Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Literature / Demons

Go To

OR

Added: 183

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* NoCelebritiesWereHarmed: Karmazinov is widely seen as a caricature on fellow writer, Creator/IvanTurgenev. (Though somewhat confusingly, it is indicated at least once that the ''actual'' Turgenev exists in the novel's universe as well.) Various other characters are at least partially based on real-life figures as well. Verkhovensky was inspired by the revolutionary Sergei Nechaev, Stavrogin is based on an acquaintance of Dostoevsky's named Nikolai Speshnev, Stepan Trofimovich is a CompositeCharacter based on several liberal intellectuals, etc.

to:

* NoCelebritiesWereHarmed: Karmazinov is widely seen as a caricature on fellow writer, Creator/IvanTurgenev. (Though somewhat confusingly, it is indicated at least once that the ''actual'' Turgenev exists in the novel's universe as well.) Various other characters are at least partially based on real-life figures as well. Verkhovensky was inspired by the revolutionary Sergei Nechaev, Nechayev, Stavrogin is based on an acquaintance of Dostoevsky's named Nikolai Speshnev, Stepan Trofimovich is a CompositeCharacter based on several liberal intellectuals, etc.


Added DiffLines:

** Subverted in the case of Stepan Trofimovich, who believes the authorities have been tabs on him for years when in reality no one takes him seriously enough to be threatened by him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Uncanny Valley is IUEO now and the subjective version has been split; cleaning up misuse and ZCE in the process


-->''"I was also struck by his face: his hair was somehow too black, his light eyes were somehow too calm and clear, his complexion was somehow too delicate and white, his color somehow too bright and clean, his teeth like pearls, his lips like coral--the very image of beauty, it would seem, and at the same time repulsive, as it were. [[UncannyValley People said his face resembled a mask...]]"''

to:

-->''"I was also struck by his face: his hair was somehow too black, his light eyes were somehow too calm and clear, his complexion was somehow too delicate and white, his color somehow too bright and clean, his teeth like pearls, his lips like coral--the very image of beauty, it would seem, and at the same time repulsive, as it were. [[UncannyValley People said his face resembled a mask...]]"''"''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheSociopath: Stepan Verkhovensky definitely qualifies. Stavrogin probably does too, though he at least recognizes it in himself and on some level wishes he was different.

to:

* TheSociopath: Stepan Pyotr Verkhovensky definitely qualifies. Stavrogin probably does too, though he at least recognizes it in himself and on some level wishes he was different.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
IUEO now


* AwesomeMcCoolName: Pyotr Verkhovensky, whose family name is formed from "verkhovenstvo", which means "supremacy" in Russian.

Changed: 56

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DirtyCommies: A pre-Soviet/Cold War example and probably a TropeCodifier. Dostoevsky's characters hit just about every negative stereotype which would come to be associated with the radical left in the next century.

to:

* DirtyCommies: A pre-Soviet/Cold War pre-[[UsefulNotes/SovietRussiaUkraineAndSoOn Soviet]]/UsefulNotes/ColdWar example and probably a TropeCodifier. Dostoevsky's characters hit just about every negative stereotype which would come to be associated with the radical left in the next century.

Changed: 10

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheInformant: The radicals live in constant fear of informants and spies, whether from the tsarist government or their own ranks. [[spoiler: Shatov is eventually murdered on the false pretense that he is one of these.]]

to:

* TheInformant: TheInformant / TheMole: The radicals live in constant fear of informants and spies, whether from the tsarist government or their own ranks. [[spoiler: Shatov is eventually murdered on the false pretense that he is one of these.]]

Changed: 32

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* KarmaHoudini: Petr Stepanovic, SmugSnake and ManipulativeBastard, causes the death and/or the ruin of the great majority of the other characters, both the positive and the negative ones, either directly or indirectly; by the end of the book, he is the only one who gets away from the massacre unscathed, happy and successful.

to:

* KarmaHoudini: Petr Stepanovic, Pyotr Verkhovensky, SmugSnake and ManipulativeBastard, causes [[spoiler: the death and/or the ruin of the great majority of the other characters, both the positive and the negative ones, either directly or indirectly; by the end of the book, he is the only one who gets away from the massacre unscathed, happy and successful.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DirtyCommies: A pre-Soviet/Cold War example and probably a TropeCodifier. Dostoevsky's characters hit just about every negative stereotype which would come to be associated with the radical left in the next century.


Added DiffLines:

* TheInformant: The radicals live in constant fear of informants and spies, whether from the tsarist government or their own ranks. [[spoiler: Shatov is eventually murdered on the false pretense that he is one of these.]]

Added: 1024

Changed: 69

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FirstPersonPeripheralNarrator: Anton Lavrentyevich.

to:

* FirstPersonPeripheralNarrator: Anton Lavrentyevich.Lavrentyevich witnesses plenty of the action but participates in very little of it.
* FullCircleRevolution: The novel makes it clear that if the radicals ever gain power, the results will be at least as bad as (and probably much worse than) the political and social system they're trying to replace.


Added DiffLines:

* MeetTheNewBoss: At least the more cynical members of the radical group have no intention of actually improving the world for anyone other than themselves. Shigalyov explicitly proposes a system which would leave 90% of the population enslaved by the remaining 10%.


Added DiffLines:

* TheRevolutionWillNotBeVilified: Strongly averted. The whole novel is essentially an exercise in vilifying the revolution, as Dostoevsky was the first to admit.
* RiddleForTheAges: It's never revealed whether the cells of radical agitators which Verkhovensky claims to have established all over Russia actually exist, or if the "fivesome" of the novel is the only one. Liputin comes to believe that the other groups are a lie, the narrator speculates that they might actually be real, and Verkhovensky never gives a straight answer either way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Ill Girl has been cut per TRS decision. Examples are moved to Delicate And Sickly when appropriate.


* IllGirl: Marya Lebyadkina, the demented and physically handicapped young wife of Stavrogin.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

-->''"I was also struck by his face: his hair was somehow too black, his light eyes were somehow too calm and clear, his complexion was somehow too delicate and white, his color somehow too bright and clean, his teeth like pearls, his lips like coral--the very image of beauty, it would seem, and at the same time repulsive, as it were. [[UncannyValley People said his face resembled a mask...]]"''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* NiceGuy: Few and far between, but not totally nonexistent.
** Poor Mavriky is just about the only character who genuinely seems to want to do right by everyone else, especially his fiancée Liza. He suffers for it.
** The narrator seems like a pretty decent guy too, and is especially devoted to Stepan Trofimovich, even if he can be a bit cranky.

Removed: 252

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Misuse of this trope


* DoggedNiceGuy:
** Poor Mavriky is just about the only character who genuinely seems to want to do right by everyone else. He suffers for it.
** The narrator seems like a pretty decent guy too (and is definitely dogged), even if he can be a bit cranky.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DoubleMeaningTitle: There has been quite a bit of critical discussion about whether the "demons" of the title are meant to be the radicals themselves, or simply the ideas which have consumed them. (The text itself seems to support the second reading; towards the end Stepan Trofimovich hears a Bible passage about demons being cast out of a man and into a herd of pigs, and remarks that he and the other characters are like the pigs.) It doesn't help that for most of the 20th century the book was alternately translated into English as either ''The Devils'' or ''The Possessed''--the whole emphasis of the title was completely reversed depending on which version you happened to pick up.

Changed: 26

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheRevolutionWillNotBeCivilized: The novel argues that violence is a tool of binding revolutionaries together in a single unit, since everyone is equally dehumanized and guilty, and moulded on the path to discipline. The revolutionaries in the book are so obsessed with this form of discipline that they never think of actual political ideology. So they become corrupt and abusive, led by Pyotr Verkhovensky, their ideologist who preaches about the necessity of wiping out millions of people for the victory of the revolution and finally kills one of his own cell members at the suspicion that he could be TheMole. Likewise, the original ideologist of the group, Nikolai Stavrogin who they all believe to be a ByronicHero is in fact a self-destructive nihilist reeling from guilt at the time he raped a little girl. What is even worse, the leader of this group has a prototype from real life -- Sergey Nechaev, one of the most infamous Russian terrorists of that time.

to:

* TheRevolutionWillNotBeCivilized: The novel argues that violence is a tool of binding revolutionaries together in a single unit, since everyone is equally dehumanized and guilty, and moulded on the path to discipline. The revolutionaries in the book are so obsessed with this form of discipline that they never think of actual political ideology. So they become corrupt and abusive, led by Pyotr Verkhovensky, their ideologist who preaches about the necessity of wiping out millions of people for the victory of the revolution and finally [[spoiler: kills one of his own cell members members]] at the suspicion that he could be TheMole. Likewise, the original ideologist of the group, Nikolai Stavrogin who they all believe to be a ByronicHero is in fact a self-destructive nihilist reeling from guilt at the time he [[spoiler: raped a little girl.girl]]. What is even worse, the leader of this group has a prototype from real life -- Sergey Nechaev, one of the most infamous Russian terrorists of that time.

Changed: 26

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AccompliceByInaction: "Fedka the convict" bugs Nikolai Stavrogin for some money, and Stavrogin eventually complies. Afterwards, Stavrogin realizes why Fedka was asking for the money--in a very indirect way, Fedka was offering to kill Stavrogin's wife and brother-in-law in exchange for cash. Realizing this, Stavrogin leaps into action and... does nothing, until his wife and brother-in-law die at Fedka's hand. He outright says, the morning after, that even if he isn't legally guilty of the murders, he considers himself morally guilty.

to:

* AccompliceByInaction: "Fedka the convict" bugs Nikolai Stavrogin for some money, and Stavrogin eventually complies. Afterwards, Stavrogin realizes why Fedka was asking for the money--in a very indirect way, Fedka was offering to [[spoiler: kill Stavrogin's wife and brother-in-law brother-in-law]] in exchange for cash. Realizing this, Stavrogin leaps into action and... does nothing, until [[spoiler: his wife and brother-in-law die at Fedka's hand.hand]]. He outright says, the morning after, that even if he isn't legally guilty of the murders, he considers himself morally guilty.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* OneSteveLimit: {{Averted}} with Marya Timofeevna and Marya Ignateevna. Both have significant relationships with Shatov, too.


Added DiffLines:

* PurpleProse: InUniverse, everything Stepan Trofimovich writes (and most of what he speaks) qualifies, much to the annoyance of the other characters. Karmazinov is somehow even worse.


Added DiffLines:

* TakeThat: The whole character of Karmazinov is one of these directed at Dostoevsky's fellow author Ivan Turgenev, and the pompous farewell address he reads during the fête is a {{Parody}} of some of Turgenev's real writings.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Doorstopper}}: Like most of Dostoevsky's novel. This one comes in at around 700 pages in most editions.

to:

* {{Doorstopper}}: Like most of Dostoevsky's novel.novels. This one comes in at around 700 pages in most editions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* {{Doorstopper}}: Like most of Dostoevsky's novel. This one comes in at around 700 pages in most editions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AsTheGoodBookSays: Two passages from Literature/TheBible--[[Literature/TheFourGospels Luke]] 8:32-36, about Jesus exorcising a man of his demons and sending them into a herd of pigs, and [[Literature/TheBookOfRevelation Revelation]] 3:14-18, about how being morally "lukewarm" is worse than being hot or cold--come up at various points in the book.

Changed: 28

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MoodWhiplash: The [[spoiler: murder of Shatov and death of Marya Ignateevna and her newborn child]] immediately after they couple is reunited and have started planning their future together.

to:

* MoodWhiplash: The [[spoiler: murder of Shatov and death of Marya Ignateevna and her newborn child]] occur immediately after they the couple is have reunited and have started begun planning their future together.

Changed: 21

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CharacterFilibuster: This being a Dostoevsky novel, many characters discourse on their respective political, religious, and artistic views. There's even a minor character named "Filibusterov"!
* CharityBall: Yulia Mikhailovna throws one as a pretense to show off her social and cultural connections. It goes disastrously, thanks in part to it's being deliberately sabotaged by the radicals.

to:

* CharacterFilibuster: This being a Dostoevsky novel, many characters discourse on their respective political, religious, and artistic views. There's even a minor character named "Filibusterov"!
"[[UnfortunateName Filibusterov]]"!
* CharityBall: Yulia Mikhailovna throws one as a pretense to show off her social and cultural connections. It goes disastrously, thanks in part to it's its being deliberately sabotaged by the radicals.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CharityBall: Yulia Mikhailovna throws one as a pretense to show off her social and cultural connections. It goes disastrously, thanks in part to it's being deliberately sabotaged by the radicals.

Added: 5186

Changed: 1694

Removed: 252

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Set in a small provincial town, the ''Demons'' concerns a group of revolutionaries led by Pyotr Verkhovensky who plan to usher a revolution of some sort but explode as a series of personal connections between them weakens discipline, driving Verkhoevensky to seek aid from Nikolai Stavrogin, a dissolute liberal nobleman and purported ProdigalHero who he sees as the charismatic leader who could bind the cause and heal disputes. However, Stavrogin is himself highly schismatic and divided, reeling from secret trauma and is reluctant to take the role Verkhoevensky tasks for him.

to:

Set in a small provincial town, the ''Demons'' concerns a group of revolutionaries led by Pyotr Verkhovensky who plan to usher a revolution of some sort but explode as a series of personal connections between them weakens discipline, driving Verkhoevensky Verkhovensky to seek aid from Nikolai Stavrogin, a dissolute liberal nobleman and purported ProdigalHero who he sees as the charismatic leader who could bind the cause and heal disputes. However, Stavrogin is himself highly schismatic and divided, reeling from secret trauma and is reluctant to take the role Verkhoevensky Verkhovensky tasks for him.



* AnyoneCanDie: [[spoiler: About half the main cast has been wiped out by the end of the book, most of them in the last few chapters. Lebyadkin and Marya Timofeevna are murdered by Fedka, Fedka himself is killed mysteriously outside of town, Lizaveta is beaten to death by a mob who blame her for the Lebyadkins' deaths, Shatov is murdered by the fivesome, Kirillov shoots himself and takes the fall for Shatov's murder, Stepan Trofimovich dies of an illness after striking out on his own, Marya Ignateevna and her newborn child die after after hunting for Shatov in the cold, and Stavrogin hangs himself.]] It's [[{{Understatement}} a bit]] [[DownerEnding of a downer.]]
* AuthorTract: In Dostoevsky's own words, the book was originally conceived as a "novel-tract" about what he perceived as a growing ideological problem in Russia.

to:

* AllLoveIsUnrequited: Though it plays out in different ways depending on the situation, just about ''every'' romantic pairing in the book has this dynamic to some degree.
* AnyoneCanDie: [[spoiler: About half the main cast has been wiped out by the end of the book, most of them in the last few chapters. Lebyadkin and Marya Timofeevna are murdered by Fedka, Fedka himself is killed mysteriously outside of town, Lizaveta is beaten to death by a mob who blame her for the Lebyadkins' deaths, Shatov is murdered by the fivesome, Kirillov shoots himself and takes the fall for Shatov's murder, Stepan Trofimovich dies of an illness after striking out on his own, Marya Ignateevna and her newborn child die after after hunting for Shatov in the cold, and Stavrogin hangs himself.]] It's [[{{Understatement}} a bit]] [[DownerEnding of a downer.]]
* AuthorTract: In Dostoevsky's own words, the book was originally conceived as a "novel-tract" "novel-pamphlet" about what he perceived as a growing ideological problem in Russia.



* TheConfidant: Darya Shatova acts as one for Nikolai Stavrogin.

to:

* CloudCuckooLander: Most of the characters take it for granted that Marya Timofeevna is one, but she seems to see through Stavrogin in a way few others can. Shatov, at least, recognizes there's more to her than meets the eye.
* TheConfidant: Darya Shatova acts as one for Nikolai Stavrogin. Also Marya Timofeevna for Shatov, and the narrator for Stepan Trofimovich.



* DoggedNiceGuy:
** Poor Mavriky is just about the only character who genuinely seems to want to do right by everyone else. He suffers for it.
** The narrator seems like a pretty decent guy too (and is definitely dogged), even if he can be a bit cranky.
* DoubleStandard: Stavrogin's sexual exploits are an open secret, but it's the women in his life who risk social ruin by getting involved with him. Liza actually attempts to take back some power by using ''Stavrogin'' for a [[NotStayingForBreakfast one-night stand]], even knowing that she'll be punished by society for it.



* GrandeDame: Varvara Petrovna is a wealthy widow and socialite eager to position herself as a fixture of society and a sponsor of the arts. Tensions occur when Yulia Mikhailovna, the wife of the new governor, tries to edge Varvara out of this role.



* HopeSpot: Shatov is reunited with his wife, Marya Ignateevna, and helps her deliver her baby. The experience binds them together emotionally, and they start preparing for their new life together. [[spoiler: [[MoodWhiplash Then Shatov is murdered, and Marya and the baby get sick and die after she goes out searching for him.]]]]



* LemonyNarrator: The peripheral narrator makes no secret of his opinions about the events he's describing, and even gets involved himself at a few points. He's also pretty snarky.
* LovingAShadow:
** Many characters love an idea of Stavrogin which has little to do with his real self. He, in turn, has a pretty patronizing view of the women in his life and is caught off guard when they exhibit agency of their own.
** Stepan Trofimovich tends to project his ideals onto whatever woman he's obsessed with at a given time.



* MessianicArchetype: PlayedWith and ultimately {{Subverted}} in the case of Stavrogin. Most of the characters view him as a savior figure, but in reality he lacks any sort of moral conviction--and has committed some truly heinous deeds to boot. The more we learn about him, the more it seems he might be more of an [[TheAntichrist Antichrist]] figure instead.
* MoodWhiplash: The [[spoiler: murder of Shatov and death of Marya Ignateevna and her newborn child]] immediately after they couple is reunited and have started planning their future together.



* NiceGuy: Few and far between in this novel, but the minor character Mavriky Nikolaevich stands out as a sincerely decent and self-sacrificing man who suffers for his kindness. The narrator also doesn’t seem so bad, though he is a bit cranky at times.



* NoodleIncident: Shatov and Kirillov journeyed to America together at some point in the past and had a falling-out. This trip is mentioned frequently and seems to have been a turning point for both of them, but the reader never learns any details.
* NotStayingForBreakfast: Stavrogin and Liza have a one-night stand. In an inversion of Stavrogin's usual dynamic with women, this time it's ''Stavrogin'' who wants to pursue the relationship further and ''Liza'' who admits she's only using him.



* OffStageVillainy: Stavrogin really doesn't do… well, much of anything in the course of the novel itself. Off-page, on the other hand, he has apparently committed just about every crime you can imagine in an attempt to alleviate his soul-crushing ennui.



* ThePowerOfLove: Becomes a theme towards the end of the book, with the reuniting of Shatov and Marya Ignateevna and then that of Stepan Trofimovich and Varvara Petrovna. These are pretty much the only truly sweet and hopeful spots amid the book's overwhelming darkness.

to:

* ThePowerOfLove: Becomes a theme towards the end of the book, with the reuniting of Shatov and Marya Ignateevna and then that of Stepan Trofimovich and Varvara Petrovna. These are pretty much the only truly sweet and [[HopeSpot hopeful spots spots]] amid the book's overwhelming darkness.darkness.
* PrincelyYoungMan: Stavrogin is young, rich, well-connected, and handsome. Another character even compares him to Prince Hal from [[Creator/WilliamShakespeare Shakespeare's]] ''Theatre/HenryIV'' plays. He receives absolutely no pleasure from any of it.
* ProperlyParanoid: The current and ex members of the radical group are all very aware that they're in danger from the authorities and especially one another at all times.



* SatanicArchetype: What would a book called ''Demons'' be without one? Verkhovensky fits this role to a T, with his snakelike personality, his skill in tempting others, and his uncanny ability to slip away just when things get really nasty. (Ironically–or maybe not?–he’s also obsessed with the designated MessianicArchetype, Stavrogin.)
* SlidingScaleOfIdealismVsCynicism: The novel is weighted ''heavily'' to the cynical end, with almost no admirable characters and a fairly hopeless ending. It's a dark one even by Dostoevsky standards.
* TheSociopath: Stepan Verkhovensky definitely qualifies. Stavrogin probably does too, though he at least recognizes it in himself and on some level wishes he was different.



* StrawAtheist: As usual with Dostoevsky, both PlayedStraight and {{Subverted}} at various times. Pretty much all of the main characters are atheists or at least struggle with the concept of faith, but they all express their disbelief in different ways. Some are portrayed as fools, but others are quite eloquent and sympathetic.

to:

* StrawAtheist: As usual with Dostoevsky, both PlayedStraight and {{Subverted}} {{Averted}} at various times. Pretty much all of the main characters are atheists or at least struggle with the concept of faith, but they all express their disbelief in different ways. Some are portrayed as fools, but others are quite eloquent and sympathetic.


Added DiffLines:

* ThreeFacesOfEve: This seems to be more or less how Stavrogin views his three main romantic interests. The self-sacrificing Darya Pavlovna is the Wife, the passionate Lizaveta is the Seductress, and the seemingly-innocent Marya Timofeevna is the Child. None of them end up being quite as simple as he imagines.


Added DiffLines:

* WideEyedIdealist: Stepan Trofimovich is one. It comes off as a totally misguided outlook in the cynical universe of this novel, and is usually PlayedForLaughs.
* WouldHurtAChild: In a chapter which was deemed too shocking to even be published in Dostoevsky's lifetime, Stavrogin reveals that he once [[spoiler: raped a young girl, who then hung herself.]] Though he has committed many other crimes, he himself acknowledges that this was his MoralEventHorizon.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Dewicked trope


* LoadsAndLoadsOfCharacters: There are something like 50 named characters in the novel, with new ones being introduced almost till the very end.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ManipulativeBastard: Verkhovensky is the absolute definition of this trope.

to:

* ManipulativeBastard: Verkhovensky is the absolute definition of this trope. Nearly all of the chaos of the novel is a deliberate result of his scheming.

Added: 2622

Changed: 380

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BeautyEqualsGoodness: Strongly {{Subverted}} with the handsome Stavrogin, who is thought of this way by many of the characters but who turns out to be almost totally defined by his ''lack'' of moral conviction.



* CharacterFilibuster: This being a Dostoevsky novel, many characters discourse on their respective political, religious, and artistic views. There's even a minor character named "Filibusterov"!
* ChekhovsGunman: Verkhovensky mentions to Stavrogin early on that there's an escaped criminal and murderer on the loose in the area. Fedka the Convict later becomes instrumental in bringing about [[spoiler: at least a couple of the novel’s many deaths.]]



* MoralMyopia: A major theme of the novel. The fivesome have convinced themselves that their political worldview justifies any crime, as long as they commit it for "the good of the cause".
* MurderMakesYouCrazy: Most of the fivesome start to mentally deteriorate within days (in some cases, minutes) of the [[spoiler: killing of Shatov.]]



* NoCelebritiesWereHarmed: Karmazinov is widely seen as a caricature on fellow writer, Creator/IvanTurgenev. (Though somewhat confusingly, it is indicated at least once that the ''actual'' Turgenev exists in the novel's universe as well.)

to:

* NiceGuy: Few and far between in this novel, but the minor character Mavriky Nikolaevich stands out as a sincerely decent and self-sacrificing man who suffers for his kindness. The narrator also doesn’t seem so bad, though he is a bit cranky at times.
* NoCelebritiesWereHarmed: Karmazinov is widely seen as a caricature on fellow writer, Creator/IvanTurgenev. (Though somewhat confusingly, it is indicated at least once that the ''actual'' Turgenev exists in the novel's universe as well.)) Various other characters are at least partially based on real-life figures as well. Verkhovensky was inspired by the revolutionary Sergei Nechaev, Stavrogin is based on an acquaintance of Dostoevsky's named Nikolai Speshnev, Stepan Trofimovich is a CompositeCharacter based on several liberal intellectuals, etc.
* ObfuscatingStupidity: This is one of Verkhovensky's favorite strategies for manipulating and extracting information from people. He's more than happy to be thought of as a fool as long as he gets what he wants from his mark.


Added DiffLines:

* ThePowerOfLove: Becomes a theme towards the end of the book, with the reuniting of Shatov and Marya Ignateevna and then that of Stepan Trofimovich and Varvara Petrovna. These are pretty much the only truly sweet and hopeful spots amid the book's overwhelming darkness.


Added DiffLines:

* StarvingStudent: Shatov is one.
* StrawAtheist: As usual with Dostoevsky, both PlayedStraight and {{Subverted}} at various times. Pretty much all of the main characters are atheists or at least struggle with the concept of faith, but they all express their disbelief in different ways. Some are portrayed as fools, but others are quite eloquent and sympathetic.


Added DiffLines:

* StrawmanPolitical: Dostoevsky has often been criticized for his less-than-subtle skewering of socialists, anarchists, and other left-wing radicals in this novel. Middle-of-the-road liberals don’t fare much better.

Changed: 49

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GenreShift: The first third of the novel is basically a social [[{{Satire}} satire]] about the clueless intelligentsia of a nondescript small town. The middle section starts to get more serious, but still retains a strong satirical bent. In the last third the book veers towards full-blown [[{{Tragedy}} tragedy]], complete with a [[EverybodyDiesEnding massive death toll.]]

to:

* GenreShift: The first third of the novel is basically a social [[{{Satire}} satire]] about the clueless intelligentsia of a nondescript small town. The middle section starts to get more serious, serious as Stavrogin and Verkhovensky enter the scene, but it still retains a strong satirical bent. In the last third the book veers towards full-blown [[{{Tragedy}} tragedy]], complete with a [[EverybodyDiesEnding massive death toll.]]

Added: 465

Removed: 465

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Neologism}}: The narrator coins the term "Shigalyovism" (''"Shigalyovschina"'', in Russian), describing the ideology of a minor character. A member of the town's secret cadre of nihilists, who range from laughable idiots to terrifying psychopaths, Shigalyov argues that it is legitimate to subject 90% of humanity to abject slavery in order that the remaining 10% may enjoy a utopian paradise. The term came into common usage in Russia during the Stalinist era.


Added DiffLines:

* {{Neologism}}: The narrator coins the term "Shigalyovism" (''"Shigalyovschina"'', in Russian), describing the ideology of a minor character. A member of the town's secret cadre of nihilists, who range from laughable idiots to terrifying psychopaths, Shigalyov argues that it is legitimate to subject 90% of humanity to abject slavery in order that the remaining 10% may enjoy a utopian paradise. The term came into common usage in Russia during the Stalinist era.

Top