Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Literature / Middlemarch

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Casaubon assumes that Will is getting cozy with Dorothea so that, in the likely event Casaubon dies first and Dorothea inherits all his money, Will can then get rich from ComfortingTheWidow. (He's wrong; while Will ''is'' in love with Dorothea, he has no notion of ever doing more than crushing on her from a respectful distance for most of the book.)

to:

** Casaubon assumes that Will is getting cozy with Dorothea so that, in the likely event Casaubon dies first and Dorothea inherits all his money, Will can then get rich from ComfortingTheWidow. (He's wrong; while Will ''is'' in love with Dorothea, he has no notion of ever doing more than crushing on her from a respectful distance for most of the book.book, and when he finally gets one he resolves that he won't ask for her hand until he has at least as much money as she does.)



* IWantMyBelovedToBeHappy: [[spoiler: Farebrother]] doesn't try to come between Mary and Fred.

to:

* IWantMyBelovedToBeHappy: [[spoiler: Farebrother]] doesn't try to come between Mary and Fred. In fact, he not only refuses to come between them, but actively acts as a go-between so that Fred can be reassured of Mary's feelings for him.



* SelfFulfillingProphecy: The codicil to Casaubon's will.

to:

* SelfFulfillingProphecy: The codicil to Casaubon's will. Dorothea and Will enjoy each others' company, but have absolutely no intention of ever getting together, or even consciousness that they might ''want'' to, until Casaubon comes right out and posthumously forbids it.

Added: 1308

Changed: 578

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)


* DesperatelyLookingForAPurposeInLife: Dorothea Brooke's problem. The narrator suggests that SocietyIsToBlame, to a certain extent.

to:

* DesperatelyLookingForAPurposeInLife: Dorothea Brooke's problem. The narrator suggests that SocietyIsToBlame, to a certain extent.extent--if she were a man, she would be able to go into a profession and put all that passion to good use, but as a gentlewoman her options are far more restricted.



* GoldDigger: Rosamond Vincy is a subversion. What she originally expects to achieve through marriage is sophistication and an escape from provincial boredom rather than getting filthy rich. Her family are comfortably well-off (though by no means rich) and she repeatedly turns down suitors who are wealthier. It's flat-out poverty that crushes her spirit.

to:

* GoldDigger: GoldDigger:
**
Rosamond Vincy is a subversion. What she originally expects to achieve through marriage is sophistication and an escape from provincial boredom rather than getting filthy rich. Her family are comfortably well-off (though by no means rich) and she repeatedly turns down suitors who are wealthier. It's flat-out poverty that crushes her spirit.spirit.
** Casaubon assumes that Will is getting cozy with Dorothea so that, in the likely event Casaubon dies first and Dorothea inherits all his money, Will can then get rich from ComfortingTheWidow. (He's wrong; while Will ''is'' in love with Dorothea, he has no notion of ever doing more than crushing on her from a respectful distance for most of the book.)



* WhatDoesSheSeeInHim: Both of Dorothea's marriages come in for this.

to:

* WhatDoesSheSeeInHim: Both of Dorothea's marriages come in for this. Casaubon is much older than her, while Will is poorer and (gasp!) part Polish.
* WhatYouAreInTheDark: Featherstone offers Mary Garth a lot of money to burn one of his wills. Nobody would ever know, as it's the middle of the night and the two are alone, but Mary refuses to do so because she feels like it's shady and she worries he's not entirely in his right mind. Later she feels pretty bad about it, once she learns that the will Featherstone wanted her to burn is the one that disinherits Fred, but her father assures her that she did right in following her conscience. (Plus it turns out ''not'' inheriting the money was exactly the kick in the pants Fred needed to finally grow up.)

Added: 483

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheFundamentalist: Bulstrode.

to:

* %%* TheFundamentalist: Bulstrode.


Added DiffLines:

* LousyLoversAreLosers: Pompous scholar Edward Casaubon is heavily implied via euphemism to [[TheLoinsSleepTonight be impotent]] due to his sickly frailty, and unable to enjoy "family pleasures" with his [[MalMariee young wife Dorothea]]. He acts unapologetic about it, and treats her more or less as his assistant for his scholarly research, while at the same time not really respecting her intellect, making the marriage both sexually ''and'' emotionally unsatisfying for Dorothea.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* LoadsAndLoadsOfCharacters

Changed: 75

Removed: 755

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not really the place for an argument about Rosamond; suffice it to say she and her brother have trouble economizing.


* TheHedonist: Rosamond and Fred Vincy. Fred manages to redeem himself; Rosamond, not so much.
** The lack of options that women had is a theme in the novel. Fred redeems himself with the offer of a useful job giving him a modest income. Rosamond is plunged into debt through her husband's decisions and can do little about it, though she tries with her limited means.
** Actually, no. Rosamond plays an active role in getting the Lydgates into debt; she's the one who wants an expensive house, expensive furniture, and resists any of Tertius' attempts to recover, going behind his back multiple times. She definitely does not "try with her limited means", and while this is definitely due to her extremely limited upbringing, she is extraordinarily selfish and is an example of how some women really reinforce gender stereotypes and roles in society.

to:

* TheHedonist: Rosamond and Fred Vincy. Vincy, neither of whom are able to control their spending despite not being rich. Fred manages to redeem himself; Rosamond, not so much.
** The lack of options that women had is a theme in the novel. Fred redeems himself with the offer of a useful job giving him a modest income. Rosamond is plunged into debt through her husband's decisions and can do little about it, though she tries with her limited means.
** Actually, no. Rosamond plays an active role in getting the Lydgates into debt; she's the one who wants an expensive house, expensive furniture, and resists any of Tertius' attempts to recover, going behind his back multiple times. She definitely does not "try with her limited means", and while this is definitely due to her extremely limited upbringing, she is extraordinarily selfish and is an example of how some women really reinforce gender stereotypes and roles in society.
much.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Mary Garth is perfectly honourable and well-mannered, but she is quite plain, and a proper English Rose has to be pretty.

to:

** Mary Garth is perfectly honourable honourable, sensible and well-mannered, but she is quite plain, and a proper English Rose has to be pretty.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Rosamond was raised to be, and seen by most outsiders as, an archetypal English Rose: beautiful, gentle and virtuous, whereas inwardly she is shallow and selfish.
** Mary Garth is perfectly honourable and well-mannered, but she is quite plain, and proper English Rose has to be pretty.
** Dorothea is the one that comes closest to playing this trope straight, as she is at once beautiful, incredibly modest (in both senses of the word) and a seriously good person, but she is a bit too independent to be considered a completely decent lady in 19th century England.

to:

** Rosamond was raised to be, and seen by most outsiders as, an archetypal English Rose: beautiful, gentle and virtuous, whereas chaste, when inwardly she is shallow and selfish.
** Mary Garth is perfectly honourable and well-mannered, but she is quite plain, and a proper English Rose has to be pretty.
** Dorothea is the one that comes closest to playing this trope straight, as she is at once beautiful, incredibly modest (in both senses of the word) and a seriously good person, but she is she's a bit too independent to be considered a completely decent lady in 19th century England.

Added: 565

Changed: 1012

Removed: 73

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EnglishRose: All three main female characters are subversions. Rosamond was raised to be, and seen by most outsiders as, an archetypal English Rose: beautiful, gentle and virtuous, whereas inwardly she is shallow and selfish. Mary Garth is perfectly honourable and well-mannered, but she is quite plain. Dorothea is the one that comes closest to playing this trope straight, as she is at once beautiful, incredibly modest (in both senses of the word) and a seriously good person, but she is a bit too independent to be considered a completely decent lady in 19th century England.

to:

* EnglishRose: All three main female characters are subversions. subversions.
**
Rosamond was raised to be, and seen by most outsiders as, an archetypal English Rose: beautiful, gentle and virtuous, whereas inwardly she is shallow and selfish. selfish.
**
Mary Garth is perfectly honourable and well-mannered, but she is quite plain. plain, and proper English Rose has to be pretty.
**
Dorothea is the one that comes closest to playing this trope straight, as she is at once beautiful, incredibly modest (in both senses of the word) and a seriously good person, but she is a bit too independent to be considered a completely decent lady in 19th century England.



* MayDecemberRomance: Dorothea and Casaubon.
** A bad idea. It is heavily implied that the December party is impotent.

to:

* MayDecemberRomance: MalMariee: Dorothea marries the elderly Reverend Casaubon after falling in love with his scholarly works, only to realize that he's boring, jealous, and Casaubon.
** A bad idea. It is heavily
actively discouraging of intellectual pursuits for women. He's also implied to be impotent. Luckily for her, Casaubon dies shortly after she falls in mutual love with his kind, adventurous nephew Will. Unluckily, Casaubon was bitter enough to write in his will that the December party is impotent.Will and Dorothea would have to give up all of his inherited fortune if they ever married.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added image.

Added DiffLines:

[[quoteright:350:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/george_eliot_middlemarch.png]]

Added: 136

Changed: 477

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HeelFaceTurn: [[spoiler: Bulstrode]], after being shunned for [[spoiler: Raffles' death]], does try to put things right for Fred Vincy.

to:

** Actually, no. Rosamond plays an active role in getting the Lydgates into debt; she's the one who wants an expensive house, expensive furniture, and resists any of Tertius' attempts to recover, going behind his back multiple times. She definitely does not "try with her limited means", and while this is definitely due to her extremely limited upbringing, she is extraordinarily selfish and is an example of how some women really reinforce gender stereotypes and roles in society.
* HeelFaceTurn: [[spoiler: Bulstrode]], after being shunned for or [[spoiler: Raffles' death]], does try to put things right for Fred Vincy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GoldDigger: Rosamond Vincy is a subversion. What she originally wants is sophistication and an escape from provincial boredom. Her family are comfortably well-off but by no means rich and she repeatedly turns down suitors who are wealthier. It's flat-out poverty that crushes her spirit.

to:

* GoldDigger: Rosamond Vincy is a subversion. What she originally wants expects to achieve through marriage is sophistication and an escape from provincial boredom. boredom rather than getting filthy rich. Her family are comfortably well-off but (though by no means rich rich) and she repeatedly turns down suitors who are wealthier. It's flat-out poverty that crushes her spirit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EnglishRose: All three main female characters are subversions. Rosamond was raised to be, and seen by most outsiders as, an archetypal English Rose: beautiful, gentle and virtuous, whereas inwardly she is shallow and selfish. Mary Garth is perfectly honourable and well-mannered, but she is quite plain. Dorothea is the one that comes closest to playing this trope straight, as she is at once beautiful, incredibly modest and a seriously good person, but she is a bit too independent to be considered a completely decent lady in 19th century England.

to:

* EnglishRose: All three main female characters are subversions. Rosamond was raised to be, and seen by most outsiders as, an archetypal English Rose: beautiful, gentle and virtuous, whereas inwardly she is shallow and selfish. Mary Garth is perfectly honourable and well-mannered, but she is quite plain. Dorothea is the one that comes closest to playing this trope straight, as she is at once beautiful, incredibly modest (in both senses of the word) and a seriously good person, but she is a bit too independent to be considered a completely decent lady in 19th century England.

Changed: 246

Removed: 240

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GoldDigger: Rosamond Vincy. She's badly disappointed.
** Not exactly. She wants sophistication and an escape from provincial boredom. Her family are comfortably well-off but by no means rich and she repeatedly turns down suitors who are wealthier. It's flat-out poverty that crushes her spirit.

to:

* GoldDigger: Rosamond Vincy. She's badly disappointed.
** Not exactly. She
Vincy is a subversion. What she originally wants is sophistication and an escape from provincial boredom. Her family are comfortably well-off but by no means rich and she repeatedly turns down suitors who are wealthier. It's flat-out poverty that crushes her spirit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Two television adaptations have been made, in 1968 and in 1994, and a film by Sam Mendes is in production.

to:

Two television adaptations have been made, in 1968 and in 1994, and a 1994. No film by has yet been made, although Sam Mendes is in production.was once reported to have been producing one.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EnglishRose: All three main female characters are subversions. Rosamond was raised to be, and seen by most outsiders as, an archetypal English Rose: beautiful, gentle and virtuous, but inwardly she is shallow and selfish. Mary Garth is perfectly honourable and well-mannered, but she is quite plain. Dorothea is the one that comes closest to playing this trope straight, as she is at once beautiful, incredibly modest and a seriously good person, but she is a bit too independent to be considered a completely decent lady in 19th century England.

to:

* EnglishRose: All three main female characters are subversions. Rosamond was raised to be, and seen by most outsiders as, an archetypal English Rose: beautiful, gentle and virtuous, but whereas inwardly she is shallow and selfish. Mary Garth is perfectly honourable and well-mannered, but she is quite plain. Dorothea is the one that comes closest to playing this trope straight, as she is at once beautiful, incredibly modest and a seriously good person, but she is a bit too independent to be considered a completely decent lady in 19th century England.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EnglishRose: All three main female characters are subversions. Rosamond was raised to be, and seen by most outsiders as, an archetypal EnglishRose, beautiful, gentle and virtuous; but inwardly she is shallow and selfish. Mary Garth is perfectly honourable and well-mannered, but she is quite plain. Dorothea is the one that comes closest to playing this trope straight, as she is at once beautiful, incredibly modest and a seriously good person, but she is a bit too independent to be considered a completely decent lady in 19th century England.

to:

* EnglishRose: All three main female characters are subversions. Rosamond was raised to be, and seen by most outsiders as, an archetypal EnglishRose, English Rose: beautiful, gentle and virtuous; virtuous, but inwardly she is shallow and selfish. Mary Garth is perfectly honourable and well-mannered, but she is quite plain. Dorothea is the one that comes closest to playing this trope straight, as she is at once beautiful, incredibly modest and a seriously good person, but she is a bit too independent to be considered a completely decent lady in 19th century England.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EnglishRose: All three main female characters are subversions. Rosamond was raised to be, and seen by most outsiders as, an archetypal EnglishRose, beautiful, gentle and virtuous; but inwardly she is shallow and selfish. Mary Garth is perfectly honourable and well-mannered, but she is quite plain. Dorothea is the one that comes closest to playing this trope straight, as she is at once beautiful, incredibly modest and a seriously good person, but she is a bit too "fervent" in her beliefs and ideals, and a bit too interested in "manly affairs" (such as managing her land, or science and learning) to be considered a completely decent lady in 19th century England.

to:

* EnglishRose: All three main female characters are subversions. Rosamond was raised to be, and seen by most outsiders as, an archetypal EnglishRose, beautiful, gentle and virtuous; but inwardly she is shallow and selfish. Mary Garth is perfectly honourable and well-mannered, but she is quite plain. Dorothea is the one that comes closest to playing this trope straight, as she is at once beautiful, incredibly modest and a seriously good person, but she is a bit too "fervent" in her beliefs and ideals, and a bit too interested in "manly affairs" (such as managing her land, or science and learning) independent to be considered a completely decent lady in 19th century England.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EnglishRose: All three main female characters are subversions. Rosamond was raised to be, and seen by most outsiders as, an archetypal EnglishRose, beautiful, gentle and virtuous, but inwardly she is shallow and selfish. Mary Garth is perfectly honourable and well-mannered, but she is quite plain. Dorothea is the one that comes closest to playing this trope straight, as she is at once beautiful, incredibly modest and a seriously good person, but she is a bit too "fervent" in her beliefs and ideals, and a bit too interested in "manly affairs" (such as managing her land, or science and learning) to be considered a completely decent lady in 19th century England.

to:

* EnglishRose: All three main female characters are subversions. Rosamond was raised to be, and seen by most outsiders as, an archetypal EnglishRose, beautiful, gentle and virtuous, virtuous; but inwardly she is shallow and selfish. Mary Garth is perfectly honourable and well-mannered, but she is quite plain. Dorothea is the one that comes closest to playing this trope straight, as she is at once beautiful, incredibly modest and a seriously good person, but she is a bit too "fervent" in her beliefs and ideals, and a bit too interested in "manly affairs" (such as managing her land, or science and learning) to be considered a completely decent lady in 19th century England.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* EnglishRose: All three main female characters are subversions. Rosamond was raised to be, and seen by most outsiders as, an archetypal EnglishRose, beautiful, gentle and virtuous, but inwardly she is shallow and selfish. Mary Garth is perfectly honourable and well-mannered, but she is quite plain. Dorothea is the one that comes closest to playing this trope straight, as she is at once beautiful, incredibly modest and a seriously good person, but she is a bit too "fervent" in her beliefs and ideals, and a bit too interested in "manly affairs" (such as managing her land, or science and learning) to be considered a completely decent lady in 19th century England.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Crosswicking example from newly launched trope

Added DiffLines:

* ExtremelyLengthyCreation: InUniverse. Rev. Casaubon's life's work, an unfinished book ''The Key to All Mythologies'', is intended as a monument to the tradition of Christian syncretism. [[spoiler:It turns out his life's work is useless as he is behind on current studies (he doesn't read German, so his scholarship is incomplete). He is aware of this, but has put too much time into his research to admit it.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Subverted in Mary Garth's case as well: she makes it very clear to Fred Vincy that he has no chance with her if he continues reckless and idle.

to:

** Subverted in Mary Garth's case as well: she makes it very clear to Fred Vincy that he has no chance with her if he continues reckless to live recklessly and idle.

Changed: 41

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
If you want to share your opinion on a work, write a review


* {{Doorstopper}}: It's 800 pages and the most exciting things that happens are the deaths of two characters, a provincial doctor's threatened disgrace and the coming of age of a idealistic young woman. That said, this troper thinks it's great.

to:

* {{Doorstopper}}: It's 800 pages and the most exciting things that happens are the deaths of two characters, a provincial doctor's threatened disgrace and the coming of age of a idealistic young woman. That said, this troper thinks it's great.

Added: 86

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BreakTheHaughty: Bulstrode and Lydgate, in particular.

to:

* BreakTheHaughty: Bulstrode and Lydgate, in particular. particular.
* CatchPhrase: Mr. Brooke's "You know, that kind of thing." or some variation thereof.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AmbiguouslyJewish: Will Ladislaw, considering his appearance, his Polish heritage, and similarities with the Jewish protagonist of Eliot's later novel ''Literature/DanielDeronda''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GreedyJew: Possibly. Mr Dunkirk, the crooked dealer and Will's grandfather, is referred to as a "thieving Jew pawnbroker", though it's unclear whether the word "Jew" is merely [[ValuesDissonance being used as an epithet]] in this context.

to:

* GreedyJew: Possibly. Mr Dunkirk, the crooked dealer and Will's grandfather, is referred to more than once as a "thieving Jew "Jew pawnbroker", though it's unclear whether the word "Jew" is merely [[ValuesDissonance being used as an epithet]] in this context.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* GreedyJew: Possibly. Mr Dunkirk, the crooked dealer and Will's grandfather, is referred to as a "thieving Jew pawnbroker", though it's unclear whether the word "Jew" is merely [[ValuesDissonance being used as an epithet]] in this context.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* MalignedMixedMarriage: Will's English mother was disowned by her family for marrying a Pole, and he and [[spoiler: Dorothea]] get a touch of the same treatment when they decide to marry, though there are other reasons.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FriendToAllChildren: Will Ladislaw, who is followed by a troop of children during his election campaigning.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

->''Who shall tell what may be the effect of writing? If it happens to be cut in stone, though it lie face downmost for ages on a forsaken beach, or 'rest quietly under the drums and tramplings of many conquests', it may end by letting us into the secret of usurpations and other scandals gossiped about long centuries ago: -- this world being apparently a huge whispering-gallery.''

''Middlemarch'' : A Study of Provincial Life is a novel by Creator/GeorgeEliot, first published in instalments from 1871 to 1872 and often considered to be her masterpiece.

The novel centres around several groups of characters in the provincial town of Middlemarch and its surrounding villages, between the years 1829 and 1832. This was a time of political change in England, during which Parliamentary reform was proposed to increase the number of eligible voters and to remove "rotten boroughs" - constituencies in which a Member of Parliament could be returned by only one or two voters. The differing political and religious views of some characters form part of the background of the novel. Mr. Brooke, for example, stands for reforms that are unpopular with other members of the town's gentry.

Against this background, three main plot strands concern three different couples or relationships.

Dorothea Brooke, an intelligent, idealistic young woman marries Mr. Casaubon, a much older man whose life's work on a Key to all Mythologies she thinks will provide a fulfilling role for her. She looks forward to helping Casaubon in his great project, and imagines that it will open a new understanding of culture, art, language and life. Meanwhile, Will Ladislaw, Casaubon's orphaned cousin from a disgraced branch of the family, is searching for direction and a way to gain a useful living away from Casaubon's patronage.

Fred Vincy is the son of a successful Middlemarch manufacturer. His prospects in life are bright, but rely on an expected inheritance from Mr. Featherstone, a rich uncle by marriage. While waiting for this, he's happy to live on his expectations and try to maintain the life of an educated gentleman-at-leisure, while dreaming of a future with his childhood sweetheart, Mary Garth.

Rosamond Vincy is Fred's sister, who finds herself attracted to the good prospects and glamorous background of Lydgate, the town's new doctor. Lydgate himself has thoroughly modern ideas and looks forward to replacing the town's old-fashioned medical practices, while carrying out research at the new fever hospital to which he is appointed.

Other characters include the wealthy and seemingly respectable banker, Bulstrode, who sponsors Lydgate and deals with the financial affairs of the Vincys, and Mr. Farebrother, a clergyman who is in the running for the chaplaincy at the new hospital.

Over the course of the novel, Eliot deals with the way in which these various plans and dreams play out, and how circumstance, and the expectations and scruples of an often small-minded society can interfere with happiness and change.

Eliot also seems to have been quite conscious of the tropes she was playing with; her essay "Silly Novels by Lady Novelists" sets out many of the 19th century literary tropes subverted in the Dorothea story arc. In brief, Eliot didn't think much of novels written by women in which the protagonist, generally both a MarySue and ThePollyanna , would go around bettering the lives of the wretched, showing how smart she was and then making a good marriage. This should sound familiar to readers of the novel.

Two television adaptations have been made, in 1968 and in 1994, and a film by Sam Mendes is in production.
----

!!This book provides examples of:

* TheAlcoholic: Raffles. It ultimately leads to [[spoiler: his not-exactly accidental death.]]
* AllGirlsWantBadBoys: Spectacularly subverted in Dorothea's case. Casaubon's age and demeanor make him more attractive to her, not less.
** Subverted in Mary Garth's case as well: she makes it very clear to Fred Vincy that he has no chance with her if he continues reckless and idle.
* AssholeVictim: [[spoiler: Raffles.]]
* AuthorAvatar: Two candidates, neither exact:
** Dorothea is religious and bookish, much like Eliot was in her youth.
** Mary Garth is plain, but attractive for other qualities, much like Eliot was reputed to be.
* BeautyEqualsGoodness: Questioned, as per the usual in Eliot's fiction.
* {{Blackmail}}: Why Raffles decides that now would be a really good time to pay Bulstrode a visit.
* BreakTheHaughty: Bulstrode and Lydgate, in particular.
* ChildhoodMarriagePromise: Fred Vincy and Mary Garth.
* ClearMyName: Dorothea rallies her friends to Lydgate's side once he is [[spoiler: wrongly implicated in Raffles' death.]]
* ContrivedCoincidence: A less extreme example than some, and somewhat disguised, but the way that Raffles finds Bulstrode, and the fact that Bulstrode turns out to be [[spoiler: Ladislaw's step-grandfather]], both seem to be large coincidences. Par for the course in a Victorian novel, though.
* DecidedByOneVote: Lydgate has the deciding vote on the chaplaincy of the new hospital.
* DeathOfTheHypotenuse: Casaubon tries desperately to avert this, and with a ThanatosGambit seeks to ensure that even in the event of his death the survivors could never marry.
* DesperatelyLookingForAPurposeInLife: Dorothea Brooke's problem. The narrator suggests that SocietyIsToBlame, to a certain extent.
* {{Doorstopper}}: It's 800 pages and the most exciting things that happens are the deaths of two characters, a provincial doctor's threatened disgrace and the coming of age of a idealistic young woman. That said, this troper thinks it's great.
** Probably the Britlit equivalent to War and Peace -- the Guardian once held is up as an example of that great novel that you really should have read, but never did.
* TheFundamentalist: Bulstrode.
* TheGamblingAddict: Mr. Farebrother supplements his meagre income by betting on whist, which is somewhat scandalous for a clergyman. He has no problem giving up when he's given a better-paid post, though. Fred Vincy also flirts with the idea, when looking forward to life as a landed gentleman.
* GoldDigger: Rosamond Vincy. She's badly disappointed.
** Not exactly. She wants sophistication and an escape from provincial boredom. Her family are comfortably well-off but by no means rich and she repeatedly turns down suitors who are wealthier. It's flat-out poverty that crushes her spirit.
* TheHedonist: Rosamond and Fred Vincy. Fred manages to redeem himself; Rosamond, not so much.
** The lack of options that women had is a theme in the novel. Fred redeems himself with the offer of a useful job giving him a modest income. Rosamond is plunged into debt through her husband's decisions and can do little about it, though she tries with her limited means.
* HeelFaceTurn: [[spoiler: Bulstrode]], after being shunned for [[spoiler: Raffles' death]], does try to put things right for Fred Vincy.
* HopelessSuitor: [[spoiler: Farebrother]] is in love with Mary Garth.
* ICouldaBeenAContender: Tertius Lydgate and Edward Casaubon, quite explicitly, but Dorothea Brooke as well.
* IWantMyBelovedToBeHappy: [[spoiler: Farebrother]] doesn't try to come between Mary and Fred.
* LoadsAndLoadsOfCharacters
* LoveTriangle or LoveDodecahedron: There are several love triangles, some of which intersect. Will, Casaubon and Dorothea, then Lydgate, Rosamond and Will, then Farebrother, Fred and Mary. Sir James also had a thing for Dorothea before marrying her sister instead.
* LukeIAmYourFather: Or, rather, [[spoiler: Bulstrode]] turns out to be [[spoiler: Will's step-grandfather.]]
* MayDecemberRomance: Dorothea and Casaubon.
** A bad idea. It is heavily implied that the December party is impotent.
* MeaningfulName: Farebrother, Rosamond, Casaubon, Raffles.
* NamesToRunAwayFromReallyFast: Raffles (another link to the gambling theme).
* NamesToTrustImmediately: Mr. Farebrother.
* NeverLendToAFriend: Fred gets the somewhat financially naive Mr. Garth to underwrite his debts, which causes the Garths to lose their life's savings.
* NoCelebritiesWereHarmed: ...Possibly. Casaubon may have been modeled on one of Eliot's acquaintances, the Oxford scholar Mark Pattison, then engaged on a biography of Isaac Casaubon. Pattison was [[MayDecemberRomance over twenty years older than his wife]].
* ParentalSubstitute: Mr. Brooke for Dorothea and Celia.
* PassedOverInheritance: Peter Featherstone's will disappoints his entire family, especially Fred.
* ScrewTheMoneyIHaveRules: See SelfFulfillingProphecy.
* SelfFulfillingProphecy: The codicil to Casaubon's will.
* TwoLinesNoWaiting: There are at least four major intersecting plotlines.
* UglyGuyHotWife: Casaubon and Dorothea.
* UptownGirl: Dorothea's fortune and Will's poverty and foreign background is one of the obstacles between them.
* WhatDoesSheSeeInHim: Both of Dorothea's marriages come in for this.
* WhereAreTheyNowEpilogue: The Finale.
----

Top