Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion VideoGame / DonkeyKongCountryReturns

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Aug 16th 2014 at 9:03:49 AM •••

Re cut: This is a cut request caused by someone running afoul of The Problem with Pen Island and thinking that the small c version of the page is different from the big C one. Please don't cut it.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman Hide / Show Replies
MyFinalEdits (Ten years in the joint)
Aug 16th 2014 at 9:24:16 AM •••

Yeah, since succeeding in the cut will effectively kill the real page.

This does give me an idea for a new entry on the Just for Fun subpage of TPWPI, though. =P

135 - 169 - 273 - 191 - 188 - 230 - 300
Madrugada MOD Since: Jan, 2001
Aug 18th 2014 at 11:25:43 AM •••

Cut declined. As noted, this was The Problem with Pen Island

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
cylex7 Since: Apr, 2010
Jul 5th 2013 at 1:10:45 PM •••

What happened to the trope page? It just disappeared!!!

Hide / Show Replies
Willbyr MOD (Y2K)
75thTrombone Since: Jan, 2015
Nov 7th 2010 at 6:00:32 PM •••

The article currently leaves it open to debate whether King K. Rool will appear. My impression was that Rare owns the IP for the Kremlings, REQUIRING Retro to come up with different baddies. Nintendo would own the IP for the Kongs, of course, so there's no problem with any of those characters.

Anyone know if a K. Rool appearance is truly a legal possibility?

Hide / Show Replies
DinoVercotti Since: Oct, 2010
Nov 8th 2010 at 6:07:25 AM •••

Considering that King K. Rool and Kremlings have been appearing in several games since Rare left (even some of the Mario spin-offs), I'd say Nintendo owns them lock, stock and barrel. It's more like Nintendo just had no idea what Rare had been doing with the franchise (just look at Cranky's Character Derailment), and didn't properly follow up.

dancnbna Since: Aug, 2009
Dec 12th 2010 at 8:27:17 AM •••

The game is out now, and he's not in. Sorry.

96.63.36.153 Since: Dec, 1969
96.63.36.153 Since: Dec, 1969
Mar 18th 2011 at 9:17:49 AM •••

Dang it! Every time a page doesn't load, I have to press ENTER twice, resulting in a copy of that remark! So......yeeeeaaaah...

Edited by 96.63.36.153
GermanTroper Since: Jan, 2001
May 29th 2011 at 7:51:25 PM •••

I'll remove Meaningless Lives soon - the game uses pretty much the same system as Mario Galaxy 1/2, having respawning lives just before hard sections. Any objections?

SomeName Person Since: Oct, 2010
Person
Apr 24th 2011 at 1:25:28 AM •••

Why is Tiki Tong's name considered a spoiler? I realize the game obscures his appearance until you meet him, but the little information I could see a person gleaning from the name is stuff that they presumably would have expected. It becomes a weird sort of anti-twist where one starts expecting a bigger surprise as a result of all the spoiler tags.

Text I feel is necessary to append to every post. Hide / Show Replies
Raxis Since: Jan, 2001
May 25th 2011 at 5:36:56 PM •••

Agreed, all the name would help you learn is that the leader is a tiki, which is readily obvious.

Raxis Raxis Since: Jan, 2001
Raxis
May 25th 2011 at 5:36:09 PM •••

Should we we include a fridge brilliance or trivia segment for more of the punny area levels, such as Peaceful Pier?

96.63.36.153 Since: Dec, 1969
Mar 19th 2011 at 10:08:18 AM •••

Excited for beating up Kremlings next time, aren't you, Donkey?

Edited by 96.63.36.153
Top