they’ve given up hope locked away in those offshore hell holes. What’s the Liberal Party doing? Focusing on vengeance, on payback. Focusing on themselves!

to:

-->We’ve got 100% of New South Wales that in drought right now. We’ve got a Great Barrier Reef that’s on the brink of collapse. We’ve got floods in India. We’ve got a 12-year-old girl who’s setting herself alight in Nauru, We’ve got kids who are in a catatonic state because they’ve given up hope locked away in those offshore hell holes.hellholes. What’s the Liberal Party doing? Focusing on vengeance, on payback. Focusing on themselves!



* 14 members of the Congressional Black Caucus of 2012 wrote a letter to former Rep. Artur Davis for his opportunistic switch from Democrat to becoming Republican as he had turned his back on UsefulNotes/BarackObama after supporting him and called him a friend because of his loss for a Democratic Bid for Alabama Governor in 2010. [[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/28/artur-davis-convention-speech-congressional-black-caucus_n_1835520.html Here's the source.]]

to:

* 14 members of the Congressional Black Caucus of 2012 wrote a letter to former Rep. Artur Davis for his opportunistic switch from Democrat to becoming Republican as he had turned his back on UsefulNotes/BarackObama after supporting him and called him a friend because of his loss for a Democratic Bid bid for Alabama Governor governor in 2010. [[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/28/artur-davis-convention-speech-congressional-black-caucus_n_1835520.html Here's the source.]]



-->"Spaceflight will never tolerate carelessness, incapacity, and neglect. Somewhere, somehow, we screwed up. It could have been in design, build, or test. Whatever it was, we should have caught it. We were too gung ho about the schedule and we locked out all of the problems we saw each day in our work. Every element of the program was in trouble and so were we. The simulators were not working, Mission Control was behind in virtually every area, and the flight and test procedures changed daily. Nothing we did had any shelf life. Not one of us stood up and said, 'Dammit, stop!' I don't know what Thompson's committee will find as the cause, but I know what I find. We are the cause! We were not ready! We did not do our job. We were rolling the dice, hoping that things would come together by launch day, when in our hearts we knew it would take a miracle. We were pushing the schedule and betting that the Cape would slip before we did. From this day forward, Flight Control will be known by two words: 'Tough' and 'Competent.' Tough means we are forever accountable for what we do or what we fail to do. We will never again compromise our responsibilities. Every time we walk into Mission Control we will know what we stand for. Competent means we will never take anything for granted. We will never be found short in our knowledge and in our skills. Mission Control will be perfect. When you leave this meeting today you will go to your office and the first thing you will do there is to write 'Tough and Competent' on your blackboards. It will never be erased. Each day when you enter the room these words will remind you of the price paid by Grissom, White, and Chaffee. These words are the price of admission to the ranks of Mission Control."

to:

-->"Spaceflight will never tolerate carelessness, incapacity, and neglect. Somewhere, somehow, we screwed up. It could have been in design, build, or test. Whatever it was, we should have caught it. We were too gung ho about the schedule and we locked out all of the problems we saw each day in our work. Every element of the program was in trouble and so were we. The simulators were not working, Mission Control was behind in virtually every area, and the flight and test procedures changed daily. Nothing we did had any shelf life. Not one of us stood up and said, 'Dammit, stop!' I don't know what Thompson's committee will find as the cause, but I know what I find. We are the cause! We were not ready! We did not do our job. We were rolling the dice, hoping that things would come together by launch day, when in our hearts we knew it would take a miracle. We were pushing the schedule and betting that the Cape would slip before we did. From this day forward, Flight Control will be known by two words: 'Tough' and 'Competent.' 'Competent'. Tough means we are forever accountable for what we do or what we fail to do. We will never again compromise our responsibilities. Every time we walk into Mission Control we will know what we stand for. Competent means we will never take anything for granted. We will never be found short in our knowledge and in our skills. Mission Control will be perfect. When you leave this meeting today you will go to your office and the first thing you will do there is to write 'Tough and Competent' on your blackboards. It will never be erased. Each day when you enter the room these words will remind you of the price paid by Grissom, White, and Chaffee. These words are the price of admission to the ranks of Mission Control."



** There was also the Earth day special where he insulted ''Planet Earth'' for trying to kill the human race time and time again.

to:

** There was also the Earth day Day special where he insulted ''Planet Earth'' for trying to kill the human race time and time again.



* Creator/StephenColbert also stood five feet from UsefulNotes/GeorgeWBush and tore him a new one in a most humiliating but amusing way possible. What's even amusing is that Bush actually laughed too, which is something rare.

to:

* Creator/StephenColbert also stood five feet from UsefulNotes/GeorgeWBush and tore him a new one in a the most humiliating but amusing way possible. What's even amusing is that Bush actually laughed too, which is something rare.



-->“Permit me to submit the following telling counterfactual: had the Air France Airbus A-300 Flight 8969 on December 24, 1994, crashed into the Eiffel Tower in Paris, as the Groupe Armée Islamique wanted it to, I doubt very much that any — let alone many — American intellectuals would have written lengthy pieces in prestigious publications like ''The New York Times'' or ''The Washington Post'' by, say, December 26 and 27 all but exculpating this crime by invoking France’s many military and political missteps as well as its atrocities, from the Vendée to the Paris Commune, from Indochina to Algeria. Nor would they have invoked all kinds of conspiracy theories involving the French government, the Israeli Mossad or any of the other agents so often mentioned in connection with 9/11. I doubt very much that books purporting that this crime was actually planned and executed by the French president — had this terrible tragedy become reality — would have been written by American intellectuals, let alone become bestsellers in the United States. But all of this has indeed happened in Europe, particularly among social groups from whom one would least expect it by dint of their intelligence and education. Clearly, antipathy, as has often been the case, trumps either and both.”

to:

-->“Permit me to submit the following telling counterfactual: had the Air France Airbus A-300 Flight 8969 on December 24, 1994, crashed into the Eiffel Tower in Paris, as the Groupe Armée Islamique wanted it to, I doubt very much that any — let alone many — American intellectuals would have written lengthy pieces in prestigious publications like ''The New York Times'' or ''The Washington Post'' by, say, December 26 and 27 all but exculpating this crime by invoking France’s many military and political missteps as well as its atrocities, from the Vendée to the Paris Commune, from Indochina to Algeria. Nor would they have invoked all kinds of conspiracy theories involving the French government, the Israeli Mossad UsefulNotes/{{Mossad}} or any of the other agents so often mentioned in connection with 9/11. I doubt very much that books purporting that this crime was actually planned and executed by the French president — had this terrible tragedy become reality — would have been written by American intellectuals, let alone become bestsellers in the United States. But all of this has indeed happened in Europe, particularly among social groups from whom one would least expect it by dint of their intelligence and education. Clearly, antipathy, as has often been the case, trumps either and both.”



* When James Bloodworth was asked by the Huffington Post to write for them for free, he responded with some choice words on Website/{{Twitter}}.

to:

* When James Bloodworth was asked by the Huffington Post ''Huffington Post'' to write for them for free, he responded with some choice words on Website/{{Twitter}}.



Huffington Post contacted me saying it sounded interesting. They asked me to write something...\\

to:

Huffington Post ''Huffington Post'' contacted me saying it sounded interesting. They asked me to write something...\\



* UsefulNotes/{{Cleveland}} was for a long time the ButtMonkey of American sports -- if the city's 52-year championship drought between the Cleveland Browns' 1964 NFL championship and the Cleveland Cavaliers' 2016 NBA championship isn't quite the longest in American sports it has certainly been full of pain (see the Cavs' [[PointyHairedBoss Ted Stepien era]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Right_88 Red Right 88]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Drive The Drive]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fumble The Fumble]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Shot The Shot]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Browns_relocation_controversy The Move]], the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1997_World_Series#Game_7 '97 World Series]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_American_League_Championship_Series the '07 ALCS]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Decision_(TV_special) The Decision]]). Of the three, the Browns (American football) are arguably the most pitiful and inept, as while the Indians (baseball) and Cavaliers (basketball) have at least had some measure of success in the 21st century, the Browns have been consistently awful since their re-introduction into the NFL in 1999 (only 2 playoff appearances and 3 winning seasons as of the 2020 season). The city's fans (especially Browns fans) have mostly taken their misery in stride, but after a 30-12 loss to Houston in 2011, comedian and long-time Browns fan Mike Polk[[note]]he who made the "Hastily Made Cleveland Tourism Videos", "One Semester of Spanish -- Love Song", ''and'' "I'm a Stupid Cat!" viral videos[[/note]] [[https://youtu.be/tRBDMMVctu8 ripped into the team('s home stadium)]] with a mix of anger and humor that has spawned a MemeticMutation.

to:

* UsefulNotes/{{Cleveland}} was for a long time the ButtMonkey of American sports -- if the city's 52-year championship drought between the Cleveland Browns' 1964 NFL championship and the Cleveland Cavaliers' 2016 NBA championship isn't quite the longest in American sports it has certainly been full of pain (see the Cavs' [[PointyHairedBoss Ted Stepien era]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Right_88 Red Right 88]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Drive The Drive]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fumble The Fumble]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Shot The Shot]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Browns_relocation_controversy The Move]], the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1997_World_Series#Game_7 '97 World Series]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_American_League_Championship_Series the '07 ALCS]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Decision_(TV_special) The Decision]]). Of the three, the Browns (American football) are arguably the most pitiful and inept, as while the Indians (baseball) Guardians (baseball; formerly the Indians) and Cavaliers (basketball) have at least had some measure of success in the 21st century, the Browns have been consistently awful since their re-introduction reintroduction into the NFL in 1999 (only 2 playoff appearances and 3 winning seasons as of the 2020 2022 season). The city's fans (especially Browns fans) have mostly taken their misery in stride, but after a 30-12 loss to Houston in 2011, comedian and long-time longtime Browns fan Mike Polk[[note]]he who made the "Hastily Made Cleveland Tourism Videos", "One Semester of Spanish -- Love Song", ''and'' "I'm a Stupid Cat!" viral videos[[/note]] [[https://youtu.be/tRBDMMVctu8 ripped into the team('s home stadium)]] with a mix of anger and humor that has spawned a MemeticMutation.



** Making this episode HilariousInHindsight: Louisville joined Duke in the Atlantic Coast Conference in July 2014; however, they don't play every year in football. From 2014 through 2022, they were in separate divisions in that sport, and were not designated annual opponents; in the ACC's post-2023 divisionless model, they are not guaranteed annual opponents.

to:

** Making this episode HilariousInHindsight: Louisville joined Duke in the Atlantic Coast Conference in July 2014; however, they don't play every year in football. From 2014 through 2022, they were in separate divisions in that sport, and were not designated annual opponents; in the ACC's post-2023 current divisionless model, they are not guaranteed annual opponents.

Added: 2558

Changed: 38

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
James Harden got obliterated during an NBA telecast last night.


** Making this episode HilariousInHindsight: Louisville joined Duke in the Atlantic Coast Conference in July 2014; however, they don't play every year in football. From 2014 through 2022, they were in separate divisions in that sport, and were not designated annual opponents; in the ACC's post-2023 divisionless model, neither school is one of the other's three guaranteed annual opponents.

to:

** Making this episode HilariousInHindsight: Louisville joined Duke in the Atlantic Coast Conference in July 2014; however, they don't play every year in football. From 2014 through 2022, they were in separate divisions in that sport, and were not designated annual opponents; in the ACC's post-2023 divisionless model, neither school is one of the other's three they are not guaranteed annual opponents.


Added DiffLines:

* On November 10, 2023, Brian Dameris, the Dallas Mavericks announcer for Bally Sports Southwest, [[https://www.tiktok.com/@yahoosports/video/7300083460410985758 obliterated James Harden]] in a pregame segment leading up to the Mavericks' game against the Los Angeles Clippers:

--> I get on my knees every night and pray for someone to believe in me like Daryl Morey[[note]]the general manager of the Houston Rockets during Harden's peak years[[/note]] believed in you. You wanted a certain coach, they brought in Mike D'Antoni. You wanted a certain style, they played it. You wanted Dwight Howard, they brought him in and got rid of him when you were tired of him. You wanted Chris Paul, they brought him in and got rid of him when you were tired of him. They brought in your old friend Russell Westbrook. You wanted to go to Vegas on off days, they looked away. You wanted the team to stay over so you could go out at night, they changed the schedule and it didn't work. And you know what? You said 'I'm going to break up with my wibbie. Not good enough. I see the bright lights of New York. I want to go there with my old pal Kevin Durant. It's gonna work. The big three.' And ohhh – after one year you wanted out. You realize 'Oh my gosh, I took this guy for granted, the guy who believed in me. I want back with Daryl Morey.' They traded Ben Simmons for you — how did they pull that off? And you know what, you went there and you got the partner who got the MVP. He won the MVP. And what did you say afterwards? You said, 'They didn't hand me the reins.' You're the point guard, you're holding the reins. And what did you do when you had the reins? You scored nine points in Game 7 against Boston. You blew a 3-2 series lead. So they - so they fired their coach. Not good enough. You broke up with the guy who believed in you again. You said, 'The bright lights of L.A., ''that's'' where I want to go. Let's see if that works.' Listen James, have you ever had those friends who had bad roommates? Over and over, they complained about their bad roommates. 'This guy's terrible, bad roommate here.' They never thought [unintelligible] learn they're the bad roommate. They're the problem. Hey James – ''you're the problem.'' If this doesn't work this year, in this system with this team, then you're going to go and point fingers at everybody else. You're going to go back home and you're going to start swiping right for another team and there's not going to be anybody left. Because James — you're not The Beard, you're not the system, you're the problem.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Grammar.


-->The defendant, Lucy Letby, has refused to attend court for this sentence hearing. Accordingly, I have to sentence her in her absence. I shall deliver the sentencing remarks as if she was present to hear them and I direct that she is provided with a transcript of my remarks and copies of the Victim Personal Statements read to the court. Lucy Letby, over a period of almost 13 months between June 2015 and June 2016, when in your mid-20’s and employed as a neo-natal nurse at the Countess of Chester Hospital in Chester with specialist training in intensive care, you murdered 7 babies and attempted to murder 6 others, in the case of one of them trying on separate occasions two weeks apart to murder her. You are now to be sentenced for your crimes. I order payment of the statutory surcharge in the appropriate amount. You acted in a way that was completely contrary to the normal human instincts of nurturing and caring for babies and in gross breach of the trust that all citizens place in those who work in the medical and caring professions. The babies you harmed were born prematurely and some were at risk of not surviving, but in each case you deliberately harmed them intending to kill them. In your evidence you said that ‘hurting a baby is completely against everything that being a nurse is’, as, indeed, it should be. You also claimed you never did anything that was meant to hurt a baby and only ever did your best to care for them. That was but one of the many lies you were found to have told in this case. There is no doubt that you are intelligent and, outwardly, were a very conscientious, hard working, knowledgeable, confident and professional nurse, which enabled you repeatedly to harm babies on the unit without arousing suspicion for some time. You prided yourself in your competence. Your fellow neonatal nurses spoke very highly of you, and several of them became your close friends. Having started as a Band 5 nurse at the Countess of Chester in 2012, you became a mentor to student nurses and, in the Spring of 2015, gained the qualification that enabled you to care for the sickest babies on the unit or those requiring the most intensive care. You relished being in the intensive care nursery. Your messages to colleagues revealed an interest in babies that were on or were coming to the unit who had uncommon medical conditions. The methods you employed to carry out your murderous intent were only revealed by the later detailed investigation into the events of and surrounding the collapses and deaths of the babies which commenced in 2018. There was pre-meditation, calculation and cunning in your actions. You specifically targeted twins and, latterly, triplets. Some babies were healthy, others had medical issues of which you were aware. The great majority of your victims suffered acute pain as a result of what you did to them. They all fought for survival; some, sadly, struggled in vain and died. You used a number of different ways to try to kill them, thereby misleading clinicians into believing the collapses had, or might have had a natural cause or were a consequence of a developing medical condition. You took opportunities to harm babies when staff were on breaks or away from babies. On some occasions you falsified records to indicate there were signs of a deterioration before a collapse occurred. You knew that the last thing anyone working in the unit would or did think was that someone caring for the babies was deliberately harming them. As the number of unexpected and unexplained collapses and deaths escalated senior doctors started to ‘think the unthinkable’ and consider the possibility that someone was, in fact, deliberately harming the babies and you were identified as the common factor. You had a detached enthusiasm for the resuscitations and what followed. You endeavoured to impress colleagues and clinicians and sought reassurance from them as to your competence and skills, and would message others to the effect that no-one was at fault. On occasions, your cruelty and callousness was revealed by making inappropriate remarks to some of the grieving parents at the time of or in the immediate aftermath of a death. When the homes of both you and your parents were searched, confidential documents relating to babies, including handover and resuscitation sheets and notes and blood gas readings were found, and there were entries in a diary recording relevant events. Handover sheets relating to all but the first 4 of the babies had been taken from the unit and kept by you. I am satisfied you started to keep these documents after those initial offences in June 2015 as morbid records of the dreadful events surrounding the collapses of your victims and what you had done to them. You had a fascination with the babies and their families, which extended to making repeated searches on Facebook for their parents, sometimes immediately following the events and, on occasions, much later. A piece of paper with dense writing on both sides, setting out your thoughts and feelings, was found in the first search of your home in 2018. Amongst the phrases you wrote were ‘the world is better off without me’ and ‘I am evil I did this’. The impact of your crimes has been immense, as disclosed by the deeply moving personal statements that have been read to the court this morning. The lives of new-born or relatively new-born babies were ended almost as soon as they began and lifelong harm has been caused, all in horrific circumstances. Loving parents have been robbed of their cherished children and others have to live with the physical and mental consequences of your actions. Siblings have been deprived of brothers and sisters. You have caused deep psychological trauma, brought enduring grief and feelings of guilt, caused strains in relationships and disruption to the lives of all the families of all your victims. It is no part of my function to reach conclusions as to the underlying reason or reasons for your actions. Nor could I, for they are known only to you. I must pass appropriate sentences according to law, addressing the seriousness of your offences, the facts of which I now describe briefly. On the evening of 8th June 2015 you murdered ‘A’. He died just over 24 hours after he was born, suddenly and unexpectedly collapsing shortly after you took over as his designated nurse at the start of the evening shift. He was in a nursery with his twin sister, ‘B’. Although he was born prematurely, he had been extremely stable. He died of air embolus as a result of you administering a bolus of air into his venous system which blocked off the blood supply to his heart and lungs. In common with all nurses, you knew from your training the dangers caused by air getting into the venous system and that air embolus was very rarely encountered in clinical practice. You took part in the attempts to resuscitate ‘A’ and claimed you found the process of taking his footprints and handprints, as well as photographs of him after his death, to be quite a nice thing to do for the baby and you saw it as a way of giving parents memories. In evidence, you sought to blame others for his collapse. The following day you searched for ‘A’s mother on Facebook and then, on the ensuing night shift, at shortly after midnight on 10th June, you attempted to murder his sister, ‘B’, by injecting air into her venous system via a long line through which she was receiving nutrition. Fortunately, she was able to be resuscitated and survived. Four days after ‘B’s collapse, in the early hours of 14th June, ‘C’ collapsed and died in the intensive care nursery. He had been born 4 days earlier at 30 weeks gestation in good condition, but was vulnerable; he had a lung infection which was being treated by antibiotics. However, his breathing stabilised. He was being fed by a naso-gastric tube. You messaged a colleague saying you ‘needed to throw yourself back in and take an ITU baby soon’. On that night shift of 13-14th June you were the designated nurse for 2 babies in another nursery. ‘C’ was started on trophic, that is tiny, feeds that night. You were at the side of his incubator when he stopped breathing and his oxygen saturations were very low as a result of you having deliberately infused an excessive amount of air down his naso-gastric tube. Attempts to resuscitate ‘C’ failed and he died some hours later in his parents’ arms. Before he passed away you made an insensitive and inappropriate, but revealing comment to them about them having said their goodbyes and to put him in a ventilated basket. Understandably they reacted to this. Just over a week later, in the early hours of Monday 22nd June, ‘D’, who had been born 36 hours earlier, died in the intensive care nursery. You will have been aware that she was being treated for an infection and were the designated nurse for 2 other babies in that nursery on that night shift. You decided to kill her and administered air into her intravenously, causing her to die from air embolus. You were involved in her resuscitation and, in your messaging with other nurses after ‘D’s death, you described how upsetting it was and how distraught her parents were and referred to thinking an element of fate was involved. Three days after ‘D’ died, you searched for her parents on Facebook and, over 3 months later, on 3rd October you made 2 more searches for her father. Over a month passed before you killed another baby. Again, it was a twin who was selected, ‘E’. He and his brother, ‘F’, were born on 29th July. ‘E’ died in the early hours of 4th August. During the shift that night you were the designated nurse for both ‘E’ and ‘F’. ‘E’ died of air embolus and there was damage to his upper gastro- intestinal tract caused by trauma of some kind inflicted by you, which resulted in significant blood loss. The bleeding started earlier in the shift and was seen by his mother; she was very concerned and you sought to reassure her. The circumstances of the attempted resuscitation and his death were harrowing, with profuse bleeding. At the time the clinicians thought he may have died of necrotising enterocolitis and no post mortem was undertaken. You commented in messages to colleagues that he had a massive haemorrhage and it could have happened to anyone. On the following nightshift, the 4th – 5th August, you turned your attention to ‘F’ and poisoned him by adding manufactured insulin to his intravenous infusions of total parenteral feed. Only very small volumes of insulin needed to be added to the half litre bags of feed; it was not noticeable in the bag, nor would it be apparent that any was missing from the insulin bottle. You infused a bag that was hung that shift and several other stock bags. As a result, when bags were changed, ‘F’ continued to have dangerously low blood sugar levels despite increasing infusions of dextrose. It was only when a bag that had not had insulin added was hung that his levels recovered and he was no longer at risk of the consequences of hypoglaecemia of brain damage and potential death. ‘F’ recovered but has severe learning difficulties. No doubt you were reassured that no-one suspected that insulin had been added and, with this knowledge, you went on to repeat this method of attempting to kill another twin, ‘I’, some 8 months later. Again, you made Facebook searches. On 6th August and 14th September you searched for his mother and you searched for both parents in October. In September you made two attempts to kill ‘G’. She was a very premature baby who was born in Arrowe Park Hospital on 31st May at only 23 weeks and 6 days’ gestation. Although on the margin of survival, she did survive. By 13th August she was stable and was transferred to the Countess of Chester, where the general trend of improvement continued. The 7th September was her 100th day of life; nurses had planned a small celebration, including the display of a banner. On the nightshift of 6th – 7th, you deliberately injected milk and air into ‘G’s stomach down the naso-gastric tube shortly after her designated nurse had fed her, causing her to projectile vomit; her alarms sounded, her heart rate and saturation levels dropped and she required breathing assistance. You were nearby and assisted, and later sought to blame a colleague for potentially over-feeding. In messaging prior to ‘G’ being transferred back to Arrowe Park in the early hours of 8th September, you referred to her being a ‘high risk baby’. Five days after ‘G’s return to the Countess of Chester on 16th September, you made a further attempt to kill her on 21st September by over-feeding her, causing her to projectile vomit again and stop breathing and her saturations to drop. ‘G’ suffered a severe and profound injury to her brain from the first event on 7th September, which may have been added to by your actions on 21st September, and from which she will not recover. She requires constant nursing care and attention and will require surgery and support throughout her life. Just over a month later, on 23rd October, you murdered ‘H’. She had been born at Arrowe Park Hospital on 7th August and had been at the Countess of Chester from 18th August, apart from two short periods in September and October. When at the Countess of Chester she suffered a series of sudden, unexpected and unexplained episodes. On 30th September you infused a large quantity of air down her nasogastric tube into her stomach and bowel, thereby interfering with her breathing, reducing her oxygen saturations and heart rate and causing her to vomit and require oxygen under pressure. It is also likely that, in the early hours of 13thOctober, you infused air into her venous system. The following night she collapsed again but recovered with breathing support and was transferred to Arrowe Park for two days. Six days after her return, on the night of 22nd-23rd October, she suffered her final collapse, crying out in severe pain as a result of air embolus after you had injected air into her venous system. She, too, died in her parents’ arms. Not only was it devastating for ‘H’s family, it was also deeply upsetting for the nursing and medical staff, who had known and cared for ‘H’ for some time and had fought to save her. Again you searched for her mother on Facebook. In early April 2016, you administered insulin to ‘I’ and injected air into the venous system of his twin brother, ‘J’, repeating what you had done eight months earlier to the twins ‘E’ and ‘F’. They had been born on 8th April. You added insulin to the dextrose bag that was set up for ‘I’ within two hours of his birth and to several other bags that were later hung. On 9th April, when ‘I’ was hypoglycemic, you injected air into ‘J’s venous system causing him to suffer a profound apnoeic episode and cardio-respiratory arrest. It took just under 30 minutes to resuscitate him. You were present throughout. A piece of paper towel on which details of the drug administration notes had been noted during the emergency and a blood gas print out which you had retrieved from the confidential waste were found at your home after your arrest, and you also took home handover sheets relating to ‘J’. You made a note of the event in your diary. J suffered irreversible brain damage as a result of his cardio respiratory collapse and, over time, he may well deviate from his peers in relation to attainment and cognitive or motor function. On the 3rd June you attempted to murder ‘K’. He had been born on 2nd June. His mother is haemophiliac. This interested you. When his designated nurse went on a break in the early hours of the night after he was born you inflicted some painful trauma to the oropharynx area causing him to scream, bleed and profoundly desaturate. Fortunately, he survived but could has suffered the consequences of the trauma to his throat. Almost a week later on 21st June 2016 ‘XY’ gave birth to identical triplet boys. Although on holiday at the time, you were communicating with colleagues about the triplets and said you felt most at home in the intensive care nursery. On your first day back at work on 23rd June you were the designated nurse for ‘L’ and ‘M’, who, together with their brother, ‘O’, were all in the intensive care nursery. That afternoon ‘L’ suffered a series of sudden and unexpected collapses as a result of you administering air down his naso-gastric tube as well as into his venous system and you inflicted trauma to his liver causing significant bleeding. The horror of the consequences of your actions and the desperate attempts to resuscitate him and save his life, sadly to no avail, were vividly described by clinicians and his father. The following day you murdered his older brother, ‘M’. You forced air down his naso-gastric tube into his stomach and bowel, and inflicted trauma to his liver but not damaging it as severely as you had in ‘L’s case. The air caused his diaphragm to splint and he collapsed. His life could not be saved. His father remembered him struggling for his life like his brother. ‘O’ was removed to another hospital and to safety. In messages to a friend and colleague, when investigations into the unexpected collapses and deaths on consecutive days were under way, you referred to the risk of air embolus and your having submitted a Datix report, which you did in a totally unrelated case on 1st July, referring to one of the lumens through which intravenous medication was being administered via an umbilical venous catheter being open. The cruelty and calculation of your actions were truly horrific. After these last collapses and deaths, you were suspended from nursing duties but pursued complaints of being treated unfairly. When your home was later searched, as well as your 2016 diary, which contained references to long days on 23rd, 24th and 25th June and to ‘L’ and ‘M’, there were handover sheets over that period with resuscitation notes written on the back. All, I have no doubt, being records that you kept to remind you of the details of the consequences of what you had done to those children. For the offence of murder, the sentence is fixed by law and is imprisonment for life. You are now 33 years of age and were over 21 when you committed the offences. Pursuant to the relevant prevailing statutory regime, by having regard to Schedule 21 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003, I have to determine whether the seriousness of the offences of murder, individually or in combination, is so exceptionally high that I should not make a minimum term order and you should spend the rest of your life in prison. For offences of attempted murder, whole life sentences of imprisonment are reserved for wholly exceptional cases. Over a period of just under 13 months you killed 7 fragile babies and attempted to kill 6 others. Some of your victims were only a day or a few days old. All were extremely vulnerable. They were in a hospital where others were striving to provide them with dedicated medical and nursing care. By their nature and number, such murders and attempted murders by a neo-natal nurse entrusted to care for them are offences of very exceptional seriousness. The damaging impact of your actions on others working at that hospital, including those who numbered you as a friend, betraying their trust and creating upset and suspicion, as well as eroding confidence in clinicians and nurses generally, aggravates their seriousness. This was a cruel, calculated and cynical campaign of child murder involving the smallest and most vulnerable of children, knowing that your actions were causing significant physical suffering and would cause untold mental suffering. You created situations so that collapses or causes of collapses would not be obvious or associated with you; you removed and retained confidential records of events relating to your crimes and checked up on bereaved parents. There was a deep malevolence bordering on sadism in your actions. During the course of this trial you have coldly denied any responsibility for your wrongdoing and sought to attribute some fault to others. You have shown no remorse. There are no mitigating factors. In their totality, the offences of murder and attempted murder were of exceptionally high seriousness and just punishment, according to law, requires a whole life order. Lucy Letby, on each of the 7 offences of murder and the 7 offences of attempted murder I sentence you to imprisonment for life. Because the seriousness of your offences is exceptionally high I direct that the early release provisions do not apply. The order of the court, therefore, is a whole life order on each and every offence and you will spend the rest of your life in prison.

to:

-->The defendant, Lucy Letby, has refused to attend court for this sentence hearing. Accordingly, I have to sentence her in her absence. I shall deliver the sentencing remarks as if she was present to hear them and I direct that she is provided with a transcript of my remarks and copies of the Victim Personal Statements read to the court. Lucy Letby, over a period of almost 13 months between June 2015 and June 2016, when in your mid-20’s and employed as a neo-natal nurse at the Countess of Chester Hospital in Chester with specialist training in intensive care, you murdered 7 babies and attempted to murder 6 others, in the case of one of them trying on separate occasions two weeks apart to murder her. You are now to be sentenced for your crimes. I order payment of the statutory surcharge in the appropriate amount. You acted in a way that was completely contrary to the normal human instincts of nurturing and caring for babies and in gross breach of the trust that all citizens place in those who work in the medical and caring professions. The babies you harmed were born prematurely and some were at risk of not surviving, but in each case you deliberately harmed them intending to kill them. In your evidence you said that ‘hurting a baby is completely against everything that being a nurse is’, as, indeed, it should be. You also claimed you never did anything that was meant to hurt a baby and only ever did your best to care for them. That was but one of the many lies you were found to have told in this case. There is no doubt that you are intelligent and, outwardly, were a very conscientious, hard working, knowledgeable, confident and professional nurse, which enabled you repeatedly to harm babies on the unit without arousing suspicion for some time. You prided yourself in your competence. Your fellow neonatal nurses spoke very highly of you, and several of them became your close friends. Having started as a Band 5 nurse at the Countess of Chester in 2012, you became a mentor to student nurses and, in the Spring of 2015, gained the qualification that enabled you to care for the sickest babies on the unit or those requiring the most intensive care. You relished being in the intensive care nursery. Your messages to colleagues revealed an interest in babies that were on or were coming to the unit who had uncommon medical conditions. The methods you employed to carry out your murderous intent were only revealed by the later detailed investigation into the events of and surrounding the collapses and deaths of the babies which commenced in 2018. There was pre-meditation, calculation and cunning in your actions. You specifically targeted twins and, latterly, triplets. Some babies were healthy, others had medical issues of which you were aware. The great majority of your victims suffered acute pain as a result of what you did to them. They all fought for survival; some, sadly, struggled in vain and died. You used a number of different ways to try to kill them, thereby misleading clinicians into believing the collapses had, or might have had a natural cause or were a consequence of a developing medical condition. You took opportunities to harm babies when staff were on breaks or away from babies. On some occasions you falsified records to indicate there were signs of a deterioration before a collapse occurred. You knew that the last thing anyone working in the unit would or did think was that someone caring for the babies was deliberately harming them. As the number of unexpected and unexplained collapses and deaths escalated senior doctors started to ‘think the unthinkable’ and consider the possibility that someone was, in fact, deliberately harming the babies and you were identified as the common factor. You had a detached enthusiasm for the resuscitations and what followed. You endeavoured to impress colleagues and clinicians and sought reassurance from them as to your competence and skills, and would message others to the effect that no-one was at fault. On occasions, your cruelty and callousness was revealed by making inappropriate remarks to some of the grieving parents at the time of or in the immediate aftermath of a death. When the homes of both you and your parents were searched, confidential documents relating to babies, including handover and resuscitation sheets and notes and blood gas readings were found, and there were entries in a diary recording relevant events. Handover sheets relating to all but the first 4 of the babies had been taken from the unit and kept by you. I am satisfied you started to keep these documents after those initial offences in June 2015 as morbid records of the dreadful events surrounding the collapses of your victims and what you had done to them. You had a fascination with the babies and their families, which extended to making repeated searches on Facebook for their parents, sometimes immediately following the events and, on occasions, much later. A piece of paper with dense writing on both sides, setting out your thoughts and feelings, was found in the first search of your home in 2018. Amongst the phrases you wrote were ‘the world is better off without me’ and ‘I am evil I did this’. The impact of your crimes has been immense, as disclosed by the deeply moving personal statements that have been read to the court this morning. The lives of new-born or relatively new-born babies were ended almost as soon as they began and lifelong harm has been caused, all in horrific circumstances. Loving parents have been robbed of their cherished children and others have to live with the physical and mental consequences of your actions. Siblings have been deprived of brothers and sisters. You have caused deep psychological trauma, brought enduring grief and feelings of guilt, caused strains in relationships and disruption to the lives of all the families of all your victims. It is no part of my function to reach conclusions as to the underlying reason or reasons for your actions. Nor could I, for they are known only to you. I must pass appropriate sentences according to law, addressing the seriousness of your offences, the facts of which I now describe briefly. On the evening of 8th June 2015 you murdered ‘A’. He died just over 24 hours after he was born, suddenly and unexpectedly collapsing shortly after you took over as his designated nurse at the start of the evening shift. He was in a nursery with his twin sister, ‘B’. Although he was born prematurely, he had been extremely stable. He died of air embolus as a result of you administering a bolus of air into his venous system which blocked off the blood supply to his heart and lungs. In common with all nurses, you knew from your training the dangers caused by air getting into the venous system and that air embolus was very rarely encountered in clinical practice. You took part in the attempts to resuscitate ‘A’ and claimed you found the process of taking his footprints and handprints, as well as photographs of him after his death, to be quite a nice thing to do for the baby and you saw it as a way of giving parents memories. In evidence, you sought to blame others for his collapse. The following day you searched for ‘A’s mother on Facebook and then, on the ensuing night shift, at shortly after midnight on 10th June, you attempted to murder his sister, ‘B’, by injecting air into her venous system via a long line through which she was receiving nutrition. Fortunately, she was able to be resuscitated and survived. Four days after ‘B’s collapse, in the early hours of 14th June, ‘C’ collapsed and died in the intensive care nursery. He had been born 4 days earlier at 30 weeks gestation in good condition, but was vulnerable; he had a lung infection which was being treated by antibiotics. However, his breathing stabilised. He was being fed by a naso-gastric tube. You messaged a colleague saying you ‘needed to throw yourself back in and take an ITU baby soon’. On that night shift of 13-14th June you were the designated nurse for 2 babies in another nursery. ‘C’ was started on trophic, that is tiny, feeds that night. You were at the side of his incubator when he stopped breathing and his oxygen saturations were very low as a result of you having deliberately infused an excessive amount of air down his naso-gastric tube. Attempts to resuscitate ‘C’ failed and he died some hours later in his parents’ arms. Before he passed away you made an insensitive and inappropriate, but revealing comment to them about them having said their goodbyes and to put him in a ventilated basket. Understandably they reacted to this. Just over a week later, in the early hours of Monday 22nd June, ‘D’, who had been born 36 hours earlier, died in the intensive care nursery. You will have been aware that she was being treated for an infection and were the designated nurse for 2 other babies in that nursery on that night shift. You decided to kill her and administered air into her intravenously, causing her to die from air embolus. You were involved in her resuscitation and, in your messaging with other nurses after ‘D’s death, you described how upsetting it was and how distraught her parents were and referred to thinking an element of fate was involved. Three days after ‘D’ died, you searched for her parents on Facebook and, over 3 months later, on 3rd October you made 2 more searches for her father. Over a month passed before you killed another baby. Again, it was a twin who was selected, ‘E’. He and his brother, ‘F’, were born on 29th July. ‘E’ died in the early hours of 4th August. During the shift that night you were the designated nurse for both ‘E’ and ‘F’. ‘E’ died of air embolus and there was damage to his upper gastro- intestinal tract caused by trauma of some kind inflicted by you, which resulted in significant blood loss. The bleeding started earlier in the shift and was seen by his mother; she was very concerned and you sought to reassure her. The circumstances of the attempted resuscitation and his death were harrowing, with profuse bleeding. At the time the clinicians thought he may have died of necrotising enterocolitis and no post mortem was undertaken. You commented in messages to colleagues that he had a massive haemorrhage and it could have happened to anyone. On the following nightshift, the 4th – 5th August, you turned your attention to ‘F’ and poisoned him by adding manufactured insulin to his intravenous infusions of total parenteral feed. Only very small volumes of insulin needed to be added to the half litre bags of feed; it was not noticeable in the bag, nor would it be apparent that any was missing from the insulin bottle. You infused a bag that was hung that shift and several other stock bags. As a result, when bags were changed, ‘F’ continued to have dangerously low blood sugar levels despite increasing infusions of dextrose. It was only when a bag that had not had insulin added was hung that his levels recovered and he was no longer at risk of the consequences of hypoglaecemia of brain damage and potential death. ‘F’ recovered but has severe learning difficulties. No doubt you were reassured that no-one suspected that insulin had been added and, with this knowledge, you went on to repeat this method of attempting to kill another twin, ‘I’, some 8 months later. Again, you made Facebook searches. On 6th August and 14th September you searched for his mother and you searched for both parents in October. In September you made two attempts to kill ‘G’. She was a very premature baby who was born in Arrowe Park Hospital on 31st May at only 23 weeks and 6 days’ gestation. Although on the margin of survival, she did survive. By 13th August she was stable and was transferred to the Countess of Chester, where the general trend of improvement continued. The 7th September was her 100th day of life; nurses had planned a small celebration, including the display of a banner. On the nightshift of 6th – 7th, you deliberately injected milk and air into ‘G’s stomach down the naso-gastric tube shortly after her designated nurse had fed her, causing her to projectile vomit; her alarms sounded, her heart rate and saturation levels dropped and she required breathing assistance. You were nearby and assisted, and later sought to blame a colleague for potentially over-feeding. In messaging prior to ‘G’ being transferred back to Arrowe Park in the early hours of 8th September, you referred to her being a ‘high risk baby’. Five days after ‘G’s return to the Countess of Chester on 16th September, you made a further attempt to kill her on 21st September by over-feeding her, causing her to projectile vomit again and stop breathing and her saturations to drop. ‘G’ suffered a severe and profound injury to her brain from the first event on 7th September, which may have been added to by your actions on 21st September, and from which she will not recover. She requires constant nursing care and attention and will require surgery and support throughout her life. Just over a month later, on 23rd October, you murdered ‘H’. She had been born at Arrowe Park Hospital on 7th August and had been at the Countess of Chester from 18th August, apart from two short periods in September and October. When at the Countess of Chester she suffered a series of sudden, unexpected and unexplained episodes. On 30th September you infused a large quantity of air down her nasogastric tube into her stomach and bowel, thereby interfering with her breathing, reducing her oxygen saturations and heart rate and causing her to vomit and require oxygen under pressure. It is also likely that, in the early hours of 13thOctober, you infused air into her venous system. The following night she collapsed again but recovered with breathing support and was transferred to Arrowe Park for two days. Six days after her return, on the night of 22nd-23rd October, she suffered her final collapse, crying out in severe pain as a result of air embolus after you had injected air into her venous system. She, too, died in her parents’ arms. Not only was it devastating for ‘H’s family, it was also deeply upsetting for the nursing and medical staff, who had known and cared for ‘H’ for some time and had fought to save her. Again you searched for her mother on Facebook. In early April 2016, you administered insulin to ‘I’ and injected air into the venous system of his twin brother, ‘J’, repeating what you had done eight months earlier to the twins ‘E’ and ‘F’. They had been born on 8th April. You added insulin to the dextrose bag that was set up for ‘I’ within two hours of his birth and to several other bags that were later hung. On 9th April, when ‘I’ was hypoglycemic, you injected air into ‘J’s venous system causing him to suffer a profound apnoeic episode and cardio-respiratory arrest. It took just under 30 minutes to resuscitate him. You were present throughout. A piece of paper towel on which details of the drug administration notes had been noted during the emergency and a blood gas print out which you had retrieved from the confidential waste were found at your home after your arrest, and you also took home handover sheets relating to ‘J’. You made a note of the event in your diary. J suffered irreversible brain damage as a result of his cardio respiratory collapse and, over time, he may well deviate from his peers in relation to attainment and cognitive or motor function. On the 3rd June you attempted to murder ‘K’. He had been born on 2nd June. His mother is haemophiliac. This interested you. When his designated nurse went on a break in the early hours of the night after he was born you inflicted some painful trauma to the oropharynx area causing him to scream, bleed and profoundly desaturate. Fortunately, he survived but could has have suffered the consequences of the trauma to his throat. Almost a week later on 21st June 2016 ‘XY’ gave birth to identical triplet boys. Although on holiday at the time, you were communicating with colleagues about the triplets and said you felt most at home in the intensive care nursery. On your first day back at work on 23rd June you were the designated nurse for ‘L’ and ‘M’, who, together with their brother, ‘O’, were all in the intensive care nursery. That afternoon ‘L’ suffered a series of sudden and unexpected collapses as a result of you administering air down his naso-gastric tube as well as into his venous system and you inflicted trauma to his liver causing significant bleeding. The horror of the consequences of your actions and the desperate attempts to resuscitate him and save his life, sadly to no avail, were vividly described by clinicians and his father. The following day you murdered his older brother, ‘M’. You forced air down his naso-gastric tube into his stomach and bowel, and inflicted trauma to his liver but not damaging it as severely as you had in ‘L’s case. The air caused his diaphragm to splint and he collapsed. His life could not be saved. His father remembered him struggling for his life like his brother. ‘O’ was removed to another hospital and to safety. In messages to a friend and colleague, when investigations into the unexpected collapses and deaths on consecutive days were under way, you referred to the risk of air embolus and your having submitted a Datix report, which you did in a totally unrelated case on 1st July, referring to one of the lumens through which intravenous medication was being administered via an umbilical venous catheter being open. The cruelty and calculation of your actions were truly horrific. After these last collapses and deaths, you were suspended from nursing duties but pursued complaints of being treated unfairly. When your home was later searched, as well as your 2016 diary, which contained references to long days on 23rd, 24th and 25th June and to ‘L’ and ‘M’, there were handover sheets over that period with resuscitation notes written on the back. All, I have no doubt, being records that you kept to remind you of the details of the consequences of what you had done to those children. For the offence of murder, the sentence is fixed by law and is imprisonment for life. You are now 33 years of age and were over 21 when you committed the offences. Pursuant to the relevant prevailing statutory regime, by having regard to Schedule 21 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003, I have to determine whether the seriousness of the offences of murder, individually or in combination, is so exceptionally high that I should not make a minimum term order and you should spend the rest of your life in prison. For offences of attempted murder, whole life sentences of imprisonment are reserved for wholly exceptional cases. Over a period of just under 13 months you killed 7 fragile babies and attempted to kill 6 others. Some of your victims were only a day or a few days old. All were extremely vulnerable. They were in a hospital where others were striving to provide them with dedicated medical and nursing care. By their nature and number, such murders and attempted murders by a neo-natal nurse entrusted to care for them are offences of very exceptional seriousness. The damaging impact of your actions on others working at that hospital, including those who numbered you as a friend, betraying their trust and creating upset and suspicion, as well as eroding confidence in clinicians and nurses generally, aggravates their seriousness. This was a cruel, calculated and cynical campaign of child murder involving the smallest and most vulnerable of children, knowing that your actions were causing significant physical suffering and would cause untold mental suffering. You created situations so that collapses or causes of collapses would not be obvious or associated with you; you removed and retained confidential records of events relating to your crimes and checked up on bereaved parents. There was a deep malevolence bordering on sadism in your actions. During the course of this trial you have coldly denied any responsibility for your wrongdoing and sought to attribute some fault to others. You have shown no remorse. There are no mitigating factors. In their totality, the offences of murder and attempted murder were of exceptionally high seriousness and just punishment, according to law, requires a whole life order. Lucy Letby, on each of the 7 offences of murder and the 7 offences of attempted murder I sentence you to imprisonment for life. Because the seriousness of your offences is exceptionally high I direct that the early release provisions do not apply. The order of the court, therefore, is a whole life order on each and every offence and you will spend the rest of your life in prison.

Changed: 4

Removed: 337

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[Administrivia/EditReasonsAndWhyYouShouldUseThem Edit Reasons]] on Website/ThisVeryWiki are meant to provide constructive criticism when editing an existing passage or deleting it. However, invoking this {{trope}} (made even worse when done with a complaining tone) when providing an Edit Reason is just as frowned upon as a bad edit.



* In 2004, at the height of his career, Creator/DaveChappelle was doing a stand-up show in Sacramento when some of the audience kept interrupting him shouting the catchphrase "I’m Rick James, Bitch" from [[Series/TheDaveChappelleShow his self-titled show]]. After leaving the stage, he said:

to:

* In 2004, at the height of his career, Creator/DaveChappelle was doing a stand-up show in Sacramento when some of the audience kept interrupting him shouting the catchphrase "I’m Rick James, Bitch" from [[Series/TheDaveChappelleShow [[Series/ChappellesShow his self-titled show]]. After leaving the stage, he said:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** She also gave one to sex trafficker Andrew Tate after he bragged about owning 33 cars. "Yes please enlighten me. Email at smalldickenergy@getalife.com." Even better, when Tate tried to respond to her, he ended up accidentally giving away his location to the authorities.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* When British serial killer nurse Lucy Letby was sentenced for [[WouldHurtAChild murdering babies,]] the judge calmly tore into her for her crimes.
-->The defendant, Lucy Letby, has refused to attend court for this sentence hearing. Accordingly, I have to sentence her in her absence. I shall deliver the sentencing remarks as if she was present to hear them and I direct that she is provided with a transcript of my remarks and copies of the Victim Personal Statements read to the court. Lucy Letby, over a period of almost 13 months between June 2015 and June 2016, when in your mid-20’s and employed as a neo-natal nurse at the Countess of Chester Hospital in Chester with specialist training in intensive care, you murdered 7 babies and attempted to murder 6 others, in the case of one of them trying on separate occasions two weeks apart to murder her. You are now to be sentenced for your crimes. I order payment of the statutory surcharge in the appropriate amount. You acted in a way that was completely contrary to the normal human instincts of nurturing and caring for babies and in gross breach of the trust that all citizens place in those who work in the medical and caring professions. The babies you harmed were born prematurely and some were at risk of not surviving, but in each case you deliberately harmed them intending to kill them. In your evidence you said that ‘hurting a baby is completely against everything that being a nurse is’, as, indeed, it should be. You also claimed you never did anything that was meant to hurt a baby and only ever did your best to care for them. That was but one of the many lies you were found to have told in this case. There is no doubt that you are intelligent and, outwardly, were a very conscientious, hard working, knowledgeable, confident and professional nurse, which enabled you repeatedly to harm babies on the unit without arousing suspicion for some time. You prided yourself in your competence. Your fellow neonatal nurses spoke very highly of you, and several of them became your close friends. Having started as a Band 5 nurse at the Countess of Chester in 2012, you became a mentor to student nurses and, in the Spring of 2015, gained the qualification that enabled you to care for the sickest babies on the unit or those requiring the most intensive care. You relished being in the intensive care nursery. Your messages to colleagues revealed an interest in babies that were on or were coming to the unit who had uncommon medical conditions. The methods you employed to carry out your murderous intent were only revealed by the later detailed investigation into the events of and surrounding the collapses and deaths of the babies which commenced in 2018. There was pre-meditation, calculation and cunning in your actions. You specifically targeted twins and, latterly, triplets. Some babies were healthy, others had medical issues of which you were aware. The great majority of your victims suffered acute pain as a result of what you did to them. They all fought for survival; some, sadly, struggled in vain and died. You used a number of different ways to try to kill them, thereby misleading clinicians into believing the collapses had, or might have had a natural cause or were a consequence of a developing medical condition. You took opportunities to harm babies when staff were on breaks or away from babies. On some occasions you falsified records to indicate there were signs of a deterioration before a collapse occurred. You knew that the last thing anyone working in the unit would or did think was that someone caring for the babies was deliberately harming them. As the number of unexpected and unexplained collapses and deaths escalated senior doctors started to ‘think the unthinkable’ and consider the possibility that someone was, in fact, deliberately harming the babies and you were identified as the common factor. You had a detached enthusiasm for the resuscitations and what followed. You endeavoured to impress colleagues and clinicians and sought reassurance from them as to your competence and skills, and would message others to the effect that no-one was at fault. On occasions, your cruelty and callousness was revealed by making inappropriate remarks to some of the grieving parents at the time of or in the immediate aftermath of a death. When the homes of both you and your parents were searched, confidential documents relating to babies, including handover and resuscitation sheets and notes and blood gas readings were found, and there were entries in a diary recording relevant events. Handover sheets relating to all but the first 4 of the babies had been taken from the unit and kept by you. I am satisfied you started to keep these documents after those initial offences in June 2015 as morbid records of the dreadful events surrounding the collapses of your victims and what you had done to them. You had a fascination with the babies and their families, which extended to making repeated searches on Facebook for their parents, sometimes immediately following the events and, on occasions, much later. A piece of paper with dense writing on both sides, setting out your thoughts and feelings, was found in the first search of your home in 2018. Amongst the phrases you wrote were ‘the world is better off without me’ and ‘I am evil I did this’. The impact of your crimes has been immense, as disclosed by the deeply moving personal statements that have been read to the court this morning. The lives of new-born or relatively new-born babies were ended almost as soon as they began and lifelong harm has been caused, all in horrific circumstances. Loving parents have been robbed of their cherished children and others have to live with the physical and mental consequences of your actions. Siblings have been deprived of brothers and sisters. You have caused deep psychological trauma, brought enduring grief and feelings of guilt, caused strains in relationships and disruption to the lives of all the families of all your victims. It is no part of my function to reach conclusions as to the underlying reason or reasons for your actions. Nor could I, for they are known only to you. I must pass appropriate sentences according to law, addressing the seriousness of your offences, the facts of which I now describe briefly. On the evening of 8th June 2015 you murdered ‘A’. He died just over 24 hours after he was born, suddenly and unexpectedly collapsing shortly after you took over as his designated nurse at the start of the evening shift. He was in a nursery with his twin sister, ‘B’. Although he was born prematurely, he had been extremely stable. He died of air embolus as a result of you administering a bolus of air into his venous system which blocked off the blood supply to his heart and lungs. In common with all nurses, you knew from your training the dangers caused by air getting into the venous system and that air embolus was very rarely encountered in clinical practice. You took part in the attempts to resuscitate ‘A’ and claimed you found the process of taking his footprints and handprints, as well as photographs of him after his death, to be quite a nice thing to do for the baby and you saw it as a way of giving parents memories. In evidence, you sought to blame others for his collapse. The following day you searched for ‘A’s mother on Facebook and then, on the ensuing night shift, at shortly after midnight on 10th June, you attempted to murder his sister, ‘B’, by injecting air into her venous system via a long line through which she was receiving nutrition. Fortunately, she was able to be resuscitated and survived. Four days after ‘B’s collapse, in the early hours of 14th June, ‘C’ collapsed and died in the intensive care nursery. He had been born 4 days earlier at 30 weeks gestation in good condition, but was vulnerable; he had a lung infection which was being treated by antibiotics. However, his breathing stabilised. He was being fed by a naso-gastric tube. You messaged a colleague saying you ‘needed to throw yourself back in and take an ITU baby soon’. On that night shift of 13-14th June you were the designated nurse for 2 babies in another nursery. ‘C’ was started on trophic, that is tiny, feeds that night. You were at the side of his incubator when he stopped breathing and his oxygen saturations were very low as a result of you having deliberately infused an excessive amount of air down his naso-gastric tube. Attempts to resuscitate ‘C’ failed and he died some hours later in his parents’ arms. Before he passed away you made an insensitive and inappropriate, but revealing comment to them about them having said their goodbyes and to put him in a ventilated basket. Understandably they reacted to this. Just over a week later, in the early hours of Monday 22nd June, ‘D’, who had been born 36 hours earlier, died in the intensive care nursery. You will have been aware that she was being treated for an infection and were the designated nurse for 2 other babies in that nursery on that night shift. You decided to kill her and administered air into her intravenously, causing her to die from air embolus. You were involved in her resuscitation and, in your messaging with other nurses after ‘D’s death, you described how upsetting it was and how distraught her parents were and referred to thinking an element of fate was involved. Three days after ‘D’ died, you searched for her parents on Facebook and, over 3 months later, on 3rd October you made 2 more searches for her father. Over a month passed before you killed another baby. Again, it was a twin who was selected, ‘E’. He and his brother, ‘F’, were born on 29th July. ‘E’ died in the early hours of 4th August. During the shift that night you were the designated nurse for both ‘E’ and ‘F’. ‘E’ died of air embolus and there was damage to his upper gastro- intestinal tract caused by trauma of some kind inflicted by you, which resulted in significant blood loss. The bleeding started earlier in the shift and was seen by his mother; she was very concerned and you sought to reassure her. The circumstances of the attempted resuscitation and his death were harrowing, with profuse bleeding. At the time the clinicians thought he may have died of necrotising enterocolitis and no post mortem was undertaken. You commented in messages to colleagues that he had a massive haemorrhage and it could have happened to anyone. On the following nightshift, the 4th – 5th August, you turned your attention to ‘F’ and poisoned him by adding manufactured insulin to his intravenous infusions of total parenteral feed. Only very small volumes of insulin needed to be added to the half litre bags of feed; it was not noticeable in the bag, nor would it be apparent that any was missing from the insulin bottle. You infused a bag that was hung that shift and several other stock bags. As a result, when bags were changed, ‘F’ continued to have dangerously low blood sugar levels despite increasing infusions of dextrose. It was only when a bag that had not had insulin added was hung that his levels recovered and he was no longer at risk of the consequences of hypoglaecemia of brain damage and potential death. ‘F’ recovered but has severe learning difficulties. No doubt you were reassured that no-one suspected that insulin had been added and, with this knowledge, you went on to repeat this method of attempting to kill another twin, ‘I’, some 8 months later. Again, you made Facebook searches. On 6th August and 14th September you searched for his mother and you searched for both parents in October. In September you made two attempts to kill ‘G’. She was a very premature baby who was born in Arrowe Park Hospital on 31st May at only 23 weeks and 6 days’ gestation. Although on the margin of survival, she did survive. By 13th August she was stable and was transferred to the Countess of Chester, where the general trend of improvement continued. The 7th September was her 100th day of life; nurses had planned a small celebration, including the display of a banner. On the nightshift of 6th – 7th, you deliberately injected milk and air into ‘G’s stomach down the naso-gastric tube shortly after her designated nurse had fed her, causing her to projectile vomit; her alarms sounded, her heart rate and saturation levels dropped and she required breathing assistance. You were nearby and assisted, and later sought to blame a colleague for potentially over-feeding. In messaging prior to ‘G’ being transferred back to Arrowe Park in the early hours of 8th September, you referred to her being a ‘high risk baby’. Five days after ‘G’s return to the Countess of Chester on 16th September, you made a further attempt to kill her on 21st September by over-feeding her, causing her to projectile vomit again and stop breathing and her saturations to drop. ‘G’ suffered a severe and profound injury to her brain from the first event on 7th September, which may have been added to by your actions on 21st September, and from which she will not recover. She requires constant nursing care and attention and will require surgery and support throughout her life. Just over a month later, on 23rd October, you murdered ‘H’. She had been born at Arrowe Park Hospital on 7th August and had been at the Countess of Chester from 18th August, apart from two short periods in September and October. When at the Countess of Chester she suffered a series of sudden, unexpected and unexplained episodes. On 30th September you infused a large quantity of air down her nasogastric tube into her stomach and bowel, thereby interfering with her breathing, reducing her oxygen saturations and heart rate and causing her to vomit and require oxygen under pressure. It is also likely that, in the early hours of 13thOctober, you infused air into her venous system. The following night she collapsed again but recovered with breathing support and was transferred to Arrowe Park for two days. Six days after her return, on the night of 22nd-23rd October, she suffered her final collapse, crying out in severe pain as a result of air embolus after you had injected air into her venous system. She, too, died in her parents’ arms. Not only was it devastating for ‘H’s family, it was also deeply upsetting for the nursing and medical staff, who had known and cared for ‘H’ for some time and had fought to save her. Again you searched for her mother on Facebook. In early April 2016, you administered insulin to ‘I’ and injected air into the venous system of his twin brother, ‘J’, repeating what you had done eight months earlier to the twins ‘E’ and ‘F’. They had been born on 8th April. You added insulin to the dextrose bag that was set up for ‘I’ within two hours of his birth and to several other bags that were later hung. On 9th April, when ‘I’ was hypoglycemic, you injected air into ‘J’s venous system causing him to suffer a profound apnoeic episode and cardio-respiratory arrest. It took just under 30 minutes to resuscitate him. You were present throughout. A piece of paper towel on which details of the drug administration notes had been noted during the emergency and a blood gas print out which you had retrieved from the confidential waste were found at your home after your arrest, and you also took home handover sheets relating to ‘J’. You made a note of the event in your diary. J suffered irreversible brain damage as a result of his cardio respiratory collapse and, over time, he may well deviate from his peers in relation to attainment and cognitive or motor function. On the 3rd June you attempted to murder ‘K’. He had been born on 2nd June. His mother is haemophiliac. This interested you. When his designated nurse went on a break in the early hours of the night after he was born you inflicted some painful trauma to the oropharynx area causing him to scream, bleed and profoundly desaturate. Fortunately, he survived but could has suffered the consequences of the trauma to his throat. Almost a week later on 21st June 2016 ‘XY’ gave birth to identical triplet boys. Although on holiday at the time, you were communicating with colleagues about the triplets and said you felt most at home in the intensive care nursery. On your first day back at work on 23rd June you were the designated nurse for ‘L’ and ‘M’, who, together with their brother, ‘O’, were all in the intensive care nursery. That afternoon ‘L’ suffered a series of sudden and unexpected collapses as a result of you administering air down his naso-gastric tube as well as into his venous system and you inflicted trauma to his liver causing significant bleeding. The horror of the consequences of your actions and the desperate attempts to resuscitate him and save his life, sadly to no avail, were vividly described by clinicians and his father. The following day you murdered his older brother, ‘M’. You forced air down his naso-gastric tube into his stomach and bowel, and inflicted trauma to his liver but not damaging it as severely as you had in ‘L’s case. The air caused his diaphragm to splint and he collapsed. His life could not be saved. His father remembered him struggling for his life like his brother. ‘O’ was removed to another hospital and to safety. In messages to a friend and colleague, when investigations into the unexpected collapses and deaths on consecutive days were under way, you referred to the risk of air embolus and your having submitted a Datix report, which you did in a totally unrelated case on 1st July, referring to one of the lumens through which intravenous medication was being administered via an umbilical venous catheter being open. The cruelty and calculation of your actions were truly horrific. After these last collapses and deaths, you were suspended from nursing duties but pursued complaints of being treated unfairly. When your home was later searched, as well as your 2016 diary, which contained references to long days on 23rd, 24th and 25th June and to ‘L’ and ‘M’, there were handover sheets over that period with resuscitation notes written on the back. All, I have no doubt, being records that you kept to remind you of the details of the consequences of what you had done to those children. For the offence of murder, the sentence is fixed by law and is imprisonment for life. You are now 33 years of age and were over 21 when you committed the offences. Pursuant to the relevant prevailing statutory regime, by having regard to Schedule 21 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003, I have to determine whether the seriousness of the offences of murder, individually or in combination, is so exceptionally high that I should not make a minimum term order and you should spend the rest of your life in prison. For offences of attempted murder, whole life sentences of imprisonment are reserved for wholly exceptional cases. Over a period of just under 13 months you killed 7 fragile babies and attempted to kill 6 others. Some of your victims were only a day or a few days old. All were extremely vulnerable. They were in a hospital where others were striving to provide them with dedicated medical and nursing care. By their nature and number, such murders and attempted murders by a neo-natal nurse entrusted to care for them are offences of very exceptional seriousness. The damaging impact of your actions on others working at that hospital, including those who numbered you as a friend, betraying their trust and creating upset and suspicion, as well as eroding confidence in clinicians and nurses generally, aggravates their seriousness. This was a cruel, calculated and cynical campaign of child murder involving the smallest and most vulnerable of children, knowing that your actions were causing significant physical suffering and would cause untold mental suffering. You created situations so that collapses or causes of collapses would not be obvious or associated with you; you removed and retained confidential records of events relating to your crimes and checked up on bereaved parents. There was a deep malevolence bordering on sadism in your actions. During the course of this trial you have coldly denied any responsibility for your wrongdoing and sought to attribute some fault to others. You have shown no remorse. There are no mitigating factors. In their totality, the offences of murder and attempted murder were of exceptionally high seriousness and just punishment, according to law, requires a whole life order. Lucy Letby, on each of the 7 offences of murder and the 7 offences of attempted murder I sentence you to imprisonment for life. Because the seriousness of your offences is exceptionally high I direct that the early release provisions do not apply. The order of the court, therefore, is a whole life order on each and every offence and you will spend the rest of your life in prison.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->'''Polk:''' Hey, Browns! Mike Polk, season ticket-holder. Killer game in Houston today. well thank God we built [the Cleveland Browns Stadium]. What a blessing for the community! You are wasting valuable space on our majestic shoreline. And what do we get out of it from you? Ten miserable games a year, including two preseason games that I have to pay for, and one shitty Kenny Chesney concert! Do you understand that it's actually statistically harder for a team to bethis consistently bad than it is for them to occasionally, accidentally, be good? The probability is staggering! Did you happen to see that Packers-Chargers game today? It's like they're playing a different sport than you are! and here's what you have to understand: we don't even expect you to be good! We just want you to be watchable! Uou have any idea how low our expectations are? We don't expect you to win the Super Bowl! We just want you to look better than a division III high school team! And listen, I know that there are way more important things in life in football. But you are supposed to be our pleasant distraction from those things! But all we do is pay you money to put us in a bad mood every week. ''({{Beat}})'' YOU ARE A FACTORY OF SADNESS! ... [[SelfDeprecation I'll see you Sunday.]]

to:

-->'''Polk:''' Hey, Browns! Mike Polk, season ticket-holder. Killer game in Houston today. well Well, thank God we built [the Cleveland Browns Stadium]. What a blessing for the community! You are wasting valuable space on our majestic shoreline. And what do we get out of it from you? Ten miserable games a year, including two preseason games that I have to pay for, and one shitty Kenny Chesney concert! Do you understand that it's actually statistically harder for a team to bethis be this consistently bad than it is for them to occasionally, accidentally, be good? The probability is staggering! Did you happen to see that Packers-Chargers game today? It's like they're playing a different sport than you are! and here's what you have to understand: we don't even expect you to be good! We just want you to be watchable! Uou You have any idea how low our expectations are? We don't expect you to win the Super Bowl! We just want you to look better than a division III high school team! And listen, I know that there are way more important things in life in than football. But you are supposed to be our pleasant distraction from those things! But all we do is pay you money to put us in a bad mood every week. ''({{Beat}})'' YOU ARE A FACTORY OF SADNESS! ... [[SelfDeprecation I'll see you Sunday.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UsefulNotes/{{Cleveland}} was for a long time the ButtMonkey of American sports -- if the city's 52-year championship drought between the Cleveland Browns' 1964 NFL championship and the Cleveland Cavaliers' 2016 NBA championship isn't quite the longest in American sports it has certainly been full of pain (see the Cavs' [[PointyHairedBoss Ted Stepien era]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Right_88 Red Right 88]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Drive The Drive]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fumble The Fumble]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Shot The Shot]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Browns_relocation_controversy The Move]], the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1997_World_Series#Game_7 '97 World Series]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_American_League_Championship_Series the '07 ALCS]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Decision_(TV_special) The Decision]]). Of the three, the Browns (American football) are arguably the most pitiful and inept, as while the Indians (baseball) and Cavaliers (basketball) have at least had some measure of success in the 21st century, the Browns have been consistently awful since their re-introduction into the NFL in 1999 (only 2 playoff appearances and 3 winning seasons as of the 2020 season). The city's fans (especially Browns fans) have mostly taken their misery in stride, but after a 30-12 loss to Houston in 2011, comedian and long-time Browns fan Mike Polk[[note]]he who made the "Hastily Made Cleveland Tourism Videos", "One Semester of Spanish -- Love Song", ''and'' "I'm a Stupid Cat!" viral videos[[/note]] [[https://youtu.be/tRBDMMVctu8 ripped into the team('s home stadium)]] with a mix of anger and humor that has spawned a MemeticMutation:
-->'''Polk:''' ''YOU ARE A FACTORY OF SADNESS!''... [[SelfDeprecation I'll see you Sunday.]]

to:

* UsefulNotes/{{Cleveland}} was for a long time the ButtMonkey of American sports -- if the city's 52-year championship drought between the Cleveland Browns' 1964 NFL championship and the Cleveland Cavaliers' 2016 NBA championship isn't quite the longest in American sports it has certainly been full of pain (see the Cavs' [[PointyHairedBoss Ted Stepien era]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Right_88 Red Right 88]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Drive The Drive]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fumble The Fumble]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Shot The Shot]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Browns_relocation_controversy The Move]], the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1997_World_Series#Game_7 '97 World Series]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_American_League_Championship_Series the '07 ALCS]], [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Decision_(TV_special) The Decision]]). Of the three, the Browns (American football) are arguably the most pitiful and inept, as while the Indians (baseball) and Cavaliers (basketball) have at least had some measure of success in the 21st century, the Browns have been consistently awful since their re-introduction into the NFL in 1999 (only 2 playoff appearances and 3 winning seasons as of the 2020 season). The city's fans (especially Browns fans) have mostly taken their misery in stride, but after a 30-12 loss to Houston in 2011, comedian and long-time Browns fan Mike Polk[[note]]he who made the "Hastily Made Cleveland Tourism Videos", "One Semester of Spanish -- Love Song", ''and'' "I'm a Stupid Cat!" viral videos[[/note]] [[https://youtu.be/tRBDMMVctu8 ripped into the team('s home stadium)]] with a mix of anger and humor that has spawned a MemeticMutation:
MemeticMutation.
-->'''Polk:''' ''YOU Hey, Browns! Mike Polk, season ticket-holder. Killer game in Houston today. well thank God we built [the Cleveland Browns Stadium]. What a blessing for the community! You are wasting valuable space on our majestic shoreline. And what do we get out of it from you? Ten miserable games a year, including two preseason games that I have to pay for, and one shitty Kenny Chesney concert! Do you understand that it's actually statistically harder for a team to bethis consistently bad than it is for them to occasionally, accidentally, be good? The probability is staggering! Did you happen to see that Packers-Chargers game today? It's like they're playing a different sport than you are! and here's what you have to understand: we don't even expect you to be good! We just want you to be watchable! Uou have any idea how low our expectations are? We don't expect you to win the Super Bowl! We just want you to look better than a division III high school team! And listen, I know that there are way more important things in life in football. But you are supposed to be our pleasant distraction from those things! But all we do is pay you money to put us in a bad mood every week. ''({{Beat}})'' YOU ARE A FACTORY OF SADNESS!''...SADNESS! ... [[SelfDeprecation I'll see you Sunday.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[Creator/FoxNewsChannel Fox News]] commentator Andy Levy [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hU1mXS0KgqA gave one of these]] to Music/ChrisBrown and his fans regarding his [[DomesticAbuse abuse]] of Music/{{Rihanna}}, in the form of a [[BackhandedApology fake apology]]:

to:

* [[Creator/FoxNewsChannel [[Creator/{{Fox}} Fox News]] commentator Andy Levy [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hU1mXS0KgqA gave one of these]] to Music/ChrisBrown and his fans regarding his [[DomesticAbuse abuse]] of Music/{{Rihanna}}, in the form of a [[BackhandedApology fake apology]]:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This is all wrong. I shouldn't be up here. I should be back in school on the other side of the ocean. Yet you all come to us young people for hope. How dare you!\\

to:

This is all wrong. I shouldn't be up here. I should be back in school on the other side of the ocean. Yet you all come to us young people for hope. [[WhoDares How dare you!\\you!]]\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--> Sir, there's no place in this city, there's no place in this country, indeed there's no place in this world for those who enslave others, those who sexually assault others or those who brutalize others. For more than 10 years you have preyed upon three young women. You subjected them to harsh and violent conduct. You felt you were dominating them. But you were incorrect. You could not take away their dignity. Although they suffered terribly, Miss Knight, Miss De Jesus and Miss Berry did not give up hope. They have persevered. In fact, they've prevailed. These remarkable women again have their freedom, which is the most precious aspect of being an American. Mr. Castro, you forfeited that right. You've now become a number with the Department of the Rehabilitation and Correction. You'll be confined for the remainder of your days.

to:

--> Sir, there's no place in this city, there's no place in this country, indeed there's no place in this world for those who enslave others, those who sexually assault others or those who brutalize others. For more than 10 years you have preyed upon three young women. You subjected them to harsh and violent conduct. You felt you were dominating them. But you were incorrect. You could not take away their dignity. Although they suffered terribly, Miss Knight, Miss De Jesus [=DeJesus=] and Miss Berry did not give up hope. They have persevered. In fact, they've prevailed. These remarkable women again have their freedom, which is the most precious aspect of being an American. Mr. Castro, you forfeited that right. You've now become a number with the Department of the Rehabilitation and Correction. You'll be confined for the remainder of your days.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Justice Cameron Mander gave this to the terrorist who murdered 51 Muslims in Christchurch, New Zealand. You can read the entirety of Justice Mander's remarks [[https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/assets/cases/R-v-Tarrant-sentencing-remarks-20200827.pdf here]].

to:

* Justice Cameron Mander gave this to the white supremacist terrorist Brenton Tarrant who murdered 51 Muslims in Christchurch, New Zealand. You can read the entirety of Justice Mander's remarks [[https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/assets/cases/R-v-Tarrant-sentencing-remarks-20200827.pdf here]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator/BillBurr had an absolutely [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNnkDjMVJqE epic speech to Philadelphia]][[note]]The written transcript of which is [[https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/2018/07/06/bill-burr-the-philadelphia-incident-2006-transcript/ here]].[[/note]]after they spent the day booing every act before him back in 2006. The speech is a 12-minute rant deconstructing everything about the city, from its sports teams, perceived racism, the fact that ''Franchise/{{Rocky}}'' is their hero over actual people (most notably long-time boxing champion [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Frazier Joe Frazier]]) and anything else even remotely connected to the city (including cheesesteaks, Subway, the Ben Franklin bridge, and the Liberty Bell), all amid ClusterFBomb and any other foul word you can think of. Even better is when he repeatedly tells them how much longer his act is, promising that the rest of it is just going to be more of the same. Eventually, [[RefugeInAudacity some of the crowd starts cheering]].

to:

* Creator/BillBurr had an absolutely [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNnkDjMVJqE epic speech to Philadelphia]][[note]]The written transcript of which is [[https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/2018/07/06/bill-burr-the-philadelphia-incident-2006-transcript/ here]].[[/note]]after [[/note]] after they spent the day booing every act before him back in 2006. The speech is a 12-minute rant deconstructing everything about the city, from its sports teams, perceived racism, the fact that ''Franchise/{{Rocky}}'' is their hero over actual people (most notably long-time boxing champion [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Frazier Joe Frazier]]) and anything else even remotely connected to the city (including cheesesteaks, Subway, the Ben Franklin bridge, and the Liberty Bell), all amid ClusterFBomb and any other foul word you can think of. Even better is when he repeatedly tells them how much longer his act is, promising that the rest of it is just going to be more of the same. Eventually, [[RefugeInAudacity some of the crowd starts cheering]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
fixed broken link


* While it is over the top [[http://gawker.com/5994974/the-most-deranged-sorority-girl-email-you-will-ever-read.html A sorority girl emailed her sorority sisters stating the faults she finds with them.]][[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTqj3P1rmdw.html even comes with a parody video]]

to:

* While it is over the top [[http://gawker.com/5994974/the-most-deranged-sorority-girl-email-you-will-ever-read.html [[https://deadspin.com/we-fucking-suck-so-far-a-sorority-girl-lashes-out-at-476159462 A sorority girl emailed her sorority sisters stating the faults she finds with them.]][[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTqj3P1rmdw.html even comes with a parody video]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esVAquInvgg Judge Mario F. Mattei]] gave an epic and deserving one to Michael Sykes, who is responsible for murdering two of his girlfriend's children - Ziana Cutler and Maliyah Sykes - in a rampage inside the Ramada Inn Hotel on February 16th, 2016.

to:

* [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esVAquInvgg Judge Mario F. Mattei]] gave an epic and deserving one to Michael Sykes, who is responsible for murdering two of his girlfriend's children - Ziana Cutler and [[OffingTheOffspring Maliyah Sykes Sykes]] - in a rampage inside the Ramada Inn Hotel on February 16th, 2016.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Another reason he blamed them.


** The implication for the blame can be summed up in one term: ''Slave trade!''

to:

** The implication for the blame can be summed up in one term: ''Slave trade!''trade!'' Also monarchy, since every European power without exception was ruled by kings back then.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* '''[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFQFB5YpDZE Fear]]''' [[TranquilFury the wrath]] of [[Series/TheDailyShow Jon Stewart]]. ''Crossfire'' broadcaster Creator/{{CNN}} was so embarrassed ''they canceled the show''.

to:

* '''[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFQFB5YpDZE Fear]]''' [[TranquilFury the wrath]] of [[Series/TheDailyShow Jon Stewart]]. ''Crossfire'' broadcaster Creator/{{CNN}} CNN was so embarrassed ''they canceled the show''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Fred Thompson [[GentlemanSnarker gave a suavely understated one]] to Creator/MichaelMoore in a [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoAB6fz8ENc YouTube video.]] Bonus points for delivering it while lounging in his office and chomping on a Cuban cigar.

to:

* Fred Thompson Creator/FredThompson [[GentlemanSnarker gave a suavely understated one]] to Creator/MichaelMoore in a [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoAB6fz8ENc YouTube video.]] Bonus points for delivering it while lounging in his US Senate office and chomping on a Cuban cigar.



* After [=YouTuber=] Logan Paul got himself into big trouble after filming a dead body in the Suicide Forest in Japan, people blew up on him. It either ranged from constructive to downright scathing criticism by celebrities and content creators in [=YouTube=]. Examples include:

to:

* After [=YouTuber=] Logan Paul Creator/LoganPaul got himself into big trouble after filming a dead body in the Suicide Forest in Japan, people blew up on him. It either ranged from constructive to downright scathing criticism by celebrities and content creators in [=YouTube=]. Examples include:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Making this episode HilariousInHindsight: Louisville joined Duke in the Atlantic Coast Conference in July 2014; however, since the schools are in separate divisions, they don't play every year in football.

to:

** Making this episode HilariousInHindsight: Louisville joined Duke in the Atlantic Coast Conference in July 2014; however, since the schools are in separate divisions, they don't play every year in football.football. From 2014 through 2022, they were in separate divisions in that sport, and were not designated annual opponents; in the ACC's post-2023 divisionless model, neither school is one of the other's three guaranteed annual opponents.



* The ''Miami New Times'' recently blasted MLB commissioner Bud Selig after Selig asked to see some of the paper's record:

to:

* The ''Miami New Times'' recently blasted MLB commissioner Bud Selig after Selig asked to see some of the paper's record:records:



* When Chris Beard was fired as the Men's Basketball coach for UT Austin in the wake of being arrested for domestic violence, his lawyer expressed disappointment at the result. [[https://i.redd.it/sptndehg1caa1.jpg The UT administration were having none of it.]]

to:

* When Chris Beard was fired as the Men's Basketball men's basketball coach for UT Austin in the wake of being arrested for domestic violence, his lawyer expressed disappointment at the result. [[https://i.redd.it/sptndehg1caa1.jpg The UT administration were having none of it.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** TL;DR: "Thank you for your letter, and thank you for informing me you haven't sold or murdered my mother yet. The news that you sold my siblings is less well-received, but I take comfort in understanding that, far from satisfying you, it only made you ''more'' bitter and broken. I feel bad for you, but not because you recently broke your leg, but because I can't be there to break your other one for you. Bad news about your husband by the way, but I'm ''sure'' he's not burning in hell right now or anything. Rest assured I wouldn't step within a hundred feet of his grave, or you, if you were the last drop of water in the desert. I also dare you to try and force the issue, so that my friends and I can get a chance to test our trigger fingers. Die mad, —J.W. Loguen."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In 1863, Union General David Hunter wrote a letter to Confederate President Jefferson Davis, denouncing the Confederacy for mistreating captured Black Union soldiers, while calling out the hypocrisy of the Confederates who claimed to be fighting for freedom.
--> You say you are fighting for liberty. Yes you are fighting for liberty: liberty to keep four millions of your fellow-beings in ignorance and degradation;–liberty to separate parents and children, husband and wife, brother and sister;–liberty to steal the products of their labor, exacted with many a cruel lash and bitter tear;–liberty to seduce their wives and daughters, and to sell your own children into bondage;–liberty to kill these children with impunity, when the murder cannot be proven by one of pure white blood. This is the kind of liberty–the liberty to do wrong–which Satan, Chief of the fallen Angels, was contending for when he was cast into Hell.

Removed: 94

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
TRS cleanup: Natter


** [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzDbh8YF1is Now available]] as a StupidStatementDanceMix.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In 2020, Houston Texans defensive end JJ Watt gave [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyXmmYtMvD0&ab_channel=KHOU11 a scathing one]] to his teammates for a lack of effort after losing to the Cincinnati Bengals, bringing the Texans' record to 4-11.[[note]]It's worth noting that Watt is overwhelmingly known for being the epitome of a NiceGuy, so he must have been ''really'' fed up to actually go this far.[[/note]]

to:

* In 2020, Houston Texans defensive end JJ Watt gave [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyXmmYtMvD0&ab_channel=KHOU11 a scathing one]] to his teammates for a lack of effort after losing to the Cincinnati Bengals, bringing the Texans' record to 4-11.[[note]]It's worth noting that Watt is overwhelmingly known for being the epitome of a NiceGuy, so he must have been ''really'' fed up to actually go this far.[[/note]] Watt was traded to the Arizona Cardinals during the 2021 offseason, at his request[[/note]]

Top