Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / AntMan1

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Agents of SHIELD confirmed this and eliminated this headscratcher. Hydra simply fractured into a bunch of cells, some large, some small, some remaining sleeper. They're still around and active until well after this movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
moved from Fridge

Added DiffLines:

[[/folder]]

[[folder:Cut Darren Cross a check]]
* Cross Technologies' innovations have plenty of application even without shrinking living organisms. Miniaturizing ''any'' inanimate object, having a gun that reduced an opponent to a snot in one shot and building a functioning suit of battle armor that can fly and does ''not'' require an Arc Reactor to run - all of those breakthroughs have military uses of their own. It could be that Cross' judgment is affected by Pym particles, making him fixed on the Yellowjacket idea. Not to mention his dealings with HYDRA. It can also be explained by Cross's obsession with recreating Pym's work exactly, to prove his superiority, that he's a worthy successor of sorts.
** Indeed, it's even possible that one consistent aspect of the Pym Particles' effects on the human nervous system is ''an addiction to Pym particle exposure''. In which case, Hank's resolution to never use the Ant-Man suit again is even more impressive, and his reluctance to let Hope follow in her mother's footsteps, even more understandable. Cross' obsession with perfecting and donning a shrink-capable Yellowjacket suit isn't just a psychological compulsion: he's ''a junkie pursuing the ultimate high''.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Risking his life's work]]
* If Scott had failed his initial test in the Ant-Man suit – getting out of the bathtub – Hank Pym's life's work would have been literally lost down the drain. That seems like... a big risk for him to take.
** Hank may have personally experienced getting flushed down drains in the past, and known that the helmet is watertight enough for Scott to survive the experience. A far-from-''pleasant'' experience, but possibly safer overall than getting flung off a record player, scrambling among stomping feet on a dance floor, getting sucked up a vacuum cleaner or pursued by a mouse that thinks you're a yummy bug.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** It's sort of a win-win for Cross. If the Ant-Man suit (and Scott) are destroyed, nobody knows, and -- more importantly -- he's rid of the only competition for his tech. If the Ant-Man suit gets through, then Cross can say, "A piece of 30-year-old technology just got through nearly every security system money can buy. Mine has all of that, plus it can fly and shoot lasers," then ratchet up the price.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*** And we're back into headscratcher territory, since not only did the MCU's take on Zemo have no connections to Hydra, but he explicitly said they can go to hell.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Headscratchers are Spoilers Off


* Wait, so [[spoiler: Cross knew Hank, Hope and Scott were planning a heist, but he wanted it to happen just so he could get his hand on the Ant-Man suit as well ? Then why did he put a miniature laser grid that would have destroyed the suit had they done a tiny mistake or had something out of their control been preventing them from shutting it off (like what almost happened) ? Couldn't he put in place another safety protocol that wouldn't have raised suspicion on the heroes' part but wouldn't be as destructive for the thing he wants to acquire ?]]
** Since he had JUST [[spoiler:perfected his own suit and particles, perhaps he only wanted the Ant-Man suit to take it out of the running. Destroying it with the laser grid would have been one way to do that.]]
** Also, [[spoiler:he didn't really care if he got the Ant-Man suit. It was just a bonus if Scott made it through, so he could rub it in Hank's face. Also also, he was ''crazy'' at this point.]]

to:

* Wait, so [[spoiler: Cross knew Hank, Hope and Scott were planning a heist, but he wanted it to happen just so he could get his hand on the Ant-Man suit as well ? Then why did he put a miniature laser grid that would have destroyed the suit had they done a tiny mistake or had something out of their control been preventing them from shutting it off (like what almost happened) ? Couldn't he put in place another safety protocol that wouldn't have raised suspicion on the heroes' part but wouldn't be as destructive for the thing he wants to acquire ?]]
?
** Since he had JUST [[spoiler:perfected perfected his own suit and particles, perhaps he only wanted the Ant-Man suit to take it out of the running. Destroying it with the laser grid would have been one way to do that.]]
that.
** Also, [[spoiler:he he didn't really care if he got the Ant-Man suit. It was just a bonus if Scott made it through, so he could rub it in Hank's face. Also also, he was ''crazy'' at this point.]]
point.



* Hope's mother, [[spoiler:Janet, the Wasp, went subatomic decades ago, and into the titanium shell of an ICBM that splashed in the ocean, at that. Even if she had somehow survived without air, food, or water, and even if Hank figured out how to enter the "quantum realm" on his own, how would he expect to ''find'' an infinitesimally tiny person in an infinitely larger world?]]
** Don't know how he'd find her, but to get to her it could be some variation of the Wait Calculation. [[spoiler:Janet wearing the suit decades ago shrank at a certain speed. Hank with a more advanced tech could shrink at a faster rate to catch up.]]
** [[spoiler:As far as how she'd survive all this time, Hank seems to think that time doesn't work the same way in the quantum realm. So if he could ever find a way to retrieve her, it's possible that Janet would have been effectively frozen in time for the last 30 years.]]
** All this "quantum" talk could might make one think that the movie might somehow be setting up [[spoiler:The Time Stone.]] That didn't end up happening, but it could still be involved in finding her in the future some how.

to:

* Hope's mother, [[spoiler:Janet, Janet, the Wasp, went subatomic decades ago, and into the titanium shell of an ICBM that splashed in the ocean, at that. Even if she had somehow survived without air, food, or water, and even if Hank figured out how to enter the "quantum realm" on his own, how would he expect to ''find'' an infinitesimally tiny person in an infinitely larger world?]]
world?
** Don't know how he'd find her, but to get to her it could be some variation of the Wait Calculation. [[spoiler:Janet Janet wearing the suit decades ago shrank at a certain speed. Hank with a more advanced tech could shrink at a faster rate to catch up.]]
up.
** [[spoiler:As As far as how she'd survive all this time, Hank seems to think that time doesn't work the same way in the quantum realm. So if he could ever find a way to retrieve her, it's possible that Janet would have been effectively frozen in time for the last 30 years.]]
years.
** All this "quantum" talk could might make one think that the movie might somehow be setting up [[spoiler:The the Time Stone.]] Stone. That didn't end up happening, but it could still be involved in finding her in the future some how.



** [[spoiler: Hank said that neither space nor time work the same in the Quantum Realm. If the MCU's metaplot involves bringing her back, her physical location in space when she entered it wouldn't necessarily confine her any more than her location in time.]]

to:

** [[spoiler: Hank said that neither space nor time work the same in the Quantum Realm. If the MCU's metaplot involves bringing her back, her physical location in space when she entered it wouldn't necessarily confine her any more than her location in time.]]



* If the plan was to [[spoiler: blow up (then implode) the entire Pym Technologies building, why did the protagonists first short out all the servers]]?

to:

* If the plan was to [[spoiler: blow up (then implode) the entire Pym Technologies building, why did the protagonists first short out all the servers]]?servers?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** They can't just vote Cross out of the company without a legitimate reason to doubt his abilities as chairman, and they don't have any actual evidence that he's dangerous without proving the risk of the Pym particles, which in turn means they would prove that Cross's plans for the particles are legitimate and raise questions about their motives for opposing his actions in the first place.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[/folder]]

[[folder: The Ownership of Pym Industries]]
* What exactly prevented Hank and Hope from simply taking the company back from Cross? The way Cross took over suggests her shares make the difference.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** In the original comics, it's said that Pym Particles alter the size of things by shunting the affected object(or person)'s mass into an "alternate dimension". That dimension could well be the "quantum realm" Hank refers to. When an object shrinks, its mass is displaced into the realm. When it grows, mass is gleans from the realm and added to the target object, giving it increased weight, density and strength. This would be a reasonable handwave to explain some of the aforementioned inconsistencies, at least in this troper's opinion.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The Triskelion may have originally been built to house multiple agencies, SHIELD among them. It just so happens that by the time of Winter Soldier, SHIELD grew until it took up all of the building, and the other agencies were either absorbed or had to move out.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Plus not everyone has as extreme a reaction to age differences as people on TVTropes headscratchers pages seem to. There's a reason "squicky" is subjective.

to:

** Plus not everyone has as extreme a reaction to age differences as people on TVTropes Wiki/TVTropes headscratchers pages seem to. There's a reason "squicky" is subjective.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Depends on how they did it. If they built up enough ants between the hammer and the pin, the hammer might not have been able to move enough to build up any real amount of force. Also it's quite possible at least a few of them got crushed... Scott does do his best to protect the ants and not use them disposably, but here and there he might have to make sacrifices.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Plus not everyone has as extreme a reaction to age differences as people on TVTropes headscratchers pages seem to. There's a reason "squicky" is subjective.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Besides, if it was part of Phase 3, that would leave Phase 2 with only five movies versus Phase 1's six movies. Giving the next phase less movies than the previous one would probably give the studio a bad rep.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Replacing meta complaint with in-universe one.


* What was the point of using a Glock 17 (which doesn't have an external hammer) for the "ants stop the pistol's hammer" scene? Is it supposed to be a fictional model, like the infamous [[Film/DieHard2 Glock 7]]? Why didn't they just use a Colt M1911 or ''any'' other handgun that ''does'' have an external hammer for that scene? According to the Internet Movie Firearms Database, Cross actually has a Beretta 92FS Inox (which has an external hammer) in another scene, so why didn't they just use that instead?

to:

* What was the point How exactly can a bunch of using a Glock 17 (which doesn't have an external hammer) for the "ants ants stop the pistol's hammer" scene? Is it Glock's hammer ([[ArtisticLicenseEngineering even if they really did have those]]) without getting crushed or snapped in two? Sure, ants are supposed to be able to lift objects several times their own weight, but does that really apply to a fictional model, moving object, like the infamous [[Film/DieHard2 Glock 7]]? Why didn't they just use a Colt M1911 or ''any'' other handgun that ''does'' have an gun's external hammer for that scene? According to the Internet Movie Firearms Database, Cross actually has a Beretta 92FS Inox (which has an external hammer) in another scene, so why didn't they just use that instead?
hammer?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[/folder]]

[[folder: The Glock]]
* What was the point of using a Glock 17 (which doesn't have an external hammer) for the "ants stop the pistol's hammer" scene? Is it supposed to be a fictional model, like the infamous [[Film/DieHard2 Glock 7]]? Why didn't they just use a Colt M1911 or ''any'' other handgun that ''does'' have an external hammer for that scene? According to the Internet Movie Firearms Database, Cross actually has a Beretta 92FS Inox (which has an external hammer) in another scene, so why didn't they just use that instead?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Time surely still works the same than in does in the grand scheme of things. What Pym surely meant is that in the subatomic realm time is "different" because everyting around someone looks like an infine nothingness, and there is no way for the human mind to actually ''notice'' the pass of time.

to:

** Time surely still works the same than in does in the grand scheme of things. What Pym surely meant is that in the subatomic realm time is "different" because everyting everything around someone looks like an infine infinite nothingness, and there is no way for the human mind to actually ''notice'' the pass of time.



* Perhaps that's not the greatest point for movie with questionable relation to physics, but when Scott goes subatomic, how can he still hear Cassie calling out for him? I understand it in all the other cases, ants have no problem with that, but shouldn't the soundwaves at this point be too big for Scott's ears to process them coherently, or even catch the entirety of them?

to:

* Perhaps that's not the greatest point for movie with questionable relation to physics, but when Scott goes subatomic, how can he still hear Cassie calling out for him? I understand it in all the other cases, ants have no problem with that, but shouldn't the soundwaves sound waves at this point be too big for Scott's ears to process them coherently, or even catch the entirety of them?



** Same reason Obediah Stane only used his super-awesome paralysing device once: the villains of these movies are so obsessed with copying the achievements of the heroes that they don't pay attention to the potential of the weapons they have...

to:

** Same reason Obediah Obadiah Stane only used his super-awesome paralysing paralyzing device once: the villains of these movies are so obsessed with copying the achievements of the heroes that they don't pay attention to the potential of the weapons they have...



** Is it? Hydra already has discs that turns you first into stone and then into dust. The only improvement the gun would provide is using extremely rare ammunition just to make it soundless (but a disc still isneasier to conceal than a gun), so it's not really worth it.

to:

** Is it? Hydra already has discs that turns you first into stone and then into dust. The only improvement the gun would provide is using extremely rare ammunition just to make it soundless (but a disc still isneasier is easier to conceal than a gun), so it's not really worth it.



* It's previously been established that SHIELD, although an important organization dealing with superscience and other oddities, wasn't particularly well known or large until the turn of the century. It was implied in ''Film/CaptainAmericaTheWinterSoldier'' that the Triskelion and SHIELD expansion happened as a result of the Chitauri invasion, justifying why the United States is okay with a multinational run paramilitary base being built at the capital, rather than freaking out about it (the United Nations Building in NYC was met with resistance when established, and that wasn't the capital). Seems like a major retcon.

to:

* It's previously been established that SHIELD, although an important organization dealing with superscience super science and other oddities, wasn't particularly well known or large until the turn of the century. It was implied in ''Film/CaptainAmericaTheWinterSoldier'' that the Triskelion and SHIELD expansion happened as a result of the Chitauri invasion, justifying why the United States is okay with a multinational run paramilitary base being built at the capital, rather than freaking out about it (the United Nations Building in NYC was met with resistance when established, and that wasn't the capital). Seems like a major retcon.



** Both times we see someone shrink to get through titanium we see them aim for whatever tiny gaps exist between the titanium plates rather than between molicules. Scott, as mentioned before, was still large enough to smash up the circuitry on his way to subatomic so it's very possible neither of them were actually subatomic until long after they got past the titanium. Additionally, for the Yellowjacket suit, it was shown Cross has been able to shrink inorganic objects for a while at the start of the movie, whose to say he didn't shrink some micro-circuitry to allow a more compact suit? A microchip shrunk at even the standard scale shown ( from 5'10 to a fraction of an inch) would make for a VERY small chip.

to:

** Both times we see someone shrink to get through titanium we see them aim for whatever tiny gaps exist between the titanium plates rather than between molicules.molecules. Scott, as mentioned before, was still large enough to smash up the circuitry on his way to subatomic so it's very possible neither of them were actually subatomic until long after they got past the titanium. Additionally, for the Yellowjacket suit, it was shown Cross has been able to shrink inorganic objects for a while at the start of the movie, whose to say he didn't shrink some micro-circuitry to allow a more compact suit? A microchip shrunk at even the standard scale shown ( from 5'10 to a fraction of an inch) would make for a VERY small chip.



* When Scott and Cross end up at the house with the pool, Paxton and his partner arrive inmediatly despite earlier following the crashing helicopter in a car that would have crashed somewhere else, and it's unlikely they would have known about the shrinking ability or even be able to follow the suitcase.

to:

* When Scott and Cross end up at the house with the pool, Paxton and his partner arrive inmediatly immediately despite earlier following the crashing helicopter in a car that would have crashed somewhere else, and it's unlikely they would have known about the shrinking ability or even be able to follow the suitcase.



** Whilst getting into the one-piece leather Ant-Man suit does stretch credulity, there's nothing to say the Yellowjacket isn't modular or specially designed to facilitate quick-changes, like Iron Man's briefcase armour or the Mk VII through XLII suits.

to:

** Whilst getting into the one-piece leather Ant-Man suit does stretch credulity, there's nothing to say the Yellowjacket isn't modular or specially designed to facilitate quick-changes, like Iron Man's briefcase armour armor or the Mk VII through XLII suits.



** I don't think I'm crazy, and I don't see much of a meaningful difference. The difference Cross is supposed to be "missing" is that most people would probably think lambs are cuter than mice, but that's not a rational reason to avoid using lambs over mice, and rationality is practically the opposite of craziness. Perhaps he gets some fun out of upsetting people by pretending to miss the cute factor and daring underlings to try and explain it to him in a lab setting. You might call that crazy. But I think the most likely explanation for his behaviour is that he's a scientist so focused on his objective that cuteness is irrelevant to him.

to:

** I don't think I'm crazy, and I don't see much of a meaningful difference. The difference Cross is supposed to be "missing" is that most people would probably think lambs are cuter than mice, but that's not a rational reason to avoid using lambs over mice, and rationality is practically the opposite of craziness. Perhaps he gets some fun out of upsetting people by pretending to miss the cute factor and daring underlings to try and explain it to him in a lab setting. You might call that crazy. But I think the most likely explanation for his behaviour behavior is that he's a scientist so focused on his objective that cuteness is irrelevant to him.



** Perhaps they're shocked at first, but it's been common knowledge for the past three years that they live in a world of superheroes and supervillains.

to:

** Perhaps they're shocked at first, but it's been common knowledge for the past three years that they live in a world of superheroes and supervillains.super villains.



* It seems unnecessary to say Darren Cross' s mind was corrupted by Pym Particles. Why add that line in there? Why not have him be a greedy jerk? Obadiah Stane and Justin Hammer were sociopaths. There were no scientific explanation for their evilness. Now let's talk about the hero of the movie, Scott. It seems like Disney wants to turn Scott into Robin Hood to make him likeable. I don't see it being necessary. In real life, criminals can change their ways. If Scott was a selfish thief who changes his thieving ways for his daughter, viewers would still love him.

to:

* It seems unnecessary to say Darren Cross' s mind was corrupted by Pym Particles. Why add that line in there? Why not have him be a greedy jerk? Obadiah Stane and Justin Hammer were sociopaths. There were no scientific explanation for their evilness. Now let's talk about the hero of the movie, Scott. It seems like Disney wants to turn Scott into Robin Hood to make him likeable.likable. I don't see it being necessary. In real life, criminals can change their ways. If Scott was a selfish thief who changes his thieving ways for his daughter, viewers would still love him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** They might still be traumatized, of course, but more along the lines of a RealLife person witnessing a meth lab explosion that destroys a house on their street. Scary and disturbing and maybe grounds for moving to another neighborhood, but not ''impossible''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Paxton may have been the one who investigated Scott's previous crime, and met Cassie's mom while conducting that investigation. He and she became involved after Scott went to prison, when she was no longer ethically off-limits; when Scott's name came up in connection with a new offense, Paxton was called in because he already knew so much about the suspect. He probably wasn't officially the detective on the case, just a consultant in the investigation who stayed interested in its outcome and poked around a little on his own time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** For all we know, Cross just happens to have a sheep farm as part of his investment portfolio. Sheep farms slaughter their excess male lambs every season, so why not use them for something besides lamb chops?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** That and there's also the fact that a child would expect the person who just came inside their room - an "intimate" territory - to be someone they know. Since children have significantly smaller relationship circles, the choice here is limited. And now, we know she still has a good relationship with her dad and calls to him for help: she called for him, so that must be him who came to her rescue. Added to the fact that her dad is her hero, like the first troper said.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Right, the regulator for such a thing is probably an extremely, extremely complex piece of machinery and would have many different states between working exactly as it should (regulates how small you can shrink and exactly how much you shrink) and broken (there is no regulation at all). Maybe it was bent, twisted, or shorting out in such a way that it had locked Hank at between five and two inches tall.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Well Cross being affected adds a few things; One, the reason the full suit and headgear is needed, which Cross didn't use when creating his own version of the particles. And two, he was at one point a decent guy, which is why Hank took him under his wing. Considering the falling out he had with SHIELD, Hank would have been far more wary of letting someone initially like Stain or Hammer into his work. I think you already answered the question regarding Scott. They established him already having a good moral compass even while committing crimes. It's easier to build likability in someone who's doing the right thing, if not the legal thing, than someone who was bad at the start. And it rolls back to Hank again. Hank didn't just pick Scott for his skills at burglary, but also because he had a moral compass the whole time.

to:

** Well Cross being affected adds a few things; One, the reason the full suit and headgear is needed, which Cross didn't use when creating his own version of the particles. And two, he was at one point a decent guy, which is why Hank took him under his wing. Considering the falling out he had with SHIELD, Hank would have been far more wary of letting someone initially like Stain Stane or Hammer into his work. I think you already answered the question regarding Scott. They established him already having a good moral compass even while committing crimes. It's easier to build likability in someone who's doing the right thing, if not the legal thing, than someone who was bad at the start. And it rolls back to Hank again. Hank didn't just pick Scott for his skills at burglary, but also because he had a moral compass the whole time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Or any number of subatomic particles, perhaps even ones we haven't discovered yet.


Added DiffLines:

** Quantum mechanics is ''weird''. There actually have been subatomic particles discovered that have no mass, something thought to be impossible until they found them. And the fundamental truth of quantum mechanics, if there is such a thing, is that the farther down you go, the less sense things make from our frame of reference. Either Scott had shrunk so far that he was beyond where even the partially-understood rules of quantum mechanics hold sway, or things were just so incomprehensible to him that his brain decided to render it all as blackness, having no frame of reference for him to see anything else.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Exactly. Falcon is the one asking after superpowered individuals, giving her just the description of "a guy." Her reply is that there's lots of guys with powers running around now, so he'll have to narrow it down. Of course, Spider-Man does all three (jumps, swings, crawls on walls), so it's really just a nice sneaky reference to him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** But what are the odds ''Sam'' knows that? When Scott said he "needed to borrow a piece of technology," Sam was probably thinking a doohickey off of War Machine's suit, or one of the new toys Stark had carted in to make the Avengers base state-of-the-art, or something with really dangerous applications. Who would think to check an ancient storeroom of thirty year old SHIELD tech?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Luis also comments of Hank Pym's house that "it's a classic Scott Lang mark," strongly implying that he's done other jobs before. Personally, I think there was some confusion between multiple drafts of the script, one having Scott as a career criminal, and another establishing that he'd only committed one very noble crime to make him more sympathetic to the audience, and bits of both drafts made it into the final. But one could infer that Scott's motives for crime have usually been about helping more than just himself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Well Cross being affected adds a few things; One, the reason the full suit and headgear is needed, which Cross didn't use when creating his own version of the particles. And two, he was at one point a decent guy, which is why Hank took him under his wing. Considering the falling out he had with SHIELD, Hank would have been far more wary of letting someone initially like Stain or Hammer into his work. I think you already answered the question regarding Scott. They established him already having a good moral compass even while committing crimes. It's easier to build likability in someone who's doing the right thing, if not the legal thing, than someone who was bad at the start. And it rolls back to Hank again. Hank didn't just pick Scott for his skills at burglary, but also because he had a moral compass the whole time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


*** It does bug me when problems with story-telling fall back on "This is how it is in the comics." Marvel's Cinematic Universe is great in that they have a chance to re-imagine their existing stories and take out logical failings while maintaining the spirit of their comic franchise.

to:

*** ** It does bug me when problems with story-telling fall back on "This is how it is in the comics." Marvel's Cinematic Universe is great in that they have a chance to re-imagine their existing stories and take out logical failings while maintaining the spirit of their comic franchise.



*** What hurts this is the attempt to explain it. They used actual science, which opened it up to being scrutinized, and it makes the inconsistencies stand out. The writers would have been better off just declaring that it's magical tech so they don't have to be consistent with the way it works, and you can still have your Thomas the Tank engine crush a car.

to:

*** ** What hurts this is the attempt to explain it. They used actual science, which opened it up to being scrutinized, and it makes the inconsistencies stand out. The writers would have been better off just declaring that it's magical tech so they don't have to be consistent with the way it works, and you can still have your Thomas the Tank engine crush a car.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* It seems unecessary to say Darren Cross' s mind was corrupted by Pym Particles. Why add that line in there? Why not have him be a greedy jerk? Obediah Stane and Justin Hammer were sociopaths. There were no scientific explantion for their evilness. Now let's talk about the hero of the movie, Scott. It seems like Disney wants to turn Scott into Robin Hood to make him likeable. I don't see it being necessary. In real life, criminals can change their ways. If Scott was a selfish thief who changes his thieving ways for his daughter, viewers would still love him.

to:

* It seems unecessary unnecessary to say Darren Cross' s mind was corrupted by Pym Particles. Why add that line in there? Why not have him be a greedy jerk? Obediah Obadiah Stane and Justin Hammer were sociopaths. There were no scientific explantion explanation for their evilness. Now let's talk about the hero of the movie, Scott. It seems like Disney wants to turn Scott into Robin Hood to make him likeable. I don't see it being necessary. In real life, criminals can change their ways. If Scott was a selfish thief who changes his thieving ways for his daughter, viewers would still love him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* It seems unecessary to say Darren Cross' s mind was corrupted by Pym Particles. Why add that line in there? Why not have him be a greedy jerk? Obediah Stane and Justin Hammer were sociopaths. There were no scientific expalantion for their evilness. Now let's talk about the hero of the movie, Scott. It seems like Disney wants to turn Scott into Robin Hood to make him likeable. I don't see it being necessary. In real life, criminals can change their ways. If Scott was a selfish thief who changes his thieving ways for his daughter, viewers would still love him.

to:

* It seems unecessary to say Darren Cross' s mind was corrupted by Pym Particles. Why add that line in there? Why not have him be a greedy jerk? Obediah Stane and Justin Hammer were sociopaths. There were no scientific expalantion explantion for their evilness. Now let's talk about the hero of the movie, Scott. It seems like Disney wants to turn Scott into Robin Hood to make him likeable. I don't see it being necessary. In real life, criminals can change their ways. If Scott was a selfish thief who changes his thieving ways for his daughter, viewers would still love him.

Top