Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Awesome / OverlySarcasticProductions

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In her talk about "Death Personified", Red illustrates Discworld's Death's character arc where he's forced to retire, re-learns the value of life, and is dissatisfied that he's been replaced with a pale imitation with no compassion. As such, he not only defeats his boastful counterpart to retake his mantle, but convinces the [[EldritchAbomination Death of the Universe]] to allow him to keep it. How? By mentioning that the universe ''needs'' Death to recognize the value of life so the harvest is all the more fruitful.
** Death [[DefiedTrope subverting the tragic ending]] of "The Little Match Girl" under the technicality that he's filling in for the spirit of Christmas. Although tragedy teaching gratitude sounds logical on paper, Death recognizes that living another day is a more significant way to appreciate one's future.
** Red being frank that Death isn't something to explain away or stop being sad about. If anything, she acknowledges that Death allows us to feel sad when we need to, and true catharsis is being allowed to process one's emotions.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** At the end, Red notes how, despite Gilgamesh never achieving the immortality he wanted because it could only be gotten through an act of god that the recipient had no hand in, he still got a kind of immortality in the end. 5000 years after his death, his story is still remembered and studied, and every child knows his name. Like Utnapishtim, Gilgamesh was made immortal through no action of his own, but rather an act of God (or rather a long line of Babylonian scribes, Austen Henry Layard, and George Smith) that he had no control over.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* It wouldn't be called "The Epic of Gilgamesh" if it's awesomeness wasn't as long-lasting as its legend.
** The very nature of the stone tablets that contain the legend lasting up until someone was able to study them proper.
** Enkidu And Gilgamesh killing (not one) but '''''two''''' creatures made by the divinities themselves.
** Shamhaut being so beautiful that she tamed Enkidu to become a civilized man in (as Red puts it) a week tops.
** Red's cover of "Hurt" proves not only haunting, but also fitting for the legend she just discussed. If anything, the lyrics could easily apply to any one of these parties: Enkidu for grieving over his being civilized, Gilgamesh for his grieving over his friend, and even the Mesopotamian Gods for how they want to [[TitleDrop hurt]] the abusive king.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In her talk about the PinocchioPlot, Red points out that ironically, such stories are more compelling when the inhuman protagonist '''''[[NotHisSled doesn't]]''''' become human. Making the inhuman protagonist turn human seems to give the shallow implication that looking human is all that defines humanity, not to mention it gives the wrong message that [[BrokenAesop it's better to be like everybody else]]. By subverting that, the story becomes much more compelling for it, because it asks the audience this burning question: ''what'' is the definition of "human"?

to:

* In her talk about the PinocchioPlot, [[BecomeARealBoy Pinocchio Plot]], Red points out that ironically, such stories are more compelling when the inhuman protagonist '''''[[NotHisSled doesn't]]''''' become human. Making the inhuman protagonist turn human seems to give the shallow implication that looking human is all that defines humanity, not to mention it gives the wrong message that [[BrokenAesop it's better to be like everybody else]]. By subverting that, the story becomes much more compelling for it, because it asks the audience this burning question: ''what'' is the definition of "human"?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In her talk about the PinocchioPlot, Red points out that ironically, such stories are more compelling when the inhuman protagonist '''''[[NotHisSled doesn't]]''''' become human. Making the inhuman protagonist turn human seems to give the shallow implication that looking human is all that defines humanity, not to mention it gives the wrong message that [[BrokenAesop it's better to be like everybody else]]. By subverting that, the story becomes much more compelling for it, because it asks the audience this burning question: ''what'' is the definition of "human"?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The story of Io ends with a much-deserved EarnYourHappyEnding, as Io is returned to her human form, marries the Egyptian king Telegonus, is worshipped as a goddess, mothers the line that will eventually spawn Heracles, and [[DidYouJustFlipOffCthulhu flips Zeus the bird]]. And to hammer the point home, the ending song is Gloria Gaynor's ''I Will Survive''.
-->''And you see me, somebody new\\
I'm not that chained up little person\\
still in love with you\\
And so you felt like dropping in\\
And just expect me to be free\\
But now I'm saving all my lovin'\\
for someone who's loving me!''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the [[DealWithTheDevil Faustian Bargain]] talk, Red takes a section to discuss [[DidYouJustScamCthulhu characters who outsmart the devil]]. The example used is [[Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica Madoka gaming the system and beating Kyubey at his own game]].

to:

* In the [[DealWithTheDevil Faustian Bargain]] talk, Red takes a section to discuss [[DidYouJustScamCthulhu characters who outsmart the devil]]. devil]], arguing that in cases where a villain does it it comes across as KarmaHoudini, but if the person who made the deal are a genuinely innocent or at least good person who got duped or forced into the deal, then it instead becomes phenomenally satisfying to see them outwit the true villain of the story. The example used playing on the screen is [[Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica Madoka gaming Kaname turning the system Incubator's own rules against him and beating Kyubey at his own game]].becoming a god]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In the [[DealWithTheDevil Faustian Bargain]] talk, Red takes a section to discuss [[DidYouJustScamCthulhu characters who outsmart the devil]]. The example used is [[Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica Madoka gaming the system and beating Kyubey at his own game]].

Added: 75

Changed: 15

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Further, Fionn is able to tank ''twenty-nine simultaneous right hooks.''



* '''"The Trojan War"'''! The entirety of it feels like a reboot of Red's video on the Illiad, one with richer illustrations, more in-depth lore (such as how Odysseus was strong-armed to go to war) and a deeper look into the different variations it was told.

to:

* '''"The Trojan War"'''! The entirety of it feels like a reboot of Red's video on the Illiad, Iliad, one with richer illustrations, more in-depth lore (such as how Odysseus was strong-armed to go to war) and a deeper look into the different variations it was told.



** Penthesillia, being an Amazonian demigoddess princess of Ares who's so stalwart and brave that she's the original girl-power trope who inspired the on-looking women on the war.
*** On that note, when Achilles kills Penthesillia amidst the war, he can't help but fall in love with her beauty and feel really bad about the life they could've lead under different circumstances. What does he do when Thersites starts to [[KickTheDog mock and taunt him for being "girly"]]? Give him a OffHandBackhand '''so hard''', it likely bashes in his brains and kills him.

to:

** Penthesillia, Penthesilea, being an Amazonian demigoddess princess of Ares who's so stalwart and brave that she's the original girl-power trope who inspired the on-looking women on the war.
*** On that note, when Achilles kills Penthesillia Penthesilea amidst the war, he can't help but fall in love with her beauty and feel really bad about the life they could've lead under different circumstances. What does he do when Thersites starts to [[KickTheDog mock and taunt him for being "girly"]]? Give him a OffHandBackhand '''so hard''', it likely bashes in his brains and kills him.



** Paris's ''humiliating'' death by Philoctetes' poison arrows, one of which hits him in the member. But the bad day gets worse when he tries to plead to the nympth Oenone, his [[WhamLine real wife]], to heal him. Her next line sums up that Hell indeed has no fury like a woman scorned, as she gives him a sick burn that possibly hurt almost as badly as the poison.

to:

** Paris's ''humiliating'' death by Philoctetes' poison arrows, one of which hits him in the member. But the bad day gets worse when he tries to plead to the nympth nymph Oenone, his [[WhamLine real wife]], to heal him. Her next line sums up that Hell indeed has no fury like a woman scorned, as she gives him a sick burn that possibly hurt almost as badly as the poison.



** The legal system at the time, administered by the Allthing, is generally depicted as a very ReasonableAuthorityFigure, in contrast to most legal authorities in the myths Red recounts. They make Grettir an outlaw and exile twice, but never without just cause, and even refuse to outlaw him for more than 20 years, having set it as a legal limit on exiles. Having Grettir exiled in absentia was, according to Red, considered fairly inapproriate, as it didn't give him the chance to defend himself. Even Red notes that the Wergild system is, while morbid, very pragmatic.

to:

** The legal system at the time, administered by the Allthing, is generally depicted as a very ReasonableAuthorityFigure, in contrast to most legal authorities in the myths Red recounts. They make Grettir an outlaw and exile twice, but never without just cause, and even refuse to outlaw him for more than 20 years, having set it as a legal limit on exiles. Having Grettir exiled in absentia was, according to Red, considered fairly inapproriate, inappropriate, as it didn't give him the chance to defend himself. Even Red notes that the Wergild system is, while morbid, very pragmatic.



-->'''Red:''' Hope is the ultimate motivator. On some level, it's the ''only'' motivator. If it seems like I have personal beef with Grimdark as a genre, it's only the same beef I have with ''everything'' that [[SillyRabbitIdealismIsForKids treats hope like a dumb childish concept rather than the fundamental core of human experience]]. Hope makes us ''believe'' things can be better. Once we stop believing that, we ''stop trying'' to make things better--and guess what? Then things ''don't'' get better! Pessimisstic nihilism is the ultimate self-fulfilling prophecy, and maybe it's the 2020 talking but ''man'' I have straight-up run out of patience with people who give up on a better world and then have the ''audacity'' to tell other people that they're naive or stupid for still trying.

to:

-->'''Red:''' Hope is the ultimate motivator. On some level, it's the ''only'' motivator. If it seems like I have personal beef with Grimdark as a genre, it's only the same beef I have with ''everything'' that [[SillyRabbitIdealismIsForKids treats hope like a dumb childish concept rather than the fundamental core of human experience]]. Hope makes us ''believe'' things can be better. Once we stop believing that, we ''stop trying'' to make things better--and guess what? Then things ''don't'' get better! Pessimisstic Pessimistic nihilism is the ultimate self-fulfilling prophecy, and maybe it's the 2020 talking but ''man'' I have straight-up run out of patience with people who give up on a better world and then have the ''audacity'' to tell other people that they're naive or stupid for still trying.



*** The second one is {{ComicBook/Invincible}}, which they note has a very clever twist to the seemingly surface-level appearence of the SupermanSubstitute - Omni-Man ''isn't'' the Superman substitute in this scenario, he's Jor-El, and Mark/Invincible is Clark/Superman, not necessarily because he's as physically invincible as his namesake implies (he's far from it), but because he has Superman's unbreakable will and moral code.

to:

*** The second one is {{ComicBook/Invincible}}, which they note has a very clever twist to the seemingly surface-level appearence appearance of the SupermanSubstitute - Omni-Man ''isn't'' the Superman substitute in this scenario, he's Jor-El, and Mark/Invincible is Clark/Superman, not necessarily because he's as physically invincible as his namesake implies (he's far from it), but because he has Superman's unbreakable will and moral code.



* The performance of Shakespeare's [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdxePMF2zkM Julius Ceasar]] features Noir speaking all of Ceasar's lines in ''fluent Latin''. Sure, it's hilarious when he says the only Latin line in English, but his performance delights Blue so much that he remarks "I've died before I've even said a singe line".

to:

* The performance of Shakespeare's [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdxePMF2zkM Julius Ceasar]] features Noir speaking all of Ceasar's Caesar's lines in ''fluent Latin''. Sure, it's hilarious when he says the only Latin line in English, but his performance delights Blue so much that he remarks "I've died before I've even said a singe single line".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No meta moment, see this query.


* A meta-example from the [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRCt8mCtXdo Ancient Greek Post-Apocalypse video]]. One of the comments mentions attending Harvard University and taking a course on [[Myth/ClassicalMythology Classical Mythology]], with the professor being "one of the forerunners of Classical studies in the world." According to them, said professor has added the channel's videos of the Illiad, the Odyssey, and the Aneid to their syllabus. Furthermore, OSP is apparently the ''only channel in all of [[Website/YouTube YouTube]]'' provided by Harvard that has been approved for accuracy and entertainment, and the syllabus is constantly updated to accommodate more of their videos. If that doesn't speak volume to the quality and care Red and Blue put into their videos, nothing will.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* "Shippeitaro" features the titular dog and the nameless protagonist fighting and defeating the demon cat of the mountain. Sure, Shippeitaro got most of the credit and was the demon cat's main weakness, but props to the young man for having the guts and bravery to commit to his plan and ''decapitate the demon cat with a single blow of his sword''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added a link to the video in question.


* A meta-example from the Ancient Greek Post-Apocalypse video. One of the comments mentions attending Harvard University and taking a course on [[Myth/ClassicalMythology Classical Mythology]], with the professor being "one of the forerunners of Classical studies in the world." According to them, said professor has added the channel's videos of the Illiad, the Odyssey, and the Aneid to their syllabus. Furthermore, OSP is apparently the ''only channel in all of [[Website/YouTube YouTube]]'' provided by Harvard that has been approved for accuracy and entertainment, and the syllabus is constantly updated to accommodate more of their videos. If that doesn't speak volume to the quality and care Red and Blue put into their videos, nothing will.

to:

* A meta-example from the [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRCt8mCtXdo Ancient Greek Post-Apocalypse video.video]]. One of the comments mentions attending Harvard University and taking a course on [[Myth/ClassicalMythology Classical Mythology]], with the professor being "one of the forerunners of Classical studies in the world." According to them, said professor has added the channel's videos of the Illiad, the Odyssey, and the Aneid to their syllabus. Furthermore, OSP is apparently the ''only channel in all of [[Website/YouTube YouTube]]'' provided by Harvard that has been approved for accuracy and entertainment, and the syllabus is constantly updated to accommodate more of their videos. If that doesn't speak volume to the quality and care Red and Blue put into their videos, nothing will.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*A meta-example from the Ancient Greek Post-Apocalypse video. One of the comments mentions attending Harvard University and taking a course on [[Myth/ClassicalMythology Classical Mythology]], with the professor being "one of the forerunners of Classical studies in the world." According to them, said professor has added the channel's videos of the Illiad, the Odyssey, and the Aneid to their syllabus. Furthermore, OSP is apparently the ''only channel in all of [[Website/YouTube YouTube]]'' provided by Harvard that has been approved for accuracy and entertainment, and the syllabus is constantly updated to accommodate more of their videos. If that doesn't speak volume to the quality and care Red and Blue put into their videos, nothing will.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:Livestreams]]
* The performance of Shakespeare's [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdxePMF2zkM Julius Ceasar]] features Noir speaking all of Ceasar's lines in ''fluent Latin''. Sure, it's hilarious when he says the only Latin line in English, but his performance delights Blue so much that he remarks "I've died before I've even said a singe line".
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Two of the three given examples are from Creator/AlanMoore, who they note fundamentally understands Superman. Red and Blue argue that Moore is a really good writer whose work is [[MisaimedFandom catastrophically misunderstood by less skilled writers who tend to only see the surface-level cynical aspects of his work]] . The hosts say that this is especially true of {{ComicBook/Watchmen}}, making the case that ''Watchmen'' isn't a story about an apathetic version of Superman (in the form of Dr. Manhattan, who they note is actually an {{Expy}} of Captain Atom, not Superman), but rather a world without Superman as an inspiration and a bar for heroes to strive to clear. Thus, without Superman as the correcting influence who is always the moral standard and is always self-sacrificing to do the right thing, the heroes break over time.

to:

** Two of the three given examples are from Creator/AlanMoore, who they note fundamentally understands Superman. Red and Blue argue that Moore is a really good writer whose work is [[MisaimedFandom catastrophically misunderstood by less skilled writers who tend to only see the surface-level cynical aspects of his work]] . The hosts say that this is especially true of {{ComicBook/Watchmen}}, ''{{ComicBook/Watchmen}}'', making the case that ''Watchmen'' isn't a story about an apathetic version of Superman (in the form of Dr. Manhattan, who they note is actually an {{Expy}} of Captain Atom, not Superman), but rather a world without Superman as an inspiration and a bar for heroes to strive to clear. Thus, without Superman as the correcting influence who is always the moral standard and is always self-sacrificing to do the right thing, the heroes break over time.



** They basically end the diatribe with a KirkSummation that [[SillyRabbitCynicismIsForLosers caring is a genuinely good thing and the world isn't and shouldn't just be bad and miserable, and we always should be striving for a better world and to hold bad actors accountable, because to give into cynicism and not do anything about bad things is cause a]] SelfFulfillingProphecy to happen. They argue that, if anything, in the 2020s, we need TheParagon character of Superman ''now more than ever before'' to remind us of this fact.

to:

** They basically end the diatribe with a KirkSummation that [[SillyRabbitCynicismIsForLosers caring is a genuinely good thing and the world isn't and shouldn't just be bad and miserable, and we always should be striving for a better world and to hold bad actors accountable, because to give into cynicism and not do anything about bad things is cause a]] SelfFulfillingProphecy to happen. They argue that, if anything, in the 2020s, we need TheParagon character of Superman ''now now more than ever before'' to remind us of this fact.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_50968MO0PU "Satirizing Superman"]] basically is an amazing hour and a half long analysis of Superman from his very origins as a character, and generally what makes him tick and his role both inside his stories and as part of the greater meta-versal superhero ecosystem, along with the best examples of {{ComicBook/Superman}} at his finest - specifically, ComicBook/WhateverHappenedToTheManOfTomorrow, WesternAnimation/SupermanVsTheElite (aka ComicBook/WhatsSoFunnyAboutTruthJusticeAndTheAmericanWay) and ComicBook/ForTheManWhoHasEverything (and its WesternAnimation/JusticeLeagueUnlimited [[Recap/JusticeLeagueUnlimitedS1E2ForTheManWhoHasEverything adaptation]]).
** Two of the three given examples are from Creator/AlanMoore, who they note ''fundamentally understands Superman'' and they note that Moore is basically a really good writer whose work is ''so catastrophically systemically and chronically misunderstood'' by less skilled writers who tend to only see the surface-level cynical aspects of his work and completely misunderstand it, ''especially'' {{ComicBook/Watchmen}}, making the case that ''Watchmen'' isn't a story partly about an apathetic version of Superman (in the form of Dr. Manhattan, who they note is actually an {{Expy}} of ''Captain Atom'', not Superman) but rather ''a world without Superman as an inspiration and a bar for heroes to strive to clear'', and without that correcting influence who is always the moral standard and is always self-sacrificing to do the right thing, the heroes break over time.
** Their counterpoint to "how can Superman see people as anything other than insects?" is to point to ''"For the Man Who Has Everything"'' and highlight that even in a dream world with people ''he knows literally are not real'', he ''still acts with heartbreaking compassion and humanity''. And his true wish is to live a normal, happy live with a family of his own, even without superpowers.

to:

* [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_50968MO0PU "Satirizing Superman"]] basically is Superman"]]is an amazing hour and a half long 90-minute analysis of Superman ComicBook/{{Superman}}, from his very origins as a character, and generally character to what makes him tick tick, and his role both inside his stories and as part of the greater meta-versal superhero ecosystem, along with ecosystem. Red and Blue take a look at the best examples of {{ComicBook/Superman}} at his finest - specifically, ComicBook/WhateverHappenedToTheManOfTomorrow, WesternAnimation/SupermanVsTheElite ''ComicBook/WhateverHappenedToTheManOfTomorrow'', ''WesternAnimation/SupermanVsTheElite'' (aka ComicBook/WhatsSoFunnyAboutTruthJusticeAndTheAmericanWay) ''ComicBook/WhatsSoFunnyAboutTruthJusticeAndTheAmericanWay'') and ComicBook/ForTheManWhoHasEverything ''ComicBook/ForTheManWhoHasEverything'' (and its WesternAnimation/JusticeLeagueUnlimited [[Recap/JusticeLeagueUnlimitedS1E2ForTheManWhoHasEverything adaptation]]).
** Two of the three given examples are from Creator/AlanMoore, who they note ''fundamentally fundamentally understands Superman'' Superman. Red and they note Blue argue that Moore is basically a really good writer whose work is ''so [[MisaimedFandom catastrophically systemically and chronically misunderstood'' misunderstood by less skilled writers who tend to only see the surface-level cynical aspects of his work and completely misunderstand it, ''especially'' work]] . The hosts say that this is especially true of {{ComicBook/Watchmen}}, making the case that ''Watchmen'' isn't a story partly about an apathetic version of Superman (in the form of Dr. Manhattan, who they note is actually an {{Expy}} of ''Captain Atom'', Captain Atom, not Superman) Superman), but rather ''a a world without Superman as an inspiration and a bar for heroes to strive to clear'', and clear. Thus, without that Superman as the correcting influence who is always the moral standard and is always self-sacrificing to do the right thing, the heroes break over time.
** Their counterpoint to "how can Superman see people as anything other than insects?" is to point to ''"For ''For the Man Who Has Everything"'' Everything''. Red and Blue highlight that even in a dream world with people ''he he knows literally are not real'', he ''still real, and in a world where no one else would ever know what he's seeing, [[WhatYouAreInTheDark Superman still acts with heartbreaking compassion and humanity''.humanity]]. And his true wish is to live a normal, happy live with a family of his own, even without superpowers.



** And lastly, ''"Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow?"'' demonstrates that Superman ultimately holds ''himself'' accountable for his actions, because if he doesn't, who else will? Which is why in the end when he kills Mxyzptlk, he uses Gold Kryptonite to depower himself, despite the fact that he had ''absolutely no choice otherwise but to take the life of an immortal fifth-dimensional being who just announced he'll spend the next two-thousand years being evil''. They also again highlight (along with the above ''Justice League Unlimited'' episode and the episode "Comfort and Joy") that it's proof that ultimately Superman is the mask that Clark Kent wears, not the other way around, and that Clark doesn't see himself as a god above other people, but instead is a good old country boy from Kansas [[IJustWantToBeNormal who just wants to live a normal life]] and is just doing the right thing, and uses Superman as his "customer service voice".

to:

** And lastly, ''"Whatever ''Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow?"'' Tomorrow?'' demonstrates that Superman ultimately holds ''himself'' himself accountable for his actions, because if he doesn't, who else will? Which is why in the end when he kills Mxyzptlk, he Superman uses Gold Kryptonite to depower himself, despite the fact that he had ''absolutely absolutely no choice otherwise but to take the life of an immortal fifth-dimensional being who just announced he'll spend the next two-thousand years being evil''.evil. They also again highlight (along with the above ''Justice League Unlimited'' episode and the episode "Comfort and Joy") that it's proof that ultimately Superman is the mask that Clark Kent wears, not the other way around, and that Clark doesn't see himself as a god above other people, but instead is a good old country boy from Kansas [[IJustWantToBeNormal who just wants to live a normal life]] and is just doing the right thing, and uses Superman as his "customer service voice".



** They highlight that deconstructions/satirizations do deserve to exist and not everyone can or should like everything, but at the same time the ones that aren't merely a ShallowParody are from people who genuinely ''understand'' how Superman works.
*** The first good example they cite is {{ComicBook/Irredeemable}}, with Red highlighting that it isn't a shallow parody, instead exploring a Superman-esque figure who started out wrong from the outset and never got the proper care growing up like Clark did with the Kents, and how the Plutonian simply did not have the psychological fortitude to handle his super senses and be able to take criticism.
*** The second one is {{ComicBook/Invincible}}, which they note has a very clever twist to the seemingly surface-level appearence of the SupermanSubstitute - Omni-Man ''isn't'' the Superman substitute in this scenario, he's ''Jor-El'', and ''Mark/Invincible is Clark/Superman'', not necessarily because he's as physically invincible as his namesake implies (he's far from it) but in reality he has Superman's unbreakable will and moral code.
** Superman's metatextural role as the character for all heroes to aspire to be, in and out of the DC universe, is also partly why they believe the Franchise/DCExtendedUniverse was floundering for a good while - there's not as much ''contrast'' between the heroic characters, and a miserable, darker and edgier Superman doesn't fill the role of TheParagon to compare and contrast with other darker and more cynical characters. Without that paragon to compare and contrast to and for other characters to bounce off of and interact with, everyone is much less interesting. Superman and Batman's OddFriendship works precisely because of this contrast. Red also highlights that she doesn't think Creator/ZackSnyder should be doing superhero movies and especially not Superman, because the man has admitted ''he doesn't like comic books unless people are having sex and killing each other all the time'' and that he simply doesn't ''get'' what Superman is about because he's too cynical to understand.

to:

** They highlight that deconstructions/satirizations do deserve to exist and not everyone can or should like everything, but at the same time the ones that aren't merely a ShallowParody are from people who genuinely ''understand'' understand how Superman works.
*** The first good example they cite is {{ComicBook/Irredeemable}}, ''{{ComicBook/Irredeemable}}'', with Red highlighting that it isn't a shallow parody, instead exploring a Superman-esque figure who started out wrong from the outset and never got the proper care growing up like Clark did with the Kents, and how the Plutonian simply did not have the psychological fortitude to handle his super senses and be able to take criticism.
*** The second one is {{ComicBook/Invincible}}, which they note has a very clever twist to the seemingly surface-level appearence of the SupermanSubstitute - Omni-Man ''isn't'' the Superman substitute in this scenario, he's ''Jor-El'', Jor-El, and ''Mark/Invincible Mark/Invincible is Clark/Superman'', Clark/Superman, not necessarily because he's as physically invincible as his namesake implies (he's far from it) it), but in reality because he has Superman's unbreakable will and moral code.
** Superman's metatextural role as the character for all heroes to aspire to be, in and out of the DC universe, is also partly why they believe the Franchise/DCExtendedUniverse was floundering for a good while - there's not as much ''contrast'' between the heroic characters, and characters. And a miserable, darker and edgier Superman doesn't fill the role of TheParagon to compare and contrast with other darker and more cynical characters. Without that paragon to compare and contrast to and for other characters to bounce off of and interact with, everyone is much less interesting. Superman and Batman's OddFriendship works precisely because of this contrast. Red also highlights that she doesn't think Creator/ZackSnyder should be doing superhero movies and especially not Superman, because the man has admitted ''he he doesn't like comic books unless people are having sex and killing each other all the time'' time and that he simply doesn't ''get'' get what Superman is about because he's too cynical to understand.about.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Red gives a rhetorical '''[[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech demolishing]]''' of Heinrich Kramer, author of the ''Literature/MalleusMaleficarum'', by revealing his actual reasons for making it. Effectively, Kramer wrote an angry hateblog aimed at a woman named Helena Scheuberin who dared to wound his ego in 1485 by calling Kramer a terrible preacher. As a result, Kramer tried to have Scheuberin and six other women [[BurnTheWitch burned at the stake under the pretense that they were witches]], but it was actually because they didn't want to go to his sermons and Kramer's pride was hurt. Even the judge from the Spanish Inquisition who presided over the case [[EveryoneHasStandards told Kramer he was paranoid and making claims that were obviously false]]. Eventually, even the Inquisition got sick of Kramer and exiled him. The whole time, Red is painting Kramer as nothing more than a pathetic little bully who started a fearmongering against all women to salvage his injured pride.

to:

** Red gives a rhetorical '''[[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech demolishing]]''' of Heinrich Kramer, author of the ''Literature/MalleusMaleficarum'', by revealing his actual reasons for making it. Effectively, Kramer wrote an angry hateblog aimed at a woman named Helena Scheuberin who dared to wound his ego in 1485 by calling Kramer a terrible preacher. As a result, Kramer tried to have Scheuberin and six other women [[BurnTheWitch burned at the stake under the pretense that they were witches]], but it was actually because they didn't want to go to his sermons and Kramer's pride was hurt. Even the judge from the Spanish Inquisition who presided over the case [[EveryoneHasStandards told Kramer he was paranoid and making claims that were obviously false]]. Eventually, even the Inquisition got sick of Kramer and exiled him. The whole time, Red is painting Kramer as nothing more than a pathetic little bully who started a fearmongering fear mongering campaign against all women to salvage his injured pride.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In her video on werewolves, Red gives an utter rhetorical '''[[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech demolishing]]''' of Heinrich Kramer, author of the ''Literature/MalleusMaleficarum'', by revealing his actual reasons for making it. Effectively, Kramer wrote an angry hateblog aimed at a woman named Helena Scheuberin who dared to wound his ego in 1485 by calling Kramer a terrible preacher. As a result, Kramer tried to have Scheuberin and six other women [[BurnTheWitch burned at the stake under the pretense that they were witches]], but it was actually because they didn't want to go to his sermons and Kramer's pride was hurt. Even the judge from the Spanish Inquisition who presided over the case [[EveryoneHasStandards told Kramer he was paranoid and making claims that were obviously false]]. Eventually, even the Inquisition got sick of Kramer and exiled him. The whole time, Red is painting Kramer as nothing more than a pathetic little bully who started a fearmongering against all women to salvage his injured pride.

to:

** In her video on werewolves, Red gives an utter a rhetorical '''[[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech demolishing]]''' of Heinrich Kramer, author of the ''Literature/MalleusMaleficarum'', by revealing his actual reasons for making it. Effectively, Kramer wrote an angry hateblog aimed at a woman named Helena Scheuberin who dared to wound his ego in 1485 by calling Kramer a terrible preacher. As a result, Kramer tried to have Scheuberin and six other women [[BurnTheWitch burned at the stake under the pretense that they were witches]], but it was actually because they didn't want to go to his sermons and Kramer's pride was hurt. Even the judge from the Spanish Inquisition who presided over the case [[EveryoneHasStandards told Kramer he was paranoid and making claims that were obviously false]]. Eventually, even the Inquisition got sick of Kramer and exiled him. The whole time, Red is painting Kramer as nothing more than a pathetic little bully who started a fearmongering against all women to salvage his injured pride.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The utter rhetorical '''[[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech demolishing]]''' of Heinrich Kramer, author of the ''Literature/MalleusMaleficarum'', by revealing his actual reasons for making it. Effectively, Kramer wrote an angry hateblog aimed at a woman who dared to wound his ego by calling Kramer a terrible preacher. And after he tried to have her burned at the stake, the Inquisition itself [[EveryoneHasStandards told him he was paranoid]]. Eventually, even the Inquisition got sick of Kramer and exiled him. The whole time, Red is painting Kramer as nothing more than a pathetic little bully who started a fearmongering against all women to salvage his injured pride.

to:

** The In her video on werewolves, Red gives an utter rhetorical '''[[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech demolishing]]''' of Heinrich Kramer, author of the ''Literature/MalleusMaleficarum'', by revealing his actual reasons for making it. Effectively, Kramer wrote an angry hateblog aimed at a woman named Helena Scheuberin who dared to wound his ego in 1485 by calling Kramer a terrible preacher. And after he As a result, Kramer tried to have her Scheuberin and six other women [[BurnTheWitch burned at the stake, stake under the pretense that they were witches]], but it was actually because they didn't want to go to his sermons and Kramer's pride was hurt. Even the judge from the Spanish Inquisition itself who presided over the case [[EveryoneHasStandards told him Kramer he was paranoid]].paranoid and making claims that were obviously false]]. Eventually, even the Inquisition got sick of Kramer and exiled him. The whole time, Red is painting Kramer as nothing more than a pathetic little bully who started a fearmongering against all women to salvage his injured pride.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[folder: Miscellaneous Myths]]

to:

[[folder: Miscellaneous [[folder:Miscellaneous Myths]]



[[folder: Red and Blue talking at incredible speeds]]

to:

[[folder: Red [[folder:Red and Blue talking at incredible speeds]]



** It must be said, however, that Blue had to artificially speed up his speech as evidenced by the audio artifacting scattered throughout the video, meaning he didn't actually speak quite that fast. Red's rendition of the ''Literature/{{Mahabharata}}'' has no such artifacting caused by artificially speeding it up.

to:

** It must be said, however, that Blue had to artificially speed up his speech as evidenced by the audio artifacting scattered throughout the video, meaning he didn't actually speak quite that fast. Red's rendition of the ''Literature/{{Mahabharata}}'' has no such artifacting caused by artificially speeding it up.up, meaning she really was talking that fast.



[[folder: Detail Diatribe]]

to:

[[folder: Detail [[folder:Detail Diatribe]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The utter rhetorical '''[[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech demolishing]]''' of Heinrich Kramer, author of the ''Literature/MalleusMaleficarum'', by revealing his ''actual'' reasons for making it - effectively an angry hateblog aimed at a woman who dared to wound his ego by pointing out he was a ''terrible'' preacher, and after he tried to have her burned at the stake, the Inquisition itself ''[[EveryoneHasStandards told him he was a paranoid]]'', eventually outright exiling him as a frankly ''pathetic'' little bully who did nothing except fearmonger to salve his injured pride.

to:

** The utter rhetorical '''[[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech demolishing]]''' of Heinrich Kramer, author of the ''Literature/MalleusMaleficarum'', by revealing his ''actual'' actual reasons for making it - effectively it. Effectively, Kramer wrote an angry hateblog aimed at a woman who dared to wound his ego by pointing out he was calling Kramer a ''terrible'' preacher, and terrible preacher. And after he tried to have her burned at the stake, the Inquisition itself ''[[EveryoneHasStandards [[EveryoneHasStandards told him he was a paranoid]]'', eventually outright exiling him paranoid]]. Eventually, even the Inquisition got sick of Kramer and exiled him. The whole time, Red is painting Kramer as nothing more than a frankly ''pathetic'' pathetic little bully who did nothing except fearmonger started a fearmongering against all women to salve salvage his injured pride.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In part X, Sun Wukong finally finds his match; [[MirrorMatch an imposter disguised as himself]]. What happens when two shapeshifting, immortal, ungodly powerful beings fight? Red describes it as a BigBallOfViolence that goes all across the world, heaven, ''and'' the underworld looking for anyone who can SpotTheImposter. And everywhere they go, no one wants to untangle ''that'' in their home out of fear of retribution from the imposter as he can clearly match [[TheDreaded Sun Wukong]], and keeping the two Monkeys fighting [[SealedEvilInADuel at least gives them a target that isn't anyone else]].
--> '''Red:''' See, the problem is: The identity may be false, but the power is ''real'', the false Monkey is ''actually'' as strong as the real one, and if he were revealed here he might absolutely demolish the underworld in retribution.
--> '''[[TheNoseKnows Di Ting]]:''' We are in '''very''' real danger, and the truth '''will''' destroy us.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Becomes rather poignant later on in a live tweet thread of ''Zack Snyder's Justice League'', in which the considerably more idealistic film is received rather warmly by Red and stands in sharp contrast to its much darker predecessors. Particularly in its portrayal of Superman as being far more gentle, optimistic and generally the [[HopeBringer uplifting hero he's meant to be]].

to:

*** Becomes rather poignant later on in a light of Red's live tweet thread tweeting of ''Zack Snyder's Justice League'', in which the considerably more idealistic film is received rather warmly by Red and stands in sharp contrast to its much darker predecessors. Particularly in its portrayal of Superman as being far more gentle, optimistic and generally the [[HopeBringer uplifting hero he's meant to be]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
As Red had some rather nice things to say in her live tweeting on ZSJL, I think it's worth mentioning. Particularly as Zack Snyder has matured as a fan of superheroes since his rather sophomoric comments on the subject years ago.

Added DiffLines:

*** Becomes rather poignant later on in a live tweet thread of ''Zack Snyder's Justice League'', in which the considerably more idealistic film is received rather warmly by Red and stands in sharp contrast to its much darker predecessors. Particularly in its portrayal of Superman as being far more gentle, optimistic and generally the [[HopeBringer uplifting hero he's meant to be]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_50968MO0PU "Satarizing Superman"]] basically is an amazing hour and a half long analysis of Superman from his very origins as a character, and generally what makes him tick and his role both inside his stories and as part of the greater meta-versal superhero ecosystem, along with the best examples of {{ComicBook/Superman}} at his finest - specifically, ComicBook/WhateverHappenedToTheManOfTomorrow, WesternAnimation/SupermanVsTheElite (aka ComicBook/WhatsSoFunnyAboutTruthJusticeAndTheAmericanWay) and ComicBook/ForTheManWhoHasEverything (and its WesternAnimation/JusticeLeagueUnlimited [[Recap/JusticeLeagueUnlimitedS1E2ForTheManWhoHasEverything adaptation]]).

to:

* [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_50968MO0PU "Satarizing "Satirizing Superman"]] basically is an amazing hour and a half long analysis of Superman from his very origins as a character, and generally what makes him tick and his role both inside his stories and as part of the greater meta-versal superhero ecosystem, along with the best examples of {{ComicBook/Superman}} at his finest - specifically, ComicBook/WhateverHappenedToTheManOfTomorrow, WesternAnimation/SupermanVsTheElite (aka ComicBook/WhatsSoFunnyAboutTruthJusticeAndTheAmericanWay) and ComicBook/ForTheManWhoHasEverything (and its WesternAnimation/JusticeLeagueUnlimited [[Recap/JusticeLeagueUnlimitedS1E2ForTheManWhoHasEverything adaptation]]).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Wording correction


** At the same time, Red does not shy away from portraying Hades as something ''other'' than a flawed character, as he ''did'' trick Persephone into eating those pomegranate seeds out of fear he'd never see her again. The other Greek Gods already get more than enough glossing over, and she's not about to start with Hades.

to:

** At the same time, Red does not shy away from portraying Hades as something ''other'' than a flawed character, as he ''did'' trick Persephone into eating those pomegranate seeds out of fear he'd never see her again. The other Greek Gods already get more than enough glossing over, and she's not about to start with Hades.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** A relatively smaller one, but the fact that a simple little old witch managed to do (via a powerful log curse) what everyone else has failed to do: take down Grettir in one fell swoop.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The legal system at the time, administered by the Allthing, is generally depicted as a very ReasonableAuthorityFigure, in contrast to most legal authorities in the myths Red recounts. They make Grettir an outlaw and exile twice, but never without just cause, and even refuse to outlaw him for more than 20 years, having set it as a legal limit on exiles. Even Red notes that the Wergild system is, while morbid, very pragmatic.

to:

** The legal system at the time, administered by the Allthing, is generally depicted as a very ReasonableAuthorityFigure, in contrast to most legal authorities in the myths Red recounts. They make Grettir an outlaw and exile twice, but never without just cause, and even refuse to outlaw him for more than 20 years, having set it as a legal limit on exiles. Having Grettir exiled in absentia was, according to Red, considered fairly inapproriate, as it didn't give him the chance to defend himself. Even Red notes that the Wergild system is, while morbid, very pragmatic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The Saga of Grettir.
** The legal system at the time, administered by the Allthing, is generally depicted as a very ReasonableAuthorityFigure, in contrast to most legal authorities in the myths Red recounts. They make Grettir an outlaw and exile twice, but never without just cause, and even refuse to outlaw him for more than 20 years, having set it as a legal limit on exiles. Even Red notes that the Wergild system is, while morbid, very pragmatic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The utter rhetorical '''[[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech demolishing]]''' of Heinrich Kramer, author of the ''Literature/MalleusMaleficarum'', by revealing his ''actual'' reasons for making it - effectively an angry hateblog aimed at a woman who dared to wound his ego by pointing out he was a ''terrible'' preacher, and after he tried to burn her at the stake, the Inquisition itself ''[[EveryoneHasStandards told him he was a paranoid,]]'' eventually outright exiling him as a frankly ''pathetic'' little bully who did nothing except fearmonger to salve his injured pride.

to:

** The utter rhetorical '''[[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech demolishing]]''' of Heinrich Kramer, author of the ''Literature/MalleusMaleficarum'', by revealing his ''actual'' reasons for making it - effectively an angry hateblog aimed at a woman who dared to wound his ego by pointing out he was a ''terrible'' preacher, and after he tried to burn have her burned at the stake, the Inquisition itself ''[[EveryoneHasStandards told him he was a paranoid,]]'' paranoid]]'', eventually outright exiling him as a frankly ''pathetic'' little bully who did nothing except fearmonger to salve his injured pride.

Top