Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / LiesDamnedLiesAndStatistics

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Series/TheWire'': A major theme in the series is how organizations will "juke the stats" to make it look like the organization is more successful than it is. The police department will downgrade crimes when filing them to make the crime rate look like it's going down, or start focusing on low-level, trivial arrests to make the conviction rates go up. When Prez gets a job as a teacher, he immediately notices the same tricks being done in standardized testing to make it look like students are performing better. Reality plays almost no part in what the stats suggest.

to:

* ''Series/TheWire'': A major theme in the series is how organizations will "juke the stats" to make it look like the organization is more successful than it is. The police department will downgrade crimes (changing them to similar but less serious crimes) when filing them to make it look as though the crime rate look like it's of violent and major crimes are going down, or start focusing on low-level, trivial arrests to make the conviction rates go up. When ex-cop Prez gets a job as a teacher, he immediately notices the same very similar tricks being done in used to manipulate the standardized testing to results and make it look like students are performing better. Reality plays better than they really are. The stats have almost no part in what relationship with real conditions, and making the stats suggest.look good almost always gets in the way of institutions fulfilling their actual function.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Statistics are like studies: who made them and who paid them matters a lot. Want to "prove" that [[MurderSimulators video games cause violence]]? Get a group of scientists that are already savvy about this and don't mind the lack of ethics. Have them draw from a very small pool of test subjects that are known to display violent behavior. Mental hospitals, prisons, schools for children with behavior disorders, what have you. Do some generic tests that are guaranteed to show up positive, come up with numbers, and presto, instant headline. "Recent test shows 77% of subjects become more violent after playing ''Franchise/MortalKombat''." Most people won't bother with reading the article the whole way through and will just look at the headline. This works with anything from [[UsefulNotes/TheComicsCode comic books]] and rock to watching ''Film/BrokebackMountain'' or voting for specific parties, basically anything. See PushPolling for a specific form of this.

to:

Statistics are like studies: who made them and who paid them matters a lot. Want to "prove" that [[MurderSimulators video games cause violence]]? Get a group of scientists that are already savvy about this and don't mind the lack of ethics. Have them draw from a very small pool of test subjects that are known to display violent behavior. Mental hospitals, prisons, schools for children with behavior disorders, what have you. Do some generic tests that are guaranteed to show up positive, come up with numbers, and presto, instant headline. "Recent test shows 77% of subjects become more violent after playing ''Franchise/MortalKombat''." Most people won't bother with reading the article the whole way through and will just look at the headline. This works with anything from [[UsefulNotes/TheComicsCode [[MediaNotes/TheComicsCode comic books]] and rock to watching ''Film/BrokebackMountain'' or voting for specific parties, basically anything. See PushPolling for a specific form of this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)

Added DiffLines:

* Creator/JonBois invokes this in his video "The Search for the Saddest Punt in the World," where he creates a mathematical formula called "The Surrender Index" as a way of quantifying the cowardice of any given punt in the [[UsefulNotes/NationalFootballLeague NFL]]. By his own admission, the purpose of the formula is mostly just to demonstrate how much he hates it when teams punt the ball in situations where attempting a field goal or going for it would be a better option.
-->'''Jon''': Where is any of this derived from? It's derived from my dissatisfaction. It's a reflection of how I feel. I'm misusing algebra to throw a fit.

Added: 326

Changed: 261

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


See also NineOutOfTenDoctorsAgree, which is much a sub trope to this, and AbsoluteComparative, where the use of statistics is avoided entirely by comparing the product to nothing. Subtrope of LyingByOmission, where the omission is the context of the statistics.

to:

See also NineOutOfTenDoctorsAgree, which

NineOutOfTenDoctorsAgree
is much a sub trope sub-trope. Compare SelectiveStupidity, doing some ManipulativeEditing to this, and make people appear stupid. Contrast AbsoluteComparative, where the use of statistics is avoided entirely by comparing the product to nothing. Subtrope of LyingByOmission, where the omission is the context of the statistics.



Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Ancel Keys deliberately messed with his research to "prove" the lipid hypothesis, throwing out more than half the countries he examined because their data did not fit his pet theory that animal fats are bad for human health (despite humans having evolved to eat fruit and meat, not grains). For instance, Chile ate little fat but got a lot of heart disease, while Norway and Holland ate a lot of fat but got little heart disease. He was not the only one who deliberately messed with the data, either.

to:

** Ancel Keys deliberately messed with his research to "prove" the lipid hypothesis, throwing hypothesis. Keys threw out more than half the countries he examined because their data did not fit his pet theory that animal fats are bad for human health (despite humans having evolved to eat fruit and meat, not grains).health. For instance, Chile ate little fat but got a lot of heart disease, while Norway and Holland ate a lot of fat but got little heart disease. He Keys was not the only one who deliberately messed with the data, either.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[caption-width-right:350:Not shown: Bunk, bupkis, malarky, cockamamie.]]

to:

[[caption-width-right:350:Not shown: pictured: Bunk, bupkis, malarky, cockamamie.]]



-->-- '''Homer Simpson''', ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'' ("Homer the Vigilante")

to:

-->-- '''Homer Simpson''', ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'' ("Homer , "[[Recap/TheSimpsonsS5E11HomerTheVigilante Homer the Vigilante")
Vigilante]]"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Cross Wicking with minor edit for work-page context that trope-page lacks.

Added DiffLines:

* In ''Literature/PleaseDontTellMyParentsIveGotHenchmen'', retired superheroine The Audit names her least favorite statistic as "seventy-four percent of super humans with a certain combination of hair style and color have powers with a 'possession' mechanic." As she points out, this is completely meaningless; "possession mechanic" is ill-defined, the sample size is stupidly small (''nineteen people''), and correlation is not causation.
--> '''The Audit''': That statistic exemplifies everything wrong with how people misuse numbers.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Programs on Creator/AnimalPlanet are fond of citing how Americans spend more money annually on cat or dog food than on baby food. This is depicted as evidence that Americans pamper their pets like babies but overlooks several facts: that pets eat pet food for their entire lives, whereas babies only eat baby food for about a year and a half, and that many families have more than one pet at a time, but relatively few have more than one child of an age to eat baby food at the same time. Also, a baby might consume free breast milk from the mother which wouldn't show up in the statistics when calculating the cost of baby food, or parents who make their own baby food.

to:

* Programs on Creator/AnimalPlanet are fond of citing how Americans spend more money annually on cat or dog food than on baby food. This is depicted as evidence that Americans pamper their pets like babies but overlooks several facts: that pets eat pet food for their entire lives, whereas babies only eat baby food consume formula and jarred foods for about a year and a half, and that many families have more than one pet at a time, but relatively few have more than one child of an age to eat baby food at the same time. Also, a baby might consume free breast milk from the mother mother, which wouldn't costs nothing, or homemade baby food, neither of which would show up in the statistics when calculating the cost of baby food, or how much parents who make their own spend on baby food. food.

Top