Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 37,40 (click to see context) from:
* LockingMacGyverInTheStoreCupboard: [[spoiler: Blair.]]
* MauveShirt: Bennings.
* MonsterInTheIce: And why it's a bad idea to thaw one out.
* MysteriousAntarctica: The setting.
* MauveShirt: Bennings.
* MonsterInTheIce: And why it's a bad idea to thaw one out.
* MysteriousAntarctica: The setting.
to:
%% * LockingMacGyverInTheStoreCupboard: [[spoiler: Blair.]]
%% * MauveShirt: Bennings.
%% * MonsterInTheIce: And why it's a bad idea to thaw one out.
%% * MysteriousAntarctica: The setting.
%% * MauveShirt: Bennings.
%% * MonsterInTheIce: And why it's a bad idea to thaw one out.
%% * MysteriousAntarctica: The setting.
Changed line(s) 52 (click to see context) from:
* VoluntaryShapeshifting - and how.
to:
%% * VoluntaryShapeshifting - and how.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No longer a trope.
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* AlienHair: The creature has "[[YouGottaHaveBlueHair blue hair]] [[WildHair like crawling worms]]".
to:
* AlienHair: The creature has "[[YouGottaHaveBlueHair blue hair]] "blue hair [[WildHair like crawling worms]]".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* MonsterInTheIce: And why it's a bad idea to thaw one out.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Badass Mustache and Badass Beard are being merged into Manly Facial Hair. Examples that don't fit or are zero-context are removed. To qualify for Manly Facial Hair, the facial hair must be associated with masculinity in some way. Please read the trope description before readding to make sure the example qualifies.
Deleted line(s) 18 (click to see context) :
* BadassBeard: [=McReady=], Van Wall the pilot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
small grammar fix
Changed line(s) 7,8 (click to see context) from:
Author Alec Nevalla-Lee rediscovered the original manuscript for ''Frozen Hell'', and it's was published following a successful Kickstarter campaign.
to:
Author Alec Nevalla-Lee rediscovered the original manuscript for ''Frozen Hell'', and it's it was published following a successful Kickstarter campaign.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 34 (click to see context) from:
* KilledOffScreen: The last time we see Clark, McNeily’s talking about how he’s the only one they know has to be human on account of him murdering Kinner. The only mention after that is them naming him in a list of people who turned out to be Things - presumably he was caught out by the blood test.
to:
* KilledOffScreen: The last time we see Clark, McNeily’s [=McNeily=]’s talking about how he’s the only one they know has to be human on account of him murdering Kinner. The only mention after that is them naming him in a list of people who turned out to be Things - presumably he was caught out by the blood test.
Changed line(s) 51 (click to see context) from:
* TooDumbToLive: Invoked. McNeily points out that if Connant-Thing hadn’t woken everyone up after being assimilated, the original Thing would have finished assimilating the dogs and nobody would have been any the wiser. Copper suggests that the Things simply don’t have any priorities beyond being perfect imitations, and since Connant would have raised the alarm that’s what Connant-Thing does too.
to:
* TooDumbToLive: Invoked. McNeily [=McNeily=] points out that if Connant-Thing hadn’t woken everyone up after being assimilated, the original Thing would have finished assimilating the dogs and nobody would have been any the wiser. Copper suggests that the Things simply don’t have any priorities beyond being perfect imitations, and since Connant would have raised the alarm that’s what Connant-Thing does too.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 14 (click to see context) :
* AnAxeToGrind: When they discover the alien, an axe has been embedded in its body from some past encounter with humanity prior to freezing.
Added DiffLines:
* AnAxeToGrind: When they discover the alien, an axe has been embedded in its body from some past encounter with humanity prior to freezing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* CopiedTheMoralsToo: The Thing acts *exactly* like whatever it’s imitating, right down to the victim’s feelings and morals. None of the Things ever attempt to sabotage the investigation, and Connant-Thing raises the alarm on the original’s escape for no other reason than that’s what the real Connant would have done.
Added DiffLines:
* KilledOffScreen: The last time we see Clark, McNeily’s talking about how he’s the only one they know has to be human on account of him murdering Kinner. The only mention after that is them naming him in a list of people who turned out to be Things - presumably he was caught out by the blood test.
Added DiffLines:
* LetsSplitUpGang: Notably averted, unlike in most of its adaptations. Once they figure out what they’re up against, the researchers move in groups no smaller than four and suffer no further casualties.
Added DiffLines:
* TooDumbToLive: Invoked. McNeily points out that if Connant-Thing hadn’t woken everyone up after being assimilated, the original Thing would have finished assimilating the dogs and nobody would have been any the wiser. Copper suggests that the Things simply don’t have any priorities beyond being perfect imitations, and since Connant would have raised the alarm that’s what Connant-Thing does too.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
better quality version
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
[[quoteright:324:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/who_goes_there_9.jpg]]
to:
%%
Added DiffLines:
Added DiffLines:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 42 (click to see context) from:
* PlantAliens: WordOfGod is the alien is closely related to carrots.
to:
* PlantAliens: WordOfGod is the alien is closely related to carrots.carrots, [[FridgeLogic which begs the question of how it's even an alien]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 52 (click to see context) from:
* WindowsOfTheSoul: When one character looks the alien's original form in the eye, he decides that its favorite passtime was "torturing the local equivalent of kittens."
to:
* WindowsOfTheSoul: When one character looks the alien's original form in the eye, he decides that its favorite passtime pastime was "torturing the local equivalent of kittens."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
They actually shot the first albatross they saw in the novel, so the ending is a lot more upbeat than that.
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
* AnAxeToGrind
to:
* AnAxeToGrindAnAxeToGrind: When they discover the alien, an axe has been embedded in its body from some past encounter with humanity prior to freezing.
* DownerEnding: Inverted. Whilst not as overtly optimistic as the 1951 film's ending, in which humanity are the explicit victors, the novel does end on a relatively upbeat note, with [[spoiler: our two protagonists surviving as unambiguously human and with every chance of getting out alive]]. The possibility that they might have failed after all is raised, but is shot down in-universe.
Changed line(s) 39 (click to see context) from:
* PanUpToTheSkyEnding: Combines with TheEndOrIsIt, as [[spoiler: The Blair-Thing is killed, but there is a possibility another Thing might have been in the body of an early albatross that the heroes saw flying north.]] However, the characters discuss this possibility and decide that it is very unlikely.
to:
* PanUpToTheSkyEnding: Combines with TheEndOrIsIt, as [[spoiler: The Blair-Thing is killed, but there is a possibility another Thing might have been in the body of escaped as an early albatross that the heroes saw flying north.albatross.]] However, the characters discuss this possibility and decide that it is very unlikely.unlikely [[spoiler: having shot the only albatross that they saw to prevent that]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 51 (click to see context) from:
* WindowsToTheSoul: When one character looks the alien's original form in the eye, he decides that its favorite passtime was "torturing the local equivalent of kittens."
to:
* WindowsToTheSoul: WindowsOfTheSoul: When one character looks the alien's original form in the eye, he decides that its favorite passtime was "torturing the local equivalent of kittens."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* WindowsToTheSoul: When one character looks the alien's original form in the eye, he decides that its favorite passtime was "torturing the local equivalent of kittens."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
''Who Goes There?'' is a {{science fiction}} novella written by Creator/JohnWCampbell. Originally a full-length novel titled ''Literature/FrozenHell'', it was shortened and renamed and published under the pen name Don A. Stuart in 1938 in the magazine ''Magazine/AstoundingStories''. It directly inspired the 1951 movie ''Film/TheThingFromAnotherWorld'' and the 1982 Creator/JohnCarpenter movie ''[[Film/TheThing1982 The Thing]]'' (and more loosely inspired 1972's ''Film/HorrorExpress''), and indirectly influenced the next few decades of science fiction by inspiring other authors to rip it off. ''Series/TheXFiles'', for instance, adapted it ''twice'', and ''Series/TheTerror'' is something of a Victorian-era homage.
to:
''Who Goes There?'' is a {{science fiction}} novella written by Creator/JohnWCampbell. Originally a full-length novel titled ''Literature/FrozenHell'', it was shortened and renamed and published under the pen name Don A. Stuart in 1938 in the magazine ''Magazine/AstoundingStories''. It directly inspired the 1951 movie ''Film/TheThingFromAnotherWorld'' and the 1982 Creator/JohnCarpenter movie ''[[Film/TheThing1982 The Thing]]'' (and more loosely inspired 1972's ''Film/HorrorExpress''), and indirectly influenced the next few decades of science fiction by inspiring other authors to rip it off. ''Series/TheXFiles'', for instance, adapted it ''twice'', and ''Series/TheTerror'' ''Literature/TheTerror'' is something of a Victorian-era homage.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
Author Alec Nevalla-Lee recently rediscovered the original manuscript for ''Frozen Hell'', and it's was published following a successful Kickstarter campaign.
to:
Author Alec Nevalla-Lee recently rediscovered the original manuscript for ''Frozen Hell'', and it's was published following a successful Kickstarter campaign.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
Author Alec Nevalla-Lee recently rediscovered the original manuscript for ''Frozen Hell'', and it's being published following a successful Kickstarter campaign.
to:
Author Alec Nevalla-Lee recently rediscovered the original manuscript for ''Frozen Hell'', and it's being was published following a successful Kickstarter campaign.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
* AdaptationalWimp: {{Inverted}}, as compared to the more well known version of the story (John Carpenter's Film/TheThing), the original version of the Thing was nowhere near as dangerous. This version was a blob monster that had to envelope and digest its prey to copy them and duplicate them. Large enough pieces could absorb living things but they were implied to be large enough that if you were attacked, you could most likely fight the pieces off. Carpenter's version was an AsteroidsMonster that could infect people like a virus and even a drop of blood could infect you, multiply, and slowly assimilate you. Also, this thing could only assume one form at a time whereas Carpenter's thing could take on composite forms based on the creatures previously absorbed and copied.
to:
* AdaptationalWimp: {{Inverted}}, as compared to the more well known version of the story (John Carpenter's Film/TheThing), (Creator/JohnCarpenter's ''[[Film/TheThing1982 The Thing]]''), the original version of the Thing was nowhere near as dangerous. This version was a blob monster that had to envelope and digest its prey to copy them and duplicate them. Large enough pieces could absorb living things but they were implied to be large enough that if you were attacked, you could most likely fight the pieces off. Carpenter's version was an AsteroidsMonster that could infect people like a virus and even a drop of blood could infect you, multiply, and slowly assimilate you. Also, this thing could only assume one form at a time whereas Carpenter's thing could take on composite forms based on the creatures previously absorbed and copied.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
* AdaptationalWimp: {{Inverted}}, as compared to the more well known version of the story (John Carpenter's Film/TheThing), the original version of the Thing was nowhere near as dangerous. This version was a blob monster that had to envelope and digest its prey to copy them and duplicate them. Large enough pieces could absorb living things but they were implied to be large enough that if you were attacked, you could most likely fight the pieces off. Carpenter's version was an AsteroidMonster that could infect people like a virus and even a drop of blood could infect you, multiply, and slowly assimilate you. Also, this thing could only assume one form at a time whereas Carpenter's thing could take on composite forms based on the creatures previously absorbed and copied.
to:
* AdaptationalWimp: {{Inverted}}, as compared to the more well known version of the story (John Carpenter's Film/TheThing), the original version of the Thing was nowhere near as dangerous. This version was a blob monster that had to envelope and digest its prey to copy them and duplicate them. Large enough pieces could absorb living things but they were implied to be large enough that if you were attacked, you could most likely fight the pieces off. Carpenter's version was an AsteroidMonster AsteroidsMonster that could infect people like a virus and even a drop of blood could infect you, multiply, and slowly assimilate you. Also, this thing could only assume one form at a time whereas Carpenter's thing could take on composite forms based on the creatures previously absorbed and copied.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
''Who Goes There?'' is a {{science fiction}} novella written by Creator/JohnWCampbell. It was published under the pen name Don A. Stuart in 1938 in the magazine ''Magazine/AstoundingStories''. It directly inspired the 1951 movie ''Film/TheThingFromAnotherWorld'' and the 1982 Creator/JohnCarpenter movie ''[[Film/TheThing1982 The Thing]]'' (and more loosely inspired 1972's ''Film/HorrorExpress''), and indirectly influenced the next few decades of science fiction by inspiring other authors to rip it off. ''Series/TheXFiles'', for instance, adapted it ''twice'', and ''Series/TheTerror'' is something of a Victorian-era homage.
to:
''Who Goes There?'' is a {{science fiction}} novella written by Creator/JohnWCampbell. It Originally a full-length novel titled ''Literature/FrozenHell'', it was shortened and renamed and published under the pen name Don A. Stuart in 1938 in the magazine ''Magazine/AstoundingStories''. It directly inspired the 1951 movie ''Film/TheThingFromAnotherWorld'' and the 1982 Creator/JohnCarpenter movie ''[[Film/TheThing1982 The Thing]]'' (and more loosely inspired 1972's ''Film/HorrorExpress''), and indirectly influenced the next few decades of science fiction by inspiring other authors to rip it off. ''Series/TheXFiles'', for instance, adapted it ''twice'', and ''Series/TheTerror'' is something of a Victorian-era homage.
Added DiffLines:
Author Alec Nevalla-Lee recently rediscovered the original manuscript for ''Frozen Hell'', and it's being published following a successful Kickstarter campaign.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* AdaptationalWimp: Compared to the more well known version of the story(John Carpenter's Film/TheThing) based on this one. This version of the Thing (the original version) was nowhere near as dangerous as Carpenter's later version. This version was a blob monster that had to envelope and digest its prey to copy them and duplicate them. Large enough pieces could absorb living things but they were implied to be large enough that if you were attacked, you could most likely fight the pieces off. Carpenter's version was an AsteroidMonster that could infect people like a virus and even a drop of blood could infect you, multiply, and slowly assimilate you. Also, this thing could only assume one form at a time whereas Carpenter's thing could take on composite forms based on the creatures previously absorbed and copied.
to:
* AdaptationalWimp: Compared {{Inverted}}, as compared to the more well known version of the story(John story (John Carpenter's Film/TheThing) based on this one. This Film/TheThing), the original version of the Thing (the original version) was nowhere near as dangerous as Carpenter's later version.dangerous. This version was a blob monster that had to envelope and digest its prey to copy them and duplicate them. Large enough pieces could absorb living things but they were implied to be large enough that if you were attacked, you could most likely fight the pieces off. Carpenter's version was an AsteroidMonster that could infect people like a virus and even a drop of blood could infect you, multiply, and slowly assimilate you. Also, this thing could only assume one form at a time whereas Carpenter's thing could take on composite forms based on the creatures previously absorbed and copied.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AdaptationalWimp: Compared to the more well known version of the story(John Carpenter's Film/TheThing) based on this one. This version of the Thing (the original version) was nowhere near as dangerous as Carpenter's later version. This version was a blob monster that had to envelope and digest its prey to copy them and duplicate them. Large enough pieces could absorb living things but they were implied to be large enough that if you were attacked, you could most likely fight the pieces off. Carpenter's version was an AsteroidMonster that could infect people like a virus and even a drop of blood could infect you, multiply, and slowly assimilate you. Also, this thing could only assume one form at a time whereas Carpenter's thing could take on composite forms based on the creatures previously absorbed and copied.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
We don't advertise other people's sites. It's assumed that our readers are smart enough to find a copy on their own.
Deleted line(s) 6,7 (click to see context) :
You can read the novella [[https://archive.org/details/WhoGoesThere_201710 here]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
It's explicitly said in the story that a Thing disguised as a human will continue acting like a human up to and including helping hunt other Things because each Thing's urge for self-preservation is stronger than its loyalty to the other Things. There's no indication that they ever forget who they really are.
Deleted line(s) 35,37 (click to see context) :
* LostInCharacter: The Things.
--> [[spoiler: Garry spoke in a low, bitter voice. "Connant was one of the finest men we had here—and five minutes ago I'd have sworn he was a man. Those damnable things are more than imitation." Garry shuddered and sat back in his bunk.]]
--> [[spoiler: And thirty seconds later, Garry's blood shrank from the hot platinum wire.]]
--> [[spoiler: Garry spoke in a low, bitter voice. "Connant was one of the finest men we had here—and five minutes ago I'd have sworn he was a man. Those damnable things are more than imitation." Garry shuddered and sat back in his bunk.]]
--> [[spoiler: And thirty seconds later, Garry's blood shrank from the hot platinum wire.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Link for new trope
Added DiffLines:
* BewareTheMindReader: The Thing has {{Telepathy}} and VoluntaryShapeshifter abilities. It uses them to copy both the minds and bodies of its victims before performing a KillAndReplace on them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* TheAssimilator: It's a little different (and slightly less nightmarish) than the movie version created by John Carpenter. While the thing can absorb people and create multiple copies, the creature is less like a virus and more of [[BlobMonster highly morphological plasticity]]. While pieces of its body will act independently of the main body, it seems unable to infect and devour people from within by using its blood or just a few cells. Instead this version of the thing seems to envelop and [[YouAreWhoYouEat digest organisms to copy them]] and grown more copies. Still horrific but less so than an enemy that can [[ParanoiaFuel attack you on a cellular level]]. The dogs are theorized to have bitten off pieces large enough that the pieces were still alive and could digest them from within.
to:
* TheAssimilator: It's a little different (and slightly less nightmarish) than the movie version created by John Carpenter. While the thing can absorb people and create multiple copies, the creature is less like a virus and more of [[BlobMonster highly morphological plasticity]]. While pieces of its body will act independently of the main body, it seems unable to infect and devour people from within by using its blood or just a few cells. Instead this version of the thing seems to envelop and [[YouAreWhoYouEat digest organisms to copy them]] and grown more copies. Still horrific but less so than an enemy that can [[ParanoiaFuel attack you on a cellular level]].level. The dogs are theorized to have bitten off pieces large enough that the pieces were still alive and could digest them from within.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
''Who Goes There?'' is a {{science fiction}} novella written by Creator/JohnWCampbell. It was published under the pen name Don A. Stuart in 1938 in the magazine ''Magazine/AstoundingStories''. It directly inspired the 1951 movie ''Film/TheThingFromAnotherWorld'' and the 1982 Creator/JohnCarpenter movie ''[[Film/TheThing1982 The Thing]]'' (and more loosely inspired 1972's ''Film/HorrorExpress''), and indirectly influenced the next few decades of science fiction by inspiring other authors to rip it off. ''Series/TheXFiles'', for instance, adapted it ''twice''.
to:
''Who Goes There?'' is a {{science fiction}} novella written by Creator/JohnWCampbell. It was published under the pen name Don A. Stuart in 1938 in the magazine ''Magazine/AstoundingStories''. It directly inspired the 1951 movie ''Film/TheThingFromAnotherWorld'' and the 1982 Creator/JohnCarpenter movie ''[[Film/TheThing1982 The Thing]]'' (and more loosely inspired 1972's ''Film/HorrorExpress''), and indirectly influenced the next few decades of science fiction by inspiring other authors to rip it off. ''Series/TheXFiles'', for instance, adapted it ''twice''.
''twice'', and ''Series/TheTerror'' is something of a Victorian-era homage.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
You can read the novella [[http://www.outpost31.com/books/who.txt here]].
to:
You can read the novella [[http://www.outpost31.com/books/who.txt [[https://archive.org/details/WhoGoesThere_201710 here]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[quoteright:324:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/who_goes_there_9.jpg]]