Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* TheDogBitesBack: [[spoiler:The captive villagers are set free by Malik, and the first thing they do is beat Ferreira before drowning him.]]
to:
* TheDogBitesBack: TheDogBitesBack:
** [[spoiler:The captive villagers are set free by Malik, and the first thing they do is beat Ferreira before drowning him.]]
** [[spoiler:After having been captured and raped by Oba Ade as a young woman, Nanisca kills him in the climax.]]
** [[spoiler:The captive villagers are set free by Malik, and the first thing they do is beat Ferreira before drowning him.]]
** [[spoiler:After having been captured and raped by Oba Ade as a young woman, Nanisca kills him in the climax.]]
Changed line(s) 15,18 (click to see context) from:
** The film follows the story of the Dahomey kingdom, who are depicted as heroic for resisting the oppression of the rival Oyo Empire, particularly against the Oyo capturing and enslaving Dahomey citizens to sell to Europeans. The film doesn't ''ignore'' that the Dahomey were prolific slave traders, but it does depict the Agojie as being against the trade (they weren't and were often responsible [[RapePillageAndBurn for the raiding and enslaving themselves]]) and even suggests that they were responsible for ending it (they were actually some of the last holdouts in the trade due to their economic dependence). It further ignores that the Dahomey ''practiced human sacrifice'', although the degree to how bad it was was often extremely exaggerated by anti-abolitionist literature to justify the continuation of slavery.
** The film also depicts the Dahomey as defending themselves against the Oyo Empire's aggression, while in reality the Dahomey were the aggressors by raiding several villages allied to the Oyo, which is what ultimately sparked the war between the two nations. This is partially mitigated in the film by showing the opening raid by the Dahomey provoking the Oyo's plans to attack them eventually.
** Nanisca's suggestion to switch to trading palm oil instead of slaves is portrayed as being motivated by morality, when in actuality, [[PragmaticVillainy this debate only occured in Dahomey because the British were preventing them from selling slaves at the time.]] They quickly went back to slaving after palm oil trading was less lucrative. Not to mention that even during their switch to palm oil production, the people working the plantations were ''still slaves''.
* HistoricalVillainUpgrade: The Oyo Empire is portrayed as slavers and the aggressor in the conflict, when it was actually Dahomey that started the war by raiding Oyo villages and enslaving their allies. The dynamic between the two kingdoms was the complete opposite in reality.
** The film also depicts the Dahomey as defending themselves against the Oyo Empire's aggression, while in reality the Dahomey were the aggressors by raiding several villages allied to the Oyo, which is what ultimately sparked the war between the two nations. This is partially mitigated in the film by showing the opening raid by the Dahomey provoking the Oyo's plans to attack them eventually.
** Nanisca's suggestion to switch to trading palm oil instead of slaves is portrayed as being motivated by morality, when in actuality, [[PragmaticVillainy this debate only occured in Dahomey because the British were preventing them from selling slaves at the time.]] They quickly went back to slaving after palm oil trading was less lucrative. Not to mention that even during their switch to palm oil production, the people working the plantations were ''still slaves''.
* HistoricalVillainUpgrade: The Oyo Empire is portrayed as slavers and the aggressor in the conflict, when it was actually Dahomey that started the war by raiding Oyo villages and enslaving their allies. The dynamic between the two kingdoms was the complete opposite in reality.
to:
** The film follows the story of the Dahomey kingdom, who are depicted as heroic for resisting the oppression of the rival Oyo Empire, particularly against the Oyo capturing and enslaving Dahomey citizens to sell to Europeans. The film doesn't ''ignore'' that the Dahomey were themselves prolific slave traders, but it does depict the Agojie as being against the trade (they weren't and were often responsible [[RapePillageAndBurn for the raiding and enslaving themselves]]) enslaving]]) and even suggests that they were responsible for ending it (they (the Dahomey were actually some of the last holdouts in the trade due to their economic dependence). trade). It further ignores that the Dahomey ''practiced human sacrifice'', although sacrifice'' with their captives. However, [[https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/movies/story/2022-09-28/woman-king-true-story-explained-revisionist-history-debunked the degree to how bad it was was often extremely exaggerated by creators of the movie]] have pushed back against much of this criticism, arguing that many of the available sources about the Dahomey came from anti-abolitionist literature that tried to justify the continuation of slavery.
** The film also depicts the Dahomey as defending themselves against the Oyo Empire's aggression, while in reality the Dahomey were the aggressorsslavery by raiding several villages allied to the Oyo, which is what ultimately sparked the war between the two nations. This is partially mitigated in demonizing Africans, making them no more reputable than the film by showing itself for giving an "accurate" depiction of the opening raid by the Dahomey provoking the Oyo's plans to attack them eventually.
culture.
** Nanisca's suggestion to switch to trading palm oil instead of slaves is portrayed as being motivated bymorality, when in actuality, moral concerns and a recognition of pan-African heritage. In reality, this change was likely more motivated by [[PragmaticVillainy this debate only occured in the slave trade becoming less lucrative]] after British abolition. The Dahomey because the British were preventing them from did not stop selling slaves at the time.]] They quickly went back to slaving after palm oil trading was less lucrative. Not to mention that even during their switch to palm oil production, the people for many years, and those working the palm oil plantations were ''still slaves''.
** While the film doesn't shy away from showing the harshness of the Dahomey's warrior culture, since we see the story from their perspective, the Oyo are made out to be ''much'' more aggressive and malevolent, when in reality the two were both competing with each other for land, tribute, and wealth (often in the form of slaves).
* HistoricalVillainUpgrade:The As noted in HistoricalHeroUpgrade, the Oyo Empire is are portrayed as slavers and the aggressor in the conflict, when it was actually the Dahomey that started also invaded and enslaved the war by raiding Oyo villages and enslaving their allies. The dynamic between the two kingdoms was the complete opposite allies in reality. roughly equal measure.
** The film also depicts the Dahomey as defending themselves against the Oyo Empire's aggression, while in reality the Dahomey were the aggressors
** Nanisca's suggestion to switch to trading palm oil instead of slaves is portrayed as being motivated by
** While the film doesn't shy away from showing the harshness of the Dahomey's warrior culture, since we see the story from their perspective, the Oyo are made out to be ''much'' more aggressive and malevolent, when in reality the two were both competing with each other for land, tribute, and wealth (often in the form of slaves).
* HistoricalVillainUpgrade:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* PoliticallyCorrectHistory: The Agojie are portrayed as being anti-slavery despite the reality being the opposite, and the Dahomey's practices in general are heavily toned down to keep them sympathetic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
to:
* VeryLooselyBasedOnATrueStory: Despite being marketed as "based on ''powerful'' true events", the only things that are historically accurate about the film are the general timeline of the war, the Agojie being female warriors, and the existence of King Ghezo. Everything else, from the depiction of the Dahomey and Oyo to the characters, is a creation of the film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Nanisca (Viola Davis) does not have the relationship with Malik... but also not an example, since these are fictional characters anyway and the movie does establish that Nawi is breaking Agojie rules
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
* ArtisticLicenseHistory: As is par for the course with "BasedOnATrueStory" movies. To name one example not covered by HistoricalHeroUpgrade, Nanisca enters a relationship with [[spoiler:Malik]] that's heavily hinted to be sexual; in real life, the Agojie were required to be celibate as they were ceremonially married to the king.
to:
* ArtisticLicenseHistory: As is par for the course with "BasedOnATrueStory" movies. To name one example not movies; besides the examples covered by HistoricalHeroUpgrade, Nanisca enters a relationship with [[spoiler:Malik]] that's heavily hinted to be sexual; in real life, most of the Agojie were required to be celibate as they were ceremonially married to named characters (besides Ghezo) are fictional, the king.details of the inter-kingdom conflicts are fudged, and the destruction of the port to free enslaved people did not happen as depicted.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* ArtisticLicenseHistory: As is par for the course with "BasedOnATrueStory" movies. To name one example not covered by HistoricalHeroUpgrade, Nanisca enters a relationship with [[spoiler:Malik]] that's heavily hinted to be sexual; in real life, the Agojie were required to be celibate as they were ceremonially married to the king.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* HistoricalVillainDowngrade: The Oyo Empire is portrayed as slavers and the aggressor in the conflict, when it was actually Dahomey that started the war by raiding Oyo villages and enslaving their allies. The dynamic between the two kingdoms was the complete opposite in reality.
to:
* HistoricalVillainDowngrade: HistoricalVillainUpgrade: The Oyo Empire is portrayed as slavers and the aggressor in the conflict, when it was actually Dahomey that started the war by raiding Oyo villages and enslaving their allies. The dynamic between the two kingdoms was the complete opposite in reality.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
** The film also depicts the Dahomey as defending themselves against the Oyo Empire's aggression, while in reality the Dahomey were the aggressors by raiding several villages allied to the Oyo, which is what ultimately sparked the war between the two nations.
to:
** The film also depicts the Dahomey as defending themselves against the Oyo Empire's aggression, while in reality the Dahomey were the aggressors by raiding several villages allied to the Oyo, which is what ultimately sparked the war between the two nations. This is partially mitigated in the film by showing the opening raid by the Dahomey provoking the Oyo's plans to attack them eventually.
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
%%* TheLancer: Izogie and Amenza seem to function as Co-Lancers to Nanisca.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 20,21 (click to see context) from:
* TokenGoodTeammate: Malik is the only white-passing character in the movie who's not onboard with the slave trade. The fact that he's half-Dahomey has something to do with it.
to:
* TokenGoodTeammate: Malik is the only white-passing character in the movie who's not onboard with the slave trade. The fact that he's half-Dahomey has something to do with it.
it. He's also implied to be regularly bullied by Ferreira for being half-black and growing up poor.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
** The film follows the story of the Dahomey kingdom, who are depicted as heroic for resisting the oppression of the rival Oyo Empire, particularly against the Oyo capturing and enslaving Dahomey citizens to sell to Europeans. The film doesn't ''ignore'' that the Dahomey were prolific slave traders, but it does depict the Agojie as being against the trade (they weren't and were often responsible [[RapePillageAndBurn for the raiding and enslaving themselves]]) and even suggests that they were responsible for ending it (they were actually some of the last holdouts in the trade due to their economic dependence). It further ignores that the Dahomey ''practiced human sacrifice''.
to:
** The film follows the story of the Dahomey kingdom, who are depicted as heroic for resisting the oppression of the rival Oyo Empire, particularly against the Oyo capturing and enslaving Dahomey citizens to sell to Europeans. The film doesn't ''ignore'' that the Dahomey were prolific slave traders, but it does depict the Agojie as being against the trade (they weren't and were often responsible [[RapePillageAndBurn for the raiding and enslaving themselves]]) and even suggests that they were responsible for ending it (they were actually some of the last holdouts in the trade due to their economic dependence). It further ignores that the Dahomey ''practiced human sacrifice''.sacrifice'', although the degree to how bad it was was often extremely exaggerated by anti-abolitionist literature to justify the continuation of slavery.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
** The film follows the story of the Dahomey kingdom, who are depicted as heroic for resisting the oppression of the rival Oyo Empire, particularly against the Oyo capturing and enslaving Dahomey citizens to sell to Europeans. The film doesn't ''ignore'' that the Dahomey were prolific slave traders, but it does depict the Agojie as being against the trade (they weren't and were often responsible [[RapePillageAndBurn for the raiding and enslaving themselves]]) and even suggests that they were responsible for ending it (they were actually some of the last holdouts due to their economic dependence). It further ignores that the Dahomey ''practiced human sacrifice''.
to:
** The film follows the story of the Dahomey kingdom, who are depicted as heroic for resisting the oppression of the rival Oyo Empire, particularly against the Oyo capturing and enslaving Dahomey citizens to sell to Europeans. The film doesn't ''ignore'' that the Dahomey were prolific slave traders, but it does depict the Agojie as being against the trade (they weren't and were often responsible [[RapePillageAndBurn for the raiding and enslaving themselves]]) and even suggests that they were responsible for ending it (they were actually some of the last holdouts in the trade due to their economic dependence). It further ignores that the Dahomey ''practiced human sacrifice''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
** The film follows the story of the Dahomey kingdom, who are depicted as heroic for resisting the oppression of the rival Oyo Empire, particularly against the Oyo capturing and enslaving Dahomey citizens to sell to Europeans. The film doesn't ''ignore'' that the Dahomey were prolific slave traders, but it does depict the Agojie as being against the trade (they weren't and were often responsible [[RapePillageAndBurn for the raiding and enslaving themselves]]) and even suggests that they end it themselves. It further ignores that the Dahomey practiced human sacrifice.
to:
** The film follows the story of the Dahomey kingdom, who are depicted as heroic for resisting the oppression of the rival Oyo Empire, particularly against the Oyo capturing and enslaving Dahomey citizens to sell to Europeans. The film doesn't ''ignore'' that the Dahomey were prolific slave traders, but it does depict the Agojie as being against the trade (they weren't and were often responsible [[RapePillageAndBurn for the raiding and enslaving themselves]]) and even suggests that they end were responsible for ending it themselves. (they were actually some of the last holdouts due to their economic dependence). It further ignores that the Dahomey practiced ''practiced human sacrifice.sacrifice''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Consolidating and correcting
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
** The film follows the story of the Dahomey kingdom who are depicted as heroic for resisting the oppression of the rival Oyo Empire, particularly against the Oyo capturing and enslaving Dahomey citizens. However, the film glosses over the fact that historically, the Dahomey were prolific slave traders themselves and regularly practiced human sacrifice.
to:
** The film follows the story of the Dahomey kingdom kingdom, who are depicted as heroic for resisting the oppression of the rival Oyo Empire, particularly against the Oyo capturing and enslaving Dahomey citizens. However, the citizens to sell to Europeans. The film glosses over the fact doesn't ''ignore'' that historically, the Dahomey were prolific slave traders themselves traders, but it does depict the Agojie as being against the trade (they weren't and regularly were often responsible [[RapePillageAndBurn for the raiding and enslaving themselves]]) and even suggests that they end it themselves. It further ignores that the Dahomey practiced human sacrifice.
Changed line(s) 16,18 (click to see context) from:
** The film ignores Dahomey's massive role in the Atlantic Slave Trade, with the only scene discussing it making it seem like it was a one time thing. Dahomey was one of the ''main'' seller of slaves to the Americas, until they were forced to stop by a British blockade in the 1850's.
** Nanisca's suggestion to switch to trading palm oil instead of slaves is portrayed as being motivated by morality, when in actuality, [[PragmaticVillainy this debate only occured in Dahomey because the British were preventing them from selling slaves at the time.]] They quickly went back to slaving after palm oil trading was less lucrative. Not to mention that even during their switch to palm oil production, the people working the plantations were still slaves.
** The Agojie, the army of women led by Nanisca, are portrayed as heroic underdogs fighting ''against slavery''. In reality, the Agojie [[RapePillageAndBurn were mostly used as raiders for Dahomey's slave trade,]] with that role being given to the Oyo Empire raiders on the film instead.
** Nanisca's suggestion to switch to trading palm oil instead of slaves is portrayed as being motivated by morality, when in actuality, [[PragmaticVillainy this debate only occured in Dahomey because the British were preventing them from selling slaves at the time.]] They quickly went back to slaving after palm oil trading was less lucrative. Not to mention that even during their switch to palm oil production, the people working the plantations were still slaves.
** The Agojie, the army of women led by Nanisca, are portrayed as heroic underdogs fighting ''against slavery''. In reality, the Agojie [[RapePillageAndBurn were mostly used as raiders for Dahomey's slave trade,]] with that role being given to the Oyo Empire raiders on the film instead.
to:
** The Agojie, the army of women led by Nanisca, are portrayed as heroic underdogs fighting ''against slavery''. In reality, the Agojie [[RapePillageAndBurn were mostly used as raiders for Dahomey's slave trade,]] with that role being given to the Oyo Empire raiders on the film instead.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
** The Agojie, the army of women led by Nanisca, are portrayed as heroic underdogs fighting ''against slavery''. In reality, the Agojie [[RapePillageAndBurn were mostly used as raiders for Dahomey's slave trade,]] with that role being given to the Oyo Empire raiders instead.
to:
** The Agojie, the army of women led by Nanisca, are portrayed as heroic underdogs fighting ''against slavery''. In reality, the Agojie [[RapePillageAndBurn were mostly used as raiders for Dahomey's slave trade,]] with that role being given to the Oyo Empire raiders on the film instead.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
* The Agojie, the army of women led by Nanisca, [[RapePillageAndBurn were mostly used as raiders for Dahomey's slave trade,]] and not the heroic underdogs they are portrayed as.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
** Nausica's suggestion to switch to trading palm oil instead of slaves is portrayed as being motivated by morality, when in actuality, [[PragmaticVillainy this debate only occured in Dahomey because the British were preventing them from selling slaves at the time.]] They quickly went back to slaving after palm oil trading was less lucrative. Not to mention that even during their switch to palm oil production, the people working the plantations were still slaves.
to:
** Nausica's Nanisca's suggestion to switch to trading palm oil instead of slaves is portrayed as being motivated by morality, when in actuality, [[PragmaticVillainy this debate only occured in Dahomey because the British were preventing them from selling slaves at the time.]] They quickly went back to slaving after palm oil trading was less lucrative. Not to mention that even during their switch to palm oil production, the people working the plantations were still slaves.slaves.
* The Agojie, the army of women led by Nanisca, [[RapePillageAndBurn were mostly used as raiders for Dahomey's slave trade,]] and not the heroic underdogs they are portrayed as.
* The Agojie, the army of women led by Nanisca, [[RapePillageAndBurn were mostly used as raiders for Dahomey's slave trade,]] and not the heroic underdogs they are portrayed as.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
** Nausica's suggestion to switch to trading palm oil instead of slaves is portrayed as being motivated by morality, when in actuality, [[PragmaticVillainy this debate only occured in Dahomey because the British were preventing them from selling slaves at the time.]] They quickly went back to slaving after palm oil trading was less lucrative.
to:
** Nausica's suggestion to switch to trading palm oil instead of slaves is portrayed as being motivated by morality, when in actuality, [[PragmaticVillainy this debate only occured in Dahomey because the British were preventing them from selling slaves at the time.]] They quickly went back to slaving after palm oil trading was less lucrative. Not to mention that even during their switch to palm oil production, the people working the plantations were still slaves.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
** Nausica's suggestion to switch to trading palm oil instead of slaves is portrayed as being motivated by morality, when in actuality, [[PragmaticVillainy this debate only occured in Dahomey because the British were preventing them from selling slaves at the time.]]
to:
** Nausica's suggestion to switch to trading palm oil instead of slaves is portrayed as being motivated by morality, when in actuality, [[PragmaticVillainy this debate only occured in Dahomey because the British were preventing them from selling slaves at the time.]]]] They quickly went back to slaving after palm oil trading was less lucrative.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
** HistoricalVillainDowngrade: The Oyo Empire is portrayed as slavers and the aggressor in the conflict, when it was actually Dahomey that started the war by raiding Oyo villages and enslaving their allies. The dynamic between the two kingdoms was the complete opposite in reality.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** The film ignores Dahomey's massive role in the Atlantic Slave Trade, with the only scene discussing it making it seem like it was a one time thing. Dahomey was one of the ''main'' seller of slaves to the Americas, until they were forced to stop by a British blockade in the 1850's.
** Nausica's suggestion to switch to trading palm oil instead of slaves is portrayed as being motivated by morality, when in actuality, [[PragmaticVillainy this debate only occured in Dahomey because the British were preventing them from selling slaves at the time.]]
** HistoricalVillainDowngrade: The Oyo Empire is portrayed as slavers and the aggressor in the conflict, when it was actually Dahomey that started the war by raiding Oyo villages and enslaving their allies. The dynamic between the two kingdoms was the complete opposite in reality.
** Nausica's suggestion to switch to trading palm oil instead of slaves is portrayed as being motivated by morality, when in actuality, [[PragmaticVillainy this debate only occured in Dahomey because the British were preventing them from selling slaves at the time.]]
** HistoricalVillainDowngrade: The Oyo Empire is portrayed as slavers and the aggressor in the conflict, when it was actually Dahomey that started the war by raiding Oyo villages and enslaving their allies. The dynamic between the two kingdoms was the complete opposite in reality.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* HistoricalHeroUpgrade: The film follows the story of the Dahomey kingdom who are depicted as heroic for resisting the oppression of the rival Oyo Empire, particularly against the Oyo capturing and enslaving Dahomey citizens. However, the film glosses over the fact that historically, the Dahomey were prolific slave traders themselves and regularly practiced human sacrifice.
to:
* HistoricalHeroUpgrade: HistoricalHeroUpgrade:
** The film follows the story of the Dahomey kingdom who are depicted as heroic for resisting the oppression of the rival Oyo Empire, particularly against the Oyo capturing and enslaving Dahomey citizens. However, the film glosses over the fact that historically, the Dahomey were prolific slave traders themselves and regularly practiced humansacrifice.sacrifice.
** The film also depicts the Dahomey as defending themselves against the Oyo Empire's aggression, while in reality the Dahomey were the aggressors by raiding several villages allied to the Oyo, which is what ultimately sparked the war between the two nations.
** The film follows the story of the Dahomey kingdom who are depicted as heroic for resisting the oppression of the rival Oyo Empire, particularly against the Oyo capturing and enslaving Dahomey citizens. However, the film glosses over the fact that historically, the Dahomey were prolific slave traders themselves and regularly practiced human
** The film also depicts the Dahomey as defending themselves against the Oyo Empire's aggression, while in reality the Dahomey were the aggressors by raiding several villages allied to the Oyo, which is what ultimately sparked the war between the two nations.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* HistoricalHeroUpgrade: The film follows the story of the Dahomey kingdom who are depicted as heroic for resisting the oppression of the rival Oyo Empire, particularly against the Oyo capturing and enslaving Dahomey citizens. However, the film glosses over the fact that historically, the Dahomey were prolific slave traders themselves and regularly practiced human sacrifice.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
The film is about the Agojie, the female warriors of the Dahomey kingdom led by General Nanisca (Davis). As they train a new set of young warriors, they face a threat against their enemies, the Oyo Empire, along with European slave traders.
to:
The film is about the Agojie, the female warriors of the Dahomey UsefulNotes/{{Dahomey}} kingdom led by General Nanisca (Davis). As they train a new set of young warriors, they face a threat against their enemies, the Oyo Empire, along with European slave traders.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
%%* BigBad: General Oba Ade, leader of the Oyo Empire.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
ZCE
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
* BigBad: General Oba Ade, leader of the Oyo Empire.
to:
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* TheLancer: Izogie and Amenza seem to function as Co-Lancers to Nanisca.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
----
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
* TokenGoodTeammate: Malik is the only white-passing character in the movie who's not onboard with the slave trade.
to:
* TokenGoodTeammate: Malik is the only white-passing character in the movie who's not onboard with the slave trade. The fact that he's half-Dahomey has something to do with it.
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* TheLancer: Izogie and Amenza seem to function as Co-Lancers to Nanisca.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
* LukeIAmYourFather: [[spoiler:Nanisca reveals to Nawi that she is her mother.]]
to:
* LukeIAmYourFather: [[spoiler:Nanisca reveals to Nawi that she is her mother.]]]]
* TokenGoodTeammate: Malik is the only white-passing character in the movie who's not onboard with the slave trade.
* TokenGoodTeammate: Malik is the only white-passing character in the movie who's not onboard with the slave trade.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[quoteright:350:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/35dfa8f5_975b_4572_93c0_5d563470ca36.jpeg]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
''The Woman King'' is a 2022 historical epic film from writer Dana Stevens and director Gina Prince-Blythewood. It stars Creator/ViolaDavis, Thuso Mbedo, Lashana Lynch, Sheila Atim, and Creator/JohnBoyega, and was released on September 16th, 2022.
to:
''The Woman King'' is a 2022 historical epic film from writer Dana Stevens and director Gina Prince-Blythewood.Creator/GinaPrinceBlythewood. It stars Creator/ViolaDavis, Thuso Mbedo, Lashana Lynch, Sheila Atim, and Creator/JohnBoyega, and was released on September 16th, 2022.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
''The Woman King'' is a 2022 historical epic film from writer Dana Stevens and director Gina Prince-Blythewood. It stars Creator/ViolaDavis, Thuso Mbedo, Lashana Lynch, Sheila Atim, and Creator/JohnBoyega, and was released on September 16th, 2022.
The film is about the Agojie, the female warriors of the Dahomey kingdom led by General Nanisca (Davis). As they train a new set of young warriors, they face a threat against their enemies, the Oyo Empire, along with European slave traders.
!!The film provides examples of:
* BigBad: General Oba Ade, leader of the Oyo Empire.
* ChildByRape: [[spoiler:Nawi is Nanisca's daughter, as she was repeatedly raped by Oba Ade and gave her up to protect her.]]
* TheDogBitesBack: [[spoiler:The captive villagers are set free by Malik, and the first thing they do is beat Ferreira before drowning him.]]
* LukeIAmYourFather: [[spoiler:Nanisca reveals to Nawi that she is her mother.]]
The film is about the Agojie, the female warriors of the Dahomey kingdom led by General Nanisca (Davis). As they train a new set of young warriors, they face a threat against their enemies, the Oyo Empire, along with European slave traders.
!!The film provides examples of:
* BigBad: General Oba Ade, leader of the Oyo Empire.
* ChildByRape: [[spoiler:Nawi is Nanisca's daughter, as she was repeatedly raped by Oba Ade and gave her up to protect her.]]
* TheDogBitesBack: [[spoiler:The captive villagers are set free by Malik, and the first thing they do is beat Ferreira before drowning him.]]
* LukeIAmYourFather: [[spoiler:Nanisca reveals to Nawi that she is her mother.]]