Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Film / BeyondAReasonableDoubt

Go To

OR

Changed: 279

Removed: 106

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EveryCarIsAPinto: Which is a bad thing for both Austin and Tom--bad for Austin because he dies in a fireball after his car is hit by a truck, and bad for Tom because Austin had all the exculpatory photos and documents in his car, where they are burned to a crisp.

to:

* EveryCarIsAPinto: Which is a bad thing for both Austin and Tom--bad Tom. Bad for Austin because he dies in a fireball after his car is hit by a truck, and bad for Tom because Austin had all the exculpatory photos and documents in his car, where they are burned to a crisp.



%% * GettingCrapPastThe Radar: Due to overwhelming and persistent misuse, GCPTR is on-page examples only until 01 June 2021. If you are reading this in the future, please check the trope page to make sure your example fits the current definition.
* GoldDigger:
** Dolly is a pretty grubby one, describing Tom as "the best score I've made in a long time."

to:

%% * GettingCrapPastThe Radar: Due to overwhelming and persistent misuse, GCPTR is on-page examples only until 01 June 2021. If you are reading this in the future, please check the trope page to make sure your example fits the current definition.
* GoldDigger:
**
GoldDigger: Dolly is a pretty grubby one, describing Tom as "the best score I've made in a long time."

Changed: 310

Removed: 121

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GettingCrapPastTheRadar: Tom says he "had to" marry Patty, implying it's because she [[TheBabyTrap claimed to be pregnant]], something a film wouldn't openly say then. Susan also makes a just barely veiled request for sex.
--> '''Susan''': But I feel like dancing now.\\
'''Tom''': All right. Where?\\
'''Susan''': I've never seen your apartment.

to:

%% * GettingCrapPastTheRadar: Tom says he "had to" marry Patty, implying it's because she [[TheBabyTrap claimed GettingCrapPastThe Radar: Due to be pregnant]], something a film wouldn't openly say then. Susan also makes a just barely veiled request for sex.
--> '''Susan''': But I feel like dancing now.\\
'''Tom''': All right. Where?\\
'''Susan''': I've never seen
overwhelming and persistent misuse, GCPTR is on-page examples only until 01 June 2021. If you are reading this in the future, please check the trope page to make sure your apartment.example fits the current definition.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* INeverSaidItWasPoison: Tom and Susan are deliriously happy over Tom's exculpation and imminent pardon, when Tom makes the mistake of wondering who really killed "Emma". Susan picks up on this immediately, noting that this detail, that Patty's real name was Emma Blucher, was never revealed. Tom then admits that Emma Blucher was his wife, and he really did kill her, in order to free himself to marry Susan.

to:

* INeverSaidItWasPoison: Tom and Susan are deliriously happy over Tom's exculpation and imminent pardon, when Tom makes the mistake of wondering who really killed "Emma". Susan picks up on this immediately, noting that this detail, that Patty's real name was Emma Blucher, was never revealed.revealed publicly. Tom then admits that Emma Blucher was his wife, and he really did kill her, in order to free himself to marry Susan.

Added: 244

Changed: 90

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ContrivedCoincidence: The unsolved murder that Austin Spencer randomly selects for his scheme just happens to be the one that Tom actually committed.



* GoldDigger: Dolly is a pretty grubby one, describing Tom as "the best score I've made in a long time."

to:

* GoldDigger: GoldDigger:
**
Dolly is a pretty grubby one, describing Tom as "the best score I've made in a long time."

Added: 392

Changed: 389

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* IdiotBall: Or maybe PlotHole...but since Tom turned out to be guilty after all, why in the name of all that's holy did he agree to this scheme in the first place? Why deliberately implicate yourself in a murder that you actually committed and have gotten away with? Apparently he thought nobody in their right mind would suspect he ''did'' do it after getting exonerated, but that backfired horribly.

to:

* IdiotBall: IdiotBall:
**
Or maybe PlotHole...but since Tom turned out to be guilty after all, why in the name of all that's holy did he agree to this scheme in the first place? Why deliberately implicate yourself in a murder that you actually committed and have gotten away with? Apparently he thought nobody in their right mind would suspect he ''did'' do it after getting exonerated, but that backfired horribly.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** This also occurs with Tom's admission to Susan. As Tom was a former newspaperman, and he was trying to get himself framed, he could have easily said he did research into Patty's real identity to make the frameup more convincing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Andrews is Tom Garrett, a former newspaperman turned author engaged to Susan Spencer (Fontaine), the daughter of his old boss, newspaper publisher Austin Spencer. Austin Spencer is an anti-death penalty activist who at the beginning of the movie has taken Tom to see an execution. Austin springs an idea on Tom: expose the death penalty for an injustice by planting circumstantial evidence suggesting someone is guilty, then reveal the truth after the innocent man is convicted and sentenced to death. The front-page articles about the murder of a local stripper named Patty Gray provide the opportunity Tom and Austin are looking for, and Tom volunteers to set himself up. Tom is convicted as planned, but that's all right, as Austin is ready to clear his name... until ThePlotReaper intervenes, and Tom is facing the death penalty for real.

to:

Andrews is Tom Garrett, a former newspaperman turned author engaged to Susan Spencer (Fontaine), the daughter of his old boss, newspaper publisher Austin Spencer.Spencer (Sidney Blackmer). Austin Spencer is an anti-death penalty activist who at the beginning of the movie has taken Tom to see an execution. Austin springs an idea on Tom: expose the death penalty for an injustice by planting circumstantial evidence suggesting someone is guilty, then reveal the truth after the innocent man is convicted and sentenced to death. The front-page articles about the murder of a local stripper named Patty Gray provide the opportunity Tom and Austin are looking for, and Tom volunteers to set himself up. Tom is convicted as planned, but that's all right, as Austin is ready to clear his name... until ThePlotReaper intervenes, and Tom is facing the death penalty for real.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Andrews is Tom Garrett, a former newspaperman turned author engaged to Susan Spencer (Fontaine), the daughter of his old boss, newspaper publisher Austin Spencer. Austin Spencer is an anti-death penalty activist who at the beginning of the movie has taken Tom to see an execution. Austin springs an idea on Tom: expose the death penalty for an injustice by planting circumstantial evidence suggesting someone is guilty, then reveal the truth after the innocent man is convicted and sentenced to death. The front-page articles about the murder of a local stripper named Patty Gray provide the opportunity Tom and Austin are looking for, and Tom volunteers to set himself up. Tom is convicted as planned, but that's OK, as Austin is ready to clear his name...until ThePlotReaper intervenes, and Tom is facing the death penalty for real.

to:

Andrews is Tom Garrett, a former newspaperman turned author engaged to Susan Spencer (Fontaine), the daughter of his old boss, newspaper publisher Austin Spencer. Austin Spencer is an anti-death penalty activist who at the beginning of the movie has taken Tom to see an execution. Austin springs an idea on Tom: expose the death penalty for an injustice by planting circumstantial evidence suggesting someone is guilty, then reveal the truth after the innocent man is convicted and sentenced to death. The front-page articles about the murder of a local stripper named Patty Gray provide the opportunity Tom and Austin are looking for, and Tom volunteers to set himself up. Tom is convicted as planned, but that's OK, all right, as Austin is ready to clear his name...name... until ThePlotReaper intervenes, and Tom is facing the death penalty for real.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''Beyond a Reasonable Doubt'' is a 1956 film directed by Creator/FritzLang, starring Dana Andrews and Creator/JoanFontaine.

to:

''Beyond a Reasonable Doubt'' is a 1956 film directed by Creator/FritzLang, starring Dana Andrews Creator/DanaAndrews and Creator/JoanFontaine.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GettingCrapPastTheRadar: Tom says he "had to" marry Patty, implying it's because she [[TheBabyTrap claimed to be pregnant]]), something a film wouldn't openly say then. Susan also makes a just barely veiled request for sex.

to:

* GettingCrapPastTheRadar: Tom says he "had to" marry Patty, implying it's because she [[TheBabyTrap claimed to be pregnant]]), pregnant]], something a film wouldn't openly say then. Susan also makes a just barely veiled request for sex.



* HeroInsurance: Well, fine, Tom might have gotten off for the murder, but surely after a long and drawn-out process, not via an instant pardon.
* IdiotBall: Or maybe PlotHole...but since Tom turned out to be guilty after all, why in the name of all that's holy did he agree to this scheme in the first place? Why deliberately implicate yourself in a murder that you actually committed and have gotten away with? Apparently thinking that nobody in their right mind would suspect he ''did'' do it after getting exonerated, but that backfired horribly.

to:

* HeroInsurance: Well, fine, Tom might have gotten off for the murder, but surely after a long and drawn-out process, not via an instant pardon.
pardon. He also could have been charged with fabricating evidence.
* IdiotBall: Or maybe PlotHole...but since Tom turned out to be guilty after all, why in the name of all that's holy did he agree to this scheme in the first place? Why deliberately implicate yourself in a murder that you actually committed and have gotten away with? Apparently thinking that he thought nobody in their right mind would suspect he ''did'' do it after getting exonerated, but that backfired horribly.



* WhatYouAreInTheDark: [[spoiler:Susan outs Tom's guilt to the prosecutor at the very end. Tom walks to his death knowing that Susan betrayed him]].

to:

* WhatYouAreInTheDark: [[spoiler:Susan outs Tom's guilt to the prosecutor at governor near the very end. Tom walks to his death knowing that Susan betrayed him]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GettingCrapPastTheRadar: Susan makes a just barely veiled request for sex.

to:

* GettingCrapPastTheRadar: Tom says he "had to" marry Patty, implying it's because she [[TheBabyTrap claimed to be pregnant]]), something a film wouldn't openly say then. Susan also makes a just barely veiled request for sex.



* IdiotBall: Or maybe PlotHole...but since Tom turned out to be guilty after all, why in the name of all that's holy did he agree to this scheme in the first place? Why deliberately implicate yourself in a murder that you actually committed and have gotten away with?

to:

* IdiotBall: Or maybe PlotHole...but since Tom turned out to be guilty after all, why in the name of all that's holy did he agree to this scheme in the first place? Why deliberately implicate yourself in a murder that you actually committed and have gotten away with?with? Apparently thinking that nobody in their right mind would suspect he ''did'' do it after getting exonerated, but that backfired horribly.



* OfCorsetsSexy: Lots of {{Fanservice}} with Dolly and the other strippers at the burlesque club in their corsets.

to:

* OfCorsetsSexy: Lots of {{Fanservice}} {{fanservice}} with Dolly and the other strippers at the burlesque club in their corsets.



* WrongfulAccusationInsurance: After the exculpatory letter is discovered, charges are dropped and the governor agrees to issue a pardon to let Tom out. Apparently the state has no interest in prosecuting any of the crimes Tom committed as part of his harebrained scheme, like obstruction of justice, falsifying evidence, or interfering with a police investigation.

to:

* WrongfulAccusationInsurance: After the exculpatory letter is discovered, charges are dropped and the governor agrees to issue a pardon to let Tom out. Apparently the state has no interest in prosecuting any of the crimes Tom committed as part of his harebrained scheme, like obstruction of justice, falsifying evidence, or interfering with a police investigation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No Conversation In The Main Page, and he wasn't acquitted, that's kinda the point.


** Not exactly. There still would be a possibility someone tracks and exposes Tom in the future. Some detectives are very persistent, and a marriage usually leaves a trail of various filled papers behind. But being tried and acquitted for Patty's murder, he cannot be retried no matter what (double jeopardy).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* GoneHorriblyRight: Tom's entire plan to frame himself for murder...only to do such a good job that when the key evidence to free him is lost, he faces the death penalty.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I think this is less subjective.


This nasty little FilmNoir was the last film Fritz Lang made in Hollywood. Lang, tired of the studios, left afterwards for his homeland of Germany, having fled ThoseWackyNazis over 20 years before. See the terrible Creator/KevinSpacey movie ''Film/TheLifeOfDavidGale'' for another film with a similar premise. Creator/PeterHyams made a remake in 2009.

to:

This nasty little FilmNoir was the last film Fritz Lang made in Hollywood. Lang, tired of the studios, left afterwards for his homeland of Germany, having fled ThoseWackyNazis over 20 years before. See the terrible critically-panned Creator/KevinSpacey movie ''Film/TheLifeOfDavidGale'' for another film with a similar premise. Creator/PeterHyams made a remake in 2009.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''Beyond a Reasonable Doubt'' is a 1956 film directed by Creator/FritzLang, starring Dana Andrews and Joan Fontaine.

to:

''Beyond a Reasonable Doubt'' is a 1956 film directed by Creator/FritzLang, starring Dana Andrews and Joan Fontaine.Creator/JoanFontaine.

Added: 366

Changed: 137

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HeroInsurance: Well, fine, Tom might have gotten off for the murder, but surely after a long and drawn-out process, not via an instant pardon. And he definitely would have been facing charges and a long prison sentence for obstruction of justice and falsifying evidence and such.

to:

* HeroInsurance: Well, fine, Tom might have gotten off for the murder, but surely after a long and drawn-out process, not via an instant pardon. And he definitely would have been facing charges and a long prison sentence for obstruction of justice and falsifying evidence and such.


Added DiffLines:

* WrongfulAccusationInsurance: After the exculpatory letter is discovered, charges are dropped and the governor agrees to issue a pardon to let Tom out. Apparently the state has no interest in prosecuting any of the crimes Tom committed as part of his harebrained scheme, like obstruction of justice, falsifying evidence, or interfering with a police investigation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''''Beyond a Reasonable Doubt''''' is a 1956 film directed by Creator/FritzLang, starring Dana Andrews and Joan Fontaine.

to:

'''''Beyond ''Beyond a Reasonable Doubt''''' Doubt'' is a 1956 film directed by Creator/FritzLang, starring Dana Andrews and Joan Fontaine.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ZipMeUp: One of the other strippers tries this with Tom, much to Dolly's irritation.

to:

* ZipMeUp: One of the other strippers tries this with Tom, much to Dolly's irritation.irritation.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Not exactly. There still would be a possibility someone tracks and exposes Tom in the future. Some detectives are very persistent, and a marriage usually leaves a trail of various filled papers behind. But being tried and acquitted for Patty's murder, he cannot be retried no matter what (double jeopardy).

Added: 351

Changed: 1834

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''''Beyond a Reasonable Doubt''''' is a 1956 film directed by Creator/FritzLang, starring Dana Andrews and Joan Fontaine. Andrews is Tom Garrett, a former newspaperman turned author engaged to Susan Spencer (Fontaine), the daughter of his old boss, newspaper publisher Austin Spencer. Austin Spencer is an anti-death penalty activist who at the beginning of the movie has taken Tom to see an execution. Austin springs an idea on Tom: expose the death penalty for an injustice by planting circumstantial evidence suggesting someone is guilty, then reveal the truth after the innocent man is convicted and sentenced to death. The front-page articles about the murder of a local stripper named Patty Gray provide the opportunity Tom and Austin are looking for, and Tom volunteers to set himself up. Tom is convicted as planned, but that's OK, as Austin is ready to clear his name...until ThePlotReaper intervenes, and Tom is facing the death penalty for real.

This nasty little film noir was the last film Fritz Lang made in Hollywood. Lang, tired of the studios, left afterwards for his homeland of Germany, having fled ThoseWackyNazis over 20 years before. See the terrible Creator/KevinSpacey movie ''Film/TheLifeOfDavidGale'' for another film with a similar premise. Creator/PeterHyams made a remake in 2009.

to:

'''''Beyond a Reasonable Doubt''''' is a 1956 film directed by Creator/FritzLang, starring Dana Andrews and Joan Fontaine.

Andrews is Tom Garrett, a former newspaperman turned author engaged to Susan Spencer (Fontaine), the daughter of his old boss, newspaper publisher Austin Spencer. Austin Spencer is an anti-death penalty activist who at the beginning of the movie has taken Tom to see an execution. Austin springs an idea on Tom: expose the death penalty for an injustice by planting circumstantial evidence suggesting someone is guilty, then reveal the truth after the innocent man is convicted and sentenced to death. The front-page articles about the murder of a local stripper named Patty Gray provide the opportunity Tom and Austin are looking for, and Tom volunteers to set himself up. Tom is convicted as planned, but that's OK, as Austin is ready to clear his name...until ThePlotReaper intervenes, and Tom is facing the death penalty for real.

This nasty little film noir FilmNoir was the last film Fritz Lang made in Hollywood. Lang, tired of the studios, left afterwards for his homeland of Germany, having fled ThoseWackyNazis over 20 years before. See the terrible Creator/KevinSpacey movie ''Film/TheLifeOfDavidGale'' for another film with a similar premise. Creator/PeterHyams made a remake in 2009.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''Beyond a Reasonable Doubt'' is a 1956 film directed by Creator/FritzLang, starring Dana Andrews and Joan Fontaine. Andrews is Tom Garrett, a former newspaperman turned author engaged to Susan Spencer (Fontaine), the daughter of his old boss, newspaper publisher Austin Spencer. Austin Spencer is an anti-death penalty activist who at the beginning of the movie has taken Tom to see an execution. Austin springs an idea on Tom: expose the death penalty for an injustice by planting circumstantial evidence suggesting someone is guilty, then reveal the truth after the innocent man is convicted and sentenced to death. The front-page articles about the murder of a local stripper named Patty Gray provide the opportunity Tom and Austin are looking for, and Tom volunteers to set himself up. Tom is convicted as planned, but that's OK, as Austin is ready to clear his name...until ThePlotReaper intervenes, and Tom is facing the death penalty for real.

to:

''Beyond '''''Beyond a Reasonable Doubt'' Doubt''''' is a 1956 film directed by Creator/FritzLang, starring Dana Andrews and Joan Fontaine. Andrews is Tom Garrett, a former newspaperman turned author engaged to Susan Spencer (Fontaine), the daughter of his old boss, newspaper publisher Austin Spencer. Austin Spencer is an anti-death penalty activist who at the beginning of the movie has taken Tom to see an execution. Austin springs an idea on Tom: expose the death penalty for an injustice by planting circumstantial evidence suggesting someone is guilty, then reveal the truth after the innocent man is convicted and sentenced to death. The front-page articles about the murder of a local stripper named Patty Gray provide the opportunity Tom and Austin are looking for, and Tom volunteers to set himself up. Tom is convicted as planned, but that's OK, as Austin is ready to clear his name...until ThePlotReaper intervenes, and Tom is facing the death penalty for real.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This nasty little film noir was the last film Fritz Lang made in Hollywood. Lang, tired of the studios, left afterwards for his homeland of Germany. See the terrible Creator/KevinSpacey movie ''Film/TheLifeOfDavidGale'' for another film with a similar premise. Creator/PeterHyams made a remake in 2009.

to:

This nasty little film noir was the last film Fritz Lang made in Hollywood. Lang, tired of the studios, left afterwards for his homeland of Germany.Germany, having fled ThoseWackyNazis over 20 years before. See the terrible Creator/KevinSpacey movie ''Film/TheLifeOfDavidGale'' for another film with a similar premise. Creator/PeterHyams made a remake in 2009.

Added: 114

Removed: 114

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* OfCorsetsSexy: Lots of {{Fanservice}} with Dolly and the other strippers at the burlesque club in their corsets.



* OfCorsetsSexy: Lots of {{Fanservice}} with Dolly and the other strippers at the burlesque club in their corsets.

Added: 281

Removed: 286

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenseLaw: Well, fine, Tom might have gotten off for the murder, but surely after a long and drawn-out process, not via an instant pardon. And he definitely would have been facing charges and a long prison sentence for obstruction of justice and falsifying evidence and such.


Added DiffLines:

* HeroInsurance: Well, fine, Tom might have gotten off for the murder, but surely after a long and drawn-out process, not via an instant pardon. And he definitely would have been facing charges and a long prison sentence for obstruction of justice and falsifying evidence and such.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[quoteright:350:http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/beyond_a_reasonable_doubt.jpg]]

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* WhatYouAreInTheDark: [[spoiler:Susan outs Tom's guilt to the prosecutor at the very end. Tom walks to his death knowing that Susan betrayed him]].

Added: 290

Changed: 43

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This nasty little film noir was the last film Fritz Lang made in Hollywood. Lang, tired of the studios, left afterwards for his homeland of Germany. See the terrible Creator/KevinSpacey movie ''Film/TheLifeOfDavidGale'' for another film with a similar premise.

to:

This nasty little film noir was the last film Fritz Lang made in Hollywood. Lang, tired of the studios, left afterwards for his homeland of Germany. See the terrible Creator/KevinSpacey movie ''Film/TheLifeOfDavidGale'' for another film with a similar premise.
premise. Creator/PeterHyams made a remake in 2009.


Added DiffLines:

* FramingTheGuiltyParty: Tom, who along with Austin goes to great trouble to frame himself--wiping prints from his car, dropping the lighter at the scene, staging a stocking as a purported murder weapon--really did kill Patty Gray, but for a different reason than anyone might have guessed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheKillerInMe: Turns out Tom was guilty all along.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''Beyond a Reasonable Doubt'' is a 1956 film directed by Fritz Lang, starring Dana Andrews and Joan Fontaine. Andrews is Tom Garrett, a former newspaperman turned author engaged to Susan Spencer (Fontaine), the daughter of his old boss, newspaper publisher Austin Spencer. Austin Spencer is an anti-death penalty activist who at the beginning of the movie has taken Tom to see an execution. Austin springs an idea on Tom: expose the death penalty for an injustice by planting circumstantial evidence suggesting someone is guilty, then reveal the truth after the innocent man is convicted and sentenced to death. The front-page articles about the murder of a local stripper named Patty Gray provide the opportunity Tom and Austin are looking for, and Tom volunteers to set himself up. Tom is convicted as planned, but that's OK, as Austin is ready to clear his name...until ThePlotReaper intervenes, and Tom is facing the death penalty for real.

to:

''Beyond a Reasonable Doubt'' is a 1956 film directed by Fritz Lang, Creator/FritzLang, starring Dana Andrews and Joan Fontaine. Andrews is Tom Garrett, a former newspaperman turned author engaged to Susan Spencer (Fontaine), the daughter of his old boss, newspaper publisher Austin Spencer. Austin Spencer is an anti-death penalty activist who at the beginning of the movie has taken Tom to see an execution. Austin springs an idea on Tom: expose the death penalty for an injustice by planting circumstantial evidence suggesting someone is guilty, then reveal the truth after the innocent man is convicted and sentenced to death. The front-page articles about the murder of a local stripper named Patty Gray provide the opportunity Tom and Austin are looking for, and Tom volunteers to set himself up. Tom is convicted as planned, but that's OK, as Austin is ready to clear his name...until ThePlotReaper intervenes, and Tom is facing the death penalty for real.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

''Beyond a Reasonable Doubt'' is a 1956 film directed by Fritz Lang, starring Dana Andrews and Joan Fontaine. Andrews is Tom Garrett, a former newspaperman turned author engaged to Susan Spencer (Fontaine), the daughter of his old boss, newspaper publisher Austin Spencer. Austin Spencer is an anti-death penalty activist who at the beginning of the movie has taken Tom to see an execution. Austin springs an idea on Tom: expose the death penalty for an injustice by planting circumstantial evidence suggesting someone is guilty, then reveal the truth after the innocent man is convicted and sentenced to death. The front-page articles about the murder of a local stripper named Patty Gray provide the opportunity Tom and Austin are looking for, and Tom volunteers to set himself up. Tom is convicted as planned, but that's OK, as Austin is ready to clear his name...until ThePlotReaper intervenes, and Tom is facing the death penalty for real.

This nasty little film noir was the last film Fritz Lang made in Hollywood. Lang, tired of the studios, left afterwards for his homeland of Germany. See the terrible Creator/KevinSpacey movie ''Film/TheLifeOfDavidGale'' for another film with a similar premise.

----
!!Tropes:

* AnswerCut: Austin says of the Patty Gray case "If they haven't gotten a suspect we'll give them one", then we cut to the detective saying "We've got 50 suspects."
* ArtisticLicenseLaw: Well, fine, Tom might have gotten off for the murder, but surely after a long and drawn-out process, not via an instant pardon. And he definitely would have been facing charges and a long prison sentence for obstruction of justice and falsifying evidence and such.
* AuthenticationByNewspaper: When planting the lighter at the scene where Gray's body was found, Tom holds up a newspaper and Austin snaps a photo, to prove he dropped it at a later date.
* {{Burlesque}}: Patty the murder victim was a burlesque dancer. As part of the plan, Tom starts dating Dolly, a voluptuous dancer at the same burlesque club.
* DeadManWriting: Just in the nick of time, the trustee that Austin gave control of his newspaper finds an in-case-of-my-death letter in which Austin explains the scheme.
* DoorClosesEnding: Susan calls the governor as the governor, with pen in hand, is about to sign Tom's pardon. After she tells him the truth, the governor tells the bailiff to lead Tom back to his cell. The last shot is the door to the hallway closing as Tom is taken away.
* EveryCarIsAPinto: Which is a bad thing for both Austin and Tom--bad for Austin because he dies in a fireball after his car is hit by a truck, and bad for Tom because Austin had all the exculpatory photos and documents in his car, where they are burned to a crisp.
* GettingCrapPastTheRadar: Susan makes a just barely veiled request for sex.
--> '''Susan''': But I feel like dancing now.\\
'''Tom''': All right. Where?\\
'''Susan''': I've never seen your apartment.
* GoldDigger: Dolly is a pretty grubby one, describing Tom as "the best score I've made in a long time."
* IdiotBall: Or maybe PlotHole...but since Tom turned out to be guilty after all, why in the name of all that's holy did he agree to this scheme in the first place? Why deliberately implicate yourself in a murder that you actually committed and have gotten away with?
* INeverSaidItWasPoison: Tom and Susan are deliriously happy over Tom's exculpation and imminent pardon, when Tom makes the mistake of wondering who really killed "Emma". Susan picks up on this immediately, noting that this detail, that Patty's real name was Emma Blucher, was never revealed. Tom then admits that Emma Blucher was his wife, and he really did kill her, in order to free himself to marry Susan.
* OopsIForgotIWasMarried: Tom's reason for murdering Emma Blucher. Emma never did file those divorce papers, and she looked Tom up after he hit it big as an author. See INeverSaidItWasPoison above.
* PosthumousCharacter: Patty Gray, dead at the start of the movie and not even seen in flashback, but whose life, back story, and true identity of Emma Blucher is eventually exposed.
* OfCorsetsSexy: Lots of {{Fanservice}} with Dolly and the other strippers at the burlesque club in their corsets.
* TitleDrop: The [[StockLegalPhrases Stock Legal Phrase]] "beyond a reasonable doubt" is dropped by the prosecutor when discussing both the first case and Tom's case.
* TwistEnding: Tom really did kill Patty. See INeverSaidItWasPoison above.
* ZipMeUp: One of the other strippers tries this with Tom, much to Dolly's irritation.

Top