Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Film / FlashOfGenius

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenseHistory: Kearns did not represent himself in his suit against Ford, nor were any damages awarded; Ford made an undisclosed offer believed to be around $10 million, which Kearns accepted.

to:

* ArtisticLicenseHistory: Kearns did not represent himself in his suit against Ford, nor were any damages awarded; Ford made an undisclosed offer believed to be around $10 million, which Kearns accepted. However, Kearns ''did'' represent himself against Chrysler.



* BlatantLies: Everything Ford executives say about Robert Kearns not being the inventor of the intermittent wiper is considered this.
* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represented himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson (Creator/AlanAlda), withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw, and Kearns was in fact represented by a whole team of lawyers, and actually got a settlement from Ford. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, receiving $18.7 million in damages. It's possible this was done so as to have a scene where Kearns examines himself in homage to an episode of ''WesternAnimation/KingOfTheHill''.

to:

* BlatantLies: Everything Since we know he's the true inventor of the wiper, everything Ford executives say about Robert Kearns not being the inventor of and the intermittent wiper reason they backed out of their deal is considered this.
* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represented himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson (Creator/AlanAlda), withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw, and Kearns was in fact represented by a whole team of lawyers, and actually got the $10.1 million as a settlement from Ford. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, receiving $18.7 million in damages. It's possible this was done so as to have a scene where Kearns examines himself in homage to an episode of ''WesternAnimation/KingOfTheHill''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Determinator: Kearns tried for over a ''decade'' to get Ford in court after being obsessed with proving them Ford.

to:

* Determinator: {{Determinator}}: Kearns tried for over a ''decade'' to get Ford in court after being obsessed with proving them Ford.

Added: 690

Changed: 713

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AdaptationExplanationExtrication: Kearns is awarded $10.1 million in damages against Ford in 1980. The epilogue reveals he sued Chrysler in 1992 and was awarded $18.7 million. Why Chrysler paid more is never explained. Kearns actually took an undisclosed out-of-court settlement believed to be around $10 million in the suit against Ford, while Chrysler lost and was ordered to pay damages, hence the higher amount. Also not mentioned is General Motors, who was imune from lawsuit because they designed their own intermittent wiper that did not infringe on Kearns' patents.

to:

* AdaptationExplanationExtrication: Kearns is awarded [[spoiler: $10.1 million in damages against Ford in 1980. 1980]]. The epilogue reveals [[spoiler: he sued Chrysler in 1992 and was awarded $18.7 million.million]]. Why Chrysler paid more is never explained. Kearns actually took an undisclosed out-of-court settlement believed to be around $10 million in the suit against Ford, while Chrysler lost and was ordered to pay damages, hence the higher amount. Also not mentioned is General Motors, who was imune from lawsuit because they designed their own intermittent wiper that did not infringe on Kearns' patents.



* BittersweetEnding: Kearns wins and Ford must admit they stole his design, but his family leaves him long before the trial.
* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represents himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson (Creator/AlanAlda), withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw, and Kearns was in fact represented by a team of lawyers, and actually settled with Ford for the $10 million. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, receiving $18.7 million in damages. It's possible this was done so as to have a scene where Kearns examines himself in homage to an episode of ''WesternAnimation/KingOfTheHill''.

to:

* BittersweetEnding: Kearns wins and Ford must admit his lawsuit against Ford, the jury awarded him $10.1 million believing they stole his design, but came his family leaves him long before him.
* BlatantLies: Everything Ford executives say about Robert Kearns not being
the trial.
inventor of the intermittent wiper is considered this.
* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represents represented himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson (Creator/AlanAlda), withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw, and Kearns was in fact represented by a whole team of lawyers, and actually settled with Ford for the $10 million.got a settlement from Ford. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, receiving $18.7 million in damages. It's possible this was done so as to have a scene where Kearns examines himself in homage to an episode of ''WesternAnimation/KingOfTheHill''.''WesternAnimation/KingOfTheHill''.
* Determinator: Kearns tried for over a ''decade'' to get Ford in court after being obsessed with proving them Ford.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HowWeGotHere: The movie begins in 1963 with Robert Kearns on a Greyhound bus. The movie flashes back three years earlier on the night he comes up with the idea of the intermittent wiper. It is later revealed that he's on a HeroicBSOD from Ford stealing his invention on his way to Washington D.C.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''''Flash of Genius''''' (2008) is the story of Robert Kearns (Creator/GregKinnear), who develops and patents the intermittent windshield wiper. When he displays it to Ford Motor Company executives, he makes a deal to manufacture it himself and sell it to them.

to:

'''''Flash ''Flash of Genius''''' Genius'' (2008) is the story of Robert Kearns (Creator/GregKinnear), who develops and patents the intermittent windshield wiper. When he displays it to Ford Motor Company executives, he makes a deal to manufacture it himself and sell it to them.

Added: 667

Removed: 578

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[quoteright:240:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/flash_of_genius_post.jpg]]



* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represents himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson (Creator/AlanAlda), withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw, and Kearns was in fact represented by a team of lawyers, and actually settled with Ford for the $10 million. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, receiving $18.7 million in damages. It's possible this was done so as to have a scene where Kearns examines himself in homage to an episode of ''WesternAnimation/KingOfTheHill''.


Added DiffLines:

* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represents himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson (Creator/AlanAlda), withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw, and Kearns was in fact represented by a team of lawyers, and actually settled with Ford for the $10 million. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, receiving $18.7 million in damages. It's possible this was done so as to have a scene where Kearns examines himself in homage to an episode of ''WesternAnimation/KingOfTheHill''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

----

Added: 575

Changed: 8

Removed: 575

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AdaptationExplanationExtrication: Kearns is awarded $10.1 million in damages against Ford in 1980. The epilogue reveals he sued Chrysler in 1992 and was awarded $18.7 million. Why Chrysler paid more is never explained. Kearns actually took an undisclosed out-of-court settlement believed to be around $10 million in the suit against Ford, while Chrysler lost and was ordered to pay damages, hence the higher amount. Also not mentioned is General Motors, who was imune from lawsuit because they designed their own intermittent wiper that did not infringe on Kearns' patents.



* AdaptationExplanationExtrication: Kearns is awarded $10.1 million in damages against Ford in 1980. The epilogue reveals he sued Chrysler in 1992 and was awarded $18.7 million. Why Chrysler paid more is never explained. Kearns actually took an undisclosed out-of-court settlement believed to be around $10 million in the suit against Ford, while Chrysler lost and was ordered to pay damages, hence the higher amount. Also not mentioned is General Motors, who was imune from lawsuit because they designed their own intermittent wiper that did not infringe on Kearns' patents.



* WhereAreTheyNow: The closing credits mention that Kearns was awarded $18.7 million in a lawsuit against Chrysler Corp. in 1992, and that he died in 2005.

to:

* WhereAreTheyNow: WhereAreTheyNowEpilogue: The closing credits mention that Kearns was awarded $18.7 million in a lawsuit against Chrysler Corp. in 1992, and that he died in 2005.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AdaptationExplanationExtrication: Kearns is awarded $10.1 million in damages against Ford in 1980. The epilogue reveals he sued Chrysler in 1992 and was awarded $18.7 million. Why Chrysler paid more is never explained. Kearns actually took an undisclosed out-of-court settlement believed to be around $10 million in the suit against Ford, while Chrysler lost and was ordered to pay damages, hence the higher amount. Also not mentioned is General Motors, who couldn't be sued because they designed their own intermittent wiper that did not infringe on Kearns' patents.

to:

* AdaptationExplanationExtrication: Kearns is awarded $10.1 million in damages against Ford in 1980. The epilogue reveals he sued Chrysler in 1992 and was awarded $18.7 million. Why Chrysler paid more is never explained. Kearns actually took an undisclosed out-of-court settlement believed to be around $10 million in the suit against Ford, while Chrysler lost and was ordered to pay damages, hence the higher amount. Also not mentioned is General Motors, who couldn't be sued was imune from lawsuit because they designed their own intermittent wiper that did not infringe on Kearns' patents.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AdaptationExplanationExtrication: Kearns is awarded $10.1 million in damages against Ford in 1980. The epilogue reveals he sued Chrysler in 1992 and was awarded $18.7 million. Why Chrysler paid more is never explained. Kearns actually took an undisclosed out-of-court settlement believed to be around $10 million in the suit against Ford, while Chrysler lost and was ordered to pay damages, hence the higher amount. Also not mentioned is General Motors, who couldn't be sued because they designed their own intermittent wiper that did not infringe on Kearns' patents).

to:

* AdaptationExplanationExtrication: Kearns is awarded $10.1 million in damages against Ford in 1980. The epilogue reveals he sued Chrysler in 1992 and was awarded $18.7 million. Why Chrysler paid more is never explained. Kearns actually took an undisclosed out-of-court settlement believed to be around $10 million in the suit against Ford, while Chrysler lost and was ordered to pay damages, hence the higher amount. Also not mentioned is General Motors, who couldn't be sued because they designed their own intermittent wiper that did not infringe on Kearns' patents).patents.

Added: 207

Changed: 969

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represents himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson (Creator/AlanAlda), withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw, and Kearns was in fact represented by a team of lawyers, and actually settled with Ford for the $10 million. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, winning $18.7 million.[[note]] It's not entirely clear why Chrysler paid almost double what Ford did, but one theory is that because they bought up American Motors in 1987, they took responsibility for any infringment on AMC's part, another is that they infringed his patent longer than Ford. His case against Ford also set a precedent, making his suit against Chrysler far simpler. General Motors, however, did not get sued because they designed their own intermittent windshield wiper which did not infringe on Kearns' patent.[[/note]] It's possible this was done so as to have a scene where Kearns examines himself in homage to an episode of ''WesternAnimation/KingOfTheHill''.

to:

* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represents himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson (Creator/AlanAlda), withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw, and Kearns was in fact represented by a team of lawyers, and actually settled with Ford for the $10 million. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, winning receiving $18.7 million.[[note]] It's not entirely clear why Chrysler paid almost double what Ford did, but one theory is that because they bought up American Motors million in 1987, they took responsibility for any infringment on AMC's part, another is that they infringed his patent longer than Ford. His case against Ford also set a precedent, making his suit against Chrysler far simpler. General Motors, however, did not get sued because they designed their own intermittent windshield wiper which did not infringe on Kearns' patent.[[/note]] damages. It's possible this was done so as to have a scene where Kearns examines himself in homage to an episode of ''WesternAnimation/KingOfTheHill''.''WesternAnimation/KingOfTheHill''.
* ArtisticLicenseHistory: Kearns did not represent himself in his suit against Ford, nor were any damages awarded; Ford made an undisclosed offer believed to be around $10 million, which Kearns accepted.



* OffOnATechnicality: General Motors couldn't be sued because they designed their own intermittant wiper that did not infringe on Kearns' pattents.

to:

* OffOnATechnicality: AdaptationExplanationExtrication: Kearns is awarded $10.1 million in damages against Ford in 1980. The epilogue reveals he sued Chrysler in 1992 and was awarded $18.7 million. Why Chrysler paid more is never explained. Kearns actually took an undisclosed out-of-court settlement believed to be around $10 million in the suit against Ford, while Chrysler lost and was ordered to pay damages, hence the higher amount. Also not mentioned is General Motors Motors, who couldn't be sued because they designed their own intermittant intermittent wiper that did not infringe on Kearns' pattents.patents).



* WhereAreTheyNow: The closing credits mention that Kearns was awarded $18.7 million in a lawsuit against Chrysler Corp. in 1992, and that he died in 2005.

to:

* WhereAreTheyNow: The closing credits mention that Kearns was awarded $18.7 million in a lawsuit against Chrysler Corp. in 1992, and that he died in 2005.2005.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represents himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson (Creator/AlanAlda), withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw, and Kearns was in fact represented by a team of lawyers, and actually settled with Ford for the $10 million. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, winning $18.7 million.[[note]] It's not entirely clear why Chrysler paid almost double what Ford did, but one theory is that because they bought up American Motors in 1987, they took responsibility for any infringment on AMC's part, another is that they infringed his patent longer than Ford. His case against Ford also set a precedent, making his suit against Chrysler far simpler. General Motors, however, did not get sued because they designed their own intermittent windshield wiper which did not infringe on Kearns' patent.[[/note]] It's possible this was done so as to have a scene where Kearns examines himself in homage to an episode of ''KingOfTheHill''.

to:

* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represents himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson (Creator/AlanAlda), withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw, and Kearns was in fact represented by a team of lawyers, and actually settled with Ford for the $10 million. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, winning $18.7 million.[[note]] It's not entirely clear why Chrysler paid almost double what Ford did, but one theory is that because they bought up American Motors in 1987, they took responsibility for any infringment on AMC's part, another is that they infringed his patent longer than Ford. His case against Ford also set a precedent, making his suit against Chrysler far simpler. General Motors, however, did not get sued because they designed their own intermittent windshield wiper which did not infringe on Kearns' patent.[[/note]] It's possible this was done so as to have a scene where Kearns examines himself in homage to an episode of ''KingOfTheHill''.''WesternAnimation/KingOfTheHill''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''Flash of Genius'' (2008) is the story of Robert Kearns (Greg Kinnear), who develops and patents the intermittent windshield wiper. When he displays it to Ford Motor Company executives, he makes a deal to manufacture it himself and sell it to them.

to:

''Flash '''''Flash of Genius'' Genius''''' (2008) is the story of Robert Kearns (Greg Kinnear), (Creator/GregKinnear), who develops and patents the intermittent windshield wiper. When he displays it to Ford Motor Company executives, he makes a deal to manufacture it himself and sell it to them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represents himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson (Alan Alda), withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw, and Kearns was in fact represented by a team of lawyers, and actually settled with Ford for the $10 million. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, winning $18.7 million.[[note]] It's not entirely clear why Chrysler paid almost double what Ford did, but one theory is that because they bought up American Motors in 1987, they took responsibility for any infringment on AMC's part, another is that they infringed his patent longer than Ford. His case against Ford also set a precedent, making his suit against Chrysler far simpler. General Motors, however, did not get sued because they designed their own intermittent windshield wiper which did not infringe on Kearns' patent.[[/note]] It's possible this was done so as to have a scene where Kearns examines himself in homage to an episode of ''KingOfTheHill''.

to:

* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represents himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson (Alan Alda), (Creator/AlanAlda), withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw, and Kearns was in fact represented by a team of lawyers, and actually settled with Ford for the $10 million. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, winning $18.7 million.[[note]] It's not entirely clear why Chrysler paid almost double what Ford did, but one theory is that because they bought up American Motors in 1987, they took responsibility for any infringment on AMC's part, another is that they infringed his patent longer than Ford. His case against Ford also set a precedent, making his suit against Chrysler far simpler. General Motors, however, did not get sued because they designed their own intermittent windshield wiper which did not infringe on Kearns' patent.[[/note]] It's possible this was done so as to have a scene where Kearns examines himself in homage to an episode of ''KingOfTheHill''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhereAreTheyNow: The closing credits mention he was awarded $18.7 million in a lawsuit against Chrysler Corp. in 1992.

to:

* WhereAreTheyNow: The closing credits mention he that Kearns was awarded $18.7 million in a lawsuit against Chrysler Corp. in 1992.1992, and that he died in 2005.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Hottip cleanup.


* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represents himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson (Alan Alda), withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw, and Kearns was in fact represented by a team of lawyers, and actually settled with Ford for the $10 million. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, winning $18.7 million.[[hottip:*: It's not entirely clear why Chrysler paid almost double what Ford did, but one theory is that because they bought up American Motors in 1987, they took responsibility for any infringment on AMC's part, another is that they infringed his patent longer than Ford. His case against Ford also set a precedent, making his suit against Chrysler far simpler. General Motors, however, did not get sued because they designed their own intermittent windshield wiper which did not infringe on Kearns' patent.]] It's possible this was done so as to have a scene where Kearns examines himself in homage to an episode of ''KingOfTheHill''.

to:

* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represents himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson (Alan Alda), withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw, and Kearns was in fact represented by a team of lawyers, and actually settled with Ford for the $10 million. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, winning $18.7 million.[[hottip:*: [[note]] It's not entirely clear why Chrysler paid almost double what Ford did, but one theory is that because they bought up American Motors in 1987, they took responsibility for any infringment on AMC's part, another is that they infringed his patent longer than Ford. His case against Ford also set a precedent, making his suit against Chrysler far simpler. General Motors, however, did not get sued because they designed their own intermittent windshield wiper which did not infringe on Kearns' patent.]] [[/note]] It's possible this was done so as to have a scene where Kearns examines himself in homage to an episode of ''KingOfTheHill''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ScrewTheMoneyIHaveRules: Ford offers Kearns a $30 million settlement with no admission of wrongdoing. He rejects this, instead going to court, where he's awarded $10.1 million. In RealLife, he subverts this, as he was actually trying to obtain exclusive manufacturing rights (today, over 145 million cars use his design), not for any moral reasons.

to:

* ScrewTheMoneyIHaveRules: Ford offers Kearns a $30 million settlement with no admission of wrongdoing. He rejects this, instead going to court, where he's awarded $10.1 million. In RealLife, he subverts this, as he was actually trying to obtain exclusive manufacturing rights (today, over 145 million cars use his design), not for any moral reasons.reasons, and eventually settled out of court (he was awarded damages in the suit against Chrysler).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* OffOnATechnicality: General Motors couldn't be sued because they designed their own intermittant wiper that did not infringe on Kearns' pattents.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represents himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson (Alan Alda), withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw, and Kearns was in fact represented by a team of lawyers, and actually settled with Ford for the $10 million. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, winning $18.7 million.[[hottip:*: It's not entirely clear why Chrysler paid almost double what Ford did, but one theory is that because they bought up American Motors in 1987, they took responsibility for any infringment on AMC's part. His case against Ford set a precedent, making his suit against Chrysler far simpler. General Motors, however, did not get sued because they designed their own intermittent windshield wiper which did not infringe on Kearns' patent.]] It's possible this was done so as to have a scene where Kearns examines himself in homage to an episode of ''KingOfTheHill''.

to:

* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represents himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson (Alan Alda), withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw, and Kearns was in fact represented by a team of lawyers, and actually settled with Ford for the $10 million. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, winning $18.7 million.[[hottip:*: It's not entirely clear why Chrysler paid almost double what Ford did, but one theory is that because they bought up American Motors in 1987, they took responsibility for any infringment on AMC's part. part, another is that they infringed his patent longer than Ford. His case against Ford also set a precedent, making his suit against Chrysler far simpler. General Motors, however, did not get sued because they designed their own intermittent windshield wiper which did not infringe on Kearns' patent.]] It's possible this was done so as to have a scene where Kearns examines himself in homage to an episode of ''KingOfTheHill''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represents himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson (Alan Alda), withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw, and Kearns was in fact represented by a team of lawyers. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, winning $18.7 million.[[hottip:*: It's not entirely clear why Chrysler paid almost double what Ford did, but one theory is that because they bought up American Motors in 1987, they took responsibility for any infringment on AMC's part. His case against Ford set a precedent, making his suit against Chrysler far simpler. General Motors, however, did not get sued because they designed their own intermittent windshield wiper which did not infringe on Kearns' patent.]] It's possible this was done so as to have a scene where Kearns examines himself in homage to an episode of ''KingOfTheHill''.

to:

* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represents himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson (Alan Alda), withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw, and Kearns was in fact represented by a team of lawyers.lawyers, and actually settled with Ford for the $10 million. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, winning $18.7 million.[[hottip:*: It's not entirely clear why Chrysler paid almost double what Ford did, but one theory is that because they bought up American Motors in 1987, they took responsibility for any infringment on AMC's part. His case against Ford set a precedent, making his suit against Chrysler far simpler. General Motors, however, did not get sued because they designed their own intermittent windshield wiper which did not infringe on Kearns' patent.]] It's possible this was done so as to have a scene where Kearns examines himself in homage to an episode of ''KingOfTheHill''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represents himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson (Alan Alda), withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw and represented Kearns. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, winning $18.7 million.[[hottip:*: It's not entirely clear why Chrysler paid almost double what Ford did, but one theory is that because they bought up American Motors in 1987, they took responsibility for any infringment on AMC's part. General Motors, however, did not get sued because they designed their own intermittent windshield wiper which did not infringe on Kearns' patent.]] It's possible this was done so as to have a scene where Kearns examines himself in homage to an episode of ''KingOfTheHill''.

to:

* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represents himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson (Alan Alda), withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw withdraw, and Kearns was in fact represented Kearns.by a team of lawyers. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, winning $18.7 million.[[hottip:*: It's not entirely clear why Chrysler paid almost double what Ford did, but one theory is that because they bought up American Motors in 1987, they took responsibility for any infringment on AMC's part. His case against Ford set a precedent, making his suit against Chrysler far simpler. General Motors, however, did not get sued because they designed their own intermittent windshield wiper which did not infringe on Kearns' patent.]] It's possible this was done so as to have a scene where Kearns examines himself in homage to an episode of ''KingOfTheHill''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BittersweetEnding: Kearns wins and Ford must admit they stole his design, but his family leaves him long before the trial.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ScrewTheMoneyIHaveRules: Ford offers Kearns a $30 million settlement with no admission of wrongdoing. He rejects this, instead going to court, where he's awarded $10.1 million.

to:

* ScrewTheMoneyIHaveRules: Ford offers Kearns a $30 million settlement with no admission of wrongdoing. He rejects this, instead going to court, where he's awarded $10.1 million. In RealLife, he subverts this, as he was actually trying to obtain exclusive manufacturing rights (today, over 145 million cars use his design), not for any moral reasons.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ScrewTheMoneyIHaveRules: Ford offers Kearns a $30 million settlement, with no admission of wrongdoing. He rejects this, instead going to court, where he's awarded $10.1 million.

to:

* ScrewTheMoneyIHaveRules: Ford offers Kearns a $30 million settlement, settlement with no admission of wrongdoing. He rejects this, instead going to court, where he's awarded $10.1 million.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ScrewTheMoneyIHaveRules: Ford offers Kearns a $30 million settlement, with no admission of wrongdoing, which he rejects, instead going to court, where he's awarded $10.1 million.

to:

* ScrewTheMoneyIHaveRules: Ford offers Kearns a $30 million settlement, with no admission of wrongdoing, which he rejects, wrongdoing. He rejects this, instead going to court, where he's awarded $10.1 million.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ScrewTheMoneyIHaveRules: Ford offers Kearns a $30 million settlement, with no acknowledgement of wrongdoing, which he rejects, instead going to court, where he's awarded $10.1 million.

to:

* ScrewTheMoneyIHaveRules: Ford offers Kearns a $30 million settlement, with no acknowledgement admission of wrongdoing, which he rejects, instead going to court, where he's awarded $10.1 million.

Added: 120

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ScrewTheMoneyIHaveRules: Ford offers Kearns a $30 million settlement, with no acknoledgment of wrongdoing, which he rejects, instead going to court, where he's awarded $10.1 million.
* WhatHappenedToTheMouse: We never find out what happens regarding Kearns' vandalism of some random person's brand new Cadillac.

to:

* ScrewTheMoneyIHaveRules: Ford offers Kearns a $30 million settlement, with no acknoledgment acknowledgement of wrongdoing, which he rejects, instead going to court, where he's awarded $10.1 million.
* WhatHappenedToTheMouse: We never find out what happens regarding Kearns' vandalism of some random person's brand new Cadillac.Cadillac.
* WhereAreTheyNow: The closing credits mention he was awarded $18.7 million in a lawsuit against Chrysler Corp. in 1992.

Added: 609

Changed: 140

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''Flash of Genius'' (2008) is the story of Robert Kearns (Greg Kinnear), who develops and patents the intermittent windshield wiper. When he displays it to Ford Motor Company executives, he makes a deal to manufacture it himself and sell it to them.

Eventually, while attending a Ford dealers convention displaying the Mustang, he discovers Ford used his design without his consent, credit or payment, and decides to sue Ford.



* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represents himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson, withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw and represented Kearns. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, winning $18.7 million.[[hottip:*: It's not entirely clear why Chrysler paid almost double what Ford did, but one theory is that because they bought up American Motors in 1987, they took responsibility for any infringment on AMC's part. General Motors, however, did not get sued because they designed their own intermittant windshield wiper which did not infringe on Kearns' patent.]]

to:

* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represents himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson, Lawson (Alan Alda), withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw and represented Kearns. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, winning $18.7 million.[[hottip:*: It's not entirely clear why Chrysler paid almost double what Ford did, but one theory is that because they bought up American Motors in 1987, they took responsibility for any infringment on AMC's part. General Motors, however, did not get sued because they designed their own intermittant intermittent windshield wiper which did not infringe on Kearns' patent.]]]] It's possible this was done so as to have a scene where Kearns examines himself in homage to an episode of ''KingOfTheHill''.
* ScrewTheMoneyIHaveRules: Ford offers Kearns a $30 million settlement, with no acknoledgment of wrongdoing, which he rejects, instead going to court, where he's awarded $10.1 million.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represents himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson, withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw and represented Kearns. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, winning $18.7 million.[[hottip:*: It's not entirely clear why Chrysler paid almost double what Ford did, but one theory is that because they bought up American Motors in 1987, they took responsibility for any infringment AMC did. General Motors, however, did not get sued because they designed their own intermittant windshield wiper which did not infringe on Kearns' patent.]]

to:

* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represents himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson, withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw and represented Kearns. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, winning $18.7 million.[[hottip:*: It's not entirely clear why Chrysler paid almost double what Ford did, but one theory is that because they bought up American Motors in 1987, they took responsibility for any infringment AMC did.on AMC's part. General Motors, however, did not get sued because they designed their own intermittant windshield wiper which did not infringe on Kearns' patent.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

!!This film provides examples of the following tropes:
* AFoolForAClient: Kearns represents himself against Ford in 1980, after his attorney, Gregory Lawson, withdraws from the case, and is awarded $10.1 million in damages. In RealLife, Lawson did not withdraw and represented Kearns. Kearns did, however, represent himself against Chrysler in 1992, winning $18.7 million.[[hottip:*: It's not entirely clear why Chrysler paid almost double what Ford did, but one theory is that because they bought up American Motors in 1987, they took responsibility for any infringment AMC did. General Motors, however, did not get sued because they designed their own intermittant windshield wiper which did not infringe on Kearns' patent.]]
* WhatHappenedToTheMouse: We never find out what happens regarding Kearns' vandalism of some random person's brand new Cadillac.

Top