Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / TechnologyLevels

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Literature/{{Discworld}} has been thumbing its nose at this trope ever since ''[[Literature/{{Discworld}} Moving Pictures]]''. Notably, while the invention of film in that novel was a result of alchemists' being [[TouchedByVorlons infected by the spirit of Holy Wood]], it's also straight-up subverted when the resulting industry invents color movies before sound.

to:

* Literature/{{Discworld}} has been thumbing its nose at this trope ever since ''[[Literature/{{Discworld}} Moving Pictures]]''. Notably, while the invention of film in that novel was a result of alchemists' being [[TouchedByVorlons infected by the spirit of Holy Wood]], it's also straight-up subverted when the resulting industry invents color movies before sound. Creator/TerryPratchett's view of "technology levels" is "There's no reason why worlds should develop the same way. The Greeks had all the necessary theoretical knowledge and technical ability to invent the wind-up gramophone. The steam-powered gramophone, come to that. They just never did."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Steam power is a good example of a real-life instance of this trope: [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heron_of_Alexandria Heron of Alexandria]] was messing around with steam expansion and pistons by 80AD but never quite put the two together outside of a few novelty toys. In fact, the Romans appear to have invented steam power at least three separate times, and were extremely advanced ''theoretically'' in many aspects of engineering. They understood that an "engine" which could replace slaves you have to feed, house, and keep happy enough that they don't kill you in your sleep might be possible and useful in the same way we understand that a fusion reactor might be possible and useful. So why didn't they have an industrial revolution in 200BC? Beyond the economic hurdle of competing with slave labor and animal power, they lacked calculus and certain physics formulas needed to engineer large-scale engines, the metallurgy to contain the pressure, accessible fuel deposits, and a ''need'' for more mechanical power than simpler industrial-level power sources like waterwheels or windmills could provide. Lacking these things, the steam engine remained a curiosity fondly used by tinkerers to power devices like singing mechanical birds for centuries before the world hit the "critical mass" of related technologies and economic incentive required to turn theory into fact.

to:

* Steam power is a good example of a real-life instance of this trope: [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heron_of_Alexandria Heron of Alexandria]] was messing around with steam expansion and pistons by 80AD but never quite put the two together outside of a few novelty toys. In fact, the Romans appear to have invented steam power at least three separate times, and were extremely advanced ''theoretically'' in many aspects of engineering. They understood that an "engine" which could replace slaves you have to feed, house, and keep happy enough that they don't kill you in your sleep might be possible and useful in the same way we understand that a fusion reactor might be possible and useful. So why didn't they have an industrial revolution in 200BC? Beyond the economic hurdle of competing with slave labor and animal power, [[RequiredSecondaryPowers they lacked calculus and certain physics formulas needed to engineer large-scale engines, the metallurgy to contain the pressure, accessible fuel deposits, deposits]], and a ''need'' for more mechanical power than simpler industrial-level power sources like waterwheels or windmills could provide. Lacking these things, the steam engine remained a curiosity fondly used by tinkerers to power devices like singing mechanical birds for centuries before the world hit the "critical mass" of related technologies and economic incentive required to turn theory into fact.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[quoteright:319:[[RiseOfNations http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/rontechtree_960.png]]]]

to:

[[quoteright:319:[[RiseOfNations [[quoteright:319:[[VideoGame/RiseOfNations http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/rontechtree_960.png]]]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The Centran civilization of Christopher Anvil's ''Pandora's Planet'' has a scale for this, introduced by a mention that the latest Centran conquest is at 0.9 Centra-level. One problem with the concept is highlighted with the words that come directly after that introduction: "In some respects higher."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Mentioned poetically in ''Film/{{Godzilla 2014}}'' for dramatic effect by Joseph Brody when he screams that the EMP coming from Janjira NPP's ruins will "send us back to the Stone Age".

Changed: 1045

Removed: 136

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Steam power is a good example of a real-life [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heron_of_Alexandria Heron of Alexandria]] was messing around with steam expansion and pistons, but never quite put the two together. In fact, the Romans appear to have invented steam power at least three separate times. Beyond economic inefficiency relative to slave labor, they lacked the math needed to properly engineer them, the metallurgy to contain the pressure, coal to power the engines and the deep bore mines that could not be pumped out by human or animal power... to name a few other problems.

to:

* Steam power is a good example of a real-life instance of this trope: [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heron_of_Alexandria Heron of Alexandria]] was messing around with steam expansion and pistons, pistons by 80AD but never quite put the two together. together outside of a few novelty toys. In fact, the Romans appear to have invented steam power at least three separate times. times, and were extremely advanced ''theoretically'' in many aspects of engineering. They understood that an "engine" which could replace slaves you have to feed, house, and keep happy enough that they don't kill you in your sleep might be possible and useful in the same way we understand that a fusion reactor might be possible and useful. So why didn't they have an industrial revolution in 200BC? Beyond the economic inefficiency relative to hurdle of competing with slave labor, labor and animal power, they lacked the math calculus and certain physics formulas needed to properly engineer them, large-scale engines, the metallurgy to contain the pressure, coal accessible fuel deposits, and a ''need'' for more mechanical power than simpler industrial-level power sources like waterwheels or windmills could provide. Lacking these things, the steam engine remained a curiosity fondly used by tinkerers to power devices like singing mechanical birds for centuries before the engines world hit the "critical mass" of related technologies and the deep bore mines that could not be pumped out by human or animal power... economic incentive required to name a few other problems.
turn theory into fact.



** ''All'' extant alphabetic scripts descend from the Phoenician writing system, which itself is a descendant of Egyptian hieroglyphics.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
getting rid of a ton of kruft on, and better explaining, the real-world example of steam power.


* [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heron_of_Alexandria Heron of Alexandria]] was messing around with steam expansion and pistons, but never quite put the two together. In fact, the Romans appear to have invented steam power at least three separate times. Beyond economic inefficiency relative to slave labor, they lacked the math needed to properly engineer them, the metallurgy to contain the pressure, coal to power the engines and the deep bore mines that could not be pumped out by human or animal power... to name a few other problems. Some of this can be put down to the fact that while they had scientists, they never invented the ''scientific community'' to share and review ideas.
** That said, we can't over-stress the irrelevance of the 'scientific community'. This is an engineering question with practical applications and benefits, i.e. nothing to do with 'science' - how does discovering Neptune improve crop yields or keep people from dying in childbirth, for instance? The critical thing was the utter lack of economic incentive to develop these machines. Metal and coal were very expensive, and these machines were pathetically weak. Even if a Roman tinkerer had invented a semi-efficient prototype, what market would there have been for something so incredibly expensive ''and'' less cost-effective than muscle-power in every conceivable use it could be put to?[[note]] The 'right' conditions seem to have been free labour and high labour-costs + wages, vast amounts of coal being produced for market and thus not too expensive, and iron being relatively widespread and thus not too expensive either. In these conditions it was almost inevitable that some people tinkered with improving the cost-effectiveness of their mining operations by making use of all the low-quality coal that wasn't good enough to be sold at market. They did this by using it to heat the mines in winter, but also by tinkering with replacing the business-end of their pumps (used to keep the mines dry) with machines that would also use up this cast-off coal. They were a bit rubbish, but still marginally cheaper (or not, [[RuleOfCool 'cos having a machine like that was kind of cool whilst also not being ridiculously expensive]]) than using human- or draft-animal labour the whole time.[[/note]]

to:

* *Steam power is a good example of a real-life [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heron_of_Alexandria Heron of Alexandria]] was messing around with steam expansion and pistons, but never quite put the two together. In fact, the Romans appear to have invented steam power at least three separate times. Beyond economic inefficiency relative to slave labor, they lacked the math needed to properly engineer them, the metallurgy to contain the pressure, coal to power the engines and the deep bore mines that could not be pumped out by human or animal power... to name a few other problems. Some of this can be put down to the fact that while they had scientists, they never invented the ''scientific community'' to share and review ideas.\n** That said, we can't over-stress the irrelevance of the 'scientific community'. This is an engineering question with practical applications and benefits, i.e. nothing to do with 'science' - how does discovering Neptune improve crop yields or keep people from dying in childbirth, for instance? The critical thing was the utter lack of economic incentive to develop these machines. Metal and coal were very expensive, and these machines were pathetically weak. Even if a Roman tinkerer had invented a semi-efficient prototype, what market would there have been for something so incredibly expensive ''and'' less cost-effective than muscle-power in every conceivable use it could be put to?[[note]] The 'right' conditions seem to have been free labour and high labour-costs + wages, vast amounts of coal being produced for market and thus not too expensive, and iron being relatively widespread and thus not too expensive either. In these conditions it was almost inevitable that some people tinkered with improving the cost-effectiveness of their mining operations by making use of all the low-quality coal that wasn't good enough to be sold at market. They did this by using it to heat the mines in winter, but also by tinkering with replacing the business-end of their pumps (used to keep the mines dry) with machines that would also use up this cast-off coal. They were a bit rubbish, but still marginally cheaper (or not, [[RuleOfCool 'cos having a machine like that was kind of cool whilst also not being ridiculously expensive]]) than using human- or draft-animal labour the whole time.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** That said, we can't over-stress the irrelevance of the 'scientific community'. This is an engineering question with practical applications and benefits, i.e. nothing to do with 'science' - how does discovering Neptune improve crop yields or keep people from dying in childbirth, for instance? The critical thing was the utter lack of economic incentive to develop these machines. Metal and coal were very expensive, and these machines were pathetically weak. Even if a Roman tinkerer had invented a semi-efficient prototype, what market would there have been for something so incredibly expensive ''and'' less cost-effective than muscle-power in every conceivable use it could be put to?

to:

** That said, we can't over-stress the irrelevance of the 'scientific community'. This is an engineering question with practical applications and benefits, i.e. nothing to do with 'science' - how does discovering Neptune improve crop yields or keep people from dying in childbirth, for instance? The critical thing was the utter lack of economic incentive to develop these machines. Metal and coal were very expensive, and these machines were pathetically weak. Even if a Roman tinkerer had invented a semi-efficient prototype, what market would there have been for something so incredibly expensive ''and'' less cost-effective than muscle-power in every conceivable use it could be put to? to?[[note]] The 'right' conditions seem to have been free labour and high labour-costs + wages, vast amounts of coal being produced for market and thus not too expensive, and iron being relatively widespread and thus not too expensive either. In these conditions it was almost inevitable that some people tinkered with improving the cost-effectiveness of their mining operations by making use of all the low-quality coal that wasn't good enough to be sold at market. They did this by using it to heat the mines in winter, but also by tinkering with replacing the business-end of their pumps (used to keep the mines dry) with machines that would also use up this cast-off coal. They were a bit rubbish, but still marginally cheaper (or not, [[RuleOfCool 'cos having a machine like that was kind of cool whilst also not being ridiculously expensive]]) than using human- or draft-animal labour the whole time.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** That said, we can't over-stress the irrelevance of the 'scientific community'. This is an engineering question with practical applications and benefits, i.e. nothing to do with 'science' - how does discovering Neptune improve crop yields or keep people from dying in childbirth, for instance? The critical thing was the utter lack of economic incentive to develop these machines. Metal and coal were very expensive, and these machines were pathetically weak. Even if a Roman tinkerer had invented a semi-efficient prototype, what market would there have been for something so incredibly expensive ''and'' less cost-effective than muscle-power in every conceivable use it could be put to?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Similarly, seemingly distinct, diverse technologies will always develop at the same rate. An alien world with 'renaissance' era technology (ignoring for the moment that the renaissance spanned four centuries and giant changes in technology) in, say, firearms, will also posses lenses, ships, building materials and mathematical principles identical to those that Earth (read: Western Europe) possessed along with said firearms.

to:

Similarly, seemingly distinct, diverse technologies will always develop at the same rate. An alien world with 'renaissance' era technology (ignoring for the moment that the renaissance spanned four centuries and giant changes in technology) in, say, firearms, will also posses lenses, ships, building materials and mathematical principles identical to those that Earth (read: Western the inter-continental trade-powers of north-western Europe) possessed along with said firearms.

Added: 512

Removed: 491

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
moved to correct section and namespaced


* The novel ''Where Sea Meets Sky'' in the Captain's Table series has the Federation debating whether a species that has simply domesticated [[OrganicTechnology living star ships]] counts, since they have warp travel, but not based on technology. The ''Literature/StarTrekTitan''[=/=]''[[Literature/StarTrekTyphonPact Typhon Pact]]'' novel ''Seize the Fire'' has a similar debate about a species that has developed power plants based on the same principles as the warp drive, but has no interest in space travel.



** The novel ''Where Sea Meets Sky'' in the Captain's Table series has the Federation debating whether a species that has simply domesticated [[OrganicTechnology living star ships]] counts, since they have warp travel, but not based on technology. The ''StarTrekTitan''[=/=]''[[StarTrekTyphonPact Typhon Pact]]'' novel ''Seize the Fire'' has a similar debate about a species that has developed power plants based on the same principles as the warp drive, but has no interest in space travel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''TabletopGame/StarsWithoutNumber'' has seven tech levels. At 0, your most advanced technology is a sharp rock. At 2, you've invented gunpowder. At 4, you have hyperdrive, and a lot of the stuff that made the Mandate workable and has been lost in the Scream (jump gates, psitech) was TL 5. TL 6 is reserved for the ''really'' rare and impressive stuff.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Writing in general is an aversion of this trope. Most societies (e.g. the Inca, above) with more than one city and a centralized government of any kind end up inventing a system for representing numbers and identifying objects, so that tax reports can be filed and the empire maintained; only very, ''very'' few times has anyone independently had the idea to take this to the next level and try to represent sentence structures, so that narrative structure could also be recorded. We know it happened at least twice, in Mesoamerica (Olmec pictograms) and Mesopotamia (Sumerian cuneiform). All other known writing systems ''could have'' gotten the idea from one of these two; the most likely candidate to have been a third independent invention is Chinese oracle bone script, but it's possible that the ''idea'', if not the format, was carried to China by traders.
** ''All'' alphabetic scripts descend from the Phoenician writing system.

to:

* Writing in general is an aversion of this trope. Most societies (e.g. the Inca, above) with more than one city and a centralized government of any kind end up inventing a system for representing numbers and identifying objects, so that tax reports can be filed and the empire maintained; only very, ''very'' few times has anyone independently had the idea to take this to the next level and try to represent sentence structures, so that narrative structure could also be recorded. We know it happened at least twice, in Mesoamerica (Olmec pictograms) and Mesopotamia (Sumerian cuneiform). All other known writing systems ''could have'' gotten the idea from one of these two; the most likely candidate to have been a third independent invention is Chinese oracle bone script, but it's possible that the ''idea'', if not the format, was carried to China by traders.
traders. Likewise, it is unknown if Egyptian writing was inspired by Sumerian cuneiform or was an independent invention as well - indeed, there are some indications their phonetic writing may even ''predate'' cuneiform, and the symbolic basis for their language is known to be independent. Rongorongo may or may not be yet another (semi) independent invention of writing, though whether Rongorongo even represents "true" writing is unknown, and there is a great deal of suspicion that if it does represent writing, it was inspired by seeing instances of writing in thee past.
** ''All'' extant alphabetic scripts descend from the Phoenician writing system.system, which itself is a descendant of Egyptian hieroglyphics.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Almost averted by the Roman Egyptian philosopher [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heron_of_Alexandria Heron of Alexandria]], who was messing around with steam expansion and pistons, but never quite put the two together. In fact, the Romans appear to have invented steam power at least three separate times. The problem is that steam couldn't hold a candle to slave labor economically, so they didn't do much with it.
** They also lacked the math needed to properly engineer them, the metallurgy to contain the pressure, coal to power the engines and the deep bore mines that could not be pumped out by human or animal power...to name a few other problems. A lot of this can be put down to the fact that while they had scientists, they never invented the ''scientific community'' to share and review ideas.

to:

* Almost averted by the Roman Egyptian philosopher [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heron_of_Alexandria Heron of Alexandria]], who Alexandria]] was messing around with steam expansion and pistons, but never quite put the two together. In fact, the Romans appear to have invented steam power at least three separate times. The problem is that steam couldn't hold a candle Beyond economic inefficiency relative to slave labor economically, so labor, they didn't do much with it.
** They also
lacked the math needed to properly engineer them, the metallurgy to contain the pressure, coal to power the engines and the deep bore mines that could not be pumped out by human or animal power...power... to name a few other problems. A lot Some of this can be put down to the fact that while they had scientists, they never invented the ''scientific community'' to share and review ideas.ideas.
* The [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antikythera_mechanism Antikythera mechanism]] is an example of a real life aversion, an analog computer containing gearing more complicated than anything which would be seen for over a thousand years thereafter. The Greeks never did anything more powerful with it, potentially in an enforcement of technology levels as they lacked many intermediate technologies we take for granted, and the technology was lost and reinvented later on.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Llamas can (and do) pull carts


** The main problem was that they lacked an animal strong enough to actually pull wheeled carts effectively.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Remember, don't think path, think ''[[TechTree tree]]'', just as with the evolution of biological lifeforms. Except, in this case the distant descendants of unrelated branches can inspire and influence the future of others. For inspiring viewing, see the James Burke documentary series ''{{Connections}}'', which shows the sometimes ludicrously unlikely places where inspiration and discovery come from, and the web-like connections between seemingly-unrelated inventions.

to:

Remember, don't think path, think ''[[TechTree tree]]'', just as with the evolution of biological lifeforms. Except, in this case the distant descendants of unrelated branches can inspire and influence the future of others. For inspiring viewing, see the James Burke documentary series ''{{Connections}}'', ''Series/{{Connections}}'', which shows the sometimes ludicrously unlikely places where inspiration and discovery come from, and the web-like connections between seemingly-unrelated inventions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:Comic Books]]
* An interesting take on this trope happens in one of [[DisneyDucksComicUniverse Disney Ducks]] comics, where it is played as a natural result of reaching consequent EvolutionaryLevels. While robbing Gyro's laboratory, one of the Beagle Boys gets accidentally hit in the head by Gyro's experimental "[[DevolutionDevice evolutionary ray]]". Over the next couple of days, he uses his newly heightened intelligence to develop a flawless bank robbery plan. This prompts the other Boys to give him the next dose. The hyper-intelligent Boy then turns to [[TheCracker cyber-crime and ATM machine cracking]]. Amazed with the results, the other Boys ignore his warnings and break into Gyro's lab for the [[RuleOfThree third time...]] only to discover the next day that he had reached the CrystalSpiresAndTogas level of intellectual development, gave all their money to charity, and went on to the UN to give a lecture on the elimination of crime and poverty. (They manage to reverse the effect, [[FrazettaMan but the switch gets stuck]].)
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added ordering of the tech scale for Halo.


* In ''{{Halo}}'', the [[{{Precursors}} Forerunners]] and the [[ScaryDogmaticAliens Covenant]] use a seven-tiered scale to categorize civilizations based on their technology levels, ranging from basic tool-construction to world-creation.

to:

* In ''{{Halo}}'', the [[{{Precursors}} Forerunners]] and the [[ScaryDogmaticAliens Covenant]] use a seven-tiered scale to categorize civilizations based on their technology levels, ranging from basic tool-construction (7) to world-creation.world-creation (1).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Humans have been all over the place on this; [[spoiler:while prehistoric humanity was one of only four known species to make it to at least Tier 1]], humanity circa 2552 (the original trilogy) were Tier 3, but by 2557 (''[[{{VideoGame/Halo4}} Halo 4]]''), [[TheFederation the UNSC]] seems to have reached Tier 2, making it the strongest single military power in galaxy now that the Covenant have dissolved.

to:

** Humans have been all over the place on this; [[spoiler:while prehistoric humanity was one of only four known species to make it to at least Tier 1]], humanity circa 2552 (the original trilogy) were merely at Tier 3, but by 3. By 2557 (''[[{{VideoGame/Halo4}} Halo 4]]''), however, [[TheFederation the UNSC]] seems to have reached Tier 2, making it the strongest single military power in the galaxy now that the Covenant have dissolved.has split apart.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Actually, humans were tier three in the main trilogy; Covies are tier 2, and Forerunners are tier 1 (and then there\'s the Precursors)


* ''{{Halo}}'' has a scale of technological levels based on the abilities of the culture, ranging from basic tool-construction to world-creation.
** Oddly, for a science-fiction series involving extraterrestrial life, humans are at the ''top'' of this list. By the events of ''[[{{VideoGame/Halo4}} Halo 4]]'', [[TheFederation the UNSC]] was the strongest military power in galaxy.
** An amusing species on the scale are the Brutes, who have successfully climbed to the tier involving space-flight only to drop back down to tool-making again twice; hyper-aggression and nukes don't combine well.

to:

* ''{{Halo}}'' has In ''{{Halo}}'', the [[{{Precursors}} Forerunners]] and the [[ScaryDogmaticAliens Covenant]] use a seven-tiered scale of technological levels to categorize civilizations based on the abilities of the culture, their technology levels, ranging from basic tool-construction to world-creation.
** Oddly, for a science-fiction series involving extraterrestrial life, humans are at Humans have been all over the ''top'' place on this; [[spoiler:while prehistoric humanity was one of this list. By the events of ''[[{{VideoGame/Halo4}} only four known species to make it to at least Tier 1]], humanity circa 2552 (the original trilogy) were Tier 3, but by 2557 (''[[{{VideoGame/Halo4}} Halo 4]]'', 4]]''), [[TheFederation the UNSC]] was seems to have reached Tier 2, making it the strongest single military power in galaxy.
galaxy now that the Covenant have dissolved.
** The scale also has a Tier 0 ("Transsentient"); while the Forerunners mostly considered it a theoretical ceiling, [[spoiler:their own Precursors actually pulled it off.]]
** An amusing species on the scale are the Brutes, who have successfully climbed to the tier involving space-flight only to drop back down to tool-making again twice; the pre-industrial level again; hyper-aggression and nukes don't combine well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The ''d20 Future'' supplement of the ''d20Modern'' RPG gives technology based on "Progress Levels." Modern humans, depending on geography and infrastructure, go from about PL 4 to (late) PL 5. These, along with most of the supplement's flavor, were transposed directly from ''{{Alternity}}'', which was previously published by the same publisher.

to:

* The ''d20 Future'' supplement of the ''d20Modern'' RPG gives technology based on "Progress Levels." Modern humans, depending on geography and infrastructure, go from about PL 4 to (late) PL 5. These, along with most of the supplement's flavor, were transposed directly from ''{{Alternity}}'', ''TabletopGame/{{Alternity}}'', which was previously published by the same publisher.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The novel ''Where Sea Meets Sky'' in the Captain's Table series has the Federation debating whether a species that has simply domesticated [[OrganicTechnology living star ships]] counts, since they have warp travel, but not based on technology.

to:

** The novel ''Where Sea Meets Sky'' in the Captain's Table series has the Federation debating whether a species that has simply domesticated [[OrganicTechnology living star ships]] counts, since they have warp travel, but not based on technology. The ''StarTrekTitan''[=/=]''[[StarTrekTyphonPact Typhon Pact]]'' novel ''Seize the Fire'' has a similar debate about a species that has developed power plants based on the same principles as the warp drive, but has no interest in space travel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


See also: EnforcedTechnologyLevels, EvolutionaryLevels, InSpiteOfANail. Contrast SchizoTech, AliensNeverInventedTheWheel, SufficientlyAdvancedBambooTechnology, AnachronismStew and/or FantasyGunControl.

to:

See also: EnforcedTechnologyLevels, EvolutionaryLevels, InSpiteOfANail. Contrast SchizoTech, AliensNeverInventedTheWheel, SufficientlyAdvancedBambooTechnology, AlternateTechline, AnachronismStew and/or FantasyGunControl.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''Literature/DragonsEgg'', while the Cheela's technological evolution is loosely patterned after mankind's, some of it is necessarily influenced by their environment -- mostly the ''huge'' gravity and magnetic field of the Cheela home world. So they [[AliensNeverInventedTheWheel invent the sleigh instead of the wheel]] because gravity makes axles impractical and in their "metal casting"[[hottip:*:using crystalline materials found on their star rather than actual metals]] the molds need to be oriented along the magnetic field.

to:

* In ''Literature/DragonsEgg'', while the Cheela's technological evolution is loosely patterned after mankind's, some of it is necessarily influenced by their environment -- mostly the ''huge'' gravity and magnetic field of the Cheela home world. So they [[AliensNeverInventedTheWheel invent the sleigh instead of the wheel]] because gravity makes axles impractical and in their "metal casting"[[hottip:*:using casting"[[note]]using crystalline materials found on their star rather than actual metals]] metals[[/note]] the molds need to be oriented along the magnetic field.

Added: 642

Changed: 244

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''BattleTech'' a faction's tech level is based largely on how much LostTechnology they possess. The Successor States barely remember how to make Mechs and rely on antique Jumpships and [=ComStar's=] similarly ancient network. As for [=ComStar=] and their militant faction the Word of Blake they religiously grab and hoard most examples of [=LosTek=] in the Inner Sphere. While the Clans are descendants of the Star League's military who took a lot of their technology with them and ensured that their factories and scientist caste would be safe from the constant warfare, so they have the most advanced technology in the known galaxy.



* OrionsArms carefully lays out post-{{Singularity}} techlevels based around the relative intelligence levels of ever more complex transhuman and AI minds.

to:

* OrionsArms OrionsArm carefully lays out post-{{Singularity}} techlevels based around the relative intelligence levels of ever more complex transhuman and AI minds.minds. Pre-Singularity humans can at best make basic nanotech and antimatter drives. At S1 BrainUploading and matter-to-energy conversion drives become possible. S3 minds can create Wormholes, and S4 or higher can produce {{Reactionless Drive}}s.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''MassEffect'' plays with this. [[spoiler: The Reapers deliberately expose and spread mass effect technology, along with the mass relays and the Citadel, to deliberately guide organic technological evolution along the paths they prefer. They then cut this off when they invade and wipe out all advanced life while their tech is still at a limited, controlled state.]] It is implied that [[spoiler: the geth, being a purely synthetic species, are developing along a different path than that set by the Reapers.]]

to:

* ''MassEffect'' ''Franchise/MassEffect'' plays with this. [[spoiler: The Reapers deliberately expose and spread mass effect technology, along with the mass relays and the Citadel, to deliberately guide organic technological evolution along the paths they prefer. They then cut this off when they invade and wipe out all advanced life while their tech is still at a limited, controlled state.]] It is implied that [[spoiler: the geth, being a purely synthetic species, are developing along a different path than that set by the Reapers.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Linking work


* Subverted in ''Dykstra's War'' by Jeffrey D. Kooistra. The Phinons have had space travel for eons, but [[spoiler: they are a species with barely animal-level intelligence. They naturally live in the comet clouds between solar systems, and they evolved spacecraft-building as an instinctive behavior, like bees building a hive or beavers building a dam. Their ships' "design" is incredibly weird-looking and their "technology" extremely counter-intuitive, because it's not the product of engineering in the human sense.]]

to:

* Subverted in ''Dykstra's War'' ''[[Literature/DykstrasWar Dykstra's War]]'' by Jeffrey D. Kooistra. The Phinons have had space travel for eons, but [[spoiler: they are a species with barely animal-level intelligence. They naturally live in the comet clouds between solar systems, and they evolved spacecraft-building as an instinctive behavior, like bees building a hive or beavers building a dam. Their ships' "design" is incredibly weird-looking and their "technology" extremely counter-intuitive, because it's not the product of engineering in the human sense.]]

Added: 189

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:Web Original]]
* OrionsArms carefully lays out post-{{Singularity}} techlevels based around the relative intelligence levels of ever more complex transhuman and AI minds.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the Icerigger trilogy of AlanDeanFoster, the residents of Tran-Ky-Ky are an Iron Age culture that never invented the wheel. That's because Tran-Ky-Ky is an [[SingleBiomePlanet Ice World]], and the natives mount anything heavy that needs to be transported on ice skates.

to:

* In the Icerigger trilogy of AlanDeanFoster, Creator/AlanDeanFoster, the residents of Tran-Ky-Ky are an Iron Age culture that never invented the wheel. That's because Tran-Ky-Ky is an [[SingleBiomePlanet Ice World]], and the natives mount anything heavy that needs to be transported on ice skates.

Top