Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / Riddick

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It's possible that said bounty condition was made when they heard that Riddick became the leader of the Necromongers, pretty much the scariest badass army in the universe, who had been known to wipe out star-systems, they probably wanted to kill him because of the risk him being the leader was, and they might be able to broker a deal under the whole "keep what you kill" mentality of the Necromongers.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Might HAVE, not might OF.


** It also sets up a good case of KickTheDog for Santana. He might of gotten away with just being a JerkAss in the film, but having him shoot an unarmed woman in the back after promising her freedom sets it up so that when he eventually gets his, no one is going to mourn the AssholeVictim. At least the mercs with Johns and Luna were a little more stable and less back-stabby.

to:

** It also sets up a good case of KickTheDog for Santana. He might of have gotten away with just being a JerkAss in the film, but having him shoot an unarmed woman in the back after promising her freedom sets it up so that when he eventually gets his, no one is going to mourn the AssholeVictim. At least the mercs with Johns and Luna were a little more stable and less back-stabby.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It's been a while since I saw the film, but Santanna probably wasn't thinking that far forward. So yeah, he's a massive scumbag, and an utter moron.

to:

** It's been a while since I saw the film, but Santanna probably wasn't thinking that far forward. So yeah, he's a massive scumbag, and an utter moron.moron.
** Seeing that he was a murderous a-hole to the woman he let go to send a message to Riddick, it's safe to say that if he had succeeded in raping Dahl, he seems likely he would have killed her to keep her quiet and make it look like Riddick did it. As to if Johns would see through Santanna's lie is hard to know for certain.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* So, what was Santannas big plan if he had successfully [[spoiler: Raped Dahl? Boss Johns comes back to base, finds Santanna having a post-rape cigarette, Dahl obviously raped, Boss Johns and his crew kill Santanna, also adding to the fact that Riddick was there, and he seemed like he was going to do the job if Dahl couldn't fight Santanna off.]] Was it just to show what we already knew? that Santanna is a massive scumbag?

to:

* So, what was Santannas big plan if he had successfully [[spoiler: Raped Dahl? Boss Johns comes back to base, finds Santanna having a post-rape cigarette, Dahl obviously raped, Boss Johns and his crew kill Santanna, also adding to the fact that Riddick was there, and he seemed like he was going to do the job if Dahl couldn't fight Santanna off.]] Was it just to show what we already knew? that Santanna is a massive scumbag?scumbag?
** It's been a while since I saw the film, but Santanna probably wasn't thinking that far forward. So yeah, he's a massive scumbag, and an utter moron.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Actually Vaako ''did'' intend to keep his word and send Riddick to Furya, knowing that if he sent him anywhere else, Riddick would come back and promote him to full dead.



** They were supposed to be drilled into the bone, the length is a case of ArtisticLicenseMedicine and SciFiWritersHaveNoSenseOfScale.

to:

** They were supposed to be drilled into the bone, the length is a case of ArtisticLicenseMedicine and SciFiWritersHaveNoSenseOfScale.SciFiWritersHaveNoSenseOfScale.
* So, what was Santannas big plan if he had successfully [[spoiler: Raped Dahl? Boss Johns comes back to base, finds Santanna having a post-rape cigarette, Dahl obviously raped, Boss Johns and his crew kill Santanna, also adding to the fact that Riddick was there, and he seemed like he was going to do the job if Dahl couldn't fight Santanna off.]] Was it just to show what we already knew? that Santanna is a massive scumbag?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The extended scenes and ending of the Director's Cut elaborate on that, showing that Krone was in it on his own (and with his goons) to kill Riddick. He mentions that the Necromongers should never allow outsiders like Riddick, or merciful souls like Vaako, showing that Vaako didn't care to kill Riddick. He could tell that Riddick didn't give a damn about being a Necromonger, and that made it easy to tempt him with the location Furya to get him out of the fleet. He gave false coordinates, but all he wanted was Riddick gone, so that he could continue the journey to Underverse and attain "transcendence" and become an undead Lord Marshall like in the previous film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** There may be jurisdictions where bounty hunters are ''only'' allowed to go if they're seeking to bring people in alive. By claiming they're pursuing the "Alive" side of the contract, they can search those areas for Riddick and then kill him "in self-defense" if they find him. Or just haul him off alive and shoot him the instant they're out of that jurisdiction.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** According to the wiki, Johns Junior is 38 years old but after taking away the time spent in cryo he's closer to 29.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the beginning Riddick splints his broken leg with the pieces of his armor. However, he fixes the plates onto his leg with spikes he drills into his flesh. Then later he is seen limping with that leg. How is it possible that that kind of flesh-fixed splint is able to keep itself together without those spikes ripping off from his flesh? The whole point of having a skeleton is that the flesh is too soft and stretchy to support a grown man's weight. Even if Riddick could handle the pain of such a setup, the flesh itself has too much give to fix those spikes securely enough. There would be so much movement with every step that they would come loose in no time. Maybe those spikes were supposed to be drilled all the way to the bone, but they didn't seem long enough for that.

to:

* In the beginning Riddick splints his broken leg with the pieces of his armor. However, he fixes the plates onto his leg with spikes he drills into his flesh. Then later he is seen limping with that leg. How is it possible that that kind of flesh-fixed splint is able to keep itself together without those spikes ripping off from his flesh? The whole point of having a skeleton is that the flesh is too soft and stretchy to support a grown man's weight. Even if Riddick could handle the pain of such a setup, the flesh itself has too much give to fix those spikes securely enough. There would be so much movement with every step that they would come loose in no time. Maybe those spikes were supposed to be drilled all the way to the bone, but they didn't seem long enough for that.that.
** They were supposed to be drilled into the bone, the length is a case of ArtisticLicenseMedicine and SciFiWritersHaveNoSenseOfScale.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The actual reason may be simpler: When Santana is trying to persuade Johnns' crew that there's no reason to land, he refers to his crew being (part of) a clan. Luna's probably on the crew because he's part of the (extended) family.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** That's partially how [[Tropers/CurledUpWithDakka I]] took it. Whoever set the contract wanted Riddick ''at all'', preferably dead (as indicated by the pricing); however, if 'circumstances' dictated that Riddick was alive (e.g. get him into the ship to kill him, set on autopilot, running battle until ship arrives, Riddick is presented alive to the contractor), then whoever brought him in would still get something for the trouble. Not as much, since the contractor now has to deal with a pissed Riddick...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
adding new question


* Why send assassins to kill Riddick when the entire creed of the Necromongers was, 'You keep what you kill' when Riddick gained leadership over them after killing the previous Lord Marshall? If any of the three assassins Krone brought with him successfully kills Riddick, he's gonna get shot too if the assassin has any brains knowing Krone will betray him too.

to:

* Why send assassins to kill Riddick when the entire creed of the Necromongers was, 'You keep what you kill' when Riddick gained leadership over them after killing the previous Lord Marshall? If any of the three assassins Krone brought with him successfully kills Riddick, he's gonna get shot too if the assassin has any brains knowing Krone will betray him too.too.
* In the beginning Riddick splints his broken leg with the pieces of his armor. However, he fixes the plates onto his leg with spikes he drills into his flesh. Then later he is seen limping with that leg. How is it possible that that kind of flesh-fixed splint is able to keep itself together without those spikes ripping off from his flesh? The whole point of having a skeleton is that the flesh is too soft and stretchy to support a grown man's weight. Even if Riddick could handle the pain of such a setup, the flesh itself has too much give to fix those spikes securely enough. There would be so much movement with every step that they would come loose in no time. Maybe those spikes were supposed to be drilled all the way to the bone, but they didn't seem long enough for that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** In the motion comic that was used as a trailer for the movie, there's a more detailed version of Riddick's flashback. The scene with the Necromonger fleet is labeled "en route to the Underverse" so Riddick probably set a direct course toward the threshold, without ravaging any planets.

to:

*** In the motion comic that was used as a trailer for the movie, there's a more detailed version of Riddick's flashback. The scene with the Necromonger fleet is labeled "en route to the Underverse" so Riddick probably set a direct course toward the threshold, threshold (which was exactly what he did at the end of the novelization of the previous movie), without ravaging any planets.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** In the motion comic that was used as a trailer for the movie, there's a more detailed version of Riddick's flashback. The scene with the Necromonger fleet is labeled "en route to the Underverse" so Riddick probably set a direct course toward the threshold, without ravaging any planets.

to:

*** In the motion comic that was used as a trailer for the movie, there's a more detailed version of Riddick's flashback. The scene with the Necromonger fleet is labeled "en route to the Underverse" so Riddick probably set a direct course toward the threshold, without ravaging any planets.planets.
* Why send assassins to kill Riddick when the entire creed of the Necromongers was, 'You keep what you kill' when Riddick gained leadership over them after killing the previous Lord Marshall? If any of the three assassins Krone brought with him successfully kills Riddick, he's gonna get shot too if the assassin has any brains knowing Krone will betray him too.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Alternately, cold sleep during interstellar travel may suspend the aging process, so the father might not seem that much older than the son if he spent a lot more time in such a state than his offspring.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It also sets up a good case of KickTheDog for Santana. He might of gotten away with just being a JerkAss in the film, but having him shoot an unarmed woman in the back after promising her freedom sets it up so that when he eventually gets his, no one is going to mourn the AssholeVictim. At least the mercs with Johns and Luna were a little more stable and less back-stabby.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** That was different. In Chronicles of Riddick, Riddick is essentially a nobody to the majority of Necromongers. The Lord Marshall was concerned because of the prophesy (which considering he had at least one Furian in his army he clearly doesn't take but so seriously) by this point Riddick IS the Lord Marshall. The man who "killed" him presumably went home and claimed the title of Lord Marshall for himself in keeping with the you Keep what you Kill code. As mentioned above it's probably a high crime to claim a kill that isn't yours or didn't happen especially if said kill elevates you to the rank of Lord Marshall.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Aside from that, we learn that there were certain requirements Riddick "never got around to doing", so he probably wasn't the LM for long and since he wasn't as keen on invading planets as the other Necromongers were, likely didn't cause much trouble.

to:

** Aside from that, we learn that there were certain requirements Riddick "never got around to doing", so he probably wasn't the LM for long and since he wasn't as keen on invading planets as the other Necromongers were, likely didn't cause much trouble.trouble.
*** In the motion comic that was used as a trailer for the movie, there's a more detailed version of Riddick's flashback. The scene with the Necromonger fleet is labeled "en route to the Underverse" so Riddick probably set a direct course toward the threshold, without ravaging any planets.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also, Santanna gives as an explanation that he's a good luck charm.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also, maybe the son was younger than he appeared but due to a hard life of bounty-hunting [[spoiler: as well as his addiction]], appeared older. Matthew Nable's character seemed pretty disciplined and likely took better care of himself.

Top