That's a very bad case of JAFAAC, ja. I would be fine with pulling it.
That was the amazing part. Things just keep going.Ugh... pull.
edited 28th Jun '13 11:56:21 AM by Rethkir
Image Source. Please update whenever an image is changed.How is this JAFAAC? It clearly shows a book by one author in a series created by another, so it's pretty obvious what that means. That's a clear illustration of the trope, and I haven't even heard of these authors.
Keep Until Better Image Suggested.
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!It's hard to see at first, but now I see it. I think a larger image would help.
Image Source. Please update whenever an image is changed.^
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanSomeone else can write a book about a character before the creator is dead. Doesn't show the trope.
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.Without violating copyright or trademark law?
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanWith permission from the original rights holder, yes.
edited 28th Jun '13 12:59:31 PM by Madrugada
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.That is extremely common, especially if a publishing company (not an individual) "owns" the character.
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.Come on, with arguments like that you can discount literally every image on the site. Yeah, maybe this guy has a funky implant that is mundane. Possibly this is not a computer but a guy in a Halloween outfit. What if this is not a kid but he's using a youthful polymorph? Images don't have to be perfect, almost none of them are.
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!The term you want is "red paint", after a claim someone once made that blood in a picture could just be paint.
"Red paint" arguments are far-fetched interpretations. That is obvious and common.
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.Part of my issue with the Bourne one is its design. The author's name is so separate that I think the eye naturally doesn't really pay attention to it. It's much the same idea, but maybe And Another Thing◊?
Just throwing it out there.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.And Another Thing is very good.
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.That's much better.
I also like the "part six of three" part.
Check out my fanfiction!Bump; anyone else for/against 14?
edited 5th Jul '13 9:50:33 AM by Willbyr
Looks good to me.
One or two more votes for 14 and we can run with it.
Well, I hate to do this because I suggested the damn thing, but looks like 14 is in use on And Another Thing....
One of the images could be swapped out for the European cover◊, I suppose. Or this one◊ could go on this page. It would actually work better since the words are larger and the image is even less busy. But I don't know if it's different enough to subvert it being a Duplicate Image.
edited 5th Jul '13 4:28:30 PM by Larkmarn
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.I don't think that would be abusing the "duplicate image" rule, and we allow works and tropes to share an image, so using a different cover should be fine.
Cool, just making sure it's not an issue.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.Yeah, there's nothing in the pictures saying the creator is dead. So I'm against.
Crown Description:
Nominations for replacement images:
I suppose the trivium is evident in the work, but the image does not illustrate it without previous knowledge. Might it be removed/replaced?