Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / CircularReasoning

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* A Woozle is a similar concept where one tries to find the source of a claim and finds a relatively tight knit group citing each other at the end of the rabbit hole instead of primary sources or research.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** On the other side of religious debates it's not uncommon to find atheists using a circular argument against the possibility that miracles can happen. The argument, famously put forward by philosopher David Hume, uses the supposed fact that there has never been any proof of a miracle as a reason to believe that accounts of miracles cannot be accurately describing actual miracles.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''LightNovel/TheCreationAlchemistEnjoysFreedom'', we have the case of Duke Bragas Regus. He lives in the Dolgaria Empire that fiercely embodies KlingonScientistsGetNoRespect. As such, he sees non-combat ''god-given'' professions like [Alchemy] as inherently incompetent and useless. His son Thor is an alchemist, as learned through a magical appraisal. This prompts Duke Regus to do everything possible to make Thor appear useless, squashing the boy's chances of being useful and driving his accomplishments into obscurity from everyone, especially himself.

to:

* In ''LightNovel/TheCreationAlchemistEnjoysFreedom'', ''Literature/TheCreationAlchemistEnjoysFreedom'', we have the case of Duke Bragas Regus. He lives in the Dolgaria Empire that fiercely embodies KlingonScientistsGetNoRespect. As such, he sees non-combat ''god-given'' professions like [Alchemy] as inherently incompetent and useless. His son Thor is an alchemist, as learned through a magical appraisal. This prompts Duke Regus to do everything possible to make Thor appear useless, squashing the boy's chances of being useful and driving his accomplishments into obscurity from everyone, especially himself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--> '''Bill''': The truth is, Wyld Stallyns will never be a super band until we have Eddie Van Halen on guitar.
--> '''Ted''': Yes, Bill. But, I do not believe we will get Eddie Van Halen until we have a triumphant video.
--> '''Bill''': Ted, it's pointless to have a triumphant video before we even have decent instruments.
--> '''Ted''': Well, how can we have decent instruments when we don't really even know how to play?
--> '''Bill''': That is why we ''need'' Eddie Van Halen!
--> '''Ted''': And ''that'' is why we need a triumphant video.
--> '''[[IdiotHero Bill and Ted]]''': EXCELLENT! (''air guitar solo'')

to:

--> '''Bill''': The truth is, Wyld Stallyns will never be a super band until we have Eddie Van Halen on guitar.
-->
guitar.\\
'''Ted''': Yes, Bill. But, I do not believe we will get Eddie Van Halen until we have a triumphant video.
-->
video.\\
'''Bill''': Ted, it's pointless to have a triumphant video before we even have decent instruments.
-->
instruments.\\
'''Ted''': Well, how can we have decent instruments when we don't really even know how to play?
-->
play?\\
'''Bill''': That is why we ''need'' Eddie Van Halen!
-->
Halen!\\
'''Ted''': And ''that'' is why we need a triumphant video.
-->
video.\\
'''[[IdiotHero Bill and Ted]]''': EXCELLENT! (''air guitar solo'')



--> '''Yossarian:''' Is Orr crazy?
--> '''Dr. 'Doc' Daneeka:''' ''Of course'' he is. He has to be crazy to keep flying after all the close calls he's had.
--> '''Yossarian:''' Why can't you ground him?
--> '''Doc Daneeka:''' I can, but first he has to ask me.
--> '''Yossarian:''' That's all he's gotta do to be grounded?
--> '''Doc Daneeka:''' That's all.
--> '''Yossarian:''' Then you can ground him?
--> '''Doc Daneeka:''' No. Then I cannot ground him.
--> '''Yossarian:''' Aah!
--> '''Doc Daneeka:''' There's a CATCH!
--> '''Yossarian:''' A catch?
--> '''Doc Daneeka:''' Sure. Catch-22. Anyone who wants to get out of combat isn't really crazy, so I can't ground him.
--> '''Yossarian:''' Okay, let me see if I've got this straight. In order to be grounded, I've got to be crazy. And I must be crazy to keep flying. But if I ask to be grounded, that means I'm not crazy anymore, and I have to keep flying.\\

to:

--> '''Yossarian:''' -->'''Yossarian:''' Is Orr crazy?
-->
crazy?\\
'''Dr. 'Doc' Daneeka:''' ''Of course'' he is. He has to be crazy to keep flying after all the close calls he's had.
-->
had.\\
'''Yossarian:''' Why can't you ground him?
-->
him?\\
'''Doc Daneeka:''' I can, but first he has to ask me.
-->
me.\\
'''Yossarian:''' That's all he's gotta do to be grounded?
-->
grounded?\\
'''Doc Daneeka:''' That's all.
-->
all.\\
'''Yossarian:''' Then you can ground him?
-->
him?\\
'''Doc Daneeka:''' No. Then I cannot ground him.
-->
him.\\
'''Yossarian:''' Aah!
-->
Aah!\\
'''Doc Daneeka:''' There's a CATCH!
-->
CATCH!\\
'''Yossarian:''' A catch?
-->
catch?\\
'''Doc Daneeka:''' Sure. Catch-22. Anyone who wants to get out of combat isn't really crazy, so I can't ground him.
-->
him.\\
'''Yossarian:''' Okay, let me see if I've got this straight. In order to be grounded, I've got to be crazy. And I must be crazy to keep flying. But if I ask to be grounded, that means I'm not crazy anymore, and I have to keep flying.\\



* ''Literature/TheSchoolForGoodMothers'': The mothers are practicing how to talk to their children using [[RidiculouslyHumanRobots robotic dolls]] as proxies. An instructor tells Beth that her voice should be "as light and lovely as a cloud". When Beth asks how does a cloud sound, Ms. Russo says it sounds like a mother. This does not make sense to Beth, but Ms. Russo tells her that mothering is about a feeling, not about sense.

to:

* ''Literature/TheSchoolForGoodMothers'': The mothers are practicing how to talk to their children using [[RidiculouslyHumanRobots robotic dolls]] as proxies. An instructor tells Beth that her voice should be "as light and lovely as a cloud". When Beth asks how does a cloud sound, Ms. Russo says it sounds like a mother. This does not make sense to Beth, but Ms. Russo tells her that [[DontThinkFeel mothering is about a feeling, not about sense.sense]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Literature/TheSchoolForGoodMothers'': The mothers are practicing how to talk to their children using robotic dolls dolls as proxies. One of the instructors tells Beth that her voice should be "as light and lovely as a cloud". When Beth asks how does a cloud sound, Ms. Russo says it sounds like a mother. This does not make sense to Beth, but Ms. Russo tells her that mothering is about a feeling, not about sense.

to:

* ''Literature/TheSchoolForGoodMothers'': The mothers are practicing how to talk to their children using [[RidiculouslyHumanRobots robotic dolls dolls dolls]] as proxies. One of the instructors An instructor tells Beth that her voice should be "as light and lovely as a cloud". When Beth asks how does a cloud sound, Ms. Russo says it sounds like a mother. This does not make sense to Beth, but Ms. Russo tells her that mothering is about a feeling, not about sense.

Added: 418

Changed: 6

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--> '''Yossarian:''' Okay, let me see if I've got this straight. In order to be grounded, I've got to be crazy. And I must be crazy to keep flying. But if I ask to be grounded, that means I'm not crazy anymore, and I have to keep flying.
--> '''Doc Daneeka:''' You got it, that's Catch-22.

to:

--> '''Yossarian:''' Okay, let me see if I've got this straight. In order to be grounded, I've got to be crazy. And I must be crazy to keep flying. But if I ask to be grounded, that means I'm not crazy anymore, and I have to keep flying.
-->
flying.\\
'''Doc Daneeka:''' You got it, that's Catch-22.


Added DiffLines:

* ''Literature/TheSchoolForGoodMothers'': The mothers are practicing how to talk to their children using robotic dolls dolls as proxies. One of the instructors tells Beth that her voice should be "as light and lovely as a cloud". When Beth asks how does a cloud sound, Ms. Russo says it sounds like a mother. This does not make sense to Beth, but Ms. Russo tells her that mothering is about a feeling, not about sense.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''WesternAnimation/{{Arthur}}: In "Arthur's Big Hit" when Sue Ellen spots Binky hiding from Arthur in the bushes, she asks what he's doing there. Binky answers that he's avoiding Arthur so he doesn't have to hit him. Sue Ellen then asks why Binky wants to hit Arthur, to which Binky replies that he ''doesn't'', which is why he's avoiding him. Since Binky never explains to her that his friends have threatened to kick him out of the club if he doesn't hit Arthur the next time he sees him, Sue Ellen is left confused by what appears to be this trope.

to:

* ''WesternAnimation/{{Arthur}}: ''WesternAnimation/{{Arthur}}'': In "Arthur's Big Hit" when Sue Ellen spots Binky hiding from Arthur in the bushes, she asks what he's doing there. Binky answers that he's avoiding Arthur so he doesn't have to hit him. Sue Ellen then asks why Binky wants to hit Arthur, to which Binky replies that he ''doesn't'', which is why he's avoiding him. Since Binky never explains to her that his friends have threatened to kick him out of the club if he doesn't hit Arthur the next time he sees him, Sue Ellen is left confused by what appears to be this trope.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''WesternAnimation/{{Arthur}}: In "Arthur's Big Hit" when Sue Ellen spots Binky hiding from Arthur in the bushes, she asks what he's doing there. Binky answers that he's avoiding Arthur so he doesn't have to hit him. Sue Ellen then asks why Binky wants to hit Arthur, to which Binky replies that he ''doesn't'', which is why he's avoiding him. Since Binky never explains to her that his friends have threatened to kick him out of the club if he doesn't hit Arthur the next time he sees him, Sue Ellen is left confused by what appears to be this trope.
-->'''Sue Ellen:''' Hmm. ''[walks away]'' Boys...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Example


The simplest form of this is a tautology. See also ShapedLikeItself and FamousForBeingFamous. A similar concept is a logic loop, a type of LogicBomb where a series of thoughts leads to itself.

to:

The simplest form of this is a tautology. tautology (like defining "sports writer" as "a writer who writes about sports".) See also ShapedLikeItself and FamousForBeingFamous. A similar concept is a logic loop, a type of LogicBomb where a series of thoughts leads to itself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In ''Literature/WakingUpAsASpaceship'', countries discriminate against the artificially created Nekomi race, chase them out of their homes, deny them legal employment, and leave them no option but to turn to crime then use the fact that they're criminals as a result to justify the discrimination in the first place. Kuon, first mate of the protagonist, gets called out on it when Abyssal rescues a Nekomi from space-pirates and Kuon objects, lampshading the circular reasoning.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
added missing word "theory" after "conspiracy" in passage about conspiracy theories


* A fundamental part of any conspiracy is that [[AbsenceOfEvidence the evidence supporting the theory doesn't exist]] because the ones responsible are suppressing the evidence. The lack of evidence proves their guilt, because if they weren't guilty, they wouldn't have any reason to hide the evidence. Also, any evidence that proves the conspiracy theory ''isn't'' true is ''actually'' proof that the conspiracy goes ''even deeper than previously thought''.

to:

* A fundamental part of any conspiracy theory is that [[AbsenceOfEvidence the evidence supporting the theory doesn't exist]] because the ones responsible are suppressing the evidence. The lack of evidence proves their guilt, because if they weren't guilty, they wouldn't have any reason to hide the evidence. Also, any evidence that proves the conspiracy theory ''isn't'' true is ''actually'' proof that the conspiracy goes ''even deeper than previously thought''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder: Anime and Manga]]
* In ''LightNovel/TheCreationAlchemistEnjoysFreedom'', we have the case of Duke Bragas Regus. He lives in the Dolgaria Empire that fiercely embodies KlingonScientistsGetNoRespect. As such, he sees non-combat ''god-given'' professions like [Alchemy] as inherently incompetent and useless. His son Thor is an alchemist, as learned through a magical appraisal. This prompts Duke Regus to do everything possible to make Thor appear useless, squashing the boy's chances of being useful and driving his accomplishments into obscurity from everyone, especially himself.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
not a circular reasoning


* A recurring argument from those against non cis-heterosexual couples adopting children is that it would result in the children getting bullied at school and in other environments in which they interact with peers. The main reason children are currently getting bullied for that reason in the first place is the bullies (both children and adults) either having been taught at some point in their lives that having non cis-heterosexual parents makes children acceptable targets or not being corrected by authority figures if they come to that conclusion on their own. Such environments are partly fostered, intentionally or not, by people who think only cis-heterosexual couples should be raising children.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Literature/TheSchoolForGoodAndEvil'': In ''A World Without Princes'', the school is divided into a Boy side and a Girl side. Agatha needs to cross to the Boy side, but finds the way blocked by the magic barrier, which defines each side in terms of the other.
-->"Try all you want. You won't trick me again," her reflection said. "You're obviously a Girl."\\
"And what makes a Girl?" Agatha asked.\\
"All the things a Boy is not."\\
Agatha frowned. "And what makes a Boy?"\\
"All the things a Girl is not."\\
"But you still haven't told me what a Boy or Girl ''is''."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* According to Creator/IsaacAsimov, this was used in [[TheDungAges the Middle Ages]] as an excuse not to educate women; all intelligent people know Latin, but women don't know Latin so they must be stupid, which means that there's no point in teaching them Latin (or anything else).[[note]]Actually, more ladies were literate back then than men, to the point of MoralGuardians complaining about the then-popular romance literature, but the circularity still stands.[[/note]] This is also the fallacy of confusing knowledge with intelligence, which [[InsultFriendlyFire also]] underpins large parts of so-called "[[UsefulNotes/IQTesting intelligence tests]]".

to:

* According to Creator/IsaacAsimov, this was used in [[TheDungAges the Middle Ages]] TheMiddleAges as an excuse not to educate women; all intelligent people know Latin, SmartPeopleKnowLatin, but women don't know Latin so they must be stupid, which means that there's no point in teaching them Latin (or anything else).[[note]]Actually, more ladies were literate back then than men, to the point of MoralGuardians complaining about the then-popular romance literature, but the circularity still stands.[[/note]] This is also the fallacy of confusing knowledge with intelligence, which [[InsultFriendlyFire also]] underpins large parts of so-called "[[UsefulNotes/IQTesting intelligence tests]]".

Removed: 448

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
There's an explanation so it's not circular reasoning.


* 'STI's (Sexually Transmitted Infections) are transferred sexually. If someone has an STI, they got it through sexual contact. So, where did the first 'STI's come from?
** Like all other viruses and bacteria, they evolved this mode of infection through random mutation. Many of them most likely started out as being transferable through blood, sputa or excreta and then picked up a genetic trait that allowed them to survive in other bodily fluids.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The internment of Japanese prisoners in the US was justified, in part, by General John [=DeWitt=] because "The very fact that no sabotage has taken place to date is a disturbing and confirming indication [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_L._DeWitt#Internment_of_Japanese_Americans that such action will be taken."]]

to:

* The internment of Japanese prisoners in the US was justified, in part, by General John [=DeWitt=] because "The very fact that no sabotage has taken place to date is a [[ItsQuietTooQuiet disturbing and confirming confirming]] indication [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_L._DeWitt#Internment_of_Japanese_Americans that such action will be taken."]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* According to Creator/IsaacAsimov, this was used in [[TheDungAges the Middle Ages]] as an excuse not to educate women; all intelligent people know Latin, but women don't know Latin so they must be stupid, which means that there's no point in teaching them Latin (or anything else)[[note]]Actually, more ladies were literate back then than men, to the point of MoralGuardians complaining about the then-popular romance literature, but the circularity still stands.[[/note]]. This is also the fallacy of confusing knowledge with intelligence, which [[InsultFriendlyFire also]] underpins large parts of so-called "[[UsefulNotes/IQTesting intelligence tests]]".

to:

* According to Creator/IsaacAsimov, this was used in [[TheDungAges the Middle Ages]] as an excuse not to educate women; all intelligent people know Latin, but women don't know Latin so they must be stupid, which means that there's no point in teaching them Latin (or anything else)[[note]]Actually, else).[[note]]Actually, more ladies were literate back then than men, to the point of MoralGuardians complaining about the then-popular romance literature, but the circularity still stands.[[/note]]. [[/note]] This is also the fallacy of confusing knowledge with intelligence, which [[InsultFriendlyFire also]] underpins large parts of so-called "[[UsefulNotes/IQTesting intelligence tests]]".



* The internment of Japanese prisoners in the US was justified, in part, by General John [=DeWitt=] because "The very fact that no sabotage has taken place to date is a disturbing and confirming indication [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_L._DeWitt#Internment_of_Japanese_Americans that such action will be taken]]."

to:

* The internment of Japanese prisoners in the US was justified, in part, by General John [=DeWitt=] because "The very fact that no sabotage has taken place to date is a disturbing and confirming indication [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_L._DeWitt#Internment_of_Japanese_Americans that such action will be taken]]."taken."]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Like all other viruses and bacteria, they evolved this mode of infection through random mutation. Many of them most likely started out as being transferable through blood, sputa or excreta and then picked up a genetic trait that allowed them to survive in other bodily fluids.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A recurring argument from those against non cis-heterosexual couples adopting children is that it would result in the children getting bullied at school and in other environments in which they interact with peers. The main reason children are currently getting bullied for that reason in the first place is the is the bullies (both children and adults) either having been taught at some point in their lives that having non cis-heterosexual parents makes children acceptable targets or not being corrected by authority figures if they come to that conclusion on their own. Such an environment will be partly fostered, intentionally or not, by people who think only cis-heterosexual couples should be raising children.

to:

* A recurring argument from those against non cis-heterosexual couples adopting children is that it would result in the children getting bullied at school and in other environments in which they interact with peers. The main reason children are currently getting bullied for that reason in the first place is the is the bullies (both children and adults) either having been taught at some point in their lives that having non cis-heterosexual parents makes children acceptable targets or not being corrected by authority figures if they come to that conclusion on their own. Such an environment will be environments are partly fostered, intentionally or not, by people who think only cis-heterosexual couples should be raising children.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A recurring argument from those against non cis-heterosexual couples adopting children is that it would result in the children getting bullied at school and in other environments in which they interact with peers. The main reason children are currently getting bullied for that reason in the first place is the is the bullies (both children and adults) either having been taught at some point in their lives that having non cis-heterosexual parents makes children acceptable targets or not being corrected by authority figures if they come to that conclusion on their own. Such an environment will be partly fostered, intentionally or not, by people who think only cis-heterosexual couples should be caring for children.

to:

* A recurring argument from those against non cis-heterosexual couples adopting children is that it would result in the children getting bullied at school and in other environments in which they interact with peers. The main reason children are currently getting bullied for that reason in the first place is the is the bullies (both children and adults) either having been taught at some point in their lives that having non cis-heterosexual parents makes children acceptable targets or not being corrected by authority figures if they come to that conclusion on their own. Such an environment will be partly fostered, intentionally or not, by people who think only cis-heterosexual couples should be caring for raising children.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A recurring argument from those against non cis-heterosexual couples adopting children is that it would result in the children getting bullied at school. The main reason children are currently getting bullied for that reason in the first place is the is the bullies (both children and adults) either having been taught at some point in their lives that having non cis-heterosexual parents makes children acceptable targets or not being corrected by authority figures if they come to that conclusion on their own. Such an environment will be partly fostered, intentionally or not, by people who think only cis-heterosexual couples should be caring for children.

to:

* A recurring argument from those against non cis-heterosexual couples adopting children is that it would result in the children getting bullied at school.school and in other environments in which they interact with peers. The main reason children are currently getting bullied for that reason in the first place is the is the bullies (both children and adults) either having been taught at some point in their lives that having non cis-heterosexual parents makes children acceptable targets or not being corrected by authority figures if they come to that conclusion on their own. Such an environment will be partly fostered, intentionally or not, by people who think only cis-heterosexual couples should be caring for children.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A recurring argument from those against non cis-heterosexual couples adopting children is that it would result in the children getting bullied at school. The main reason children are currently getting bullied for that reason in the first place is the other children being taught ''by the adults in their lives'' that having non cis-heterosexual parents makes them acceptable targets. Any adults doing the same are ultimately in a similar situation.

to:

* A recurring argument from those against non cis-heterosexual couples adopting children is that it would result in the children getting bullied at school. The main reason children are currently getting bullied for that reason in the first place is the other is the bullies (both children being and adults) either having been taught ''by the adults at some point in their lives'' lives that having non cis-heterosexual parents makes them children acceptable targets. Any adults doing the same are ultimately in a similar situation.targets or not being corrected by authority figures if they come to that conclusion on their own. Such an environment will be partly fostered, intentionally or not, by people who think only cis-heterosexual couples should be caring for children.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A recurring argument from those against non cis-heterosexual couples adopting children is that it would result in the children getting bullied at school. The main reason children are currently getting bullied for that reason in the first place is the other children being taught ''by the adults in their lives'' that having non cis-heterosexual parents makes them an acceptable target. Any adults doing the same are ultimately in a similar situation.

to:

* A recurring argument from those against non cis-heterosexual couples adopting children is that it would result in the children getting bullied at school. The main reason children are currently getting bullied for that reason in the first place is the other children being taught ''by the adults in their lives'' that having non cis-heterosexual parents makes them an acceptable target.targets. Any adults doing the same are ultimately in a similar situation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A recurring argument from those against non cis-heterosexual couples adopting children is that it would result in the children getting bullied at school. The main children are currently get bullied for that reason in the first place is the other children being taught ''by the adults in their lives'' that having non cis-heterosexual parents makes them an acceptable target. Any adults doing the same are ultimately in a similar situation.

to:

* A recurring argument from those against non cis-heterosexual couples adopting children is that it would result in the children getting bullied at school. The main reason children are currently get getting bullied for that reason in the first place is the other children being taught ''by the adults in their lives'' that having non cis-heterosexual parents makes them an acceptable target. Any adults doing the same are ultimately in a similar situation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A recurring argument from those against non cis-heterosexual couples adopting children is that it would result in the children getting bullied at school. The main reason those children would be bullied for that reason in the first place is the other children being taught ''by the adults in their lives'' that having non cis-heterosexual parents makes a child an acceptable target. Any adults doing the same would be simply such children all grown up.

to:

* A recurring argument from those against non cis-heterosexual couples adopting children is that it would result in the children getting bullied at school. The main reason those children would be are currently get bullied for that reason in the first place is the other children being taught ''by the adults in their lives'' that having non cis-heterosexual parents makes a child them an acceptable target. Any adults doing the same would be simply such children all grown up.are ultimately in a similar situation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* A recurring argument from those against non cis-heterosexual couples adopting children is that it would result in the children getting bullied at school. The main reason those children would be bullied for that reason in the first place is the other children being taught ''by the adults in their lives'' that having non cis-heterosexual parents makes a child an acceptable target. Any adults doing the same would be simply such children all grown up.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Literature/TheLittlePrince encounters a tippler on his way to Earth. When asked why he drinks, the tippler explains that [[DrowningMySorrows he wants to forget]]. When asked what he wants to forget, he says that he wants to forget his shame. When asked what he's ashamed of, he explains that he is ashamed of his drinking problem. The Prince later meets a businessman who thinks the stars belong to him, and the Prince notes that he reasons in a similar way. The value of owning stars is that they make him rich, and he wants to be rich so he can buy more stars.

to:

* Literature/TheLittlePrince encounters a tippler on his way to Earth. When asked why he drinks, the tippler explains that [[DrowningMySorrows he wants to forget]]. When asked what he wants to forget, he says that he wants to forget his Forget what? His shame. When asked what he's And what's he ashamed of, he explains that he is ashamed of his drinking problem.of? Of drinking. The Prince later meets a businessman who thinks the stars belong to him, and the Prince notes that he reasons in a similar way. The value of owning stars is that they make him rich, and he wants to be rich so he can buy more stars.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not an example, the actual exchange is quite different to how it's quoted here. He provides a separate rationale: "Your limp's really bad when you walk, but you don't ask for a chair when you stand, like you've forgotten about it, so that's at least partly psychosomatic".


* ''Series/{{Sherlock}}'': PlayedForLaughs when Sherlock is [[SherlockScan scanning]] John.
-->'''Sherlock:''' You have a limp, which your therapist believes is psychosomatic--\\
'''John:''' How do you know I have a therapist?\\
'''Sherlock:''' You have a psychosomatic limp; of ''course'' you have a therapist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Top