Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Does raise the question of why he didn't ask the Agent to shoot him (Gant) instead, considering how well the real muzzle is hidden.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** If he tried to shoot himself the bullet would have gone harmlessly in the opposite direction and presumably Gant would have rewarded the agent by giving him a second chance.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* Related to the above scene, Gant's analogy was ridiculous. How often did knights fall on their own swords in shame for failing their king, let alone have it done as a ''rule''? Either Gant flunked history or he should've said that it was the ''samurai'' that fell on their swords.
to:
* Related to the above scene, Gant's analogy was ridiculous. How often did knights fall on their own swords in shame for failing their king, let alone have it done as a ''rule''? Either Gant flunked history or he should've said that it was the ''samurai'' that fell on their swords.swords.
** Except samurai didn't fall on their swords, they cut their stomachs open and were beheaded by a second. Romans fell on their swords. So, y'know.
** Except samurai didn't fall on their swords, they cut their stomachs open and were beheaded by a second. Romans fell on their swords. So, y'know.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* Gant made that agent try to shoot himself with a gun that shoots backwards. So what would he have done if the agent ''did'' try shooting himself?
to:
* Gant made that tried making an agent try to shoot himself with a gun that shoots backwards. So what would he have done if the agent ''did'' try shooting himself?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
** I imagine it's sort of like writing "Fuck you" on the side of a bomb. A bomb without "Fuck you" written on the side still blows up your enemies just as well, but writing "Fuck you" on the side of it is more satisfying for the bomb-dropper.
to:
** I imagine it's sort of like writing "Fuck you" on the side of a bomb. A bomb without "Fuck you" written on the side still blows up your enemies just as well, but writing "Fuck you" on the side of it is more satisfying for the bomb-dropper.bomb-dropper.
* Gant made that agent try to shoot himself with a gun that shoots backwards. So what would he have done if the agent ''did'' try shooting himself?
* Related to the above scene, Gant's analogy was ridiculous. How often did knights fall on their own swords in shame for failing their king, let alone have it done as a ''rule''? Either Gant flunked history or he should've said that it was the ''samurai'' that fell on their swords.
* Gant made that agent try to shoot himself with a gun that shoots backwards. So what would he have done if the agent ''did'' try shooting himself?
* Related to the above scene, Gant's analogy was ridiculous. How often did knights fall on their own swords in shame for failing their king, let alone have it done as a ''rule''? Either Gant flunked history or he should've said that it was the ''samurai'' that fell on their swords.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* Sever performs the ''coupe de gras'' with the MacGuffin nanobot mounted onto a bullet. A ''nanobot mounted onto a bullet''. Poetic Justice though it may be, wouldn't the bullet be just as likely to kill Gant on its own, without the help of the nanobot?
to:
* Sever performs the ''coupe de gras'' grace'' with the MacGuffin nanobot mounted onto a bullet. A ''nanobot mounted onto a bullet''. Poetic Justice though it may be, wouldn't the bullet be just as likely to kill Gant on its own, without the help of the nanobot?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* Sever performs the ''coupe de gras'' with the MacGuffin nanobot mounted onto a bullet. A ''nanobot mounted onto a bullet'. Poetic Justice though it may be, wouldn't the bullet be just as likely to kill Gant on its own, without the help of the nanobot?
to:
* Sever performs the ''coupe de gras'' with the MacGuffin nanobot mounted onto a bullet. A ''nanobot mounted onto a bullet'.bullet''. Poetic Justice though it may be, wouldn't the bullet be just as likely to kill Gant on its own, without the help of the nanobot?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* Sever performs the ''coupe de gras'' with the MacGuffin nanobot mounted onto a bullet. A ''nanobot mounted onto a bullet'. Poetic Justice though it may be, wouldn't the bullet be just as likely to kill Gant on its own, without the help of the nanobot?
to:
* Sever performs the ''coupe de gras'' with the MacGuffin nanobot mounted onto a bullet. A ''nanobot mounted onto a bullet'. Poetic Justice though it may be, wouldn't the bullet be just as likely to kill Gant on its own, without the help of the nanobot?nanobot?
** I imagine it's sort of like writing "Fuck you" on the side of a bomb. A bomb without "Fuck you" written on the side still blows up your enemies just as well, but writing "Fuck you" on the side of it is more satisfying for the bomb-dropper.
** I imagine it's sort of like writing "Fuck you" on the side of a bomb. A bomb without "Fuck you" written on the side still blows up your enemies just as well, but writing "Fuck you" on the side of it is more satisfying for the bomb-dropper.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* Sever performs the ''coupe de gras'' with the MacGuffin nanobot mounted onto a bullet. A ''nanobot mounted onto a bullet'. Poetic Justice though it may be, wouldn't the bullet be just as likely to kill Gant on its own, without the help of the nanobot?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removing Understatement sinkhole
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* That Gant could successfully make it seem to Ecks and his wife that the other had died via the same car bomb, and that Gant could subsequently go on to marry his wife, and that Ecks would never notice that the director of the organization he worked for was married to his own wife whom he thought was dead, or vice versa, and so forth, seems [[{{Understatement}} pretty damn unlikely]]. There's the whole business of funerals, as well as the fact that they would probably run towards the smoldering wreck crying each other's names and therefore hear each other, among other things.
to:
* That Gant could successfully make it seem to Ecks and his wife that the other had died via the same car bomb, and that Gant could subsequently go on to marry his wife, and that Ecks would never notice that the director of the organization he worked for was married to his own wife whom he thought was dead, or vice versa, and so forth, seems [[{{Understatement}} pretty damn unlikely]].unlikely. There's the whole business of funerals, as well as the fact that they would probably run towards the smoldering wreck crying each other's names and therefore hear each other, among other things.
