Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Film / Oppenheimer

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator/HarryGroener: Senator Gale [=McGee=].

to:

* Creator/HarryGroener: Creator/HarryGroener as Senator Gale [=McGee=].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator/HarryGroener: Senator [=McGee=].
* Creator/GregoryJbara as Chairman Magnuson.

to:

* Creator/HarryGroener: Senator Gale [=McGee=].
* Creator/GregoryJbara as Chairman Senator Warren Magnuson.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AsYouKnow: [[Spoiler: When Strauss reveals to Oppenheimer that Karl Fuchs was a spy at Los Alamos, Strauss over-explains that Fuchs was the British scientist hired by Oppenheimer, complete with a flashback cutaway, to remind the audience who Fuchs was.]]

to:

* AsYouKnow: [[Spoiler: When [[spoiler:When Strauss reveals to Oppenheimer that Karl Fuchs was a spy at Los Alamos, Strauss over-explains that Fuchs was the British scientist hired by Oppenheimer, complete with a flashback cutaway, to remind the audience who Fuchs was.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The movie places plenty of emphasis on the collaborative nature of the Manhattan Project and of science in general. It never tries to make the case that Oppenheimer was the only one who could have led it to completion. As for how he ended up in that position, it is not a straightforward logical case of him being the best person for the job, but coincidence and subjective personal likings by those making the decision are shown to also play their parts.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)

Added DiffLines:

** Note the decision to drop the bomb on Hiroshima was ultimately determined to be a practical decision. Military leaders decided that they had four options:
1.) drop it on an uninhabited island off the coast of Japan. 2.) Bring Japanese military leaders to a remote site and detonate it under the threat that it will be used if they do not surrender. 3.) Give advanced warning so a city can be evacuated and then drop it. 4.) Drop it on the city like they ended up doing.
The first option was determined to be impractical since the message would not get to enough people and they feared it could cause a tsunami that would end up doing more damage. The second and third options were considered a bad idea since there was no guarantee the bomb was going to work again. In fact the gun barrel device, "Little Boy", had not even been tested yet. So if they were trying to use it as an intimidation demonstration and it didn't work it would've been extremely embarrassing and likely would have strengthened the Japanese resolve.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)

Added DiffLines:

** one of the most amazing things in real life is that even though tens of thousands of people were working on the project, only a few dozen knew what it was actually for.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UnknownRival: [[spoiler:Oppenheimer appears to have no idea that Strauss was the one who engineered his downfall. Later scenes indicate he is aware the entire thing is a setup, but he still goes through with it anyway.]]

to:

* UnknownRival: [[spoiler:Oppenheimer appears to have no idea that Strauss was the one who engineered his downfall.downfall, nor is it likely he even remembers the testimony that soured Strauss's opinion of him. Later scenes indicate he is aware the entire thing is a setup, but he still goes through with it anyway.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The Iconic Item of Richard Feynman


* IconicItem: Oppenheimer's porkpie hat and pipe are both prominently featured in a scene after Los Alamos is set up, as though reminding audiences that this is where the man stepped into legend.

to:

* IconicItem: Oppenheimer's porkpie hat and pipe are both prominently featured in a scene after Los Alamos is set up, as though reminding audiences that this is where the man stepped into legend. Also, young Richard Feynman is shown playing his famous bongos.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenseHistory: For the most part, ''Oppenheimer'' [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oppenheimer_(film)#Accuracy_and_omissions maintained a keen eye towards historical accuracy]], with very few actual ''mistakes'' in portraying events as documented. Nevertheless, artistic license was still exercised for the sake of the narrative, either by adding small embellishments for dramatic effect, compositing certain historical events to make the storytelling flow more efficiently and/or to avoid confusing audiences who may be unaware of the context.

to:

* ArtisticLicenseHistory: For the most part, ''Oppenheimer'' [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oppenheimer_(film)#Accuracy_and_omissions maintained a keen eye towards historical accuracy]], with very few actual ''mistakes'' in portraying events as documented. Nevertheless, artistic license was still exercised for the sake of the narrative, either by adding small embellishments for dramatic effect, or compositing certain historical events to make the storytelling flow more efficiently and/or to avoid confusing audiences who may be unaware of the context.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenseHistory: For the most part, ''Oppenheimer'' [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oppenheimer_(film)#Accuracy_and_omissions maintained a keen eye towards historical accuracy]], with very few actual ''mistakes'' in portraying events as documented. Nevertheless, artistic license was still exercised for the sake of the narrative, either by adding small embellishments for dramatic effect, or compositing certain historical events to make the storytelling flow more efficiently.

to:

* ArtisticLicenseHistory: For the most part, ''Oppenheimer'' [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oppenheimer_(film)#Accuracy_and_omissions maintained a keen eye towards historical accuracy]], with very few actual ''mistakes'' in portraying events as documented. Nevertheless, artistic license was still exercised for the sake of the narrative, either by adding small embellishments for dramatic effect, or compositing certain historical events to make the storytelling flow more efficiently.efficiently and/or to avoid confusing audiences who may be unaware of the context.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No need to list "aversions", it either has it or it doesn't.


* ArtisticLicenseHistory: Largely averted. Uncommon for a major Hollywood film, ''Oppenheimer'' [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oppenheimer_(film)#Accuracy_and_omissions has been noted for its historical accuracy]]. Nonetheless, there are points in the film where this trope still applies:

to:

* ArtisticLicenseHistory: Largely averted. Uncommon for a major Hollywood film, For the most part, ''Oppenheimer'' [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oppenheimer_(film)#Accuracy_and_omissions has been noted for its maintained a keen eye towards historical accuracy]]. Nonetheless, there are points accuracy]], with very few actual ''mistakes'' in the film where this trope portraying events as documented. Nevertheless, artistic license was still applies:exercised for the sake of the narrative, either by adding small embellishments for dramatic effect, or compositing certain historical events to make the storytelling flow more efficiently.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AsYouKnow: [[Spoiler: When Strauss reveals to Oppenheimer that Karl Fuchs was a spy at Los Alamos, Strauss over-explains that Fuchs was the British scientist hired by Oppenheimer, complete with a flashback cutaway, to remind the audience who Fuchs was.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HumiliationConga: [[spoiler:Strauss gets it handed to him starting with when Hill testifies he arranged for Oppenheimer to be faced with the committee so his security clearance would be revoked, his angry rant about how Einstein and every scientist was out to get him because Oppenheimer told them to--which he didn't, getting word that three negative Senate votes resulted in his being rejected from the seat and now the end of his political career--which means Strauss now has to go out to the press and put a smile on his face about it like nothing's wrong too.]]

Added: 391

Changed: 341

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** By all accounts, Oppenheimer was not present at the meeting where Kyoto was excluded; according to Leslie Groves, the only people in the room were himself, Secretary Stimson, and General George Marshall.



* HistoricalDomainCharacter: Practically every character is a real historical figure, even relatively minor scientists and politicians. The only exception is the unnamed senate aide played by Alden Ehrenreich.

to:

* HistoricalDomainCharacter: Practically every character is a real historical figure, even relatively minor scientists and politicians. The only exception is exceptions are the unnamed senate aide played by Alden Ehrenreich.Ehrenreich, and the Army Air Force officer in the target meeting (played by Jeremy John Wells) who is concerned about the effect the atomic detonation will have on a B-29. Given that he mentions he will be flying the plane dropping the bomb, the only conclusion is that he's meant to be Colonel Paul Tibbets, who commanded the Hiroshima mission.


Added DiffLines:

* UnknownCharacter: The single Naval officer in the target meeting is probably meant to be Captain William Parsons, an ordnance expert and Oppenheimer's second in command at Los Alamos.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** US Secretary of War Stimson recommending they do not bomb Kyoto due to the cultural significance and vacationing there with his wife — the latter is a persistent urban legend that in the film helps sell the cold-blooded horror of what the U.S. is planning. Stimson in reality actually lobbied to spare the city completely for respectful reasons, knowing how culturally significant it was the Japanese and having visited the city several times as Governor of the Philippines. There's no account of him honeymooning with his wife there, either.

to:

** US Secretary of War Stimson recommending they do not bomb Kyoto due to the cultural significance and vacationing there with his wife — the latter is a persistent urban legend that in the film helps sell the cold-blooded horror of what the U.S. is planning. Stimson in reality actually lobbied to spare the city completely for respectful reasons, knowing how culturally significant it was to the Japanese and having visited the city several times as Governor of the Philippines.Philippines (it would be the equivalent of destroying Vatican City and expecting the Catholics to surrender). There's no account of him honeymooning with his wife there, either.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Creator/DylanArnold as Frank Oppenheimer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moved from the Trivia page.

Added DiffLines:

* CastingGag:
** Creator/EmilyBlunt [[Anime/TheWindRises once again]] plays the wife of a man who invents one of World War II's most infamous weapons.
** Christopher Denham plays Klaus Fuchs in this film, after playing the fictional Jim Meeks in ''Series/{{Manhattan}}''. [[spoiler:Both characters are eventually revealed to be spying for the Soviets.]]
** Creator/JoshHartnett's role as Ernest Lawrence, given the last time Hartnett was in a three-hour historical epic, it was "Film/PearlHarbor". He got to play a role in a film about the beginning of the war around twenty years later was in a film about the end of it. Ironically, the role Hartnett played in Pearl Harbor was supposed to be played by Creator/MattDamon, but he was unavailable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Oppenheimer is also fairly understanding of a fellow Jewish leftist graduate student hesitant to join the Manhattan Project, asking Groves if he can speak to this "fellow traveler" alone. Admitting to being a "fellow traveler" was risky in this antisemitic, anti-communist time, so Oppie was taking a risk relating to the student.

to:

** Oppenheimer is also fairly understanding of a fellow Jewish leftist graduate student hesitant to join the Manhattan Project, asking Groves if he can speak to this "fellow traveler" alone. Admitting to being a "fellow traveler" was risky in this antisemitic, anti-communist time, so Oppie Oppenheimer was taking a risk relating to the student.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BittersweetEnding: [[spoiler:With emphasis on the "bitter" part. [[ForegoneConclusion World War II ends]] without the Axis getting the bomb or the Allies having to launch the extremely mutually costly invasion of Japan, but only after strategic bombing (including the atomic bombs) that kill hundreds of thousands of people, and the atomic weapons program has given birth to UsefulNotes/TheColdWar with the USSR and the consequent nuclear arms race. Oppenheimer is eventually deemed to be a loyal citizen to the United States instead of a threat, thus vindicating his personal reputation; but in the interim and because of Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and the consequences that he was not aware his creation would have, he loses his security clearance and by extension his qualifications as an atomic energy expert, effectively ending his career with the United States government. His mistress killed herself and his relationship with his wife is also possibly strained as a result of the trial and interrogations over her ties to the Communist party of America, though the last scene of them together has them walking home with their hands intertwined, showing that their love remains strong.[[note]]And indeed, Robert and Kitty would remain closely married until Robert's death in 1967; when Kitty died in 1972, her ashes were scattered [[TogetherInDeath in the same place Robert's ashes had been scattered]].[[/note]] And most importantly, he is going to have to live with the fact that he created something that could, in the wrong hands, potentially ''destroy the world'', and that more atrocities can, and will, happen as result of the atomic bomb. On the bright side, the role Strauss played in Oppenheimer's downfall is exposed in the middle of his confirmation hearing to the Cabinet, torpedoing his chances and leading to a rehabilitation of Oppenheimer's reputation. And as of this writing, the world has not yet been destroyed by nuclear power, even if it's because of the threat of Mutually-Assured Destruction.]]

to:

* BittersweetEnding: [[spoiler:With emphasis on the "bitter" part. [[ForegoneConclusion World War II ends]] without the Axis getting the bomb or the Allies having to launch the extremely mutually costly invasion of Japan, but only after strategic bombing (including the atomic bombs) that kill hundreds of thousands of people, and the atomic weapons program has given birth to UsefulNotes/TheColdWar with the USSR and the consequent nuclear arms race. Oppenheimer is eventually deemed to be a loyal citizen to the United States instead of a threat, thus vindicating his personal reputation; but in the interim and because of Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and the consequences that he was not aware his creation would have, he loses his security clearance and by extension his qualifications as an atomic energy expert, effectively ending his career with the United States government. His mistress killed herself and his relationship with his wife is also possibly strained as a result of the trial security hearing and interrogations over her ties to the Communist party of America, though the last scene of them together has them walking home with their hands intertwined, showing that their love remains strong.[[note]]And indeed, Robert and Kitty would remain closely married until Robert's death in 1967; when Kitty died in 1972, her ashes were scattered [[TogetherInDeath in the same place Robert's ashes had been scattered]].[[/note]] And most importantly, he is going to have to live with the fact that he created something that could, in the wrong hands, potentially ''destroy the world'', and that more atrocities can, and will, happen as result of the atomic bomb. On the bright side, the role Strauss played in Oppenheimer's downfall is exposed in the middle of his confirmation hearing to the Cabinet, torpedoing his chances and leading to a rehabilitation of Oppenheimer's reputation. And as of this writing, the world has not yet been destroyed by nuclear power, even if it's because of the threat of Mutually-Assured Destruction.]]



* PrecisionFStrike: Kitty Oppenheimer gets the most effective F-Bomb when she curses Robert out during the trial: [[spoiler:"You shook his FUCKING hand?!"]]

to:

* PrecisionFStrike: Kitty Oppenheimer gets the most effective F-Bomb when she curses Robert out during the trial: security hearing: [[spoiler:"You shook his FUCKING hand?!"]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


** It is not pointed out, but while Oppenheimer is known as a strict teacher, he is not a bigot and accepts women and students of all races into his classes. At one point, he gets annoyed at Lawrence for not supporting desegregation as passionately as Robert thinks he should. He also pretty quickly accepts Lilli Hornig into the Manhattan Project, despite initially mistaking her for a secretary. He may be a chauvinist towards the women he dates and is far from an ideal husband or boyfriend, but when it comes to science, he cares more about results than the identity of the scientist. That being said, he is still very much a PoliticallyIncorrectHero despite arguably being [[FairForItsDay comparatively open-minded]] for a white man at his time.

to:

** It is not pointed out, but while Oppenheimer is known as a strict teacher, he is not a bigot and accepts women and students of all races into his classes. At one point, he gets annoyed at Lawrence for not supporting desegregation as passionately as Robert thinks he should. He also pretty quickly accepts Lilli Hornig into the Manhattan Project, despite initially mistaking her for a secretary. He may be a chauvinist towards the women he dates and is far from an ideal husband or boyfriend, but when it comes to science, he cares more about results than the identity of the scientist. That being said, he is still very much a PoliticallyIncorrectHero despite arguably being [[FairForItsDay comparatively open-minded]] open-minded for a white man at his time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*BatteredBouquet: Oppenheimer's mistress Jean asks him to stop giving her flowers after their meeting at a party, and immediately bins them. It becomes part of their trysts; he gives her flowers, she chucks them, and they get down to business.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BeCarefulWhatYouWishFor: One of the main lessons of the movie. Oppenheimer hoped that the atom bomb would be so terrifying that it would make war unthinkable. To his horror, American officials decide they want more bombs, beginning the nuclear arms race and the policy of MutuallyAssuredDestruction that leads to the decline of ''conventional'' war -- but in the worst possible way.


Added DiffLines:

* GoneHorriblyRight: Oppenheimer believed that the creation of the atom bomb would be devising a weapon so lethal and horrifying that it would create a permanent peace by stopping all future wars. He got what he wanted but not ''how'' he wanted it by virtue of unwittingly causing the nuclear arms race which in turn would lead to the policy of MutuallyAssuredDestruction.

Top