Archived Discussion Main / GreyAndGrayMorality

This is discussion archived from a time before the current discussion method was installed.

---

Working Title: Grey And Grey Morality: From YKTTW

Vampire Buddha: Here's some redirects to this page:

• Gray-and-Grey Morality
• Grey-and-Grey Morality
• Gray-and-Gray Morality

---

Mith: Before anyone says anything — mistake Cutlist! So sorry!

fleb: Cut Master didn't hear you though. (relevant link?)

Vampire Buddha: Rescued from Google cache.

---

Ununnilium:

• Piracy (Modern Day) Could be Argued like this. One side does steal intellectual property, from the businesses. However the businesses have a tendency to sue everyone they even, think, could possibly have pirated their stuff.

"Could be argued like this" = doesn't belong in the entry. Plus, Rule Of Cautious Editing Judgment.

---

Eric DVH: Removed the following:

• Erfworld has elements of this. While it can be said that one side certainly has an unsympathetic leader, as a whole both sides receive equal attention and sympathy. This is one of their reasons their back-and-forth conflicts are so gripping.

I'm not so sure about this one. I mean, The Coalition seems to be a likable enough mix of factions that probably fight each other pretty often when something like this isn't happening, and Parson is a reasonably nice guy who's only fighting out of a mixture of exhilaration and compulsion, but let's not forget the actual purpose of the conflict being waged. Parson/Gobwin Knob/Stanley's goal is to beat The Coalition (basically the entire world,) snatch up the Cosmic Keystones, and ultimately conquer the entire world. The Coalition's goal is to beat them, and then break apart and get on with life.

As sympathetic as Parson is personally, if he had a business card describing his functional role in the world at present, it would probably read “Parson Gotti, Evil Overlord.”

---

Does Crest of the Stars / Seikai no Monshou fit in here or is it more of the Rosseau was Right line of thinking?