Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Film / DisneyLiveActionRemakes

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AdaptationalHeroism: Bad or neutral guys often do a HeelFaceTurn, or turn out to be good from the start. The title character ''Film/{{Maleficent}}'' turned out to be the real heroin, but also [[spoiler: Lefou turn his back on Gaston at the end of ''Beauty and the Beast'']]. The Ringmaster aka Max Medici also TookALevelInKindness, as [[spoiler: V. A. Vandevere turned out to be even worse.]] The only inversion so far is in ''Film/Cinderella2015'', [[spoiler: as the Duke went through AdaptationalVillainy.]]
* AscendedExtra:At least one human character tend to get more screentime in the remakes. There was the ringmaster in ''Film/{{Dumbo|2019}}', Aurora in ''Film/{{Maleficent}}'', and the Enchantress in ''Film/BeautyAndTheBeast2017''.


Added DiffLines:

* DemotedToExtra: [[Animals sidekicks NonHumanSidekick]] tends to fall under this, as they lost their voice with the change of medium.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
cut page


* ''Film/{{Mulan|2020}}'' (2020)

to:

* ''Film/{{Mulan|2020}}'' ''Mulan'' (2020)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/TheLionKing2019''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/TheLionKing2019'' (2019)

to:

* ''Film/TheLionKing2019'' (2019)''Film/TheLionKing2019''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/TheLionKing2019'' (2019)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Hercules'' (TBA)
* ''Chronicles of Prydain'' (TBA)

Added: 20

Removed: 20

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Cruella has been scheduled for a December 23, 2020 release.


* ''Cruella'' (2020)



* ''Cruella'' (TBA)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Argue what you will, but it's still a live action remake of a Disney film, so I don't see why it shouldn't be here

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/PetesDragon2016''

Added: 294

Changed: 291

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EarlyInstallmentWeirdness: ''Maleficent'' started the trend of live-action remakes but it's ''not'' a remake. It's a PerspectiveFlip and is loose with its canon (most noticeable in Maleficent's character change and how the ending is completely different from ''Sleeping Beauty'''s) to the point of AlternateContinuity.

to:

* EarlyInstallmentWeirdness: EarlyInstallmentWeirdness:
**
''Maleficent'' started the trend of live-action remakes but it's ''not'' a remake. It's a PerspectiveFlip and is loose with its canon (most noticeable in Maleficent's character change and how the ending is completely different from ''Sleeping Beauty'''s) to the point of AlternateContinuity.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''Maleficent: Mistress Of Evil'' (2019)

to:

** ''Maleficent: Mistress Of Evil'' ''Film/MaleficentMistressOfEvil'' (2019)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Note the existence of several earlier films that helped kickstart the trend, starting with 1996's [[Film/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians remake]] of ''Disney/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians'', but aren't considered part of the franchise proper. ''Film/AliceInWonderland2010'' is also, per WordOfGod, completely unrelated to the [[Disney/AliceInWonderland Disney classic]] despite being a live-action adaptation done by Disney.[[note]] which is obviously not ''quite'' true, starting with the appearance of the Caterpillar that closely parallels the 1951 animated film.[[/note]] ''Film/TheLionKing2019'' is also [[ExactWords technically]] not a live-action remake due to the apparent absence of onscreen humans like the original, despite having everything else in common with the current line. ''Film/ChristopherRobin'' is also not considered part of the franchise, despite being a live-action/CGI film based on an earlier Disney property, as it is a sequel to ''Disney/TheManyAdventuresOfWinnieThePooh'' rather than a remake. The television series ''Series/OnceUponATime'' is also not a part of this franchise, even though it features various reimaginings of Disney characters in live-action form [[note]] Originally, the series simply ''took inspiration'' from Disney but the characters were not explicitly related to their Disney counterparts; eventually this was done away with and ''[=OUAT=]'' outright includes Disney original characters like Elsa or Jasmine. [[/note]] There's an upcoming comedy film called ''Prince Charming'' in production, which is about a PrinceCharmless pretending to be his brother PrinceCharming after several princesses attack Charming for two-timing them (poking fun at [[OneSteveLimit Disney having more than one "Prince Charming"]]), however it's not considered a part

to:

Note the existence of several earlier films that helped kickstart the trend, starting with 1996's [[Film/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians remake]] of ''Disney/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians'', but aren't considered part of the franchise proper. ''Film/AliceInWonderland2010'' is also, per WordOfGod, completely unrelated to the [[Disney/AliceInWonderland Disney classic]] despite being a live-action adaptation done by Disney.[[note]] which is obviously not ''quite'' true, starting with the appearance of the Caterpillar that closely parallels the 1951 animated film.[[/note]] ''Film/TheLionKing2019'' is also [[ExactWords technically]] not a live-action remake due to the apparent absence of onscreen humans like the original, despite having everything else in common with the current line. ''Film/ChristopherRobin'' is also not considered part of the franchise, despite being a live-action/CGI film based on an earlier Disney property, as it is a sequel to ''Disney/TheManyAdventuresOfWinnieThePooh'' rather than a remake. The television series ''Series/OnceUponATime'' is also not a part of this franchise, even though it features various reimaginings of Disney characters in live-action form [[note]] Originally, the series simply ''took inspiration'' from Disney but the characters were not explicitly related to their Disney counterparts; eventually this was done away with and ''[=OUAT=]'' outright includes Disney original characters like Elsa or Jasmine. [[/note]] There's an upcoming comedy film called ''Prince Charming'' in production, which is about a PrinceCharmless pretending to be his brother PrinceCharming after several princesses attack Charming for two-timing them (poking fun at [[OneSteveLimit Disney having more than one "Prince Charming"]]), however it's not considered a part
part of the franchise either.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Note the existence of several earlier films that helped kickstart the trend, starting with the 1996's [[Film/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians remake]] of ''Disney/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians'', but aren't considered part of the franchise proper. ''Film/AliceInWonderland2010'' is also, per WordOfGod, completely unrelated to the [[Disney/AliceInWonderland Disney classic]] despite being a live-action adaptation done by Disney.[[note]] which is obviously not ''quite'' true, starting with the appearance of the Caterpillar that closely parallels the 1951 animated film.[[/note]] ''Film/TheLionKing2019'' is also [[ExactWords technically]] not a live-action remake due to the apparent absence of onscreen humans like the original, despite having everything else in common with the current line. ''Film/ChristopherRobin'' is also not considered part of the franchise, despite being a live-action/CGI film based on an earlier Disney property, as it is a sequel to ''Disney/TheManyAdventuresOfWinnieThePooh'' rather than a remake. The television series ''Series/OnceUponATime'' is also not a part of this franchise, even though it features various reimaginings of Disney characters in live-action form [[note]] Originally, the series simply ''took inspiration'' from Disney but the characters were not explicitly related to their Disney counterparts; eventually this was done away with and ''[=OUAT=]'' outright includes Disney original characters like Elsa or Jasmine. [[/note]] There's an upcoming comedy film called ''Prince Charming'' in production, which is about a PrinceCharmless pretending to be his brother PrinceCharming after several princesses attack Charming for two-timing them (poking fun at [[OneSteveLimit Disney having more than one "Prince Charming"]]), however it's not considered a part

to:

Note the existence of several earlier films that helped kickstart the trend, starting with the 1996's [[Film/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians remake]] of ''Disney/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians'', but aren't considered part of the franchise proper. ''Film/AliceInWonderland2010'' is also, per WordOfGod, completely unrelated to the [[Disney/AliceInWonderland Disney classic]] despite being a live-action adaptation done by Disney.[[note]] which is obviously not ''quite'' true, starting with the appearance of the Caterpillar that closely parallels the 1951 animated film.[[/note]] ''Film/TheLionKing2019'' is also [[ExactWords technically]] not a live-action remake due to the apparent absence of onscreen humans like the original, despite having everything else in common with the current line. ''Film/ChristopherRobin'' is also not considered part of the franchise, despite being a live-action/CGI film based on an earlier Disney property, as it is a sequel to ''Disney/TheManyAdventuresOfWinnieThePooh'' rather than a remake. The television series ''Series/OnceUponATime'' is also not a part of this franchise, even though it features various reimaginings of Disney characters in live-action form [[note]] Originally, the series simply ''took inspiration'' from Disney but the characters were not explicitly related to their Disney counterparts; eventually this was done away with and ''[=OUAT=]'' outright includes Disney original characters like Elsa or Jasmine. [[/note]] There's an upcoming comedy film called ''Prince Charming'' in production, which is about a PrinceCharmless pretending to be his brother PrinceCharming after several princesses attack Charming for two-timing them (poking fun at [[OneSteveLimit Disney having more than one "Prince Charming"]]), however it's not considered a part
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In 2014, Creator/{{Disney}} released their reimagining of their classic ''Disney/SleepingBeauty'' film. ''Film/{{Maleficent}}'' was a PerspectiveFlip AlternateUniverse take on the story. Maleficent isn't the evil fairy witch she is in the original, instead she is a troubled, introverted fairy who was was spurned into hating humans by a bad experience one year ago. Aurora, whose rather FlatCharacter was replaced with something more in-depth, grew up believing Maleficent was her FairyGodmother, as much as Maleficent tried to become her enemy. The film's interesting new take on ''Sleeping Beauty'''s characters ended in it becoming one of the biggest hits of the year.

to:

In 2014, Creator/{{Disney}} released their ''Film/{{Maleficent}}'', a live-action reimagining of their classic ''Disney/SleepingBeauty'' animated film. ''Film/{{Maleficent}}'' It was a PerspectiveFlip AlternateUniverse take on the story. Maleficent isn't the evil fairy witch she is in the original, as instead she is a troubled, introverted fairy who was was spurned into hating humans by a bad experience one year ago.before Princess Aurora is born. Aurora, whose rather FlatCharacter was replaced with something more in-depth, grew up believing Maleficent was her FairyGodmother, as much as Maleficent tried to become her enemy. The film's interesting new take on ''Sleeping Beauty'''s characters ended in it becoming one of the biggest hits of the year.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/LadyAndTheTramp'' (2019) [[note]]This will be the first direct-to-streaming film in the series, as it's being made for [[/index]]Creator/DisneyPlus[[index]].[[/note]]

to:

* ''Film/LadyAndTheTramp'' ''Lady And The Tramp'' (2019) [[note]]This will be the first direct-to-streaming film in the series, as it's being made for [[/index]]Creator/DisneyPlus[[index]].[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''Maleficent Mistress Of Evil'' (2019)

to:

** ''Maleficent ''Maleficent: Mistress Of Evil'' (2019)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
page has been cut


** ''Film/MaleficentMistressOfEvil'' (2019)

to:

** ''Film/MaleficentMistressOfEvil'' ''Maleficent Mistress Of Evil'' (2019)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Lady and the Tramp'' (2019) [[note]]This will be the first direct-to-streaming film in the series, as it's being made for [[/index]]Creator/DisneyPlus[[index]].[[/note]]

to:

* ''Lady and the Tramp'' ''Film/LadyAndTheTramp'' (2019) [[note]]This will be the first direct-to-streaming film in the series, as it's being made for [[/index]]Creator/DisneyPlus[[index]].[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''Maleficent 2'' (TBA)

to:

** ''Maleficent 2'' (TBA)''Film/MaleficentMistressOfEvil'' (2019)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** If you consider 1996's ''Film/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians'' to be the unofficial start of the franchise, then it's ''very'' different from the live-action remakes that followed. Most notably, it averts the current DarkerAndEdgier trend, going in the complete opposite direction. Many have noted the irony that the live-action ''101 Dalmatians'' manages to be more cartoonish than the actual cartoon version.

to:

** If you consider 1996's ''Film/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians'' to be the unofficial start of the franchise, then it's ''very'' different from the live-action remakes that followed. Most notably, it averts In contrast to the current DarkerAndEdgier trend, going approach, it goes in the complete opposite direction. Many have noted direction and plays the irony story for broad slapstick. It has often been said that the live-action ''101 Dalmatians'' manages to be is, ironically, more cartoonish than the actual cartoon version.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** If you consider 1996's ''Film/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians'' to be the unofficial start of the franchise, then it's ''very'' different from the live-action remakes that followed. Most notably, it averts the current DarkerAndEdgier trend, going in the complete opposite direction. Many have noted the irony that the live-action ''101 Dalmatians'' manages to be more cartoonish than the actual cartoon version.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Note the existence of several earlier films that helped kickstart the trend, starting with the 1996's [[Film/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians remake]] of ''Disney/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians'', but aren't considered part of the franchise proper. ''Film/AliceInWonderland2010'' is also, per WordOfGod, completely unrelated to the [[Disney/AliceInWonderland Disney classic]] despite being a live-action adaptation done by Disney.[[note]] which is obviously not ''quite'' true, starting with the appearance of the Caterpillar that closely parallels the 1951 animated film.[[/note]] ''Film/TheLionKing2019'' is also [[ExactWords technically]] not a live-action remake due to the apparent absence of onscreen humans like the original, despite having everything else in common with the current line. The television series ''Series/OnceUponATime'' is also not a part of this franchise, even though it features various reimaginings of Disney characters in live-action form [[note]] Originally, the series simply ''took inspiration'' from Disney but the characters were not explicitly related to their Disney counterparts; eventually this was done away with and ''[=OUAT=]'' outright includes Disney original characters like Elsa or Jasmine. [[/note]] There's an upcoming comedy film called ''Prince Charming'' in production, which is about a PrinceCharmless pretending to be his brother PrinceCharming after several princesses attack Charming for two-timing them (poking fun at [[OneSteveLimit Disney having more than one "Prince Charming"]]), however it's not considered a part

to:

Note the existence of several earlier films that helped kickstart the trend, starting with the 1996's [[Film/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians remake]] of ''Disney/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians'', but aren't considered part of the franchise proper. ''Film/AliceInWonderland2010'' is also, per WordOfGod, completely unrelated to the [[Disney/AliceInWonderland Disney classic]] despite being a live-action adaptation done by Disney.[[note]] which is obviously not ''quite'' true, starting with the appearance of the Caterpillar that closely parallels the 1951 animated film.[[/note]] ''Film/TheLionKing2019'' is also [[ExactWords technically]] not a live-action remake due to the apparent absence of onscreen humans like the original, despite having everything else in common with the current line. ''Film/ChristopherRobin'' is also not considered part of the franchise, despite being a live-action/CGI film based on an earlier Disney property, as it is a sequel to ''Disney/TheManyAdventuresOfWinnieThePooh'' rather than a remake. The television series ''Series/OnceUponATime'' is also not a part of this franchise, even though it features various reimaginings of Disney characters in live-action form [[note]] Originally, the series simply ''took inspiration'' from Disney but the characters were not explicitly related to their Disney counterparts; eventually this was done away with and ''[=OUAT=]'' outright includes Disney original characters like Elsa or Jasmine. [[/note]] There's an upcoming comedy film called ''Prince Charming'' in production, which is about a PrinceCharmless pretending to be his brother PrinceCharming after several princesses attack Charming for two-timing them (poking fun at [[OneSteveLimit Disney having more than one "Prince Charming"]]), however it's not considered a part
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Note the existence of several earlier films that helped kickstart the trend, starting with the 1996's [[Film/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians remake]] of ''Disney/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians'', but aren't considered part of the franchise proper. ''Film/AliceInWonderland2010'' is also, per WordOfGod, completely unrelated to the [[Disney/AliceInWonderland Disney classic]] despite being a live-action adaptation done by Disney.[[note]] which is obviously not ''quite'' true, starting with the appearance of the Caterpillar that closely parallels the 1951 animated film.[[/note]] ''Film/TheLionKing2019'' is also [[ExactWords technically]] not a live-action remake due to the apparent absence of onscreen humans like the original, despite having everything else in common with the current line. The television series ''Series/OnceUponATime'' is also not a part of this franchise, even though it features various reimaginings of Disney characters in live-action form [[note]] Originally, the series simply ''took inspiration'' from Disney but the characters were not explicitly related to their Disney counterparts; eventually this was done away with and ''[=OUAT=]'' outright includes Disney original characters like Elsa or Jasmine. [[/note]] There's an upcoming parody film called ''Prince Charming'' in production, which is about a PrinceCharmless pretending to be his brother PrinceCharming after several princesses attack Charming for two-timing them (poking fun at [[OneSteveLimit Disney having more than one "Prince Charming"]]), however it's not considered a part

to:

Note the existence of several earlier films that helped kickstart the trend, starting with the 1996's [[Film/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians remake]] of ''Disney/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians'', but aren't considered part of the franchise proper. ''Film/AliceInWonderland2010'' is also, per WordOfGod, completely unrelated to the [[Disney/AliceInWonderland Disney classic]] despite being a live-action adaptation done by Disney.[[note]] which is obviously not ''quite'' true, starting with the appearance of the Caterpillar that closely parallels the 1951 animated film.[[/note]] ''Film/TheLionKing2019'' is also [[ExactWords technically]] not a live-action remake due to the apparent absence of onscreen humans like the original, despite having everything else in common with the current line. The television series ''Series/OnceUponATime'' is also not a part of this franchise, even though it features various reimaginings of Disney characters in live-action form [[note]] Originally, the series simply ''took inspiration'' from Disney but the characters were not explicitly related to their Disney counterparts; eventually this was done away with and ''[=OUAT=]'' outright includes Disney original characters like Elsa or Jasmine. [[/note]] There's an upcoming parody comedy film called ''Prince Charming'' in production, which is about a PrinceCharmless pretending to be his brother PrinceCharming after several princesses attack Charming for two-timing them (poking fun at [[OneSteveLimit Disney having more than one "Prince Charming"]]), however it's not considered a part

Changed: 329

Removed: 122

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Note the existence of several earlier films that helped kickstart the trend, starting with the 1996's [[Film/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians remake]] of ''Disney/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians'', but aren't considered part of the franchise proper. ''Film/AliceInWonderland2010'' is also, per WordOfGod, completely unrelated to the [[Disney/AliceInWonderland Disney classic]] despite being a live-action adaptation done by Disney.[[note]] which is obviously not ''quite'' true, starting with the appearance of the Caterpillar that closely parallels the 1951 animated film.[[/note]] ''Film/TheLionKing2019'' is also [[ExactWords technically]] not a live-action remake due to the apparent absence of onscreen humans like the original, despite having everything else in common with the current line. The television series ''Series/OnceUponATime'' is also not a part of this franchise, even though it features various reimaginings of Disney characters in live-action form [[note]] Originally, the series simply ''took inspiration'' from Disney but the characters were not explicitly related to their Disney counterparts; eventually this was done away with and ''[=OUAT=]'' outright includes Disney original characters like Elsa or Jasmine. [[/note]]

to:

Note the existence of several earlier films that helped kickstart the trend, starting with the 1996's [[Film/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians remake]] of ''Disney/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians'', but aren't considered part of the franchise proper. ''Film/AliceInWonderland2010'' is also, per WordOfGod, completely unrelated to the [[Disney/AliceInWonderland Disney classic]] despite being a live-action adaptation done by Disney.[[note]] which is obviously not ''quite'' true, starting with the appearance of the Caterpillar that closely parallels the 1951 animated film.[[/note]] ''Film/TheLionKing2019'' is also [[ExactWords technically]] not a live-action remake due to the apparent absence of onscreen humans like the original, despite having everything else in common with the current line. The television series ''Series/OnceUponATime'' is also not a part of this franchise, even though it features various reimaginings of Disney characters in live-action form [[note]] Originally, the series simply ''took inspiration'' from Disney but the characters were not explicitly related to their Disney counterparts; eventually this was done away with and ''[=OUAT=]'' outright includes Disney original characters like Elsa or Jasmine. [[/note]]
[[/note]] There's an upcoming parody film called ''Prince Charming'' in production, which is about a PrinceCharmless pretending to be his brother PrinceCharming after several princesses attack Charming for two-timing them (poking fun at [[OneSteveLimit Disney having more than one "Prince Charming"]]), however it's not considered a part



* ''Prince Charming'' (TBA) [[note]]A parody rather than an adaptation, but it's still put in the same franchise.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''The Hunchback of Notre Dame'' (TBA)

Changed: 19

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Lady and the Tramp'' (2019) [[note]]This will be the first direct-to-streaming film in the series, as it's being made for Creator/DisneyPlus.[[/note]]

to:

* ''Lady and the Tramp'' (2019) [[note]]This will be the first direct-to-streaming film in the series, as it's being made for Creator/DisneyPlus.[[/index]]Creator/DisneyPlus[[index]].[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Note the existence of several earlier films that helped kickstart the trend, starting with the 1996's [[Film/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians remake]] of ''Disney/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians'', but aren't considered part of the franchise proper. ''Film/AliceInWonderland2010'' is also, per WordOfGod, completely unrelated to the [[Disney/AliceInWonderland Disney classic]] despite being a live-action adaptation done by Disney.[[note]] which is obviously not ''quite'' true, starting with the appearance of the Caterpillar that closely parallels the 1951 animated film.[[/note]] ''Film/TheLionKing2019'' is also technically not a live-action remake due to the apparent lack of onscreen humans, despite having everything else in common. The television series ''Series/OnceUponATime'' is also not a part of this franchise, even though it features various reimaginings of Disney characters in live-action form [[note]] Originally, the series simply ''took inspiration'' from Disney but the characters were not explicitly related to their Disney counterparts; eventually this was done away with and ''[=OUAT=]'' outright includes Disney original characters like Elsa or Jasmine. [[/note]]

to:

Note the existence of several earlier films that helped kickstart the trend, starting with the 1996's [[Film/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians remake]] of ''Disney/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians'', but aren't considered part of the franchise proper. ''Film/AliceInWonderland2010'' is also, per WordOfGod, completely unrelated to the [[Disney/AliceInWonderland Disney classic]] despite being a live-action adaptation done by Disney.[[note]] which is obviously not ''quite'' true, starting with the appearance of the Caterpillar that closely parallels the 1951 animated film.[[/note]] ''Film/TheLionKing2019'' is also technically [[ExactWords technically]] not a live-action remake due to the apparent lack absence of onscreen humans, humans like the original, despite having everything else in common.common with the current line. The television series ''Series/OnceUponATime'' is also not a part of this franchise, even though it features various reimaginings of Disney characters in live-action form [[note]] Originally, the series simply ''took inspiration'' from Disney but the characters were not explicitly related to their Disney counterparts; eventually this was done away with and ''[=OUAT=]'' outright includes Disney original characters like Elsa or Jasmine. [[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Note the existence of several earlier films that helped kickstart the trend, starting with the 1996's [[Film/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians remake]] of ''Disney/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians'', but aren't considered part of the franchise proper. ''Film/AliceInWonderland2010'' is also, per WordOfGod, completely unrelated to the [[Disney/AliceInWonderland Disney classic]] despite being a live-action adaptation done by Disney[[note]] which is obviously not ''quite'' true, starting with the appearance of the Caterpillar that closely parallels the 1951 animated film[[/note]]. ''Film/TheLionKing2019'' is also technically not a live-action remake due to the apparent lack of onscreen humans. The television series ''Series/OnceUponATime'' is also not a part of this franchise, even though it features various reimaginings of Disney characters in live-action form [[note]] Originally, the series simply ''took inspiration'' from Disney but the characters were not explicitly related to their Disney counterparts; eventually this was done away with and ''[=OUAT=]'' outright includes Disney original characters like Elsa or Jasmine. [[/note]]

to:

Note the existence of several earlier films that helped kickstart the trend, starting with the 1996's [[Film/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians remake]] of ''Disney/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians'', but aren't considered part of the franchise proper. ''Film/AliceInWonderland2010'' is also, per WordOfGod, completely unrelated to the [[Disney/AliceInWonderland Disney classic]] despite being a live-action adaptation done by Disney[[note]] Disney.[[note]] which is obviously not ''quite'' true, starting with the appearance of the Caterpillar that closely parallels the 1951 animated film[[/note]]. film.[[/note]] ''Film/TheLionKing2019'' is also technically not a live-action remake due to the apparent lack of onscreen humans.humans, despite having everything else in common. The television series ''Series/OnceUponATime'' is also not a part of this franchise, even though it features various reimaginings of Disney characters in live-action form [[note]] Originally, the series simply ''took inspiration'' from Disney but the characters were not explicitly related to their Disney counterparts; eventually this was done away with and ''[=OUAT=]'' outright includes Disney original characters like Elsa or Jasmine. [[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Note the existence of several earlier films that helped kickstart the trend, starting with the 1996's [[Film/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians remake]] of ''Disney/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians'', but aren't considered part of the franchise proper. ''Film/AliceInWonderland2010'' is also, per WordOfGod, completely unrelated to the [[Disney/AliceInWonderland Disney classic]] despite being a live-action adaptation done by Disney[[note]] which is obviously not ''quite'' true, starting with the appearance of the Caterpillar that closely parallels the 1951 animated film[[/note]]. The television series ''Series/OnceUponATime'' is also not a part of this franchise, even though it features various reimaginings of Disney characters in live-action form [[note]] Originally, the series simply ''took inspiration'' from Disney but the characters were not explicitly related to their Disney counterparts; eventually this was done away with and ''[=OUAT=]'' outright includes Disney original characters like Elsa or Jasmine. [[/note]]

to:

Note the existence of several earlier films that helped kickstart the trend, starting with the 1996's [[Film/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians remake]] of ''Disney/OneHundredAndOneDalmatians'', but aren't considered part of the franchise proper. ''Film/AliceInWonderland2010'' is also, per WordOfGod, completely unrelated to the [[Disney/AliceInWonderland Disney classic]] despite being a live-action adaptation done by Disney[[note]] which is obviously not ''quite'' true, starting with the appearance of the Caterpillar that closely parallels the 1951 animated film[[/note]]. ''Film/TheLionKing2019'' is also technically not a live-action remake due to the apparent lack of onscreen humans. The television series ''Series/OnceUponATime'' is also not a part of this franchise, even though it features various reimaginings of Disney characters in live-action form [[note]] Originally, the series simply ''took inspiration'' from Disney but the characters were not explicitly related to their Disney counterparts; eventually this was done away with and ''[=OUAT=]'' outright includes Disney original characters like Elsa or Jasmine. [[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Note edits.


* ''Film/BeautyAndTheBeast2017'' [[note]]the first film in the series to be a [[TheMusical musical]] like [[AnimatedMusical its source material]][[/note]]

to:

* ''Film/BeautyAndTheBeast2017'' [[note]]the [[note]]The first film in the series to be a [[TheMusical musical]] like [[AnimatedMusical its source material]][[/note]]material]].[[/note]]



* ''Lady and the Tramp'' (2019)

to:

* ''Lady and the Tramp'' (2019)(2019) [[note]]This will be the first direct-to-streaming film in the series, as it's being made for Creator/DisneyPlus.[[/note]]



* ''Prince Charming'' (TBA) [[note]]a parody rather than an adaptation but is still put in the same franchise[[/note]]

to:

* ''Prince Charming'' (TBA) [[note]]a [[note]]A parody rather than an adaptation adaptation, but is it's still put in the same franchise[[/note]]franchise.[[/note]]



* NamedByTheAdaptation: Characters who weren't named in the animated originals, such as the Beast and ''Cinderella'''s Prince Charming, are given names in the remakes.

to:

* NamedByTheAdaptation: Characters who weren't named in the animated originals, such as the Beast and ''Cinderella'''s ''Cinderella''[='=]s Prince Charming, are given names in the remakes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* EarlyInstallmentWeirdness: ''Maleficent'' started the trend of live-action remakes but it's ''not'' a remake. It's a PerspectiveFlip and is loose with its canon (most noticeable in Maleficent's character change and how the ending is completely different from ''Sleeping Beauty'''s) to the point of AlternateContinuity.

Top