TV Tropes Org

Forums

Deadlock Clock: 10th Dec '12 11:59 PM
search forum titles
google site search
Total posts: [84]
1
 2  3 4

Complaining: Tastes Like Diabetes get usage counts

I think this page should either be moved to Darth Wiki or have an Example Sectionectomy. It sounds too much like "complaining about shows being too fluffy".
 
someone
Some of the examples look like shoehorning, since they're about individual charcaters instead of the actual work. That Batman: The Animated Series one in particular. Even worse is that I see some things that are most definitely not kid-oriented.

But really, this is more gushing than complaining ("aww, look how cute that is" as opposed to "bleh, that's painfully cute") Although I do see some of the examples that go "ugh".

There's some nattery bits too. And examples tend to be written as if they're dialogue, even when they're not "replying" to anything. Examples:

  • The cross dressing toddler form of Italy, Chibitalia, from Axis Powers Hetalia.
    • Also, episode 22.
    • How about Chibi-USA? He's adorable, isn't he?
    • Basically, if they're not a bishie-sex god, they are the most adorable thing to ever rot you teeth out, ever.

* A Little Snow Fairy Sugar... the epitome of overly-cutesy Moe Moe if there ever was one.
  • Note that the word "sugar" is right there in the name, as is "fairy". That might actually count as a Lampshade Hanging.[[/quoiteblock]]

[[quoteblock]] —> "Lilac, you're the most sickeningly sweet person ever to grace the planet, aren't you?" Lilac didn't seem to catch the insult, and just smiled broadly, apparently under the impression that her 'influence' had reached B as well.

* Oh boy Willow and Tara in the early stages of their relationship in Buffy the Vampire Slayer, the episode "Family" being the sappiest episode ever.

Full of Word Cruft like addressing the reader, "not to mention X" and usage of superlatives.

And I'm not sure what the hell this one is:
  • Your Mileage May Vary, but the 1981 episode of The Muppet Show with Linda Ronstadt was arguably a low point. No offense to any Ronstadt fans out there, but she wasn't really the best choice for a guest host. After so many high-spirited and even brassy celebrities who could at the very least hold their own alongside the Muppets - Peter Sellers, Dom DeLuise, Raquel Welch, even Rudolf Nureyev for goodness's sakes (and when a Russian can appear jollier than you!) - Ronstadt just seems so quiet and demure (and, with that idiotic little grin, like a Stepford Smiler) that she winds up dragging down the entire show. The Muppets try their best to compensate with their trademark subversive and even ghoulish humor, and Linda's first number, Roy Orbison's "Blue Bayou", is fine (although she performs it in nineteenth-century "granny" underwear for some odd reason), but the finale, with her singing "When I Grow Too Old To Dream", is just too sentimentalized and pathetic to make anyone feel good, made all the worse by resident Jerkass Rizzo the Rat actually shedding tears as he listens to the song. But perhaps the worst part is that (Muppets Tonight and the odd special notwithstanding)

edited 21st Mar '12 8:40:16 PM by ThatHuman

something
If any examples aren't complaining, we should cut them, because this is a page for sentimentality gone bad. Probably a good idea to cut the ones that are complaining too.

someone
[up] I'm not quite sure what you mean there.

Also, some examples are just shoehorning cute things from works that are neither kid-oriented nor kid-friendly.

edited 21st Mar '12 9:19:59 PM by ThatHuman

something
I meant that this article is for saccharine examples. Excessively sweet content - hence "diabetes." Any example that is neutral, much less gushing, is misuse.

The second paragraph was evidently forced in by someone who wished to emphasize that Tropes Are Not Bad. Tropes are not bad - but this isn't a trope. It's a negative audience reaction.

Having established that this page is exclusively for complaining, we could reexamine whether we want it at all.

 6 lu 127, Wed, 21st Mar '12 11:04:53 PM from the Capital of Light Relationship Status: Loves me...loves me not
If that's true, I'd be in favour of repurposing this into something other than an Audience Reaction, because in this case, I really think Tropes Are Not Bad.
迷子の足音消えた 代わりに祈りの唄
someone
Something weird: The second paragraph mentions that Tropes Are Not Bad, but the YMMV banner says it's an audience reaction.
something
I still remember when, for the longest time, this was not considered Subjective or YMMV - and it was practically being treated as an objective trope. That, of course, was misguided - since different people have different tolerance levels for sweetness, just like different people have different tolerance levels for angst. For awhile, that "trope" also had Tastes Like Dirt as its inverse - since since got got. Quite frankly, the description sounds a little too much like a "this thing is bad, and you should feel bad for liking it" Take That. If this does ending up remaining, it either should have no examples - or it should be on Darth Wiki, along with other highly negative Audience Reaction "tropes".

edited 22nd Mar '12 8:39:22 AM by movie007

 
 9 Mag Bas, Thu, 22nd Mar '12 8:43:27 AM from In my house
I guess"should have no examples" is the best option. The Darth Wiki is not dumping ground.

 10 lee4hmz, Mon, 26th Mar '12 11:37:17 AM from Giant Not-A-Base
Lurks too much
I'd probably also consider a rename, since the name itself makes it sound like a complaints-department page. Also, how you define something as too saccharine? Just being sugary in and of itself strikes me as not meaningful enough to trope, and besides, we have all of Sugar Wiki for that.

Human: That Muppet Show example should probably be on Dethroning Moment of Suck, not this page.

edited 26th Mar '12 11:39:42 AM by lee4hmz

Taking suggestions for a new sig. PM me or something!
 11 Dragon Quest Z, Mon, 26th Mar '12 11:40:51 AM from Somewhere in California
The Other Troper
Doesn't Sugar Bowl already cover the objective trope aspect?
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
 12 lee4hmz, Mon, 26th Mar '12 11:50:12 AM from Giant Not-A-Base
Lurks too much
For the most part, yes, but that covers places that are actually really that sweet, most of which don't exist outside of fantasy works — which makes it hard to apply to something like a Sitcom that's mostly grounded in reality.

On top of that, this page strikes me as more of a messy hybrid than anything clear-cut. It's part Lighter and Softer But More So, part Complaining About Characters You Dont Like (i.e. "examples that got lost on the way to Dethroning Moment of Suck or Wall Banger"), part "not-quite-comprehensive guide to works This Troper thinks are endearingly sweet" (which would be a welcome So Cool It's Awesome-esque addition to Sugar Wiki if it's not already there).
Taking suggestions for a new sig. PM me or something!
 13 Dragon Quest Z, Mon, 26th Mar '12 12:01:48 PM from Somewhere in California
The Other Troper
[up]Actually, that's what Gushing About Shows You Like allows.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
I really don't think the link to Tastes Like Diabetes (subjective) should be in the trope description for Sugar Bowl (objective). Otherwise, that sort of implies that Sugar Bowl is inherently a bad trope - and, of course, Tropes Are Not Bad.

ETA: Okay, I just checked the page for Sugar Bowl - and I see that Tastes Like Diabetes has now been removed, so that's good.

I've had half a mind to think that Crapsaccharine World should be renamed - until I realized that it's not only a pun on Crapsack World, but "saccharine" can also be used to indicate that the world isn't as "sugar" as it looks. After all, saccharine is an artificial sweetener.

BTW, I'm fine with Sugar Bowl. After all, this very wiki does have Sugar Wiki.

edited 26th Mar '12 4:49:32 PM by movie007

 
Ecce Homo Superior
[up]"Saccharine" is also the adjective form of "sugar". I never knew that it was an artificial sweetener, and I don't think Crapsaccharine World was meant to reference that.

But I don't see a reason to rename Crapsaccharine World anyway.

edited 27th Mar '12 1:19:56 AM by DoktorvonEurotrash

(it's David Bowie)
 16 lee4hmz, Tue, 27th Mar '12 7:25:08 AM from Giant Not-A-Base
Lurks too much
Besides, the artificial sweetener is "saccharin" (no E).
Taking suggestions for a new sig. PM me or something!
 17 Dr Starky, Tue, 27th Mar '12 10:04:32 AM from Corn And Pig Land Relationship Status: Staying up all night to get lucky
Okay Guy
I don't think this needs to be renamed. It's a negative reaction, so a negative name is kind of appropriate.

I think the complaining comes from the fact the definition is negative.
Put me in motion, drink the potion, use the lotion, drain the ocean, cause commotion, fake devotion, entertain a notion, be Nova Scotian
 18 Septimus Heap, Tue, 27th Mar '12 10:06:06 AM from Muggio Valley, Switzerland Relationship Status: Mu
Puʻu ʻŌʻō
Seconding. The definition, if anything, needs to be less negative. The name is fine.

 19 Septimus Heap, Sat, 31st Mar '12 3:27:09 AM from Muggio Valley, Switzerland Relationship Status: Mu
Puʻu ʻŌʻō
OK. Can someone write up an actual description for this so that it gets one rather than a random rant there?

 20 ccoa, Tue, 1st May '12 6:19:55 AM from the Sleeping Giant
With Mod Hat On
Clocking due to lack of activity.
Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
someone
Hmm, while the description sounds like it's supposed to be "kids' shows that are really, really, really, * sweet", some examples are shoehorned into "[character] is really sweet and cute". Like the Lucky Star example in the Anime and Manga section. I see at least one example about a character that isn't actually sweet (Batman: The Animated Series).

I guess removing examples wouldn't be too bad, considering that this gets misused as "random things that are cute/sweet", instead of "sweetness used to appeal to a child audience". But, a way to get rid of misuse might work too.

edited 1st May '12 12:40:20 PM by ThatHuman

something
 22 lee4hmz, Tue, 1st May '12 12:45:15 PM from Giant Not-A-Base
Lurks too much
As far as I can tell, it's "sweetness being used in an inappropriately over-the-top manner"; I'd like to add "manipulative", but that would make it identical to Glurge. It's by no means limited to kids' shows, either; there's plenty of things meant for adults that are lighter and fluffier than they probably should be.

Also, if an entry is "OMG I WUV THIS CHAR SHE'S SO KY 00 T XD", it probably doesn't belong. This is for things whose cuteness you find annoying, not endearing, I think, which probably means that individual characters shouldn't be here at all (lest there be way too much bitching about the latest Moe Blob fad).

edited 1st May '12 12:58:10 PM by lee4hmz

Taking suggestions for a new sig. PM me or something!
someone
Well, the intro specifically mentions:

This is an audience reaction to works that are superficially attempting to be overly kid-friendly— using almost all the tropes of cuteness and idealism, like there's some kind of checklist — and Go Horribly Right. '

Emphasis mine. Mentions that it's about works, not random characters or things inside a work.

But, if you look back at an older write-up, this page may have been intended as a complaining page:

Oh, you want to know what this is? This is superficial attempts at cuteness—using all the tropes of cuteness, like there's some kind of checklist—and failing spectacularly.

Although, looking at even older write-ups, it seems like the page actually was "put anything sweet on this page".

Anyway, if it's supposed to be sweetness that annoys, doesn't that make it a complaining page?

edited 1st May '12 1:51:47 PM by ThatHuman

something
"Sickeningly sweet" doesn't seem tropeworthy.
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel.
Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
 25 lee4hmz, Tue, 1st May '12 3:29:35 PM from Giant Not-A-Base
Lurks too much
Yeah, being sickeningly sweet in and of itself is getting really close to being Chairs, complaint magnet or not. And qualifying that by saying it's sweetness you don't like makes it a complaint page.

So I'm not sure what to do here...maybe it'd be better just to cut it and move the positive examples to Gushing About Shows You Like. As for tropes that indicate sweetness, I'm starting to wonder if there's a Missing Supertrope.

EDIT: Okay, there's not; I'd forgotten about Rule of Cute. :P I think we need a page action crowner...

edited 1st May '12 3:34:34 PM by lee4hmz

Taking suggestions for a new sig. PM me or something!

Page Action: Tastes Like Diabetes
12th May '12 5:28:58 AM
What would be the best way to fix the page?
At issue:
Total posts: 84
1
 2  3 4


TV Tropes by TV Tropes Foundation, LLC is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from thestaff@tvtropes.org.
Privacy Policy