Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 40 (click to see context) from:
* Website/RottenTomatoes is one of the most ubiquitous examples in today's media. It samples a collection of reviews from different sources and assigns each review a "Fresh" or "Rotten" designation based on whether or not it was favorable to its movie, then tabulates those and assigns a movie an overall "Fresh" or "Rotten" rating with a corresponding red tomato icon or green splat icon. To earn a "Fresh" rating, the percentage of positive reviews has to be at least 60% of the total, with movies that are at or over 75% being designated "Certified Fresh".
to:
* Website/RottenTomatoes Rotten Tomatoes is one of the most ubiquitous examples in today's media. It samples a collection of reviews from different sources and assigns each review a "Fresh" or "Rotten" designation based on whether or not it was favorable to its movie, then tabulates those and assigns a movie an overall "Fresh" or "Rotten" rating with a corresponding red tomato icon or green splat icon. To earn a "Fresh" rating, the percentage of positive reviews has to be at least 60% of the total, with movies that are at or over 75% being designated "Certified Fresh".
Changed line(s) 108 (click to see context) from:
* Website/YouTube toy reviewer WebVideo/JobbyTheHong has a 5-tier scale based on small Franchise/{{Godzilla}} figures interacting with the subject of the review. The scale is:
to:
* Website/YouTube Platform/YouTube toy reviewer WebVideo/JobbyTheHong has a 5-tier scale based on small Franchise/{{Godzilla}} figures interacting with the subject of the review. The scale is:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
index wick
Changed line(s) 6,7 (click to see context) from:
While many media reviewers stick to a familiar scale of letters, numbers, or simply stars when rating what they're reviewing, some like to mix things up, either by using a completely unique scale or by putting a spin on an old scale that makes it fresh and easily identifiable to that person. This makes them stand out from other reviewers and can be a draw to their work. It's even more of a point of recognition if these scales/systems incorporate a CatchPhrase or something similar.
to:
While many media reviewers stick to a familiar scale of letters, numbers, or simply stars when rating what they're reviewing, some like to mix things up, either by using a completely unique scale or by putting a spin on an old scale that makes it fresh and easily identifiable to that person. This makes them stand out from other reviewers and can be a draw to their work. It's even more of a point of recognition if these scales/systems incorporate a CatchPhrase catchphrase or something similar.
Changed line(s) 117 (click to see context) from:
* In his "Dunkview" videos, LetsPlay/VideoGameDunkey awards "dunk points" to games, though usually not in any seriousness whatsoever, and amazing games can be rated 0/5 (to date the only ''serious'' 0/5 game rating he's ever given has been ''VideoGame/KingdomHeartsIII''), while lackluster ones (''VideoGame/{{Knack}} 2'']] [[CatchPhrase bay]][[MemeticMutation beeeeeeee]]) can get 10/5 (for the graphics alone, even).
to:
* In his "Dunkview" videos, LetsPlay/VideoGameDunkey awards "dunk points" to games, though usually not in any seriousness whatsoever, and amazing games can be rated 0/5 (to date the only ''serious'' 0/5 game rating he's ever given has been ''VideoGame/KingdomHeartsIII''), while lackluster ones (''VideoGame/{{Knack}} 2'']] [[CatchPhrase bay]][[MemeticMutation beeeeeeee]]) [[MemeticMutation baybeeeeeeee]]) can get 10/5 (for the graphics alone, even).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 36 (click to see context) from:
[[folder:Films -- Live-Action]]
to:
NOTE: Since film reviewers often do both live-action and animated films, there will not be a distinction made in this section.
Changed line(s) 82 (click to see context) from:
to:
* [[https://www.youtube.com/@cosmonautvarietyhour The Cosmonaut Variety Hour]] usually gives films a X/10 rating, but will occasionally break this format if he feels a movie doesn't merit an actual score. For instance, in "[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CdTI1ytAsE&t=1418s The Hobbit Trilogy - Why It Sucks]]", he rates ''Film/TheHobbitAnUnexpectedJourney'' as "Okay/10", ''Film/TheHobbitTheDesolationOfSmaug'' as "Bad/10", and ''Film/TheHobbitTheBattleOfTheFiveArmies'' as "Dumb/10".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 97 (click to see context) from:
* [[WebVideo/TheNeedleDrop Anthony Fantano]] uses a 0 - 10 numerical scale when rating albums, but qualifies the numbers with "light", "decent", or "strong". He also uses "NOT GOOD" as its own rating for albums that he didn't have high expectations for and which did end up being complete duds in his opinion, and "NOT BAD" for albums that he expected to be duds but found surprisingly listenable.
to:
* [[WebVideo/TheNeedleDrop Anthony Fantano]] uses a 0 - 10 numerical scale when rating albums, but qualifies the numbers with "light", "decent", or "strong". He also uses "NOT GOOD" as its own rating for albums that he didn't have high expectations for and which did end up being complete duds in his opinion, and "NOT BAD" for albums that he expected to be duds but found surprisingly listenable.listenable in spite of whatever problems they have.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 28 (click to see context) from:
** '''It’s… Complicated''': "Similar to the above category, but in addition to all those possible feminist themes, the show may be biting off more than it can chew or in danger of fumbling its chosen themes."
to:
** '''It’s… '''It's... Complicated''': "Similar to the above category, but in addition to all those possible feminist themes, the show may be biting off more than it can chew or in danger of fumbling its chosen themes."
Changed line(s) 30 (click to see context) from:
** '''Yellow Flags''': "Premieres that weren’t actively hateful at the premise level, but still raised some noteworthy caveats or concerns."
to:
** '''Yellow Flags''': "Premieres that weren’t weren't actively hateful at the premise level, but still raised some noteworthy caveats or concerns."
Changed line(s) 32 (click to see context) from:
** '''Pit of Shame''': "These shows need to go to their room and think about what they’ve done."
to:
** '''Pit of Shame''': "These shows need to go to their room and think about what they’ve they've done."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* [[http://www.animefeminist.com Anime Feminist]] rates titles according to how feminist-friendly they are, rather than the overall quality of the work. The ratings are:
** '''Feminist Potential''': "Premieres that so far seem to be addressing progressive ideas or themes and executing them competently."
** '''It’s… Complicated''': "Similar to the above category, but in addition to all those possible feminist themes, the show may be biting off more than it can chew or in danger of fumbling its chosen themes."
** '''Neutral Zone''': "Very little to warn folks about, but also not a ton of progressive ideas to chew on so far either."
** '''Yellow Flags''': "Premieres that weren’t actively hateful at the premise level, but still raised some noteworthy caveats or concerns."
** '''Red Flags''': "A whole lotta yikes."
** '''Pit of Shame''': "These shows need to go to their room and think about what they’ve done."
** '''[[Memes/{{Anime}} Anime was a Mistake]]''': "We had to make a whole category for pedophilia and slavery apologia, and this is it."
** '''Feminist Potential''': "Premieres that so far seem to be addressing progressive ideas or themes and executing them competently."
** '''It’s… Complicated''': "Similar to the above category, but in addition to all those possible feminist themes, the show may be biting off more than it can chew or in danger of fumbling its chosen themes."
** '''Neutral Zone''': "Very little to warn folks about, but also not a ton of progressive ideas to chew on so far either."
** '''Yellow Flags''': "Premieres that weren’t actively hateful at the premise level, but still raised some noteworthy caveats or concerns."
** '''Red Flags''': "A whole lotta yikes."
** '''Pit of Shame''': "These shows need to go to their room and think about what they’ve done."
** '''[[Memes/{{Anime}} Anime was a Mistake]]''': "We had to make a whole category for pedophilia and slavery apologia, and this is it."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 97 (click to see context) from:
* Website/YouTube toy reviewer [[https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC70F5cxWj0AeZfbbjJg-eGg Jobby the Hong]] has a 5-tier scale based on small Franchise/{{Godzilla}} figures interacting with the subject of the review. The scale is:
to:
* Website/YouTube toy reviewer [[https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC70F5cxWj0AeZfbbjJg-eGg Jobby the Hong]] WebVideo/JobbyTheHong has a 5-tier scale based on small Franchise/{{Godzilla}} figures interacting with the subject of the review. The scale is:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 20 (click to see context) from:
* WebVideo/{{Arkada}}, for his {{anime}} review series ''Glass Reflection'', formerly combined a numerical score that was a rough aggregate of various factors with a unique overall rating system, but eventually went solely with the overall ratings as the scoring was cumbersome and often confusing and contradictory between reviews. His scale is:
to:
* WebVideo/{{Arkada}}, for his {{anime}} review series ''Glass Reflection'', formerly combined a numerical score that was a rough aggregate of various factors with a unique overall rating system, but system. However, he eventually went solely with the overall ratings ratings, as the scoring was cumbersome and often confusing and contradictory between reviews. His scale is:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
[[quoteright:350:[[WebVideo/TheNeedleDrop https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/notgood.png]]]]
to:
%% Please do not replace or remove without starting a new thread.
Added DiffLines:
[[quoteright:306:[[WebOriginal/MrCranky https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/untitled_11_21.png]]]]
%%
%%
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
to:
%%
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
** '''Fuck It''': Usually reserved for titles that are a complete failure for one reason or another. ''[[Manga/NoMatterHowILookAtItItsYouGuysFaultImNotPopular WataMote]]'', while it had some merit, earned this rating mainly due to its unbearable cringiness.
to:
** '''Fuck It''': Usually reserved for titles that are a complete failure for one reason or another. ''[[Manga/NoMatterHowILookAtItItsYouGuysFaultImNotPopular WataMote]]'', while it had some merit, earned this rating mainly due to its unbearable cringiness.[[CringeComedy cringiness]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 19,20 (click to see context) from:
** '''Buy It''': A very good show that's worth shelling out the money to add to your collection.
** '''Stream It''': Worth watching, but only worth buying if you really dug it.
** '''Stream It''': Worth watching, but only worth buying if you really dug it.
to:
** '''Buy It''': A very good show that's worth shelling out the money to add to your collection.
for a physical copy.
** '''Stream It''':Worth watching, but only A decent show that's worth buying if you really dug it.checking out, but has too many issues to merit a Buy It rating.
** '''Stream It''':
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 61 (click to see context) from:
* Brazilian channel [[https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnXD_lUxCSPF-GqeXHcjqCA Trasheira Violenta]], specialized in horror, has quite the different one - in the video [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8C05fDIflg explaining the scale]], one of the channel's two hosts notes he doesn't believe quality can be simply conveyed in a numeric scale:
to:
* Brazilian channel [[https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnXD_lUxCSPF-GqeXHcjqCA Trasheira Violenta]], specialized which specializes in horror, has quite the different one - in the video [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8C05fDIflg explaining the scale]], one of the channel's two hosts notes he doesn't believe quality can be simply conveyed in a numeric scale:
Changed line(s) 64,66 (click to see context) from:
** '''Trasheira''' (something akin to 'trashness'): It's bad, [[SoBadItsGood but it's fun]] - or it deliberately uses trashy aesthetics (like [[BloodyHilarious exaggerated]] {{Horror Comed|y}}ies such as ''Film/{{Braindead}}'' and ''Film/EvilDead2'') and is very entertaining.
** '''[[BreadEggsBreadedEggs Trasheira Notável]]''': It's trashy, but has notable qualities to actually be considered a good movie.
** '''Meditável''': 'Meditable', which along with a name punning how it's half-way through 'median' and 'notable', it notes something that [[FridgeBrilliance becomes better as you rethink and ruminate its contents]].
** '''[[BreadEggsBreadedEggs Trasheira Notável]]''': It's trashy, but has notable qualities to actually be considered a good movie.
** '''Meditável''': 'Meditable', which along with a name punning how it's half-way through 'median' and 'notable', it notes something that [[FridgeBrilliance becomes better as you rethink and ruminate its contents]].
to:
** '''Trasheira''' (something akin to 'trashness'): It's bad, [[SoBadItsGood but it's fun]] - fun]], or it deliberately uses trashy aesthetics (like [[BloodyHilarious exaggerated]] {{Horror Comed|y}}ies such as ''Film/{{Braindead}}'' and ''Film/EvilDead2'') and is very entertaining.
** '''[[BreadEggsBreadedEggs Trasheira Notável]]''': It's trashy, but has enough notable qualities to actually be considered a good movie.
** '''Meditável''': 'Meditable', which along with a name punning how it's half-waythrough between 'median' and 'notable', it notes something that [[FridgeBrilliance becomes better as you rethink and ruminate its contents]].
** '''[[BreadEggsBreadedEggs Trasheira Notável]]''': It's trashy, but has enough notable qualities to actually be considered a good movie.
** '''Meditável''': 'Meditable', which along with a name punning how it's half-way
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* Brazilian channel [[https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnXD_lUxCSPF-GqeXHcjqCA Trasheira Violenta]], specialized in horror, has quite the different one - in the video [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8C05fDIflg explaining the scale]], one of the channel's two hosts notes he doesn't believe quality can be simply conveyed in a numeric scale:
** '''Clássico''': 'Classic', a good movie with either a positive reputation or the potential to be well-remembered.
** '''Mediano''', '''Notável''', '''Muito Bom''', '''Sensacional''': The closest thing to ranked categories, for positive responses - 'Median\Average', 'Notable', 'Very Good' and 'Spectacular'
** '''Trasheira''' (something akin to 'trashness'): It's bad, [[SoBadItsGood but it's fun]] - or it deliberately uses trashy aesthetics (like [[BloodyHilarious exaggerated]] {{Horror Comed|y}}ies such as ''Film/{{Braindead}}'' and ''Film/EvilDead2'') and is very entertaining.
** '''[[BreadEggsBreadedEggs Trasheira Notável]]''': It's trashy, but has notable qualities to actually be considered a good movie.
** '''Meditável''': 'Meditable', which along with a name punning how it's half-way through 'median' and 'notable', it notes something that [[FridgeBrilliance becomes better as you rethink and ruminate its contents]].
** '''GuiltyPleasure''': Self-explanatory, has a personal 'appeal' that trumps its questionable quality.
** '''Sonífero''': 'Sleep-inducing', self-explanatory - it's bad enough to be boring.
** '''Constrangedor''': 'Embarrassing', fails enough to become cringe-inducing.
** '''[[GratuitousEnglish My Eyes!]]''': Referencing the infamous [[Film/TheWickerMan2006 "NOT THE BEES!"]] scene, a totally irredeemable thing. Introduced at the spot as the other host [[BrokeTheRatingScale thought the movie was so bad]] [[FMinusMinus it warranted its own bottom-grade category]].
** '''Clássico''': 'Classic', a good movie with either a positive reputation or the potential to be well-remembered.
** '''Mediano''', '''Notável''', '''Muito Bom''', '''Sensacional''': The closest thing to ranked categories, for positive responses - 'Median\Average', 'Notable', 'Very Good' and 'Spectacular'
** '''Trasheira''' (something akin to 'trashness'): It's bad, [[SoBadItsGood but it's fun]] - or it deliberately uses trashy aesthetics (like [[BloodyHilarious exaggerated]] {{Horror Comed|y}}ies such as ''Film/{{Braindead}}'' and ''Film/EvilDead2'') and is very entertaining.
** '''[[BreadEggsBreadedEggs Trasheira Notável]]''': It's trashy, but has notable qualities to actually be considered a good movie.
** '''Meditável''': 'Meditable', which along with a name punning how it's half-way through 'median' and 'notable', it notes something that [[FridgeBrilliance becomes better as you rethink and ruminate its contents]].
** '''GuiltyPleasure''': Self-explanatory, has a personal 'appeal' that trumps its questionable quality.
** '''Sonífero''': 'Sleep-inducing', self-explanatory - it's bad enough to be boring.
** '''Constrangedor''': 'Embarrassing', fails enough to become cringe-inducing.
** '''[[GratuitousEnglish My Eyes!]]''': Referencing the infamous [[Film/TheWickerMan2006 "NOT THE BEES!"]] scene, a totally irredeemable thing. Introduced at the spot as the other host [[BrokeTheRatingScale thought the movie was so bad]] [[FMinusMinus it warranted its own bottom-grade category]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 14 (click to see context) :
Changed line(s) 58 (click to see context) from:
* The [=AV=] Club used to have a frequent commenter and occasional guest columnist in the Film section calling himself [=ZODIAC MOTHERFUCKER=] (all caps, always) who absolutely preferred films in the RatedMForManly genre and disdained basically anything else. [[https://twitter.com/zodiac_mf He still has a presence on Twitter.]] His rating system was simple:
to:
* The [=AV=] Club Website/AVClub used to have a frequent commenter and occasional guest columnist in the Film section calling himself [=ZODIAC MOTHERFUCKER=] (all caps, always) who absolutely preferred films in the RatedMForManly genre and disdained basically anything else. [[https://twitter.com/zodiac_mf He still has a presence on Twitter.]] His rating system was simple:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* The [=AV=] Club used to have a frequent commenter and occasional guest columnist in the Film section calling himself [=ZODIAC MOTHERFUCKER=] (all caps, always) who absolutely preferred films in the RatedMForManly genre and disdained basically anything else. [[https://twitter.com/zodiac_mf He still has a presence on Twitter.]] His rating system was simple:
** '''OPTIONAL:''' Watch it if you want, who gives a shit?
** '''NOT OPTIONAL:''' Watch this movie or you are scum
** '''WACK AS FUCK:''' Garbage you should never watch
** '''OPTIONAL:''' Watch it if you want, who gives a shit?
** '''NOT OPTIONAL:''' Watch this movie or you are scum
** '''WACK AS FUCK:''' Garbage you should never watch
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 72 (click to see context) from:
* [[WebVideo/TheNeedleDrop Anthony Fantano]] uses a 0 - 10 numerical scale when rating albums, but qualifies the numbers with "light", "decent", or "strong". He also uses "NOT GOOD" as its own rating for albums that he didn't have high expectations for and which did end up being complete duds in his opinion.
to:
* [[WebVideo/TheNeedleDrop Anthony Fantano]] uses a 0 - 10 numerical scale when rating albums, but qualifies the numbers with "light", "decent", or "strong". He also uses "NOT GOOD" as its own rating for albums that he didn't have high expectations for and which did end up being complete duds in his opinion.opinion, and "NOT BAD" for albums that he expected to be duds but found surprisingly listenable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Adding folders.
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
[[AC:{{Anime}} and {{Manga}}]]
to:
[[folder:Anime & Manga]]
Changed line(s) 22,23 (click to see context) from:
[[AC:{{Film}}]]
to:
[[folder:Films -- Live-Action]]
Changed line(s) 55,56 (click to see context) from:
[[AC:LiveActionTV]]
to:
[[folder:Live-Action TV]]
Changed line(s) 58,59 (click to see context) from:
[[AC:{{Music}}]]
to:
[[folder:Multiple Media]]
* WebOriginal/MylesPower ranks Woo, [[AllNaturalSnakeOil Quackery]] and ConspiracyTheorist books, movies and such using three scales (per review), each going from zero to five.
** '''Tinfoil Hats''': How out there the content is.
** '''David Shuckeman faces''': How much bad science there is.
** '''Music/KennyLoggins faces''': How dangerous it is. (replaced Hulk faces which were used to rate how angry the work made him, but were retired for being too subjective)
[[/folder]]
[[folder:Music]]
Changed line(s) 61,62 (click to see context) from:
[[AC:{{Radio}}]]
to:
[[folder:Radio]]
Changed line(s) 64,65 (click to see context) from:
[[AC:{{Toys}}]]
to:
[[folder:Toys]]
Changed line(s) 72,73 (click to see context) from:
[[AC:VideoGames]]
to:
[[folder:Video Games]]
Changed line(s) 85,91 (click to see context) from:
[[AC:Multi-media]]
* WebOriginal/MylesPower ranks Woo, [[AllNaturalSnakeOil Quackery]] and ConspiracyTheorist books, movies and such using three scales (per review), each going from zero to five.
** '''Tinfoil Hats''': How out there the content is.
** '''David Shuckeman faces''': How much bad science there is.
** '''Music/KennyLoggins faces''': How dangerous it is. (replaced Hulk faces which were used to rate how angry the work made him, but were retired for being too subjective)
to:
Changed line(s) 94 (click to see context) from:
[[AC:VideoGames]]
to:
Changed line(s) 96 (click to see context) from:
to:
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 74 (click to see context) from:
* In his "Dunkview" videos, LetsPlay/VideoGameDunkey awards "dunk points" to games, though usually not in any seriousness whatsoever, and amazing games can be rated 0/5 (to date the only ''serious'' 0/5 game rating he's ever given has been ''VideoGame/KingdomHearts3''), while lackluster ones ([[VideoGame/{{Knack}} Knack 2]] [[CatchPhrase bay]][[MemeticMutation beeeeeeee]]) can get 10/5 (for the graphics alone, even).
to:
* In his "Dunkview" videos, LetsPlay/VideoGameDunkey awards "dunk points" to games, though usually not in any seriousness whatsoever, and amazing games can be rated 0/5 (to date the only ''serious'' 0/5 game rating he's ever given has been ''VideoGame/KingdomHearts3''), ''VideoGame/KingdomHeartsIII''), while lackluster ones ([[VideoGame/{{Knack}} Knack 2]] (''VideoGame/{{Knack}} 2'']] [[CatchPhrase bay]][[MemeticMutation beeeeeeee]]) can get 10/5 (for the graphics alone, even).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
* WebVideo/{{Arkada}} formerly combined a numerical score that was a rough aggregate of various factors with a unique overall rating system, but eventually went solely with the overall ratings as the scoring was cumbersome and often confusing and contradictory between reviews. His scale is:
to:
* WebVideo/{{Arkada}} WebVideo/{{Arkada}}, for his {{anime}} review series ''Glass Reflection'', formerly combined a numerical score that was a rough aggregate of various factors with a unique overall rating system, but eventually went solely with the overall ratings as the scoring was cumbersome and often confusing and contradictory between reviews. His scale is:
Changed line(s) 25 (click to see context) from:
* Website/RottenTomatoes is one of the most ubiquitous examples in today's media. It samples a collection of reviews from different sources and assigns each review a "Fresh" or "Rotten" designation based on whether or not it was favorable to its movie, then tabulates those and assigns a movie an overall "Fresh" or "Rotten" rating with a corresponding red tomato icon or green splat icon. To earn a "Fresh" rating, the percentage of positive reviews has to meet or exceed 60% of the total, with movies that are at or over 75% being designated "Certified Fresh".
to:
* Website/RottenTomatoes is one of the most ubiquitous examples in today's media. It samples a collection of reviews from different sources and assigns each review a "Fresh" or "Rotten" designation based on whether or not it was favorable to its movie, then tabulates those and assigns a movie an overall "Fresh" or "Rotten" rating with a corresponding red tomato icon or green splat icon. To earn a "Fresh" rating, the percentage of positive reviews has to meet or exceed be at least 60% of the total, with movies that are at or over 75% being designated "Certified Fresh".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7,8 (click to see context) from:
Compare: AbstractScale (measuring something that can't really be measured in the first place) and HiroshimaAsAUnitOfMeasure (using comparisons as a means of measurement).
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
new trope, indexing begins now
Deleted line(s) 9,10 (click to see context) :
'''Needs examples'''
Changed line(s) 99,100 (click to see context) from:
----
Index: CriticismTropes, StockPhrases
Index: CriticismTropes, StockPhrases
to:
Index: CriticismTropes, StockPhrases
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Created from YKTTW
Added DiffLines:
[[quoteright:350:[[WebVideo/TheNeedleDrop https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/notgood.png]]]]
While many media reviewers stick to a familiar scale of letters, numbers, or simply stars when rating what they're reviewing, some like to mix things up, either by using a completely unique scale or by putting a spin on an old scale that makes it fresh and easily identifiable to that person. This makes them stand out from other reviewers and can be a draw to their work. It's even more of a point of recognition if these scales/systems incorporate a CatchPhrase or something similar.
Can sometimes incorporate BrokeTheRatingScale in unusual cases.
Compare: AbstractScale (measuring something that can't really be measured in the first place) and HiroshimaAsAUnitOfMeasure (using comparisons as a means of measurement).
'''Needs examples'''
----
!!Examples (sorted by the media being reviewed):
%%
%% EDITOR'S NOTE: Please describe all scales from best to worst.
%%
[[AC:{{Anime}} and {{Manga}}]]
* WebVideo/{{Arkada}} formerly combined a numerical score that was a rough aggregate of various factors with a unique overall rating system, but eventually went solely with the overall ratings as the scoring was cumbersome and often confusing and contradictory between reviews. His scale is:
** '''Certified Frosty''': As he puts it: "A rating reserved only for the best of the best and those shows too important to ignore."
** '''Buy It''': A very good show that's worth shelling out the money to add to your collection.
** '''Stream It''': Worth watching, but only worth buying if you really dug it.
** '''Skip It''': Generally not worth your time.
** '''Fuck It''': Usually reserved for titles that are a complete failure for one reason or another. ''[[Manga/NoMatterHowILookAtItItsYouGuysFaultImNotPopular WataMote]]'', while it had some merit, earned this rating mainly due to its unbearable cringiness.
[[AC:{{Film}}]]
* ''Series/SiskelAndEbert'' is the TropeMaker. Gene Siskel and Creator/RogerEbert rated films with a simple thumbs up/down, and this, combined with their lively discussions/arguments supporting their decisions, made the show almost a cultural touchstone for movie reviewing prior to Website/RottenTomatoes.
* Website/RottenTomatoes is one of the most ubiquitous examples in today's media. It samples a collection of reviews from different sources and assigns each review a "Fresh" or "Rotten" designation based on whether or not it was favorable to its movie, then tabulates those and assigns a movie an overall "Fresh" or "Rotten" rating with a corresponding red tomato icon or green splat icon. To earn a "Fresh" rating, the percentage of positive reviews has to meet or exceed 60% of the total, with movies that are at or over 75% being designated "Certified Fresh".
* Creator/JeremyJahns has [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqEZXS4CMmg a descriptor-based scale]] that he admits is loosely applicable and very context-specific outside of the top and bottom tiers, and that he created mainly for fun when his subscriber count was low:
** '''Awesometacular''': Excellent, although maybe not perfect.
** '''Worth Buying on Blu-Ray'''
** '''A Good Time (No Alcohol Required)'''[[note]]Sometimes with the addendum "At matinee price"[[/note]]
** '''A Good Time If You're Drunk'''[[note]]This one can be good or bad depending on the context of the review.[[/note]]
** '''Not Going to Remember in T-Minus [Short Period of Time]'''
** '''Dogshit''': A truly bad film.
** '''Nothing''': Only used for about two to three films so far, used to describe films abysmal in the sense that they feel blank or unfinished.
** '''Tour de Force''': A rarely-used one, awarded to films that might actually be good but that he finds too stuffy/arty/pretentious.
* While WebAnimation/{{Spill}} was still an active website, its participants rated movies on the following scale:
** '''Better Than Sex!''': The BrokeTheRatingScale rating, given for films which are beyond the expectation for a good film and magnificently set a new cinematic standard.
** '''Full Price!''': Genuinely good films according to current standards, with few to no flaws.
** '''Matinee!''': Entertaining films that are worth seeing in the theater but are flawed enough to only warrant a matinee ticket.
** '''Rental''': An okay movie, something not worth paying movie ticket prices to see.
** '''Some Ole Bullshit!''': Films that are either poorly made or simply bad, but not to the point of being horrible.
** '''Fuck You!!!''': An unofficial rating, the equivalent of the Better Than Sex rating for bad films. These films are bad to the point of being offensive to the viewers and the Spill crew, often in more ways than one. They added this one to the list after realizing that the Creator/SeltzerAndFriedberg films [[BrokeTheRatingScale were beyond the badness of the Some Ole Bullshit! rating]].
* Mr. Cranky, while it was still online, was unusual in that it took a satirically cynical attitude toward reviewing movies and used bombs as its baseline scale. ''All'' movies were deemed bad; the rating was based on ''how'' bad they were. Thus, their scale was:
** '''One bomb''': Almost tolerable.
** '''Two bombs''': Consistently annoying.
** '''Three bombs''': Will require therapy after viewing.
** '''Four bombs''': As good as a poke in the eye with a sharp stick.
** '''Ka-BOOM!''': So godawful that it ruptured the very fabric of space and time with the sheer overpowering force of its mediocrity.
** '''Nuke''': Proof that Jesus died in vain.
* ''Zombie Movies: The Ultimate Guide'' has as its ratings:
** '''Highly Recommended''': "The absolute best in zombie films."
** '''Recommended''': "Solid, entertaining pictures that should satisfy viewers."
** '''At Your Own Risk''': "You may appreciate some of these, but don't count on a classic."
** '''Avoid At All Costs''': "Unless you're a serious fan, you don't need to see these."
** '''So Bad It's Good''': "Great stuff for fans of bad cinema."
[[AC:LiveActionTV]]
* Website/SFDebris's Chuck Sonnenburg rates ''Franchise/StarTrek'' episodes on a 1-10 scale, with ratings relative to the series quality as a whole: an average-quality episode gets a 5, and he considers a [[Series/StarTrekDeepSpaceNine DS9]] 5 a solid episode whereas a [[Series/StarTrekVoyager VOY]] 5 is generic schlock. He has not done this to date with ''Series/StarTrekDiscovery'', however, since the show is still airing. Other shows' episodes get ratings varying from "Must See" (MythArc episodes get this, even if mediocre) to "Strongly Recommended", "Recommended", "Fine", "Watchable", and "Skip".
[[AC:{{Music}}]]
* [[WebVideo/TheNeedleDrop Anthony Fantano]] uses a 0 - 10 numerical scale when rating albums, but qualifies the numbers with "light", "decent", or "strong". He also uses "NOT GOOD" as its own rating for albums that he didn't have high expectations for and which did end up being complete duds in his opinion.
[[AC:{{Radio}}]]
* Greg Kot and Jim [=DeRogatis=], hosts of Creator/{{NPR}}'s music review show ''Sound Opinions'', give albums "Buy It", "Try It", or "Trash It" ratings. They've also sometimes given the rating "Burn It" (as in with a CD burner, not a bonfire).
[[AC:{{Toys}}]]
* Website/YouTube toy reviewer [[https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC70F5cxWj0AeZfbbjJg-eGg Jobby the Hong]] has a 5-tier scale based on small Franchise/{{Godzilla}} figures interacting with the subject of the review. The scale is:
** Classic Godzilla, 2014 Godzilla and Mechagodzilla Kiryu kiss the figure.
** Classic Godzilla and 2014 Godzilla kiss the figure.
** Classic Godzilla kisses the figure.
** Classic Godzilla hugs the figure.
** Classic Godzilla looks at the figure with disgust.
[[AC:VideoGames]]
* In his "Dunkview" videos, LetsPlay/VideoGameDunkey awards "dunk points" to games, though usually not in any seriousness whatsoever, and amazing games can be rated 0/5 (to date the only ''serious'' 0/5 game rating he's ever given has been ''VideoGame/KingdomHearts3''), while lackluster ones ([[VideoGame/{{Knack}} Knack 2]] [[CatchPhrase bay]][[MemeticMutation beeeeeeee]]) can get 10/5 (for the graphics alone, even).
* WebVideo/TheCompletionist uses a rating scale based on how much he feels the game in question is worth investing the time to complete it. The scale is
** '''Complete it'''
** '''Finish it'''
** '''Play it'''
** '''Look at it'''
** '''Donate it''' (formerly '''Burn it''')
** Occasionaly, half-ratings would get names like "plook at it"
* WebVideo/ProJared rates every game [BLANK] out of ten, where the blank can be filled with pretty much everything except a number from 1 to 10. These scores are always symbolic for something which he elaborates on in his final thoughts.
* Webvideo/GameXplain abandoned their original numbered rating system in favor of terms like "loved it" and "liked-a-lot", to communicate that their reviews are purely the subjective opinion of the reviewer. They haven't given an official list of their ratings as they didn't want people to correlate them to a numbered system, and it gives them the freedom to add new ratings when necessary.
* Creator/{{Seanbaby}} is notable for having a different rating scale in almost every article he writes (especially on massive ValuesDissonance in old comics). For instance, his [[http://www.seanbaby.com/nes/nes/w20-1.htm 20 Worst NES games]] are rated on (among others) Graphics, Fun, [[http://www.seanbaby.com/nes/nes/w20-19.htm Jesus Power]] / [[http://www.seanbaby.com/nes/nes/w20-18.htm Desecration Of A Classic]] / [[http://www.seanbaby.com/nes/nes/w20-10.htm Flying Human Chunk Rating]].
[[AC:Multi-media]]
* WebOriginal/MylesPower ranks Woo, [[AllNaturalSnakeOil Quackery]] and ConspiracyTheorist books, movies and such using three scales (per review), each going from zero to five.
** '''Tinfoil Hats''': How out there the content is.
** '''David Shuckeman faces''': How much bad science there is.
** '''Music/KennyLoggins faces''': How dangerous it is. (replaced Hulk faces which were used to rate how angry the work made him, but were retired for being too subjective)
!!In-universe examples:
[[AC:VideoGames]]
* In ''Franchise/DragonAge'', the magazine ''The Randy Dowager's Quarterly'' publishes book reviews with a rating scale based on the number of scarves fluttered in shock.
----
Index: CriticismTropes, StockPhrases
While many media reviewers stick to a familiar scale of letters, numbers, or simply stars when rating what they're reviewing, some like to mix things up, either by using a completely unique scale or by putting a spin on an old scale that makes it fresh and easily identifiable to that person. This makes them stand out from other reviewers and can be a draw to their work. It's even more of a point of recognition if these scales/systems incorporate a CatchPhrase or something similar.
Can sometimes incorporate BrokeTheRatingScale in unusual cases.
Compare: AbstractScale (measuring something that can't really be measured in the first place) and HiroshimaAsAUnitOfMeasure (using comparisons as a means of measurement).
'''Needs examples'''
----
!!Examples (sorted by the media being reviewed):
%%
%% EDITOR'S NOTE: Please describe all scales from best to worst.
%%
[[AC:{{Anime}} and {{Manga}}]]
* WebVideo/{{Arkada}} formerly combined a numerical score that was a rough aggregate of various factors with a unique overall rating system, but eventually went solely with the overall ratings as the scoring was cumbersome and often confusing and contradictory between reviews. His scale is:
** '''Certified Frosty''': As he puts it: "A rating reserved only for the best of the best and those shows too important to ignore."
** '''Buy It''': A very good show that's worth shelling out the money to add to your collection.
** '''Stream It''': Worth watching, but only worth buying if you really dug it.
** '''Skip It''': Generally not worth your time.
** '''Fuck It''': Usually reserved for titles that are a complete failure for one reason or another. ''[[Manga/NoMatterHowILookAtItItsYouGuysFaultImNotPopular WataMote]]'', while it had some merit, earned this rating mainly due to its unbearable cringiness.
[[AC:{{Film}}]]
* ''Series/SiskelAndEbert'' is the TropeMaker. Gene Siskel and Creator/RogerEbert rated films with a simple thumbs up/down, and this, combined with their lively discussions/arguments supporting their decisions, made the show almost a cultural touchstone for movie reviewing prior to Website/RottenTomatoes.
* Website/RottenTomatoes is one of the most ubiquitous examples in today's media. It samples a collection of reviews from different sources and assigns each review a "Fresh" or "Rotten" designation based on whether or not it was favorable to its movie, then tabulates those and assigns a movie an overall "Fresh" or "Rotten" rating with a corresponding red tomato icon or green splat icon. To earn a "Fresh" rating, the percentage of positive reviews has to meet or exceed 60% of the total, with movies that are at or over 75% being designated "Certified Fresh".
* Creator/JeremyJahns has [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqEZXS4CMmg a descriptor-based scale]] that he admits is loosely applicable and very context-specific outside of the top and bottom tiers, and that he created mainly for fun when his subscriber count was low:
** '''Awesometacular''': Excellent, although maybe not perfect.
** '''Worth Buying on Blu-Ray'''
** '''A Good Time (No Alcohol Required)'''[[note]]Sometimes with the addendum "At matinee price"[[/note]]
** '''A Good Time If You're Drunk'''[[note]]This one can be good or bad depending on the context of the review.[[/note]]
** '''Not Going to Remember in T-Minus [Short Period of Time]'''
** '''Dogshit''': A truly bad film.
** '''Nothing''': Only used for about two to three films so far, used to describe films abysmal in the sense that they feel blank or unfinished.
** '''Tour de Force''': A rarely-used one, awarded to films that might actually be good but that he finds too stuffy/arty/pretentious.
* While WebAnimation/{{Spill}} was still an active website, its participants rated movies on the following scale:
** '''Better Than Sex!''': The BrokeTheRatingScale rating, given for films which are beyond the expectation for a good film and magnificently set a new cinematic standard.
** '''Full Price!''': Genuinely good films according to current standards, with few to no flaws.
** '''Matinee!''': Entertaining films that are worth seeing in the theater but are flawed enough to only warrant a matinee ticket.
** '''Rental''': An okay movie, something not worth paying movie ticket prices to see.
** '''Some Ole Bullshit!''': Films that are either poorly made or simply bad, but not to the point of being horrible.
** '''Fuck You!!!''': An unofficial rating, the equivalent of the Better Than Sex rating for bad films. These films are bad to the point of being offensive to the viewers and the Spill crew, often in more ways than one. They added this one to the list after realizing that the Creator/SeltzerAndFriedberg films [[BrokeTheRatingScale were beyond the badness of the Some Ole Bullshit! rating]].
* Mr. Cranky, while it was still online, was unusual in that it took a satirically cynical attitude toward reviewing movies and used bombs as its baseline scale. ''All'' movies were deemed bad; the rating was based on ''how'' bad they were. Thus, their scale was:
** '''One bomb''': Almost tolerable.
** '''Two bombs''': Consistently annoying.
** '''Three bombs''': Will require therapy after viewing.
** '''Four bombs''': As good as a poke in the eye with a sharp stick.
** '''Ka-BOOM!''': So godawful that it ruptured the very fabric of space and time with the sheer overpowering force of its mediocrity.
** '''Nuke''': Proof that Jesus died in vain.
* ''Zombie Movies: The Ultimate Guide'' has as its ratings:
** '''Highly Recommended''': "The absolute best in zombie films."
** '''Recommended''': "Solid, entertaining pictures that should satisfy viewers."
** '''At Your Own Risk''': "You may appreciate some of these, but don't count on a classic."
** '''Avoid At All Costs''': "Unless you're a serious fan, you don't need to see these."
** '''So Bad It's Good''': "Great stuff for fans of bad cinema."
[[AC:LiveActionTV]]
* Website/SFDebris's Chuck Sonnenburg rates ''Franchise/StarTrek'' episodes on a 1-10 scale, with ratings relative to the series quality as a whole: an average-quality episode gets a 5, and he considers a [[Series/StarTrekDeepSpaceNine DS9]] 5 a solid episode whereas a [[Series/StarTrekVoyager VOY]] 5 is generic schlock. He has not done this to date with ''Series/StarTrekDiscovery'', however, since the show is still airing. Other shows' episodes get ratings varying from "Must See" (MythArc episodes get this, even if mediocre) to "Strongly Recommended", "Recommended", "Fine", "Watchable", and "Skip".
[[AC:{{Music}}]]
* [[WebVideo/TheNeedleDrop Anthony Fantano]] uses a 0 - 10 numerical scale when rating albums, but qualifies the numbers with "light", "decent", or "strong". He also uses "NOT GOOD" as its own rating for albums that he didn't have high expectations for and which did end up being complete duds in his opinion.
[[AC:{{Radio}}]]
* Greg Kot and Jim [=DeRogatis=], hosts of Creator/{{NPR}}'s music review show ''Sound Opinions'', give albums "Buy It", "Try It", or "Trash It" ratings. They've also sometimes given the rating "Burn It" (as in with a CD burner, not a bonfire).
[[AC:{{Toys}}]]
* Website/YouTube toy reviewer [[https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC70F5cxWj0AeZfbbjJg-eGg Jobby the Hong]] has a 5-tier scale based on small Franchise/{{Godzilla}} figures interacting with the subject of the review. The scale is:
** Classic Godzilla, 2014 Godzilla and Mechagodzilla Kiryu kiss the figure.
** Classic Godzilla and 2014 Godzilla kiss the figure.
** Classic Godzilla kisses the figure.
** Classic Godzilla hugs the figure.
** Classic Godzilla looks at the figure with disgust.
[[AC:VideoGames]]
* In his "Dunkview" videos, LetsPlay/VideoGameDunkey awards "dunk points" to games, though usually not in any seriousness whatsoever, and amazing games can be rated 0/5 (to date the only ''serious'' 0/5 game rating he's ever given has been ''VideoGame/KingdomHearts3''), while lackluster ones ([[VideoGame/{{Knack}} Knack 2]] [[CatchPhrase bay]][[MemeticMutation beeeeeeee]]) can get 10/5 (for the graphics alone, even).
* WebVideo/TheCompletionist uses a rating scale based on how much he feels the game in question is worth investing the time to complete it. The scale is
** '''Complete it'''
** '''Finish it'''
** '''Play it'''
** '''Look at it'''
** '''Donate it''' (formerly '''Burn it''')
** Occasionaly, half-ratings would get names like "plook at it"
* WebVideo/ProJared rates every game [BLANK] out of ten, where the blank can be filled with pretty much everything except a number from 1 to 10. These scores are always symbolic for something which he elaborates on in his final thoughts.
* Webvideo/GameXplain abandoned their original numbered rating system in favor of terms like "loved it" and "liked-a-lot", to communicate that their reviews are purely the subjective opinion of the reviewer. They haven't given an official list of their ratings as they didn't want people to correlate them to a numbered system, and it gives them the freedom to add new ratings when necessary.
* Creator/{{Seanbaby}} is notable for having a different rating scale in almost every article he writes (especially on massive ValuesDissonance in old comics). For instance, his [[http://www.seanbaby.com/nes/nes/w20-1.htm 20 Worst NES games]] are rated on (among others) Graphics, Fun, [[http://www.seanbaby.com/nes/nes/w20-19.htm Jesus Power]] / [[http://www.seanbaby.com/nes/nes/w20-18.htm Desecration Of A Classic]] / [[http://www.seanbaby.com/nes/nes/w20-10.htm Flying Human Chunk Rating]].
[[AC:Multi-media]]
* WebOriginal/MylesPower ranks Woo, [[AllNaturalSnakeOil Quackery]] and ConspiracyTheorist books, movies and such using three scales (per review), each going from zero to five.
** '''Tinfoil Hats''': How out there the content is.
** '''David Shuckeman faces''': How much bad science there is.
** '''Music/KennyLoggins faces''': How dangerous it is. (replaced Hulk faces which were used to rate how angry the work made him, but were retired for being too subjective)
!!In-universe examples:
[[AC:VideoGames]]
* In ''Franchise/DragonAge'', the magazine ''The Randy Dowager's Quarterly'' publishes book reviews with a rating scale based on the number of scarves fluttered in shock.
----
Index: CriticismTropes, StockPhrases
