Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 84 (click to see context) from:
* PantsPullingPrank: One of the methods Wander and Sylvia might ruin the invasion plan that Lord Hater predicts is that Sylvia could incapacitate the Watchdogs by pantsing them.
to:
* PantsPullingPrank: One of the methods in which Wander and Sylvia might ruin the invasion plan that Lord Hater predicts is that Sylvia could incapacitate the Watchdogs by pantsing them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 84 (click to see context) from:
* PantsPullingWays: One of the methods Wander and Sylvia might ruin the invasion plan that Lord Hater predicts is that Sylvia could incapacitate the Watchdogs by pantsing them.
to:
* PantsPullingWays: PantsPullingPrank: One of the methods Wander and Sylvia might ruin the invasion plan that Lord Hater predicts is that Sylvia could incapacitate the Watchdogs by pantsing them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* PantsPullingWays: One of the methods Wander and Sylvia might ruin the invasion plan that Lord Hater predicts is that Sylvia could incapacitate the Watchdogs by pantsing them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 77 (click to see context) from:
* MadAtADream: Well, at an ImagineSpot. The Watchdogs join Hater in his resentment of Peepers' hypothetical actions in a LoveTriangle involving an imaginary girl.
to:
* MadAtADream: Well, at an ImagineSpot. The At the end of one ImagineSpot, the Watchdogs join Hater in his resentment of Peepers' hypothetical actions in a LoveTriangle involving an imaginary girl.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ThirdOptionLoveInterest: "Ron the Baker," in Hater's imagined scenario where he and Peepers ruin their partnership fighting over a woman.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 77 (click to see context) from:
* MadAtADream: Well, at an ImagineSpot. The Watchdogs join Hater in his disapproval of Peepers' hypothetical actions in a LoveTriangle involving an imaginary girl.
to:
* MadAtADream: Well, at an ImagineSpot. The Watchdogs join Hater in his disapproval resentment of Peepers' hypothetical actions in a LoveTriangle involving an imaginary girl.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 77 (click to see context) from:
* MadAtADream: Well, at an ImagineSpot. The Watchdogs join Hater in his disapproval.
to:
* MadAtADream: Well, at an ImagineSpot. The Watchdogs join Hater in his disapproval.disapproval of Peepers' hypothetical actions in a LoveTriangle involving an imaginary girl.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 77 (click to see context) from:
* MadAtADream: Well, at an ImagineSpot:
to:
* MadAtADream: Well, at an ImagineSpot:ImagineSpot. The Watchdogs join Hater in his disapproval.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* MadAtADream: Well, at an ImagineSpot:
-->'''Hater:''' Why couldn't you just let me ''have'' her, Peepers?! Rosa and I would have been so happy together!!
-->'''Hater:''' Why couldn't you just let me ''have'' her, Peepers?! Rosa and I would have been so happy together!!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 72 (click to see context) from:
* FunnyBackgroundEvent: After Hater's explanation about [[DerailedForDetails how him could be so happy with Rosa]], some of the watchdogs are angry at Peepers and giving him a bad rap, as if that has actually happened.
to:
* FunnyBackgroundEvent: After Hater's explanation about [[DerailedForDetails how him he could be so happy with Rosa]], some of the watchdogs are angry at Peepers and giving him a bad rap, as if that has actually happened.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 75 (click to see context) from:
* ImagineSpotting: Peepers appears to react to the shot of Wander [[NoodleIncident standing on a wrecked Skullship over a defeated Watchdog army]] that's cued by the word "[[NoodleImplements Banjo]]."
to:
* ImagineSpotting: Peepers appears to react to the shot of Wander [[NoodleIncident standing posing with Sylvia on a wrecked Skullship over a defeated Watchdog army]] that's cued by the word "[[NoodleImplements Banjo]]."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* NoodleImplements: The first time Hater [[RunningGag raises the "banjo" objection]], we get a detailed scenario of how Wander's banjo could actually foil the current plan (by happening to match the frequency of Peepers' latest evil invention, causing it to explode). The second time, Hater's ImagineSpot cuts straight to the result without bothering to explain the logic--[[ProperlyParanoid and that result is exactly what we get at the end]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ImagineSpotting: Peepers appears to react to the shot of Wander [[NoodleIncident standing on a wrecked Skullship over a defeated Watchdog army]] that's cued by the word "[[NoodleImplements Banjo]]."
-->'''Peepers:''' HOW'D ''THAT'' HAPPEN?!
-->'''Peepers:''' HOW'D ''THAT'' HAPPEN?!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* FoeRomanceSubtext: Hater believes that the plan to kidnap and marry the princess would go wrong because she'd be Wander in disguise.
