I second closing the topic.
I would agree with the first idea, but with the second I need some quoteblocking.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanI was suggesting replacing the one bullet point (quoted in my third quoteblock) with the two bullet points at the bottom. Imagine a quoteblock around those two bullet points if it helps. (Everything I was discussing there is bulleted on the page.)
Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.A shorter version of your proposed changes is fine for me.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanI'm mostly concerned about the first one (about Whole-Plot Reference). If you're not comfortable with the second, I'm willing to let it slide. It's much less important.
edited 31st Jan '13 10:38:48 PM by Xtifr
Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.Beside the issue in the last few posts, I still see this:
- Anyone can post an example, even if it's crazy (saying that Gone With The W Ind is Avatar, in (a difference). Sounds like Avatar was released first, but it isn't
- Think there needs to be some sort of Word of God for each example. Most of these are just Wild Mass Guessing
- Move/split examples to Fridge Logic or Wild Mass Guessing?
- Is it duplicate to several tropes?
edited 2nd Feb '13 1:39:27 AM by spacemarine50
About #1 and #2: We do many tropes without citations, even if they rely on authorial intent. And nobody has shown a problem there anyway.
About #3: Why?
About #4: Already thumbed-down. Also, if you have to say "Is it duplicate to several tropes?" then there is a good chance you are wrong.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanAbout the second... the third "common thing to avoid" described in the Recycled In Space page is "It needs to be blatant in its advertising that it is a copy for it to count. You could argue that "Eragon was better when it was called Star Wars" but since nothing ever advertises the similarities, it doesn't count as this."
edited 2nd Feb '13 2:05:11 AM by MagBas
Last call for objections to my first change proposed in post 51, which is unopposed so far.
(I'll leave out the other change, since it seems both more controversial and less necessary.)
Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.Ok, I made that first change, and didn't bother with the second. As far as I'm concerned, there's no other issues that really need repair shop attention. Cleanup, assuming any is needed, is something that can always be done at any time. Unless someone else has an issue, I move to close the thread.
Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.Agree on this motion.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanSeems there's no further issue here (assuming there was one to begin with).
Agree with closing.
Why do you think there's no issue left?
See @58 and @59.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanClosing this, then.
"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - Fighteer
Ok, first this:
should become:
I also suggest splitting the following into two separate points:
There's two different issues there:
edit: fixing typos
edited 29th Jan '13 12:10:15 PM by Xtifr
Speaking words of fandom: let it squee, let it squee.