Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 2 (click to see context) :
* In comparison to any Spider-Man film before it, this one is particular is filled to the brim with NarmCharm, whereas the previous film only raised the bar a touch. Why is the cheesiness full-frontal, here? Because, aside from the general change in tone, the movie's attempting to cram in far more comic elements in a manner truer to a ''comic book'' than being an artsy adaptation.
Added DiffLines:
*The clock hits 1:21 when [spoiler:Gwen hits the ground dead, Amazing Spider-man 121 is the issue Gwen died in the comics[/spoiler]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spiderman did not kill her; she hit the ground, as he webbed her too late.
Deleted line(s) 8 (click to see context) :
** [[spoiler:The clock tower also made a better setting for giving a reason why Peter had no other options besides using his web to catch Gwen and thus inadvertently killing her than the bridge would have been, better than the original scene in the comics even.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** That ''and'' it was a plot point of the video game that takes place during the movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Irrelevant. Of course it\'s YMMV, this is a YMMV page.
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
* This movie basically does the exact opposite of the Rami trilogy. While in the old films, Peter and Mary Jane try to make their relationship work, but never can. In this film, Peter and Gwen keep trying to break up, for her safety, but they just can't stay apart. And, YMMV, but it comes off as a hell of a lot more adorable.
to:
* This movie basically does the exact opposite of the Rami trilogy. While in the old films, Peter and Mary Jane try to make their relationship work, but never can. In this film, Peter and Gwen keep trying to break up, for her safety, but they just can't stay apart. And, YMMV, but it It comes off as a hell of a lot more adorable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
to:
* If electro is some kind of all-powerful electricity sponge, the consequences would have been far greater than a mere mundane blackout. He should have absorbed the electricity of people's nervous systems as well, killing everyone in the city. [[RealityEnsues That would have been more realistic]]... [[AndThatsTerrible and terrible]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11,12 (click to see context) from:
* This movie basically does the exact opposite of the Rami trilogy. While in the old films, Peter and Mary Jane try to make their relationship work, but never can. In this film, Peter and Gwen keep trying to break up, for her safety, but they just can't stay apart. And it comes off as a hell of a lot more adorable.
** YMMV
** YMMV
to:
* This movie basically does the exact opposite of the Rami trilogy. While in the old films, Peter and Mary Jane try to make their relationship work, but never can. In this film, Peter and Gwen keep trying to break up, for her safety, but they just can't stay apart. And And, YMMV, but it comes off as a hell of a lot more adorable.
** YMMVadorable.
** YMMV
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* In comparison to any Spider-Man film before it, this one is particular is filled to the brim with NarmCharm, whereas the previous film only raised the bar a touch. Why is the cheesiness full-frontal, here? Because, aside from the general change in tone, the movie's attempting to cram in far more comic elements in a manner truer to a comic book than being an artsy adaptation.
to:
* In comparison to any Spider-Man film before it, this one is particular is filled to the brim with NarmCharm, whereas the previous film only raised the bar a touch. Why is the cheesiness full-frontal, here? Because, aside from the general change in tone, the movie's attempting to cram in far more comic elements in a manner truer to a comic book ''comic book'' than being an artsy adaptation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* In comparison to any Spider-Man film before it, this one is particular is filled to the brim with NarmCharm, whereas the previous film only raised the bar a touch. Why is the cheesiness full-frontal, here? Because, aside from the general change in tone, the movie's attempting to cram in far more comic elements in a manner truer to a comic book than being an artsy adaptation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* This movie basically does the exact opposite of the Rami trilogy. While in the old films, Peter and Mary Jane try to make their relationship work, but never can. In this film, Peter and Gwen keep trying to break up, for her safety, but they just can't stay apart. And it comes off as a hell of a lot more adorable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Editing.
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* Peter's phone playing the Spider-Man theme might seem to be LeaningOnTheFourthWall, at first; but, considering what a huge fan base Spidey has In-Universe, it makes sense that somebody would have made the song as a tribute of some sort for him.
to:
* Peter's phone playing the Spider-Man theme might seem to be LeaningOnTheFourthWall, at first; but, considering what a huge fan base Spidey has In-Universe, it makes sense that somebody would have made the song as a tribute of some sort for to him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Adding to \"Fridge Brilliance.\"
Added DiffLines:
* Peter's phone playing the Spider-Man theme might seem to be LeaningOnTheFourthWall, at first; but, considering what a huge fan base Spidey has In-Universe, it makes sense that somebody would have made the song as a tribute of some sort for him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
to:
* Electro playing his own music during the final battle actually does serve a purpose: it demonstrates that he now has complete control over his powers, enough that he feels safe wasting them in some fun ways while toying with a spider.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
to:
** [[spoiler:The clock tower also made a better setting for giving a reason why Peter had no other options besides using his web to catch Gwen and thus inadvertently killing her than the bridge would have been, better than the original scene in the comics even.]]
* Catching Uncle Ben's killer was expected to be resolved in this movie, but the brilliance is it wouldn't have been good if it had. The reason is learning to let go of his petty vendetta and [[ComesGreatResponsibility use his powers responsibly]] was a large part of Peter's character development in the first movie, and having him go back to searching for him would have been a case of AesopAmnesia.
* Catching Uncle Ben's killer was expected to be resolved in this movie, but the brilliance is it wouldn't have been good if it had. The reason is learning to let go of his petty vendetta and [[ComesGreatResponsibility use his powers responsibly]] was a large part of Peter's character development in the first movie, and having him go back to searching for him would have been a case of AesopAmnesia.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
to:
* The Stacy boys have lost their father because of Spider-Man, and now [[spoiler: Gwen has died because of him]]. Supervillains have been born from less.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
to:
* More squick than anything, but Max took clothes from the crematorium because his had turned to ash. Those clothes probably belonged to another body that had been cremated.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
* I wondered why [[spoiler:the location of Gwen's death was moved from the Bridge.]] Then it hit me. It was probably done to avoid being suspiciously similar to [[spoiler:the climax of the first Sam Rami Spider-Man movie which adapted this scene partly. Non-comic fans would probably believe the film was copying that film's climax and this franchise has already been subject to many claims of being a cheap copy of Raimi's films.]]
to:
* I wondered why [[spoiler:the location of Gwen's death was moved from the Bridge.]] Then it hit me. It was probably done to avoid being suspiciously similar to [[spoiler:the climax of the first Sam Rami Raimi Spider-Man movie which adapted this scene partly. Non-comic fans would probably believe the film was copying that film's climax and this franchise has already been subject to many claims of being a cheap copy of Raimi's films.]]
** Not to mention that [[spoiler:Spider-Man saved not only MJ but a whole busload of people in that version of the dropping scene.]] Changes were going to be made.
** Not to mention that [[spoiler:Spider-Man saved not only MJ but a whole busload of people in that version of the dropping scene.]] Changes were going to be made.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
to:
* I wondered why [[spoiler:the location of Gwen's death was moved from the Bridge.]] Then it hit me. It was probably done to avoid being suspiciously similar to [[spoiler:the climax of the first Sam Rami Spider-Man movie which adapted this scene partly. Non-comic fans would probably believe the film was copying that film's climax and this franchise has already been subject to many claims of being a cheap copy of Raimi's films.]]
Changed line(s) 10,11 (click to see context) from:
* [[Headscratchers/TheAmazingSpiderMan2 Here, under Headscratchers]]
* This troper wondered why [[spoiler: the location of Gwen's death was moved from the Bridge.]] Then it hit me. It was probably done to avoid being suspiciously similar to [[spoiler: the climax of the first Sam Rami Spider-Man movie which adapted this scene partly. Non-Comic fans would probably believe the film was copying that films climax and this franchise has already been subject to many claims of being a cheap copy of Rami's films.]]
* This troper wondered why [[spoiler: the location of Gwen's death was moved from the Bridge.]] Then it hit me. It was probably done to avoid being suspiciously similar to [[spoiler: the climax of the first Sam Rami Spider-Man movie which adapted this scene partly. Non-Comic fans would probably believe the film was copying that films climax and this franchise has already been subject to many claims of being a cheap copy of Rami's films.]]
to:
* [[Headscratchers/TheAmazingSpiderMan2 Here, under Headscratchers]]
* This troper wondered why [[spoiler: the location of Gwen's death was moved from the Bridge.]] Then it hit me. It was probably done to avoid being suspiciously similar to [[spoiler: the climax of the first Sam Rami Spider-Man movie which adapted this scene partly. Non-Comic fans would probably believe the film was copying that films climax and this franchise has already been subject to many claims of being a cheap copy of Rami's films.]]Headscratchers]]
* This troper wondered why [[spoiler: the location of Gwen's death was moved from the Bridge.]] Then it hit me. It was probably done to avoid being suspiciously similar to [[spoiler: the climax of the first Sam Rami Spider-Man movie which adapted this scene partly. Non-Comic fans would probably believe the film was copying that films climax and this franchise has already been subject to many claims of being a cheap copy of Rami's films.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
* [[Headscratchers/TheAmazingSpiderMan2 Here, under Headscratchers]]
to:
* [[Headscratchers/TheAmazingSpiderMan2 Here, under Headscratchers]]Headscratchers]]
* This troper wondered why [[spoiler: the location of Gwen's death was moved from the Bridge.]] Then it hit me. It was probably done to avoid being suspiciously similar to [[spoiler: the climax of the first Sam Rami Spider-Man movie which adapted this scene partly. Non-Comic fans would probably believe the film was copying that films climax and this franchise has already been subject to many claims of being a cheap copy of Rami's films.]]
* This troper wondered why [[spoiler: the location of Gwen's death was moved from the Bridge.]] Then it hit me. It was probably done to avoid being suspiciously similar to [[spoiler: the climax of the first Sam Rami Spider-Man movie which adapted this scene partly. Non-Comic fans would probably believe the film was copying that films climax and this franchise has already been subject to many claims of being a cheap copy of Rami's films.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
to:
* When we see the dying NormanOsborn he is so sick that his skin is green and his fingernails are overlong; [[spoiler: when Harry takes the spider venom, his skin turns green and his fingernails start to grow. Its entirely likely that Norman took the serum himself and suffered the consequences.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
to:
** Somewhat confirmed in the tie-in Infinite comic - Gwen is the one who suggests Peter get a new costume, and they begin working on the new design after the original costume is destroyed in battle, with Gwen suggesting the bigger eyes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
to:
* After his incident with the electric eels, Max wakes up in a crematorium. That incident technically killed him. If he hadn't become electricity incarnate...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
That doesn\'t really explain why the design of the costume is so different.
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
** Or it could probably be modified with more durable clothing. After all, if you want to fight crime against people who shoot you or try to kill you, its common sense to have something more durable than spandex.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not Fridge Brilliance - if anything, it\'s Hilarious in Hindsight.
Changed line(s) 4,5 (click to see context) from:
* Continuing the trend of coincidental similarities to TheSpectacularSpiderMan, Creator/PaulGiamatti Alexei Sytsevich a.k.a. Alex O'Hirn, the man who becomes Rhino. On Spectacular, O'Hirn's friend and partner in crime was Flint Marko, a.k.a. Sandman. And who played Sandman in the [[Film/SpiderManTrilogy previous trilogy?]] None other than Thomas Haden Church, Giamatti's co-star and on-screen running buddy in Film/{{Sideways}}.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9 (click to see context) from:
* [[Headscratchers/TheAmazingSpiderMan2 Here]]
to:
* [[Headscratchers/TheAmazingSpiderMan2 Here]]Here, under Headscratchers]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Or it could probably be modified with more durable clothing. After all, if you want to fight crime against people who shoot you or try to kill you, its common sense to have something more durable than spandex.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
* Continuing the trend of coincidental similarities to TheSpectacularSpiderMan,Creator/PaulGiamatti Alexei Sytsevich a.k.a. Alex O'Hirn, the man who becomes Rhino. On Spectacular, O'Hirn's friend and partner in crime was Flint Marko, a.k.a. Sandman. And who played Sandman in the [[Film/SpiderManTrilogy previous trilogy?]] None other than Thomas Haden Church, Giamatti's co-star and on-screen running buddy in Film/{{Sideways}}.
to:
* Continuing the trend of coincidental similarities to TheSpectacularSpiderMan,Creator/PaulGiamatti TheSpectacularSpiderMan, Creator/PaulGiamatti Alexei Sytsevich a.k.a. Alex O'Hirn, the man who becomes Rhino. On Spectacular, O'Hirn's friend and partner in crime was Flint Marko, a.k.a. Sandman. And who played Sandman in the [[Film/SpiderManTrilogy previous trilogy?]] None other than Thomas Haden Church, Giamatti's co-star and on-screen running buddy in Film/{{Sideways}}.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
to:
* Continuing the trend of coincidental similarities to TheSpectacularSpiderMan,Creator/PaulGiamatti Alexei Sytsevich a.k.a. Alex O'Hirn, the man who becomes Rhino. On Spectacular, O'Hirn's friend and partner in crime was Flint Marko, a.k.a. Sandman. And who played Sandman in the [[Film/SpiderManTrilogy previous trilogy?]] None other than Thomas Haden Church, Giamatti's co-star and on-screen running buddy in Film/{{Sideways}}.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
[[AMC:FridgeBrilliance]]
to:
Changed line(s) 4,6 (click to see context) from:
[[AMC:FridgeHorror]]
[[AMC:FridgeLogic]]
[[AMC:FridgeLogic]]
to:
[[AMC:FridgeLogic]]
[[WMG:FridgeLogic]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[AMC:FridgeBrilliance]]
* Why the drastic overhaul of the Spider-Man costume for the sequel? Gwen helped redesign it.
[[AMC:FridgeHorror]]
[[AMC:FridgeLogic]]
* [[Headscratchers/TheAmazingSpiderMan2 Here]]
* Why the drastic overhaul of the Spider-Man costume for the sequel? Gwen helped redesign it.
[[AMC:FridgeHorror]]
[[AMC:FridgeLogic]]
* [[Headscratchers/TheAmazingSpiderMan2 Here]]
