Follow TV Tropes

Following

Subpages cleanup: Complete Monster

Go To

During the investigation of recent hollers in the Complete Monster thread, it's become apparent to the staff that an insular, unfriendly culture has evolved in the Complete Monster and Magnificent Bastard threads that is causing problems.

Specific issues include:

  • Overzealous hollers on tropers who come into the threads without being familiar with all the rules and traditions of the tropes. And when they are familiar with said rules and traditions, they get accused (with little evidence) of being ban evaders.
  • A few tropers in the thread habitually engage in snotty, impolite mini-modding. There are also regular complaints about excessive, offtopic "socializing" posts.
  • Many many thread regulars barely post/edit anywhere else, making the threads look like they are divorced from the rest of TV Tropes.
  • Following that, there are often complaints about the threads and their regulars violating wiki rules, such as on indexing, crosswicking, example context and example categorization. Some folks are working on resolving the issues, but...
  • Often moderator action against thread regulars leads to a lot of participants suddenly showing up in the moderation threads to protest and speak on their behalf, like a clique.

It is not a super high level problem, but it has been going on for years and we cannot ignore it any longer. There will be a thread in Wiki Talk to discuss the problem; in the meantime there is a moratorium on further Complete Monster and Magnificent Bastard example discussion until we have gotten this sorted out.

Update: The new threads have been made and can be found here:

     Previous Post 
Complete Monster Cleanup Thread

Please see the Frequently Asked Questions and Common Requests List before suggesting any new entries for this trope.

IMPORTANT: To avoid a holler to the mods, please see here for the earliest date a work can be discussed, (usually two weeks from the US release), as well as who's reserved discussion.

When voting, you must specify the candidate(s). No blanket votes (i.e. "[tup] to everyone I missed").

No plagiarism: It's fair to source things, but an effortpost must be your own work and not lifted wholesale from another source.

We don't care what other sites think about a character being a Complete Monster. We judge this trope by our own criteria. Repeatedly attempting to bring up other sites will earn a suspension.

What is the Work

Here you briefly describe the work in question and explain any important setting details. Don't assume that everyone is familiar with the work in question.

Who is the Candidate and What have they Done?

This will be the main portion of the Effort Post. Here you list all of the crimes committed by the candidate. For candidates with longer rap sheets, keep the list to their most important and heinous crimes, we don't need to hear about every time they decide to do something minor or petty.

Do they have any Mitigating Factors or Freudian Excuse?

Here you discuss any potential redeeming or sympathetic features the character has, the character's Freudian Excuse if they have one, as well as any other potential mitigating factors like Offscreen Villainy or questions of moral agency. Try to present these as objectively as possible by presenting any evidence that may support or refute the mitigating factors.

Do they meet the Heinousness Standard?

Here you compare the actions of the Candidate to other character actions in the story in order to determine if they stand out or not. Remember that all characters, not just other villains, contribute to the Heinousness Standard

Final Verdict?

Simply state whether or not you think the character counts or not.

Edited by GastonRabbit on Aug 31st 2023 at 4:14:10 AM

ACW Unofficial Wiki Curator for Complete Monster from Arlington, VA (near Washington, D.C.) Since: Jul, 2009
#15026: Aug 2nd 2013 at 4:28:36 PM

[up]I guess it could happen. If the reverse could, why not this?

CM Dates; CM Pending; CM Drafts
Lightysnake Since: May, 2010
#15027: Aug 2nd 2013 at 4:36:58 PM

Also, for the Dance In The Vampire Bund entries, they need a rewrite, and Gabe in there as well.

  • The Three Lords of clans Rozenmann, Ivanovic in Li are all nasty customers in Dance In The Vampire Bund with Ivanovic being the most overtly brutal of the lot. In the past, the three destroyed and usurped all the other great vampire clans before murdering their sovereign, Queen Lucretia, and only sparing Lucretia's young daughter Min as a future tool for breeding for one of them. While Li hasn't been seen as much, he, Ivanovic and Rozenmann participate in a contest to determine who has possession of Mina: by sending their best assassins after her love interest Akira with the winner taking the prize. And subjecting Mina to a degrading chastity test so she knows she is the proper of the three.
    • Ivanovic, as the most vicious and unhinged of the three Lords leads a brutal attack on the Bund to capture Mina for his own pleasure. Once there, he deliberately targets civilians, and has the innocent fangless vampires executed to draw Mina out of hiding. He also uses as shock troops werewolves he's tortured into feral beasts that have forgotten their own humanity. Ivanovic at points attempts to rape Mina when he can and has a disturbing taste for young girls, not caring that Mina is in her younger body, as opposed to her adult form and even declares he'll only enjoy her adult body after he's had his pleasure of the younger one. In the past,he was also Grigori Rasputin and drove Russia into chaos and ruin. Mina barely rescued Grand Duchess Anastasia from being dragged to his bed chambers at the end.
    • Rozenmann, The Chessmaster. The most elegant, handsome, well dressed and polite of the three Lords, Rozenman is also the most intelligent and manipulative. He tricks Ivanovic into invading the Bund, knowing the death and destruction that will result. Planning for his fellow Lord's death, Rozenmann set up Mina to be kidnapped and replaced by a doppleganger whose terrorist attacks he was secretly financing and patronizing. With Mina in his hands, Rozenmann has Akira killed (Though he was Faking the Dead) solely to break Mina further and inject her with a drug to freeze her in adult form to rape her later. While Ivanovic is a wild, furious warlord, Rozenmann manipulates nearly every bad thing to happen in the series, with nary a care as to the many innocent lives or mental trauma he leaves behind him in his quest of domination.
    • Comparatively minor villain he may be, but the vampire crime boss Gabe from volume 11 uses his short screen time well. Gabe is a vampire sworn to Rozenmann living in New York where he's a vampire, pedophile and maker of child pornography who routinely taunts a stripper about paying a visit to her daughter Susy, who can't be more than six. After he learns the stripper is sheltering the runaway Mina, Gabe violently murders her friend and storms her apartment, immediately noticing how Susy is prettier than he imagined and attempting to seize her before Mina stops him. Gabe uses Susy and her mother as hostages so Mina surrenders under promises they won't be harmed. While Rozenmann's honorable werewolf retainer Gerhard is willing to give the assurance, Gabe makes it clear he has zero intention of not coming back for Susy and when Mina asks to feed, he comments he thought her child form was much hotter and if he can have Susy when Mina is done. Mina remarks he has mistaken her grievously before she rips his throat out, commenting his blood is as foul as his soul.

edited 2nd Aug '13 4:37:18 PM by Lightysnake

VeryMelon Since: Jul, 2011 Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
#15028: Aug 2nd 2013 at 5:11:28 PM

[tup] on Commodus and Vorster. [tdown] on Jeff.

edited 2nd Aug '13 5:11:54 PM by VeryMelon

Shaoken Since: Jan, 2001
#15029: Aug 2nd 2013 at 5:38:28 PM

Voting [tdown]On Jeff, Shido, Neutron and Eddy's brother. For the latter it's because, although I haven't seen the show, I don't think it can hit that bare minimum level where redemption is an impossiblity because it's a kid's show of lesser depth than say, Avatar The Last Airbender (plus honestly I don't believe in a one-scene wonder CM). Plus physical assault and torment is still below the baseline henious standards, since under that criteria we could qualfiy 80% of comic book villians as meeting the bare minimum standards to be considered as CMs.

For Jeff Family Guy is just such a dark show with so many henious deeds and not I don't think it's possible for it to have a Complete Monster.

For Shido it sounds like they are an irredeamable bastard, but that doesn't equal a Complete Monster. The closest he'd get is sthe trying to kill someone's family, but that is still only a step towards it, I just don't see them being the embodiment of pure evil that this trope is supposed to be. I honestly think that he would stick out on a list of complete monsters as not being a contender.

For Neutron, I have to go with Ambar's logic and say that he's overshadowed by people with the same level of power who have the ambition to actually go out and do even worse things.

edited 2nd Aug '13 5:48:31 PM by Shaoken

Lightysnake Since: May, 2010
#15030: Aug 2nd 2013 at 5:43:20 PM

I think the way he's played as a domestic abuser with no redeeming qualities extremely heinously pushes him over the age. It darkens the show considerably.

Klavice Since: Jan, 2011
#15031: Aug 2nd 2013 at 5:52:24 PM

Have we voted on all the MLP fanworks examples? I know we voted to cut the FIW examples and the Mentally Advanced Series examples but aside from that I don't remember us having a decisive vote on the other examples.

FIW needs to be cleaned. Fluttershy and Twilight are still listed as Complete Monsters and the show isn't taken seriously enough for any of them to qualify. And if Jeff is going I say we cut Fluttershy's dad too, he's pretty much the same deal. (almost every single one of the mane cast is played more heinously than him and they aren't serious characters. He is apparently but still pales.)

Also voting no on Eddy's Brother and Jeff from Family Guy. Both are just Jerkasses.

edited 2nd Aug '13 5:59:21 PM by Klavice

Shaoken Since: Jan, 2001
#15032: Aug 2nd 2013 at 5:56:06 PM

He's still basically a bully. He doesn't kill anyone, doesn't cripple anyone, basically if he disappeared from that point onward the show would go back to the way it was. When we established the baseline heniouness limiter, this is the sort of example it was supposed to block out; character's who are the worst that show has to offer, but are so laughably out of place when compared to the Fire Lord Ozai's of the list. Taking a quick look over it you have either confirmed murderers or attempted murderers, people who are selling drugs to children and attempting murder via drugs, liberal applications of Mind Rape, etc.

In comparison, Eddy's brother is just a bully.

HamburgerTime Since: Apr, 2010
#15033: Aug 2nd 2013 at 5:59:40 PM

[up] Nothing like that even happens in Ed... though. And again, we already decided him.

Shaoken Since: Jan, 2001
#15034: Aug 2nd 2013 at 6:01:59 PM

[up]Which is the point, and there's still a debate going on about him so I'd say there hasn't been a decision yet.

Lightysnake Since: May, 2010
#15035: Aug 2nd 2013 at 6:04:21 PM

[up][up] As said before, wasn't he already discussed and voted in? I don't see why we should bar a domestic abuser whose crimes are played seriously in a lighthearted work when they're showed to be extremely heinous and having left acute mental scars on the victim.

And why, again, are we suddenly extending criteria to 'heinous next to one another?' That's not how this works and was never how it was supposed to.

edited 2nd Aug '13 6:05:12 PM by Lightysnake

Shaoken Since: Jan, 2001
#15036: Aug 2nd 2013 at 6:09:22 PM

[up]Um, yes it always has. That is literally what the baseline henious standard is; a comparison to see if they stack up to other Complete Monsters. That was the reason we gave for discounting my little pony villians (next to the impossiblity of being irredeamable).

edited 2nd Aug '13 6:10:19 PM by Shaoken

AustinDR Lizzid people! (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
Lizzid people!
#15037: Aug 2nd 2013 at 6:18:13 PM

Woah, woah, let's all calm down. Yes, Eddy's Brother was already voted on, and he was counted as a CM on the Cartoon Network page. Now that that's out of the way, let's go to another topic.

edited 2nd Aug '13 6:20:19 PM by AustinDR

SeaRover Since: Mar, 2012
#15038: Aug 2nd 2013 at 6:21:26 PM

@15041 How far does one have to go in order to qualify? That guy has done quite a few things to destroy the status quo. He killed Tadao, he caused Miki to miss Tadao's funeral, he got Kagami fired from her own firm and caused her to lose her Law license, he beat up Konata, causing her to lose three of her teeth, and when things took a turn against him, he killed Patricia, burned down the aforementioned firm, and for his last act, shot and killed Ayano (and that was his second attempt on her life, his first being to trap her inside the burning building). All fic long, he has had not one real Pet the Dog moment. Not a single one. And he also stands out among all the other villains from both that fic and its prequel, Loss of Innocence, such as Tsukasa's rapist Ryosuke and his cohorts, her short-lived punk friend Yuka Miyakawa, Tsukasa herself for some time after having been raped, and Patricia (following a beating by Tsukasa; also eventually came around). If none of that qualifies him for this trope, then what would?

Shaoken Since: Jan, 2001
#15039: Aug 2nd 2013 at 6:25:51 PM

We are calm. That he was already voted on once doesn't automatically mean that he's completely off limits, plus looking back through the first page of search results and I still haven't found a part where anyone voted on him, more that people talked about him and other people talked about different things.

EDIT IN: Looking through the thred, I found maybe two votes for him back on 328 and that's it. EDIT OUT

I move to have Eddy's brother removed for the following reasons:

1) He doesn't meet the irredeamable standard. Nothing he's done up and makes it impossible for redemption to occur. That it never happens is irrelevant; we've seen people who have done worse get redeemed.

2) Half of the example for him talks up how he makes everyone else pull an Even Evil Has Standards moment.

3) As I said before, I don't believe in a one scene Complete Monster.

4) Baseline henious factor; look at every other example on the page and you see people whose's least henious crime involves either literal Mind Rape, attempted murder, or inflciting Cold-Blooded Torture that makes brutal physical abuse seem less henious in comparison. Simply put, he sticks out like a sore thumb on that page, which is why we included the baseline heniousness subclause to begin with.

edited 2nd Aug '13 6:37:51 PM by Shaoken

AustinDR Lizzid people! (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
Lizzid people!
#15040: Aug 2nd 2013 at 6:38:01 PM

With Eddy's Brother, it's been shown that he enjoys bullying and torturing kids. Since he loves to torture kids, he most likely would've never stopped had Ed didn't have a smart moment and caused the door to his mobile home to smash him in the face. Basically, the main idea with Eddy's Brother is that unlike the Peach Creek kids, his abuse of Eddy is made more horrific because it's one of his own blood that he's beating up. From a certain point, not all of the Cul-de-sac kids were evil. In fact, them hunting down the Eds to beat them up seemed justified since they really screwed up that time and severly injured the kids. It's more of even jerks have standards. The Kankers, on the other hand, did have an Even Evil Has Standards moment. I'm not trying to defend the entry, I'm just trying to give information on what I know about him.

edited 2nd Aug '13 6:39:22 PM by AustinDR

Shaoken Since: Jan, 2001
#15041: Aug 2nd 2013 at 6:41:10 PM

Well the point stands that it doesn't look like we ever had a proper vote on him, since every single instance of him I found with the search function (made worse by the fact he doesn't have a name) had him brought up whenever we were discussing a lot of examples at once. If I had to guess he was put in before the TRS thread where Fast Eddie said "clean up or it gets cut" and has just been overlooked ever since then.

EDIT: Thinking more on this, perhaps what we need is a sandbox page that is listing what characters we are currently discussing and a list of the keeps, cuts and decide laters. Only problem with that is how much pain it would be to keep up to date.

edited 2nd Aug '13 6:44:36 PM by Shaoken

Lightysnake Since: May, 2010
#15042: Aug 2nd 2013 at 6:59:29 PM

Honestly, Shaoken, it sounds like Shido meets the heinous standard. Several murders, plus arson and dicking with people plus brutal beatings...seems pretty fitting.

Crowley Since: Jan, 2001
#15043: Aug 2nd 2013 at 7:18:53 PM

Well if we really are going to have to do a second vote then I might as well re-put in my support for the Ed Edd and Eddy example for what it counts.

VeryMelon Since: Jul, 2011 Relationship Status: Anime is my true love
#15044: Aug 2nd 2013 at 9:05:33 PM

[tup] on Shindo and Eddy's Brother.

nrjxll Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Not war
#15045: Aug 2nd 2013 at 9:09:26 PM

I have to say "no" on Eddy's Brother. He seems like another (if slightly different) manifestation of the previously encountered case where "worst person in a work" is not synonymous with Complete Monster.

StarSword Captain of USS Bajor from somewhere in deep space Since: Sep, 2011
xie323 Since: Jul, 2009
#15047: Aug 2nd 2013 at 9:25:54 PM

[tup] on Shido

edited 2nd Aug '13 9:26:08 PM by xie323

nrjxll Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Not war
#15048: Aug 2nd 2013 at 9:43:06 PM

Can someone give me a link to where Shido was discussed? The name is not ringing a bell.

TVRulezAgain Since: Sep, 2011
#15049: Aug 2nd 2013 at 9:47:13 PM

I'm neutral about Eddy's brother, but a few things:

Regarding the whole one scene thing, yes he only appears once but he has major significance to the story. His abuse and belittlement of Eddy is what caused Eddy to act like a greedy Jerkass throughout the series.

As for heinousness, well, he's definitely the worst for the setting. It's a show with only 12 characters, all of them preteens, and adults are offscreen (except Eddy's brother). In a setting like that, an adult abusing his 12-year-old brother and having done it all his life is, at the very least, the closest to a CM on the show.

Now, I think Eddy's brother was discussed back when we were cleaning the Cartoon Network page, so I'll look through those discussions to see why he was voted keep at the time.

EDIT: I think the discussion for Eddy's brother started around here.

edited 2nd Aug '13 10:10:35 PM by TVRulezAgain

Lightysnake Since: May, 2010
#15050: Aug 2nd 2013 at 10:03:10 PM

[up][up] It's just within the last couple of pages. Sea Rover brought him up. I think he's from a fanfic


Total posts: 326,048
Top