This thread is a metathread for Trope Repair Shop discussion. Things like TRS policy, what is needed in a TRS opening post, questions about whether a certain topic is TRS-worthy and questions about why a thread wasn't opened go here.
Some guidelines for when/whether to use TRS:
- If the trope is fine, but has some bad examples, feel free to clean them up or to start a cleanup project at Projects: Short-Term. Trope Repair Shop is for when cleaning isn't sufficient.
- If you think there's something wrong with the trope that systematically attracts improper examples, start a discussion at Trope Talk. Use a Wick Check to see whether there's an issue present (and if there is, what the issue is), and post the results on TRS Queue and wait your turn if a problem is present. The following methods are two possible ways to do a wick check (though not necessarily the only ways):
- You can go ahead with the Wick Check without a discussion if you know what you're looking for. While it's not mandatory, feel free to ask someone for help confirming that you got the issue and the numbers correct.
- Consult the Wick Check Project thread to collect evidence if you need help.
- If a wick check is too much for you, you can leave the issue at Tropes Needing TRS citing the discussion.
- Depending on a trope (or non-trope) in question, a wick check may be determined to not be required, such as for tropes that are not thriving (per the standards for trope health listed on the Wick page). However, there is no problem if you want to do one anyway.
For a more detailed introduction to this forum, click here.
For related projects, see Wick Cleaning Projects and the Wick Check Project.
See Tropes Needing TRS for a list of trope candidates for TRS.
A (not mandatory, informal) queue for prospective TRS participants can be found at the TRS Queue.
For a list of wiki pages related to thread outcomes, see the following:
Edited by GastonRabbit on Apr 24th 2024 at 1:49:19 PM
It's been nearly a month since the issue with Idiot Programming has been resolved, but the thread isn't closed yet. Should I have notified a mod, or is there another reason why the thread was kept open?
It looks done, should you should have notified a mod. Using the "Holler Mod" button works for this purpose.
edited 24th Nov '17 3:57:20 PM by Karxrida
If a tree falls in the forest and nobody remembers it, who else will you have ice cream with?Why was my thread for This Trope Is X declined? ~Septimus Heap, you're right, the pages on the index don't share a word or phrase in their title so it's technically not a Search Generated Index like I claimed. However, it's as useless as an SGI because the tropes themselves (as opposed to their titles) have no common feature. Also, the page claims that the index is for trope titles that are snowclones, which, as I said in the thread, isn't true at all. A work can use most of these tropes without using snowclones of their titles that replace the placeholder.
edited 9th Dec '17 6:47:02 PM by Lymantria
Join the Five-Man Band cleanup project!Well, an index that catalogues tropes based on a trait of their name is not necessarily a problem, which is particularly relevant given the TRS backlog.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanI thought the reason why Search Generated Indexes were disallowed is because the tropes themselves are not related, only their titles. How is that also not the case here? Also, the description is still wrong. Ignore the backlog for now.
Search-Generated Index says tropes should be catalogued by their relevance, usage and nature, not by their titles.
edited 10th Dec '17 6:27:29 AM by Lymantria
Join the Five-Man Band cleanup project!I am worried that the Casting Gag thread will get locked at the end of the month due to the New Year's Purge. It's gone stale recently; does anyone else want a say on that trope's problem?
I'd like a response to my question.
Join the Five-Man Band cleanup project!Since the article in question is an index, I'm not sure how "broken" it really can be if it's a Search Generated Index. TRS is for tropes that are broken so we can repair them... and even when it isn't a trope, there still needs to be evidence that the article is broken in some way.
It seems like you could ask about that index in ATT rather than taking it to TRS.
That said, I personally don't see this as a searchable thing. If you search for "X" — the common element in most of the names for these tropes — you'll find articles on X-Men, X-23, The X-Fils, Xenoblade Chronicles X... but you won't find, say, Heh Heh, You Said "X".
Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they prettyYou're completely missing the point. As I said above, tropes should be categorized by their relevance, usage and nature, not their titles. That makes the index useless.
Join the Five-Man Band cleanup project!I think you missed my point that ATT can handle the issue of "a useless index." As already stated, TRS currently has a backlog so something like that doesn't exactly need a TRS effort...
Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they prettySo I should have brought it up in ATT instead of TRS? I get it, except that there's currently an open TRS thread for Hollywood Style, which is an index (and not also a trope like Death Trap).
Barring that, however, I might bring it up in ATT.
edited 24th Dec '17 8:56:01 AM by Lymantria
Join the Five-Man Band cleanup project!The issue you brought up for the one index is not equivalent to the one for Hollywood Style. And that thread may have been made before the backlog got bad. There's no need to take it personally???
Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they prettyNot equivalent? How so?
Join the Five-Man Band cleanup project!They're completely different. Your thread was about the list items. The other thread was about the description.
Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they prettyIdeally, how many wicks should a trope have in order for it to be renamed?
So, since we were a mite late about the New Year Purge. It will take place on the 7th January 2017. All threads with no activity since November will be closed at that point. Please no contentless bumps, thanks, unless it's to signal progress on a cleanup or an useful addition to a discussion.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanWhy was it not announced previously? Or at least not in this thread or anywhere else I've seen.
Join the Five-Man Band cleanup project!People discussing and worrying about it may have caused the mods to consider doing it. There's been an uptick in activity due to the fear of the purge, so it makes sense to give the people what they want. Or at least, that's my guess based on what I've seen around the forums lately.
Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they prettyI'm going to presume the thread for The Dragon will stick around since that requires a lot of work (some of which has been done) and is too major too close, even though progress stalled a bit in October.
If a tree falls in the forest and nobody remembers it, who else will you have ice cream with?I don't think so, actually - there has always been concern that the The Dragon effort is a make work project that takes up undue amount of effort.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanSo what should be done with the page, then?
Also, what's a make work project?
edited 3rd Jan '18 8:18:10 AM by Lymantria
Join the Five-Man Band cleanup project!https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/make-work
The claim is that fixing the examples of The Dragon is not a productive use of tropers time.
Link to TRS threads in project mode here.Elaborate. What should be done with the page, then? Leave it half-fixed?!
Join the Five-Man Band cleanup project!
The ball was probably dropped.
edited 21st Nov '17 1:56:05 AM by Karxrida
If a tree falls in the forest and nobody remembers it, who else will you have ice cream with?