Previous Trope Repair Shop thread: Ambiguous Name, started by GoodNewsEvry1 on May 11th 2019 at 4:29:42 AM
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanPrevious Trope Repair Shop thread: Misused, started by Cineking on Apr 21st 2020 at 9:23:42 PM
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanI'm not a big fan of this trope's title. It makes it sound like the character only walks around shirtless for one scene, but they're described as walking around shirtless 24/7. Perhaps we should rename it to something like Always Shirtless.
Edited by GoodNewsEvry1 Hide / Show RepliesI agree! And people always get confused at what it is about, they keep adding many examples that belong to Shirtless Scene and not here. I remove them whenever I can, but then the add more.
Does the category have to specifically be about Fanservice examples? The Smurfs themselves are prime examples of this trope, and they're just humanoid creatures that aren't made to be Fanservice-type characters.
The disclaimer that this is an Always Male trope is a bit odd. Why can't this trope apply if a female character does this in, for example, a work from a culture without the Nipple and Dimed taboo (not that I have a specific example)? Seems like a case of We All Live in America.
EDIT: There are female examples on the page, which is good, but I think the trope description and disclaimer should be altered to account for that. I'd like the hear what others think first rather than just doing it, though, since it'd be a somewhat significant change.
Edited by 70.33.253.45 Hide / Show RepliesYou may want to raise the issue in Trope Talk. You'd get more feedback there; in my experience, hardly anyone looks at discussion pages for most trope articles.
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.Could it be said that Indian actor Sabu (who was Abu in The Thief Of Bagdad) had something of a Walking Shirtless career?
Edited by serizawa3000How does Sonic not qualify?
I am completely, utterly, and thoroughly done with Sola Sonica and 2D Hide / Show RepliesThere's something else entirely for characters like him.
Edited by TARDISESSo what do you call a guy whose Shirtless "Scene" encompasses a whole episode uninterrupted?
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus. Hide / Show RepliesSo he doesn't count as a Walking Shirtless Scene within the scope of that episode, then?
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.Walking Shirtless Scene is a Costume Trope. If the shirtlessness isn't incorporated into the character's costume (ie. A fighting game character with a default or alt costume that has him exposed), it's not this.
Edited by SparkysharpsSo, if the character has one costume among several that has shirtlessness (or at least complete chest and abdomen exposure) as an intrinsic component, does he still count? That's what I get from the Playing With article's Zig-Zagged Trope entry.
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.You know, a woman who wears nothing but pasties on her chest * technically qualifies as a Walking Shirtless Scene. I don't know of any actual examples, but the point still stands.
Comments?
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.
Linking to a past Trope Repair Shop thread that dealt with this page: Wait, what?, started by Stratadrake on Oct 11th 2010 at 9:02:53 PM
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman